Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs

英特尔Xe显卡G7(Tiger-Lake UGPU,96EU)是高端Tiger-Lake U CPU(15-28瓦特)的集成显卡。 使用新的Xe体系结构(Gen12),于2020年9月引进。 所有CPU的基本时钟速度(保证)为400MHz的GPU时钟,最高可提升1340MHz(i7-1185G7)。 最慢的变型仅提供1100MHz的升压(i5-1130G7、12瓦特TDP)。

性能取决于笔记本电脑的TDP设置和使用冷却设备。 根据第一个信息,芯片可以设置为 12W 和 28W TDP(作为 Ice Lake-U 芯片),并且性能必须在 3D Mark 基准的专用 GeForce MX350 附近。 由于缺少专用图形内存和驱动程序支持,游戏性能可能会下降。 许多游戏(例如,Horizon Zero Dawn、Cyberpunk 2077等)在测试各种笔记本电脑时出现问题。请参阅下面的列表。 像Mass Effect Legend Edition这样的低负荷游戏在中等设定下正常运行。 与以前的Ice Lake Iris Plus G7 GPU相比,新的Tiger Lake GPU的速度约为原来的2倍。 因此,iGPU仅适用于要求苛刻的游戏中最低的图形设置和低分辨率。

Tiger Lake SoCs 和集成 GPU 在英特尔采用最新的 10nm+ (10nm SuperFin) 工艺(改进的 10nm 工艺)制造,因此效率非常高。

Gen. 12 / Xe Series

Iris Xe G7 96EUs 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
CodenameTiger Lake Xe
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed400 - 1350 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption28 Watt
technology10 nm
Features3.8 MB L3 Cache, QuickSync, Device ID 9A49, Vendor ID 8086
Date of Announcement15.08.2020
CPU in Iris Xe G7 96EUsGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core 9 270H14 x 2000 MHz, 45 W? MHz1550 MHz
Intel Core i9-13900HK14 x 1900 MHz, 45 W? MHz1500 MHz
Intel Core i9-13905H14 x 1900 MHz, 45 W? MHz1500 MHz
min. - max.400 MHz950 - 1550 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.9 pt (6%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -97%
...
1.757 -9%
1.768 -8%
AMD Radeon 660M
1.772 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
1.791 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
1.794 -7%
1.867 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
1.886 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
1.898 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
1.911 -1%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1.926
1.959 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
1.962 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
1.981 3%
2.07 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.11 10%
2.19 14%
2.22 15%
2.27 18%
2.28 18%
...
17.3 798%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1629%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 789     avg: 1678     median: 1738 (5%)     max: 2159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 707     avg: 1497     median: 1561 (3%)     max: 1890 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -92%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P600
1162 -22%
1176 -21%
unknown
1257 -16%
1281 -14%
1322 -12%
AMD Radeon Pro 560
1376 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
1388 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
1395 -7%
AMD Radeon 660M
1425 -5%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1497
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
1614 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
1615 8%
1616 8%
1650 10%
1656 11%
1672 12%
1724 15%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
1735 16%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
1788 19%
...
19434 1198%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 2995%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 159203     avg: 231970     median: 210648 (21%)     max: 375145 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 35612     avg: 83732     median: 77853 (9%)     max: 168062 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 9231     avg: 19310     median: 19112 (18%)     max: 31884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13162     avg: 26618     median: 27028 (7%)     max: 39880 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2096     avg: 4486     median: 4684 (7%)     max: 6229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2286     avg: 4931     median: 5147 (5%)     max: 6624 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35195     avg: 106330     median: 94996 (11%)     max: 245293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
16789 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
28890 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 8379     avg: 11281     median: 11469 (6%)     max: 14527 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2054     avg: 3545     median: 3692 (4%)     max: 4304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 10094     avg: 14970     median: 15010 (14%)     max: 21714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 11724     avg: 18060     median: 19106 (7%)     max: 24384 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2897     avg: 6717     median: 6896 (8%)     max: 8500 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2867     avg: 6362     median: 6523.5 (5%)     max: 7676 Points
171.8 -97%
...
5885 -7%
5932 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
5939 -7%
5990 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
6033 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
6071 -5%
6074 -5%
6142 -3%
AMD Radeon 660M
6315 -1%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
6362
6407 1%
6422 1%
6454 1%
6638 4%
6736 6%
AMD Radeon Pro 460
6749 6%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
6817 7%
AMD Radeon R9 M390
6819 7%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
6894 8%
...
59943 842%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1940%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 16744     avg: 24873     median: 25686 (7%)     max: 33312 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 15353     avg: 21641     median: 22199 (12%)     max: 28500 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
19829 -8%
AMD Radeon 660M
20101 -7%
20346 -6%
20547 -5%
20575 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
20876 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
21102 -2%
21237 -2%
21394 -1%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
21641
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
21687 0%
21740 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
21759 1%
22986 6%
23042 6%
23092 7%
23936 11%
23989 11%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
24205 12%
...
132443 512%
max:
173912 704%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 23832     avg: 36306     median: 37365 (41%)     max: 50056 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
29690 -18%
29851 -18%
30785 -15%
31017 -15%
31647 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
31699 -13%
32434 -11%
33386 -8%
35662 -2%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36306
AMD Radeon 610M
36628 1%
36878 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
38073 5%
38999 7%
39066 8%
43138 19%
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 20%
AMD Radeon 680M
43633 20%
...
69623 92%
max:
87172 140%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
24558 points (32%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 30156     avg: 34305     median: 34304.5 (45%)     max: 38453 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 17626     avg: 28463     median: 28276 (37%)     max: 34555 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 11.3     avg: 14.9     median: 15.1 (5%)     max: 20 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
23.1 fps (4%)
0.6 -97%
...
AMD Radeon R7 M340
19.8 -14%
19.95 -14%
20.3 -12%
20.4 -12%
20.93 -9%
21.2 -8%
21.2 -8%
22 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 -4%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.1
23.35 1%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
23.4 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
23.87 3%
24 4%
24 4%
24.01 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
25.4 10%
26 13%
...
532 2203%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 37.3     avg: 44.7     median: 45.9 (11%)     max: 53.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 2.85     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 4 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15     avg: 18.5     median: 17.9 (3%)     max: 24.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 8.13     avg: 11.7     median: 11.9 (3%)     max: 14.5 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 30.4     avg: 39.9     median: 39.8 (11%)     max: 51.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.32     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.92 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 7.28     avg: 17.1     median: 9.6 (4%)     max: 30 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.2     avg: 37.6     median: 38.5 (6%)     max: 41.7 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 30.1     avg: 39.6     median: 40.2 (6%)     max: 46.7 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 11.66     avg: 51.7     median: 55.8 (15%)     max: 63.7 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.16     avg: 6.4     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 7.03 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 14.8     avg: 18.8     median: 18.2 (3%)     max: 25 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 8.47     avg: 14     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 16 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 34.3     avg: 45.4     median: 45.5 (5%)     max: 58.4 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 3.35     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (1%)     max: 4.72 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 3.38     avg: 35.7     median: 38.4 (6%)     max: 46.2 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 42.5     avg: 54.3     median: 55.5 (6%)     max: 61 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 30     avg: 39.4     median: 40 (6%)     max: 46.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
19.1 fps (4%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.98     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.99 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 6.37     avg: 8     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 9.13 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 49.8     avg: 62.5     median: 63.3 (7%)     max: 68.8 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 4.02     avg: 4.4     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 4.63 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 23.6     avg: 27.1     median: 27.5 (9%)     max: 28.7 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 12.5     avg: 13     median: 13.1 (6%)     max: 13.8 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 13.4     avg: 15.4     median: 15.7 (4%)     max: 16.1 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 3.61     avg: 7.2     median: 6.9 (2%)     max: 14 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 4.98     avg: 6.3     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 2.03     avg: 3.2     median: 2.7 (2%)     max: 6.02 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 20.4     avg: 28.5     median: 24.7 (4%)     max: 55.9 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 2.4     avg: 3.6     median: 3.1 (0%)     max: 7.39 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 12.4     avg: 16.4     median: 15.3 (7%)     max: 24.1 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 7.02     avg: 8.6     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 12.2 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 7.54     avg: 10.2     median: 9.8 (3%)     max: 14.1 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 13392     avg: 16275     median: 15590.5 (11%)     max: 22008 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 9.11     avg: 75.7     median: 76.7 (25%)     max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 35.84     avg: 96.8     median: 98.3 (6%)     max: 136.33 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
14 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 44.9     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 57.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 84     avg: 112.4     median: 104.3 (8%)     max: 153 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 94.2     median: 91.8 (10%)     max: 111.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 108.3     avg: 126.7     median: 118.7 (3%)     max: 161 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 139     avg: 159.3     median: 164.4 (7%)     max: 174.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 256     avg: 257.7     median: 257.7 (2%)     max: 259.4 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 98.9     avg: 196.9     median: 136.3 (3%)     max: 1992 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 10.8     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 176.8 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 9240     avg: 15353     median: 15419.5 (4%)     max: 17590 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 13180     avg: 19560     median: 20133.5 (5%)     max: 23402 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 415     avg: 819     median: 684 (2%)     max: 2721 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 942     avg: 2224     median: 2299 (4%)     max: 3188 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 2693     avg: 3410     median: 3414.5 (3%)     max: 3877 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.2     avg: 41.1     median: 40 (5%)     max: 92.1 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.4     avg: 38.7     median: 36.7 (5%)     max: 78.2 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 22.8     avg: 41.2     median: 40 (9%)     max: 76.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
32.2 Watt (12%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.2127     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (31%)     max: 0.527 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.2055     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (31%)     max: 0.842 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 43.1     avg: 45.7     median: 45.3 (14%)     max: 48.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.1     avg: 53     median: 47.6 (6%)     max: 91.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.1382     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (29%)     max: 0.2687 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 24.3     avg: 38.4     median: 38.5 (62%)     max: 52.8 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1070     avg: 1224     median: 1200 (47%)     max: 1400 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 1100     avg: 1257     median: 1273.5 (50%)     max: 1400 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
18
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
40.4 43.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.4 37.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.6 26.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.7
med. 1920x1080
120 132.8 178 ~ 144 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.3 93.4 124.2 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.1 87.8 115.8 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
64.2 68.9 87.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.8 48.8 60.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.5 34.8 41.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.1 30.9 36.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
111.7