Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M 是适用于笔记本电脑的 Ryzen 7040 系列中的集成 GPU（Phoenix，例如 Ryzen 9 7940HS）。 iGPU 基于新的 RDNA3 架构，具有 12 个 CU（= 768 个着色器），主频高达 3 GHz（取决于 CPU 型号）。与前身 Radeon 680M 一样，780M 支持硬件光线追踪，但性能太慢，无法在当前游戏中使用。

得益于新的架构和更高的时钟速度，Radeon 780M 应该明显比旧的 Radeon 680M 更快。这意味着要求最高的游戏应该可以在最低图形设置下运行（例如《赛博朋克 2077》），而要求较低的游戏（例如《FIFA 23》）可以在更高的设置和分辨率 (1080p) 下运行。 2023 年初，Radeon 780M 成为市场上最快的 iGPU。

得益于现代 4 纳米工艺和巧妙的节能功能，功耗相对较低（根据 AMD 的说法）。前两种型号的整个芯片可配置在 15 - 54 瓦 TDP 之间。

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines768 - unified
TMUs48
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed1500 - 3000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 780MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G8 x 4200 MHz, 65 W2900 MHz? MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H8 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS8 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
» show 24 more
min. - max.? - 2900 MHz2700 - 2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.5 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 -8%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.23 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.29 -7%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.35 -5%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.35 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.4 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.41 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.43 -3%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.49 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.52
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.72 6%
Intel Arc A310
3.73 6%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.73 6%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.75 7%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3.82 9%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.95 12%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.98 13%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.07 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22.4 536%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 846%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 172     avg: 389.9     median: 433 (3%)     max: 490 Points
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 256     avg: 451.2     median: 492 (3%)     max: 519 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2447     avg: 2760     median: 2775 (6%)     max: 2972 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4696     avg: 14182     median: 15560.5 (8%)     max: 19818 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2548     avg: 4869     median: 4945 (6%)     max: 5972 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 7129     avg: 11015     median: 11795 (5%)     max: 12755 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4187     avg: 7040     median: 7376 (11%)     max: 8276 Points
+ 80 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4550     avg: 7612     median: 7982.5 (7%)     max: 8904 Points
+ 80 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 156574     avg: 243412     median: 233902 (26%)     max: 317851 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1707     avg: 2968     median: 3131 (8%)     max: 3541 Points
+ 80 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1496     avg: 2657     median: 2810.5 (6%)     max: 3196 Points
+ 80 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -17%
AMD Radeon 680M
2214 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -16%
AMD Radeon 760M
2260 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -13%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
2378 -11%
AMD Radeon 860M
2410 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
2472 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
2601 -2%
AMD Radeon 780M
2657
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 6%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
2825 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 8%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2881 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 9%
Intel Arc A350M
2993 13%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 13%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 776%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 1558%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 311361     avg: 405650     median: 425087 (43%)     max: 451929 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 113629     avg: 176631     median: 174940 (20%)     max: 226039 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22748     avg: 34037     median: 35532 (34%)     max: 39559 Points
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26646     avg: 45559     median: 48112 (12%)     max: 54549 Points
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 17909     avg: 26814     median: 28605 (27%)     max: 29856 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 18295     avg: 31699     median: 34041.5 (13%)     max: 37947 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7732     avg: 12064     median: 12475.5 (15%)     max: 14084 Points
+ 76 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7868     avg: 12294     median: 12775 (10%)     max: 14312 Points
+ 77 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
11286 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -7%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11701 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -3%
Intel Arc A310
11915 -3%
Intel Arc A370M
12066 -2%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
12289 0%
AMD Radeon 780M
12294
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
12334 0%
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
12417 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
12479 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
12583 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
12797 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12801 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13515 10%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
13524 10%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 455%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 956%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 26795     avg: 39439     median: 41400.5 (12%)     max: 44741 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 21873     avg: 34070     median: 35787.5 (20%)     max: 38818 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 41483     avg: 53563     median: 53787 (59%)     max: 64978 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 45874     avg: 45894     median: 45893.5 (60%)     max: 45913 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 29523     avg: 40740     median: 42265 (55%)     max: 45612 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 11.8     avg: 21.3     median: 22.6 (7%)     max: 25.4 fps
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 93     avg: 109.1     median: 113 (28%)     max: 128 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 55.6     avg: 71.4     median: 74.1 (11%)     max: 83.3 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22     avg: 28     median: 29.1 (5%)     max: 32 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 29.45     avg: 52.2     median: 54 (14%)     max: 65 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 58.1     avg: 68     median: 67.3 (18%)     max: 78.3 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 14.9     avg: 20.8     median: 19.1 (17%)     max: 40.9 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 39.8     avg: 52.1     median: 54.2 (22%)     max: 58 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 65     avg: 82.3     median: 86.6 (14%)     max: 99.5 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 67.5     avg: 81.5     median: 83.7 (13%)     max: 88.5 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 76.5     avg: 100.1     median: 100 (27%)     max: 118 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 72.1     avg: 124.8     median: 132.5 (15%)     max: 150 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 17     avg: 26.8     median: 27.1 (5%)     max: 31.8 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 50.1     avg: 68.5     median: 69.9 (12%)     max: 82.3 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 68.7     avg: 100.3     median: 104 (12%)     max: 116 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 14.4     avg: 21.7     median: 22.4 (7%)     max: 25.8 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 59.2     avg: 85.7     median: 87.9 (13%)     max: 95.8 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 82.8     avg: 115.6     median: 123.5 (14%)     max: 135 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 63.9     avg: 80     median: 81.7 (13%)     max: 88.9 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 47.09     avg: 62.3     median: 67.2 (12%)     max: 67.9 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 77.7     avg: 122.6     median: 131.6 (15%)     max: 149 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 21.6     avg: 36.8     median: 37 (10%)     max: 51.5 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 67.6     avg: 111.7     median: 121.7 (13%)     max: 134 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 14.3     avg: 21     median: 22.4 (4%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 36.4     avg: 52.9     median: 56.4 (19%)     max: 62.2 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 23.4     avg: 32.8     median: 35.7 (17%)     max: 38.9 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 18.5     avg: 33.1     median: 36 (10%)     max: 39.9 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 17.4     avg: 24.4     median: 25.3 (6%)     max: 27.2 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 33.2     avg: 57.1     median: 61.3 (6%)     max: 67 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 6.86     avg: 12.1     median: 12.6 (8%)     max: 17.4 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 25.9     avg: 43.5     median: 47 (7%)     max: 51.2 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 8.17     avg: 16.5     median: 15.1 (3%)     max: 31 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 17.4     avg: 29.4     median: 31.1 (14%)     max: 35.6 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 14.9     avg: 22.2     median: 24.2 (16%)     max: 25.3 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 10.3     avg: 18.9     median: 20.7 (7%)     max: 22.1 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11162     avg: 15881     median: 16328 (12%)     max: 18678 points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
0 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 117.1     avg: 185.9     median: 191.7 (11%)     max: 253 fps
+ 75 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 99.6 %
+ 75 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.7     avg: 34.7     median: 27.1 (10%)     max: 88.9 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 37.7     avg: 57.2     median: 60.3 (11%)     max: 63.6 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -94%
...
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
45.07 -21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -16%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -13%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -13%
AMD Radeon 860M
51.3 -10%
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 -10%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -8%
AMD Radeon 840M
56 -2%
AMD Radeon 780M
57.2
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
57.6 1%
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
61.4 7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 10%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
62.7 10%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 10%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
62.9 10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 12%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 13%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 13%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 827%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 135.5     median: 146.7 (11%)     max: 156.6 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 105.4     avg: 154.9     median: 161.7 (15%)     max: 174.8 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 151.8     avg: 206.4     median: 220.5 (5%)     max: 230.3 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 188.8     avg: 281.2     median: 299.3 (12%)     max: 308.8 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 392.4     avg: 546     median: 568.9 (5%)     max: 619.9 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 49.9     avg: 160.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 446 fps
+ 67 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 7.9     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 38.8 fps
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 15316     avg: 28324     median: 28737 (7%)     max: 33077 points
+ 75 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 28650     median: 29789 (7%)     max: 35544 points
+ 73 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 575     avg: 968     median: 922 (3%)     max: 2627 Samples/s
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 991     avg: 1650     median: 1546 (3%)     max: 2380 Samples/s
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5728     avg: 8865     median: 9494 (8%)     max: 10495 points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.4     avg: 63.5     median: 64.4 (9%)     max: 106 Watt
+ 70 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 58.2     median: 57.8 (8%)     max: 84 Watt
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 33.3     avg: 57.6     median: 54.5 (12%)     max: 83.5 Watt
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.2407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (43%)     max: 0.754 fps per Watt
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.301     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (41%)     max: 0.797 fps per Watt
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 37.6     avg: 56.2     median: 53.4 (15%)     max: 81.3 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.8     avg: 67.5     median: 67.7 (9%)     max: 104.4 Watt
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.1912     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.506 fps per Watt
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 32.4     avg: 40.3     median: 40.3 (58%)     max: 47 dB(A)
+ 41 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

007 First Light

007 First Light

2026
low 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
War Thunder

War Thunder

2026
low 1920x1080
165  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Death Stranding 2

Death Stranding 2

2026
low 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Portable Preset FSR Balanced 1920x1080
37.4
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset + FSR Balanced 1920x1080
35
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

2025
low 1920x1080
66.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Outer Worlds 2

The Outer Worlds 2

2025
low 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6

2025
low 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
low 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
45.7 49.6 59.9 71 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 38.9 48.6 56.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3 30.1 36.6 45.6 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
6.5
6.4
6.1
6.3
Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
40.4 41.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Assassin's Creed Shadows

Assassin's Creed Shadows

2025
low 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Civilization 7

Civilization 7

2025
low 1920x1080
66.7 78.2 89.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.6 36.6 43.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9 22.1 22.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

2025
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation 1920x1080
36.3
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
18 24.4 29.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4 19.4 24.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.4 16.3 20.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9 15.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
42.7
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

2024
low 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Marvel Rivals

Marvel Rivals

2024
low 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
12.3 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.3 14.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.3 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.2
Call of Duty Black Ops 6

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

2024
low 1920x1080
31 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 43 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 30 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
82
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
27.4 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.8 12.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.1
EA Sports FC 25

EA Sports FC 25

2024
low 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Settings 1280x720
116.6
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
34.6
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
26
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
14 21.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.5 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
31.7
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
7.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
20.1
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
21 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
49
low FSR 68 1280x720
59
Once Human

Once Human

2024
low 1920x1080
39.3 39.3 49.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.2 26.6 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.7 21.6 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 19.1 25.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
71.8
77.3
96.1
The First Descendant

The First Descendant

2024
low 1920x1080
44.3 59.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9 37.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.8 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.9 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
71.9
98.1
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
43.3 44.8 45.5 47 53.6 67.4 68 68.3 69 73 75.9 76.8 78.7 81.3 82 82.3 82.8 83.4 83.4 83.4 83.6 84 85.4 85.9 87.2 89.4 90.9 90.9 91.5 92.1 94.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.4 37.1 38.3 40.2 41.2 49.1 58.7 59.6 61.1 62.6 63.8 64.4 65 67.8 69.4 70.7 70.9 71.9 72.1 72.6 72.8 73.3 73.3 74.5 75.5 75.6 77 78.2 78.3 79 80.1 80.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3 27.1 30.9 31.3 41.7 43.2 43.8 46 46.3 46.6 47.3 48.8 50.3 51.3 51.4 51.7 52.3 53.7 54.1 54.2 54.4 55.1 55.4 55.8 56.2 57 57.7 57.7 58.8 59.5 59.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4 9.5 9.6 10.1 10.3 11.1 11.5 11.7 12 12.3 12.6 12.6 13 13.4 13.5 13.9 13.9 14.4 14.5 14.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.3 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.2 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
10.6 26.9 32.5 32.5 33.3 34.9 36.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5 21.4 24.6 25.6 26.5 28.3 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 18.8 21.4 21.8 23 25.3 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 11.8 14.9 16.3 16.7 19.7 20.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
27.7 28.5 29.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.6 25.2 26 27.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5 17.7 18.7 24.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
42.6
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
65.5 75 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.3 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
94.8
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
0 (!)
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
38.4 46.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
90.4
95
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
34 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
52
57
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
23 30.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
37.6
48.8
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
16.8 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6 20.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10 14.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
29.1
45.9
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
37.9 46.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.3 39.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
72.6
87.5
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
141.1 158.4 173.5 175.6 175.8 178.2 179.9 ~ 169 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.2 127.7 134.9 134.9 137.7 139.4 143 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 120.2 127.1 128.9 130.5 133 135.5 ~ 126 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
52.7 57.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.8 53.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.4 51.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 34.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
70.2 76.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.7 58.5 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.8 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.6 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
119.9
125.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
15 19 25 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 17 22 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 14 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
37
23
30
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
52 56 68 68 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 50 57 61 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29 36 38 45 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 31 37 41 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
101
122
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
30.6 42.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 25.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
76.9
99.3
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
22.4 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.6 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.7
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
24 33.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.4 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.3 9.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
58.3
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
77.1 81.9 87.1 87.9 89.5 89.6 89.9 90.8 92.2 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.8 62.1 65.1 65.6 68 68.6 71.6 75.5 75.6 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2 38.6 40.4 42.7 43.8 54.1 58.1 61 61.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 30.3 32 34.7 42.5 46.9 53.9 55.2 55.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
154.3
159.8
142
162.8
147.8
165.3
144.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
62
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
101.2 107.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.6 98.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73 78.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 71.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
169.1
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
102.4 134.8 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.4 96.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7 61.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 38.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
126.1
167.8
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
23.9 24.7 25.2 25.7 25.7 29.3 30 32.5 32.6 32.7 32.8 33.1 33.8 33.9 34 34.3 35.5 36.1 36.5 37.3 37.8 38 38.3 38.5 38.5 38.7 39.1 39.2 39.2 40.4 40.5 40.5 41 41.3 41.4 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.9 42 42.4 42.4 42.6 42.8 42.9 43.4 43.5 43.6 43.8 43.9 44 44.1 44.5 44.5 44.6 44.7 45 45.4 45.4 46.3 46.3 47.9 52.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3 19.6 20.3 20.4 20.8 21 23.3 23.7 23.9 24.8 24.9 25.7 26.1 26.4 26.5 26.5 27.8 28.1 28.5 28.6 29.4 29.5 29.5 29.7 29.9 29.9 30.3 30.6 31 31.1 31.7 31.8 31.8 31.8 32.2 32.3 32.6 32.9 33.1 33.2 33.4 33.4 33.4 33.7 33.9 33.9 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.5 34.9 35 35 35.1 35.2 35.6 35.7 36.3 37.5 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8 15.1 15.6 15.7 15.9 18.6 19.6 20.1 20.7 21 21.4 21.4 21.5 21.9 22.1 22.1 22.4 22.6 23.1 23.5 23.6 23.6 23.7 23.7 23.8 23.8 24.1 24.2 24.8 24.9 25 25 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.8 25.8 25.9 26.3 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.5 26.7 26.9 26.9 27.1 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.4 27.7 27.7 27.8 28.2 29 29.2 29.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5 13.6 13.7 14 14.3 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.8 18.2 18.6 18.7 18.8 18.9 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.5 19.8 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.4 20.4 20.5 20.9 21.5 21.5 21.7 21.7 21.8 21.8 21.9 22 22.4 22.6 22.9 23 23.3 23.4 23.4 23.5 23.5 23.6 23.6 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 25.8 25.8 26.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
74.1
53.9
70.4
62.7
59.6
77.4
76.4
61.7
58.5
73.4
80.6
55.4
69.7
53.6
60.6
72.6
76.3
69
69.1
65.2
62.8
62.9
77.9
73.6
69.6
71
41.8
74.4
43.8
57.9
73.6
70.3
72.2
55.9
70.3
42.1
41.9
61
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
4.8
3.9
5.2
7.1
7.6
4.9
5.5
7.4
3.9
Steam Deck 1280x800
58.5
55.1
52.2
52.2
40.6
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
26.2
31.6
23.1
33.3
30.6
29.5
30
17.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.9
18
21.7
21.6
21.6
22.4
18.1
20.7
19.2
21.6
22.4
16.3
20.4
20.7
20.7
20.2
19
20
20.7
24.2
23
17.2
22.9
13
23
14.1
21.1
14.6
15.1
17.7
23.5
22.3
22.8
16.5
20.5
22.2
13.6
12.5
17.5
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2 20.3 20.4 23 23.6 23.7 24.8 25.4 30.2 30.6 31 31.3 32.4 33 33.1 33.3 33.9 34.9 35 37.2 38 38.5 38.6 38.6 39.1 39.2 39.2 39.4 39.6 39.9 40.1 40.5 40.8 41 41.1 41.2 41.6 41.7 41.7 42 42.4 42.5 42.8 43 43.3 43.9 44.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7 15.7 15.8 18.2 19 19.4 19.5 19.9 23.5 24.2 24.3 25.4 25.6 25.7 26.1 26.3 27.4 27.5 27.6 28.5 28.7 29.8 29.9 30 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.8 30.9 31.2 31.4 31.5 31.5 31.6 31.7 32.1 32.3 32.7 32.9 33 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 34.8 36.1 36.5 36.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.3 13.8 13.8 14.7 15 15.6 16 16.2 19.9 20.5 20.6 20.9 21.1 21.2 21.6 21.7 22.1 22.2 22.6 22.9 23.7 24.5 24.7 24.9 24.9 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.7 25.8 26 26 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.3 26.6 26.6 26.6 27 27 27.1 27.5 27.5 27.6 28.1 28.9 29.7 29.9 30.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8 13.4 13.5 14.2 14.3 15.2 15.7 16.1 19.2 20.2 20.2 20.3 20.5 20.6 20.7 21.2 21.2 21.2 21.9 22.2 23.7 24 24.3 24.4 24.5 24.6 24.6 24.6 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.7 25.7 25.8 25.9 26 26 26.2 26.5 26.7 26.9 27 27 27 27.2 28 28.7 29.2 29.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
56.3
65.7
51.3
65.5
64.7
30.7
60.3
45.8
48.9
63.4
67.4
60.8
65.9
66.7
60.5
57
58.2
59.7
65.8
64.7
62.3
61.2
35.2
67.6
50.1
61
64.8
59.8
49.9
64.9
65.9
38.5
34.7
52.9
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
42.2
40.3
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
51 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.3 37.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
90.2
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
26 27 30.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22 23 26.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19 19 21.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15 16 19.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45
Armored Core 6

Armored Core 6

2023
low 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Immortals of Aveum

Immortals of Aveum

2023
low 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atlas Fallen

Atlas Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

2023
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7 20.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
42.4 43.2 44.9 58.9 67.3 69.9 72.1 73.2 74.1 75.3 75.4 76 76.6 78.7 79.3 79.4 81.2 81.6 82 83.2 85.5 85.9 89.6 89.8 90.3 90.8 92.1 93.8 94.5 95.4 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1 38.6 39.9 52.4 54.4 61.4 62.5 63.4 64.5 65.8 65.9 65.9 67 70.2 70.6 71.2 72.3 72.4 72.7 75.5 76.4 76.7 79 79 80.3 80.6 83.1 83.6 84.3 84.4 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3 28.4 29.1 38.9 43.7 43.8 44.1 44.1 45.6 46.1 48.1 48.2 49.2 49.9 50 51.3 51.6 51.8 52.5 52.7 53 53.8 56.5 56.6 57.2 57.6 57.8 59.8 60.8 60.9 61.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 7.6 8.9 9.6 10 10 10.6 11.3 11.6 11.6 11.9 12.1 12.2 13 13 13.6 13.9 13.9 13.9 14.5 14.6 14.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.9 7.4 8.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
127.3
74.7
123.1
108.5
98.9
110.7
155
130.9
154.4
133.5
139.3
75.8
137.8
124.6
122
151.1
130.6
150
151.3
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.1
Star Wars Jedi Survivor

Star Wars Jedi Survivor

2023
low 1920x1080
22.7 23.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20 20.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 18.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Ray Tracing 1920x1080
8.7
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 4 Remake

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3

2023
low 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sons of the Forest

Sons of the Forest

2023
low 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atomic Heart

Atomic Heart

2023
low 1920x1080
40.4 58.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6 46 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1 27.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6 21.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
98.9
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
22 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
42
Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy

2023
low 1920x1080
29.8 35.2 37.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.9 24.8 26.2 36 37.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.7 19.4 19.5 26.3 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.7 14.8 14.9 21.1 22.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
14.9 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Space Remake

Dead Space Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Witcher 3 v4

The Witcher 3 v4

2023
low 1920x1080
41.2 52.6 52.6 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.3 37.2 42.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.4 30.9 36.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4 24.6 32 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
91
78.7
High On Life

High On Life

2023
low 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Callisto Protocol

The Callisto Protocol

2022
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed Unbound

Need for Speed Unbound

2022
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Spider-Man Miles Morales

Spider-Man Miles Morales

2022
low 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022

2022
low 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
A Plague Tale Requiem

A Plague Tale Requiem

2022
low 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Quarry

The Quarry

2022
low 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
47 62.3 65.4 68.2 68.9 70.2 72.2 75.3 77 77.6 79 79.7 80.4 80.6 82.6 83.5 84.2 86.6 88.3 92.5 94.2 94.6 94.8 94.9 94.9 96.9 98.8 98.9 99 99.5 99.6 99.8 99.8 107.3 109.9 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.5 52.7 58.4 59.3 60 62.1 65.2 67.5 68.3 68.4 70.2 71 71.3 72.5 72.9 74.3 74.7 77.3 77.9 80.7 82.7 83.6 83.6 85.1 85.4 85.7 85.9 85.9 86.7 87.6 88.4 88.4 89.8 93.3 95 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.7 40.2 42.6 43.7 45.3 46 46.6 50.3 50.5 50.5 51.8 52 52.6 53.6 54.2 54.8 55.2 56.7 57.9 61.5 62.2 62.3 62.6 63 64.6 64.8 65.1 65.4 65.6 66.2 66.3 66.6 66.7 69.1 70.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9 11.4 11.6 12 12.4 12.8 13.3 13.6 13.9 14 14.3 14.6 15.1 16.9 17.6 17.7 17.8 17.9 17.9 18 18.2 18.4 18.4 18.5 18.5 19.2 19.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
133.5
152.8
100.4
166.2
151.3
85.4
143.8
121.8
164.2
133.2
106.1
112.5
163.5
141.8
171.9
149.8
170
172.5
143.9
126.9
167.9
186.7
160.6
128.2
111.8
145.7
130.7
132.1
179.5
172.2
Vampire Bloodhunt

Vampire Bloodhunt

2022
low 1920x1080
84.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ghostwire Tokyo

Ghostwire Tokyo

2022
low 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9 43.2 43.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.3 38.2 45.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.4 41.2 45 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.2 26.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
34.3 44.3 48.2 48.8 49.8 51.6 55.8 60.4 62 62.6 62.7 63.4 63.4 63.7 64.7 65.8 71.6 72 72.8 73.8 73.9 74.6 74.9 76.9 77.7 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.4 28.6 36.2 37.1 38 39.9 39.9 42.5 44.8 44.8 45.6 46.8 47 47.1 47.4 49.1 52 52.2 52.8 53.3 53.4 54.7 54.7 55.9 55.9 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.6 21.4 24 24.9 26.3 27.5 29.8 29.9 30.2 30.4 31.5 32 32 32.7 33.3 34.5 36.6 36.7 36.8 37.1 37.1 37.4 37.8 37.9 38.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5 17.2 19.5 19.8 22.2 23.8 23.9 24.1 25 25.2 25.2 25.3 26.5 27.1 28.1 29.5 29.6 29.6 29.8 30 30.2 30.3 30.3 30.6 31.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
116.9
128.4
131.4
140.6
111.8
62.6
87.8
151.2
108.8
98.6
118.1
139
147.5
116.3
97.4
130.8
142.1
126.3
84.3
84.1
127.9
121
110.1
136.6
152.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

2022
low 1920x1080
22 26.3 26.7 30 38 38.6 39.3 39.5 42 43.9 44.6 53.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 20.7 20.8 25 29.9 30.2 30.9 31.2 34 34.6 36.3 42 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 15.1 17.3 20 24 24.4 24.4 24.6 25 26.9 28.6 30.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 15.9 22.3 23 23.3 24.8 25.2 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
88.6
75
56.7
71.5
65.5
43.1
43
GRID Legends

GRID Legends

2022
low 1920x1080
73.5 93.4 102.1 103.4 104.4 105.7 106.1 117.3 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.4 74.6 80.5 81 81.7 82.3 86.3 92.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.3 55.5 56.4 61 62.3 62.5 62.5 68.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.8 42 42.4 46.7 48.4 49.2 49.4 52.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
141.6
150.6
139.5
112
136.1
115.9
141.4
136.2
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

2022
med. 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
48.1
Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2

2022
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Extraction

Rainbow Six Extraction

2022
low 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
God of War

God of War

2022
low 1920x1080
24.7 27.5 32 34.8 39.2 39.9 42.3 42.6 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5 22.5 25.8 29 31.7 32.5 34.1 34.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2 17.9 20.5 22.8 25.6 25.7 27.2 27.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.3 12.8 15.1 17.4 18.1 18.1 18.3 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.8
54.5
56.5
62.2
55.9
45.2
57
Farming Simulator 22

Farming Simulator 22

2021
low 1280x720
133.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
126.2
Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5

2021
low 1280x720
66 100 102 106 113 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 61 65 74 78 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 56 60 62 69 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 19 31 32 36 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
77.1 80 83 84.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43 45.1 47.2 48 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 37.9 39.1 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30 34.3 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
50
53.1
55.2
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
112.6 163.3 169.6 182.4 190.3 191.7 196.8 197.8 204 207 216 219 223 225 225 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9 73.2 81.9 84.8 91 93.7 96.2 100.1 102.4 104.9 104.9 105.5 110.1 113 113.4 115 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.6 55.4 64.2 65.1 69.9 72 75.4 77 78.4 79.5 79.9 80.9 80.9 84.5 86.5 87.1 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 24.6 26.6 27.6 29 30 31.5 31.5 32.3 34.4 34.6 34.9 35.9 36 36.5 37.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

2020
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Star Wars Squadrons

Star Wars Squadrons

2020
low 1280x720
167.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

2020
med. 1920x1080
41 48 51 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 37 42 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 37 38 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22 23 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
177.5 178.1 184.7 194.4 197.3 199.1 201 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.9 87.8 94.7 96.9 100.2 100.3 101.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7 69.3 73.6 76.4 78.7 79.3 79.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.2 46 52.4 53.2 54 54.3 54.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
135.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
115.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom Eternal

Doom Eternal

2020
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
low 1280x720
72.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
75.7 80.5 90.4 97.3 100.3 100.5 101.9 102.5 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.6 42.8 43.7 45.2 46 48.6 50.3 51.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.8 27.8 28.4 29 30.2 31.7 32.7 33.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22 22.2 23.1 23.4 24.3 25.3 26 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
70
78.6
63.4
65.2
76.6
65.2
71.8
74.9
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
106.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
145.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
64 64 70 72 74 75 75 76 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42 43 43 44 44 46 47 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40 41 41 41 41 44 44 45 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37 38 38 38 39 41 41 42 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
low 1280x720
76.6 81.1 83.1 86.9 89 89.2 90.7 92.5 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.2 34.3 34.5 35.8 37 37.4 37.4 37.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25 25.3 26.6 27.5 27.9 28.7 28.7 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 20.9 22 23 23.8 23.8 24.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
61 65.9 88 91 94.1 95.5 96.7 97 100 100 101.2 103.8 104 106.4 109.2 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5 27 36 37.1 39.8 40 40.3 41 41 42 42.9 43 43 43.3 43.3 44.5 45.6 46 47 48 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.4 24 32 32 32.1 36.2 36.3 37.7 38 38 39.4 39.5 40 40.3 41 41.2 42 42 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 21 22.4 27 31.2 31.5 33 33 33 33.8 33.9 35 35 35.1 35.3 35.6 36 37 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
62
67
77
58.9
68.1
71.5
71
42.8
72.1
72.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
74.1 77.8 83.3 86 88 129.1 130.5 134.7 138.2 138.9 139.8 139.8 140.2 140.6 141 141.9 141.9 143.2 145.5 145.7 147.5 147.5 147.6 148.8 149.3 150.4 150.5 151.1 153 155 156.3 157.4 158.3 158.5 159.7 161.1 161.1 161.3 162.3 163.2 163.6 164 165.3 166.4 166.4 166.8 167.7 167.8 168.4 168.5 168.8 169 170 170.5 172.1 173.7 175.1 175.9 178.9 185.2 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.7 33.3 34.8 34.9 46.2 52.5 53.8 56.8 58.5 58.8 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.8 59.9 60.3 60.6 60.8 61 61.1 61.2 61.5 62.4 62.6 63.4 64.3 64.4 64.4 64.8 64.9 65.2 65.2 65.3 65.4 65.5 65.6 65.6 65.7 66 66.4 66.4 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.9 67.1 67.6 67.8 67.8 67.9 68 68 68.1 68.2 68.9 69 70.1 70.4 70.9 72.5 73.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3 28.9 29.7 30.2 38.8 43.8 45.3 47 49.2 49.4 49.5 49.6 49.7 49.8 50.2 50.4 50.5 50.7 51 51.3 51.5 51.9 52.5 52.8 53 53.3 53.3 53.4 53.9 54 54.8 55.3 55.4 55.6 55.7 55.8 55.8 56 56.1 56.5 56.5 56.6 56.9 56.9 56.9 57 57 57.3 57.8 57.8 57.9 58 58 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.7 59.7 60 60.6 62.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5 25 25.9 26.4 32.8 37.3 38 39.9 41.3 41.7 42 42.2 42.6 42.6 42.8 43 43 43.3 43.4 43.7 44 44.1 44.6 45.1 45.1 45.2 45.4 45.6 45.6 45.7 46.3 46.6 46.7 46.9 47.1 47.7 48.1 48.2 48.2 48.2 48.4 48.6 48.7 48.7 48.8 49 49 49 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.3 49.5 49.6 49.7 49.9 50 50.8 51.2 51.6 52.1 53.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.9 31.7 32.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.3 16.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
42 47 47 48 53 58 60 62 63 65 66 69 69 69 71 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 77 78 78 78 80 83 84 84 84 86 86 87 88 88 88 88 89 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22 24 25 28 34 35 35 36 36 37 38 38 39 39 39 39 40 40 41 42 42 43 44 45 45 45 45 46 46 46 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 49 49 49 49 50 51 51 51 51 53 54 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21 22 23 26 32 32 32 33 33 34 35 36 36 36 36 36 37 37 39 39 39 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 47 49 49 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21 21 22 24 29 30 30 31 31 33 33 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 36 37 37 37 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 45 45 45 45 46 47 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
23 27 27 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
51
42
58
24
52
52
56
54
55
53
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
39 39.3 40 42 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.5 45.7 45.8 45.9 46.2 47.1 47.1 47.3 47.3 47.5 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.8 47.8 47.9 48 48.1 48.5 48.7 48.8 48.8 48.9 49.1 49.2 49.9 50.3 50.8 51.2 51.9 52.8 53 53.1 53.3 53.4 53.6 53.7 54 54 54.1 54.8 55 55.3 56.2 57 57.2 57.8 58.6 60 60.2 60.3 60.3 60.8 60.8 61.1 61.2 62.6 62.8 64.2 64.2 64.4 64.5 64.9 65.4 65.6 65.7 65.9 65.9 66.1 66.3 66.8 67.6 69.1 69.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 27.1 27.5 28.6 29.9 30.1 31 32.1 32.8 33 33.1 33.1 33.2 33.5 33.9 34.5 34.6 34.8 35.2 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.7 35.8 35.9 36.2 36.5 36.5 36.6 37 37.3 37.5 37.7 37.8 37.8 38 38.1 38.4 38.4 39 39.3 39.3 39.3 40.2 40.5 40.6 40.7 40.9 41.1 41.1 41.2 41.3 42.3 43 43.1 43.5 43.7 43.8 44.1 44.4 44.5 44.9 45 45.3 45.7 45.7 46.3 46.7 46.8 47.1 47.1 47.3 47.5 47.8 47.8 47.8 48 48.1 48.2 48.9 49.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.5 25.4 26.2 26.6 26.7 27.1 27.4 27.6 27.8 27.9 27.9 28 28.1 28.2 28.2 28.4 29 29 29 29.1 29.1 29.4 29.5 29.6 29.7 29.9 30.3 30.3 30.5 30.9 31 31.1 31.3 31.3 31.5 31.5 31.8 32.2 32.3 32.3 32.4 32.8 32.9 33.1 33.2 33.8 33.8 34 34.1 34.8 35.2 35.2 35.4 35.9 36.1 36.5 36.5 37 37.5 37.5 38 38.1 38.7 38.8 39.2 39.4 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.7 39.8 39.9 40.1 40.1 40.6 40.6 40.6 40.7 41.4 41.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.2 33.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

2018
low 1280x720
82.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
41.1 41.8 42.6 43.9 44.1 44.4 44.7 46.6 50.5 54.3 54.4 56.6 57.7 60.5 62.6 63.2 64.5 66.1 66.6 66.6 67 67.9 68.6 68.8 69.2 69.7 69.8 70.3 70.4 70.6 71.1 71.2 71.3 72.3 72.7 73.2 73.4 73.6 73.6 73.6 73.9 74 74.3 74.4 74.9 75.1 75.2 75.6 75.8 76 76.5 77.6 77.6 77.7 77.9 77.9 77.9 78 78 78.3 78.4 78.4 78.6 78.7 79.1 79.3 79.3 79.7 80.7 80.8 81.1 81.9 83.8 84.5 84.9 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.5 21 21.1 21.6 22 22.2 22.6 23.6 24 25.1 27.4 30.5 32.3 32.3 32.6 32.7 33.3 33.4 33.6 34 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.8 34.9 35.2 35.2 35.3 35.6 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.9 36 36.2 36.4 36.4 36.5 36.5 36.6 36.9 37.2 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.6 37.8 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.3 38.3 38.3 38.5 38.7 38.7 38.7 38.8 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.3 39.3 39.3 39.6 39.7 39.7 40.2 40.9 41.5 42.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6 15.9 16 16.1 16.3 16.3 16.5 17.7 19.3 19.5 21.2 22.5 23.7 23.8 24.1 24.2 24.4 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.8 25 25 25.2 25.2 25.6 25.7 25.7 25.8 25.9 26 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.7 26.9 27 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.3 27.5 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.7 27.8 28 28 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.3 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 28.9 28.9 29 29.2 29.3 29.3 29.4 29.4 30 30.1 30.5 30.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11.4 17.7 18.8 19.3 20.1 20.3 20.9 20.9 21 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
34.7 103.7 107.9 108.7 110.4 112.4 113.7 114.3 114.4 115.1 115.2 116.4 116.5 116.9 117.4 117.5 118.1 118.5 119.3 120.7 121.3 122.7 122.9 123.7 125.1 125.3 127 127.1 127.2 127.8 128 128 128.1 128.5 131 133 133.2 134.1 134.5 134.8 136.1 137.4 138.2 141.3 142 144.6 145.2 146.3 147.8 148.3 148.3 148.4 149.4 149.8 150.1 150.2 150.2 151.2 151.3 151.9 152.2 152.7 154 154.1 155.1 155.8 155.8 156.9 157.5 158.9 159.5 159.7 160.1 160.6 161.2 161.5 161.5 163 163.1 164.8 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6 84.3 87.5 89.5 89.6 89.9 90.2 90.4 91.1 92.7 93.3 93.7 93.9 94.2 94.3 94.9 95 95.4 96 96.1 96.6 96.7 98.1 98.2 101.4 101.5 102 102.4 102.7 103.7 105.2 105.3 105.8 106.9 107.1 108.1 108.1 108.4 108.4 108.5 108.8 108.8 108.9 109.2 109.2 109.7 110.1 110.5 111.7 111.9 112.6 112.6 113.9 114.1 115.6 116.1 116.1 117 117.7 117.9 117.9 118.3 119.3 120.6 120.7 121.1 121.1 122.7 122.9 123.3 123.9 124.8 125 126 126.5 127.5 127.9 130.1 130.1 130.2 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.6 36.5 45.8 54.9 56 57.9 61.1 62.7 62.8 63.1 63.8 65 65.3 65.4 65.8 66.7 66.8 67.8 69 73 73.8 74.1 74.5 75 75.9 76.2 76.2 76.4 76.9 77.9 77.9 79.9 80.3 80.4 80.5 80.6 80.6 81.5 81.9 82.1 82.2 82.9 83.1 83.8 83.9 83.9 84.1 84.8 85.6 85.9 86.1 86.5 86.6 86.9 87.6 88 88.2 88.3 88.9 89.8 89.9 90 91 91.7 92.1 92.5 93.2 94.8 95.1 95.5 95.6 95.9 96.7 96.8 97.5 98.4 98.8 98.8 98.9 100.9 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 34.4 42.9 51.3 51.5 53.1 55 56.4 57 58.2 58.4 58.6 59.7 59.9 60.4 61.4 62 62.2 62.6 64.6 65.4 65.8 66.7 66.7 67 68.9 69.1 69.5 69.9 70.1 70.5 70.6 71 71.2 71.6 71.6 71.7 71.9 72.2 72.2 73.2 73.2 74.5 74.6 75 75.1 75.5 76.2 76.2 76.4 76.8 77.7 78.1 78.1 78.6 78.7 79.2 80.2 80.3 81 81.2 81.3 81.5 82.3 83.1 83.2 83.9 85 85.1 85.5 85.6 86.5 87.4 87.5 88.1 88.2 88.5 89.7 90.4 91.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
74 74.4 80.9 83.1 109.8 116.7 117.3 119 119 119.8 120.3 122.4 122.5 126.7 129 129.2 129.5 131 135.1 136.2 137 138 140 140.3 142 143.1 145.5 145.5 145.6 146 147 147.5 148.1 148.9 148.9 149 150.5 153.5 153.5 154.6 155.1 156.4 157 157 157 158.1 160 160.7 163.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
47.7 51.2 52.3 68.9 75.3 76.5 77.8 81 82 83.2 85 85.2 85.9 88.3 90.8 91 92.2 93.5 94 95.3 96.2 96.4 96.5 96.6 96.8 97.1 97.3 97.8 99 99.3 101.1 101.5 103.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.3 22 26.2 26.3 27.5 34.9 35.6 36.1 39 39.1 40 40 40.7 41 41.5 42 42 42.1 43 43.3 43.3 45 45.5 45.7 45.8 45.9 46 46.2 46.4 46.8 47 47 47.1 47.2 47.6 47.7 48 48 48.1 49 49 49.1 49.1 49.3 49.4 49.4 49.6 50 50 50 50.2 50.5 50.7 50.9 51 51.9 52.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 17.5 17.6 18 18.5 20.4 22.2 24 24.1 24.2 24.4 24.9 25.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.7 26.1 26.3 26.4 26.7 27.5 28.1 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 29 29.1 29.4 29.5 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.8 30 30 30.2 30.4 30.5 30.5 30.6 30.8 31.1 31.5 31.5 31.6 31.6 31.7 32 32 32.4 32.4 32.5 33.3 33.3 33.5 33.9 36 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20 20.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
15 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
11
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
51.7
58.4
26.6
59.2
57.7
58
56.7
51.3
57.7
57.2
40.6
57.5
58.6
31.8
57.4
47.6
57
47.7
58.9
59.8
31.9
50.4
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
91.6 98.8 100.5 104.4 105.5 106.4 106.9 107.9 116.5 118 121 126.3 126.9 130.4 132.3 133.9 136 136.1 137.5 138.6 139.3 140 141 141.1 144.5 144.7 145 145.3 145.8 146.9 147.5 148.1 149 149.8 150.4 150.7 152.9 153 153.4 153.7 155.1 155.3 156.3 157.3 157.8 158.4 159.1 160.8 162.2 162.3 162.3 163.3 163.4 163.8 163.9 164.1 164.1 164.4 164.4 164.7 164.9 165.1 165.1 165.6 165.8 166 166.6 166.9 167.5 168 169.4 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.2 94.2 97.1 97.8 99.2 100.6 106.7 117 122.2 124.8 124.9 125.2 125.9 128.7 130.6 132.9 133.2 133.7 133.8 134.3 134.3 134.7 135.9 136.6 137.9 138.8 140.9 141.5 142.1 143.3 143.6 143.7 144 144.2 144.9 146 147.2 147.2 149.8 151.6 152.4 152.6 152.6 152.6 152.9 153.6 153.8 153.8 154.4 154.8 155.6 155.8 156.1 156.2 157 157.4 157.9 158 158.3 158.4 159 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.5 32.7 32.9 33.7 34.2 34.4 36.2 41.4 43.3 49.4 50.1 52.6 52.9 53.9 54.3 54.4 54.6 54.6 54.7 55.3 56.3 56.6 56.8 58 58.3 58.6 58.7 58.7 58.8 59.2 59.5 59.7 60 60.5 61.7 61.9 62.2 63.6 63.7 64.1 64.1 64.1 64.2 64.2 64.5 64.7 64.8 64.8 65 65 65 65.1 65.3 65.3 65.4 65.7 65.8 65.8 65.9 66.1 66.5 66.5 66.6 66.7 66.9 67.7 67.7 68.3 68.4 68.5 68.6 69.4 69.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 12.5 13.3 13.6 13.8 14.3 15.8 18.6 19.5 20.4 20.9 21 21 21.3 22.3 22.4 23.4 23.5 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.7 23.9 24.2 24.5 24.6 24.6 24.9 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.7 25.7 25.7 26 26 26 26 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.2 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.6 26.7 26.8 26.8 26.8 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.2 27.2 27.3 27.3 27.5 27.5 27.6 27.7 27.8 28.1 28.1 28.5 29 29.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.4 19.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
8.8
9.4
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
128
117.6
77.1
132.3
107.2
102.2
99.6
106.6
131.2
114.4
114.2
112.2
116.1
64.9
131.5
101
128.7
109.3
129
115.3
133.5
104.4
129.6
120.9
130.2
132.3
124
79.6
123.7
115.3
115.6
117.5
114.1
114.6
133.2
131.2
129.1
130.7
72.7
127.2
74.2
118
127.5
124.9
131.5
115.8
131
128.3
71.8
70.1
126.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
125.4
113.4
72.9
129.1
106.3
108.1
101
119.7
113.6
107.5
127.2
114.5
121
114.3
117.7
60.9
127.1
103.2
124.7
110.3
124.7
116
130.2
109.4
125.6
127.9
129.3
119.9
81.2
117.2
117.4
114.5
116.2
113.9
110
129
124.2
125.5
128.4
68.2
124
107
69.6
113.6
129.9
123.5
127.4
112.8
128.1
125.3
67.6
66.8
123.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
007 First Light20.919.9
War Thunder1659874.215.8
Death Stranding 225.922.2
Crimson Desert29.918.4
Resident Evil Requiem39.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 7696343
Anno 117: Pax Romana29.320.815.1
ARC Raiders66.438.529.5
The Outer Worlds 231.22519.2
Battlefield 63529.42419.5
Borderlands 418.215.612.5
F1 25574535
Doom: The Dark Ages15.812.811.4
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered412315
Assassin's Creed Shadows212016
Civilization 7783620
Monster Hunter Wilds2217.6
Kingdom Come Deliverance 224201713
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle12.7
Marvel Rivals29242213
Stalker 21513119.65
Call of Duty Black Ops 640362526
Until Dawn30191210.2
EA Sports FC 2572.447.739.739.4
God of War Ragnarök25.425.221.619.1
Final Fantasy XVI15.515.11311.5
Space Marine 218151415.1
Star Wars Outlaws1412.19.097.59
Black Myth: Wukong2521169
Once Human43292221
The First Descendant52332621
F1 2476654912
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2171310
Ghost of Tsushima30252214
Horizon Forbidden West29262017
Alone in the Dark7053431911.3
Dragon's Dogma 2
Last Epoch4336.732.826.916.5
Skull & Bones37332619
Helldivers 22721191813.2
Enshrouded21181512
Palworld4235252317.78.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown16913212675.939.8
Ready or Not5549473020.59.2
The Finals7355503422.19.7
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora20171512
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023615237342815
EA Sports WRC3725222116
Alan Wake 2232120135.98
Lords of the Fallen29231511.783.4
Total War Pharaoh8768484222.110.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage443936282011
EA Sports FC 2410594765651.726.8
Counter-Strike 21198248302711.5
Cyberpunk 20773930242116.37.16
Baldur's Gate 3362823238
Lies of P5346403724.211.9
The Crew Motorfest35332724
Starfield28242017127
Armored Core 650.341.236.730.3
Immortals of Aveum2521.419.2
Atlas Fallen31.529.226.421.7
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart23.9241820.2
F1 237768491273.24
Diablo 450.543.938.638
Star Wars Jedi Survivor23201917
Dead Island 251.845.231.427.3
The Last of Us24.818.615.212.9
Resident Evil 4 Remake25.319.916.9
Company of Heroes 369.548.936.635.7
Sons of the Forest32.821.119.819.4
Atomic Heart49392319
Returnal27252319
Hogwarts Legacy3429221715
Dead Space Remake23.622.518.717.7
The Witcher 3 v44936322721.310.5
High On Life55.433.92920.6
The Callisto Protocol31.52118.111.8
Need for Speed Unbound39.23224.920.3
Spider-Man Miles Morales34.430.626.323.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202249453330
A Plague Tale Requiem19.416.714.512.1
The Quarry37.227.822.315.6
F1 2286765716
Vampire Bloodhunt84.354.246.443.2
Ghostwire Tokyo32.640383924
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands63463226
Cyberpunk 2077 1.63729232215.86.42
GRID Legends101826147
Elden Ring44.840.23525
Dying Light 222.919.618
Rainbow Six Extraction65484533
God of War35292316
Farming Simulator 22133.494.373.860.4
Forza Horizon 597635624
Far Cry 681463933
F1 2021195977431
Watch Dogs Legion72413318
Star Wars Squadrons167.868.55752.233.9
Horizon Zero Dawn47403523
F1 2020190957551
Valorant135.4115.8103.378.643.1
Doom Eternal13568.160.457.242
Red Dead Redemption 272.833.926.216.7
Borderlands 394463024
Control106.135.927.917.48.11
Total War: Three Kingdoms145.360.660.651.2
Far Cry New Dawn71454239
Metro Exodus86362723
Shadow of the Tomb Raider94413631
Strange Brigade1506252453217
Far Cry 5734339372712
X-Plane 11.1154403326
Kingdom Come: Deliverance82.448.829.518.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark7035261911.2
Dota 2 Reborn136107807231.2
The Witcher 31368744282015
GTA V14613959241820.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		34
38
30
12		47
45
20
2		61
39
10
1		62
28
2
1		28
4
2
24
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $599.97
    NIMO 15.6" FHD-Business-Laptop, 8 Cores AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS 16GB RAM 256GB SSD (Up to 4.9GHz, Beat R9 7940HS), Radeon-780M, 100W Fast PD for Creators & Professionals Work/Gaming, 2-Year Warranty
  • $799.97
    NIMO 15.6" IPS FHD-Gaming-Laptop, 8 Cores AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS 32GB DDR5 RAM 1TB SSD (up to 4.9GHz Beat R9 7940HS) Radeon 780M-Graphics, 100W Type-C Backlit Keyboard Fingerprint for Creators
  • $579.99
    FIREBAT Laptop Computer Ultrabook, 16in Quad HD, 4.9GHz AMD Ryzen H 255, Radeon 780M Graphics, DDR5 5600MHz RAM, M.2 PCIe SSD, TF Card Slot, Portable Gaming/School/Business Notebook Computer【U6B】
  • $799.99
    NIMO 15.6" IPS FHD-Gaming-Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS 32GB DDR5 RAM 1TB SSD (8C/16T, up to 4.9GHz) Radeon 780M Graphics Business Computer with 100W Type-C Backlit Keyboard, Fingerprint USB-C 4.0
  • $729.99
    Dell 16-inch Business Laptop – AMD Ryzen 7 250 8-Core | Radeon 780M | 16 Tops AI NPU | 16" FHD+ Touch Display | Backlit Keyboard | Windows 11 Pro | Carbon Black | 16GB DDR5 | 512GB NVMe SSD

v1.35
log 13. 16:02:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Jun 2026 05:28:44 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.013s ... 0.016s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11564 +0.042s ... 0.06s

#10 got single benchmarks 11564 +0.233s ... 0.293s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.293s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +2.363s ... 2.656s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.003s ... 3.659s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 3.66s

#15 Got 3743 rows for game benchmarks. +0.56s ... 4.22s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 4.221s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.087s ... 4.307s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +1.949s ... 6.256s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.494s ... 6.75s

#20 return log +0s ... 6.75s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 780M graphics card

阿利瓦瓦 GH8

Alliwava GH8 评测--配备 Ryzen 9 8945HS 和 USB4 的强大高效迷你 PC

Alliwava GH8 旨在展示当今迷你 PC 的性能。凭借 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、高速 DDR5 内存和 PCIe 固态硬盘，这款小巧的系统配备了通常在大型计算机中才能见到的硬件。但性能是否足以满足日常使用，散热、噪音和效率的实际表现如何？我们将在这篇评测中揭开这些问题的谜底。
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M, 516 g
Dynabook Tecra A65-M 笔记本电脑评测：ThinkPad E 或 EliteBook 的理想替代品

Dynabook Tecra A65-M 笔记本电脑评测：ThinkPad E 或 EliteBook 的理想替代品

Tecra A65-M 并没有什么特别之处，但它的核心基本功能非常扎实，对于大多数不涉及最精确色彩的办公任务来说，它是一款值得信赖的、毫不张扬的笔记本电脑。
AMD Ryzen 7 250, Radeon 780M, 16", 1.7 kg
Geekom A7 Max

Geekom A7 Max 迷你电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen 9 7940HS 的优雅全能型电脑，性能不俗

随着 Geekom A7 Max 的推出，这家制造商将一款配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 Radeon 780M 的功能强大的迷你 PC 送进了比赛。DDR5 内存、快速 PCIe 固态硬盘和众多连接听起来很有前途。但是，这款小巧的系统能否长期提供这样的性能呢？在日常使用中，它在散热、噪音和效率方面的表现又如何呢？
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 681 g
小型论坛 AI X1

经济实惠的板载音响迷你 PC：Minisforum AI X1 为创意人士、办公用户和游戏玩家提供 AMD Ryzen 动力评测

Minisforum AI X1 是一款体积小巧、性能出众的微型电脑。它配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 255、现代 iGPU 和高效散热装置，主要面向那些正在寻找一款可用于工作、多媒体和轻度游戏的多功能电脑的用户。在我们的评测中，我们将检查它在性能、噪音和能效方面的表现。
AMD Ryzen 7 255, Radeon 780M, 658 g
配备 AMD Ryzen 7 的 Geekom A8 新 2025 版：适用于办公、多媒体和家庭办公的强大高效迷你 PC 评测

配备 AMD Ryzen 7 的 Geekom A8 新 2025 版：适用于办公、多媒体和家庭办公的强大高效迷你 PC 评测

Geekom A8 将 AMD 的 Ryzen 7 8745HS、Radeon 780M 显卡、DDR5 内存和 PCIe 固态硬盘集成在一个紧凑而现代的机箱中。它的价格也比顶级机型更实惠，但性能稍逊的配置能否在激烈的竞争中立于不败之地？这款迷你电脑的日常使用效率如何？我们对 Geekom A8 进行了广泛的测试，以评估其性能、效率和综合能力。
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, Radeon 780M, 425 g

Alliwava H90 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, 0.5 kg
  Review » 性能与效率的完美结合：采用 AMD Ryzen 7 APU 的 Alliwava H90 Pro 迷你电脑评测

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 这款价格更实惠的 AMD Ryzen 7 版本仍然是一款赢家：惠普EliteBook 8 G1a 14笔记本电脑评测

GMK NucBox K12: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, 0.9 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K12 迷你电脑评测：更大，但不一定更快

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21T0003NGE: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 对于这款商务笔记本电脑来说，AMD 是比英特尔更糟糕的选择：联想 ThinkPad E14 7 代评测

Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 1 kg
  Review » 功能强大的迷你电脑物美价廉？Peladn HA-4 向 Geekom、Minisforum 等挑战--Ryzen 7 7840HS 评测带来的效率奇迹

Beelink SER9 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 迷你电脑评测：普通非 Pro 版速度更快

Ninkear M8, 32+1TB: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, 0.5 kg
  Review » 比 Geekom 和 Minisforum 更好？搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 的 Ninkear M8 mini PC 在评测中表现如何？

Chuwi Aubox, R7 8745HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » 450 美元以下的最佳迷你 PC？配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS 的 Chuwi AuBox 评测

BOSGAME M4 Neo: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Bosgame M4 Neo 测试 - 昂贵迷你 PC 的经济型替代品

Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » 最超值的 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS？- Geekom A8 Max 迷你电脑评测

Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.40", 2.6 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook 18 笔记本电脑评测：不到 1,000 美元的显示屏怪物

Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 和超静音散热技术的强大迷你 PC

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 14 评测--经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑，搭载 Zen 4，动力强劲

GMK NucBox K11: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K11 迷你电脑评测：搭载 AMD Zen 4，每美元性能强劲

Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » ZOTAC Gaming Zone 手持设备评测：Precision 控制器、亮丽的 OLED 显示屏和小巧的机身

BOSGAME M2: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » BOSGAME M2 迷你电脑评测：修正了原版 M1 的一大缺陷

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21ME000TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » OLED 吞噬电池寿命联想 ThinkPad P14s 第 5 代 AMD 笔记本电脑评测

HP EliteBook 845 G11: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 EliteBook 845 G11 笔记本电脑评测--无重大变化，但仍是最佳商务笔记本之一

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD 比英特尔快得多联想 ThinkPad T14 第 5 代笔记本电脑评测

Ayaneo Flip KB: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » Ayaneo Flip KB 评测--采用效率较低的 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U 的功能强大的掌上游戏机

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga 7 二合一 14AHP9 评测：快速的中端敞篷跑车，弱显示屏拖了后腿

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » IdeaPad 5 二合一 14AHP9 可折叠电脑评测：联想最便宜也是最快的产品之一

Ninkear A16 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » Zotac Zone 评测：丰富的显示屏与同级领先的输入

Minisforum MS-A1: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, 1.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum MS-A1 评测：工作站支持各种 AMD CPU 并提供四个固态硬盘空间

Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24): AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手

Geekom AX8 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.5 kg
  Review » Geekom AX8 Pro AI NUC PC 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD，0.47L 机箱

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：性能平平的紧凑型 Ryzen 机器

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池，成为最佳游戏掌上电脑

Geekom AE7: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Geekom AE7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、DDR5 内存、现代接口和一个问题的 NUC 迷你 PC

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24): AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER8 PC 评论：Mac Mini-inspired 设计与 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7445 二合一可转换机型评测：从 Ryzen-U 过渡到 Ryzen-HS

Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Aoostar GEM12 迷你电脑评测：AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS，32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 OCuLink 接口

GPD Win Mini 2024 7": AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » GPD Win Mini Zen 4 手持设备评测：华硕 ROG Ally 的可靠替代品

Geekom A8, R9 8945HS: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.4 kg
  Review » Geekom A8 评测：高级 0.5 升迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen 7040 的大型 ThinkPad 更加出色

BOSGAME M1: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » BOSGAME M1 迷你 PC 评测：Ryzen 7 7840HS 仍是一头猛兽

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Envy x360 2 合 1 16 评论：Ryzen 7 8840HS 击败酷睿 7 155U

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测 - AMD 版 Zenbook 配备了较弱的 1080p OLED 屏幕

Minisforum V3: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Minisforum V3 三合一平板电脑评测：首款采用 AMD Hawk Point APU（又称 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U）的 Windows 平板电脑

Acemagic AM18: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Acemagic AM18 评测：采用抢眼赛博朋克外观的游戏迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 和 32 GB 内存

GMK NucBox K6: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.5 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K6 迷你电脑评测：与最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 笔记本电脑一样强大

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 120-Hz OLED 的强大超便携产品

Minisforum Mercury Series EM780: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 0.2 kg
  Review » Minisforum Mercury 系列 EM780 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的超小型迷你 PC

Geekom A7: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.4 kg
  Review » 带 0.5 升机箱的 Geekom A7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD 的高级迷你 PC

HP EliteBook 865 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 865 G10笔记本电脑评测--被Sure View毁掉的高性能商务笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
  Review » 测试中的 AMD Ryzen 8000 Hawk Point - Zen4 更新版在数字运算和 GPU 性能方面优于 Meteor Lake

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 8.40", 0.9 kg
  Review » OneXPlayer 2 Pro 游戏手持设备、平板电脑或可拆卸设备评测：配备强大 Ryzen 7 的多面设备

Ayaneo Kun: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 8.40", 0.9 kg
  Review » Ayaneo Kun 游戏掌上电脑评测：个人主义者的性能野兽

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad P16s G2 AMD 评测：这款工作站笔记本电脑内含强劲动力和 OLED 显示屏

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评测--配备 AMD Zen4 和 120Hz 显示屏的 Linux 超极本

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 AMD 评测：快速、便携、直观

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 笔记本电脑评测：联想对戴尔 XPS 13 的回应

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Go 游戏掌上电脑评测：创意不错，但执行不够完美

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 笔记本电脑评测--AMD Zen4 并非自动更好

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad T14 G4 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：小巧的 ThinkPad 中的 Ryzen 功能

Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 和 Radeon 780M 的迷你 PC 已获得 OCuLink 和 USB-4 连接

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Ryzen 7 笔记本电脑评测：所有正确位置的变化

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkPad T14s G4评测：采用 AMD Zen4 的商务笔记本电脑更出色

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G8 AMD 评测--定制 Zen4 CPU 与出色的 2.9K OLED 相得益彰

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power : AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 5.50", 0.4 kg
  Review » 测试中的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 游戏掌上电脑 - 口袋里的 Zen4 Power

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift Edge 16 Ryzen 7 7840U 笔记本电脑评测：Zen 4 CPU 和 3.2K 120 Hz OLED 提升

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 框架笔记本 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U 评测：比英特尔版本好太多

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：凭借 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 和无与伦比的价格，商务笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象

Beelink SER7: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Beelink SER7 迷你 PC 评测：配备蒸汽室冷却系统的 Ryzen 7 7840HS

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：配备 AMD Zen4 的近乎完美的商务笔记本电脑

  Review » 使用新驱动程序测试 AMD Radeon 780M 和 760M iGPU 的性能

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus 系列 UM790 Pro 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 Radeon 780M 使其优于竞争对手

Beelink GTR7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS性能首次亮相：Beelink GTR7迷你电脑评测

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 14.00"
  Review » AMD Radeon 780M iGPU分析--AMD新的RDNA-3 GPU对其竞争对手的挑战

  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS分析--Zen4 Phoenix的理想效率是Apple

HP ProBook 4 G1a 14: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 4 G1a 14

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 15.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15AHP10

Acer TravelMate P4 TMP414-42: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P4 TMP414-42

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14

HP Omnibook 5 16-bc1000: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omnibook 5 16-bc1000

HP EliteBook 865 G11: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 1.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G11

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 16AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 16AHP9

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED M5506UA: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED M5506UA

Acer Nitro Blaze 11: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 10.95", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro Blaze 11

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS

Acer Nitro Blaze 7: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro Blaze 7

HP EliteBook 845 G11: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 845 G11

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5

Acer Aspire 15 A15-41M: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 15 A15-41M

Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024

Acer Swift Edge SFE16-44: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16-44

HP Envy x360 14-fa0000: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 14-fa0000

HP Pavilion Aero 13-bg0000: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Aero 13-bg0000

Lenovo Yoga 7 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14AHP9

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally X

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10, R7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10, R7 7840HS

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA

HP EliteBook 865 G10, R7 PRO 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G10, R7 PRO 7840U

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE

HP EliteBook 865 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G10

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16APH8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16APH8

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (L23): AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (L23)

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH8

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16APH8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16APH8

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Go

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023

Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43

Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 6

Acemagic AM18: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
   » Acemagic 2026 周年庆：迷你 PC、笔记本电脑和 NAS 系统大折扣活动

Alliwava GH8, R9 8945HS: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.5 kg
   » Alliwava GH8 迷你 PC 评测：搭载 AMD Ryzen 9 处理器的顶级机型袭来 Minisforum, Geekom & Co

Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.7 kg
   » 配备 AMD Ryzen 9 的迷你 PC：Geekom A7 Max Edition 2026 值得购买吗？

Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » Dynabook Tecra A65-M 显示双通道内存对集成显卡性能的重要性

   » 这一缺点让新款 Dynabook Tecra A65-M 彻底黯然失色。

Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255: AMD Ryzen 7 255, 0.7 kg
   » Minisforum AI X1 便宜起步：配备 AMD Ryzen 7 255 和内置扬声器的迷你 PC 评测

Geekom A8, R7 8745HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, 0.4 kg
   » 配备 Ryzen 7 8745HS 的 Geekom A8：这款迷你 PC 值得购买吗？

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 旧标准的回归：惠普让 RJ45 以太网端口重返多种商业模式

GMK NucBox K12: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, 0.9 kg
   » GMK NucBox K12 的设计有一个微小但令人讨厌的缺陷

   » 新款 Ryzen 7 H 255 的性能几乎与 3 年前的 Ryzen 7 7840HS 完全相同

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21T0003NGE: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 终于采用了 AMD Zen 4 处理器，但仍落后一个时代：联想的 ThinkPad E14 第 7 代 AMD 比以往任何时候都更好

Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 1 kg
   » 测试中的时尚 Ryzen 7 mini PC - Peladn HA-4 以最高效率和 RGB 灯光获得好评

Beelink SER9 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, 0.8 kg
   » 在首次基准测试中，Ryzen 7 H 255 是 Ryzen 7 8845HS 的翻版

Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.7 kg
   » Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 APU 的完美迷你 PC？

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » Framework 12 作为可维修的 "入门级 "二合一笔记本电脑发布，采用坚固耐用的设计

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21ME000TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 成熟的 Strix 光环：下一版 ThinkPad P14s AMD 需要 Ryzen AI Max

   » 不平等待遇：联想如何让 AMD 版 ThinkPad P14s 5 代变得更糟

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
   » 联想Legion Go 2 控制器将向后兼容Legion Go，"不久 "即可购买

HP EliteBook 845 G11: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 惠普EliteBook 845是最好的商务笔记本之一，但散热性能仍是弱点

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 2025 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 笔记本现配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H 和 Ryzen AI 300 APU

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » 微星 Claw 8 AI+ 与罗杰 Ally X：据报道，Lunar Lake APU 让微星在性能和电池续航时间方面缩小差距

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
   » 微星 Claw 8 AI+ 与罗杰 Ally X：据报道，Lunar Lake APU 让微星在性能和电池续航时间方面缩小差距

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
   » 微星 Claw 8 AI+ 与罗杰 Ally X：据报道，Lunar Lake APU 让微星在性能和电池续航时间方面缩小差距

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power : AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 5.50", 0.4 kg
   » Ayaneo Flip KB 手持控制台：功能卓越，性能中等

Ayaneo Flip KB: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » Ayaneo Flip KB 手持控制台：功能卓越，性能中等

Ayaneo Kun: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 8.40", 0.9 kg
   » Ayaneo Flip KB 手持控制台：功能卓越，性能中等

GPD Win Mini 2024 7": AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.5 kg
   » GPD 公布 Pocket 4 售价：搭载 AMD 处理器的超便携笔记本电脑即将上市

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » 借助华硕 ROG Ally 显示屏和 Gamescope 中的 VRR 支持，SteamOS 向第三方手持设备靠拢

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » Framework 笔记本电脑砖系统可利用乐高脚垫、轮子、电缆支架等扩展笔记本电脑

Minisforum Mercury Series EM780: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 0.2 kg
   » Minisforum Mercury 系列 EM780 在 1/4 L 机箱中内置 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 和 32 GB DDR5 内存

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 快速、明亮、实用：配备 Ryzen 7 和 Radeon 780M 的联想 ThinkPad P16s G2 AMD 评测

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
   » 华硕ROG盟友：高管证实玩家可以暂缓最近麻烦的BIOS更新

   » 华硕ROG Ally：开启预购，更便宜的AMD Ryzen Z1型号将随后推出

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8065S
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
M4 9-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Adreno 840 *
M4 8-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *
Vega 3
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter