Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M 是适用于笔记本电脑的 Ryzen 7040 系列中的集成 GPU（Phoenix，例如 Ryzen 9 7940HS）。 iGPU 基于新的 RDNA3 架构，具有 12 个 CU（= 768 个着色器），主频高达 3 GHz（取决于 CPU 型号）。与前身 Radeon 680M 一样，780M 支持硬件光线追踪，但性能太慢，无法在当前游戏中使用。

得益于新的架构和更高的时钟速度，Radeon 780M 应该明显比旧的 Radeon 680M 更快。这意味着要求最高的游戏应该可以在最低图形设置下运行（例如《赛博朋克 2077》），而要求较低的游戏（例如《FIFA 23》）可以在更高的设置和分辨率 (1080p) 下运行。 2023 年初，Radeon 780M 成为市场上最快的 iGPU。

得益于现代 4 纳米工艺和巧妙的节能功能，功耗相对较低（根据 AMD 的说法）。前两种型号的整个芯片可配置在 15 - 54 瓦 TDP 之间。

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines768 - unified
TMUs48
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed1500 - 3000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 780MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G8 x 4200 MHz, 65 W2900 MHz? MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 2708 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H8 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
» show 20 more
min. - max.? - 2900 MHz2700 - 2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2.74 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2.74 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
2.79 -7%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2.84 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
2.89 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2.91 -3%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2.96 -1%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2.97 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
2.99
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.11 4%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.17 6%
Intel Arc A310
3.17 6%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.19 7%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.27 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.35 12%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.38 13%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
3.45 15%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3.46 16%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19 535%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1014%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1707     avg: 3016     median: 3164.5 (8%)     max: 3541 Points
+ 68 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1496     avg: 2703     median: 2831 (6%)     max: 3196 Points
+ 68 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -19%
AMD Radeon 680M
2227 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -17%
AMD Radeon 760M
2255 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -15%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
2402 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
2472 -9%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
2601 -4%
AMD Radeon 860M
2626 -3%
AMD Radeon 780M
2703
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 8%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2934 9%
Intel Arc A350M
2993 11%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 11%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 619%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 1614%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 311361     avg: 414791     median: 426490 (43%)     max: 451929 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 124671     avg: 179121     median: 176515 (21%)     max: 226039 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25056     avg: 34324     median: 35532 (34%)     max: 39559 Points
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 27771     avg: 46177     median: 48112 (12%)     max: 53972 Points
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4187     avg: 7134     median: 7393 (11%)     max: 8172 Points
+ 68 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4550     avg: 7719     median: 7997 (7%)     max: 8904 Points
+ 68 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 183073     avg: 245639     median: 233585 (26%)     max: 317851 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
4696 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2548     avg: 4869     median: 4945 (6%)     max: 5972 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 18040     avg: 27818     median: 28765 (27%)     max: 29856 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 18439     avg: 33173     median: 34409 (13%)     max: 37947 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7732     avg: 12163     median: 12486 (15%)     max: 14017 Points
+ 65 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7868     avg: 12427     median: 12818.5 (10%)     max: 14274 Points
+ 66 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305 -9%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
11414 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -8%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11751 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -4%
Intel Arc A310
11915 -4%
Intel Arc A370M
12066 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
12289 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
12427
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
12479 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
12583 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
12797 3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12801 3%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
12978 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13515 9%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
13524 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13581 9%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 382%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 944%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 26795     avg: 40475     median: 41650 (12%)     max: 44741 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 21873     avg: 35002     median: 35901 (20%)     max: 38818 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
32473 -7%
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
32473 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
33179 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33321 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
33740 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
33810 -3%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
33936 -3%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
34680 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
34951 0%
AMD Radeon 780M
35002
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
35209 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
35807 2%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36137 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
36214 3%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
36405 4%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 5%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
37644 8%
AMD Radeon 890M
38139 9%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
151016 331%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
173912 397%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 41483     avg: 54486     median: 54511.5 (60%)     max: 64978 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
44877 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46269 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
46696 -14%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47870 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48758 -11%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
50971 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
51505 -5%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
52117 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54320 0%
AMD Radeon 780M
54486
Intel Arc A770M
55811 2%
AMD Radeon 890M
59420 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61850 14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62666 15%
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
69623 28%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
87172 60%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
45913 Points (60%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 30331     avg: 41557     median: 42328 (55%)     max: 45612 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 12.8     avg: 22     median: 23.1 (7%)     max: 25.4 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 93     avg: 110     median: 113 (28%)     max: 128 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 58.9     avg: 73.1     median: 74.9 (11%)     max: 83.3 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 25.2     avg: 28.9     median: 30 (5%)     max: 32 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 29.45     avg: 53.5     median: 56.9 (15%)     max: 65 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 60.8     avg: 69.2     median: 69.7 (19%)     max: 78.3 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 18.1     avg: 21.7     median: 19.7 (18%)     max: 40.9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 44.3     avg: 52.9     median: 54.2 (22%)     max: 58 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 65.5     avg: 83.4     median: 86.6 (14%)     max: 99.5 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 75.6     avg: 83     median: 84.7 (13%)     max: 88.5 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 89.7     avg: 101.2     median: 100 (27%)     max: 118 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 99.64     avg: 129.1     median: 134 (15%)     max: 150 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.2     avg: 27.9     median: 28.4 (5%)     max: 31.8 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 53.2     avg: 68.8     median: 69.9 (12%)     max: 79.8 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 83.66     avg: 102.9     median: 106 (12%)     max: 116 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 18.4     avg: 22.1     median: 22.4 (7%)     max: 25.8 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 70.44     avg: 87.7     median: 89.2 (13%)     max: 95.8 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 83.02     avg: 117.7     median: 125 (14%)     max: 135 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 68.89     avg: 81.5     median: 82.8 (13%)     max: 88.9 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 47.09     avg: 62.3     median: 67.2 (13%)     max: 67.9 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 80.9     avg: 129.1     median: 134 (16%)     max: 149 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 21.6     avg: 36     median: 34.9 (10%)     max: 51.5 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 69.8     avg: 117.1     median: 122.7 (13%)     max: 134 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 16.5     avg: 22.2     median: 22.7 (4%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 38     avg: 55.2     median: 56.7 (19%)     max: 62 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 24.2     avg: 34.2     median: 36.1 (18%)     max: 38.9 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 18.5     avg: 34     median: 36.6 (10%)     max: 39.9 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 17.4     avg: 24.4     median: 25.3 (6%)     max: 27.2 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 35.6     avg: 59.9     median: 61.5 (6%)     max: 67 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 6.86     avg: 11.6     median: 12.4 (8%)     max: 17.4 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 28.2     avg: 45.7     median: 47.3 (7%)     max: 51.2 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 11.2     avg: 17.8     median: 15.4 (2%)     max: 31 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 20.2     avg: 31     median: 31.3 (14%)     max: 35.6 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 15.8     avg: 23.2     median: 24.3 (16%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 10.8     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (7%)     max: 21.4 fps
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11162     avg: 15944     median: 16402 (12%)     max: 17730 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
0 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 117.1     avg: 187.3     median: 191.6 (11%)     max: 253 fps
+ 64 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 99.6 %
+ 64 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 26.9     avg: 39.5     median: 27.1 (10%)     max: 88.9 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 58.3     avg: 59.8     median: 60.3 (11%)     max: 60.8 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -20%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6 -19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -17%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -16%
AMD Radeon 860M
51.3 -14%
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 -14%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -12%
AMD Radeon 840M
56 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
57.6 -4%
AMD Radeon 780M
59.8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
61.4 3%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
62.4 4%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
62.7 5%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 5%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 7%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 8%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 8%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
65.5 10%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 786%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 112.3     avg: 140.4     median: 146.7 (11%)     max: 152.8 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 159.6     avg: 162.3     median: 161.7 (15%)     max: 166.1 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 190.7     avg: 214.1     median: 220.5 (5%)     max: 224.8 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 288     avg: 298.8     median: 299.3 (12%)     max: 308.8 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 552.4     avg: 566     median: 568.9 (5%)     max: 574.9 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 49.9     avg: 166.6     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 446 fps
+ 62 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 8.4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 38.8 fps
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 15316     avg: 28708     median: 29512 (8%)     max: 33077 points
+ 64 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 29068     median: 29825 (7%)     max: 35544 points
+ 62 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 575     avg: 889     median: 931 (3%)     max: 1173 Samples/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 991     avg: 1681     median: 1546 (3%)     max: 2312 Samples/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 7230     avg: 9356     median: 9692.5 (8%)     max: 10495 points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.4     avg: 63.1     median: 61.9 (8%)     max: 106 Watt
+ 58 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 58.2     median: 57.8 (8%)     max: 84 Watt
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 33.3     avg: 57.6     median: 54.5 (12%)     max: 83.5 Watt
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.2407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (43%)     max: 0.754 fps per Watt
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.301     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (41%)     max: 0.797 fps per Watt
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 37.6     avg: 58.1     median: 59.5 (17%)     max: 81.3 Watt
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.8     avg: 68.9     median: 69.9 (9%)     max: 104.4 Watt
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.1912     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.506 fps per Watt
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 32.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (63%)     max: 47 dB(A)
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
40.4 41.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Civilization 7

Civilization 7

2025
low 1920x1080
66.7 78.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.6 43.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9 22.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

2025
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation 1920x1080
36.3
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
18 29.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4 24.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.4 20.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
42.7
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

2024
low 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
12.3 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.3 14.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.3 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.2
Call of Duty Black Ops 6

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

2024
low 1920x1080
31 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 43 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 30 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
82
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
27.4 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.8 12.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.1
EA Sports FC 25

EA Sports FC 25

2024
low 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Settings 1280x720
116.6
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
34.6
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
26
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
14 21.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.5 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
31.7
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
7.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
20.1
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
21 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
49
low FSR 68 1280x720
59
Once Human

Once Human

2024
low 1920x1080
39.3 39.3 49.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.2 26.6 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.7 21.6 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 19.1 25.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
96.1
77.3
71.8
The First Descendant

The First Descendant

2024
low 1920x1080
44.3 59.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9 37.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.8 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.9 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
98.1
71.9
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
43.3 45.5 53.6 69 73 75.9 76.8 78.7 81.3 82 82.8 83.4 83.4 85.9 87.2 89.4 90.9 90.9 91.5 92.1 94.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.4 37.1 40.2 49.1 61.1 63.8 64.4 65 67.8 69.4 70.7 70.9 71.9 72.1 72.8 75.5 77 78.2 78.3 79 80.1 80.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3 27.1 31.3 43.8 46 46.3 47.3 48.8 50.3 51.3 51.4 51.7 52.3 53.7 54.4 55.1 57 57.7 57.7 58.8 59.5 59.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4 9.5 10.1 10.3 11.1 11.7 12 12.6 13.4 13.9 14.4 14.5 14.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.3 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.2 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
10.6 26.9 32.5 32.5 33.3 34.9 36.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5 21.4 24.6 25.6 26.5 28.3 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 18.8 21.4 21.8 23 25.3 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 11.8 14.9 16.3 16.7 19.7 20.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
27.7 28.5 29.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.6 25.2 26 27.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5 17.7 18.7 24.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
42.6
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
65.5 75 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.3 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
94.8
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
0 (!)
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
38.4 46.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
95
90.4
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
34 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
57
52
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
23 30.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
48.8
37.6
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
16.8 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6 20.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10 14.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
45.9
29.1
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
37.9 46.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.3 39.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
87.5
72.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
141.1 158.4 173.5 175.6 175.8 178.2 179.9 ~ 169 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.2 127.7 134.9 134.9 137.7 139.4 143 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 120.2 127.1 128.9 130.5 133 135.5 ~ 126 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
52.7 57.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.8 53.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.4 51.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 34.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
70.2 76.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.7 58.5 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.8 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.6 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
125.6
119.9
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
15 19 25 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 17 22 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 14 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
37
23
30
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
52 56 68 68 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 50 57 61 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29 36 38 45 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 31 37 41 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
122
101
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
30.6 42.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 25.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
99.3
76.9
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
22.4 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.6 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.7
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
24 33.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.4 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.3 9.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
58.3
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
81.9 87.1 87.9 89.5 89.6 89.9 90.8 92.2 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.8 65.1 65.6 68 68.6 71.6 75.5 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2 38.6 40.4 43.8 54.1 58.1 61 61.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 30.3 32 34.7 46.9 53.9 55.2 55.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
154.3
159.8
142
162.8
147.8
165.3
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
62
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
101.2 107.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.6 98.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73 78.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 71.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
169.1
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
102.4 134.8 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.4 96.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7 61.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 38.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
167.8
126.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
23.9 25.7 29.3 30 32.5 32.6 32.7 33.1 33.8 33.9 34.3 35.5 36.1 37.3 37.8 38 38.3 38.5 38.5 38.7 39.1 39.2 39.2 40.4 40.5 40.5 41 41.3 41.4 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.9 42 42.4 42.4 42.9 43.4 43.8 43.9 44 44.1 44.5 44.6 44.7 45 45.4 45.4 46.3 46.3 47.9 52.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph