Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900H

Intel i9-13900H

英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 是基于 Raptor Lake-H 系列（Alder Lake 架构）的笔记本电脑高端移动 CPU。它于 2023 年初发布，提供 6 个高性能核心（P 核心，Golden Cove 架构）和 8 个高效核心（E 核心，Gracemont 架构）。P 核心支持超线程技术，与 E 核心结合可支持 20 个线程。性能集群的时钟频率范围为 2.6 至 5.4 GHz（单核涡轮增压，全核 4.9 GHz），效率集群的时钟频率范围为 1.9 至 4.1 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧版 Skylake 核心类似（与酷睿 i7-6920HQ 作比较 酷睿 i7-6920HQ).所有内核均可使用多达 24 MB 三级缓存。与类似的酷睿 i9-13900HK 相比，13900H 不支持用于超频的开放式倍增器，但另一方面支持全套 vPro 管理功能。

性能

我们数据库中 13900H 的平均性能与 酷睿 i5-13500HX, 酷睿 i7-13705H, 酷睿 i9-12900HK, 酷睿 i9-13905H以及 Ryzen 9 7940HS就多线程基准测试成绩而言，Ryzen 9 7940HS、Core i9-12900HK、Core i9-13905H 和 Ryzen 9 7940HS 都要逊色一些。

得益于体面的散热解决方案和 115 W 的 CPU 长期功率限制，Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014是我们所知的最快的 13900H 笔记本电脑之一。截至 2023 年 8 月，与我们数据库中采用相同芯片的最慢系统相比，它在 CPU 负载工作负载中的速度可提高约 50%。

功能特点

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型，最高可达 DDR5-5200（第 12 代产品为 4800 MHz）。线程指令（硬件）可支持操作系统决定在性能核心或高效核心上使用哪个线程，以获得最佳性能。针对人工智能任务，CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost（通过 AVX2）。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同，支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 现在支持用于 GPU 的 PCIe 5.0 x8 和用于 SSD 的两个 PCIe 4.0 x4。

集成显卡基于 Xe 架构，提供 96 个 EU（执行单元）。

CPU 的基本额定功率为 45 瓦（PL2 为 115 瓦），但大多数笔记本电脑的 PL1 功率约为 60 瓦。SoC 采用英特尔 10 纳米工艺制造，被称为英特尔 7（比第 12 代改进）。

SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameRaptor Lake-H

Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H

Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1900 - 5400 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.2 MB
Level 2 Cache11.5 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads14 / 20
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/04/2023
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
41.8 pt (69%)
AMD E1-2100
2.38 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
41 -2%
Intel Core i7-13705H
41.1 -2%
Intel Core i7-13650HX
41.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
41.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
41.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
41.7 0%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
41.7 0%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
41.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41.8 0%
Intel Core i9-13900H
41.8
Intel Core i7-13800H
42.3 1%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42.8 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
43.4 4%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
44.1 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
45 8%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
45.1 8%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45.8 10%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46 10%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46.9 12%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
48.3 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
61 46%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 102.5     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 104 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 703     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (14%)     max: 818 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13015     avg: 16992     median: 17706 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1297     avg: 1894     median: 1966 (84%)     max: 2054 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 723     median: 754 (84%)     max: 792 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4960     avg: 6599     median: 6864.5 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2061     avg: 2685     median: 2706 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
01553104656207759301085124013951550170518602015217023252480263527902945Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 211     avg: 269.8     median: 280 (84%)     max: 297 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.48     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 29.65 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.98     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9550     avg: 9590     median: 9590 (58%)     max: 9630 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53438     avg: 54921     median: 54920.5 (40%)     max: 56403 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 79014     avg: 79435     median: 79435 (55%)     max: 79856 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13752     avg: 13786     median: 13786 (17%)     max: 13820 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.496     avg: 296.1     median: 296.1 (4%)     max: 412.775 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.141     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 3.518 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6800     avg: 8052     median: 8051.5 (13%)     max: 9303 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 45045     avg: 66867     median: 70217.5 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3665     avg: 6064     median: 6277.5 (75%)     max: 6600 MIPS
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.95     avg: 126.3     median: 126.3 (44%)     max: 138.55 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 284     avg: 292.3     median: 292.3 (67%)     max: 300.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 18.7     median: 19 (33%)     max: 22.3 fps
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (42%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 14 (36%)     max: 14.8 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 279     avg: 348.7     median: 336 (4%)     max: 467 Seconds
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 166     avg: 203     median: 193 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869     avg: 14799     median: 14893 (32%)     max: 15501 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.156     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.445 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.784     avg: 15     median: 15 (1%)     max: 16.234 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 350.453     avg: 383.8     median: 383.8 (2%)     max: 417.103 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574     avg: 65893     median: 67507 (59%)     max: 75108 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15540     avg: 21972     median: 22680.5 (61%)     max: 25420 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 83732     avg: 95381     median: 93901 (76%)     max: 103874 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 85594     avg: 91514     median: 93285 (76%)     max: 93890 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89952     avg: 94996     median: 96373 (81%)     max: 98040 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12004     avg: 17896     median: 18588.5 (47%)     max: 22184 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17733     avg: 26770     median: 27939 (50%)     max: 32664 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7863     avg: 11616     median: 11827.5 (50%)     max: 13726 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2437     avg: 2658     median: 2653.5 (71%)     max: 2807 points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11118     avg: 12850     median: 12644 (50%)     max: 14404 points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1140     avg: 1903     median: 1960 (83%)     max: 2043 points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9094     avg: 12693     median: 13014 (23%)     max: 15410 points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 1819     median: 1847 (8%)     max: 1958 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11168     avg: 12512     median: 12681 (40%)     max: 14172 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7253     avg: 8025     median: 8266 (83%)     max: 8498 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41851     avg: 47697     median: 46327 (51%)     max: 54848 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 456     avg: 505     median: 478 (1%)     max: 828 ms
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (88%)     max: 102947 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.5     avg: 275.6     median: 284 (82%)     max: 348 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 171.4     avg: 303.2     median: 317 (66%)     max: 340 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1104     avg: 1872     median: 1915 (73%)     max: 2146 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.1     avg: 100.5     median: 102.4 (18%)     max: 154 Watt
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.1     avg: 125.6     median: 115.9 (21%)     max: 196.9 Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.9     avg: 14     median: 15.6 (10%)     max: 28.1 Watt
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 27.9     median: 21.8 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 25. 08:39:43

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:28:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.02s ... 0.021s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.024s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.024s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.023s ... 0.046s

#16 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.09s ... 0.137s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +1.189s ... 1.326s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.001s ... 1.326s

#20 return log +0s ... 1.326s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-13900H processor

Geekom GT13 Pro

Geekom GT13 Pro 迷你 PC 评测 - 配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H、32 GB DDR4 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘的时尚 NUC 替代品

Geekom 的 GT13 Pro 继承了现有型号系列的时尚设计。英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 带来了很多惊喜，但在这篇详细的评测中，我们将近距离观察这颗高端 SoC 在 0.5 升的小机箱中表现如何。这款迷你电脑配备了 32 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘，装备精良，两个 USB4 端口的连接也体现了这一点。...
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | | 440 g
迷你论坛 MS-01

工作站评测：Minisforum MS-01 首次亮相，配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H，但缺少专用显卡前置工作站

根据制造商的说法，Minisforum MS-01 是一款适用于高性能工作负载的工作站。它配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器和快速 DDR5 内存，可容纳多个固态硬盘--这一切听起来都很有前景。MS-01 还有一个用于安装扩展卡的 PCIe x16 物理接口。在这篇评测中，我们将探讨 Minisforum 是...
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | | 1.5 kg
华硕 VivoBook S15 OLES BAPE 版评测

华硕 VivoBook S15 BAPE 笔记本电脑评测：性能超强的 OLED 笔记本电脑？还是特别版会铩羽而归？

华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED BAPE 版脱颖而出--不仅因为它的设计，还因为它的包装盒。请进入我们的 "A Bathing Ape "笔记本电脑评测，了解这款多媒体设备、其 OLED 显示屏和英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 是否能在日常使用中给人留下深刻印象。...
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | 15.60" | 1.6 kg
华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑

华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑

华为为其 2024 型多媒体笔记本电脑 MateBook D 16 配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器。然而，它却受到了功耗限制的制约。特别是在端口方面进行了严格的削减，但相比之下，电池续航时间却得到了改善。 ...
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | 16.00" | 1.7 kg
Geekom Mini IT13 迷你电脑评测 - 配备超强酷睿 i9 处理器的迷你台式机

Geekom Mini IT13 迷你电脑评测 - 配备超强酷睿 i9 处理器的迷你台式机

Geekom Mini IT13 是 Geekom 最新推出的 SFF 台式机。它搭载了强大的第 13 代英特尔酷睿处理器，最高可达英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H。虽然这款台式机性能强劲，但高端 CPU 需要风扇持续高速旋转（而且声音很大）。 ...
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | | 652 g

MSI Stealth 16 Mercedes-AMG Motorsport A13VG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 微星 Stealth 16 Mercedes-AMG Motorsport 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的移动赛车

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 (2023) 笔记本电脑评测：酷睿 i9-13900H、RTX 4050 和 3.2K OLED 是业余创作者的好兆头

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) 评测：专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad P1 G6 笔记本电脑评测--取代 ThinkPad X1 Extreme 的移动工作站

Dell Precision 5480: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada 性能首次亮相：戴尔Precision 5480 工作站评测

Dell Precision 5000 5680: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 戴尔Precision 5680 评测：阿达-拉芙蕾丝在工作站中独占鳌头

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Slim 7i 16 8代笔记本电脑评论：比Razer Blade 16更薄

Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 华硕ZenBook 14X（2023）笔记本电脑评测：OLED超极本的极限

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 纤薄的华硕ROG Flow X16笔记本电脑评测：强大的16英寸游戏工作站二合一，带触摸屏

Huawei MateBook 16s i9: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 华为MateBook 16s 2023评测 - 多媒体笔记本电脑现在有了更明亮的3:2显示屏

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾：配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕ZenBook Pro 14 Duo笔记本电脑评测，为创意者提供第二块显示屏：提高生产力

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 with RTX 4070 in review：商务型笔记本中的高图形性能

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.6 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Flow Z13的回顾：疯狂--RTX4060在一个令人印象深刻的游戏平板中的应用

MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3 kg
  Review » MSI Stealth 17 Studio回顾：一个拥有安静的RTX4080的笔记本电脑，几乎适用于各种场合

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM评测--带RTX 4070的游戏可转换笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Zephyrus M16（2023）笔记本电脑评测：RTX 4090与超亮的Mini-LED显示屏

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 纤薄的技嘉AERO 16 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。高效的RTX 4070，适合游戏玩家和创作者

Infinix GT Book 16: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Infinix GT Book 16

Asus Vivobook S 14 Flip TP3402VA, i9-13900H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 Flip TP3402VA, i9-13900H

Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16IRH8, i9-13900H RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16IRH8, i9-13900H RTX 4070

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 16 2024

MSI Modern 15 H B13M: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 H B13M

Dell XPS 17 9730, i9-13900H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9730, i9-13900H

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED K5404VA: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED K5404VA

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602V

Dell Precision 5480: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5480

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707VV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707VV

Asus VivoBook S15 OLED K5504, i9-13900H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 OLED K5504, i9-13900H

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VF, i9-13900H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VF, i9-13900H

Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX3404VA, i9-13900H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX3404VA, i9-13900H

HP Zbook Power G10: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Zbook Power G10

Asus VivoBook 16X OLED K3605VV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 16X OLED K3605VV

Asus Vivobook 17X K3704VA: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 17.30", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 17X K3704VA

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602BZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602BZ

Dell Precision 5000 5680: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5000 5680

MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VI, i9-13900H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VI, i9-13900H

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W

HP Envy 16-h1000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 16-h1000

Origin PC EON14-S 2023: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EON14-S 2023

Asus Vivobook 15 OLED L1201W: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 OLED L1201W

Huawei MateBook D 16 2023: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 16 2023

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8

Hyperbook SL606, i9-13900H RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Hyperbook SL606, i9-13900H RTX 4070

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301VU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301VU

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 OLED K6502VU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 OLED K6502VU

Asus Vivobook 14X K3405VC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14X K3405VC

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VU

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602VV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602VV

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VV

Origin PC EVO16-S 2023: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO16-S 2023

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM001W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM001W

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI

Asus VivoBook 14X S3405: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14X S3405

MSI Pulse 15 B13VFK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Pulse 15 B13VFK

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601VI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601VI

MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-053US: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-053US

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603VV-N4007W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2023 GU603VV-N4007W

Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC-M3145X: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC-M3145X

Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070

Huawei MateBook 16s i9: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 16s i9

Minisforum MS-01: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 1.5 kg
   » Minisforum MS-A1 是一款搭载 AMD 处理器的高端微型 PC，内存容量高达 96GB，支持 OCuLink

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 联想Legion Slim第8代上的小细节解决了Alienware x16 r1上的一个恼人的问题

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-H

» Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13705H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13700H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13620H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13600H
   12x 2.1 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13505H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13500H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13420H
   8x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12850HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Raptor Lake-H i9-13900H 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)