Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

AMD Vega 8 R4000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8是用于笔记本电脑的集成GPU。它用于2020年初发布的Renoir一代的Ryzen 7 APU(Ryzen 4000移动版)。GPU基于Vega架构(第五代GCN),具有8个CU(= 704个着色器中的512个)最高主频为1.750 MHz(Ryzen 7 4800U)。性能取决于TDP(启动时为12-25 W),频率,散热和内存配置)。 GPU应该受益于快速的双通道DDR4-3200 RAM(和DDR4-2133单通道相比)。与Raven Ridge一代(Ryzen 2000 Mobile)中类似的Radeon RX Vega 8相比,GPU的时钟频率显着提高(1.750对比1.100 MHz Boost,+ 59%)。

Vega架构在Polaris一代产品上进行了一些改进,现在支持DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1。有关我们的Raven Ridge体系结构的专门文章,请参见更多信息。

由于更高的频率和更快的内存(如果可用),性能明显比旧的RX Vega 8快。它仍然位于入门级(与专用显卡相比),仅适用于要求不高的游戏。

得益于现代的7纳米工艺和巧妙的省电功能,功耗相对较低(根据AMD),因此该图形卡还可用于轻薄型笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerAMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 4000 Series
Vega 8 R4000 512 @ 1750 MHz
Vega 7 448 @ 1600 MHz
Vega 5 320 @ 1400 MHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed1750 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology7 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement07.01.2020
CPU in Vega 8 R4000GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H8 x 3300 MHz, 45 W? MHz1750 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS8 x 3000 MHz, 35 W? MHz1750 MHz
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U8 x 1800 MHz, 15 W? MHz1750 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
16.1 pt (18%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -91%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M -4%
AMD FirePro W5170M -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P600 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P620 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 8%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 1227     avg: 1283     median: 1282.5 (7%)     max: 1338 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
1173 Points (6%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
186037 Points (34%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
100334 Points (14%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
22962 Points (34%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
27160 Points (14%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
3622 Points (12%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
3938 Points (9%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
127933 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
6301 points (16%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
6085 points (10%)
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P620 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M 0%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
AMD Radeon HD 7870 2%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9%
AMD Radeon Pro 460 11%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 12%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 865%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
572 Samples/s (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
1030 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
3498 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
42.8 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
46.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
49 Watt (11%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
60.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
66.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
39.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
80.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
79.7 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.5 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.4 fps