Notebookcheck

惠普EliteBook 830 G8商务笔记本回顾。1,000尼特SureView面板仍有问题

现在也有了5G。 惠普的EliteBook 830紧凑型次笔记本在第八代中得到了一个新的Tiger Lake 处理器,但它坚持使用熟悉的16:9显示器。1,000尼特的SureView显示器可以保护用户免受窥视,但它仍然对图像质量有影响。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Business Intel Evo / Project Athena Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Thunderbolt Ultrabook Windows 5G

去年

,HP EliteBook 830的全面更新后,第八代的变化仅限于新的处理器和一些连接功能。这款紧凑的商务副本可使用英特尔最新的Tiger Lake 处理器,也可在835 G8型号中使用AMD的Ryzen 5000芯片。</p> <p style>我们的测试设备的型号为3C7Y8EA,配置非常全面。花费大约2900欧元(约合人民币3410元),客户可以得到酷睿i7-1165G7处理器、32GB内存、1TB PCIe固态硬盘和一个集成的5G调制解调器。此外,还内置了特别明亮的1000尼特显示器,并提供一个集成的隐私过滤器(SureView)。在最低配置的变体中(酷睿i5,8GB内存,256GB固态硬盘),EliteBook 830 G8的起价大约为1300欧元(约1528美元)。<br />

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, X133NVFF R0, IPS, SureView, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 900 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 0 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, Snapdragon X55, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 308 x 205
Battery
53 Wh, 4400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt power adapter (USB-C), HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.329 kg, Power Supply: 310 g
Price
2,900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
08/2021
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg18 mm13.30"1920x1080
89 %
08/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg18.2 mm13.30"1920x1200
85 %
05/2021
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.5 mm13.50"2256x1504
88 %
03/2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm13.90"3000x2000
87 %
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.8 mm13.40"3840x2400

外壳--EliteBook采用优质铝制外壳

在EliteBook 830去年才在其第七代 ,得到一个全新的外壳后,今年没有任何变化。铝制外壳看起来仍然非常高端,而且制造得非常完美。稳定性非常高,无论是基本单元还是显示屏盖子都是如此。我们特别喜欢中央铰链,因为盖子可以用一只手轻松打开,但同时,它足够坚固,可以有效防止盖子晃动。最大开孔角度约为160度。

EliteBook的设计看起来非常清醒,银色外壳和黑色对比元素(键盘、显示屏边框)的组合对消费者和商业用户来说都很合适。显示屏边框在上次的外壳更新后变得更窄,但特别是在面板的顶部和底部仍然相当宽。这表明惠普仍在使用16:9的面板,而许多竞争对手已经转回16:10的格式。尽管如此,EliteBook 830 G8整体看起来非常现代。

EliteBook 830 G8是我们对比组中最紧凑的机型之一;只有XPS 13,占地面积略小。另一方面,我们的竞争对手在重量上没有什么不同(都是~1.3公斤)。

Size comparison

308 mm 205 mm 18 mm 1.3 kg307.9 mm 204.5 mm 18.1 mm 1.3 kg305.8 mm 217.1 mm 18.2 mm 1.3 kg308 mm 223 mm 14.5 mm 1.3 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.3 kg

连接性 - 惠普提供了一个可选的5G调制解调器

端口布局保持不变,但对Tiger Lake 处理器的更新也增加了新的Thunderbolt 4端口(USB 4,40 Gb/s)。惠普继续包括熟悉的旧电源适配器的电源端口,但附带的电源适配器使用USB-C。

左边:Kensington锁,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,3.5毫米音频插孔,智能卡阅读器
左边:Kensington锁,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,3.5毫米音频插孔,智能卡阅读器
右边。纳米SIM卡,2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(USB 4, 40 Gb/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0b,电源
右边。纳米SIM卡,2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(USB 4, 40 Gb/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0b,电源

沟通

就像的前身 ,这里也使用了英特尔的无线AX201 WLAN模块。在我们与Netgear Nighthawk RAX120参考路由器的测试中,传输速率非常好,而且支持包括蓝牙5.2在内的所有重要标准。然而,一些竞争对手已经提供了更快的Wi-Fi 6E模块。

可选的是,惠普还提供LTE或5G调制解调器。我们的测试设备支持5G(Snapdragon X55),可以使用eSIM卡,也可以使用nano SIM卡。我们测试了一张来自Telekom的nano SIM卡,它被立即检测到并正常工作。接收情况比智能手机好,即使在城市的室内,我们也能达到80-90 Mb/s的速度。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1602 (1477min - 1662max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1430 (1283min - 1491max) MBit/s ∼89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1380 (667min - 1483max) MBit/s ∼86% -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1365 (955min - 1588max) MBit/s ∼85% -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=260)
1157 MBit/s ∼72% -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1129 (947min - 1229max) MBit/s ∼70% -21%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
984 (796min - 1076max) MBit/s ∼61% -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (49.8 - 1614, n=103, last 2 years)
886 MBit/s ∼55% -38%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1547 (819min - 1624max) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1524 (1322min - 1649max) MBit/s ∼99% +10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1501 (1471min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼97% +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1401 (1271min - 1454max) MBit/s ∼91% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 (699min - 1462max) MBit/s ∼90%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1387 (1329min - 1458max) MBit/s ∼90% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=260)
1248 MBit/s ∼81% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (240 - 1658, n=103, last 2 years)
986 MBit/s ∼64% -29%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016506991407135914491413136714391433128913601438141914621443122014221437135813491426143213551359143213951371139913991293136715311461154314501576162115181607132214881433157715211499133914621511149414891467153016231635158216471555142215301649162769914071359144914131367143914331289136014381419146214431220142214371358134914261432135513591432139513711399139912931367153114611543145015761621151816071322148814331577152114991339146215111494148914671530162316351582164715551422153016491627140614541441142913471458145714591411147714401307146514641447128314161445149114321439145713991407139714331486143814561476163216161616161515981651166115941644161315131592156216001531151516371477166215951654158115931614165015961585161516401616Tooltip
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1366 (699-1462)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1524 (1322-1649)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1431 (1283-1491)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1602 (1477-1662)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头没有变化。仍然使用带有机械快门的720p模块,即使在良好的照明条件下,它也不能提供特别好的图像质量。也有一个用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头。

ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7: 10.41 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 19.13 ∆E

安全问题

安全问题在EliteBook笔记本电脑系列中非常重要。开箱后,已经有几个全面的软件解决方案,当然还有TPM 2.0芯片以及指纹扫描仪和可选的智能卡阅读器等功能。此外,EliteBook 830 G8和835 G8都被惠普配备了提供高级安全和管理功能的处理器(分别为英特尔vPro和AMD Ryzen Pro)。

维护

底部的盖子只用几颗十字头螺钉固定,可以非常容易地取下。内存和M.2-2280固态硬盘都在额外的盖子下,但这些都可以很容易地拆掉。一款紧凑的微型笔记本仍然提供两个SODIMM插槽,而不是焊接的RAM,这已经成为一个罕见的事实。两个通信模块(WLAN和WWAN)也可以被替换。

室内
室内
室内
室内

输入设备 - 830 G8带有可靠的键盘

黑色chiclet键盘基本上没有变化,仍然是移动领域中最好的输入设备之一。由于联想在ThinkPad X13

,例如采用了一个行程较小的较差的键盘,现在这两个竞争对手在这方面至少是持平的;主观上,我们实际上更喜欢EliteBook的键盘一些。由于采用了两段式白色背光,在较暗的环境中工作也没有任何问题。

EliteBook 830 G7 ,PointStick及其专用鼠标按钮被取消。点击板的使用没有问题,但按照现代标准,它不是特别大,只有11 x 6.3厘米。你可以点击它的下部区域,ClickPad会以一种低沉而复杂的噪音作出反应。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

显示屏 - 1,000尼特的SureView屏幕

子像素网格
子像素网格

如前所述,惠普仍在使用熟悉的16:9格式的13.3英寸显示屏。我们的测试设备配备了可选的SureView面板,该面板带有一个集成的隐私过滤器;它应该可以达到1000cd/m²的亮度。根据我们的测量,我们可以确认这一点,但与早期的SureView面板一样,有一些问题。SureView只在较低的亮度范围内工作,因此在明亮的环境中很难使用。此外,当你按下相应的键启用SureView时,亮度调节会变得很混乱。我们在下表中收集了测量的亮度水平。

Helligkeitmessung in cd/m²
Brightness 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Normal 1,007 773 607 489 405 345 285 235 188 145 108
SureView 110 102 94 85 76 69 60 52 26 16 3.5

在我们的测量中,亮度传感器和英特尔GPU驱动程序的省电选项被停用,但当SureView被启用时,我们仍然能够记录不同的数值(最大约为250cd/m²);然而,这些数值并不总是可重复的。一般来说,这种配置(SureView只在最低亮度光谱下工作)是有问题的,因为你实际上是被迫在较暗的环境中使用SureView,因为超过100cd/m²的最低亮度太高了。

屏幕轻微出血
屏幕轻微出血

该面板的主观图像印象并不好,因为即使关闭了SureView功能,可视角度也是有限的,即使是对中央甜蜜点的微小偏离(包括垂直和水平方向)也会分别导致亮度和对比度的明显损失。此外,明亮的区域看起来有点颗粒感。我们没能检测到PWM,尽管亮度很高,但屏幕出血并不是一个大问题。

1040
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
1014
cd/m²
1007
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
965
cd/m²
1006
cd/m²
977
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X133NVFF R0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1040 cd/m² Average: 984.8 cd/m² Minimum: 107 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 1004 cd/m²
Contrast: 2962:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
X133NVFF R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
3%
-3%
-4%
11%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
69.2
71.1
3%
64.72
-6%
64.91
-6%
80.15
16%
65.67
-5%
sRGB Coverage
94.5
99.7
6%
97.22
3%
94.42
0%
99.97
6%
97.39
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.1
71.1
0%
66.87
-6%
66.34
-7%
78.94
11%
67.37
-5%
Response Times
38%
-37%
14%
-34%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (20, 25)
30.8 (14.8, 16)
32%
62.8 (30.4, 32.4)
-40%
37.6 (17.6, 20)
16%
59.2 (30, 29.2)
-32%
46.8 (24, 22.8)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17, 13)
17.2 (8.4, 8.8)
43%
39.8 (21.2, 18)
-33%
26.4 (11.6, 14.8)
12%
40.4 (22.4, 18)
-35%
32 (15.6, 16.4)
-7%
PWM Frequency
21930 (50)
2137 (31)
26600 (62)
Screen
-5%
3%
10%
-2%
-2%
Brightness middle
1007
320
-68%
413
-59%
502
-50%
508.7
-49%
454.5
-55%
Brightness
985
310
-69%
400
-59%
474
-52%
479
-51%
435
-56%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
94
8%
89
2%
84
-3%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.34
0.24
29%
0.29
15%
0.33
3%
0.3
12%
0.27
21%
Contrast
2962
1333
-55%
1424
-52%
1521
-49%
1696
-43%
1683
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
2.7
32%
2.8
30%
1.35
66%
2.72
32%
3.12
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
7.6
15%
7.2
19%
3.67
59%
4.7
47%
4.85
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.4
0.9
62%
0.8
67%
1.2
50%
1.92
20%
1.97
18%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
4.1
5%
1.9
56%
1.7
60%
3.4
21%
3.1
28%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.24 98%
2.11 104%
2.01 109%
CCT
6462 101%
6429 101%
6510 100%
6440 101%
6245 104%
6902 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.6
61.1
70.7
61.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.2
94.3
100
97
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 3%
-12% / -4%
7% / 7%
-8% / -3%
-3% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

工厂校准并不坏,虽然只有轻微的色差,但肉眼几乎看不到。然而,启用SureView后,图像质量明显恶化。颜色偏差更大,灰度现在也显示出更暖的色温,并结合明显的红色色调。

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - 带有SureView的灰度尺
CalMAN - 带有SureView的灰度尺
CalMAN - 使用SureView的饱和度
CalMAN - 使用SureView的饱和度
CalMAN - 带有SureView的ColorChecker
CalMAN - 带有SureView的ColorChecker
CalMAN - 校准了灰度
CalMAN - 校准了灰度
CalMAN - 饱和度校准
CalMAN - 饱和度校准
CalMAN - 校准了ColorChecker
CalMAN - 校准了ColorChecker

我们可以通过校准(CalMAN和X-Rite i1 Pro 2)改善一下色彩再现,但对于商业环境来说,这并不是真正必要的。此外,蓝色的高色彩偏差仍然存在,这意味着该面板不是编辑图像的理想选择。至少较小的sRGB色彩空间几乎被完全映射。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15324 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

由于亮度高,即使在非常明亮的环境中,哑光显示屏仍然可以很好地使用,只要你将屏幕远离阳光。然而,这只适用于禁用SureView时。

在阳光下(禁用SureView)。
在阳光下(禁用SureView)。
在阳光下(禁用SureView)。
在阳光下(禁用SureView)。
在阳光下(启用SureView)。
在阳光下(启用SureView)。

总的来说,即使没有启用SureView技术,可视角度的稳定性也明显不如其他IPS显示屏。激活它甚至进一步限制了视角,例如,坐在你旁边的人几乎无法看清屏幕上的内容。因此,从原则上讲,它可以按预期工作,但由于有很强的局限性,我们建议使用400cd/m²的普通全高清面板,因为在这种情况下你仍然可以使用外部隐私过滤器(箔)。

视角 - 禁用SureView
视角 - 禁用SureView
视角 - 启用SureView
视角 - 启用SureView
视角 - 启用SureView
视角 - 启用SureView

性能 - 英特尔Tiger Lake U

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1165G7

著名的Core i7-1165G7在我们的测试设备中以四个核心和高达4.7 GHz的最大涡轮增压时钟速度运行。开始时,处理器被允许短暂地消耗高达46瓦的功率,但几秒钟后,消耗量稳定在20瓦,相当于4倍~3.0GHz。这种设计相当保守,使得性能不是特别高,也不一定比前代产品EliteBook 830 G7

CPU的性能对许多任务来说是足够的,特别是在商业环境中,但恰恰是目前的AMD Ryzen CPU在多核应用中提供了明显的性能,特别是。如果你可以不用Thunderbolt/USB 4,EliteBook 835 G8将是一个不错的选择。

在电池供电的情况下,几秒钟后能源消耗被限制在15瓦,这也解释了为什么性能也略差(-10%至-15%)。进一步的CPU基准测试可以在这里找到Mobile Processors - Benchmark List

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140726.07687.73696.09701.03687715.32686.61708.03692.38700.94695.11714.34689.83699.17689.43702.31691.96697.56699.26715.65674.81720.37706.9682.1717.08973.71864.42851.14844.45839.4831.55829.82825.68825.81823.18823.3820.09820.38818.26819.07813.87815.83812.36779.33741.02761.75845.58837.43835.02825.35967.7866.31859.64851.41859.77853.33859.35862.57859.53855.05854.54848.18850.43850.74809.52747.26749.02750.03749.36751.09751.37755.59753.72752.19751.4599.46464.15467.03497.7485.64558.05607.73603.27608.09602.36606.79608.75605.88605.13611.41611.72612.42616.8615.92622.5618.43618.09634.49626.3631.46630.42629.73633.13632.92632.6632.23630.98629.64633.17633.36631.17632.94632.9632.62631.83632.35633.71631.76629.9630.62634.96631.59633.24633.88634.43870.74775.15769.25742.98772.1726.07690.97762.14749.93665.32717.66761.53703.17670.06751.36738.47655.99722.22755.03676.78688.24757.49727.56631.55707.06762.4703.38646.05734.03730.89652.79720.8732.98648.34711.78745.35655.31664.09744.92713.76634.84710749.48677.15634.67731.3736.13644.42691.41751.921160.361134.431127.781129.431123.751123.341122.211119.231118.11117.851121.041115.821117.721114.361110.831104.421107.971106.711110.031110.121108.861108.491107.391110.741107.45Tooltip
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø700 (674.81-726.07)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø827 (741.02-973.71)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø817 (747.26-967.7)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø714 (631.55-870.74)
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U: Ø1118 (1104.42-1160.36)
在Cinebench R15多重循环中的CPU测量结果
在Cinebench R15多重循环中的CPU测量结果
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1526 Points ∼100% +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1525 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1440 Points ∼94% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1263 - 1534, n=41)
1429 Points ∼94% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1365 Points ∼89%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1350 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (409 - 1526, n=43, last 2 years)
1306 Points ∼86% -4%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5750 Points ∼100% +52%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (965 - 12181, n=45, last 2 years)
5549 Points ∼97% +47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5139 Points ∼89% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (3773 - 6862, n=46)
5123 Points ∼89% +35%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5062 (4319.28min - 5062.12max) Points ∼88% +34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4043 (3994.31min - 4043max) Points ∼70% +7%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
3786 Points ∼66%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
591 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
574 Points ∼97% +14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
567 Points ∼96% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (471 - 588, n=63)
554 Points ∼94% +10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
522 Points ∼88% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
505 Points ∼85%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
453 Points ∼77% -10%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
444 Points ∼75% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (73 - 591, n=108, last 2 years)
433 Points ∼73% -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2561 Points ∼100% +72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2188 Points ∼85% +47%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1285 - 2657, n=63)
1972 Points ∼77% +32%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1936 Points ∼76% +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1912 Points ∼75% +28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (110 - 4704, n=108, last 2 years)
1707 Points ∼67% +15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points ∼61% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1516 Points ∼59% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1490 Points ∼58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
228 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
226 Points ∼99% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (199 - 230, n=57)
218 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
217.07 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
209 Points ∼92% -5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
182 Points ∼80% -18%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
175 Points ∼77% -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 237, n=108, last 2 years)
169 Points ∼74% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
1160 (1104.42min - 1160.36max) Points ∼100% +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
973.71 Points ∼84% +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
967.7 Points ∼83% +26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
870.74 (631.55min - 870.74max) Points ∼75% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (599 - 1027, n=65)
856 Points ∼74% +11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (82.3 - 2024, n=114, last 2 years)
775 Points ∼67% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
769 (674.81min - 726.07max) Points ∼66%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
635 (464.15min - 634.96max) Points ∼55% -17%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4.2 - 6277, n=96, last 2 years)
875 Seconds * ∼100% -31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Seconds * ∼85% -12%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
695 Seconds * ∼79% -4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
666 Seconds * ∼76%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
652 Seconds * ∼75% +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
625 Seconds * ∼71% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (468 - 958, n=62)
613 Seconds * ∼70% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
541 Seconds * ∼62% +19%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
429 Seconds * ∼49% +36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5354 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5274 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5233 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (4651 - 5507, n=62)
5224 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5140 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5099 MIPS ∼95% -5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
4794 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 5800, n=98, last 2 years)
4322 MIPS ∼81% -19%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
4202 MIPS ∼78% -22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
32062 MIPS ∼100% +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25265 MIPS ∼79% +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
23422 MIPS ∼73% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (15556 - 27405, n=62)
22955 MIPS ∼72% +15%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
21925 MIPS ∼68% +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3267 - 54374, n=98, last 2 years)
21572 MIPS ∼67% +8%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
20478 MIPS ∼64% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19919 MIPS ∼62%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19404 MIPS ∼61% -3%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1561 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1547 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1546 Points ∼99% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1533 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (882 - 1595, n=62)
1515 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1454 Points ∼93% -7%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1274 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (293 - 1740, n=100, last 2 years)
1180 Points ∼76% -24%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
1065 Points ∼68% -32%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5791 Points ∼100% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5785 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5653 Points ∼98% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5409 Points ∼93%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5186 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1821 - 5926, n=62)
5146 Points ∼89% -5%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
4616 Points ∼80% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (591 - 7590, n=100, last 2 years)
4339 Points ∼75% -20%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
3671 Points ∼63% -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
7.85 fps ∼100% +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.97 fps ∼89% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1.39 - 8.47, n=62)
6.34 fps ∼81% +10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.97 fps ∼76% +4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.76 fps ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.58 fps ∼71% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.65 - 14.8, n=94, last 2 years)
5.58 fps ∼71% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.23 fps ∼67% -9%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
5.16 fps ∼66% -10%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
86.6 s * ∼100% -52%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.9 - 281, n=88, last 2 years)
69.2 s * ∼80% -21%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
67.8 s * ∼78% -19%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
57.1 s * ∼66%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
51.9 s * ∼60% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (21.5 - 88.1, n=61)
48.6 s * ∼56% +15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
47.7 s * ∼55% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * ∼53% +20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.8 s * ∼52% +22%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.501 - 2.21, n=94, last 2 years)
0.744 sec * ∼100% -33%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
0.658 sec * ∼88% -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
0.651 sec * ∼88% -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.605 sec * ∼81% -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.605 sec * ∼81% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (0.552 - 1.002, n=62)
0.59 sec * ∼79% -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.583 sec * ∼78% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.581 sec * ∼78% -4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.561 sec * ∼75%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
769 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
221 Points
Help

系统性能

尽管CPU的性能有些一般,但对系统性能的主观印象却很好。首先,这仍然是一个强大的移动处理器,而且正如预期的那样,EliteBook还配备了一个快速的PCIe固态硬盘,导致设备对输入作出反应时没有明显的延迟。合成PCMark 10基准测试也产生了非常好的结果。

与其他一些较新的惠普笔记本电脑一样,系统并不总是顺利地进入待机模式。有时,你会注意到风扇仍在运转,在最坏的情况下,电池就会被不必要地耗尽。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
5105 Points ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5034 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4531 - 5454, n=39)
4962 Points ∼97% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4872 Points ∼95% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points ∼95% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4809 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (790 - 6414, n=104, last 2 years)
4191 Points ∼82% -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4185 Points ∼82% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10184 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
10065 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8997 - 11505, n=39)
10059 Points ∼99% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9682 Points ∼95% 0%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9645 Points ∼95%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
9325 Points ∼92% -3%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8465 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2544 - 10836, n=104, last 2 years)
8463 Points ∼83% -12%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6971 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
6926 Points ∼99% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6774 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5570 - 7136, n=39)
6736 Points ∼97% -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6719 Points ∼96% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
6636 Points ∼95% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6622 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1304 - 9852, n=104, last 2 years)
6291 Points ∼90% -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5298 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
5180 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4083 - 5550, n=39)
4906 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4894 Points ∼92% -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4879 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4583 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 6709, n=104, last 2 years)
3825 Points ∼72% -28%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
3373 Points ∼64% -36%
PCMark 10 Score
5034 points
Help

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),测试设备显示出高延迟问题。因此,在目前的BIOS版本下,它不适合实时音频应用,但这仍可能随着未来的更新而改变。不过,播放视频时至少没有掉帧。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1318 μs * ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1271.96 μs * ∼97% +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1225.4 μs * ∼93% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
1047.9 μs * ∼80% +20%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
633.4 μs * ∼48% +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
602.9 μs * ∼46% +54%

* ... smaller is better

储存

虽然EliteBook 830 G8仍然不支持新的PCIe 4.0接口,但内置的三星PM981a以非常高的传输速率令人信服。1TB的存储容量(设置后约900GB可用)也应该完全满足大多数用户的需求。进一步的固态硬盘基准测试可在这里Laptop SSD & HDD Benchmarks

HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
-38%
16%
-19%
-8%
-3%
Write 4K
133.05
171.44
29%
118.21
-11%
197.5
48%
86.04
-35%
118.3
-11%
142 (76.2 - 229, n=33)
7%
Read 4K
58.04
70.8
22%
37.54
-35%
52.94
-9%
40.11
-31%
60.36
4%
50 (34.3 - 75.5, n=33)
-14%
Write Seq
2031.53
1770.65
-13%
1016.79
-50%
2174
7%
1738
-14%
2067
2%
2019 (776 - 2975, n=32)
-1%
Read Seq
2455.57
1755.18
-29%
925.87
-62%
2156
-12%
1553
-37%
2394
-3%
1976 (973 - 2639, n=32)
-20%
Write 4K Q32T1
461.91
524.91
14%
354.16
-23%
632
37%
454.9
-2%
325.5
-30%
470 (268 - 656, n=33)
2%
Read 4K Q32T1
454.22
479.54
6%
352.59
-22%
693.7
53%
385.4
-15%
332.2
-27%
504 (289 - 730, n=33)
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
3021.1
2818.3
-7%
1174.2
-61%
3017
0%
2784
-8%
2978
-1%
2893 (788 - 3033, n=33)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3534.4
3547.5
0%
2261.1
-36%
3561
1%
3217
-9%
3552
0%
3474 (2853 - 3568, n=33)
-2%
AS SSD
74%
-14%
60%
-2%
-32%
37%
Seq Read
2797
2776
-1%
1821
-35%
2794.16
0%
2143.76
-23%
2081.05
-26%
2513 (1938 - 3066, n=33)
-10%
Seq Write
1528
1461
-4%
794
-48%
2384.89
56%
1389.21
-9%
1432.8
-6%
2084 (1248 - 2837, n=33)
36%
4K Read
54.27
63.78
18%
47.54
-12%
60.69
12%
49.77
-8%
49.92
-8%
53.6 (45 - 68.4, n=33)
-1%
4K Write
128.45
209.44
63%
141.6
10%
180.77
41%
105.02
-18%
119.06
-7%
132 (87.4 - 208, n=33)
3%
4K-64 Read
1095.04
1147.87
5%
782.08
-29%
1768.18
61%
855.33
-22%
585.08
-47%
1497 (858 - 2093, n=33)
37%
4K-64 Write
1640.43
1622.57
-1%
765.92
-53%
1800.07
10%
1659.75
1%
1629.85
-1%
1795 (1074 - 2152, n=33)
9%
Access Time Read *
0.041
0.032
22%
0.191
-366%
0.037
10%
0.058
-41%
0.043
-5%
0.0486 (0.032 - 0.087, n=32)
-19%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.019
37%
0.027
10%
0.073
-143%
0.272
-807%
0.097
-223%
0.0415 (0.017 - 0.128, n=33)
-38%
Score Read
1429
1489
4%
1012
-29%
2108
48%
1119
-22%
843
-41%
1802 (1154 - 2449, n=33)
26%
Score Write
1922
1978
3%
987
-49%
2219
15%
1904
-1%
1892
-2%
2135 (1471 - 2527, n=33)
11%
Score Total
4029
4178
4%
2477
-39%
5392
34%
3570
-11%
3149
-22%
4843 (3309 - 6095, n=33)
20%
Copy ISO MB/s
2715.16
1832.78
-32%
1243.18
-54%
2064.65
-24%
1929.19
-29%
2452.1
-10%
2147 (1131 - 2932, n=21)
-21%
Copy Program MB/s
130.06
992.5
663%
627.74
383%
733.52
464%
1012.48
678%
72.23
-44%
527 (123 - 803, n=21)
305%
Copy Game MB/s
459.27
1607.14
250%
975.91
112%
1628.53
255%
1736.66
278%
403.97
-12%
1177 (441 - 1830, n=21)
156%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
39% / 48%
-26% / -23%
38% / 44%
-11% / -8%
-20% / -24%
17% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3534.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3021.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 454.22 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.91 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2455.57 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2031.53 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 133.05 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034203062.643517.443523.723524.263526.023527.283528.323529.163529.373529.373529.373529.373533.143533.143533.553533.763533.973533.973534.183534.183536.643536.853536.93537.063537.273537.323537.323537.953538.733538.943539.213540.253540.463540.883541.33541.33541.463542.143542.143544.863545.283545.283545.693546.493547.163547.963549.253550.513554.273554.88Tooltip
: Ø3528 (3062.64-3554.88)

显卡 - 英特尔Xe Graphics G7 96 EUs

GPU-Z。英特尔Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z。英特尔Xe Graphics G7

该处理器集成的Xe Graphics G7,负责图形处理。这是速度更快的版本,有96个处理单元,这也得益于RAM的双通道配置。然而,iGPU与LPDDR4X内存结合使用时,其速度仍然要快几个百分点。尽管如此,前辈旧版UHD Graphics性能明显超过了它,新的iGPU在合成测试中的速度是2-3倍。此外,性能也保持稳定,因为苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试以98%完成。

有了更强大的iGPU,旧的或要求不高的游戏往往可以顺利播放,至少在低细节方面。但无论如何,这在一台商务笔记本电脑中起着次要作用。

与处理器一样,图形性能在电池电量上大约降低10-15%。额外的GPU基准测试可在我们专门的基准测试部分

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
6878 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6711 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4841 - 7090, n=58)
6423 Points ∼93% +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6294 Points ∼92% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6218 Points ∼90%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5339 Points ∼78% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (410 - 12199, n=100, last 2 years)
4360 Points ∼63% -30%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
1923 Points ∼28% -69%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
29901 Points ∼100% +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
29609 Points ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (19487 - 38040, n=50)
27279 Points ∼91% +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26910 Points ∼90% +2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
26820 Points ∼90% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26433 Points ∼88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1652 - 53539, n=79, last 2 years)
18437 Points ∼62% -30%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
11127 Points ∼37% -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5498 Points ∼100% +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5455 Points ∼99% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5202 Points ∼95% +11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5169 Points ∼94% +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (3113 - 5909, n=64)
4919 Points ∼89% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4676 Points ∼85%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (313 - 8743, n=103, last 2 years)
2957 Points ∼54% -37%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
1380 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1607 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1603 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1563 Points ∼97% +6%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1470 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (994 - 1819, n=64)
1453 Points ∼90% -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1430 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (116 - 3276, n=87, last 2 years)
1015 Points ∼63% -31%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
432 Points ∼27% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
6302 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
80566 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16722 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4168 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1617 points
Help
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 77.5 65.6 22 8.79 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72 49 25.9 13 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 116 71.6 49.4 46.8 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.8 20.1 14.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 19.2 18.6 17.7 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 43 23 21 20 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 83.3 34.3 27.9 22.5 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 87 41 33 21 fps

排放--EliteBook保持安静

噪声排放

单个风扇总体上非常安静,即使在负载下,也只能听到安静的嘶嘶声。在低负荷和闲置状态下,风扇通常是完全关闭的,但每当这时,它就会无缘无故地启动。我们已经在过去几个月的其他惠普笔记本电脑中看到了这种行为。除此以外,我们无法检测到任何电子噪音或线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load
35.4 / 35.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise
-2%
2%
4%
-1%
-2%
off / environment *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.4
2%
27.7
-7%
26.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.6
2%
27.8
-7%
27.1
-4%
Idle Average *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.6
2%
27.8
-7%
27.1
-4%
Idle Maximum *
27.5
29
-5%
24.2
12%
25.6
7%
27.8
-1%
27.1
1%
Load Average *
35.4
37.4
-6%
39.5
-12%
28.7
19%
27.9
21%
31.4
11%
Load Maximum *
35.3
37.4
-6%
39.5
-12%
38.2
-8%
37
-5%
39
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.4
32
32.8

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.629.232.630.133.62534.939.136.131.934.93142.94242.136.942.94031.930.33028.731.9502926.930.929.9296327.928.228.134.427.98031.823.32019.531.810020.519.118.818.120.512523.319.420.117.923.316018.518.418.516.218.520017.21918.515.617.225016.618.318.614.816.631516.720.219.914.916.740014.818.819.113.914.850013.320.721.113.413.36301320.620.812.81380015.922.322.712.215.9100017.224.224.712.317.2125015.222.92312.415.2160015.924.824.912.415.9200016.425.625.812.516.4250015.825.825.612.915.831501625.325.313.316400014.823.723.613.314.8500014.224.12413.614.2630013.717.617.513.713.7800013.915.415.413.713.91000013.814.915.213.613.81250013.51414.413.413.516000131313.612.713SPL27.535.335.425.327.5N0.92.12.10.70.9median 15.8median 20.2median 20.1median 13.4median 15.8Delta1.22.931.11.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7

温度

当涉及到表面温度时,保守的处理器配置具有积极的作用,因为即使在满负荷的情况下,也只有少数地方达到40℃(约104°F)以上。在日常使用中,机箱几乎没有升温。

在压力测试中,功耗定格在19瓦左右,处理器和显卡都需要分担这个功率(CPU:4倍~1.5-1.6GHz;iGPU:~680MHz)。压力测试后没有直接的性能损失。

压力测试中的CPU和iGPU测量值
压力测试中的CPU和iGPU测量值
Max. Load
 34.2 °C41.7 °C35.7 °C 
 32.3 °C37.9 °C35.3 °C 
 29 °C30 °C30.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
36.7 °C39.1 °C32.9 °C
35.6 °C37.2 °C33.6 °C
32.4 °C33.1 °C31.1 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.6 °C | Room Temperature 23.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
热图--空闲(顶部
热图--空闲(顶部
热图--空闲(底部
热图--空闲(底部
热图 - 压力测试(顶部
热图 - 压力测试(顶部
热图--压力测试(底部
热图--压力测试(底部

发言人

虽然键盘旁边的两个立体声扬声器不会变得非常响亮,但它们以对中音和高音的干净再现而令人信服,这在再现声音时尤其积极。使用这些模块,即使是播放视频和听一些音乐也没有问题,而且耳机或外部扬声器也不是绝对必要的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.430.130.42532.731.932.73141.536.941.54029.728.729.75030.329.930.36323.434.423.48028.619.528.610038.718.138.712545.217.945.216049.716.249.720049.715.649.725054.414.854.431561.814.961.840067.113.967.150066.813.466.863067.212.867.280066.212.266.2100068.812.368.812506712.467160068.312.468.3200069.912.569.9250070.812.970.831507213.372400069.513.369.5500066.213.666.2630062.513.762.5800066.413.766.41000064.913.664.91250064.313.464.3160006312.763SPL80.525.380.5N49.30.749.3median 66.2median 13.4median 66.2Delta4.21.14.238.139.828.737.333.343.333.24229.734.82534.922.332.824.133.42131.921.935.719.648.220.649.615.753.215.1621466.916.269.213.366.515.263.813.468.512.869.112.165.511.563.611.663.211.963.512.363.512.464.512.659.412.558.612.355.611.749.625.577.40.740.8median 13.3median 63.22.77.545.142.445.137.735.437.735.230.635.232.330.632.340.329.840.334.329.934.330.629.630.63527.93549.631.949.65730.6576026.76067.120.267.167.422.867.466.819.966.870.416.670.474.215.274.273.114.873.177.114.177.175.413.975.474.313.774.371.713.671.773.713.873.770.713.370.76913.2697213.27269.113.269.168.513.468.569.713.169.766.813.166.86412.56484.627.884.664.7164.7median 69.1median 13.9median 69.14.73.74.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GEDell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--具有良好续航能力的惠普次笔记本

能源消耗

当涉及到功耗时,明亮的面板需要付出代价,因为在全亮度的情况下,空闲功耗是旧的EliteBook 830 G7,低功率1080p显示屏(400 cd/m²)的两倍。在满负荷状态下,消耗量很快就稳定在30瓦以上,这意味着附带的65瓦电源适配器完全足够了。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 2.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.5 / 8.4 / 10.3 Watt
Load midlight 34.6 / 33 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
HP EliteBook 830 G7
i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-1%
-21%
-8%
6%
-8%
5%
Idle Minimum *
6.5
2.8
57%
2.6
60%
6.7
-3%
4.3
34%
3.6
45%
4.37 (2.2 - 9.8, n=58)
33%
3.93 (1.67 - 10.7, n=109, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Average *
8.4
5.9
30%
6
29%
10
-19%
8.3
1%
4.7
44%
7.65 (4.8 - 16.4, n=58)
9%
6.95 (4.6 - 13.6, n=109, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
10.3
6.8
34%
8.2
20%
10.3
-0%
8.8
15%
5.1
50%
9.31 (5.8 - 16.9, n=58)
10%
8.83 (4.4 - 15.7, n=109, last 2 years)
14%
Load Average *
34.6
41.5
-20%
41.4
-20%
35.7
-3%
46.2
-34%
33.3
4%
38.6 (12.5 - 54.3, n=58)
-12%
35.4 (8.3 - 79.2, n=110, last 2 years)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.4
34.2
1%
32.7
5%
42.2
-23%
Load Maximum *
33
68.2
-107%
64.1
-94%
67.6
-105%
47.3
-43%
70
-112%
59.6 (30.1 - 99.3, n=58)
-81%
48.3 (14 - 101, n=109, last 2 years)
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test

05101520253035404546.945.740.436.545.53737.639.639.338.939.738.737.8373738.539.93738.240.840.134.535.435.934.637.134.636.437.236.734.634.534.335.335.935.535.534.535.134.135.834.434.834.336.133.535.634.434.434.635.934.235.733.73434.135.435.233.433.93434.23433.834.134.933.734.633.533.535.934.134.233.633.834.933.633.633.533.233.335.334.433.834.334.433.533.233.933.734.332.933.73533.433.933.634.933.633.834.934.333.835.433.435.833.733.735.233.534.934.733.735.233.733.833.634.434.632.931.731.631.431.831.831.931.932.933.13232.332.833.232.432.232.332.332.233.533.533.232.532.432.532.132.333.232.53332.532.432.332.632.333.632.132.432.532.532.632.633.432.432.432.332.432.433.332.532.533.533.532.732.332.332.43332.432.432.432.546.945.740.436.545.53737.639.639.338.939.738.737.8373738.539.93738.240.840.134.535.435.934.637.134.636.437.236.734.634.534.335.335.935.535.534.535.134.135.834.434.834.336.133.535.634.434.434.635.934.235.733.73434.135.435.233.433.93434.23433.834.134.933.734.633.533.535.934.134.233.633.834.933.633.633.533.233.335.334.433.834.334.433.533.233.933.734.332.933.73533.433.933.634.933.633.834.934.333.835.433.435.833.733.735.233.534.934.733.735.233.733.833.634.434.632.931.731.631.431.831.831.931.932.933.13232.332.833.232.432.232.332.332.233.533.533.232.532.432.532.132.333.232.53332.532.432.332.632.333.632.132.432.532.532.632.633.432.432.432.332.432.433.332.532.533.533.532.732.332.332.43332.432.432.432.533.432.132.831.932.232.932.932.632.432.733.332.833.733.132.833.134.234.533.232.834.333.133.733.132.932.93334.832.733.333.333.433.833.633.634.433.733.634.733.833.633.633.333.735.133.634.335.334.633.533.533.635.835.935.8333333.834.333.833.833.834.533.733.733.533.835.133.433.333.63433.733.833.533.433.433.633.533.633.533.633.232.933.433.633.933.734.633.633.533.633.633.733.433.433.433.934.333.734.633.533.134.133.533.733.434.733.833.533.433.233.733.733.733.733.333.333.733.133.433.333.43433.233.635.23332.832.93332.933.23332.932.932.132.532.833333432.732.833.632.933.433.53232.232.13332.732.432.433.232.931.93231.933.132.13231.431.931.932.23231.832.831.731.531.731.831.930.831.131.432.232.831.531.331.331.331.330.831.130.830.830.831.430.731.3Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø34.4 (31.4-46.9)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø33.1 (30.7-35.9)

电池寿命

由于53Wh的电池容量保持不变,现实世界的电池寿命由于明亮的显示屏而变差。即使调整后的亮度为150cd/m²,功耗也更高,我们的WLAN测试只运行了8小时,而前代产品仍为11.5小时左右。在全亮度下,该设备甚至不能达到5小时。需要更长电池运行时间的用户肯定应该选择低功耗的1080p显示屏,EliteBook 830 G8也有这个功能。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 92)
8h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 92)
4h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 47min
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54.7 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
HP EliteBook 830 G7
i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
11%
-11%
51%
-10%
76%
16%
Reader / Idle
1167
2078
1315 (467 - 2925, n=38, last 2 years)
H.264
696
902
30%
667
-4%
703 (263 - 1152, n=47, last 2 years)
1%
WiFi v1.3
480
597
24%
454
-5%
629
31%
430
-10%
692
44%
583 (258 - 1223, n=115, last 2 years)
21%
Load
107
83
-22%
81
-24%
182
70%
221
107%
136 (65 - 255, n=61, last 2 years)
27%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳
+ 非常好的键盘
+ 现代端口,包括Thunderbolt 4
+ 广泛的安全功能
+ 良好的维护选项
+ 可选择使用LTE/5G
+ 安静和凉爽的操作
+ 三年保修

Cons

- 涡轮增压的使用有限
- SureView技术导致了图像质量的损失
- 没有PCIe 4.0或Wi-Fi 6E

结论 - EliteBook 830的保守更新

在审查。HP EliteBook 830 G8。测试设备由德国惠普公司提供。
在审查。HP EliteBook 830 G8。测试设备由德国惠普公司提供。

在去年的重大更新之后,惠普只对新的EliteBook 830 G8进行了仔细的更新。外壳一直保持不变,连同英特尔的新Tiger Lake 处理器,现在也有了Thunderbolt 4和USB 4。然而,新的处理器由于保守的配置而变得缓慢,它不能跟上AMD的最新处理器,特别是在多核应用中。

然而,主观的性能印象非常好,EliteBook在日常使用中以其安静和凉爽的操作说服了人们。同样,键盘也给人留下了非常好的印象,至少与新的ThinkPad X13第二代持平,后者现在得到了一个稍差的键盘。此外,830 G8是少数仍然易于维护的现代副笔记本之一,因为内存和通信模块,包括5G调制解调器,都不是焊接的。

与竞争对手不同,如ThinkPad X13第二代XPS 13 9310 ,或 Surface Laptop 4 ,惠普在这一代仍然坚持使用熟悉的16:9显示屏。我们的测试模型的显示屏非常明亮,超过1000cd/m²,但集成的SureView隐私过滤器损害了图像质量。即使禁用该功能,也只有一个非常狭窄的甜蜜点;即使小的偏差也会导致明显的对比度损失。此外,SureView只在较低的亮度范围内工作,因此很难适用于明亮的环境。此外,还有高耗电量和由此产生的较低的电池寿命。总而言之,在我们看来,SureView技术的缺点太大。因此,我们推荐EliteBook 830 G8,配备众所周知的低功率1080p显示屏。如果你真的需要一个隐私过滤器,我们建议使用一个额外的保护罩。

新款EliteBook 830 G8仍然是一款非常好的商务次笔记本,它首先以其安全功能、良好的输入设备和可选的LTE/5G连接而令人信服。然而,1,000 cd/m²的SureView显示屏并不值得推荐,因为它严重影响了图像质量。

此外,惠普在下一次更新中还有一些追赶工作要做,因为竞争对手已经回到了16:10的面板,尽管价格很高,但我们仍然没有得到PCIe 4.0 SSD和更快的Wi-Fi 6E模块等技术。需要更多移动处理能力的用户也应该看看配备AMD最新Ryzen 5000处理器的相同结构的EliteBook 835 G8。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

我们确切的测试设备配置在写作时似乎还没有。目前你可以在亚马逊上找到一个x360版本(可转换)。它配备了酷睿i7-1165G7处理器,16GB内存,512GB固态硬盘存储,以及触摸屏全高清IPS显示屏,售价2399美元。

另外,你也可以关注newegg亚马逊,例如,找到你需要的配置。

HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 - 08/25/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
85%