Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R7(Bristol Ridge)是AMD移动版Carrizo APU中最快的一款集成显卡。R7目前搭配于最高端处理器型号FX9830P中,核心频率900 MHz,有512个GCN着色单元。它的技术参数相比Carrizo架构的AMD Radeon R7相同,但频率高出至少100MHz。根据不同的散热系统和热设计功率(12-45瓦),它的性能会有不小的区别。它的性能还取决于内存设置(双通道DDR4可提供最佳性能)。

架构和特性

根据AMD的信息,Radeon R7包括基于第三代GCN架构(通常称为GCN 1.2或2.0)的8个核心。因此,它与Tonga架构桌面芯片十分相似,支持DirectX 12(FL 12_0)。此外,它的着色器支持Mantle,OpenGL和OpenCL的调用。它的处理器和显卡核心同时支持HSA 1.0。

相较于Kaveri架构(Kaveri R7与GCN 1.1),它有更高的内存利用率和新的色彩压缩格式,这将可提高5-7%的游戏性能。

改进后的Carrizo/Bristol Ridge架构视频解码器现在支持UVD 6,并可以硬件解码高达4K分辨率的HVEC / H.265视频。此外,VCE(Video Codec Engine)为H.264的转码进行了改进。对Bristol Ridge架构的特性分析信息可以在我们的详尽分析文章中找到。

性能

根据从12瓦到高达45瓦不等的热设计功率设置,它在游戏中的表现会有不小差异。总的来说,由于稍高的频率,它的表现比Carrizo Radeon R7稍高。您仍然可以使用Carrizo R7的基准测试成绩来作为它的性能参考。

功耗

取决于热设计功率配置,这块28纳米制程技术芯片功耗在12-45瓦之间。因此,它可用于轻薄笔记本以及中型设备或一体机中。

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 512 @ 900 MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) 384 @ 800 MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 800 MHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 600 MHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 128 @ 600 MHz64 Bit
CodenameBristol Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Transistor Count2410 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD FX-9830P4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD PRO A12-9830B4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD FX-9800P4 x 2700 MHz, 15 W? MHz758 MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? - ? MHz758 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.6 pt (6%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -74%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M230 0%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 1%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M340 1%
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 2%
Intel HD Graphics 520 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 338     avg: 365     median: 358 (2%)     max: 398 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 325     avg: 344     median: 347 (2%)     max: 359 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 34845     avg: 49654     median: 52245.5 (10%)     max: 59281 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 32062     avg: 34971     median: 32389 (4%)     max: 40461 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 3162     avg: 4026     median: 3942 (6%)     max: 5173 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 3477     avg: 5531     median: 5311 (3%)     max: 8107 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 667     avg: 938     median: 866 (3%)     max: 1230 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 750     avg: 1081     median: 1013 (2%)     max: 1466 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 44545     avg: 48082     median: 46007 (6%)     max: 53693 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 1737     avg: 1859     median: 1794 (5%)     max: 2130 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1820     avg: 1913     median: 1852 (4%)     max: 2210 points
...
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX -5%
AMD Radeon R7 M270 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X -1%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M 4%
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
3.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
13.9 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
19.5 fps (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
25.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
25.7 fps (7%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
23.8 fps (5%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
23.7 fps (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 175     avg: 179     median: 178.5 (2%)     max: 182 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 358     avg: 363     median: 362.5 (3%)     max: 367 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 1093     avg: 1346     median: 1450 (5%)     max: 1495 Points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
29.1 Watt (6%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
472 MHz (25%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
40.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.9 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
63.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
23.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10 15.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7 11.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18 20.6 21.6 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 12.4 13.2 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2 7 7.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
26.1  fps    + Compare