Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R7(Bristol Ridge)是AMD移动版Carrizo APU中最快的一款集成显卡。R7目前搭配于最高端处理器型号FX9830P中,核心频率900 MHz,有512个GCN着色单元。它的技术参数相比Carrizo架构的AMD Radeon R7相同,但频率高出至少100MHz。根据不同的散热系统和热设计功率(12-45瓦),它的性能会有不小的区别。它的性能还取决于内存设置(双通道DDR4可提供最佳性能)。

架构和特性

根据AMD的信息,Radeon R7包括基于第三代GCN架构(通常称为GCN 1.2或2.0)的8个核心。因此,它与Tonga架构桌面芯片十分相似,支持DirectX 12(FL 12_0)。此外,它的着色器支持Mantle,OpenGL和OpenCL的调用。它的处理器和显卡核心同时支持HSA 1.0。

相较于Kaveri架构(Kaveri R7与GCN 1.1),它有更高的内存利用率和新的色彩压缩格式,这将可提高5-7%的游戏性能。

改进后的Carrizo/Bristol Ridge架构视频解码器现在支持UVD 6,并可以硬件解码高达4K分辨率的HVEC / H.265视频。此外,VCE(Video Codec Engine)为H.264的转码进行了改进。对Bristol Ridge架构的特性分析信息可以在我们的详尽分析文章中找到。

性能

根据从12瓦到高达45瓦不等的热设计功率设置,它在游戏中的表现会有不小差异。总的来说,由于稍高的频率,它的表现比Carrizo Radeon R7稍高。您仍然可以使用Carrizo R7的基准测试成绩来作为它的性能参考。

功耗

取决于热设计功率配置,这块28纳米制程技术芯片功耗在12-45瓦之间。因此,它可用于轻薄笔记本以及中型设备或一体机中。

Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series

Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 512 @ 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) 384 @ 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 128 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
CodenameBristol Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), OpenGL 4.4
Power Consumption12-45 Watt
Transistor Count2.4 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPU in Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD FX-9830P4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD PRO A12-9830B4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD FX-9800P4 x 2700 MHz, 15 W? MHz758 MHz
min. - max.? MHz758 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -86%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M335
0.415 -10%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
0.42 -9%
0.4255 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 530
0.4259 -8%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
0.4323 -6%
0.4332 -6%
Intel HD Graphics 5600
0.4514 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
0.456 -1%
0.4574 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
0.4615
0.4628 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
0.4656 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
0.4662 1%
0.4765 3%
0.4833 5%
Intel HD Graphics 630
0.4861 5%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
0.4861 5%
0.4922 7%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
0.508 10%
...
21.1 4472%
max:
33.3 7116%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 338     avg: 364.7     median: 358 (1%)     max: 398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 325     avg: 343.7     median: 347 (1%)     max: 359 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -67%
...
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
274 -20%
281 -18%
Intel UHD Graphics 617
299 -13%
312 -9%
320 -7%
328.8 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
329 -4%
334 -3%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
336.2 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
343.7
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
344.7 0%
349 2%
Intel HD Graphics 630
368 7%
371.8 8%
377 10%
381 11%
389.1 13%
397 16%
409.5 19%
...
19434 5554%
max:
36485 10515%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 34845     avg: 49654     median: 52245.5 (6%)     max: 59281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 32062     avg: 34971     median: 32389 (4%)     max: 40461 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3162     avg: 4026     median: 3942 (4%)     max: 5173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 3477     avg: 5531     median: 5311 (1%)     max: 8107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 667     avg: 938     median: 866 (2%)     max: 1230 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 750     avg: 1081     median: 1013 (1%)     max: 1466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 44545     avg: 48082     median: 46007 (6%)     max: 53693 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1737     avg: 1859     median: 1794 (2%)     max: 2130 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1820     avg: 1913     median: 1852 (2%)     max: 2210 Points
171.8 -91%
...
1807 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
1819 -5%
1823 -5%
1831 -4%
1843 -4%
1846 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
1858 -3%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
1891 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
1903 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
1913
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
1916 0%
1926 1%
Qualcomm Adreno 685
1927 1%
1934 1%
Qualcomm Adreno 680
1936 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
1942 2%
1969 3%
1981 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
1985 4%
...
59943 3033%
max:
106023 5442%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5568 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
5111 Points (3%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
4937 -3%
4956 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
5033 -2%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
5035 -1%
5037 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
5058 -1%
5059 -1%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
5072 -1%
5081 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
5111
5142 1%
5150 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
5162 1%
Intel HD Graphics 530
5173 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
5209 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
5243 3%
5243 3%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
5324 4%
5366 5%
...
132443 2491%
max:
170928 3244%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5635     avg: 6645     median: 6644.5 (9%)     max: 7654 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
13.9 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
19.5 fps (4%)
0.6 -97%
...
17.67 -9%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
17.85 -8%
17.9 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 -8%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 -6%
18.7 -4%
18.8 -4%
19.03 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
19.4 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
19.5
AMD Radeon R7 M340
19.8 2%
19.95 2%
20.3 4%
20.4 5%
20.93 7%
21.2 9%
21.2 9%
22 13%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 13%
...
532 2628%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4680     avg: 4943     median: 4845 (3%)     max: 5403 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 18.06     avg: 20.1     median: 18.3 (6%)     max: 25.65 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.88     avg: 25.1     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 31.43 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
23.8 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
24.3 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
25.9 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
90 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 175     avg: 178.5     median: 178.5 (1%)     max: 182 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 358     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (1%)     max: 367 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1093     avg: 1346     median: 1450 (2%)     max: 1495 points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.1 Watt (4%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
472 MHz (19%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
40.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.9 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
63.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
23.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10 15.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7 11.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18 20.6 21.6 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 12.4 13.2 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2 7 7.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
26.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
47.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9 12 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3 11 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11.9 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.6 9.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
79  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
14.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
122.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
91.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
13 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10 12.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8 12.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.7 29 32.5 44.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.1 20.7 22.8 29.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.6 13.7 15.2 20.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 5.6 7.7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
43 45.4 46.2 46.8 60.9 62 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26 26.9 27.9 27.9 35.8 37.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.5 22.7 23 30.3 32.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8 7.8 10.7 10.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
54.9 74.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8 36.9 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.9 28.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7 12.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ark Survival Evolved13.1
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)13.8
Team Fortress 246.234
Dirt 440.9
Rocket League5733.218.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands11.95.3
For Honor20.67.1
Resident Evil 73412.2
Dishonored 2118.8
Titanfall 23430.310.5
Farming Simulator 1763.247.522
Battlefield 123.316.78.3
Civilization VI30.514.67.6
Deus Ex Mankind Divided1396.4
Mirror's Edge Catalyst16.911.7
Ashes of the Singularity8
The Division17.410.6
Far Cry Primal1598
XCOM 218.46.94.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider21137
Rainbow Six Siege47.120.814.7
Just Cause 31613.2
Star Wars Battlefront22.921.210.5
Anno 220526.114.46.7
World of Warships47.135.420.9
Metal Gear Solid V45.536.414.3
Dota 2 Reborn47.91613.9
Batman: Arkham Knight117
The Witcher 3138
Dirt Rally7927.315.2
GTA V41.538.110
Battlefield Hardline37.732.112.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition29.927.316.7
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare16
F1 2014624131
Alien: Isolation3220
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor21.714.7
Sims 4122.344.823.2
GRID: Autosport91.340.621.6
Thief141110
Battlefield 43423156
Batman: Arkham Origins482915
Company of Heroes 211116
Metro: Last Light1612
BioShock Infinite5130269
Tomb Raider65332512
Diablo III7054.645.541.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim281913
Batman: Arkham City362915
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
25
17
6
1
29
13

29
3

4
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 16:56:20

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.043s ... 0.044s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.045s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7442 +0.03s ... 0.074s

#11 got single benchmarks 7442 +0.022s ... 0.096s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.706s ... 0.802s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.802s

#15 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.82s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.82s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.04s ... 0.859s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +1.265s ... 2.125s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.129s

#20 return log +0s ... 2.129s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) graphics card

惠普 EliteBook 755 G4 (AMD PRO A12-9800B) 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 EliteBook 755 G4 (AMD PRO A12-9800B) 笔记本电脑简短评测

表现适当? 惠普EliteBook 系列电脑代表高需求客户的商务所需。您将在EliteBook 755 G4的评测中了解到,这一努力是否成功,它的表现是否可以胜任。...
AMD PRO A12-9800B | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
惠普 15-bw075ax (A12-9720P, Radeon R7) 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 15-bw075ax (A12-9720P, Radeon R7) 笔记本电脑简短评测

一波三折。 惠普15-bw07ax将AMD最新的高端APU,A12-9720P,带到了市场中。不过,这款处理器可能太新了——让它的系统十分不稳定。...
AMD A12-9720P | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | 15.60" | 1.9 kg
惠普 EliteBook 725 G4 (A12-9800B, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 EliteBook 725 G4 (A12-9800B, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Bristol Ridge商务本。 惠普的这台12.5寸Elitebook采用了AMD的APU处理器。惠普是目前仅剩不多仍然为商务设备采用AMD处理器的生产商之一。除了APU处理器,它还搭配了一块IPS屏幕,NVMe固态硬盘和LTE模组。遗憾的是,这台笔记本电脑的散热风扇略微吵闹。...
AMD PRO A12-9800B | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | 12.50" | 1.3 kg
惠普 15-ba077ng 笔记本电脑简短测评

惠普 15-ba077ng 笔记本电脑简短测评

低成本办公本。 普新推出家用办公笔记本电脑15-ba077ng。其笔记本电脑系统噪声低,温度低和固态驱动器快速。然而,该笔记本电脑还是有一些缺点。考虑到其约450欧元(约482)的价格,依然值得期待。...
AMD A12-9700P | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | 15.60" | 2 kg

Asus VivoBook S15 S510QR-BR011T: AMD FX-9800P, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S510QR-BR011T

Lenovo ThinkPad A275: AMD PRO A12-9800B, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad A275

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15ABR-80XS007XGE: AMD A12-9720P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15ABR-80XS007XGE

HP Pavilion 15-cd0000nu: AMD A12-9720P, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cd0000nu

HP Envy 15-bq015nd x360: AMD A12-9720P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-bq015nd x360

HP EliteBook 755 G4 Z2W11EA: AMD PRO A12-9800B, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 755 G4 Z2W11EA

HP EliteBook 745 G4 Z2W06EA: AMD PRO A12-9800B, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 745 G4 Z2W06EA

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ABR 80ST: AMD A12-9700P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ABR 80ST

Asus X555QG: AMD FX-9800P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus X555QG

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-04- 1)