华为MateBook X Pro 2022笔记本电脑评测。MacBook Air的竞争者以顶级IPS显示屏得分

Name: Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Brand: Huawei

最好的Windows超极本！？ MateBook X Pro 2022采用了新的外壳，有更大的显示屏，采用了英特尔最新的Alder Lake处理器，并具有广泛的功能。最终结果非常好，但是这款超极本也有一个昂贵的价格标签，约为2199欧元（约合2199美元）。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/10/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

MateBook X Pro历来是华为的旗舰超极本，2022年的新机型忠实于这种说法。花费2199欧元（约合2199美元），你就能得到一个新的机箱，配备3:2格式的14.2英寸IPS显示屏、英特尔Alder Lake P处理器、大量的USB-C端口以及雷电4支持和现代Wi-Fi 6E模块。用户还可以期待一个改进的键盘和一个具有额外功能的大型触摸板。

这足以争夺Windows超极本中的顶级地位吗？MateBook X Pro甚至对新的MacBook Air M2构成威胁吗？Apple MacBook Air M2？或者你应该选择 MateBook X Pro 2021它的酷睿i7-1165G7这款产品目前在华为的报价为1099欧元（约1100美元），非常实惠？

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 (MateBook X Pro Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1260P 12 x 1.5 - 4.7 GHz, 66 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2600 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-5200, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

14.20 inch 3:2, 3120 x 2080 pixel 264 PPI, capacitive, TMX1422, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB, 1024 GB

, 885 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 4 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.6 x 310 x 221

Battery

60 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6 speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W USB-C PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.268 kg, Power Supply: 240 g

Price

2199 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.3 %	09/2022	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	15.6 mm	14.20"	3120x2080
92 %	08/2022	Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU	1.2 kg	11.3 mm	13.60"	2560x1664
90.6 %	05/2022	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	15.25 mm	14.00"	3840x2400
90.1 %	07/2022	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M	1.1 kg	14.9 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
86.9 %	07/2022	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	15.3 mm	13.40"	3840x2400
87.8 %	03/2021	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	14.6 mm	13.90"	3000x2000

案例--华为让镁元素发挥作用

MateBook X Pro 2022有两个版本。根据规格表，我们的评测样本是高级版本，使用了新的 "软 "表面，结合了镁质底盘。除了深蓝色的变体（墨水蓝），还宣传了一个白色的模型，但这目前还无法获得。普通的太空灰版本在铝制外壳中提供了正常的光滑表面，而且重量也稍大一些。外壳是全新的；例如，在基本单元的顶部不再有抛光的边缘，就像旧的MateBook X Pro但该设备看起来仍然非常高质量，也能直接识别为MateBook。由于屏幕边缘较窄，这款笔记本看起来也非常现代。

当然，深蓝色让人联想到MacBook Air M2的新颜色变体。Apple MacBook Air M2，它的颜色更深一点。与MacBook Air相比，我们可以报告说，具有天鹅绒般柔软手感的表面，幸运的是对指纹不那么敏感，即使几天后我们也几乎看不到任何痕迹。整个外壳也给人以非常高质量和稳定的印象。基本单元只在键盘区域的上部中心有轻微的倾斜，但这在日常使用中并不令人感到困扰。显示屏的盖子也很稳定，没有产生吱吱作响的声音。我们只有在从后面有选择地施加大量压力的情况下才能够诱发图像伪影。屏幕铰链从根本上说调整得很好，而且用一只手打开盖子也没有问题。然而，屏幕的晃动是无法完全防止的。

与上一代相比，新的案例略有增长。前代产品，但显示屏更大，也是我们对比组中最大的显示屏之一。新的MateBook X Pro 2022的表面积也比新的 MacBook Air M2，但差别几乎不大。 Lenovos Yoga 9i 14敞篷车甚至略大。90瓦的电源适配器，包括USB-C电缆，重量为240克。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 华为终于将Thunderbolt 4带入设备中

雷电技术一直是旧款MateBook X Pro中缺少的功能。旧的MateBook X Pro.现在，新的2022型号现在提供两个USB-C端口，左侧支持Thunderbolt 4。在右侧，有两个额外的USB-C端口，也可用于充电。交付范围还包括一条用于USB-A的短转换线。

那些同时使用其他华为设备（如平板电脑、智能手机、显示器）的人将从所谓的超级设备功能中受益。与Apple ，这使用户能够轻松地在同步设备之间分享或传输内容，或将屏幕扩展到平板电脑等。在笔记本电脑上使用多达三个智能手机应用程序也是可能的。

左边：3.5毫米立体声，2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4（40Gbps，DisplayPort ALT模式，Power Delivery）。

右边：2个USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT模式, Power Delivery)

沟通

新的MateBook X Pro提供了英特尔最新的WLAN模块（AX211E），它支持6GHz网络（Wi-Fi 6E）以及蓝牙5.2。我们能够毫无问题地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络，而且传输率始终非常高，约为1.7GBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1639 (1603^min, 1605.03^P1 - 1687^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1613 (1478^min - 1688^max) MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=173)	1371 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1623 (1598^min, 1598^P1 - 1662^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=172)	1489 MBit/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1467 (1440^min - 1493^max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1662 (1600^min - 1681^max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1553 (1443^min - 1620^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=186)	1394 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	945 (924^min, 924.87^P1 - 968^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1558 (1401^min, 1409.7^P1 - 1609^max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (1365^min - 1583^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=186)	1243 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	865 (856^min, 856.29^P1 - 874^max) MBit/s

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1639 (1603-1687)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1623 (1598-1662)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头已经从键盘移到了屏幕上框，但只使用了一个720p的传感器，即使在良好的照明条件下也不能提供良好的图像质量。也没有机械快门或红外摄像头。

正如在 MateBook 16s。华为为网络摄像头提供了一些额外的AI功能。这些包括实用的功能，如虚拟背景（独立于软件），但也包括相当不必要的噱头，如美容模式。在MateBook 16s的1080p网络摄像头上，自动对焦的效果也更好一点。

ColorChecker Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022: 12.62 ∆E min: 3.89 - max: 19.73 ∆E

维护

底部有六颗Torx螺丝（T5），这些螺丝可以轻易拧开，但我们仍然无法卸下底板。我们怀疑在后部橡胶脚下有更多隐藏的螺丝，这在华为的宣传视频中得到了证实。然而，橡胶脚是非常紧的，华为还要求我们不要拆除它们，也不要打开机箱，因为害怕损坏。因此，用户没有可能进行维护工作，我们认为这是一个不必要的限制。

输入设备 - 1.5毫米键程和FreeTouch

键盘

与之相比旧型号，华为改进了键盘，将键位下降幅度增加到1.5毫米。打字的感觉是非常精确和愉快的，特别是对于这样一个紧凑的设备。打字的噪音一般，但除了空格键外，没有任何东西发出响声。总的来说，这是一个很好的键盘，用来写长篇文字没有任何问题。两段式白色背光有助于在黑暗环境中使用，但这必须手动激活。在PC管理器中，用户可以手动设置背光在不活动时自动关闭；15秒是默认设置。电源按钮位于键盘上方，不影响打字。它还包含指纹扫描仪，工作可靠。

触摸板

触摸板绝对是新款MateBook X Pro 2022的亮点之一。它不仅非常大，一直延伸到机箱的前缘（包括凹槽），而且还提供了很多额外的功能。华为将这些功能归为FreeTouch一词，其中涉及额外的手势。例如，你可以沿着两个垂直边缘滚动来改变屏幕亮度或音量，这也得到触觉网格效果的支持。你还可以通过沿上边缘滚动来浏览视频或音乐。其他手势也可以使用，如下图所示。

基本的指针控制也工作得很完美。滑动性能非常好，整个垫子可以清晰地向下点击。像Apple ，这一点被触觉反馈所证实，导致了非常均匀和令人愉快的安静的点击噪音。同时，该组件本身是完全稳固的。

显示器 - 90赫兹，IPS，无PWM

华为继续使用3:2的IPS显示屏，与前代产品一样。前辈，但将屏幕对角线从13.9英寸增加到14.2英寸。分辨率也是最小的，为3120x2080像素，导致264DPI的高像素密度。电容式触摸屏的主观画面印象非常好，因为色彩显得非常丰富，内容非常清晰。此外，该显示器提供了更高的刷新率，即90赫兹，这使得在视觉媒体播放过程中的画面印象更加流畅。然而，这必须首先在显示器设置中或通过Fn+R组合键手动激活。亮度可以通过传感器自动控制，色温也可以根据照明条件调整。

华为规定的亮度为500cd/m²，我们的评测样本很容易就超过了这个亮度，平均亮度接近590cd/m²。这使该面板比许多OLED屏幕更具优势，后者在正常SDR模式下通常只能达到400cd/m²。IPS面板的黑值（0.39）和对比度（>1,500:1）当然不如OLED，但性能仍然非常好。你只有在黑暗背景的最大亮度下才能真正看到光晕，这在实践中应该不会太经常发生。对于IPS面板来说，响应时间非常好，没有检测到PWM闪烁。

该面板还支持HDR内容，但这也必须先在Windows设置中激活。相应的HDR内容的播放工作正常，但主观上，HDR图像在OLED或迷你LED面板上看起来更好，这主要是由于更高的对比度。


563 cd/m²	568 cd/m²	557 cd/m²
599 cd/m²	603 cd/m²	571 cd/m²
612 cd/m²	613 cd/m²	586 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TMX1422 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 613 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 585.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 598 cd/m²
Contrast: 1546:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14.00	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Display		2%	6%	6%	-10%	-20%
Display P3 Coverage	94.6	98.4 4%	98.7 4%	99.8 5%	76.5 -19%	64.9 -31%
sRGB Coverage	99.5	99.9 0%	99.8 0%	100 1%	100 1%	94.4 -5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.5	87.6 1%	98.5 14%	97.8 13%	76 -12%	66.3 -23%
Response Times		-38%	87%	91%	-41%	-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	25.4 ?(11.7, 13.7)	32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1) -30%	2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6) 89%	2.1 ?(1.1, 1) 92%	38.9 ?(21.4, 17.5) -53%	37.6 ?(17.6, 20) -48%
Response Time Black / White *	17.1 ?(8.6, 8.51)	24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5) -46%	2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6) 84%	1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82) 90%	21.9 ?(11.9, 10) -28%	26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8) -54%
PWM Frequency			239.2 ?(50)	240.4 ?(53)
Screen		-8%	2867%	95%	-45%	-14%
Brightness middle	603	526 -13%	361 -40%	336 -44%	494 -18%	502 -17%
Brightness	586	486 -17%	362 -38%	338 -42%	474 -19%	474 -19%
Brightness Distribution	91	87 -4%	98 8%	99 9%	89 -2%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.39	0.38 3%	0.001 100%	0.02 95%	0.28 28%	0.33 15%
Contrast	1546	1384 -10%	361000 23251%	16800 987%	1764 14%	1521 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	1.3 -18%	2.8 -155%	1.8 -64%	3.1 -182%	1.35 -23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.2	2.7 -23%	5.8 -164%	3.8 -73%	4.2 -91%	3.67 -67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2	0.7 42%		1.8 -50%	1.5 -25%	1.2 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	2 -33%	1.9 -27%	0.9 40%	3.2 -113%	1.7 -13%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.16 ^102%	2.22 ^99%	2.41 ^91%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6549 ^99%	6858 ^95%	6181 ^105%	6580 ^99%	6189 ^105%	6440 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)						61.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						94.3
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-15% / -10%	987% / 1779%	64% / 76%	-32% / -37%	-28% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计测量了显示屏。读者应该注意，华为在出厂时提供了三种不同的配置文件。本地（P3）、sRGB和P3。在决定使用P3配置文件之前，我们测量了所有这三种配置文件。尽管原生配置文件也将P3作为目标色彩空间，但它显示出更高的偏差，而且主观上产生的色彩更丰富。另一方面，使用P3配置文件，颜色开箱就非常准确，再加上几乎完整的P3覆盖，用户可以进行图片/视频编辑，因为所有的值都已经低于DeltaE-2000的重要偏差3。

CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: P3, target color space P3)

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间sRGB）。

sRGB模式也非常准确，并真正将色彩空间限制在sRGB光谱上。与市场上几乎所有其他消费类笔记本相比，这是一个明显的优势。由于我们自己的校准工作只导致了显示值的下降，所以我们在此不提供相应的配置文件。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.6 ms rise
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.51 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
25.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.7 ms rise
25.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.7 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

光滑的触摸屏在户外自然会遇到反光的问题，但面板的反光性并不像最近评测的那样，例如 Honor 魔法书14.此外，屏幕的高亮度也有助于补偿可能的反射。即使在明亮的日子里，你也应该能够找到可以合理观看内容的位置。另一方面，阴天也不会造成任何问题。

性能 - Alder Lake-P，但没有PCIe 4.0

测试条件

像往常一样，预装的PC管理器提供两种性能模式，默认情况下，平衡模式被激活。性能模式可作为可选的替代方案，但仅在主电源运行时可用。我们在下面的表格中列出了处理器的TDP值。基准测试和测量是在性能模式下进行的，但你当然可以使用平衡模式，以便安心，并受益于更安静的风扇，特别是在日常使用中。

模式	CPU负载	最大风扇噪音
平衡	64瓦 -> 25瓦	33,4 dB(A)
性能	64瓦 -> 30瓦	40,6 -> 38,2 dB(A)

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1260P

芯片酷睿i7-1260P是英特尔桤木湖P系列中第二快的处理器，仅次于酷睿i7-1280P并提供一个由4个快速性能核心和8个效率核心组成的混合架构。如前所述，最大短期消耗为64瓦，这也是英特尔桤木湖-P芯片的最大极限。然而，这对于所有核心的最大时钟来说仍然是不够的。

几秒钟后，根据所选择的电源模式，消耗量平息在30或25瓦，然后稳定在这个水平。因此，MateBook X Pro不是恒定负载下最快的设备之一，但它在日常使用和短期基准测试中自然会受益于高功率限制和新性能核心的高单核性能。前代产品前辈。搭配其 Tiger Lake 酷睿i7-1165G7迅速节流到18瓦，并提供明显较低的多核性能。

在电池模式下，该处理器能够消耗最大40瓦，然后稳定在25瓦，这相当于主电源操作中的平衡模式水平。进一步的CPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P; Performance: Ø1444 (1398.01-1953.51)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P; Balanced: Ø1250 (1219.33-1644.94)

Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2: Ø994 (917.47-1212.01)

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1634 (1600.9-1805.05)

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36)

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	82.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	81.2 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	80.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	77.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	76.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1260P	75.4 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU ^-5! Apple M2	71 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	47.7 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	10735 Points +16%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10468 Points +13%
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)	10289 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	9743 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27)	9314 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	9235 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	8517 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	4043 (3994.31^min - 4043^max) Points -56%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1793 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1678 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25)	1674 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	1665 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)	1627 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1580 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1488 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1350 Points -19%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	4060 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	4048 Points +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)	3963 Points +5%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	3909 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	3757 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25)	3595 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	2306 Points -39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1559 Points -59%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	669 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	657 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	648 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25)	645 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)	610 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	564 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	522 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	380 Points -43%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	1954 (1398.01^min - 1953.51^max) Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	1645 (1219.33^min - 1644.94^max) Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1805 (1600.9^min - 1805.05^max) Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)	1757 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1742 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1677 (1481.98^min - 1677.36^max) Points -14%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1626 (983.94^min - 1625.95^max) Points -17%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29)	1553 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1212 (917^min - 1212^max) Points -38%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	635 (464.15^min - 634.96^max) Points -68%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	244 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	243 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	240 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	237 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)	237 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27)	232 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	223 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	209 Points -14%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	747 Seconds * -128%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	616.7 Seconds * -88%
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)	386 Seconds * -18%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26)	366 Seconds * -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	328 Seconds *
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	319 Seconds * +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	310 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	300 Seconds * +9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	47500 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	45227 MIPS +6%
Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years)	44459 MIPS +4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	43056 MIPS +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	42711 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25)	38707 MIPS -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	19404 MIPS -55%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	5431 MIPS +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	5347 MIPS
Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)	5328 MIPS 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	5325 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25)	5284 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	5204 MIPS -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5140 MIPS -4%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	10321 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	10160 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	9817 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)	9084 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	8991 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25)	8763 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7613 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5186 Points -49%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1925 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1764 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	1748 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1723 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)	1701 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25)	1693 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1514 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1454 Points -17%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	12.6 fps +7%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	12.4 fps +5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years)	11.9 fps +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	11.8 fps 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	11.8 fps
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26)	10.8 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.23 fps -56%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	54.1 s * -35%
Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years)	52.6 s * -31%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25)	48.4 s * -20%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	47.9 s * -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	44.8 s * -11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	44.6 s * -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	40.2 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.605 sec * -25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	0.529 sec * -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years)	0.52 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25)	0.5 sec * -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	0.4993 sec * -3%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	0.4928 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P	0.4857 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1645 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

100.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

244 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	95.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	82.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1260P	63 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62.4 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62.3 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	11187 KRay/s +116%
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years)	10054 KRay/s +94%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26)	6522 KRay/s +26%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5483 KRay/s +6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5393 KRay/s +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5354 KRay/s +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5183 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	71474 Points +193%
Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years)	52488 Points +115%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26)	31427 Points +29%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	25348 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24374 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	21811 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	21672 Points -11%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	2455 MB/s +40%
Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years)	2361 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2076 MB/s +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26)	1827 MB/s +4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1795 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1756 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1525 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	82608 Points +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years)	79878 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	76165 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	75217 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26)	72878 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50292 Points -34%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42571 Points -44%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	10724 Points +80%
Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years)	7617 Points +28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5968 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5943 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26)	5770 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5524 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3613 Points -39%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	39378 Points +178%
Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years)	27533 Points +94%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26)	16631 Points +17%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14790 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14163 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13376 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11520 Points -19%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	101595 MB/s +71%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59402 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)	53217 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52090 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26)	45075 MB/s -24%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38204 MB/s -36%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20435 MB/s -66%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years)	666 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	660 MB/s +4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	653 MB/s +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	633 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	630 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26)	607 MB/s -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	272 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	5825 KRay/s +101%
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years)	5239 KRay/s +81%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26)	3577 KRay/s +24%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3136 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2981 KRay/s +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2891 KRay/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2831 KRay/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42971 MPixel/s +17%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39591 MPixel/s +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	36682 MPixel/s
Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years)	35760 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26)	30959 MPixel/s -16%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	25037 MPixel/s -32%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	16079 MPixel/s -56%

系统性能

新MateBook X Pro的主观性能印象非常好，并被良好的基准测试结果所证实。然而，这里还应该指出，在实践中，最新设备之间几乎没有差异。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6346 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	6068 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)	5879 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5738 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5558 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17)	5498 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4870 Points -20%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10826 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	10720 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10709 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10404 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17)	10341 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)	10247 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	10184 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8984 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	8629 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)	7857 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7030 Points -19%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17)	6950 Points -19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6900 Points -20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6719 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7208 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)	6923 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6739 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	6556 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6492 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17)	6294 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4583 Points -30%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1811 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1685 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1667 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16)	1638 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)	1553 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1496 Points -17%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points -18%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1755 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1604 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16)	1592 Points -9%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1575 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)	1507 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1476 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1377 Points -22%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1869 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1861 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1821 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1819 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16)	1751 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)	1690 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1554 Points -17%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1807 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1547 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16)	1471 Points -19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1418 Points -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)	1329 Points -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1293 Points -28%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1065 Points -41%

PCMark 10 Score		6068 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68214 MB/s +14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64442 MB/s +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years)	61239 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59823 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25)	54361 MB/s -9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	47701 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67059 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64497 MB/s -4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64230 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years)	57245 MB/s -15%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25)	56385 MB/s -16%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	39402 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66770 MB/s +7%
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years)	64603 MB/s +4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62767 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62336 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25)	53353 MB/s -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	48723 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	120.1 ns * -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	114.1 ns *
Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years)	104 ns * +9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	90.5 ns * +21%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21)	78.7 ns * +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载），我们的评测设备在目前的BIOS版本下显示出轻微的限制，因此只是有条件地适合使用实时音频应用程序。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1225 μs * -30%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	959.5 μs * -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	943.3 μs *
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	732.2 μs * +22%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	588.9 μs * +38%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

华为使用PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘，存储容量为1TB，其中约885GB在第一次启动后仍然可用。然而，与所有其他华为笔记本电脑一样，固态硬盘在出厂前被分区，系统驱动器非常小，约120GB。减去Windows占用的空间后，只剩下不到70GB，这可能很快导致容量问题。剩余的814GB可以在D盘使用。

速度方面也有限制。基本上，3GB/s左右的传输率是完全够用的（即使人们应该合理地期望在这个价格上有更高的传输率的PCIe 4.0硬盘），但是该硬盘在持续负载下有温度问题（根据WiNFO的数据为74℃），所以性能会定期崩溃。看一下散热情况就会发现，该硬盘直接位于CPU散热器上。另一方面，这些影响在日常使用中可以忽略不计，我们在正常的测试程序中没有发现任何限制。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2942.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2711.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 797.84 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 689.73 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.14 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 231.14 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1490.7 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1337.01 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	93.8 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	68.9 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	65 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	62.9 pt
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	62.9 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	59.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	54.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4012 (3903.22^min - 4012.48^max) MB/s +45%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3871 (3794.8^min - 3871.36^max) MB/s +40%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3382 (3242.21^min - 3381.81^max) MB/s +22%
Average of class Subnotebook (452 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	2773 (1245.11^min - 2772.97^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	2773 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1958 (1947.92^min - 1957.69^max) MB/s -29%
seq write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4146 (4097.82^min - 4146.07^max) MB/s +69%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3188 (3158.91^min - 3187.67^max) MB/s +30%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3121 (2981.01^min - 3120.61^max) MB/s +27%
Average of class Subnotebook (153.3 - 5344, n=58, last 2 years)	2808 MB/s +15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	2451 (2412.98^min - 2451.49^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	2451 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2290 (2283.84^min - 2290.3^max) MB/s -7%
seq q8 t1 read
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6905 (5743.52^min - 6905.08^max) MB/s +106%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6654 (5007.16^min - 6653.54^max) MB/s +98%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6082 (5108.93^min - 6082.16^max) MB/s +81%
Average of class Subnotebook (558 - 7134, n=58, last 2 years)	4958 MB/s +48%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	3432 (3277.58^min - 3432.46^max) MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	3357 (3051.54^min - 3357.12^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	3357 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5156 (5079.42^min - 5156.48^max) MB/s +80%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4971 (4954.47^min - 4971.21^max) MB/s +74%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4938 (4919.31^min - 4937.74^max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Subnotebook (60 - 6751, n=58, last 2 years)	3775 MB/s +32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2955 (2904.97^min - 2955.31^max) MB/s +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	2865 (1154.69^min - 2864.64^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	2865 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	86.2 (82.58^min - 86.23^max) MB/s +37%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.7 (72.52^min - 75.72^max) MB/s +20%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	67.3 (66.05^min - 67.28^max) MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	62.9 (62.62^min - 62.94^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	62.9 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (12.6 - 88.6, n=58, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	53.8 (53.67^min - 53.82^max) MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	269 (258.65^min - 268.78^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	269 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	215 (210.55^min - 214.96^max) MB/s -20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	200 (199.55^min - 200.17^max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 360, n=58, last 2 years)	154.8 MB/s -42%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	149.4 (148.22^min - 149.37^max) MB/s -44%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	49.9 (49.37^min - 49.91^max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3345 (3332.76^min - 3344.97^max) MB/s +154%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1829 (1554.44^min - 1829.01^max) MB/s +39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1319 (4.13^min - 1318.78^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1319 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1227 (1201.13^min - 1227.26^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (283 - 4286, n=58, last 2 years)	1215 MB/s -8%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	544 (518.47^min - 543.87^max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2382 (1954.07^min - 2382.29^max) MB/s +57%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2031 (1248.1^min - 2031.17^max) MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1513 (637.67^min - 1513.33^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1513 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (157 - 4189, n=58, last 2 years)	869 MB/s -43%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	506 (496.78^min - 506.11^max) MB/s -67%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	377 (248.26^min - 377.39^max) MB/s -75%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8167 Points +93%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5566 Points +31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5392 Points +27%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4522 Points +7%
Average of class Subnotebook (707 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)	4437 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	4237 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	4237 Points 0%
Score Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3045 Points +90%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2108 Points +32%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1705 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1600 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1600 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (253 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)	1464 Points -8%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1267 Points -21%
Score Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3626 Points +99%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3101 Points +70%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2720 Points +49%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3972, n=56, last 2 years)	2285 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2219 Points +22%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1826 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1826 Points 0%
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5186 MB/s +86%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4664 MB/s +67%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4642 MB/s +66%
Average of class Subnotebook (508 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)	3827 MB/s +37%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2794 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	2790 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	2790 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3838 MB/s +59%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	2421 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	2421 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2385 MB/s -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (386 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)	2355 MB/s -3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2179 MB/s -10%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 MB/s -20%
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.81 MB/s +35%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.28 MB/s +23%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	63.64 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	60.7 MB/s +2%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	59.7 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	59.69 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (14.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)	59.4 MB/s 0%
4K Write
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	237 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	236.5 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	192.81 MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	189.21 MB/s -20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	180.8 MB/s -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (65.5 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)	173.2 MB/s -27%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	151.15 MB/s -36%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2445.65 MB/s +94%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1768 MB/s +40%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1261 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1260.92 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1174.58 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (187.3 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)	1022 MB/s -19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	729.57 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3049.61 MB/s +126%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2732.34 MB/s +103%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2338.23 MB/s +74%
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 3410, n=56, last 2 years)	1873 MB/s +39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1800 MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	1347.48 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	1347 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Average of class Subnotebook (0.021 - 0.257, n=56, last 2 years)	0.06214 ms * -196%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	0.037 ms * -76%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.023 ms * -10%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.023 ms * -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms * -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	0.021 ms *
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	0.021 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Average of class Subnotebook (0.016 - 0.523, n=56, last 2 years)	0.07618 ms * -376%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	0.073 ms * -356%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.027 ms * -69%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * -31%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * -31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	0.016 ms *
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB ()	0.016 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022: Ø2368 (145.12-2745.38)

图形卡

关于显卡，我们可以说得很简单，因为著名的Iris Xe Graphics G7iGPU是英特尔在这里使用的较快版本，有96个EUs。这为正常的日常使用提供了足够的性能，也可以毫无问题地处理高分辨率的视频。在合成基准测试中，它得益于工作内存的双通道配置，并达到了预期水平，尽管这明显低于 Radeon 680M iGPU和Apple M2 GPU (有8个或 10个核心与前代产品（采用相同的iGPU）相比，图形性能仅有小幅提高。

因此，MateBook X Pro仅部分适用于游戏，即使在简单的游戏中，用户也经常被限制在低或中等的细节上。至少在较长的游戏过程中性能保持稳定，正如我们的Witcher 3 循环所证明的那样。

在电池电量方面，性能有些受限，你应该预期会有~13%的亏损。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU ^-3! Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	100 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	84.1 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry ^-3! Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	83.6 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	82.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	74.3 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	70.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	69.7 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	69.4 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	62.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	9095 Points +33%
Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)	8227 Points +20%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	6956 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	6954 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	6852 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7471, n=194)	6345 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6294 Points -8%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	6683 Points +23%
Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)	6026 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5479 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5427 Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5421 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5169 Points -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6143, n=207)	4905 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	2287 Points +31%
Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years)	2027 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	1784 Points +3%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	1758 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	1740 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=204)	1494 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1430 Points -18%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6824 Points +76%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	5689 Points +46%
Average of class Subnotebook (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)	5503 Points +42%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4081 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	3888 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3793 Points -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2054 - 4304, n=21)	3545 Points -9%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6772 Points +75%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	5673 Points +46%
Average of class Subnotebook (2001 - 9404, n=13, last 2 years)	4789 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4103 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4057 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	3876 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3827 Points -1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1978 - 4255, n=19)	3450 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		7512 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21739 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5021 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1964 points
Help

... in comparison

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.2 (12-16)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	115.4	102.4	23.9	10.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	95	60	33	14.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	113	87.5	65.3	59.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	44.7	25.1	18.5		13
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	32.8	31.1	29.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	56	30	28	26	17
Strange Brigade (2018)	91.6	43.9	35.3	28.6
F1 2021 (2021)	102.9	49.8	39.5	27.8
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	96	45	33	31	25

排放--拥有出色扬声器的MateBook

噪声

从根本上说，带有两个风扇和一个蒸汽室的冷却系统提供了良好的被动冷却，因为在负载情况下至少需要20秒才能使风扇启动。在风扇噪音方面，两种性能概况之间存在明显的差异，尽管这里的消耗差异只有5瓦。在压力测试中测得的40.6 dB(A)的最大水平，在功耗稳定在30瓦时很快就降到了38.2 dB(A)。风扇的噪音绝不是令人不快或高亢的，在平衡模式下只达到最大的33.4 dB(A)，这就大大地降低了噪音。因此，我们建议在日常使用中使用平衡模式。

没有发现其他电子噪音，如线圈啸叫。

模式	3DMark 06	Witcher 3 Ultra	压力测试
平衡	31.5 dB(A)	31.5 dB(A)	33.4 dB(A)
性能	33,8 dB(A)	35,4 dB(A)	40,6 -> 38,2 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		23.5 / 23.5 / 25.9 dB(A)
Load		33.8 / 40.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A)

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Noise		-7%	-2%	-10%	1%
off / environment *	23.5	24.1 -3%	24 -2%	24.4 -4%	25.4 -8%
Idle Minimum *	23.5	24.1 -3%	24 -2%	24.4 -4%	25.6 -9%
Idle Average *	23.5	24.1 -3%	24 -2%	24.4 -4%	25.6 -9%
Idle Maximum *	25.9	30 -16%	24 7%	25.5 2%	25.6 1%
Load Average *	33.8	39.4 -17%	33.1 2%	40.4 -20%	28.7 15%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35.4	39.4 -11%	40.2 -14%	45.5 -29%	32 10%
Load Maximum *	40.6	39.4 3%	41.7 -3%	45.5 -12%	38.2 6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

华为将表面温度控制得很好。在空闲和轻度任务时，机箱确实比平时热了几度，但这并不构成问题。在负载情况下，你可以在红外图像中清楚地看到冷却系统和风扇的位置，因为这些区域（尤其是中间）会变热。键盘的上侧甚至比下侧更热一些，这在打字时也很明显，但这并不证明是限制性的。另一方面，即使在压力测试中，掌托仍然保持令人愉快的凉爽。在底部的最高温度为42℃时，你可以毫不犹豫地将MateBook X Pro放在腿上，即使在负载情况下。

在压力测试中，我们观察到与纯CPU负载相同的行为。在64瓦的短暂消耗高峰之后，消耗量迅速稳定在30瓦。在测试过程中，CPU/iGPU的时钟有轻微的变化，但总体上一切都保持相当稳定。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	43.1 °C	42.8 °C
39.2 °C	43.1 °C	41.1 °C
28.4 °C	28.2 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 37.3 °C


42 °C	41.6 °C	41.7 °C
38.2 °C	40 °C	38.8 °C
29.1 °C	30.5 °C	29.5 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 36.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


28.7 °C	29.4 °C	28.6 °C
26.9 °C	28.3 °C	27 °C
24.9 °C	24.5 °C	24.9 °C

Maximum: 29.4 °C
Average: 27 °C


29.4 °C	28.9 °C	28.6 °C
26.7 °C	27.8 °C	27.5 °C
25.5 °C	25.7 °C	25.8 °C

Maximum: 29.4 °C
Average: 27.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.6 °C	42 °C	41.7 °C
38.9 °C	42.6 °C	40.7 °C
26.6 °C	26.8 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 36.2 °C


40.8 °C	40.2 °C	40.4 °C
37 °C	38.6 °C	37.7 °C
27.9 °C	29.2 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 35.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49.7 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		5%	-6%	-7%	-2%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.1	44.7 -4%	47.5 -10%	47.9 -11%	41.1 5%	42.2 2%
Maximum Bottom *	42	44.6 -6%	52.2 -24%	56.1 -34%	48.8 -16%	40.4 4%
Idle Upper Side *	29.4	25.1 15%	27.1 8%	26.8 9%	28 5%	31.2 -6%
Idle Bottom *	29.4	25.3 14%	28.5 3%	27.3 7%	29.3 -0%	32.2 -10%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

MateBook X Pro提供了一个带有6个扬声器的音响系统，其性能非常好。声音非常宽广，有力，非常响亮。此外，华为的声音软件提供了一些改进，包括对扬声器、连接的耳机和麦克风的改进。除了我们的主观印象外，测试结果也非常好，MateBook X Pro也正好领先于目前的MacBook Air M2而只是非常轻微地落后于 MacBook Pro 14，后者提供的低音更多一点。在大多数情况下，外部扬声器是没有必要的。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 明亮的显示屏会消耗电池寿命

消耗功率

新的MateBook X Pro不是一个特别经济的笔记本，这主要是由于非常明亮，而且也是大的显示屏。我们在空闲模式下测得的功率高达14瓦。在负载情况下，由于处理器的高功率限制，功耗跃升至91瓦，但随后平缓下来，略低于56瓦。我们还用一个更强的电源检查了90瓦的电源是否限制了笔记本电脑的最大功耗，但情况并非如此。总的来说，90瓦的电源是足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.45 / 1.1 Watt
Idle	6.5 / 13.7 / 14.4 Watt
Load	64.6 / 90.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20	Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 14.00	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		49%	9%	32%	14%	28%	28%	30%
Idle Minimum *	6.5	1.9 71%	7.1 -9%	4.8 26%	7 -8%	6.7 -3%	5.26 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=185) 19%	4.9 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=61, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average *	13.7	9.6 30%	10 27%	8.7 36%	11 20%	10 27%	8.46 ?(3.8 - 63, n=185) 38%	8.36 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=61, last 2 years) 39%
Idle Maximum *	14.4	9.7 33%	10.8 25%	10.1 30%	11.4 21%	10.3 28%	10.7 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=185) 26%	10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=61, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	64.6	32.4 50%	64 1%	45.6 29%	59.7 8%	35.7 45%	44.8 ?(12.5 - 77.5, n=185) 31%	45.9 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=60, last 2 years) 29%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57.2	30.8 46%	47.7 17%	42.4 26%	49.4 14%	32.7 43%
Load Maximum *	90.9	35.7 61%	97 -7%	49.5 46%	63 31%	67.6 26%	66.8 ?(30.1 - 118, n=185) 27%	66 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=61, last 2 years) 27%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø57.2 (54.7-73.5)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.8 (55.6-90.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø53.1 (47.5-91)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.5 (57.8-91)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (36.5-53.8)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.9 (44.4-91)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.4 (46.6-70.7)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.7 (47.2-62.2)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9 (7.57-10.9)

电池寿命

60Wh的电池和高消耗率的组合不允许特别长的电池运行时间。显示屏是个耗电大户，即使在150cd/m²的亮度下（相当于我们评测设备最大亮度的56%），我们在视频和WLAN测试中都只用了大约7.5小时。WLAN测试甚至在全屏亮度下不到5小时就停止了。竞争对手只是提供了更多的耐力；MateBook X Pro不太可能在没有电源插座的情况下工作一整天。

至少该设备的充电速度相对较快，因为完全充电（在笔记本电脑打开的情况下）需要大约80分钟，而在34分钟后可以达到50%，52分钟后达到80%。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 104)		7h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 104)		4h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 40min

	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		102%	27%	56%	4%	61%	43%
H.264	455	946 108%	758 67%	912 100%	657 44%		794 ?(426 - 1153, n=30, last 2 years) 75%
WiFi v1.3	451	884 96%	517 15%	550 22%	414 -8%	629 39%	629 ?(303 - 1144, n=63, last 2 years) 39%
Load	100		98 -2%	146 46%	76 -24%	182 82%	115.4 ?(61 - 197, n=47, last 2 years) 15%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 精彩的IPS显示屏

+ 良好的输入设备和实用的触摸板

+ 优秀的扬声器

+ 雷电4和Wi-Fi 6E

+ 非常好的系统性能

+ 有用的网络摄像头功能

Cons

- 没有为终端用户提供维护选项

- 可怜的720P网络摄像头

- SSD性能不稳定

- 电池运行时间相对较短

- 不需要的SSD分区

结论。MateBook X Pro只有几个弱点

华为的目标是通过其2022年的新MateBook X Pro成为超极本中的佼佼者，这也反映在2199欧元的自信价格上。在结束审查过程时，我们的印象是非常积极的。对于一个高昂的价格，用户得到了一个整体上非常微调的包，只有几个弱点。720p的摄像头当然是其中之一，但至少它已经被几个新的软件功能所加强。缺乏维护选项和难以接触到组件也是批评的要点。最后，我们对起伏不定的固态硬盘性能和相对较短的电池运行时间不是很满意。

作为回报，你得到了一个紧凑而高质量的14.2英寸设备，它有一个非常好的IPS显示屏，提供近600cd/m²的亮度水平。此外，色彩准确性非常好，你可以通过软件在P3和sRGB色彩空间之间切换，这一点没有多少工作站能够做到。没有PWM，3:2的外形尺寸很适合工作。

桤木湖的酷睿i7-1260P和合理的功率水平可以实现出色的系统性能，但在纯粹的CPU性能方面还有更快的竞争对手。在实践中，平衡模式是完全足够的，特别是由于你受益于更安静的风扇；在平衡模式下最大约33 dB（A），MateBook X Pro是最安静的模型之一。只有被动冷却的 MacBook Air M2在这里有优势。华为在固态硬盘方面浪费了一些潜力，因为没有PCIe 4.0驱动器，而且在散热器上的定位导致一段时间后性能下降。尽管如此，对于日常生活中的绝大多数用户来说，这不应该是一个问题。

高品质的外壳，非常好的系统性能，出色的扬声器和顶级显示屏。新的华为MateBook X Pro 2022整体上是一个非常好的包装。如果你能忍受缺乏维护选项和平庸的电池运行时间，你将拥有最好的Windows超极本，也是目前Apple's MacBook Air的最佳替代品。

华为已经升级了设备，现在首次提供了两个成熟的Thunderbolt 4端口。还有一个来自英特尔的现代Wi-Fi 6E模块，其他华为设备（如智能手机或平板电脑）的所有者可以对单个设备之间的高效联网感到高兴。华为还升级了输入设备。键盘现在提供了更多的键程，因此打字更舒适，但大型触摸板也通过额外的手势提供了真正的附加值。扬声器也没有被放过，因为我们的评测样品可以轻松地与目前的MacBook Air M2竞争。

说到 MacBook Air M2。它无疑是MateBook X Pro的最大对手之一。它的M2芯片的效率要高得多，而且由于被动冷却，总是很安静。然而，MacBook Air M2确实有它的缺点，特别是在功能方面，因为你必须没有快速的Wi-Fi 6E（或160MHz的Wi-Fi 6）以及Thunderbolt 4。笔记本电脑联想瑜伽9i 14也是一个非常好的设备，如果你能利用可转换的格式，也是一个有趣的选择。华硕华硕ZenBook S 13另一方面，它的13.3英寸显示屏更加紧凑，但由于采用了AMD处理器，特别是快速的iGPU，它的性能更强。戴尔戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320也以其紧凑的外壳给人留下深刻印象，但总体上没有提供如此好的包装。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

新发布的MateBook X Pro 2022还没有到达全球所有地区，所以供应可能比较稀少。建议用户直接通过华为的网上商店查询。.首先选择你的位置，然后在搜索栏中输入MateBook X Pro 2022。

例如，我们发现，该设备已经在France(2199.99欧元),英国(1799.99英镑),罗马尼亚(9.999,00 Lei),新加坡(2,798.00美元),南非(35,999.00兰特),沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋长国.

这份清单并不详尽。价格截止到2022年9月9日，可能会有变化。

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 - 2022-09-08 09/08/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

66 / 75 → 88%

Weight

72 / 20-75 → 94%

Battery

75%

Display

93%

Games Performance

68 / 78 → 87%

Application Performance

88 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

89%

Noise

94%

Audio

92 / 91 → 100%

Camera

31 / 85 → 36%

Average

80%

90%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MateBook X Pro 2022笔记本电脑评测。MacBook Air的竞争者以顶级IPS显示屏得分

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-09-10 (Update: 2022-09-10)

华为MateBook X Pro 2022笔记本电脑评测。MacBook Air的竞争者以顶级IPS显示屏得分

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例--华为让镁元素发挥作用

尺寸比较

设备 - 华为终于将Thunderbolt 4带入设备中

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 1.5毫米键程和FreeTouch

键盘

触摸板

显示器 - 90赫兹，IPS，无PWM

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Alder Lake-P，但没有PCIe 4.0

测试条件

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1260P

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放--拥有出色扬声器的MateBook

噪声

温度

发言人

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 audio analysis

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis

能源管理 - 明亮的显示屏会消耗电池寿命

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论。MateBook X Pro只有几个弱点

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare