Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada Generation 不会与 A3000, P3000RTX 3000 图灵一代这是一款用于笔记本电脑的高端专业显卡,拥有 4608 个 CUDA 内核和 8GB GDDR6 VRAM(可选 ECC)。可以说,这是一款 GeForce RTX 4070(笔记本电脑)因此,该显卡的速度足以在 1440p 高画质设置下运行许多游戏。RTX 3000 诞生于 2023 年,采用台积电的 5 纳米工艺和 Nvidia 的 Ada Lovelace 架构,实现了高于平均水平的性能和适中的功耗。

Quadro 系列显卡的 BIOS 和驱动程序与GeForce 显卡大不相同,主要针对专业用途而非游戏。产品设计、大规模计算、模拟、数据挖掘、全天候运行和认证驱动程序--如果这些听起来耳熟能详,那么 Quadro 显卡一定会让你满意。

架构与功能

与采用安培架构的旧显卡相比,Ada Lovelace 带来了一系列改进。这不仅仅是更好的制造工艺和更多的 CUDA 内核(从 10,752 个内核增加到 16,384 个内核),还有大量的底层改进,包括更大的二级缓存、通过简化透明和非透明评估实现的优化光线追踪程序以及其他变化。当然,这些显卡可以编码和解码一些最广泛使用的视频编解码器,包括 AVC、HEVC 和 AV1;它们还支持大量 Nvidia 技术,包括 Optimus 和 DLSS 3。

RTX 3000 拥有 36 个第三代 RT 内核、144 个第四代 Tensor 内核和 4608 个 CUDA 内核,只要我们不考虑时钟速度的差异,它比 RTX 3500 Ada 代差约 11%。(3500 还拥有更多的 VRAM,以供参考)。RTX 3000 配备 8 GB 128 位宽 ECC GDDR6 内存,吞吐量约为 256 GB/s。纠错电路的出现证明该图形适配器确实是针对专业用户的。

与基于安培的显卡一样,RTX 3000 也使用 PCI-Express 4 协议。支持 8K SUHD 显示器,不过,DP 1.4a 视频输出有可能成为系统的瓶颈。

性能

评测过 戴尔Precision 5480及其 50 W RTX 3000 Ada Generation(2023 年 9 月),我们可以坚定地说,这款显卡与 RTX 4060(笔记本电脑)RTX 4050(笔记本电脑)和 RTX 4050(笔记本电脑)同级,尽管它们与 RTX 4070(笔记本电脑).在 Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA 测试中仅用 48 秒,3DMark 11 GPU 性能得分不到 30,000 分,这些成绩都不值得一提。该 GPU 的游戏天赋也并不出众,尽管它确实足以胜任 1080p 游戏。

Nvidia 的营销材料中提到了 20 TFLOPS 的性能,与 RTX 2000 Ada Generation 的 14.5 TFLOPS 相比有了非常明显的提升。 RTX 2000 Ada 代所提供的 14.5 TFLOPS 性能有了非常明显的提升。您的使用情况可能会有所不同,这取决于您笔记本电脑的散热解决方案有多好,以及显卡的 TGP 功耗目标有多高。100 W 的 RTX 3000 Ada 可能会接近 RTX 4070(笔记本电脑);我们将尽我们所能,尽快测试更多围绕这款专业图形适配器打造的笔记本电脑。

还有一点值得一提,启用 ECC VRAM 模式似乎会将应用程序和游戏可用的显存减少多达一千兆字节。

功耗

Nvidia 不再将笔记本显卡分为 Max-Q 和非 Max-Q 两种型号。取而代之的是,笔记本电脑制造商可以根据自己的需要自由设置 TGP,有时这个范围会大得惊人。RTX 3000 的情况尤其如此,推荐的最低值仅为 35 W,而最高值则高出 300% 达到 140 W(很可能包括动态升压)。围绕 RTX 3000 构建的最慢系统也能轻松达到最快系统的一半。这就是我们在采用最新GeForce RTX 显卡的消费级笔记本电脑上看到的差距。

最后但并非最不重要的一点是,RTX 3000 所采用的改进型 5 纳米工艺(台积电 4N)可在 2023 年中期实现非常出色的能效。

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
CacheL2: 32 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorQuadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8254     avg: 8533     median: 8532.5 (25%)     max: 8811 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7959     avg: 8155     median: 8155 (22%)     max: 8351 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -99%
...
7129 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
7284 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
7432 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7445 -9%
7651 -6%
7763 -5%
7864 -4%
7903 -3%
8057 -1%
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
8155
8210 1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8238 1%
8316 2%
8334 2%
8700 7%
8798 8%
8989 10%
9033 11%
9164 12%
...
19434 138%
max:
36485 347%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
45774 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
82612 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18368     avg: 18608     median: 18607.5 (33%)     max: 18847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 20233     avg: 20571     median: 20570.5 (23%)     max: 20908 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 25317     avg: 26200     median: 26200 (36%)     max: 27083 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 28283     avg: 28847     median: 28847 (25%)     max: 29411 Points
171.8 -99%
...
25775 -11%
25897 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
26602 -8%
26816 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27104 -6%
27852 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28106 -3%
28539 -1%
28692 -1%
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
28847
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29416 2%
29663 3%
30077 4%
31142 8%
32331 12%
32662 13%
32846 14%
33169 15%
33497 16%
...
59943 108%
max:
106023 268%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 159.9     avg: 171.9     median: 171.9 (43%)     max: 183.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 163.39     avg: 169.1     median: 169.1 (25%)     max: 174.85 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 88.34     avg: 90.2     median: 90.2 (20%)     max: 91.96 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 133.1     avg: 138     median: 138 (38%)     max: 142.99 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 123.21     avg: 136.8     median: 136.8 (55%)     max: 150.32 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 174.33     avg: 186.4     median: 186.4 (31%)     max: 198.45 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 162.23     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (46%)     max: 179.23 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 296.88     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (34%)     max: 312.07 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 88.94     avg: 89.8     median: 89.8 (20%)     max: 90.72 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 111.4     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (29%)     max: 168.45 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 260.1     avg: 267.3     median: 267.3 (30%)     max: 274.54 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 56.97     avg: 57.7     median: 57.7 (19%)     max: 58.34 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 245.25     avg: 250.2     median: 250.2 (37%)     max: 255.24 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 273.29     avg: 292     median: 292 (32%)     max: 310.7 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 189.32     avg: 190.5     median: 190.5 (33%)     max: 191.68 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
77.9 fps (23%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
193.6 fps (52%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 290.6     avg: 302.5     median: 302.5 (49%)     max: 314.39 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 55.19     avg: 76.1     median: 76.1 (78%)     max: 96.95 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 310.86     avg: 312.6     median: 312.6 (46%)     max: 314.35 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 57.2     avg: 57.5     median: 57.5 (46%)     max: 57.85 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 113.79     avg: 125.2     median: 125.2 (62%)     max: 136.69 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 78.93     avg: 81.4     median: 81.4 (52%)     max: 83.77 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 80.93     avg: 83.6     median: 83.6 (38%)     max: 86.19 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
77.2 fps (23%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 189.79     avg: 190.6     median: 190.6 (20%)     max: 191.49 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 19.91     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (27%)     max: 36.49 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 138.82     avg: 139.8     median: 139.8 (23%)     max: 140.78 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 20     avg: 30.6     median: 30.6 (7%)     max: 41.16 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 51.74     avg: 63.3     median: 63.3 (30%)     max: 74.79 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 44.93     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (29%)     max: 45.26 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 51.62     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (22%)     max: 53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 261.5     median: 261.5 (15%)     max: 288 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 900     avg: 903     median: 902.5 (6%)     max: 905 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 91678     avg: 92046     median: 92045.5 (27%)     max: 92413 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 88420     avg: 90522     median: 90521.5 (30%)     max: 92623 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
79.8 Watt (11%)
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
86.5 Watt (12%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
90.4 Watt (20%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.9 fps per Watt (86%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (75%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
50.1 dB(A) (80%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
87.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
112
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
26.2
low 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
162.7 183.6 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
159.6 168 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.5 133.4 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.4 51.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
229
244
low 1920x1080
153.9 156 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.4 131.4 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88 88.5 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69 70.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
250.1
low 1920x1080
92.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
282 400 ~ 341 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
182.4 191.3 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151.4 160.1 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.5 140.7 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
115 155 ~ 135 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
105 116 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104 106 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96 101 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109.9 152 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.1 126.8 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.7 102 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
128.8 155.1 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.9 108 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.9 78.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
168 175.7 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.3 160.8 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136 151.5 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123.3 142.9 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
344 364.1 ~ 354 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
242.5 249.5 ~ 246 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.8 150.1 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.7 79.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
183.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
175.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
180
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty87.272.760.752.1
Baldur's Gate 39278.870.168.8
F1 2217316413051
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1551288870
Cyberpunk 2077 1.692.372.461.256.2
Strange Brigade341187156137
Far Cry 513511110599
X-Plane 11.1113111489
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark14210076
Dota 2 Reborn172156144133
The Witcher 335424614879
GTA V183.2177164.188.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
9


6
6


7
5

3
5
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 02:01:01

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.079s ... 0.081s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.081s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.081s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.082s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.082s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.082s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.084s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.084s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.084s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11603 +0.022s ... 0.105s

#13 got single benchmarks 11603 +0.022s ... 0.127s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.859s ... 0.986s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.986s

#17 Got 76 rows for game benchmarks. +0.051s ... 1.038s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.038s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 1.047s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.663s ... 1.711s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.714s

#22 return log +0s ... 1.714s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU graphics card

Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada 性能首次亮相:戴尔Precision 5480 工作站评测

Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada 性能首次亮相:戴尔Precision 5480 工作站评测

从视觉角度来看,这款产品没有太大变化,但与去年的Precision 5470 相比,GPU 的升级意义重大,值得那些希望在 14 英寸小机身上最大限度发挥性能的强大用户考虑。...
Intel Core i9-13900H | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.6 kg

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED W7604: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED W7604

Dell Precision 5480: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5480

HP Zbook Power G10: Intel Core i9-13900H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Zbook Power G10

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)