Notebookcheck Logo

华为MateBook 16s评测--配备桤木湖i7的大型多媒体笔记本电脑

向英特尔的过渡是昂贵的。 华为现在为多媒体笔记本MateBook 16配备了英特尔处理器,并称它为MateBook 16s。买家还得到一个Thunderbolt 4端口,一个最先进的Wi-Fi 6E模块,以及更多的按键行程。除此以外,没有太大的区别。这是否证明了价格上涨500欧元(510美元)的合理性?
Alder Lake Intel Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows

随着 MateBook 16,华为在其产品系列中拥有一个大型多媒体笔记本。到目前为止,它的AMD Ryzen处理器已经令人信服地提供了良好的性价比。然而,该制造商现在已经为新的MateBook 16s改用英特尔Alder Lake处理器(Core i7或Core i9)。有一些小的调整,新的处理器也提供了略微改善的性能,但立即可以注意到的是价格明显提高。我们的测试设备配备了Core i7-12700H,16GB内存和1TB PCIe SSD,价格为1699欧元(1730美元)。这比配备Ryzen 7 5800H的几乎相同的前代产品高出500欧元(510美元)。配备Core i9-12900H的机型也可以选择,价格为1899欧元(1940美元)。后者配备了16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘。

在这个价格类别中,确实没有很多直接的竞争对手,至少没有一个没有专用显卡的。高端产品中唯一的例外是戴尔XPS 15,鉴于其价格的上涨,MateBook 16s现在也被放在了高端产品中,该产品也可以不配置专用显卡。

Huawei MateBook 16s i7 (MateBook 16s Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 96 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2400 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 3:2, 2520 x 1680 pixel 189 PPI, capacitive, BOE XS TV160DKT-NH0, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, 512 GB 
, 887 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.8 x 351 x 253
Battery
84 Wh, 7330 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W USB-C PSU, Huawei Share, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.97 kg, Power Supply: 238 g
Price
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
07/2022
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2520x1680
86.5 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
R7 5800H, Vega 8
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2520x1680
85.7 %
06/2022
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2.1 kg18.41 mm16.00"1920x1200
84.2 %
10/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200
86.3 %
09/2021
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg16.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - 金属外壳,略作修改

MateBook 16s的基本外壳设计基本上没有变化。只是有非常小的修改。太空灰的金属外壳(不过,它确实有熟悉的蓝色/紫色光泽)仍然具有非常高的质量和坚固性。MateBook看起来非常适中,很好地融入了专业环境。唯一的两种颜色点缀是键盘和黑色的屏幕框架。哑光的表面不是特别容易收集灰尘。

一打开盖子,与之前的机型相比,一个小小的变化就变得很明显。屏幕的上边缘稍微厚一些,以容纳改进的1080p网络摄像头。底座和盖子都有一种牢固的感觉,但铰链并不能完全防止大盖子的轻微晃动。最大的打开角度仍然是145度左右。

老款MateBook 16的深度增加了1.9毫米,但占地面积本身并没有改变。由于屏幕的3:2纵横比,MateBook 16s的厚度是合理的,但其他16英寸的对比设备并没有更紧凑。它的重量约为2公斤,你可以为90瓦的电源适配器和USB-C电缆再增加240克。

尺寸比较

356.78 mm 251.88 mm 18.41 mm 2.1 kg355.9 mm 243.4 mm 16.8 mm 1.2 kg351 mm 253 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg351 mm 254.9 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt

就端口布局而言,与之相比基本上没有变化。 MateBook 16 AMD.仍然有两个USB-C端口和两个普通的USB-A插座。其中一个USB-C端口现在还支持最先进的Thunderbolt 4协议(40 GBit/s)。实际上,我们只是错过了一个读卡器,为它提供了大量的空间。

左边:USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 (Power Delivery, DisplayPort ALT Mode), USB-C with Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.0, 3.5毫米音频
左边:USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 (Power Delivery, DisplayPort ALT Mode), USB-C with Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.0, 3.5毫米音频
右:2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.1
右:2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.1

沟通

对于WLAN模块,华为也使用了英特尔组件,它已经支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准和蓝牙5.2。在我们的测试中,AX211E很容易连接到我们的华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络,并实现了非常高的、最重要的、稳定的传输速率。不同于其 前代产品芯片,WLAN模块不能再被替换。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1358 (1248min - 1479max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1338 (1139min - 1430max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=4)
1320 MBit/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
932 (463min - 990max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (285 - 1094, n=5, last 2 years)
789 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1546 (816min - 1632max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=4)
1409 MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (1199min - 1534max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (625 - 1675, n=5, last 2 years)
1127 MBit/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
664 (646min - 684max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1633 (1609min, 1609.87P1 - 1661max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (944 - 1822, n=38, last 2 years)
1406 MBit/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1404 (1320min - 1470max) MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=165)
1383 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1670 (1654min, 1654P1 - 1741max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=164)
1493 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 1803, n=38, last 2 years)
1481 MBit/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1409 (1377min - 1436max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1633 (1609-1661)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1670 (1654-1741)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头AI功能
网络摄像头AI功能

网络摄像头也进行了升级。1080p的传感器取代了720p的模块,并提供稍好的图像质量。华为推出的AI功能也很有趣。与Apple 设备一样,而且这在实践中效果很好,摄像头可以跟随用户,使其看起来像用户的眼睛直接盯着摄像头。还可以使用背景过滤器(与所使用的应用程序无关),但不能与用户跟踪相结合。当使用网络摄像头的高级功能时,我们注意到,视频录制明显地更颠簸。显然,这里还有一些工作要做。

ColorChecker
9.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook 16s i7: 8.56 ∆E min: 3.81 - max: 15.65 ∆E

维护

底部面板用Torx螺丝(T5)固定,很容易拆卸。现在,WLAN模块被焊接在主板上,所以维护选项仅限于M.2-2280固态硬盘和风扇清洁。

输入设备 - 华为现在有1.5毫米的键程

虽然更便宜的MateBook D16有一个完整的数字键盘,但华为仍然忠实于MateBook 16熟悉的布局,并坚持将扬声器放在键盘旁边的做法。然而,有一个值得欢迎的变化是,按键行程从1.3毫米增加到1.5毫米。经主观测量,触感也非常好。但是,与前代产品一样,一些按键往往会有一些响声,这在一定程度上降低了感知质量。两级白色键盘背光不能自动打开。电源按钮放在键盘的正上方,同时也是一个指纹扫描仪,效果不错。

大型ClickPad仍能顺利工作,但点击的声音仍然相当大。因此,我们的建议是,在输入时只需轻轻触碰该板。电容式触摸屏也没有出现问题。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

显示屏 - 3:2 IPS面板保持不变

说到显示屏,我们可以保持简短的分析。我们已经熟悉了MateBook 16的3:2 16英寸IPS面板。事实上,使用的是相同的显示屏幕。主观上,图像印象再次非常好,但我们的测试设备这次不那么明亮(但仍然高于宣传的300cd/m²)。黑度也是令人愉快的低,并确保了高对比度。响应时间很好,背光出血不是一个问题,我们也检测不到任何PWM。IPS面板的可视角度稳定性也非常好。

然而,鉴于现在较高的价格,我们对该显示面板仍有不满。特别是考虑到高反射率的表面,其亮度水平应该更高。更重要的是,没有用于自动亮度控制的亮度传感器,也没有更高的90或120 Hz刷新率。

子像素结构
子像素结构
一些屏幕出血
一些屏幕出血
视角稳定
视角稳定
318
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE XS TV160DKT-NH0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 338 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 318.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 309 cd/m²
Contrast: 1829:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
BOE XS TV160DKT-NH0, IPS, 2520x1680, 16.00
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
BOE TV160DKT-NH0, , 2520x1680, 16.00
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
BOE NV16N45, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.60
LG Gram 16 (2021)
LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-2%
2%
16%
26%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
63.1
-2%
67
4%
80.9
25%
95.8
49%
sRGB Coverage
96.7
94.9
-2%
95.9
-1%
100
3%
99.8
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.6
65.1
-2%
69.3
4%
79.1
19%
83.8
26%
Response Times
-15%
10%
-71%
-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.7 ?(16.8, 18.9)
41.2 ?(19.2, 22)
-15%
32 ?(16, 16)
10%
62.4 ?(31.6, 30.8)
-75%
44 ?(19, 25)
-23%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 ?(12.6, 10.6)
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
-14%
20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)
10%
38.8 ?(20.8, 18)
-67%
20 ?(8, 12)
14%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-25%
-133%
-85%
-172%
Brightness middle
311
357
15%
320.7
3%
632
103%
331
6%
Brightness
319
349
9%
309
-3%
606
90%
309
-3%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
90
-1%
91
0%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.17
0.21
-24%
0.36
-112%
0.29
-71%
0.22
-29%
Contrast
1829
1700
-7%
891
-51%
2179
19%
1505
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.6
-60%
4.18
-318%
3.5
-250%
4.64
-364%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.7
3.9
-129%
8.48
-399%
6.4
-276%
9.82
-478%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.8
0.6
25%
0.77
4%
2
-150%
3.16
-295%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.4
-60%
6.3
-320%
5
-233%
6.9
-360%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.14 103%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.34 94%
CCT
6432 101%
6728 97%
6258 104%
7033 92%
7904 82%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -19%
-40% / -84%
-47% / -62%
-50% / -105%

* ... smaller is better

根据华为的说法,所有显示面板都在工厂进行了校准,我们可以证实这一点。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行的分析显示,在出厂时只有非常小的偏差;无论是颜色还是灰度。也没有色温或偏色的问题。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN灰度校准
CalMAN灰度校准
CalMAN饱和度校准
CalMAN饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker校准
CalMAN ColorChecker校准

使用我们自己的校准软件(我们的配置文件可在上面免费下载),我们只能非常轻微地提高渲染力。任何差异对肉眼来说都是难以察觉的。然而,这个显示面板再次只提供较小的sRGB色彩空间。

与sRGB相比
与sRGB相比
VS DCI-P3
VS DCI-P3
VS Adobe RGB
VS Adobe RGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.6 ms rise
↘ 10.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 18.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

MateBook 16s在户外感觉不是很自信。屏幕具有高度的反射性,而且仅有300多cd/m²的亮度,实在不够高。即使在没有直接光源的情况下,也很难避免反射,并在任何合理的程度上识别内容。

在阳光下
在阳光下

性能 - 配备英特尔Alder Lake的MateBook

 
 

测试条件

预装的PC管理器有一个可选的电源模式,也可以通过键盘快捷键Fn+P激活。在电源模式下,PL1值(代表永久负载)从45瓦增加到54瓦。然而,由于处理器在正常模式下也可以消耗高达96瓦的功率,在日常使用中的差异并不特别明显。即使只是在CPU负载下,其优势也可以忽略不计,这一点我们将在下面证明。原则上,我们在正常模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。

处理器 - 酷睿i7 12700H

英特尔酷睿i7-12700H属于目前的第12代(桤木湖),提供了一个使用性能和效率核心的混合架构。我们已经对这款处理器进行了多次测试,所有进一步的技术信息都可以在这里找到。酷睿i7的最大消耗量为96瓦,然后稳定在54瓦。

在Cinebench循环中,相当明显的是,在运行几次后,性能明显下降,与旧的MateBook 16Ryzen 7 5800H ,几乎没有任何性能差异。更重要的是,启用性能模式后的差异非常小,在我们看来,这并不能证明较高的风扇噪音是合理的。

Cinebench R15 score

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2157 (2075.23-2604.17)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø2024 (1871.61-2544.85)
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1995 (1980.49-2009.14)
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1409 (1241.97-1689.4)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H; Ultra-Performance: Ø1187 (1131.35-1276.65)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H: Ø1121 (1099.29-1142.47)
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环

在基准测试中,MateBook 16s自然得益于高功率限制,可以取得良好的结果。新性能核心的单核性能也非常好,但这是以更高的功耗为代价的,几乎是30瓦(单核)。

在电池模式下,处理器的功耗降低到40瓦,这只影响到多核性能(-25%)。更多CPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
84.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
84.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
78.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
67.8 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
65.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
54.1 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
43.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
14281 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (3127 - 30789, n=97, last 2 years)
13954 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10336 Points -28%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
9320 (8836.82min - 9320.05max) Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
6806 Points -52%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4652 Points -67%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
1792 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=94, last 2 years)
1703 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
1668 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1349 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1338 Points -25%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1311 Points -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
5459 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 11768, n=94, last 2 years)
5232 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3993 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
3606 Points -34%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
2707 Points -50%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1847 Points -66%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
640 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=94, last 2 years)
638 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
560 Points -18%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
518 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
518 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
2604.2 (2075.23min - 2604.2max) Points
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
2545 (1871.61min - 2544.85max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (580 - 4703, n=103, last 2 years)
2280 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2009 (1980.49min - 2009.14max) Points -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
1689 (1241.97min - 1689.4max) Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1277 (1131min - 1277max) Points -51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1142 (1099.29min - 1142.47max) Points -56%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
805 Points -69%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
255 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=96, last 2 years)
249 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
239 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points -9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
210 Points -18%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
205 Points -20%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
771 Seconds * -227%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
426 Seconds * -81%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
334 Seconds * -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 956, n=92, last 2 years)
275 Seconds * -17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
254 Seconds * -8%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * +5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11813 - 119900, n=87, last 2 years)
56363 MIPS +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
55285 MIPS
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
36416 MIPS -34%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
32228 MIPS -42%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22300 MIPS -60%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
5725 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=87, last 2 years)
5612 MIPS -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5593 MIPS -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
5387 MIPS -6%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5113 MIPS -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
5089 MIPS -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
12994 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3307 - 23059, n=97, last 2 years)
11134 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7641 Points -41%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
7607 Points -41%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
5954 Points -54%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5163 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
1816 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=97, last 2 years)
1741 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
1683 Points -7%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1500 Points -17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1480 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.1 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.12 - 30.5, n=85, last 2 years)
15.3 fps -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.4 fps -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
10.9 fps -32%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
9.06 fps -44%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.63 fps -65%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.6 s * -22%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
49.1 s * -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=89, last 2 years)
48.5 s * -20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
46.6 s * -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * -13%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * -13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.5 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.625 sec * -41%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
0.589 sec * -33%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.517 sec * -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.501 sec * -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.763, n=87, last 2 years)
0.4866 sec * -10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4441 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2604.2 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
128.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
255 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
91 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
81.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
79.7 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46.1 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD -9!
Intel Core i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
14233 KRay/s +140%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=85, last 2 years)
12612 KRay/s +113%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +83%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5924 KRay/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5314 KRay/s -10%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4894 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
89105 Points +215%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=85, last 2 years)
64632 Points +129%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +87%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28278 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24700 Points -13%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23249 Points -18%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s +49%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
3042 MB/s +47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=85, last 2 years)
2991 MB/s +45%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2069 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1769 MB/s -14%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1573 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
95558 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31314 - 134321, n=85, last 2 years)
92210 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92168 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73641 Points -20%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50442 Points -45%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
11585 Points +61%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=85, last 2 years)
9009 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7216 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6065 Points -16%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4038 Points -44%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
49105 Points +210%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=85, last 2 years)
33297 Points +110%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +76%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
15832 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14489 Points -8%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14077 Points -11%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
119337 MB/s +76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=85, last 2 years)
76232 MB/s +12%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67918 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58344 MB/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38267 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (228 - 1901, n=85, last 2 years)
848 MB/s +29%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
776 MB/s +18%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
655 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
644 MB/s -2%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
287 MB/s -56%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
7484 KRay/s +132%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=85, last 2 years)
6743 KRay/s +109%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +86%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3221 KRay/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2968 KRay/s -8%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2579 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44296 MPixel/s +6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41970 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 52727, n=85, last 2 years)
35384 MPixel/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
18980 MPixel/s -55%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
15071 MPixel/s -64%

系统性能

在日常使用中,MateBook 16s是一个反应灵敏的系统,但主观上与旧的MateBook 16没有区别,在合成的PCMark 10中,新的MateBook 16s的表现超过了它的AMD前辈(即使差异非常小)。

同样,正如Apple ,在其产品范围内促进连接,MateBook 16s连接了不同的华为设备。例如,在笔记本电脑和该品牌的平板电脑或智能手机之间移动文件是非常容易的。华为还提供了在MateBook上使用华为相册中的移动应用程序的选项。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4039 - 8670, n=82, last 2 years)
6552 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6365 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
6281 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5541 - 6281, n=7)
5905 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
5000 Points -20%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4917 Points -22%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4502 Points -28%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
11699 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10569 - 11699, n=7)
11168 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
10690 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=82, last 2 years)
10417 Points -11%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
10149 Points -13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9463 Points -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9429 Points -19%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9729 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5462 - 11186, n=82, last 2 years)
8685 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
8038 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6690 - 8038, n=7)
7285 Points -9%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
6888 Points -14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6466 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6167 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (3861 - 13548, n=82, last 2 years)
8566 Points +20%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
7151 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6207 - 7401, n=7)
6879 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6730 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
5834 Points -18%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4616 Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4047 Points -43%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1907 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1492 - 1907, n=7)
1717 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=88, last 2 years)
1683 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1495 Points -22%
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1832 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1499 - 1832, n=7)
1668 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=88, last 2 years)
1609 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1486 Points -19%
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2013 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (933 - 2865, n=88, last 2 years)
1868 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1507 - 2016, n=7)
1815 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1596 Points -21%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1831 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1384 - 1831, n=7)
1601 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=88, last 2 years)
1454 Points -21%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1253 Points -32%
PCMark 10 Score
6281 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69828 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64091 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 92447, n=85, last 2 years)
58548 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38640 MB/s -45%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
38355 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69281 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62442 MB/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 89474, n=85, last 2 years)
58261 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
44195 MB/s -36%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40762 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66479 MB/s +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=85, last 2 years)
61944 MB/s +5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59208 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
43701 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
36119 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
108.7 ns *
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 142.4, n=84, last 2 years)
96.8 ns * +11%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92.6 ns * +15%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
83.2 ns * +23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns * +28%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载),MateBook 16s使用目前的BIOS版本显示了一些小的限制。因此,它不太适合使用实时音频软件。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
984 μs *
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
695.6 μs *
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
454.3 μs *
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
420.3 μs *

* ... smaller is better

储存

M.2固态硬盘可以被替换。
M.2固态硬盘可以被替换。

我们的测试设备配备了一个M.2固态硬盘,存储容量为1TB,但与华为以前的笔记本电脑一样,固态硬盘再次被分区。这里特别令人不安的是,系统驱动器的分区非常小,只为用户提供了大约70GB。如果你不注意安装和下载,你很快就会出现容量问题。

在速度方面,也有很大的改进余地。华为只使用了PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘,制造商无法告诉我们该端口是否支持更快的PCIe 4.0标准。超过3GB/s的传输率绝不是坏事,但考虑到价格,这里可能会有更高的速度。进一步的SSD基准测试可在这里Laptop SSD & HDD Benchmarks

Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3069.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2855.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 900.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 608.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 233.28 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1490.79 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1295.56 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
88.4 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
84.4 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
82.1 pt
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
 
79.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
72.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
55.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
40.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2849 (2830.11min - 2848.53max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=84, last 2 years)
2818 MB/s -1%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (2012 - 2849, n=3)
2510 MB/s -12%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
2405 (2386.61min - 2405.43max) MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1766 (1756.36min - 1766.46max) MB/s -38%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1730 (1725.12min - 1730.26max) MB/s -39%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1644 (1629.16min - 1644.23max) MB/s -42%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=84, last 2 years)
2952 MB/s +17%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2518 (2403.55min - 2518.47max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2489 (1082.97min - 2488.9max) MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
2226 (2208.93min - 2226.13max) MB/s -12%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1438 - 2518, n=3)
2086 MB/s -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2044 (1356.87min - 2043.99max) MB/s -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1396 (1366.92min - 1396.49max) MB/s -45%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=84, last 2 years)
5146 MB/s +51%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
3445 (3030.59min - 3444.78max) MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
3415 (3238.21min - 3415.3max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
3291 (3124.97min - 3290.85max) MB/s -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3205 (3054.06min - 3204.75max) MB/s -6%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (2883 - 3415, n=3)
3163 MB/s -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
2408 (2106.99min - 2408.16max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=84, last 2 years)
3910 MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2917 (1731.09min - 2916.97max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2854 (2806.46min - 2853.97max) MB/s -2%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2496 (2283.43min - 2496.07max) MB/s -14%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1911 - 2917, n=3)
2386 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
2226 (2211.03min - 2226.34max) MB/s -24%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1437 (1389.99min - 1436.61max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=84, last 2 years)
64.1 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
63.3 (62.05min - 63.31max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
54.3 (54.16min - 54.32max) MB/s -14%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (43.1 - 63.3, n=3)
54 MB/s -15%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
53.3 (53.18min - 53.31max) MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
52.7 (51.31min - 52.65max) MB/s -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
46.7 (39.85min - 46.65max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
279 (272.93min - 278.93max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (270 - 279, n=3)
274 MB/s -2%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
208 (205.9min - 208.09max) MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (82.2 - 378, n=84, last 2 years)
179.9 MB/s -36%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
140.5 (134.34min - 140.51max) MB/s -50%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
135 (134.03min - 135.47max) MB/s -52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
113 (108.86min - 112.54max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2139 (1104.16min - 2139.02max) MB/s +60%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1568 (1566.9min - 1567.68max) MB/s +17%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1336 - 1391, n=3)
1371 MB/s +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (315 - 4358, n=84, last 2 years)
1342 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1336 (1332.52min - 1335.83max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
767 (753.68min - 766.54max) MB/s -43%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
520 (513.42min - 520.41max) MB/s -61%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1641 (1097.57min - 1640.78max) MB/s +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1512 (1199.87min - 1511.8max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1241 - 1512, n=3)
1353 MB/s -11%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1250 (1244.91min - 1249.75max) MB/s -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (221 - 4074, n=84, last 2 years)
1090 MB/s -28%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
441 (428.2min - 440.81max) MB/s -71%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
350 (341.82min - 349.69max) MB/s -77%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=81, last 2 years)
5075 Points +19%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4934 Points +16%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
4264 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (3787 - 4264, n=3)
4030 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
3922 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2541 Points -40%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
2040 Points -52%
Score Read
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1915 Points +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=81, last 2 years)
1695 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1668 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1574 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1279 - 1574, n=3)
1443 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
997 Points -37%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
687 Points -56%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=81, last 2 years)
2572 Points +36%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2060 Points +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1895 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1839 - 1895, n=3)
1869 Points -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1571 Points -17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1439 Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
574 Points -70%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5639, n=81, last 2 years)
3944 MB/s +42%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
2955 MB/s +7%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (2769 - 2967, n=3)
2846 MB/s +3%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2808 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2769 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2602 MB/s -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1940.5 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5101, n=81, last 2 years)
2521 MB/s +8%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2345 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
2328 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1879 - 2328, n=3)
2159 MB/s -7%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
2080 MB/s -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
976 MB/s -58%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
797.61 MB/s -66%
4K Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=81, last 2 years)
63.2 MB/s +6%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (59.5 - 62.2, n=3)
60.9 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
59.5 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
54.57 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
51.1 MB/s -14%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
50.2 MB/s -16%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
42.99 MB/s -28%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
246.94 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (236 - 249, n=3)
244 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.8 - 328, n=81, last 2 years)
188.4 MB/s -24%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
141.68 MB/s -43%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
138.6 MB/s -44%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
127.5 MB/s -48%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
127.1 MB/s -49%
4K-64 Read
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1584 MB/s +28%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1321 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1237.44 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=81, last 2 years)
1237 MB/s 0%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (920 - 1237, n=3)
1098 MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
748.77 MB/s -39%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
383.3 MB/s -69%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=81, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s +51%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1687 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
1415.62 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (1403 - 1416, n=3)
1409 MB/s 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1346 MB/s -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
1103 MB/s -22%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
352.28 MB/s -75%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.128 ms * -540%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=81, last 2 years)
0.05886 ms * -194%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.037 ms * -85%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.035 ms * -75%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
0.034 ms * -70%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (0.02 - 0.029, n=3)
0.02467 ms * -23%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
0.651 ms * -4240%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.117 ms * -680%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=81, last 2 years)
0.05873 ms * -292%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
0.031 ms * -107%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.028 ms * -87%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
  (0.015 - 0.019, n=3)
0.01667 ms * -11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
0.015 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7: Ø3503 (3342.47-3511.26)

图形卡

GPU-Z Intel Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Intel Xe Graphics G7

华为没有专用显卡,所有的图形计算都由集成的 Xe Graphics G7(96 EUs)管理。,这一点我们已经从旧的Tiger Lake 移动处理器中了解到。iGPU完全可以满足日常使用,包括播放高分辨率的视频,但新的 Radeon 680M的Ryzen 6000 CPU提供了明显更多的功率,也有更有效的视频解码器。至少在图形性能方面,与RX Vega 8相比,已经提高了约40-50%。 RX Vega 8相比,至少图形性能提高了40-50%。

因此,游戏的野心不应该太深远,因为人们将不得不把自己限制在旧的或要求不高的游戏中,如Dota 2。例如,《F1 2021》等热门游戏仍然可以在中/高分辨率下流畅运行。图形性能在持续负载和电池供电的情况下保持稳定,更多的GPU基准测试可以在这里找到 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
40 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
38.6 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
36.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
33.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
32.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
11 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3408 - 60250, n=87, last 2 years)
18296 Points +172%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9095 Points +35%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
6735 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7471, n=192)
6342 Points -6%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6305 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
6117 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
6004 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
1679 Points -75%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 150699, n=61, last 2 years)
57744 Points +131%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
29795 Points +19%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
29609 Points +19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13162 - 38040, n=168)
26187 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
24981 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
23151 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
10124 Points -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=87, last 2 years)
13540 Points +141%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6683 Points +19%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5654 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
5608 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 6143, n=204)
4897 Points -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4032 Points -28%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3734 Points -33%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
1368 Points -76%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=87, last 2 years)
5121 Points +204%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2287 Points +36%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
1687 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1664 Points -1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1871, n=201)
1493 Points -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1371 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1186 Points -30%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
373 Points -78%
3DMark 11 Performance
7527 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
23270 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5320 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1928 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.2 (13-16)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 105.3 94.5 27.6 11.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 102 66 33 14.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 133.9 95.1 74.7 67.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 48.9 26.8 18.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 57.9 38.4 36.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 63 34 31 29
Strange Brigade (2018) 95.7 47.2 36.9 30
F1 2021 (2021) 119.4 56 44.7 30.1
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 110 51 37 33

排放--华为继续依靠两个风扇

系统噪音

用两个风扇进行冷却
用两个风扇进行冷却

在日常使用中,MateBook 16s通常是一个非常安静的伴侣,但似乎这两个风扇经常以较慢的速度运行,因为噪音往往很难察觉。只要你保持在正常模式下,满载时的音量在39 dB(A)还是可以的(或游戏时~35)。只有在性能模式下,它才会变得非常响亮,最高可达48.4 dB(A)。相对而言,这太吵了。

与MateBook 16相比,基本的系统噪音特性也略有变化。在日常使用中,风扇似乎启动得更早一些。其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫,没有被发现。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 25.2 / 27.2 dB(A)
Load
34.8 / 39 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203235.428.128.734.22527.235.827.329.933.73125.430.124.122.328.94025.731.428.226.527.45029.129.425.122.1286323.828.520.719.828.68022.725.221.518.428.710023.522.120.917.725.712524.321.120.717.624.616023.220.624.816.226.52002519.127.115.729.225024.920.620.815.822.331524.920.422.115.221.940027.119.623.113.422.850027.820.122.212.622.863027.72123.611.624.98002720.823.910.824.3100025.319.222.810.921.8125027.620.223.910.324.5160028.720.423.910.825200027.619.823.111.124.2250028.118.823.411.323.6315028.820.724.911.823.740002918.924.21224.2500025.315.919.112.519630022.816.218.412.417.5800017.515.916.812.614.41000015.213.814.412.714.41250013.713.614.112.414.21600012.313.313.512.115.4SPL3931.334.82435.1N3.11.52.10.52.2median 25.3median 19.8median 22.8median 12.4median 23.6Delta3.61.72.91.92.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHuawei MateBook 16s i7
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
Noise
1%
5%
6%
3%
off / environment *
24
24.8
-3%
23.2
3%
24.4
-2%
26
-8%
Idle Minimum *
24
24.8
-3%
23.5
2%
24.4
-2%
26
-8%
Idle Average *
25.2
24.8
2%
23.5
7%
24.4
3%
26
-3%
Idle Maximum *
27.2
26.7
2%
23.5
14%
24.4
10%
26
4%
Load Average *
34.8
32
8%
29.4
16%
26.1
25%
30.8
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.8
32
8%
35.6
-2%
33.2
5%
Load Maximum *
39
42.4
-9%
39.7
-2%
37.7
3%
31.1
20%

* ... smaller is better

温度

总体而言,表面温度没有任何问题。在日常使用中没有明显的问题,即使在极端负荷下,也只有底部面板上有一个小的热点。我们在一小时的压力测试后测得48℃。这方面的问题更多在于电源。华为能够使90瓦的电源更加紧凑,但是它变得非常热(~65℃)。

在压力测试中,相当明显的是,处理器的功耗迅速达到45瓦,在电源模式下达到54瓦,然后稳定在这些数值。

CPU/iGPU压力测试
CPU/iGPU压力测试
Max. Load
 39.3 °C40.9 °C37.8 °C 
 38.7 °C40.4 °C36.3 °C 
 27.9 °C27 °C27.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
40.3 °C48.3 °C43.5 °C
32.8 °C39.3 °C34.8 °C
29.1 °C30.2 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  64.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
6%
-6%
9%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.9
40.2
2%
42.2
-3%
42.8
-5%
46.9
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
48.3
49.7
-3%
47.4
2%
41.2
15%
45.1
7%
Idle Upper Side *
29.2
26.4
10%
32.2
-10%
25.8
12%
26.4
10%
Idle Bottom *
30.4
26.4
13%
33.6
-11%
26.2
14%
24.1
21%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

键盘旁边的两个立体声扬声器没有变化,我们的测量结果几乎完全相同。华为可能在软件上做了小的调整。它们可以变得非常响亮,占用很多空间,而且轻微的立体声效果也相当明显。再多一点低音就好了,但对于正常的背景音乐播放或偶尔的视频,内置的音响系统绝对够用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.732.62529.9373122.3344026.535.65022.138.46319.838.68018.443.210017.756.412517.660.616016.259.820015.761.125015.861.231515.262.540013.465.650012.667.463011.668.280010.876.7100010.977.7125010.377.8160010.879.1200011.176.9250011.377.2315011.875.740001272.9500012.570.7630012.467.9800012.669.51000012.767.61250012.464.41600012.162.5SPL2487.3N0.569.7median 12.4median 68.2Delta1.96.738.33227.426.433.135.832.5372633.920.744.619.453.823.761.318.563.416.765.517.568.317.269.113.169.211.670.810.772.311.171.511.571.710.873.310.781.310.783.11178.61174.811.475.411.869.31274.312.273.712.472.112.369.212.365.611.556.323.888.80.577.6median 11.8median 71.723hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MateBook 16s i7Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--英特尔MateBook需要更多电量

消耗功率

虽然这绝不是不可避免的,但功耗是MateBook 16s的最大问题之一。它的 前身有Ryzen 7 5800H,并有一个135瓦的标准电源。现在只有酷睿i9版本是这种情况。相比之下,MateBook 16s的酷睿i7型号只得到一个90瓦的适配器,尽管其功率限制已经提高。如果仅处理器就消耗近100瓦,人们会问自己,一个90瓦的电源怎么可能够用。整个系统的最大功耗几乎达到135瓦,这意味着在CPU负载过程开始时可能需要从电池中提取45瓦(见下图的充电率)。这对电池来说是不健康的。

然而,这不仅是在压力测试条件下的情况,也是在使用所有内核的任何CPU负载中的情况。我们无法理解为什么在价格大幅上涨的情况下还能节省电源费用。尽管显示屏颜色稍暗,但空闲功耗率也略有增加。这只能归因于英特尔处理器在其他方面的类似配置。

电池放电压力测试(红色:电源模式,绿色:正常模式)。
电池放电压力测试(红色:电源模式,绿色:正常模式)。
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.45 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.8 / 13.2 / 13.8 Watt
Load midlight 75.2 / 90.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 2520x1680, 16.00
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
R7 5800H, Vega 8, Lite-On CA5-8D512, , 2520x1680, 16.00
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.60
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
13%
27%
34%
40%
30%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
6.8
4.6
32%
5.3
22%
5.3
22%
3.8
44%
5.26 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=184)
23%
7.28 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=93, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Average *
13.2
10.5
20%
8.3
37%
9
32%
9
32%
8.46 ?(3.8 - 63, n=184)
36%
11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=93, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Maximum *
13.8
11.2
19%
9.6
30%
9.7
30%
11.3
18%
10.6 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=184)
23%
14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=93, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Average *
75.2
59.1
21%
54.3
28%
30.3
60%
35.2
53%
44.8 ?(12.5 - 77.5, n=184)
40%
77.3 ?(14.3 - 147, n=92, last 2 years)
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56.1
58.6
-4%
43.9
22%
30.6
45%
Load Maximum *
90.6
98.3
-8%
70
23%
76.2
16%
43.5
52%
66.6 ?(30.1 - 118, n=184)
26%
119.3 ?(44 - 247, n=92, last 2 years)
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø56.1 (52.1-79.3)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.7 (72.9-90.7)

Power Consumption external Monitor

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.9 (72.7-90.8)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø90.5 (90.3-90.6)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø37.7 (34.3-43.2)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø69.1 (58.6-75)

电池寿命

开启设备后的充电过程
开启设备后的充电过程

能源消耗的增加和相同的电池容量意味着新MateBook 16s的电池寿命比配备AMD处理器的MateBook 16更差。在150cd/m²(最大亮度的51%)的WLAN测试中,我们现在只达到8小时的运行时间。这当然也是由于新的性能核心的更高的功耗造成的。在全亮度下,只有不到6小时,而在视频播放上,只有9小时多一点。老款MateBook 16在每个类别中都能轻松多用2小时。在设备开启的情况下,整个充电过程大约需要两个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 103)
8h 03min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 103)
5h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 56min
Huawei MateBook 16s i7
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
R7 5800H, Vega 8, 84 Wh
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 87 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), 56 Wh
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
17%
74%
-8%
111%
8%
H.264
555
654
18%
1204
117%
680 ?(319 - 1481, n=49, last 2 years)
23%
WiFi v1.3
483
770
59%
876
81%
445
-8%
943
95%
560 ?(262 - 1204, n=92, last 2 years)
16%
Load
116
86
-26%
193
66%
258
122%
96.9 ?(39 - 215, n=73, last 2 years)
-16%

Pros

+ 高质量、坚固的铝制外壳
+ 卓越的CPU和系统性能
+ 优秀的3:2显示屏
+ 雷电4和Wi-Fi 6E
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 良好的温度管理
+ 华为共享(与平板电脑、智能手机共享)

Cons

- 新的90W电源适配器不够用
- 电池寿命比前代产品明显缩短
- 高反射率的显示屏
- 有限的维护选项
- 不必要的SSD分区
- 价格明显较高

结论 - 转向英特尔也有一些不利因素

在审查中。华为MateBook 16s。设备由华为德国公司提供。
在审查中。华为MateBook 16s。设备由华为德国公司提供。

新的MateBook 16s接替的是 MateBook 16并有许多相似之处,但改用英特尔处理器后,以前的良好性价比已经所剩无几。Alder Lake一代的新英特尔酷睿i7的性能只比旧的AMD芯片稍好,而Wi-Fi 6E或额外的按键行程等改进当然也可以用AMD处理器。真正有说服力的英特尔处理器的论据是不存在的,除此之外,电池寿命也更短。尽管如此,价格还是上涨了500欧元(510美元)。

这引起了更多的问题,因为考虑到该机的高价格,人们会对显示器有更多的期待。图像质量非常好,但亮度仅略高于300cd/m²。更重要的是,sRGB覆盖率,没有亮度传感器,以及只有60赫兹,都不符合这个价格的期望。英特尔处理器的iGPU也只是无法与小型的专用显卡竞争。如果你要省去专用显卡,配备新的Radeon 680M的AMD处理器将是一个明显更好的选择。

使用新的英特尔处理器,与旧的MateBook 16 AMD相比,性能只略有提高,但电池寿命也更短。总而言之,新MateBook 16s有些令人失望,尤其是考虑到它的性价比。如果采用目前规格的AMD处理器,整体包装可能会更有吸引力。

电源也是一个重要问题,因为老款MateBook 16标配135瓦的适配器,而现在买家将不得不使用MateBook 16s的i7版本所配的90瓦电源。这在高负荷下的功率根本不够,而且设备也会变得非常热。在这种情况下,新电源更紧凑、更轻的事实没有什么好处,而且很明显,这是试图在错误的地方进行节约。

总而言之,MateBook 16s是一款不错的多媒体笔记本,但我们很难在这个价格上推荐它。如果你可以不使用1080p网络摄像头或稍长的按键行程等新功能,你最好看看旧的MateBook 16,它仍然可用,配备Ryzen 7 5800H,价格已经降到1000欧元(1020美元)以下。

价格和可用性

在市场发布会上,华为将MateBook 16s定价为1,699欧元(1,730美元)。这个价格包括外部显示器MateView GT 27和一个背包。带有显示器和背包的MateBook 16s Core i9-12900H将于7月14日上市,价格为1899欧元(1940美元)。

Huawei MateBook 16s i7 - 07/08/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
91 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
63 / 20-72 → 83%
Battery
80 / 95 → 84%
Display
87%
Games Performance
70 / 90 → 78%
Application Performance
93 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
79%
Noise
93 / 95 → 98%
Audio
87%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Average
79%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为MateBook 16s评测--配备桤木湖i7的大型多媒体笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-07-11 (Update: 2022-07-11)