华为MateBook 14 (2021)回顾。带触摸功能的MacBook Air？
华为MateBook 14 2021是一款经典的超极本，拥有3：2格式的触摸屏。它可以被置于中端，低于MateBook X Pro，高于 MateBook D 14.相应地，约1100欧元（约1189美元）的价格，当然也比大多数旗舰机型更实惠。你甚至可以在大多数时候以少100到150欧元（约合108美元-162美元）的价格买到它。
Apple'sMacBook Air M1和申克视界14是其直接竞争对手，属于类似的价格段，还有微软的Surface Laptop 3和联想Yoga Slim 7 14.其他的比较应该是有趣的，包括华为的内部 MateBook 14s和 MateBook X Pro.
除了我们在这里测试的英特尔酷睿i7版本外，还有一款其他方面相同的 MateBook 14与AMD RyzenCPU的MateBook 14，我们能够在同一时间进行测试，并与英特尔型号进行比较。在价格方面，配备AMD Ryzen 5 5500U价格比英特尔版本低约100至150欧元（约108-162美元）。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.7 mm | 14.20" | 2520x1680 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | Schenker Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
外壳：太空灰铝和细长的边框
就像它的名字一样，这个适度的铝制外壳让我们第一眼就想起了Apple MacBook。虽然做工很好，但它没有达到 MacBook Air M1.底座和显示屏盖子非常耐翘，但铰链在你改变显示屏角度时明显晃动，比如说。
最大的打开角度是150度，而且你不能只用一只手打开它。键盘甲板在压力下的弯曲程度比我们希望的要大，这也对打字体验产生了边际影响。
华为用 "太空灰 "来描述颜色，而几代产品的外壳都没有变化--包括颜色。从主观上和触觉上看，MateBook 14 2021提供了高质量的感觉，但仍有改进的空间。
华为MateBook 14的宽度为307毫米（约12英寸），与MacBook Air M1的305毫米相比，华为MateBook 14提供了一个更大的3:2格式的14英寸显示屏，这对网络和办公更加友好。边框也明显更小，导致屏幕与身体的比例达到90%。
另一方面，1.49公斤（约3.28磅）的重量对于这种尺寸的超极本来说是相当重的，但MacBook Air也不是最轻的次笔记本，只有1.3公斤（约2.9磅）。虽然其15.9毫米（约0.63英寸）的高度可以被认为是苗条的，但由于其明显的楔形，MacBook Air看起来又要苗条很多。微软的Surface Laptop 3,联想的Yoga Slim 7，以及内部的 MateBook X Pro更加纤薄，而轻薄的兴业银行Vision 14以其1公斤（约2.2磅）的重量更符合超极本的概念。
与Apple's MacBook Air M1比较
设备。MateBook 14中的快速Wi-Fi 6和USB-A 3.2
我们高兴地看到，MateBook 14 2021包括两个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1连接，而上一代产品在其中一个端口仍然使用USB 2.0标准。此外，还有一个HDMI连接，一个音频端口，以及一个支持DisplayPort的USB-C 3.2 Gen 1连接，并且是为笔记本电脑充电的唯一途径。
在英特尔的型号中，你甚至不得不放弃Thunderbolt。然而，这比其他超极本能提供的总体上要多，包括只有USB-C的MacBook Air。
沟通
在我们的测试领域，几乎所有的次笔记本都共享英特尔的AX201卡，使用Wi-Fi 6标准。在大约1.4Gbit/s的速度下，发送和接收性能非常好。MacBook Air在这里仍然明显落后，约为0.6Gbit/s，而 MateBook 14 AMD仍然在类似的缓慢范围内。联想的Yoga Slim 7也只达到这个缓慢的速度，尽管使用了相同的英特尔AX201。
网络摄像头
华为的720p网络摄像头几乎已经是一个经典。你可以通过按下网络摄像头键来激活它，然后它将从这个键上弹出。由此产生的摄像头角度对 "鼻孔摄像头 "的称号是公正的。否则，质量是一般的，就像其他笔记本电脑一样。
辅料
除了重量为200克（约7盎司）的带有USB-C接口的紧凑型65瓦充电器外，没有其他附带附件。包装很简单，也很实用。显然，华为并不太关心回收材料。华为提供USB-C对接站。是通用的，适用于他们所有支持USB-C与Power Delivery和DisplayPort的设备。
在软件方面，预装了 "Huawei Share"，允许从华为智能手机和平板电脑无线传输数据和显示内容。
维护
卸下十颗Torx（T5）螺丝后，你仍然需要一个撬动工具来打开机箱。没有太多的维修选择。虽然M.2固态硬盘可以被替换，但Wi-Fi模块是焊接的。双风扇系统可以完全拆下并清洗，拧入的电池也应该相当容易更换。
担保
华为为MateBook 14提供为期2年的自带保修，并提供免费送货服务。
输入设备。MateBook 14有一个大而精确的触摸板
键盘
键盘拥有两段式照明和足够大的按键，行程相当柔和，压力点明显。然而，按键太容易被触发，对我们的测试者来说，留下了一个稍微太过海绵的印象。 按键行程不算太短，特别是对于超极本来说。 键盘盖在压力下和打字时弯曲，这造成一些最小的烦恼。回车键也有点咔咔作响。
然而，总的来说，你仍然可以准确、快速地打字，并在较长的时间内使用该键盘。尽管我们更喜欢 "主页 "和 "结束 "等功能键。顺便说一下，电源键也有一个可靠的指纹识别器。
MacBook Air的键程明显较短，但压力点却更清晰。总体而言，它的质量似乎更高，我们更喜欢它。 联想的Yoga Slim 7也提供了一个更好的键盘。
触摸板
12 x 7.2厘米（约4.7 x 2.8英寸）的触摸板具有非常好的滑动特性，由于采用了WindowsPrecision 驱动程序，鼠标指针可以在显示器表面准确移动。多点触摸手势可以快速执行，集成在底部区域的点击键可以可靠地触发鼠标点击，并有大量反馈。另一方面，MacBook Air拥有迄今为止最好的触摸板。
显示屏。MateBook 14也因其3:2的触摸屏而大放异彩。
3:2格式的14英寸显示屏不仅在视觉上大放异彩，而且在一些测量方面也是如此。即使它没有完全达到制造商所承诺的sRGB色彩空间的100%覆盖率，但其数值仍然非常好，达到97.4%。然而，在扩展的色彩空间中，事情看起来更加平均，比如AdobeRGB色彩空间的67.5%。平均亮度为367 cd/m²（峰值408 cd/m²），大大超过了制造商300 cd/m²的规格，即使前辈和AMD的兄弟姐妹机型（无触摸屏）又是更亮，约450 cd/m²。
在2,510:1，我们测量的对比度也跳到了之前IPS面板未知的高点（根据制造商的说法是1,500:1），将竞争对手甩在后面，除了 联想Yoga Slim 7除了联想Yoga Slim 7，它的对比度甚至略高，为2,646:1。顺便说一下，在DCI-P3领域，M1 MacBook Air的数值为98.5%。 M1 MacBook Air提供了最好的色彩准确性。而在Delta-E值方面，也只有MacBook提供了更好的表现。
2,160 x 1,440的分辨率及其产生的185 ppi的像素密度，加上触摸屏功能，使显示功能更加完善。即使我们的测试装置显示了一些屏幕出血和混浊，这在日常操作中也是难以察觉的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 2510:1 (Black: 0.145 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.92 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 0.95
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.61 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
CCT: 7063 K
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 BOE XS TV140WTM-NHH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD TV140WTM-NH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Schenker Vision 14 CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -1% | 3% | -2% | 1% | 0% | 27% | 10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 65.6 | 67.1 2% | 65.9 0% | 67.8 3% | 64.9 -1% | 66.3 1% | 65.7 0% | 98.6 50% | 75.4 15% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 97.4 | 99.1 2% | 92.8 -5% | 98.3 1% | 94.4 -3% | 97.4 0% | 98.6 1% | 100 3% | 99 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 67.5 | 69 2% | 68.2 1% | 70.1 4% | 66.3 -2% | 68.1 1% | 67.8 0% | 85.9 27% | 76.4 13% |
| Response Times | -12% | -35% | -10% | -22% | -59% | -91% | -11% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 34 ? | 37.6 ? -11% | 43.2 ? -27% | 37.6 ? -11% | 37.6 ? -11% | 52 ? -53% | 59.2 ? -74% | 31 ? 9% | 32.8 ? 4% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20 ? | 22.4 ? -12% | 28.4 ? -42% | 21.6 ? -8% | 26.4 ? -32% | 33 ? -65% | 41.6 ? -108% | 26.1 ? -31% | 20.4 ? -2% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 59520 ? | 27780 ? | 143 ? | 21740 ? | 118000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -41% | -2% | -5% | -6% | -31% | -3% | -8% | -34% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 364 | 458 26% | 457 26% | 419 15% | 502 38% | 344 -5% | 403.4 11% | 417 15% | 390 7% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 367 | 448 22% | 451 23% | 407 11% | 474 29% | 340 -7% | 397 8% | 395 8% | 387 5% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 82 | 89 9% | 93 13% | 93 13% | 89 9% | 88 7% | 89 9% | 91 11% | 94 15% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.145 | 0.25 -72% | 0.26 -79% | 0.23 -59% | 0.33 -128% | 0.13 10% | 0.34 -134% | 0.39 -169% | 0.29 -100% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2510 | 1832 -27% | 1758 -30% | 1822 -27% | 1521 -39% | 2646 5% | 1186 -53% | 1069 -57% | 1345 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 3.4 -77% | 1.9 1% | 1.9 1% | 1.35 30% | 3.29 -71% | 0.94 51% | 1.12 42% | 2.8 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 6.7 -81% | 3.1 16% | 3.6 3% | 3.67 1% | 7.48 -102% | 2.92 21% | 2.71 27% | 4.4 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.95 | 1.7 -79% | 0.9 5% | 1.2 -26% | 1.79 -88% | 0.99 -4% | 0.77 19% | 1.8 -89% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.61 | 4.9 -88% | 2.2 16% | 2.9 -11% | 1.7 35% | 3.25 -25% | 0.9 66% | 1.7 35% | 3.5 -34% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2207 0% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7063 92% | 7704 84% | 6921 94% | 6733 97% | 6440 101% | 6358 102% | 6620 98% | 6870 95% | 6174 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 63.5 | 61.1 | 62.3 | 76.4 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 99.1 | 94.3 | 98.7 | 99 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-27% | -13% /
-7% | -4% /
-4% | -10% /
-7% | -30% /
-28% | -31% /
-15% | 3% /
-1% | -8% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
与制造商的承诺相对应，我们无法测量到任何PWM闪烁。响应时间相当好，但对于快速游戏来说是不够的。但由于有了60-Hz的屏幕和集成图形单元，该设备无论如何都不是一个游戏笔记本电脑，这一点可以忽略。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
华为MateBook 14绝对可以在户外使用，因为它相当明亮。然而，阳光直射仍然对高反射率的显示屏提出了过高要求。你需要至少500cd/m²或更高的亮度来处理。
作为IPS屏幕的典型，华为MateBook 14的可视角度也可以称为非常好。根据我们的经验，只有OLED显示屏才能确保更完美的视角。
性能。快速的英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7被AMD超越了
MateBook 14继续提供四种处理器变体。英特尔酷睿 i5-1135G7, 英特尔酷睿 i7-1165G7(我们的测试单元），以及六核的AMD Ryzen 5 5500U和八核Ryzen 7 5700U.在前辈的AMD机型中，使用了45瓦的CPU，而现在引擎盖下只有低功耗的处理器。
在图形方面也有变化。专用的GPU，如前代的NvidiaGeForce MX350，不再使用了。所以英特尔的Xe G7或 AMD的RX Vega在这里已经足够了。8或16GB的DDR4-3200内存被焊接在一起。这意味着华为MateBook 14没有使用更高效的LPDDR4x内存，顺便说一下，在AIDA64内存基准测试中，LPDDR4x内存的速度也高达77%。这也导致了iGPU的一些好处，在 MateBook X Pro例如，在MateBook X Pro上。存储解决方案是一个M.2-2280 PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD。
处理器
我们测试单元的四核处理器是英特尔 酷睿i7-1165G7时钟速度在2.8和4.4GHz之间。在我们的Cinebench-R15循环中，该处理器以4x4 GHz的速度启动，消耗功率为40瓦。一秒钟后，下降到3.6 GHz，消耗32瓦。甚至在一分钟之前，它就开始在3.5和4.6GHz之间周期性地变化，有一些罕见地下降到2GHz。在整个测试循环期间，平均为3.6GHz，耗电33瓦，这是一个非常好的结果。在这段时间内，核心温度上升到90℃以上（194°F）。
有了这个， 前辈被超越了66%。采用AMD六核CPU的同胞模型又快了40%，而八核的 Ryzen 7 5700U应该是这里的标准。配备M1芯片的MacBook AirM1芯片 在虚拟化的Cinebench基准测试中快了约10%。然而，在原生应用程序中，差异会大得多。
总体而言，MateBook 14的性能非常好，在测试过程中只下降了10%。在电池运行中，性能只下降了5%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry -1! | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 -6! | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=71, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3933 - 8184, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (17720 - 34369, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (958 - 2338, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (44161 - 50624, n=58) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3183 - 4796, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11876 - 20468, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (29506 - 73387, n=58) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (169 - 402, n=65) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2033 - 4461, n=58) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=58) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果处于良好水平，与前代产品相比，显示出近50%的改进。即使是微软的Surface Laptop 3，采用英特尔第10代CPU，在这里仍然远远落后。
主观的系统性能非常迅速，但采用AMD处理器的系统感觉甚至略微迅捷，例如，在打开多个Windows和应用程序时。然而 MacBook Air M1在这方面是没有对手的，主观上该操作系统的一切运行都没有任何延迟，包括浏览器。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 7883, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10842, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1341 - 1477, n=4) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1430 - 1492, n=4) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1237 - 1483, n=4) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1273 - 1414, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4972 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (20032 - 65446, n=58) | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (23033 - 64524, n=58) | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21736 - 66791, n=58) | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (69 - 110, n=65) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
LatencyMon报告说，MateBook 14也适合于无损的实时音频和视频处理。这是一个非常好的结果，也与AMD机型共享。在以4K质量重现Youtube视频时，没有任何问题，我们只注意到在此期间CPU负载略高。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Schenker Vision 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
内置的三星PM991 PCIe 3.0 NVMe固态硬盘采用M.2-2280格式，提供512GB的存储空间。它的速度几乎在所有情况下都相当令人失望，而前辈提供的SSD速度明显更快。
Schenker Vision中的PCIe 4.0 SSD是迄今为止最快的。然而，华为在这里进行了非常严格的分区，所以最初只有70GB的空间在C分区，其余的都在D分区。你可以在我们的数据库中找到其他的SSD比较在我们的数据库中。
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD Vega 7, R5 5500U, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q | Schenker Vision 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 10% | 20% | 35% | 52% | 37% | -54% | 127% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s (MB/s) | 985 | 765 -22% | 1115 13% | 1629 65% | 712 -28% | 368.4 -63% | 1859 89% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s (MB/s) | 357.4 | 237.6 -34% | 376.3 5% | 734 105% | 257.3 -28% | 256.1 -28% | 994 178% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s (MB/s) | 1246 | 1600 28% | 1512 21% | 2065 66% | 1513 21% | 764 -39% | 2100 69% | ||
| Score Total (Points) | 2864 | 3059 7% | 3779 32% | 4102 43% | 5392 88% | 4811 68% | 1520 -47% | 7939 177% | |
| Score Write (Points) | 1165 | 1328 14% | 1878 61% | 1899 63% | 2219 90% | 2145 84% | 525 -55% | 2677 130% | |
| Score Read (Points) | 1131 | 1206 7% | 1264 12% | 1480 31% | 2108 86% | 1776 57% | 678 -40% | 3512 211% | |
| Access Time Write * (ms) | 0.023 | 0.028 -22% | 0.024 -4% | 0.026 -13% | 0.073 -217% | 0.02 13% | 0.093 -304% | 0.02 13% | |
| Access Time Read * (ms) | 0.099 | 0.046 54% | 0.033 67% | 0.029 71% | 0.037 63% | 0.105 -6% | 0.055 44% | 0.025 75% | |
| 4K-64 Write (MB/s) | 872 | 1099 26% | 1553 78% | 1502 72% | 1800 106% | 1698 95% | 354.9 -59% | 2077 138% | |
| 4K-64 Read (MB/s) | 907 | 856 -6% | 998 10% | 1131 25% | 1768 95% | 1428 57% | 497.4 -45% | 2938 224% | |
| 4K Write (MB/s) | 163.5 | 147.6 -10% | 154.5 -6% | 186.9 14% | 180.8 11% | 199.2 22% | 120 -27% | 205 25% | |
| 4K Read (MB/s) | 50 | 56.6 13% | 53.3 7% | 53 6% | 60.7 21% | 52.7 5% | 42.35 -15% | 83.8 68% | |
| Seq Write (MB/s) | 1292 | 810 -37% | 1706 32% | 2098 62% | 2385 85% | 2474 91% | 504 -61% | 3952 206% | |
| Seq Read (MB/s) | 1744 | 2933 68% | 2130 22% | 2961 70% | 2794 60% | 2955 69% | 1387 -20% | 4899 181% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
对于图形，华为MateBook 14使用集成的 英特尔Xe G7 (96EUs).一般来说，这并不坏，因为根据基准和游戏的不同， GeForce MX350甚至比英特尔的集成解决方案更慢，特别是当英特尔Xe G7与四通道LPDDR4x内存相结合时。
然而，这正是一点问题的根源，因为在合成基准中，这里使用的DDR4-3200内存显示的性能与MateBook 14s的LPDDR4x内存相比，降低了20-30%。 MateBook 14s和MateBook X Pro。你可以在我们的GPU数据库中与其他GPU进行比较。.
在电池运行中，全部图形性能仍然可用。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6067 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16099 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3411 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1421 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
我们的游戏测试表明，LPDDR4x可以使性能提高73%，用 英特尔Xe G7 (96EUs)，同时也把 Nvidia的GeForce MX350在许多游戏中的表现。的RX Vega 7在华为Mate 14 2021的AMD型号中，其表现往往与英特尔型号持平。
当我们把它与Apple's M1 MacBook Air在"古墓丽影 "中，我们发现MateBook 14的图形性能相当相似，但由于其操作系统，MacBook无法提供大量游戏选择。
一般来说，如果你还想享受现代游戏，你只能在低细节水平上玩这些游戏。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 76.2 | 58.9 | 17.2 | 6.54 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 59.2 | 43.7 | 20.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 75.8 | 65.1 | 40.6 | 38 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31.6 | 16.7 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.5 | 35.1 | 31 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 20 | 18 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 65.3 | 25.2 | 21.7 | 17.6 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 40 | 26 | 25 |
排放物。基本上安静的MateBook甚至不会让人感到手热
噪声排放
在简单的网络和办公任务中，这两个小风扇仍然完全关闭。然而，在相当慢的CPU负载约为15%的情况下，例如在复制大量数据时，风扇已经开始运行，尽管它们听起来并不令人讨厌。在更高的或综合的负载下，风扇开始转动起来，其噪音可能会更烦人，特别是由于一些高频噪音。AMD的型号在这里更安静。
总的来说，噪音水平与去年的上一代产品相似。联想Yoga Slim 7又明显更安静，而MacBook Air M1仍然完全无声，因为它没有风扇。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.4 / 40.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD Vega 7, R5 5500U, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q | Schenker Vision 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -12% | 5% | -2% | 3% | 5% | -6% | -3% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 29.3 -17% | 24.1 4% | 24.3 3% | 25.4 -2% | 26 -4% | 28.5 -14% | 25 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 29.3 -17% | 24.1 4% | 24.3 3% | 25.6 -2% | 26 -4% | 28.5 -14% | 25 -0% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 29.3 -17% | 24.1 4% | 24.3 3% | 25.6 -2% | 26 -4% | 28.5 -14% | 25 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25 | 30.8 -23% | 24.1 4% | 28.4 -14% | 25.6 -2% | 26 -4% | 28.5 -14% | 26.9 -8% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 35.4 | 35.7 -1% | 31.8 10% | 31.7 10% | 28.7 19% | 30.2 15% | 28.5 19% | 38.6 -9% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 40.2 | 37.9 6% | 38.1 5% | 46.8 -16% | 38.2 5% | 29 28% | 40.4 -0% | 41.2 -2% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 35.7 | 34.6 | 31.7 | 32 | 40.4 | 41.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华为MateBook 14 2021总体上是一个非常安静的设备，即使在综合压力测试中，机箱顶部也没有任何区域变得甚至手热。由于风扇朝后面吹，也没有热气流的问题。
然而，在不切实际的高负载下，在CPU区域的底部可能会出现47°C（117°F）的热点，但这在你的腿上还不会感到不舒服。在这方面，竞争对手也没有做得更好，AMD Ryzen导致了类似的热量发展。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU | Schenker Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -0% | 2% | 5% | -4% | -0% | -0% | 2% | -14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40 | 44 -10% | 42.8 -7% | 41.1 -3% | 42.2 -6% | 40 -0% | 42.6 -7% | 44 -10% | 46.2 -16% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47.1 | 51.3 -9% | 48.8 -4% | 45.4 4% | 40.4 14% | 43.3 8% | 45.4 4% | 44 7% | 52.2 -11% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.7 | 25.1 9% | 25.2 9% | 25.3 9% | 31.2 -13% | 28.4 -3% | 27.2 2% | 27 3% | 30.6 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.7 | 26.1 9% | 25.9 10% | 26.5 8% | 32.2 -12% | 30.4 -6% | 28.8 -0% | 27 6% | 33.6 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在我们的综合压力测试（Prime 95 + FurMark）中，英特尔CPU的速度为2.1 GHz，这表明有明显的节流现象。然而，在日常操作中，你不会长时间遇到这种苛刻的情况。CPU在66 °C（151 °F）时保持低温，在此期间，英特尔Xe G7（96 EUs）的时钟速度为1150 MHz。
在纯粹的CPU压力下，CPU仍然保持3.1GHz的时钟速度，核心温度平均上升到81℃（178°F）。在这两项测试中，消耗量增加到32瓦，而初始峰值（PL2）的最大值为56瓦。
发言人
虽然中音和高音清晰而线性，但几乎没有任何低音。笔记本电脑的典型使用情况所需的音量在大多数时候都可以达到。
然而，声音频谱总体上是非常尖锐和单薄的。有时，这甚至可以走到简单的声音已经听起来失真和遥远。这显然限制了对各种音频的享受，但这也可能是我们测试设备的缺陷。
在任何情况下，你肯定应该通过音频端口或蓝牙使用耳机。
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理。华为无法保持低消耗
消耗功率
待机功耗为0.4瓦，承诺在未使用时有较长的续航时间，然后才需要再次充电。另一方面，在我们测试领域的所有华为设备中，空闲运行时的功耗都有所增加。联想的超薄Yoga 7在这方面做得明显更好，微软的Surface Laptop 3和Apple's MacBook Air M1也更有效率。
负载下的消耗值约为40瓦，这意味着MateBook 14 2021保持在平均范围内，而对于拥有专用图形或更强大CPU的设备来说，负载下的数值相应更高。由于Apple's M1 ARM SoC，MacBook Air在负载下也保持了极高的效率。
65瓦的USB-C充电器足以为MateBook提供电力，即使会出现一些短暂的消费高峰，大约66瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.42 / 0.4 Watt |
| Idle | 4.7 / 9.1 / 10.1 Watt |
| Load |
39 / 66 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Schenker Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -2% | -7% | -5% | 29% | 7% | 42% | -34% | -8% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.7 | 3 36% | 4.2 11% | 4.4 6% | 6.7 -43% | 3.3 30% | 4.4 6% | 1.9 60% | 9.8 -109% | 5.51 ? -17% | 4.12 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.1 | 9 1% | 10.3 -13% | 8.7 4% | 10 -10% | 5 45% | 7.5 18% | 6.4 30% | 12.5 -37% | 8.66 ? 5% | 7.01 ? 23% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 10.1 | 11 -9% | 10.7 -6% | 9.6 5% | 10.3 -2% | 7.5 26% | 7.8 23% | 7 31% | 13.7 -36% | 10.9 ? -8% | 8.63 ? 15% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 39 | 60.8 -56% | 39.4 -1% | 46 -18% | 35.7 8% | 28 28% | 41.9 -7% | 25 36% | 39.3 -1% | 45.6 ? -17% | 44.7 ? -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 40.1 | 56 -40% | 38.7 3% | 42.2 -5% | 32.7 18% | 28.8 28% | 40.8 -2% | 44.8 -12% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 66 | 65.6 1% | 67.7 -3% | 87.6 -33% | 67.6 -2% | 56 15% | 63.9 3% | 30.3 54% | 72.8 -10% | 67.8 ? -3% | 68.6 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
电池寿命结果有点让人失望。虽然前辈在WLAN测试中仍能持续近13个小时，但56瓦时的电池现在只能勉强维持9:22小时，这与AMD版本仅有一分钟的差别。总的来说，这是一个平均价值。
除了微软的 Surface Laptop 3和 Schenker Vision 14所有的对比设备在这里都表现得比较好，其中以Apple's MacBook Air M1为首，在150cd/m²亮度的WLAN测试中运行时间为16小时。 在快速充电模式下，MateBook 14的电池可以在略高于2小时的时间内完全充电。
| Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 56 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60.7 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh | Schenker Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 32% | 2% | 8% | 35% | 24% | -6% | 70% | -30% | 42% | |
| H.264 (h) | 8.9 | 13.9 56% | 9.2 3% | 11.6 30% | 6.7 -25% | 16.5 ? 85% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.4 | 12.8 36% | 9.4 0% | 10.3 10% | 10.5 12% | 11.7 24% | 8.3 -12% | 16 70% | 6.1 -35% | 13.2 ? 40% |
| Load (h) | 1.9 | 2 5% | 1.6 -16% | 3 58% | 1.9 0% | 1.924 ? 1% | ||||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 19.5 | 34.4 | 30.7 ? |
Pros
Cons
裁决。超极本粉丝选择AMD还是Apple
华为MateBook 14 2021绝对是一款非常紧凑的超极本，拥有足够大的显示屏，采用方便工作的3：2格式。显示屏的反射是一个轻微的缺点，即使光泽的屏幕使颜色更加突出。尽管有高质量的铝制外壳，但重量还是有点高。 触摸板非常好，键盘也绝对可用。然而，除了Thunderbolt之外，我们还错过了32GB工作内存的选项。
由Notebooksbilliger.de提供给我们的英特尔子笔记本的性能处于良好的水平，但在这里真的没有很好的理由让人喜欢英特尔而不是AMD。AMD机型提供相同的电池寿命，更明亮的显示屏（也可选择无触摸屏），大幅提高性能，甚至保持更安静。此外，它还便宜100至150欧元（约108美元-162美元），这取决于销售情况。
有了华为MateBook 14，你就得到了一个高质量的、也是负担得起的超极本，并具有相当大的性能。然而，我们建议选择AMD机型。
回到我们最初的问题：是MacBook还是Windows笔记本电脑当然是个人偏好，操作系统也是一个决定性的因素。对于那些不依赖只有Windows系统的软件的人，我们也可以推荐 MacBook Air M1毫无疑义。它速度极快、安静、凉爽，并提供了非常高的质量和非常体面的输入设备。而且显示屏和它的扬声器系统一样都是一流的。此外，在WLAN测试中，约16小时的电池寿命几乎没有对手，而它的价格仍然相对实惠，约900欧元（约973美元）。
价格低廉的，联想Yoga Slim 7 ，在几乎所有方面也是一个值得竞争的对象，只要它不使用16:9的显示屏。但令人惊讶的是，超极本在中档Windows笔记本电脑领域的桂冠被申克公司的Vision 14 。那些可以忍受较差的电池寿命的人将会对这款轻巧的、1公斤（约2.2磅）的超极本（包括其16:10格式的哑光90-Hz显示屏）感到最满意。
价格和可用性
虽然华为MateBook 14 2021在许多国家可以从Huawei在许多国家有售，但在美国还没有正式上市，只能从全球供应商那里在线找到。
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7
- 04/12/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor
Price comparison
