Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

Qualcomm X2-90

高通公司的Adreno X2-90是最快的骁龙X2精英(至尊)系统芯片中的一款快速集成显卡,时钟频率高达1850 MHz。

Adreno iGPU 支持 DirectX 12.2 Ultimate、Vulkan 1.4 和 OpenCL 3.0。据高通公司称,还对光线追踪进行了改进(硬件支持)。

根据高通公司的说法,iPU 的速度是上一代骁龙 X SoC 的 2.3 倍。然而,在此之前,驱动程序支持和游戏支持并不理想,这意味着许多当前的游戏无法在 Windows 下运行,或者只能在有限的范围内运行。

该 SoC 采用台积电的现代 3NP 工艺生产,效率应该不错。

iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Core Speed1850 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Man. Technology3 nm
Date of Announcement29.09.2025
CPU in X2-90GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-10018 x 3600 MHz, 82 W? MHz1850 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-94-10018 x 3600 MHz, 82 W? MHz1850 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-90-10018 x 3400 MHz? MHz1700 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-10018 x 3400 MHz? MHz1700 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1700 - 1850 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 384     avg: 469.5     median: 469.5 (3%)     max: 555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1095     avg: 1180     median: 1179.5 (8%)     max: 1264 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 4123     avg: 5094     median: 5188.5 (12%)     max: 5687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 21285     avg: 22844     median: 22640 (9%)     max: 24809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 9530     avg: 10335     median: 10334.5 (16%)     max: 11139 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9974     avg: 10904     median: 10904 (10%)     max: 11834 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4098     avg: 4316     median: 4315.5 (11%)     max: 4533 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3666     avg: 3865     median: 3865 (8%)     max: 4064 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -97%
...
3399 -12%
3430 -11%
3492 -10%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 -9%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 -8%
3601 -7%
3650 -6%
3689 -5%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3719 -4%
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
3865
3883 0%
3910 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3960 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
4155 8%
4209 9%
4256 10%
4372 13%
4448 15%
4546 18%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 502%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 1040%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11814     avg: 12780     median: 12780 (15%)     max: 13746 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11821     avg: 12834     median: 12834 (10%)     max: 13847 Points
171.8 -99%
...
11915 -7%
12066 -6%
12289 -4%
12294 -4%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
12334 -4%
12479 -3%
12583 -2%
12797 0%
12801 0%
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
12834
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 3%
13515 5%
13524 5%
13581 6%
13714 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 10%
14147 10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 11%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 12%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 432%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 911%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 42419     avg: 44987     median: 44987 (13%)     max: 47555 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 42821     avg: 44651     median: 44651 (24%)     max: 46481 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
39319 -12%
40134 -10%
40146 -10%
40643 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 -5%
42967 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 -3%
43587 -2%
44188 -1%
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
44651
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 2%
45988 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 4%
46945 5%
47209 6%
47227 6%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
49135 10%
49207 10%
51344 15%
...
132443 197%
max:
173912 289%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 23721     avg: 24201     median: 24201 (32%)     max: 24681 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6799     avg: 9795     median: 9795 (7%)     max: 12791 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.6     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (2%)     max: 30.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 39874     avg: 41733     median: 41732.5 (11%)     max: 43591 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 46657     avg: 49241     median: 49241 (12%)     max: 51825 points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10728 points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.8     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (7%)     max: 59.5 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 56.9     avg: 61.1     median: 61.1 (17%)     max: 65.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.4     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (6%)     max: 58.2 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.562     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.841 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
23 27 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
159.5 185.9 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113 132.8 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83.6 99.3 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.1 84.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
48.5 61.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.7 50.1 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9 43 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
32.7
26.4
low 1920x1080
50.9 60 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.2 49.1 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.5 43.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.8 42.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109 128 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 56 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 51 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 46 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
237 279 ~ 258 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2 115.3 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.9 89.2 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.9 81.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
67 68 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 58 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 50 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
53.2 54.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.7 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.5 42.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
89.7 110.5 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5 65.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 34.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
102.7 103.5 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.3 86.3 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.2 80.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.4 70.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
142.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
134.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74 90.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.1 41.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin's Creed Shadows25242015
Total War Pharaoh173123917858.9
Cyberpunk 20775546393522.7
Baldur's Gate 35545393928.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11952474331
Strange Brigade258103837559
Far Cry 56856534945
X-Plane 11.11544843
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark100613326.7
Dota 2 Reborn103867970
GTA V142.9134.5823728.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3
4
3
1
5
3
2
1
6
4
1
5
3
4
4




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 25. 17:57:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Apr 2026 05:27:59 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13261 +0.02s ... 0.03s

#8 got single benchmarks 13261 +0.013s ... 0.043s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.203s ... 1.246s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.246s

#12 Got 180 rows for game benchmarks. +0.043s ... 1.289s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.289s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 1.296s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.208s ... 1.504s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.344s ... 1.848s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.848s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 graphics card

高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司面向 Windows 的第二代 ARM 处理器已经面世,我们将新的 Snapdragon X2 Elite 和 Elite Extreme 与 AMD、Apple 以及英特尔的竞争产品进行了比较。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, X2-90, 14", 992 g
华硕 Zenbook A14 笔记本电脑评测--骁龙 X2 Elite 对决 MacBook Air M5

华硕 Zenbook A14 笔记本电脑评测--骁龙 X2 Elite 对决 MacBook Air M5

新款华硕 Zenbook A14 是首批采用高通公司最新骁龙 X2 Elite ARM 处理器的设备之一。A14 再次配备了 OLED 屏幕和铝制机身,重量仍不足 1 千克,CPU 性能轻松击败英特尔和 AMD。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, X2-90, 14", 992 g
高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司面向 Windows 的第二代 ARM 处理器已经面世,我们将新的 Snapdragon X2 Elite 和 Elite Extreme 与 AMD、Apple 以及英特尔的竞争产品进行了比较。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, X2-90
高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

高通公司面向 Windows 的第二代 ARM 处理器已经面世,我们将新的 Snapdragon X2 Elite 和 Elite Extreme 与 AMD、Apple 以及英特尔的竞争产品进行了比较。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, X2-90
华硕 Zenbook A16 笔记本电脑评测 - X2 Elite Extreme 和 48 GB 内存,售价 1599 美元

华硕 Zenbook A16 笔记本电脑评测 - X2 Elite Extreme 和 48 GB 内存,售价 1599 美元

新款华硕 Zenbook 是一款 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,重量极轻,仅有 1.2 千克。它也是首款配备高通公司全新骁龙 X2 Elite Extreme 处理器(18 个 CPU 内核)和全新 Adreno X2-90 GPU 的笔记本电脑。此外,它还配备了 120 Hz OLED 显示屏和 48 GB 内存,售价 1599 美元。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-94-100, X2-90, 16", 1.2 kg

Asus Zenbook A16 UX3607: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-94-100, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

  Review » 高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

  Review » 高通公司 Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme 分析、基准测试和效率 -Apple 的劲敌,AMD 和英特尔的难题

Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407NA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407NA

Asus Zenbook A16 UX3607OA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook A16 UX3607OA

HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (2026): unknown, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra 14 2026

Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, 14.00", 1 kg
   » 搭载骁龙 X2 Elite 的华硕 Zenbook A14 是完美的移动伴侣

Asus Zenbook A16 UX3607: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-94-100, 16.00", 1.2 kg
   » 16 英寸华硕 Zenbook A16 功能强大,1.2 千克的重量几乎无可匹敌

Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, 14.00", 1 kg
   » 高通公司的骁龙X2精英版让英特尔和AMD望尘莫及,即使在低功耗限制下也是如此

Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores: Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100, 0.00"
   » 高通公司骁龙 X2 精英系列:适用于 ARM 笔记本电脑的全新顶级 SoC 概览和基准测试

   » 高通公司骁龙 X2 精英系列:适用于 ARM 笔记本电脑的全新顶级 SoC 概览和基准测试

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter