Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

采用Max-Q设计的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650是基于Turing架构(TU117芯片)的移动图形卡。与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1650没有集成Raytracing或Tensor内核。与台式机版本相比,移动版和Max-Q版使用了TU117芯片的所有1024个着色器。它是为轻薄型笔记本电脑设计的,性能比普通的笔记本电脑GTX 1650差10-15%(取决于散热能力)。根据规格,Max-Q型号的基频低20%,睿频低27%。

性能应该比旧的GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q强一点。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,也对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令增加高达50%,能耗提高40%。

与较大的Turing芯片(例如GTX 1660 Ti的TU116和RTX系列)相比,TU117不包括新的NVENC编码器,而是较旧的类似于Pascal和Volta中使用的编码器。

Nvidia规定功耗为35瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比笔记本电脑的正常版(Max-P)1650低15瓦。因此,Max-Q型号非常适合轻薄笔记本电脑。 TU117芯片采用台积电12nm FFN工艺制成。

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G0 / N18P-G61
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Core Speed1020 - 1245 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth112.1 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology12 nm
PCIe3.0
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.5 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.12 -12%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.13 -12%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.16 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.34 -6%
3.34 -6%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.34 -6%
3.4 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.52 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.53 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.54
3.59 1%
3.61 2%
3.85 9%
3.86 9%
3.9 10%
3.98 12%
4.05 14%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.2 19%
4.22 19%
...
21.1 496%
max:
33.3 841%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2859     avg: 3130     median: 3070 (9%)     max: 3494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2836     avg: 2998     median: 3016 (8%)     max: 3238 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2472 -18%
2601 -13%
2667 -11%
2766 -8%
2805 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -6%
2864 -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -3%
2993 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998
3074 3%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 3%
3123 4%
3132 4%
3139 5%
3160 5%
3269 9%
3324 11%
3364 12%
...
19434 548%
max:
36485 1117%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 370469     avg: 377330     median: 373879 (42%)     max: 391093 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 40461     avg: 62256     median: 59656 (8%)     max: 86650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14259     avg: 20728     median: 20883 (22%)     max: 29013 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 21759     avg: 39625     median: 45243.5 (12%)     max: 53981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6300     avg: 7026     median: 7004.5 (12%)     max: 7784 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6985     avg: 7853     median: 7779 (9%)     max: 8618 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 40513     avg: 68009     median: 64975.5 (8%)     max: 101571 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9381     avg: 10635     median: 10471 (15%)     max: 11966 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10248     avg: 11171     median: 11082.5 (10%)     max: 12259 Points
171.8 -98%
...
10005 -10%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -8%
10498 -6%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -5%
10730 -4%
10748 -4%
10952 -2%
11119 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11171
11305 1%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 3%
11795 6%
11796 6%
11823 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 6%
11915 7%
12066 8%
12196 9%
...
59943 437%
max:
106023 849%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
30957 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
33321 Points (19%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 -10%
30252 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 -6%
31800 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 -3%
32473 -3%
32473 -3%
33179 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33321
33740 1%
33810 1%
34450 3%
34680 4%
34951 5%
35209 6%
35286 6%
35807 7%
36214 9%
...
132443 297%
max:
170928 413%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 31487     avg: 32041     median: 32040.5 (42%)     max: 32594 Points
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
53 fps (14%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
33.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
22.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
88.2 fps (10%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
68.9 fps (10%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
53.9 fps (6%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
71.3 fps (12%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5121     avg: 5968     median: 5967.5 (4%)     max: 6814 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
76.1 fps (26%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 85.3     avg: 110     median: 108.1 (6%)     max: 143.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
154.2 fps (17%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1589 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3068 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5833 points (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 60     avg: 71.7     median: 73 (16%)     max: 90.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3818     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (43%)     max: 0.485 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 25.2     avg: 38.8     median: 39.8 (64%)     max: 44.7 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1350     avg: 1378     median: 1389 (54%)     max: 1395 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
114.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
54.4 56.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.1 43.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5 29.3 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 18.6 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
50.4 57.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.3 49.7 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.6 44.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
67.6 68.9 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.6 52.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 46.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.2 40.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
85 94.1 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.8 59 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.1 49.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4 40.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
92.4 121.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60 65.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.6 53.4 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.2 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63 75 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41 43 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
150 198.6 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118 127.9 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115 121.5 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114 117.7 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86 103.1 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.5 53.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.2 34.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
102.8 120 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.1 39.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.3 29.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83 84 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65 69 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41 46 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
150.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 46.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6 39.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.8 38.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
60.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.2 56.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7 36.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 19.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51 56 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30 32 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
154  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64 81.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.1 68.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.7 38.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
51.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.6 49.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.9 42.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3 34.9 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
39 72 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 52 53 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20 49 50 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 46 46 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
73.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.4 36.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6 22.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
143.9 144 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.7 71.1 78.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.6 58.4 59.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.3 57 59.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
med. 1920x1080
53.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
112  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
med. 1920x1080
195  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
179  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
173  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
124  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
92 105 113 117 151 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 48 51 53 56 58 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34 39 42 43 47 51 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 34 35 38 41 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 91 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 52 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 48 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21 45 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
414.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
69 83.5 88.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57.2 62 77.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.8 52.1 64.4 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
51.7 91.2 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.7 41.7 45.7 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.1 29.4 33.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.7 9.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
72.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
med. 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
84.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
196 216.1 247.2 249.4 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128 128.2 138.1 193.9 222.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.5 88 97.8 131 145.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
193.4
248.8
Prey

Prey

2017
med. 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
48.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
med. 1920x1080
66.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1920x1080
54.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Doom

Doom

2016
high 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
134.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
93  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.2 86.2 120 132.5 158.2 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76.5 85.6 105 120.1 130.9 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71.2 81.6 94 110.8 128 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.4 68.3 88 101.7 105.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
137.5 141.5 144.6 146 147 155.4 156.1 168 188 196 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.2 84.9 87.2 92 93.6 94.1 99 114.8 119.8 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.5 46.3 48.1 48.7 50 53.2 54.3 54.8 56.3 60.4 65.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.5 28.1 28.8 30.1 30.4 30.4 30.7 30.8 33 34.4 36.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.5 17.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
162.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
142.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
230.7 259.1 286.7 296.3 317.2 323.6 ~ 286 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
186.6 196.1 208.1 215.1 231.2 238.3 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
169.3 172.2 182 188.4 206.8 215.2 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.2 70.3 72 72.7 77 81.7 84.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
367.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
253.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
191.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
309.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
294.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
258.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
166.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hunt Showdown114.845.635.3
Red Dead Redemption 255422817
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order54454212.7
Need for Speed Heat68514539
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201990574740
GRID 2019107635136
Ghost Recon Breakpoint69424025
FIFA 20174123118116
Borderlands 395523426
Control1113828
F1 20191278467443520
Total War: Three Kingdoms150.152.431.923
Rage 210345383722.47.4
Anno 180060.455351913.88.4
The Division 282544331209
Dirt Rally 2.015473603523.1
Anthem51.347423322.613.1
Far Cry New Dawn564240373216
Metro Exodus73.336272216.49.9
Apex Legends14473585739.721.9
Just Cause 45942.639.726.213.2
Darksiders III67.453.447.129.39.7
Battlefield V63.654.149.336.119.4
Farming Simulator 191368460.640.7
Hitman 253.147.644.428.614.1
Call of Duty Black Ops 462.758.550.932.710.9
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey494120178
Forza Horizon 4112746955
FIFA 1919517917312464.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1165243382412
Monster Hunter World46.340.131.419.28.9
The Crew 259.349.14226.413
Far Cry 569383533
World of Tanks enCore414.6160.159.4
X-Plane 11.11806656
Kingdom Come: Deliverance48.13826.418.59.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark71412923.49
Fortnite13879.959.136.210.9
Star Wars Battlefront 272.262.346.529.45.6
Need for Speed Payback72.361.858.938.619.1
ELEX61.148.637.324.512.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of War64473514
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)84.670.852.616.6
Rocket League22716211042.7
Prey97.577.367.123.6
Ghost Recon Wildlands48.544.421.714.6
For Honor66.863.849.419.1
Resident Evil 714678.865.221.5
Dishonored 253.944.821.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided4322.914.1
Mirror's Edge Catalyst54.749.917.5
Overwatch11969.539.1
Doom79.677.423.9
Ashes of the Singularity60.342.536.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider134.69350.941.718.3
Rainbow Six Siege11510140
World of Warships179144.1117.7104.2
Dota 2 Reborn1121049786
Batman: Arkham Knight121756438
The Witcher 315897533118
GTA V162.7142.876.536
BioShock Infinite28621318975
Tomb Raider367.2253.9191.592.7
Counter-Strike: GO309.6294.4258.6166.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
18
15

26
20
12
4
35
20
4
10
35
11
2
17
8

1
36
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 09:22:46

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.035s ... 0.037s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.038s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 9834 +0.027s ... 0.065s

#17 got single benchmarks 9834 +0.058s ... 0.123s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.123s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.627s ... 0.751s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.751s

#21 Got 471 rows for game benchmarks. +0.041s ... 0.792s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.792s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.045s ... 0.837s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +2.567s ... 3.404s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 3.41s

#26 return log +0s ... 3.41s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card

华硕ZenBook 15 UX534FTC笔记本电脑评测:雾面屏续航王者

华硕ZenBook 15 UX534FTC笔记本电脑评测:雾面屏续航王者

华硕为这款超薄笔记本电脑配备了四核处理器和独立显卡。 其他方面的功能也很出色:雾面IPS屏幕,NVMe SSD,16 GB RAM(双通道),背光键盘。 最重要的是,出色的续航时间使它更加完美。...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60" | 1.6 kg
联想IdeaPad S740-15IRH笔记本电脑评测:最贵最好的IdeaPad

联想IdeaPad S740-15IRH笔记本电脑评测:最贵最好的IdeaPad

尽管IdeaPad的名称通常与廉价的入门级到中档产品挂钩,但IdeaPad S740无疑是其家族中最豪华,功能最强大的。最大的特点是,它的价格几乎与Dell XPS 15或HP Spectre x360 15差不多。...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60" | 1.9 kg
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC

MSI GF63 Thin 9SC笔记本电脑评测:不到1000刀的轻薄游戏本

虽然廉价游戏笔记本电脑经常难以流畅的运行游戏,但在大多数情况下,光性价比而言是不错的。 微星的GF63 Thin 9SC是该类别下相当实惠的代表。...
Intel Core i5-9300H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
联想IdeaPad S540-15IWL笔记本电脑评测:只有一个真正缺点的全能本

联想IdeaPad S540-15IWL笔记本电脑评测:只有一个真正缺点的全能本

15英寸全能本在优雅纤巧的铝制外壳中配备了GTX 1650 Max-Q,并在测试中具有许多积极的价值,从而引起了人们的注意。例如明亮的高对比度显示屏和快速的SSD。但是,它也显示出明显的弱点。...
Intel Core i7-8565U | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60" | 1.9 kg

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PH: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PH

MSI GV15 Thin 11SC-633: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GV15 Thin 11SC-633

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R6BZ: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R6BZ

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R9Q5: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R9Q5

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6069T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6069T

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN150T : Intel Core i7-10870H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN150T

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN024T: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN024T

Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30007GE: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30007GE

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX564PH-EZ007R: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX564PH-EZ007R

MSI GF63 Thin 10SC-206: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SC-206

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6034T-BE: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6034T-BE

MSI Prestige 15 A11SCX-019XES: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SCX-019XES

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-014: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-014

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, 13.40", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20QV000WGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20QV000WGE

Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5

MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000KUS: Intel Core i7-9850H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000KUS

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CEGE: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CEGE

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CMGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CMGE

Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-029NL: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-029NL

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-044XES: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-044XES

MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-004NL: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-004NL

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-060XES: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-060XES

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000UGE: Intel Core i5-9300H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000UGE

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8078R: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8078R

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-A8145T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-A8145T

MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-011: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-011

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000WGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000WGE

MSI GF63 9SC-662: Intel Core i5-9300H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 9SC-662

MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U

Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL 81SW001SMH: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL 81SW001SMH

MSI GF75 Thin 9SC-039XES: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » MSI GF75 Thin 9SC-039XES

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT, i7-8565U

MSI PS63 8SC-003NL: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI PS63 8SC-003NL

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01-22)