Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

基于Navi 14芯片(新的RDNA架构)并以7nm工艺制造的中端移动图形卡。芯片提供了24个CU(= 1,536个着色器),比类似名称的移动Radeon RX 5500M和台式机RX 5500多2个CU。但是,在Pro中,GPU和内存的频率降低了很多,它配备于具有4或8 GB GDDR6图形内存的2019 Apple MacBook Pro 16高端机型。

Navi 14芯片使用了新的RDNA(Radeon DNA)微体系结构,它是GCN指令集的后继产品。它具有新的处理器设计,多级缓存层次结构和改进的渲染管线,并支持GDDR6内存。

据说Pro 5500M的性能是旧Radeon RX 560X(前身)的2.1倍。尽管比Radeon RX 5500M多了两个CU,但是根据AMD的说法,频率的降低导致峰值性能降低了13%(4个对比4.6 TFLOPS)。因此,在Windows下的游戏中,游戏性能应略低于Radeon RX 5500M,这比Pro 560X(Alpha 15 vs MBP15 2019)强约1.9倍。与Nvidia GPU相比,性能应该在GeForce GTX 1650和GeForce GTX 1060之间。

相似的RX 5500M芯片的TDP为85瓦,因此比频率较低的Radeon RX5300M高20瓦。在游戏中,芯片的功耗介于64到105瓦之间(使用HWInfo64记录的Ghost Recon游戏)。但是,根据AMD,Pro 5500M的额定TGP为50瓦,因此可能使用的是特挑的芯片。

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon Pro 5000M Series
Radeon Pro 5500M 1536 @ 1300 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon Pro 5300M 1280 @ 1250 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
CodenameNavi 14
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1300 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8192 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12, Shader 6.4
Transistor Count6400 Million
technology7 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.0b, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90 decode)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement13.11.2019

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
3629 Points (25%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
3364 Points (22%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
364184 Points (67%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
30690 Points (46%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
65776 Points (34%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
9196 Points (31%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
10399 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
14097 points (37%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
14725 points (29%)
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M -2%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 10%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
42.7 fps (27%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
94.7 fps (39%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
59 fps (29%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
254 fps (44%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
210 fps (48%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
53.5 fps (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
103 Watt (23%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
970 MHz (51%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
84.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Hearthstone

Hearthstone

2020
low 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
97.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
ultra 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
124  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
41.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
139  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
174  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare