Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5080 Laptop是一款高端笔记本显卡,在 2025 年的 CES 上亮相,并于 2025 年 4 月上市销售。

架构

GeForce RTX 5080 移动版采用 Blackwell GB203 芯片,使用了该芯片 10,752 个核心中的 8,192 个。因此,与同类命名的桌面芯片相比,它更接近于桌面 RTX 5070(6.144 个核心) ,而不是同类命名的桌面 RTX 5080 (10.752 个核心)。不过,内存总线与台式机 RTX 5080 一样,都是 256 位总线,用于 16 GB GDDR7。

作为一项新功能,Blackwell 借助第五代张量内核,通过 DLSS4 支持多帧生成 (MFG)。

性能

笔记本电脑 RTX 5080 的平均理论性能与台式机 RTX 5070 和较早的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 GPU(Time Spy GPU)相近。在游戏(如《毁灭战士:黑暗时代》)中,虽然 RTX 5080 支持前面提到的 MFG 选项以获得令人印象深刻的帧速率,但其性能也与旧版 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 GPU 相当。不过延迟还是一样的,所以在没有帧生成的情况下,你至少应该从 60 fps 开始。

功耗

GB203 由台积电采用 4N FinFET 工艺制造(定制 4NP 5nm)。显卡的最大 TGP 可以达到 150 瓦(125 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X9
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines8192 - unified
TMUs256
ROPs96
Raytracing Cores64
Tensor / AI Cores256
Core Speed975 - 2287 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU1334 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 8 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
18.1 pt (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 4437     avg: 5474     median: 5675 (39%)     max: 5984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 4057     avg: 4947     median: 5207 (36%)     max: 5545 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 18131     avg: 21764     median: 22715 (52%)     max: 23495 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
136280 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 31990     avg: 39614     median: 41156 (48%)     max: 44155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
102290 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 28196     avg: 37550     median: 36989.5 (56%)     max: 47218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 40859     avg: 48675     median: 48354 (44%)     max: 58176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 378821     avg: 466815     median: 466815 (52%)     max: 554809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 15055     avg: 19701     median: 20341.5 (54%)     max: 22002 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 16644     avg: 21143     median: 21624.5 (44%)     max: 23269 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
12640 -40%
12806 -39%
13395 -37%
15184 -28%
16308 -23%
16838 -20%
17764 -16%
19434 -8%
20950 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
21143
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 10%
23736 12%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 10%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 119%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
816913 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
574989 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 45412     avg: 65613     median: 68004.5 (64%)     max: 77833 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 121952     avg: 134839     median: 133423 (33%)     max: 153968 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
93167 Points (88%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
202878 Points (78%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 23329     avg: 46110     median: 48827 (59%)     max: 51993 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 27551     avg: 62671     median: 65874 (50%)     max: 71866 Points
171.8 -100%
...
43219 -31%
44484 -29%
44536 -29%
46877 -25%
51979 -17%
54921 -12%
56687 -10%
56791 -9%
59943 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
62671
65041 4%
67212 7%
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 9%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 107%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 134668     avg: 176777     median: 176776 (51%)     max: 218885 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 130065     avg: 140541     median: 140540 (77%)     max: 151016 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
64892 Points (71%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
50971 -21%
52117 -20%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
53834 -17%
54180 -17%
54320 -16%
55811 -14%
61324 -5%
61850 -5%
62666 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
64892
68580 6%
68868 6%
69623 7%
75005 16%
...
68868 6%
max:
87172 34%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 65711     avg: 67446     median: 67446 (88%)     max: 69181 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 223.3     avg: 237.1     median: 237.1 (72%)     max: 250.9 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 18     avg: 22.1     median: 20 (3%)     max: 49 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 11.6     avg: 14.1     median: 13 (5%)     max: 26 Seconds
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
38.2 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
59.9 fps (17%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
668 fps (72%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
65.7 fps (11%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
124 fps (43%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
106 fps (52%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
202 fps (53%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
30.7 fps (3%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
25 fps (16%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
395 fps (57%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
48 fps (11%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
110 fps (49%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
146 fps (49%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6835     avg: 15894     median: 15893.5 (11%)     max: 24952 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 214.66     avg: 221.3     median: 221.3 (73%)     max: 227.9 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 217     avg: 293.5     median: 302.5 (18%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 233.5     avg: 234     median: 234 (88%)     max: 234.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 502.8     avg: 505     median: 504.8 (91%)     max: 506.8 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1074     avg: 1086     median: 1085.8 (80%)     max: 1097.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 997     avg: 1005     median: 1005.3 (95%)     max: 1013.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1108     avg: 1129     median: 1129.2 (24%)     max: 1150.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1062     avg: 1087     median: 1087.4 (45%)     max: 1112.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 4018     avg: 4077     median: 4077.5 (32%)     max: 4136.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 1012     median: 315 (8%)     max: 2141 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 159452     avg: 194665     median: 198228 (52%)     max: 216152 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 7808     avg: 92151     median: 45801 (11%)     max: 195944 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 8969     avg: 8999     median: 8999 (32%)     max: 9029 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 18868     avg: 19028     median: 19028 (33%)     max: 19188 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 49349     avg: 50127     median: 50127 (42%)     max: 50905 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 145.3     avg: 211.9     median: 231 (31%)     max: 253 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
281 Watt (39%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (60%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 156.4     avg: 258.3     median: 256 (71%)     max: 360 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 261     median: 291 (37%)     max: 353 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.436     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.664 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
43.8 dB(A) (63%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
med. 1920x1080
189  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
165  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
152.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.1  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
34.5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
194.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
156.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
106.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
69.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
109.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
214  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
196.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
172.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
128.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
87.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
114.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
98.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
52.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
156.2 177.7 257 267 ~ 214 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163.3 176.1 248 251 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
139.6 169.9 236 237 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.9 44.3 50.2 53.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.3 27.3 30.3 30.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.9 12.8 14.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
21.1 24.8 26.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
41.9 48.7 53.6 55.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
89.4
74.6
102.6
98.5
low 1920x1080
84 117.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
101.7 102.5 113 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
84.7 95.6 104 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.6 84.7 88 94.8 101 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.1 64 65 72 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
32.2 36.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
48 55 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
77.6 85 89.1 97 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
82.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.2 106.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.2 94.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
50.3 50.3 50.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.9 33.2 36.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
30.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51 53.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
50.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
75.7
low 1920x1080
87 91 98 107 110 111 115 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81 82 92 95 102 104 104 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66 68 80 88 88 90 91 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 50 58 58 63 63 63 64 65 67 69 69 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41 43 46 50 50 53 55 55 55 55 57 59 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 32 34 37 38 39 40 43 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41 42 44 48 49 52 54 55 56 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
41  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51 54 60 62 65 66 70 117 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
82
94
74
100
84
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
67
61
73
56
78
64
med. 1920x1080
173.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
165.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
158  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
101.2 102.5 110.1 127.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.8 97.2 104.4 111 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.7 78.3 82.5 83.1 87.3 90 90 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.9 62.3 67.7 69.8 70.6 71.7 73.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.9 38.6 42.7 42.9 45 45.2 47.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
50.9 51.1 57.9 59.3 60 61.5 61.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
64.9 75 80.1 80.8 84.7 87.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
173.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
141.7 142.4 172.6 186.4 187.9 189.3 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.9 109 127.8 141.8 145.8 145.9 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
95.7 96.8 110.7 115.2 124.2 127.2 127.2 129.2 149.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.4 78 85.1 86.2 87.8 99.3 99.5 100.1 102.4 117 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.4 50 53.8 55.2 57.2 61.8 62.5 63.2 71.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
86.8 90.9 101.2 103.6 117.1 118.1 120.1 135.5 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
94.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
150
73.4
77.1
64.2
67.1
82.5
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
28.4
22.5
28.6
Very Ultra + FSR Quality + FG 2560x1440
55.4
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
61.4 90.7 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.9 78.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.9 72.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.5 58.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
55.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
62.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
80.7 122.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Quality FSR 3840x2160
40.7
low 1920x1080
155 210 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
143 190 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106 150 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99 138 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73 109 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
71  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98 117 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
74.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
88.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
86.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
86.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
82.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.8 81.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7 75.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
66.8 67.8 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
51.2 51.4 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160 cinem.
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160 cinem.
44.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
64.8 67.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
93.5
low 1920x1080
106.8 171 ~ 139 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
92.1 124 128 ~ 115 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
71.9 96 99 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.8 50 56 57 58 59 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29.3 41 43 43 44 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.1 23 24 26 26 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
33.2 39 42 45 45 46 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54 60.4 62 64 64 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
54.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
0
110
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
43
37
40
28.4
40
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
74
64
72
54.5
73
low FSR 68 1280x720
119.9
low XeSS 68 1280x720
109.3
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
192.8 320 366 396 ~ 319 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
192.4 336 349 350 399 ~ 325 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131.2 225 277 318 323 328 354 ~ 279 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.1 103.6 110.3 127.1 127.5 130.7 132.5 134.8 137.7 142.9 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62.4 66.8 77 79.3 83.6 84.4 84.5 84.7 91.4 92.6 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9 38.8 39.4 41.9 42.5 46.1 46.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
53.8 65.9 68.2 71.8 72.7 76.7 79.3 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
27.2  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
14.3 109.1 126.9 127 129.1 131.3 134.2 139.1 143.6 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
43.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
55.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
110.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
105.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
96.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
148.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
117.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
110.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
84.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
135.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
134.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
131.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
127.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
202
low 1920x1080
92 92.2 130.6 134.7 135.6 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
63.2 89.7 125.7 125.9 131.9 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83.8 85.7 99.1 108.6 112.6 113.5 115.7 116.4 121.5 124.2 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.5 60.3 67.2 74.3 76.5 77.4 78.3 80.2 82.4 83.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.5 35.4 39.7 40.7 42.3 43.1 44 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
46.2 57.8 59.9 63.1 65.7 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
64.5
53.7
56.7
45.5
65.7
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
20
16.9
18.5
14.1
20.6
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
18
18.5
16
17.3
13.6
19.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
34.6
34.9
29.5
32.6
26.4
36
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
61.7
62.8
53
58.3
45.7
63.3
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
109.6
112.8
91.1
105.8
83.7
115.1
med. 1920x1080
345  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
290  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
255  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
205  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
111.7 122.1 125.1 171.8 176.3 181 187.9 198.4 199.9 211 225 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107.9 117.1 122.3 157.8 160.2 170.3 180.5 181.7 189.8 192 192.9 197.1 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106.8 111.8 118.4 143.9 148.1 150.4 160.9 164.8 167.2 167.5 167.9 172.5 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.7 109.8 109.9 135.1 136.6 138.1 139.6 139.8 144.3 148.8 148.9 149.9 151.9 156.2 168 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.2 79.6 85.9 90 94.6 95.1 96.4 97.9 99.5 99.7 99.7 99.8 102.4 103.2 104 111 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.3 39.1 40.9 42 42.7 45.9 46.3 46.5 47.1 47.5 49.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
59.3 59.6 62.2 68.1 69.2 71.5 72.3 73.4 74.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
29.9 34.4 43 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.2 88.9 89 94 103.8 103.9 110.6 111 115.2 115.6 117.9 118.2 119 127.1 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
240
253
125.6
125.5
182
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
73.4
60.7
68.2
71.1
65.3
53.4
51.1
76.7
70.9
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
169.7
173.1
95.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
22.4
21.4
18.6
21.8
22.1
18.4
19.7
15.9
23.5
21.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
141.2
140.9
128.4
103.2
133.4
100.7
144.6
129.1
141.1
123.2
86.1
153.9
142.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
12
12
10.3
11.4
8.6
12.5
11.4
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
24.8
25.3
21.6
24.7
24.5
17.6
26.5
24.2
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
45.1
41.7
39.6
44.8
44.6
47.8
43.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.4
84.4
69.8
81.7
81.9
89.2
80.8
low 1920x1080
162.5 172.8 203 232 244 244.8 246 260 276.1 ~ 227 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
138.6 159.8 160 195.5 202 206 209.1 211 220.6 250.5 ~ 195 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141 144.9 171.9 181.6 182.4 185.4 186.2 194.5 220.1 ~ 179 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
144 144.7 163.3 166.3 169.3 178 179.6 180.3 180.9 182.8 184.3 191.9 202.6 211.5 225.1 ~ 180 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
105.9 106.9 118.3 120.7 123 130.5 131.1 131.6 132.8 133.1 135.5 136.7 154.4 155.8 160.7 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55.7 59.4 69.8 70.6 73.4 74.3 79.8 81.1 85.7 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
30.6 83.2 91.7 105.6 114.4 114.6 117.3 129.6 132.4 134.9 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
89  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
145.3 167.3 181 187.3 207.5 216.6 ~ 184 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
278
164.3
257
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
164.6
Ultra Preset + Quality FSR 2.2 2560x1440
140.2
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
189.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
164.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
148.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
139.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
92.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
180.3
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
406 408 549 553 600 613 638 ~ 538 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
305 352 406 429 434 456 495 507 ~ 423 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
293 323 386 393 403 406 436 451 481 ~ 397 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
281 299 314 356 367 371 371 382 397 412 421 434 ~ 367 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
230 235 261 265 268 278 281 283 294 296 303 304 ~ 275 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
130.1 144 148.9 150 156.1 159 162.4 169.7 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105.7 107 112.2 118.9 135.7 143 145.8 156.6 158 158.5 163.7 168 168.6 170 182.7 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.4 100.2 104.3 127.5 131.1 132.2 135.5 136.3 138.2 139.5 151.6 151.8 153.7 154.7 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.9 82.5 84 84.2 105.1 108.8 108.9 110.6 111.9 113.9 123.7 123.8 124.5 126.4 127.4 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67.5 69.6 86.6 90.8 97.8 98.7 100.7 101.8 124.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
175.3 194.4 231 232 233 233 233 234 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
151.7 175.6 207 218 220 229 230 232 232 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.6 146 152.3 176.3 183.7 189.6 189.6 189.9 191.7 194.8 197 204 210 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
111.2 113.7 118.8 131.3 144.5 149.4 151.2 152.1 153 157.4 158.8 166.3 173.1 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.6 69.1 76.7 87 88.9 96.5 100.7 101.3 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
152.6 164.2 171.5 201 211 219 220 224 228 240 241 260 265 270 327 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137 141.9 155.7 177.5 186.4 188.9 193.1 193.9 201 208 216 226 229 231 304 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125.4 139.7 145.8 173.2 175.1 180.4 184.2 185.9 191.6 201 203 212 216 217 271 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.9 128.5 134.2 158.3 160.4 162.3 171.7 171.8 175.5 185.2 188.2 188.9 194.7 199 239 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
114.9 119 152.9 155.9 166 167.9 178.6 180.2 182.1 199.2 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
648  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
574  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
419  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
203 207 ~ 205 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
167.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
149.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
98
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
473
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
179.7 185.9 186.5 190.2 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
174.4 184.1 184.6 185.4 189.5 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.4 170.6 181.3 181.5 186.5 189 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
113.4 124.8 139.5 146.1 158.7 164.1 168.2 170.3 185 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
108.4 120.6 137.4 143.9 151.7 156.2 163.3 164.9 177.8 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
146.1 173.3 182.8 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
102.2
92.5
96.7
81
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
189.7
183.4
184.3
171.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.2
187
180
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 7189165604021
Anno 117: Pax Romana152.2121.696.95538.321.1
ARC Raiders194.4156.1106.478.946.1
The Outer Worlds 2130.2109.267.445.824
Battlefield 6214196.7172.7128.487.947.5
Borderlands 49675.664.145.531.516.8
F1 25214210196472813
Doom: The Dark Ages10110695906534
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered768780502917.9
Assassin's Creed Shadows1039482615237
Civilization 7173.4165.5158
Monster Hunter Wilds110102826843
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2173.8145.6101.674.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle1701301199358
Stalker 265.77662585028.2
Call of Duty Black Ops 61831671281199172
Until Dawn92.99181.659
Space Marine 29089.788.786.2
Star Wars Outlaws82.68174675130
Black Myth: Wukong13911589534124
F1 243193252791248141
Senua's Saga Hellblade 299.37655.1
Ghost of Tsushima110.7105.797.576.7
Horizon Forbidden West148.2117.7115.590.7
Dragon's Dogma 284.882.3
Helldivers 2135.9134.5131.9127.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356356356356
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora137126111855528
Alan Wake 21171071087439
Counter-Strike 2345290255205
Cyberpunk 20771741641481389644
Baldur's Gate 322719517918013272
Far Cry 6189.8164.6151148.7139.892.2
Strange Brigade538423397367275153
X-Plane 11.1114613310893
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark22121118114586
Dota 2 Reborn226199188172162
The Witcher 3648574419205167.7149.5
GTA V186184179152147167
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


8
17


13
24


18
20

6
15
12
2
11
14
10
9
10
5
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 12. 08:57:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:40:46 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.036s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12927 +0.036s ... 0.072s

#13 got single benchmarks 12927 +0.08s ... 0.152s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.538s ... 1.69s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.69s

#17 Got 1065 rows for game benchmarks. +0.577s ... 2.267s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.267s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 2.303s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.528s ... 2.831s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.835s

#22 return log +0s ... 2.835s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop graphics card

华硕 ROG NUC 15

2025 年最佳迷你游戏 PC:华硕 ROG NUC 15(配备GeForce RTX 5080 和 Core Ultra 9)评测

华硕 ROG NUC 15 是一款小巧的游戏利器,其目标用户显然是游戏玩家。它配备了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 GPU,可在最小的空间内实现强大的性能。我们当前的评测详细展示了这款迷你 PC 的实际性能。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 3 kg
Legion 9 18IAX10 评测:联想首款 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑几乎是全垒打

Legion 9 18IAX10 评测:联想首款 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑几乎是全垒打

尽管联想Legion 9 18 在 18 英寸游戏机领域姗姗来迟,但即使与微星泰坦或雷蛇刀锋 18 等经验丰富的机型相比,它也是同尺寸机型中的佼佼者。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
最后一款 17 英寸 Blackwell Mohican:微星 Vector 17 HX AI 游戏笔记本评测

最后一款 17 英寸 Blackwell Mohican:微星 Vector 17 HX AI 游戏笔记本评测

在微星 Vector 16 之后,我们还测试了配备 RTX 5080 的全新 Vector 17,这是最后几款配备 Blackwell GPU 的 17 英寸笔记本电脑之一,因为 16 英寸和 18 英寸机型意味着 17 英寸笔记本电脑现在几乎绝迹。我们测试了 Vector 17 存在的理由。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 17.00" | 3 kg
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 AI 评测:终于有了更安静的游戏笔记本电脑,但代价是什么?

宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 AI 评测:终于有了更安静的游戏笔记本电脑,但代价是什么?

凭借其酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑,这款 18 英寸游戏台式机替代品实际上属于高端游戏类别。那么,Helios 18 AI 比竞争对手好在哪里?...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测:戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测:戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

戴尔今年将从头开始刷新其 Alienware 产品线,采用新的 Arrow Lake CPU、新的 Blackwell GPU 和新的 AW30 设计语言。Area-51 的外观和手感都比之前的产品更好,但它仍然表现出许多与 Alienware 相同的优点和缺点。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 3.3 kg

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » AMD 为 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 带来激情:微星 Raider A18 HX A9W 笔记本电脑评测

Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑评测:几乎一样快,却便宜很多

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 笔记本电脑评测:RTX 5080 在游戏巨头中表现如何?

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 14 英寸GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评论

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测:几乎无损的 400 W 电源

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5080 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 预览版--配备 AMD、RTX 5000 和 300 Hz Mini-LED 的最快游戏笔记本电脑

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快,但还有更多惊喜等着你

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LW

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10, RTX 5080: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10, RTX 5080

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LW

Alienware 16 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73, RTX 5080: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73, RTX 5080

MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5080: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5080

Alienware 18 Area-51, RTX 5080: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51, RTX 5080

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWIG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWIG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10

MSI Vector A18 HX A9WIG: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector A18 HX A9WIG

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG

Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH)

MSI Raider 18 HX AI A2XWIG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider 18 HX AI A2XWIG

Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Asus ROG NUC 15-90AS00I1: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 3 kg
   » 华硕 ROG NUC 15 在评测中给人留下深刻印象,在迷你游戏电脑中独占鳌头 - 英特尔-英伟达双核处理器带来高端性能

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
   » 被低估的联想Legion 9 18 比雷蛇、微星等公司的笔记本电脑有更多升级选项

   » 如果设置为平衡模式,联想Legion 9 18 性能下降 20% 以上

Alienware 16 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.3 kg
   » 尺寸依然重要:Alienware 16 Area-51 RTX 5080 性能超越 Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090

   » Alienware 16 Area-51 将其最快的 175 W TGP 图形模式锁定在最响亮的风扇设置后面

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
   » 18 英寸笔记本电脑:这一类别不应仅限于微星 Raider A18 这样的游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14:最快的 14 英寸游戏机,却没有 5090,错失良机

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Strix G16 2025 评测结论:不错的 RTX 5080 游戏笔记本电脑,但更快的 Ryzen 9 9955HX 仅支持 RTX 5070 Ti

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Arc 130T *
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-07-29)