Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320笔记本电脑评测--XPS 13现在有了触摸条

迄今为止最强大的XPS 13。 多年来,XPS 13一直是一款非常好的副笔记本,戴尔现在提供了两个版本,它们不仅在CPU选择方面有所不同。在我们的评测中,配备4K面板、无框架触摸板和包括触摸条在内的全新键盘的新XPS 13 Plus表现如何?
Alder Lake Thunderbolt Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Touchscreen XPS Windows Intel Evo

戴尔从现在开始提供两个版本的紧凑型XPS 13;采用Alder Lake U系列CPU的普通XPS 13,起价999美元,以及采用更强大的Alder Lake P系列芯片的新XPS 13 Plus,起价1299美元。这两款机型都使用了全新的外壳,与之前的机型相比有很大的变化XPS 13 9310几年来基本没有变化。

我们的新XPS 13 Plus的评测单元配备了英特尔酷睿i7-1260P,32GB LPDDR5-5200内存和1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD。显示屏是熟悉的4K面板,长宽比为16:10,还具有触摸屏。与普通的XPS 13 9320相反,XPS 13 Plus也可以配置一个3.5K的OLED屏幕。我们的评测单元的建议零售价为2099美元,戴尔再次提供带有Linux的开发者版本。

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K (XPS 13 Plus Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1260P 12 x 1.5 - 4.7 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 34 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5-5200, Dual-Channel, Onboard
Display
13.40 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 338 PPI, capacitive, LQ134R1, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 813 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.3 x 295.3 x 199
Battery
55 Wh, 4524 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad Speakers, Keyboard Light: yes, 60W USB-C PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.242 kg, Power Supply: 254 g
Price
2400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
07/2022
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg15.3 mm13.40"3840x2400
90.1 %
07/2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
89.8 %
02/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
946 g16 mm13.00"2160x1350
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
88.8 %
02/2022
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg16.5 mm13.40"2520x1680
87.4 %
12/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.8 mm13.40"3840x2400

外壳 - XPS 13的新设计

要将新的XPS 13 Plus与它的前任区分开来并不容易。 前辈当盖子被关闭时,特别是在我们的铂金色选项中。你也可以得到深灰色(石墨色)的XPS 13 Plus。倾斜的后部和楔形底座的基本设计仍然是相同的,但当你打开盖子时,你会立即看到主要的区别。戴尔扔掉了Chiclet键盘,采用了一个更传统的、按键之间没有缝隙的单元。没有典型的功能键,相反,你现在得到了一个电容式触摸条(后面会有更多介绍)。我们特别喜欢新的掌托区,它使用一块玻璃,指纹完全不是问题。尤其是以前版本的深色机型,很快就被指纹覆盖。显示屏边框非常窄,导致89%的屏占比非常好。

XPS 13 Plus的稳定性非常好,整个设备主要由铝制造,也给人留下非常坚固的印象。无论是底座,还是盖子都不能被推入或扭曲。我们也喜欢铰链的调整,但用一只手打开盖子并不容易,因为在底座单元的前面没有压痕。最大的打开角度是135度。

无论是旧的戴尔XPS 13 9310新的XPS 13 Plus是我们比较组中最紧凑的设备,把XPS 13放在袋子/背包里是没有问题的。另一方面,重量是一般的,而且这两款产品都是华硕Zenbook S 13以及ThinkPad X1 Nano都明显要轻一些。60W的电源适配器非常紧凑,但长的连接线仍然使整体重量增加到254克。

尺寸比较

304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg297.2 mm 218.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.3 kg295.3 mm 199 mm 15.3 mm 1.2 kg292.8 mm 207.7 mm 16 mm 946 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性--戴尔扔掉了3.5毫米的立体声插孔

不断减少的端口数量在XPS 13在过去的几年里,这种趋势不幸地在新的XPS 13 Plus(还有普通的XPS 13)上继续。当Apple 开始包括更多的端口时(例如在新的MacBook Air M2上),戴尔甚至更进一步,取消了3.5毫米立体声插孔。每侧只有一个完全支持Thunderbolt 4的USB-C端口。戴尔至少在默认情况下包括两个适配器(用于USB-A和3.5毫米),但我们希望在设备上有更多的端口。前代产品的读卡器也被移除。

左侧。USB-C 4.0和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-ALT模式)。
左侧。USB-C 4.0和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-ALT模式)。
右侧。USB-C 4.0和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-ALT模式)。
右侧。USB-C 4.0和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-ALT模式)。

沟通

Wi-Fi模块已经焊接完毕。
Wi-Fi模块已经焊接完毕。

戴尔为新的XPS 13 Plus配备了英特尔的现代AX211E模块,它支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而,我们无法使用我们参考路由器的相应6GHz网络。我们已经在新版本的XPS 15上看到了这个问题。XPS 15XPS 17,其中天线的配置不支持6GHz,但对于一个全新的设计来说,这将是非常奇怪的。我们已经在与戴尔联系,一旦得到新的信息,我们会立即更新文章。

在常规的Wi-Fi 6网络中,Wi-Fi性能仍然非常好和稳定。我们在审查期间没有注意到任何连接问题,无论是与我们的参考路由器,还是与AVM Frtitz!Box 7490(Wi-Fi 5)。蓝牙5.2也得到了支持。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1365 (955min - 1588max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=4)
1320 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1225 (540min - 1382max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
909 (814min - 1010max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1501 (1471min - 1536max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=4)
1409 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1259 (628min - 1412max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1258 (1143min - 1362max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1558 (1401min, 1409.7P1 - 1609max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (1365min - 1583max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 1824, n=47, last 2 years)
1263 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=186)
1243 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1662 (1600min - 1681max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1553 (1443min - 1620max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (353 - 1775, n=47, last 2 years)
1407 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=186)
1394 MBit/s -16%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1661 (1600-1681)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1558 (1401-1609)

网络摄像头

戴尔仍然使用720p的网络摄像头,但画质还可以,至少在良好的照明条件下。不过,考虑到视频会议的数量越来越多,一个1080p的传感器会更加充分,许多制造商都承认这一点。

ColorChecker
4.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K: 5.8 ∆E min: 0.68 - max: 12.89 ∆E

维护

拆卸底板很容易,它只由6颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定。内部布局非常整洁,但你的维护行动仅限于清洁风扇和更换M.2-2280固态硬盘(如有必要)。

内部布局
内部布局

输入设备 - XPS 13采用了新的键盘设计

键盘

输入设备进行了一次大修,XPS 13 Plus也与普通的XPS 13不同。戴尔放弃了Plus型号的Chiclet键盘,现在使用更传统的布局,各个按键之间没有缝隙。制造商使用了机箱的整个宽度,按键也很方便大。尽管按键行程有限(1.0毫米),但流畅的打字体验和精确的反馈也让我们感到惊喜。总而言之,这是一个好的键盘,我们更喜欢它而不是旧的。然而,如果你只习惯于小键盘,可能需要一点时间来适应这种布局,因为它更难感觉到按键之间的过渡。电源键位于右上角,非常窄,所以在打字时不会受到干扰。它也是一个指纹扫描仪。

电容式触摸条既可以显示特殊功能,也可以显示...
电容式触摸条既可以显示特殊功能,也可以显示...
...或普通功能键。
...或普通功能键。
触摸条的照明在黑暗环境中会让人眼花缭乱。
触摸条的照明在黑暗环境中会让人眼花缭乱。

然后是带有功能键的触摸感应条,它总是被照亮,它要么显示特殊功能,如亮度或音量控制,要么显示常规的F键。一般来说,它工作得很好,但在较暗的环境中,照明可能会很烦人,而且你不能调整它。有两种不同的强度,但自动调节在我们的设备上并不总是可靠地工作。如果你在晚上看视频,即使是在较低的亮度设置下,照明也会成为一个问题。总而言之,触摸条更像是一个噱头,我们看不出它比普通按钮有什么优势。键盘照明不能通过传感器控制,在最高设置下也不是很亮。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

触摸板和触摸屏

你无法看到触摸板。
你无法看到触摸板。

戴尔将点击板隐藏在掌托下面,你无法看到任何边界或过渡。输入区域从空格键的左边缘开始,在Alt Gr键的右边缘结束。我们很快就习惯了,并没有因为缺少过渡而产生任何问题,但如果你想在右下角触发右键,就会变得有点复杂。我们建议你用两个手指简单地点击一下,以实现右键。你可以在整个表面上点击垫子,而且点击的声音也不会太大。在审查期间,我们非常喜欢玻璃表面良好的滑行能力。

你也可以使用电容式触摸屏,它的工作原理与预期一致。然而,当你触摸它时,显示屏总是有点晃动。

显示器 - 戴尔提供IPS和OLED面板

戴尔为XPS 13 Plus提供四种不同的面板。除了两个带和不带触摸屏的FHD型号(非触摸单元也有玻璃层,没有哑光选项),还有一个3.5K OLED屏幕,以及我们评测单元的4K IPS屏幕。该面板再次由夏普提供,型号也与之前的型号相同 以前的型号但我们注意到一些差异。主观的画质仍然很好,但在一些应用程序中仍然会有缩放问题。

戴尔宣传的亮度为500cd/m²,但我们的评测设备平均只能达到474尼特。考虑到亮度,黑值(0.28)还是可以的,对比度也非常好,达到了~1700:1。不过,~30尼特的最低亮度可能是一个问题,特别是如果你在非常黑暗的环境中使用它。这显然不符合人体工程学,但它发生了。

虽然XPS 13的可选OLED屏幕受到PWM闪烁的影响,但我们这次在IPS显示屏上没有发现任何闪烁。与之前的XPS 13 9310的4K屏幕相比,响应时间也明显更好,而且没有出现重影的大问题。当你使用全亮度时,背光渗漏只是上边缘的一个小问题,但这在实践中几乎不明显。IPS屏幕的可视角度稳定性也非常好。

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
在最大亮度下只有轻微的背光渗漏
在最大亮度下只有轻微的背光渗漏
视角稳定
视角稳定
441
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ134R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 494 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 473.6 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 493 cd/m²
Contrast: 1764:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
MND007ZA1-2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13.00
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Display
20%
-4%
14%
-11%
3%
20%
Display P3 Coverage
76.5
99.8
30%
70.4
-8%
98.6
29%
65.2
-15%
80.2
5%
99.7
30%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
92
-8%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
76
97.8
29%
72
-5%
85.9
13%
67.5
-11%
78.9
4%
97.7
29%
Response Times
94%
-24%
1%
-10%
-68%
92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.9 ?(21.4, 17.5)
2.1 ?(1.1, 1)
95%
46.8 ?(22, 24.8)
-20%
31 ?(14, 17)
20%
44.8 ?(22, 22.8)
-15%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-52%
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
94%
Response Time Black / White *
21.9 ?(11.9, 10)
1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82)
92%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-28%
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
-19%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-4%
40.4 ?(22.4, 18)
-84%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
90%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(53)
118000 ?(49, 155)
9804 ?(20, 47)
2137 ?(31)
240.4 ?(51)
Screen
111%
14%
10%
5%
-5%
-43%
Brightness middle
494
336
-32%
460
-7%
417
-16%
468
-5%
508.7
3%
384
-22%
Brightness
474
338
-29%
434
-8%
395
-17%
450
-5%
479
1%
387
-18%
Brightness Distribution
89
99
11%
92
3%
91
2%
92
3%
84
-6%
97
9%
Black Level *
0.28
0.02
93%
0.27
4%
0.39
-39%
0.23
18%
0.3
-7%
Contrast
1764
16800
852%
1704
-3%
1069
-39%
2035
15%
1696
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
1.8
42%
1.1
65%
1.12
64%
2
35%
2.72
12%
4.56
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.2
3.8
10%
4.5
-7%
2.71
35%
5.5
-31%
4.7
-12%
7.27
-73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
1.8
-20%
1
33%
0.77
49%
1.5
-0%
1.92
-28%
4.52
-201%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
0.9
72%
1.6
50%
1.7
47%
2.6
19%
3.4
-6%
1.5
53%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2207 0%
2.17 101%
2.11 104%
2.26 97%
CCT
6189 105%
6580 99%
6475 100%
6870 95%
6511 100%
6245 104%
6219 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.7
70.7
87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9
100
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
75% / 89%
-5% / 5%
8% / 9%
-5% / -0%
-23% / -12%
23% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

在我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行分析时,我们注意到该面板只覆盖了小的sRGB色彩参考,尽管戴尔宣传说对更广泛的P3色域有90%的覆盖。我们无法支持这一说法,并已与制造商取得联系。以前的型号 之前的型号在这方面也没有好多少。

CalMAN灰度(参考色彩空间sRGB)
CalMAN灰度(参考色彩空间sRGB)
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(参考色彩空间sRGB)
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(参考色彩空间sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(参考色彩空间sRGB)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(参考色彩空间sRGB)。
CalMAN灰度校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)。
CalMAN灰度校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)。
CalMAN饱和度扫频校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)
CalMAN饱和度扫频校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(参考色彩空间sRGB)。

图像开箱后有点偏暖,有轻微的黄色色调,这很明显。与sRGB参考值相比,颜色偏差在3-4之间,没有任何异常值,这对日常使用场景来说完全没有问题。我们自己的校准(配置文件可在上面的方框中免费下载)摆脱了偏色,颜色偏差也更好,只有100%的红色仍然略高于3的重要标志。 我们的校准改善了画面,但最大亮度也下降了约35尼特。我们已经提到,该面板只覆盖了小的sRGB色域和P3,以及AdobeRGB的76%。如果你需要更广的色域,你就不得不购买带有可选的OLED屏幕的XPS 13。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.9 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.4 ms rise
↘ 17.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在非常明亮的环境中,要防止反光并不容易,但亮度很好,你应该能在阴凉处找到一个地方,可以很舒服地看到显示内容。

性能 - Alder Lake-P和PCIe 4.0

新的XPS 13 Plus只提供桤木湖-P的CPU,首先是酷睿i5-1240P酷睿i7-1260P(各有4个性能核心和8个效率核心),一直到酷睿i7-1280P含有两个额外的性能核心(配置类似于酷睿i7-12700H).用户还可以选择8、16或32GB内存(LPDDR5-5200),但32GB选项仅适用于i7 CPU。

 
 

审查设置

戴尔电源管理器
戴尔电源管理器

戴尔在预装的电源管理器软件中提供了四种不同的性能配置文件(优化安静超性能冷却),但我们没有仔细研究冷却配置文件。其他配置文件的TDP设置列在下面的表格中。

静音 优化 超强性能
TDP CPU负载 64 -> 13 Watts 64 -> 20 Watts 64 -> 34 Watts
TDP压力测试 64 -> 13 瓦特 64 -> 20 瓦特 64 -> 64 瓦特

在默认的优化设置下,CPU性能下降得相当快,因此我们在下面的基准测试和测量中使用了超性能配置文件。新的XPS 13 Plus的冷却性能对于一个紧凑的设备来说实际上是非常好的,在日常情况下或在短时峰值负载情况下,风扇通常是安静的。在持续的工作负荷下,两个风扇在这种设置下会变得有些吵闹,但性能也是相当不错的回报。处理器在所有三种模式下最多可以使用64W,但这个数值通常只达到一秒钟。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1260P

芯片酷睿i7-1260P目前是昂贵的次笔记本的一个非常流行的选择,其混合配置(4个性能和8个效率核心)的性能潜力非常高。与旧的XPS 13 9310与Tiger Lake 酷睿i7-1185G7相比,在合成基准测试中,性能高出约50%(平均)。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø659 (587.69-862.27)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø714 (631.55-870.74)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)
CPU数据Cinebench R15多循环(红色:超性能,绿色:优化,蓝色:静音)。
CPU数据Cinebench R15多循环(红色:超性能,绿色:优化,蓝色:静音)。

我们的Cinebench多循环证实了目前英特尔Alder Lake处理器的问题。多核性能基本与目前的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U起初,但Ryzen的功耗只有30W。在测试过程中,XPS 13 Plus中的i7稳定在34W,与配备6800U的Zenbook S 13的25W相比,性能略低。

优化性能配置文件也证实了Alder Lake-P在较低的功率限制下没有竞争力,因为XPS 13 Plus在20W时只是略微领先于老式的Tiger Lake 四核CPU。Quietprofile将TDP进一步降低到13W,这导致CB R15多循环中的650-700分。

单核性能(这对日常场景很重要)无疑是非常好的,但代价是高消耗数字。

由于功率限制略低(54/27W),多核性能在电池电量上略低(-6 %)。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
82.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
80.7 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
79.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
 
78.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 -5!
Apple M2
73.9 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry -1!
Apple M1
63.7 pt
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
54.8 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
54.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE -1!
Intel Core i7-1160G7
49.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points +7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)
10289 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9743 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (3173 - 12150, n=27)
9314 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8745 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
5648 (4011.45min - 5648.13max) Points -42%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5186 Points -47%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5062 (4319.28min - 5062.12max) Points -48%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1678 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (1155 - 1812, n=25)
1674 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)
1627 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1581 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1440 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1218 Points -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)
3963 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
3909 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (1234 - 4748, n=25)
3595 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
2349 Points -40%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1982 Points -49%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1936 Points -50%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1863 Points -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
1750 Points -55%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
648 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (448 - 698, n=25)
645 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)
610 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
567 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
544 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
431 Points -33%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
401 Points -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
381 Points -41%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points +4%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1677 (1481.98min - 1677.36max) Points
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1626 (983.94min - 1625.95max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (549 - 2034, n=29)
1553 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1229 (1226.62min, 1226.74P1 - 1232.55max) Points -27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points -39%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
970 (913.26min - 969.84max) Points -42%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
961 Points -43%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
871 (631.55min - 870.74max) Points -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
862 Points -49%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
240 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (165.4 - 260, n=27)
232 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
223 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
217.1 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
208 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
208 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
208 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * -123%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
652 Seconds * -104%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
625 Seconds * -96%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
595 Seconds * -87%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
509 Seconds * -60%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)
386 Seconds * -21%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (264 - 906, n=26)
366 Seconds * -15%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
319 Seconds *
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47500 MIPS +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years)
44459 MIPS +3%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
43056 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (16146 - 47064, n=25)
38707 MIPS -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
34614 MIPS -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
26001 MIPS -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
22305 MIPS -48%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
20478 MIPS -52%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
5441 MIPS +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5431 MIPS +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)
5328 MIPS 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
5325 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (4064 - 5791, n=25)
5284 MIPS -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5099 MIPS -4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
4851 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
4596 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9817 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)
9084 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8962 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (3866 - 10570, n=25)
8763 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points -23%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5791 Points -41%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5402 Points -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
4660 Points -53%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1937 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1723 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1701 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (1436 - 1786, n=25)
1693 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1546 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1430 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
1406 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.6 fps +7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years)
11.9 fps +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
11.8 fps
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (3.45 - 13.6, n=26)
10.8 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.55 fps -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
6.06 fps -49%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.58 fps -53%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
54.1 s * -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
52.7 s * -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years)
52.6 s * -18%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
49.1 s * -10%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (40.2 - 65.7, n=25)
48.4 s * -9%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
47.7 s * -7%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
44.6 s *
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
12.88 s * +71%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
0.732 sec * -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7
0.64 sec * -30%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.624 sec * -27%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.605 sec * -23%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.529 sec * -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years)
0.52 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25)
0.5 sec * -1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4928 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
42.4 Points per Watt +49%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
40.2 Points per Watt +41%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
37.5 Points per Watt +32%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
28.5 Points per Watt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
16.1 Points per Watt -44%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1626 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
240 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
95.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
83 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
65.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
 
63.6 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11187 KRay/s +104%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years)
10054 KRay/s +83%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8273 KRay/s +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6940 KRay/s +27%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (2176 - 10898, n=26)
6522 KRay/s +19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5483 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
71474 Points +182%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years)
52488 Points +107%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33979 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (11015 - 56906, n=26)
31427 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28020 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
25348 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2455 MB/s +37%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years)
2361 MB/s +32%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2286 MB/s +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1945 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (669 - 2709, n=26)
1827 MB/s +2%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1795 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
82608 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years)
79878 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
75217 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (42571 - 82493, n=26)
72878 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
49312 Points -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
43991 Points -42%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10724 Points +80%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years)
7617 Points +28%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5943 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (2901 - 6975, n=26)
5770 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4677 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4208 Points -29%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39378 Points +166%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years)
27533 Points +86%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
20202 Points +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
16923 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (5950 - 26376, n=26)
16631 Points +12%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14790 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
101595 MB/s +166%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
71494 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64346 MB/s +68%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)
53217 MB/s +39%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (16041 - 92356, n=26)
45075 MB/s +18%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38204 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook
  (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years)
666 MB/s +2%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
653 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
630 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (259 - 771, n=26)
607 MB/s -7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
384 MB/s -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
295 MB/s -55%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5825 KRay/s +86%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years)
5239 KRay/s +67%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4454 KRay/s +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3657 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (1237 - 5858, n=26)
3577 KRay/s +14%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3136 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
39591 MPixel/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years)
35760 MPixel/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
34217 MPixel/s -14%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33424 MPixel/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (13261 - 43652, n=26)
30959 MPixel/s -22%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
25037 MPixel/s -37%

系统性能

新的XPS 13 Plus是一个反应非常快的设备,这也得到了良好的基准分数的支持。我们在审查期间没有遇到任何停顿或崩溃。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6346 Points +14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)
5879 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5558 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4796 - 6068, n=17)
5498 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
4950 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4872 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4615 Points -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10709 Points +3%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10404 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (9260 - 11251, n=17)
10341 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)
10247 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
9704 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9682 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
9482 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8984 Points +30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)
7857 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6167 - 8629, n=17)
6950 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6900 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6622 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
6352 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
6210 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7208 Points +11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)
6923 Points +7%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6492 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5231 - 6908, n=17)
6294 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
5342 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4894 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4530 Points -30%
CrossMark / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1667 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1484 - 1811, n=16)
1638 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)
1553 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1355 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1352 Points -19%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1486 - 1755, n=16)
1592 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1575 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)
1507 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1424 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1274 Points -19%
CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1861 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1451 - 1872, n=16)
1751 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)
1690 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1593 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1261 Points -32%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1253 - 1807, n=16)
1471 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1425 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1418 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)
1329 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1004 Points -29%
PCMark 10 Score
5558 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68214 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years)
61239 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (25125 - 71544, n=25)
54361 MB/s -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53900 MB/s -21%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
47701 MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46915 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64230 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years)
57245 MB/s -11%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56829 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (24983 - 72065, n=25)
56385 MB/s -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48771 MB/s -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39402 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years)
64603 MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62767 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
58275 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (23512 - 66799, n=25)
53353 MB/s -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50592 MB/s -19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
48723 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
120.1 ns *
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
105 ns *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years)
104 ns *
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
88.3 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-1260P
  (77.9 - 118.4, n=21)
78.7 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K、CPU负载)没有显示任何基本问题,但有一个驱动程序会出现一些问题。这意味着在目前的BIOS版本下,XPS 13 Plus并不是实时音频应用的理想选择。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1350 μs * -84%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1272 μs * -74%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
740 μs * -1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
732.2 μs *
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
588.9 μs * +20%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

M.2-2280固态硬盘可以被替换。
M.2-2280固态硬盘可以被替换。

戴尔在新的XPS 13 Plus上使用了快速的PCIe-4.0固态硬盘。我们的评测单元配备了1TB驱动器,但在初始设置后,你只能为自己的文件使用813GB。Windows笔记本电脑通常提供约900GB(配备1TB驱动器)。三星固态硬盘(PM9A1)的性能非常好,在持续的工作负荷下很稳定,考虑到紧靠冷却装置和热管的位置,这并不是一个问题。更多的SSD基准测试被列在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6947.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4646 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 371.42 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 375.49 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 370.02 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 764.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
91.5 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76.4 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
70.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
63.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
53.9 pt
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
40.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3871 (3794.8min - 3871.36max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=82)
3780 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3382 (3242.21min - 3381.81max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (452 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1862 (1714.42min - 1862.11max) MB/s -52%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1739 (1627.28min - 1738.54max) MB/s -55%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1669 (1658.05min - 1668.7max) MB/s -57%
seq write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=82)
3590 MB/s +15%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 (3158.91min - 3187.67max) MB/s +2%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3121 (2981.01min - 3120.61max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153.3 - 5344, n=58, last 2 years)
2808 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2131 (2095.68min - 2131.34max) MB/s -32%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1747 (1574.33min - 1747.35max) MB/s -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1727 (1712.18min - 1727.12max) MB/s -45%
seq q8 t1 read
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6905 (5743.52min - 6905.08max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6654 (5007.16min - 6653.54max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=82)
6471 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (558 - 7134, n=58, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -28%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
3265 (2733.64min - 3265.24max) MB/s -53%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3150 (2968.24min - 3149.71max) MB/s -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2484 (2298.9min - 2484.14max) MB/s -64%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5156 (5079.42min - 5156.48max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4938 (4919.31min - 4937.74max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=82)
4809 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (60 - 6751, n=58, last 2 years)
3775 MB/s -27%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2838 (2701.97min - 2838.06max) MB/s -45%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2527 (2511.97min - 2526.63max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1804 (1772.11min - 1803.55max) MB/s -65%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=82)
77 MB/s +2%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.7 (72.52min - 75.72max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67.3 (66.05min - 67.28max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 - 88.6, n=58, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -19%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
58.2 (57.45min - 58.23max) MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
44.7 (44.04min - 44.71max) MB/s -41%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
37.2 (32.92min - 37.21max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
277 (263.14min - 276.6max) MB/s +455%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
261 (255.77min - 260.58max) MB/s +423%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=82)
188.1 MB/s +277%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 360, n=58, last 2 years)
154.8 MB/s +210%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
149.4 (148.22min - 149.37max) MB/s +199%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
62 (60.38min - 61.95max) MB/s +24%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
49.9 (49.37min - 49.91max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=82)
2567 MB/s +372%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1732 (1718.36min - 1732.03max) MB/s +218%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1315 (1311.7min - 1314.99max) MB/s +142%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1227 (1201.13min - 1227.26max) MB/s +126%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (283 - 4286, n=58, last 2 years)
1215 MB/s +123%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
648 (598.17min - 647.92max) MB/s +19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
544 (518.47min - 543.87max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2394 (2307.09min - 2394.3max) MB/s +535%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=82)
1938 MB/s +414%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1283 (527.3min - 1282.99max) MB/s +240%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 4189, n=58, last 2 years)
869 MB/s +131%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
506 (496.78min - 506.11max) MB/s +34%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
377 (248.26min - 377.39max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
375 (366.66min - 375.31max) MB/s -1%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=82)
6848 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
5668 Points +25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5566 Points +23%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4522 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (707 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)
4437 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3570 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
3431 Points -24%
Score Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=82)
2415 Points +91%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2138 Points +69%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1705 Points +35%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)
1464 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1267 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1186 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1119 Points -12%
Score Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=82)
3269 Points +20%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3101 Points +14%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2720 Points
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2438 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3972, n=56, last 2 years)
2285 Points -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1904 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1654 Points -39%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=82)
4909 MB/s +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4664 MB/s 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4642 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (508 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)
3827 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2501 MB/s -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2228 MB/s -52%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2144 MB/s -54%
Seq Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=82)
3325 MB/s +72%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (386 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)
2355 MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2354 MB/s +22%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2179 MB/s +13%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1707 MB/s -12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1389 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.28 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=82)
72.5 MB/s -1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63.64 MB/s -13%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
61 MB/s -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s -19%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
49.77 MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
47.12 MB/s -36%
4K Write
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
237.4 MB/s +25%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
189.21 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=82)
186 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (65.5 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)
173.2 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
170.7 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
151.15 MB/s -20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
105 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=82)
1851 MB/s +154%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1827 MB/s +150%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1174.58 MB/s +61%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (187.3 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)
1022 MB/s +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
916 MB/s +26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
855 MB/s +17%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
729.57 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=82)
2750 MB/s +18%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2732.34 MB/s +17%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2338.23 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2032 MB/s -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 3410, n=56, last 2 years)
1873 MB/s -20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1660 MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1245 MB/s -47%
Access Time Read
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.021 - 0.257, n=56, last 2 years)
0.06214 ms * -170%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.058 ms * -152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
0.053 ms * -130%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
0.051 ms * -122%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=81)
0.03737 ms * -62%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * -0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms *
Access Time Write
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.272 ms * -1195%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.016 - 0.523, n=56, last 2 years)
0.07618 ms * -263%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
0.069 ms * -229%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=82)
0.03445 ms * -64%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms * -29%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
0.022 ms * -5%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K: Ø6840 (5814.14-6973.97)

GPU性能

GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7

由于Alder Lake CPU仍然使用相同的GPU,我们可以保持简短。Iris Xe Graphics G7我们已经从以前的XPS 13 9310的Tiger Lake 代知道。新的XPS 13 Plus略微受益于更快的内存模块,但整体的GPU性能与旧型号相当。AMD的新Radeon 680M iGPU在合成和游戏基准测试中都明显更快。当你在XPS 13 Plus上游戏时,你通常被限制在简单标题的中/高细节。

XPS没有通过3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试,即使使用超性能配置文件,尽管性能下降非常小(96.4%),而且你在游戏中不会注意到它。我们的Witcher 3 循环也显示了稳定的性能(尽管这个标题中的CPU负载相对较低)。

英特尔的Iris Xe Graphics G7仍然是多媒体用途的一个不错的选择,包括高分辨率的视频播放,图形性能只是在电池电量上略微慢一些。更多的GPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9095 Points +31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)
8227 Points +18%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
6956 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7471, n=194)
6345 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
5758 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
5465 Points -21%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5339 Points -23%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6683 Points +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)
6026 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5498 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5421 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 6143, n=207)
4905 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
4192 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
4189 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2287 Points +30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years)
2027 Points +15%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1758 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1603 Points -9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1871, n=204)
1494 Points -15%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
1342 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
1260 Points -28%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)
5503 Points +35%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4515 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4081 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3793 Points -7%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2054 - 4304, n=21)
3545 Points -13%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.575 fps per Watt +78%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.2436 - 1.116, n=45, last 2 years)
0.4503 fps per Watt +39%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (0.2055 - 0.842, n=109)
0.3896 fps per Watt +21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
0.3262 fps per Watt +1%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
0.3228 fps per Watt
3DMark 11 Performance
7499 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22229 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4985 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1974 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.3 (12-16)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 115.1 102.1 26.2 11
The Witcher 3 (2015) 99 62 34 14.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 109.9 85.2 68.2 60.6 26.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 44.7 25.3 25.3 13.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 55.5 42.9 36.9 19.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 59 32 29 26
Strange Brigade (2018) 95.2 45.9 36.4 29.5
F1 2021 (2021) 112.6 53.1 42.4 29.7
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 103 46 34 31

排放--XPS 13 Plus配备更响亮的风扇

系统噪音

新款XPS 13 Plus的两个风扇在轻度工作负荷下通常是停用或以最低速度运行(只有在静音环境下才能听到)。当你给系统施加压力时,它很快就会变得很吵,无论是使用优化版还是超性能版,这都是Alder Lake处理器的高功率限制的结果。在压力测试和CPU高负荷时,我们可以测量到高达45 dB(A),这显然是可以听到的,但没有来自风扇的恼人的频率。优化配置文件的结果是高达40.4 dB(A)。如果你想让它尽可能安静,在高工作负荷下可达35分贝(A),你应该使用静音配置文件。

静音 优化 超强性能
3DMark 06 33.1 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A)
CB R23 Single 33.1 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A)
CB R23 Multi 35 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
Witcher 3 35 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
压力测试 35 dB(A) 40.4 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)

总而言之,新的XPS 13 Plus的声音明显比旧型号大,也是对比组内最吵的一个。在我们的基准测试中,我们注意到来自SSD的一些电子噪音,但这是唯一的情况。

Noise Level

Idle
24.4 / 24.4 / 25.5 dB(A)
Load
40.4 / 45.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.731.732.32730.827.830.42528.133.332.230.931.328.433.63124.935.829.126.226.722.331.34026.732.23431.331.527.930.15027.330.726.929.125.622.129.96324.426.428.422.42321.528.28023.826.322.619.120.418.126.610021.720.423.22321.616.927.51252222.422.320.121.518.523.716025.925.121.52021.61820.320026.319.621.820.520.816.422.225022.218.925.22217.715.522.431523.223.925.123.216.214.323.740024.822.428.525.315.412.925.750024.522.430.627.813.512.227.663024.522.93531.213.511.93180022.520.633.627.912.311.529.9100021.419.732.82711.911.825.8125022.120.332.227.611.511.127.1160023.321.435.128.412.211.328.6200024.422.233.92912.511.529.3250024.823.134.830.212.511.629.9315024.422.535.330.212.912.130.2400024.422.135.530.614.312.630500021.619.333.32812.812.427.8630019.717.732.726.713.212.926.1800016.314.828.322.713.413.122.61000013.313.125.318.21312.718.31250012.912.920.214.913.412.814.71600012.71317.315.214.113.615.1SPL3533.145.540.425.424.440.3N2.21.85.13.40.70.63.4median 22.5median 20.6median 30.6median 26.7median 13.4median 12.7median 26.1Delta3.42.45.842.51.33.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Noise
7%
3%
5%
4%
off / environment *
24.4
24
2%
24.9
-2%
24.5
-0%
27.7
-14%
Idle Minimum *
24.4
24
2%
24.9
-2%
24.5
-0%
27.8
-14%
Idle Average *
24.4
24
2%
26.3
-8%
24.5
-0%
27.8
-14%
Idle Maximum *
25.5
24
6%
31.8
-25%
28
-10%
27.8
-9%
Load Average *
40.4
33.1
18%
34.3
15%
35.9
11%
27.9
31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.5
40.2
12%
34.3
25%
35.9
21%
32.8
28%
Load Maximum *
45.5
41.7
8%
37.5
18%
38.6
15%
37
19%

* ... smaller is better

温度

XPS 13 Plus的机箱在日常工作中保持舒适的温度,你也可以把它放在腿上,没有任何问题。另一方面,持续的高工作负荷或游戏会导致键盘区域的底部和顶部(沿着大热管)的表面温度升高,我们建议使用固体表面。紧凑的电源适配器在高达47°C的温度下不会过热。

在压力测试中,处理器的消耗最终平息在27W,我们没有注意到在压力测试后立即出现任何性能缺陷。

CPU/iGPU数据 压力测试
CPU/iGPU数据 压力测试
Max. Load
 39.6 °C41.1 °C39.7 °C 
 34.2 °C35.1 °C32.6 °C 
 33 °C32.2 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
47.5 °C48.8 °C46.4 °C
42.4 °C44.5 °C42 °C
36.2 °C37.2 °C36 °C
Maximum: 48.8 °C
Average: 42.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
表面温度顶部(压力测试)
表面温度顶部(压力测试)
表面温度底部(压力测试)
表面温度底部(压力测试)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-5%
7%
4%
5%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.1
47.9
-17%
42.2
-3%
44
-7%
42.8
-4%
47
-14%
Maximum Bottom *
48.8
56.1
-15%
47.5
3%
44
10%
46.9
4%
45
8%
Idle Upper Side *
28
26.8
4%
24.3
13%
27
4%
25.2
10%
27.8
1%
Idle Bottom *
29.3
27.3
7%
25.3
14%
27
8%
26
11%
28.6
2%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

戴尔为XPS 13 Plus使用了一个新的四扬声器系统,与旧的相比,质量更好。XPS 13 9310并与MacBook Air M1.声音非常丰富,视频或一些背景音乐绝对让人享受。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.837.92528.436.33122.325.14027.9325022.126.26321.523.78018.131.810016.945.912518.552.91601854.220016.458.225015.558.931514.359.640012.959.350012.261.863011.963.980011.561.3100011.863.8125011.168.7160011.372.2200011.568250011.662.2315012.166400012.667500012.467.2630012.967.1800013.166.51000012.763.11250012.861.71600013.660.8SPL24.479N0.644.9median 12.7median 62.2Delta1.3433.436.621.721.82020.62223.522.434.225.730.422.435.717.747.122.457.921.161.615.859.7156213.462.416.168.113.169.211.463.110.766.910.165.510.468.31168.71167.111.266.811.567.511.670.611.967.111.968.711.965.512.162.811.862.41160.623.979.60.547.3median 11.9median 65.523.545.142.445.137.735.437.735.230.635.232.330.632.340.329.840.334.329.934.330.629.630.63527.93549.631.949.65730.6576026.76067.120.267.167.422.867.466.819.966.870.416.670.474.215.274.273.114.873.177.114.177.175.413.975.474.313.774.371.713.671.773.713.873.770.713.370.76913.2697213.27269.113.269.168.513.468.569.713.169.766.813.166.86412.56484.627.884.664.7164.7median 69.1median 13.9median 69.143.84hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KApple MacBook Air 2020 M1 EntryDell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 4K和Alder Lake影响电池运行时间

消耗功率

紧凑型60W电源适配器
紧凑型60W电源适配器

我们已经看到,CPU可以在短时间内消耗超过50W的功率,所以在这些情况下,附带的60W电源适配器不够用也就不奇怪了。目前我们可以在许多紧凑的Alder Lake系统上观察到这个问题。然而,在这种情况下,峰值负载的持续时间非常有限,所以在实践中这不是一个大问题,电池不会放电。

不过,当你给设备施加压力时,给电池充电会非常慢。我们的空闲测量结果也显示,与之前的型号相比,消耗数字有所增加。 前一个型号消耗量增加,因为它也配备了4K显示屏。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.79 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 11 / 11.4 Watt
Load midlight 59.7 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2160x1350, 13.00
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Phison Electronics PS5012, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
20%
38%
53%
21%
25%
22%
15%
16%
Idle Minimum *
7
4.8
31%
3.3
53%
1.9
73%
4.2
40%
4.3
39%
5.7
19%
Idle Average *
11
8.7
21%
5.7
48%
6.4
42%
8.1
26%
8.3
25%
6
45%
8.46 ?(3.8 - 63, n=184)
23%
Idle Maximum *
11.4
10.1
11%
9.1
20%
7
39%
9
21%
8.8
23%
12.3
-8%
Load Average *
59.7
45.6
24%
29.6
50%
25
58%
41.7
30%
46.2
23%
44.4
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.4
42.4
14%
27.7
44%
40.1
19%
42.2
15%
36.5
26%
Load Maximum *
63
49.5
21%
55.1
13%
30.3
52%
68
-8%
47.3
25%
47.8
24%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.4 (47.4-60.7)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø54.2 (47.8-63)

Power Consumption with external screen

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø50.8 (48.3-63)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø58.8 (53.3-63)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.6 (28.1-39.8)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.3 (48-63)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49 (41.2-59.2)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø44.3 (42.7-57.4)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.64 (5.63-8.54)

电池运行时间

戴尔将电池容量从52Wh增加到55Wh,但由于消耗数字较高,电池运行时间与4K前代产品相比仍然有所下降。在150尼特(占我们评测设备最大亮度的47%)下,我们的Wi-Fi测试只运行了7个小时,在最大亮度下只运行了约5.5小时。在150尼特下,视频测试的差异特别明显,几乎可以运行11小时。这是Alder Lake CPU的结果,它在单核负载情况下也会消耗大量的电力。

旧XPS的 旧版XPS 13 9310的OLED面板在电池电量方面比其4K IPS对应产品略差,因此我们预计这一代产品也是如此。如果你正在寻找电池运行时间最好的XPS 13 Plus,我们绝对推荐标准的1200p面板(1920 x 1200像素)。

充电默认(60W PSU)。
充电默认(60W PSU)。
Charging Express(60W PSU)。
Charging Express(60W PSU)。
Charging Express(100W PSU)。
Charging Express(100W PSU)。

戴尔为电池的充电提供了不同的设置,你也可以设置手动限制。在默认设置下,需要大约160分钟,在设备开启时,电池才会被完全充满。快速模式可减少25分钟,100W PSU可再减少10分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 103)
6h 54min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 103)
5h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 48.2 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
55%
38%
132%
20%
4%
-6%
42%
H.264
657
912
39%
925
41%
661
1%
WiFi v1.3
414
550
33%
596
44%
960
132%
563
36%
430
4%
391
-6%
Load
76
146
92%
98
29%
94
24%

Pros

+ 复杂而坚固的机箱
+ 高的CPU和系统性能
+ 非常好的扬声器
+ 良好的主观画质(不含PWM
+ 霹雳火4

Cons

- 读卡器和3.5毫米立体声插孔已不复存在
- 不支持Wi-Fi 6E
- 4K面板仅覆盖sRGB色域
- 有限的维护选项
- 只有一年的保修期

结论 - XPS 13 Plus功能强大,但有其缺点

在审查中。戴尔XPS 13 Plus。测试模型由戴尔德国公司提供。
在审查中。戴尔XPS 13 Plus。测试模型由戴尔德国公司提供。

在我们对新的XPS 13 Plus进行评测之后,有很多话题我们必须要谈。戴尔不仅更新了一代处理器,而且还决定从现在开始提供两种完全不同的型号。XPS 13 Plus获得更快的英特尔Alder Lake-P芯片,以及酷睿i7-1260P在我们的审查单元中提供了良好的性能数据。然而,该设备再次显示了当前英特尔CPU的问题,因为高性能需要大量的电力。这影响了电池的运行时间以及温度,所以新的模型(即使有优化的电源配置文件)比旧的更响亮。 XPS 13 9310.GPU的性能也没有改变,AMD的Ryzen 6000 CPU就像Zenbook S 13中的一样,提供了更多的性能,也更有效率。

戴尔还延续了极简主义的趋势,因为XPS 13 Plus没有得到读卡器,甚至没有3.5毫米立体声插孔了,这意味着只剩下两个USB-C接口。由于支持Thunderbolt 4,它们的用途非常广泛,但在实践中就是不方便。在实验失败后,我们也对电容式触摸条感到惊讶,Apple 。带功能键的触摸条总体上运行良好,但这里没有附加价值,而且自动亮度控制并不总是可靠地工作。新的键盘给人留下了体面的印象,但我们非常喜欢由玻璃制成的一体式掌托区,这意味着指纹没有问题,而且很容易使用。新的声音系统也非常好,比旧型号有了改进。

新的戴尔XPS 13提供了足够的性能,但代价是风扇的声音更大,电池运行时间更短。还有一些设计决定,如键盘上方的电容式触摸条和端口方面的极简主义,会让人感到厌烦。

戴尔还必须注意不要在显示器方面与对手失之交臂,因为可选的4K屏幕只覆盖小的sRGB色域。如果你想要P3,目前你不得不获得可选的3.5K OLED面板,这在旧款中受到PWM闪烁的影响。虽然4K屏幕的主观画质仍然非常好。然而,高分辨率也影响了电池运行时间,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,5.5-7小时的电池运行时间并不是记录制动。如果你需要更长的运行时间,你肯定应该买一个全高清面板(带和不带触摸支持)。较小的问题,如缺乏6GHz的Wi-Fi支持或720p的网络摄像头也有点影响整体印象。

XPS 13 Plus必须与非常好的对手竞争。对于初学者来说,我们很想评测采用Alder Lake-U CPU和没有触摸条的标准XPS 13(我们期待几天后的评测单元)。目前的华硕笔记本S 13配有AMD Ryzen 6000 CPU,在许多方面都很出色,而XPS 13 Plus甚至难以跟上旧的Apple MacBook Air M1在某些方面,XPS 13 Plus甚至难以赶上老款MacBook Air M1,后者要便宜得多。而且我们认为,面对目前也在评测中的新MacBook Air M2,情况也不会改变。

价格和可用性

你可以从戴尔的网上商店订购XPS 13 Plus。起价为1299美元。我们的评测单元配备了酷睿i7,32GB内存,1TB固态硬盘存储和4K屏幕,价格为2099美元,可从百思买购买。,例如。

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K - 07/19/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
55 / 75 → 73%
Weight
72 / 20-75 → 95%
Battery
81%
Display
88%
Games Performance
68 / 78 → 87%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
88%
Audio
84 / 91 → 93%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Average
78%
87%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320笔记本电脑评测--XPS 13现在有了触摸条
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-07-20 (Update: 2022-07-20)