Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q(N18P-G62)是基于Turing架构的笔记本电脑的中端图形卡。 Max-Q是移动GTX 1650Ti的节能版本,具有降低的频率,性能以及功耗。它使用的是带有1024个着色器的TU117芯片。因此,它适用于轻薄游戏笔记本电脑。与性能更强的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1650 Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。

1650Ti Max-Q有两种型号,一种具有35瓦和1035-1200 MHz的频率,另一种具有40瓦的更强版本,其时钟速度为1200-1365 MHz。但是,两者的频率都明显低于具有50/55瓦和1350-1385 MHz频率的正常Max-P版本。在大多数笔记本电脑中,内存的时钟频率很有可能是1250 MHz = 10,000 MHz有效(Gbps),也有可能是1500 MHz = 12,000 Gbps的版本。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光线追踪,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可提供浮点和整数运算的并发执行,以提高现代游戏的性能。此外,对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这导致IPC增加50%,能耗比提高40%。

与较大的Turing芯片(例如GTX 1660 Ti的TU116和RTX系列)相比,TU117不包括新的NVENC编码器,而是较旧的类似于Pascal和Volta中使用的编码器。

Nvidia将1650 Ti Max-Q笔记本电脑的功耗指定为35瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比同一包装中的移动GTX 1650 Ti低25瓦(其他型号最高可达80瓦)。

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62 Max-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1035 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3015     avg: 3309     median: 3235.5 (9%)     max: 3709 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2886     avg: 3139     median: 3098 (8%)     max: 3526 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -10%
2864 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -7%
2993 -5%
2998 -4%
3074 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -1%
3123 -1%
3132 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139
3160 1%
3269 4%
3324 6%
3364 7%
3430 9%
3492 11%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 12%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 14%
3601 15%
...
19434 519%
max:
36485 1062%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
421834 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
34142 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18333     avg: 22116     median: 22895 (24%)     max: 26161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 29035     avg: 42978     median: 47657 (13%)     max: 53539 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7292     avg: 7764     median: 7700 (14%)     max: 8659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8024     avg: 8542     median: 8564 (10%)     max: 9573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
21348 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10610     avg: 11524     median: 11398 (16%)     max: 13121 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11055     avg: 11796     median: 11538 (10%)     max: 13343 Points
171.8 -99%
...
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -10%
10730 -9%
10748 -9%
10952 -7%
11119 -6%
11171 -5%
11305 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -3%
11795 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796
11823 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 1%
11915 1%
12066 2%
12196 3%
12289 4%
12479 6%
12583 7%
12708 8%
...
59943 408%
max:
106023 799%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
31116 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
33179 Points (19%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
29844 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 -10%
30252 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 -5%
31800 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 -3%
32473 -2%
32473 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
33179
33321 0%
33740 2%
33810 2%
34450 4%
34680 5%
34951 5%
35209 6%
35286 6%
35807 8%
...
132443 299%
max:
170928 415%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
30266 Points (40%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
64.9 fps (22%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 83.9     avg: 132.8     median: 140 (8%)     max: 145 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6297 points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 66.7     median: 65.2 (9%)     max: 75 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.8     avg: 63.3     median: 63 (9%)     max: 67.3 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 60.6     avg: 72     median: 68.6 (15%)     max: 94 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3568     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (44%)     max: 0.522 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4161     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (37%)     max: 0.4716 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34.5     avg: 40.9     median: 42 (67%)     max: 47 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1340     avg: 1405     median: 1405 (55%)     max: 1470 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
998 MHz (40%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
63.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70 77 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 36 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
97.5 105.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.5 46.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7 39.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
47 63 74 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30 38 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 24 32 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 12 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70 89 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 54 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37 39 47 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
210  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
202  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
192.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
165.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
129.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94.8 115.7 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.5 51.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9 30.5 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
154.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
80 99 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 40 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
85.6 99.6 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.6 60.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 56.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.5 54.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
211  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
162.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
145.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
115.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
102.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
104.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155.9 164.3 176 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 57.5 60.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4 36 36.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 21.6 31.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
89.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
195.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
143.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
97.2 102 106 112 115 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.8 55 55 56 64 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 44 46 52.5 55 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34 37 40 43.3 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
100
90
92
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
167 188 196 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.6 76.5 81.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.9 62.2 65.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.9 53.6 55.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
90 102 115 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46 56 64 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42 51 60 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39 47 48 56 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27 38 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
62
54
low 1280x720
79 80.2 85.9 86.6 86.8 91.2 92.6 93.9 96.4 97.5 98 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.5 71.9 72.8 73.5 78.2 79.2 79.4 80.7 83.5 83.9 87.5 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5 62.6 62.7 63.1 66.4 66.7 67.5 69.7 70.6 70.8 72.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.2 49.2 52.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72 90.1 94 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.3 46.3 48.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.1 32.5 33.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
89.7 163.4 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.7 107.4 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.1 60.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.9 49.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.9 22.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118 128 130 137 140 140 142 143 143 144 147 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112 116 117 118 118 119 121 124 124 127 129 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 107 109 111 111 112 113 115 117 117 121 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101 103 104 104 105 106 107 108 108 109 110 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.5 51.5 58.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
144.3 153 153.2 156.8 159.5 167.9 183 198.6 199 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76.3 87.3 90 92 92 100.3 117 127 132 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.9 52.6 52.8 53.6 53.8 54.9 55 56.4 61 66 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.3 29.8 30.1 30.7 31.5 32.5 34.8 35 36.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.8 19.3 21.3 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
83.2
67.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
156 167 171 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
145 157 164 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.2 88.1 91.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.1 45.3 45.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
12.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
161
134
152
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
169
142
158
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 1.063.73326.822.2
Immortals Fenyx Rising744735292414
Yakuza Like a Dragon10145433825.412.4
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War10055.644.140.225.810.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla61382510125
Watch Dogs Legion8049411614
FIFA 21210202192.9165.2129.679.6
Star Wars Squadrons222124112.9103.47030.7
Mafia Definitive Edition93.946.24327.914.1
Serious Sam 410550392622.3
Crysis Remastered154.159.831.923.6
Horizon Zero Dawn90504036308
Death Stranding9357545235.916.8
F1 202021110782574122
Gears Tactics162.973.744.433.423.513.5
Doom Eternal145.191.252.6
Hunt Showdown115.750.141.8
Escape from Tarkov120.771.252.847
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order63.353.246
Need for Speed Heat61.849.345.833.9
GRID 201911476.964.327.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint74453422
Borderlands 3102.852.634.726.1
Control104.739.229.1
F1 2019171897162
Total War: Three Kingdoms165583524
Anno 180089.465.841.121.5
The Division 293514130
Dirt Rally 2.0195.963.155.138.1
Far Cry New Dawn89565349
Metro Exodus83.140.129.823.2
Apex Legends143.786.268.762.9
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey63494119
Shadow of the Tomb Raider10657484015
Strange Brigade1847661523521.4
Far Cry 51025551483316
X-Plane 11.1190786747
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark85443119.310.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider12796594921
Dota 2 Reborn13712011310650
The Witcher 3168102553220
GTA V16515584432624.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


25
16

24
14
4
4
28
9
1
13
18
4
1
10
5
1
1
16
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 23. 10:22:24

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.045s ... 0.046s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.048s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.049s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.049s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 10309 +0.015s ... 0.063s

#17 got single benchmarks 10309 +0.051s ... 0.114s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.678s ... 0.792s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.792s

#21 Got 406 rows for game benchmarks. +0.062s ... 0.855s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.855s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 0.887s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +2.049s ... 2.936s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.941s

#26 return log +0s ... 2.941s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics card

RazerBlade Stealth 13 2021年的回顾。采用OLED面板的移动游戏机

RazerBlade Stealth 13 2021年的回顾。采用OLED面板的移动游戏机

Razer提供了其紧凑的Blade Stealth 13,除了熟悉的IPS显示屏外,还有一个OLED屏幕。这提供了像极快的响应时间和伟大的画面这样的优势,但也有像PWM闪烁以及电池寿命明显缩短这样的劣势。...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 13.30" | 1.5 kg
雷蛇灵刃潜行版GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q笔记本电脑评测:把2019版本搞对了

雷蛇灵刃潜行版GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q笔记本电脑评测:把2019版本搞对了

在摸索了2019年的版本之后,2020年的Blade Stealth成为了2019年的版本应该有的样子,特别是就Ice Lake处理器而言。 考虑到较小的13.3英寸机身,图形处理能力非常强大。 ...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 13.30" | 1.5 kg

HP Envy 14-eb0021tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0021tx

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED

MSI Summit E14 A11SCS: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E14 A11SCS

MSI Prestige 14 A11SCS-036DC: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A11SCS-036DC

MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-1051XES: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-1051XES

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6200T: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6200T

HP Envy 14-eb0003ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0003ns

MSI Summit E15 A11SCS-091AU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCS-091AU

MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-876XES: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-876XES

MSI Prestige 15 A11SCS-033XES: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SCS-033XES

HP Envy 14-eb0775ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0775ng

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-067RU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-067RU

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513: Intel Core i7-10750H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-227ID: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-227ID

Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30009GE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30009GE

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST

HP Envy 14-eb0010nr: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0010nr

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3, i7-10850H, 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10850H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3, i7-1850H, 1650 Ti Max-Q

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3-20TK000NGE: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3-20TK000NGE

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LI-E3089T: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LI-E3089T

HP Spectre x360 15-eb0036ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 15-eb0036ng

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel

MSI GF63 10SCSR-243: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 10SCSR-243

Dell XPS 15 9500 i7-10750H, 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9500 i7-10750H, 1650 Ti Max-Q

Razer Blade Stealth 2020, i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth 2020, i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-07-28)