Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q(N18P-G62)是基于Turing架构的笔记本电脑的中端图形卡。 Max-Q是移动GTX 1650Ti的节能版本,具有降低的频率,性能以及功耗。它使用的是带有1024个着色器的TU117芯片。因此,它适用于轻薄游戏笔记本电脑。与性能更强的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1650 Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。

1650Ti Max-Q有两种型号,一种具有35瓦和1035-1200 MHz的频率,另一种具有40瓦的更强版本,其时钟速度为1200-1365 MHz。但是,两者的频率都明显低于具有50/55瓦和1350-1385 MHz频率的正常Max-P版本。在大多数笔记本电脑中,内存的时钟频率很有可能是1250 MHz = 10,000 MHz有效(Gbps),也有可能是1500 MHz = 12,000 Gbps的版本。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光线追踪,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可提供浮点和整数运算的并发执行,以提高现代游戏的性能。此外,对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这导致IPC增加50%,能耗比提高40%。

与较大的Turing芯片(例如GTX 1660 Ti的TU116和RTX系列)相比,TU117不包括新的NVENC编码器,而是较旧的类似于Pascal和Volta中使用的编码器。

Nvidia将1650 Ti Max-Q笔记本电脑的功耗指定为35瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比同一包装中的移动GTX 1650 Ti低25瓦(其他型号最高可达80瓦)。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62 Max-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1035 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 3193     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (22%)     max: 3235 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
3098 Points (21%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
34142 Points (5%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
19073 Points (29%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
30436 Points (16%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 7356     avg: 7478     median: 7478 (25%)     max: 7600 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
8093 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
11070 points (29%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
11501 points (22%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M -11%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire 14%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
9546 Samples/s (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
10809 Samples/s (100%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
6297 Points (22%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
62.4 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
67.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
72.9 Watt (16%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
162.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
145.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
115.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
102.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
104.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
89.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
195.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare