Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarGPD Pocket 3可转换UMPC回顾。比许多英特尔EVO笔记本电脑更快
在今年早些时候令人失望的Win Max游戏混合型UMPC之后，新的GPD Pocket 3是在一个更传统的UMPC上的回归，没有任何集成的游戏手柄按钮。相反，Pocket 3具有一个可旋转的触摸屏，就像以前的惠普tx1000或联想ThinkPad Twist一样，可以在笔记本模式和平板电脑模式之间切换。
对于这样一个16:10的8英寸小尺寸来说，核心规格令人印象深刻，因为该系统由最新的英特尔Evo笔记本电脑上的相同硬件驱动。Tiger Lake-U Core i7-1195G7 CPU，Iris Xe GPU，1200p IPS显示屏，Thunderbolt 4，甚至PCIe4 NVMe SSD都可以在这里得到最高端配置。另外，低端选项则是用奔腾N6000代替。
我们的测试装置是一个更高端的酷睿i7预生产装置，它缺少最终零售型号的一些辅助功能。尽管如此，它仍然准确地代表了用户在性能和显示质量方面对最终机型的期望。用户可以查看官方的Pocket 3 Indiegogo页面了解完整的规格。
更多GPD评论。
GPD Pocket 3
Processor
Intel Core i7-1195G7 4 x 2.9 - 5 GHz, 25 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, LPDDR4x, 30.0.100.9955
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR4x-4266, 2133 MHz, 20-20-20-45, Dual-Channel
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, Digital Flat Panel, IPS, MS_0000, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, 1024 GB
Weight
730 g, Power Supply: 168 g
Price
1000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.3 % | 11/2021 | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 730 g | 20 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 79.3 % | 08/2021 | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 850 g | 26 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 | |||
| 88.5 % | 04/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 14.5 mm | 12.30" | 1920x1280 | |
| 86.7 % | 10/2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.35 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 89.4 % | 02/2021 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.2 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 |
外壳 - 流线型，大部分都很坚固
GPD在Pocket 3、Win Max和Win 3之间使用相同的金属底盘材料，使该系列之间的感觉和质地相似。虽然底座很坚固，但旋转的触摸屏连接在一个非常小的关节上，随着时间的推移，感觉很容易减弱或断裂。这是我们必须在一年的时间里进行更彻底的测试，看看这个关节是否能承受住持续使用。
没有任何集成的控制器按钮，使得8英寸Pocket 3在三个方面都比8英寸Win Max更轻更小。
连接性 - 需要更多的USB-C端口
端口选项多种多样，只有一个恼人的限制：只有一个USB-C端口用于Thunderbolt 4和充电。因此，如果上述设备不支持USB充电直通，连接外部显示器、扩展坞或外部图形可能会妨碍你为Pocket 3充电。较小的Pentium Pocket 3 SKU不支持Thunderbolt。
Pocket 3的独特之处在于它的KVM端口，如右图所示，可以转换为HDMI输入或USB输入。然后，用户将能够用集成的Pocket 3键盘控制外部设备，或使用内部显示器来连接外部主机。
虽然我们的预生产测试装置不包括一个，但GPD说零售型号将集成一个MicroSD读卡器。
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1144 (1084-1189)
GPD Pocket 3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1058 (914-1225)
网络摄像头 - 偏离中心
来自200万像素网络摄像头的图像质量比许多其他笔记本电脑更清晰，但色彩准确性仍然很差。网络摄像头也偏离了中心，因为它在显示屏的左上角，而不是顶部中心。也没有网络摄像头快门或红外摄像头。
28.5 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
31 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
维护
只用一把飞利浦螺丝刀就可以轻松地拆除底板。只有M.2固态硬盘和电池可以被维修。
配件和保修
某些捆绑产品包括可拆卸的KVM模块和一支有源手写笔。适用一年有限保修，但用户必须支付运费。
输入设备--对于尺寸来说，令人惊讶的好。
键盘
有趣的是，这些按键比Win Max上的按键略微点击和响亮，以获得相对更舒适的输入体验。用户将不得不习惯于不可避免的小面积。
触摸板
小的触摸板（约6.3 x 3.3厘米）工作可靠，无论滑行速度如何，都没有跳跃或跳动。GPD表示，最终的零售单位将采用玻璃（磨砂石膏）触摸板，而不是我们预生产单位的磨砂塑料。同时，鼠标按键安静而牢固，按下时有适当的行程。
显示 - 清晰而多彩
由于高PPI，8英寸1200p面板的显示质量很清晰。颜色和亮度介于Win Max和Win 3之间，对于办公室类型的工作和多媒体播放来说应该是绰绰有余。不幸的是，颜色覆盖面比许多中档超极本要窄，因为在中档超极本中，大于95%的sRGB已经成为标准。 因此，不建议使用内部显示屏进行任何严肃的图形编辑。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Digital Flat Panel tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 438.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 420.6 cd/m² Minimum: 10.11 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 438.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1096:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.05
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
52.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| GPD Pocket 3 Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00 | GPD Win Max 2021 LT7911D, IPS, 1280x800, 8.00 | GPD Win 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 N123NCA-GS1, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.30 | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 LG Philips LGD0663, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | 17% | 31% | 35% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 51.1 | 47.2 -8% | 59.5 16% | 67 31% | 69.7 36% | 65.8 29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 74.7 | 65.2 -13% | 89.6 20% | 99.2 33% | 99 33% | 98.2 31% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 52.8 | 47.6 -10% | 61.4 16% | 68.8 30% | 71.7 36% | 67.9 29% |
| Response Times | -37% | 5% | -43% | -39% | -47% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.2 ? | 56.8 ? -53% | 40 ? -8% | 63.2 ? -70% | 55.6 ? -49% | 62 ? -67% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 37.6 ? -21% | 25.6 ? 18% | 36 ? -15% | 40.4 ? -29% | 39.6 ? -27% |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 2500 ? | ||||
| Screen | -15% | -29% | 45% | 17% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 438.4 | 374.6 -15% | 468.8 7% | 419 -4% | 555.7 27% | 443.5 1% |
| Brightness | 421 | 361 -14% | 460 9% | 406 -4% | 528 25% | 394 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 92 0% | 93 1% | 94 2% | 90 -2% | 78 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.45 -13% | 0.45 -13% | 0.23 42% | 0.35 12% | 0.17 57% |
| Contrast | 1096 | 832 -24% | 1042 -5% | 1822 66% | 1588 45% | 2609 138% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 6.21 -24% | 9 -79% | 1.1 78% | 4.83 4% | 2.7 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.59 | 9.89 -3% | 15.5 -62% | 2.2 77% | 8.46 12% | 4.36 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.05 | 5.4 -33% | 1.91 53% | 0.5 88% | 0.76 81% | 2.61 36% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.5 -13% | 10.9 -173% | 1.5 62% | 6.1 -53% | 3.4 15% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.49 88% | 2.13 103% | 2.06 107% | 1.98 111% | 2.09 105% |
| CCT | 7087 92% | 6726 97% | 10972 59% | 6524 100% | 6686 97% | 6144 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | 62.8 | 62.1 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 99.2 | 98.5 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-17% | -2% /
-14% | 11% /
30% | 4% /
13% | 6% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
默认色温偏冷，色调略微偏蓝。其他方面的颜色校准得很好，在我们的校准工作前后没有大的差异。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
由于两台设备的对比度几乎相同，因此户外可视性与Win 3最为相似。眩光在光泽的触摸屏上基本上是不可避免的，因此用户会想增加字体的缩放比例，以便更容易阅读。如果在阳光直射下，颜色会被冲淡。
性能 - 高度依赖于BIOS设置
测试条件
处理器的功率限制可以通过BIOS菜单调整。在我们的基准测试中，我们使用制造商提供的默认功率设置（PL1=15，PL2=20），如下图所示。如果需要，用户可以选择以更高的功率限制（PL1=20，PL2=25）或更低的功率限制（PL1=12，PL2=15）运行处理器。我们将比较用户在默认和更高的功率设置之间能有什么不同。
处理器
多线程CPU性能大约比平均水平慢30%到35%。 Core i7-1195G7在我们的数据库中，当运行在默认的BIOS电源级别时，多线程CPU的性能比平均的Core i7-1195G7慢30%到35%。如果在较高的BIOS电源水平上运行，这一性能差距将变得更窄，只有10%。反过来说，单线程性能在两个电源级别设置之间变化不大。
从较低的 奔腾N6000SKU将使CPU的原始性能提高2至3倍。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø655 (525.83-745.35)
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø570 (564.07-573.67)
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U: Ø1274 (1269.36-1281.19)
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø716 (710.19-722.13)
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø528 (426.12-863.97)
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø653 (481.71-762.89)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC -10! | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 -2! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 -2! | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 -2! | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro -2! | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng -2! | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 -2! | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (3142 - 6806, n=9) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1290 - 1624, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1212 - 2590, n=9) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (498 - 620, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (574 - 999, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (198 - 238, n=8) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (473 - 1211, n=10) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (17053 - 26183, n=9) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (5059 - 5890, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4241 - 6349, n=7) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1519 - 1649, n=7) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4.23 - 8.8, n=9) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (39.2 - 83.9, n=9) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (0.53 - 0.611, n=9) | |
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4378 - 7361, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (20576 - 30422, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1310 - 2026, n=9) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (38530 - 56262, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (3209 - 4937, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (12142 - 18123, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (30854 - 70936, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (231 - 399, n=10) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (2300 - 3949, n=9) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (13455 - 35235, n=9) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
系统性能
尽管在BIOS默认的功率水平上，CPU和GPU的性能低于平均水平，但PCMark的得分却很出色。我们赞赏该系统没有装载任何臃肿的软件。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5067 - 5406, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10156 - 10614, n=6) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6637 - 7390, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4737 - 5941, n=6) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5153 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (23332 - 57053, n=10) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (24068 - 53332, n=10) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (22151 - 59019, n=10) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (69.8 - 114.4, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时没有DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅，也没有丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 完全支持PCIe4 x4驱动器
根据CrystalDiskMark 5的测试，我们的1TB BIWIN NQ200 硬盘的连续读取和写入率最高分别为3500 MB/s和2800 MB/s。然而，根据我们的DiskSpd循环测试，由于该硬盘缺乏散热片，所以性能在几分钟后就迅速下降。
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3439 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2787 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
768 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
549 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3058 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2597 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
79.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
273.4 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
GPU性能 - Iris Xe
在BIOS默认功率水平下的图形性能令人失望，比平均速度慢30%至35%。 Iris Xe 96 EUs在我们的数据库中。幸运的是，在较高的BIOS电源水平上运行将提高我们的GPU，使其符合我们期望的Iris Xe 96 EUs的平均性能。例如，在较高的功率级别上运行3DMark 11，将返回6350分的GPU得分，而如果在默认的功率级别上则只有2942分。在游戏时也可以观察到类似的差异。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E -1! | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7471, n=193) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| HP Envy 13-ba0001ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3112 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14656 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2770 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 880 points | |
Help | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=174) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 28, n=170) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=163) | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
GPD Pocket 3: Ø46.5 (40-50)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 66.1 | 61.3 | 20.6 | 8.99 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.3 | 36.8 | 21.2 | 10.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95.9 | 68.9 | 45.4 | 41.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 27.7 | 16.8 | 11.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22 | 18.8 | 19 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 44 | 28 | 25 | 24 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 70.6 | 32.4 | 26.7 | 21.8 |
排放
系统噪音 - 负载时的高音调
在触摸板旁边有一个涡轮风扇模式键。如果启用，在浏览网页或播放视频时，风扇的脉冲频率将高达31.4 dB(A)，而静音背景为23.4 dB(A)。因此，建议在运行低负载或在对噪音敏感的环境中工作时关闭该模式。
在运行游戏等高负荷时，即使在较高的BIOS功率水平设置下，风扇噪音最大也只有不到41 dB(A)。虽然风扇的声音有些高，但至少在类似条件下，它总体上比Win Max或Win 3更安静。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 25.6 / 25.6 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 40.7 / dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38.3 / 40.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512 | GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -13% | 3% | 1% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 23.4 | 23.3 -0% | 27.4 -17% | 25.1 -7% | 24.3 -4% | 25.8 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 26.6 -9% | 29.1 -20% | 25.1 -3% | 24.8 -2% | 25.9 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 25.6 | 26.6 -4% | 29.1 -14% | 25.1 2% | 24.8 3% | 25.9 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.6 | 26.6 -4% | 29.1 -14% | 26 -2% | 24.8 3% | 25.9 -1% |
| Load Average * | 38.3 | 46.9 -22% | 40.7 -6% | 34.6 10% | 38 1% | 26.4 31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.7 | 49 -20% | 42.8 -5% | 34.6 15% | 38 7% | 36.9 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.7 | 49.2 -21% | 46.3 -14% | 37 9% | 41.5 -2% | 41.5 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
热点更多地集中在机箱的后部，以便尽可能地保持键盘按键的温度。靠近右上角的专用鼠标按键在运行游戏等高要求的负载时可以达到40℃以上。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class UMPC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F, ranging from 30 to 55 °C for the class UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.6 °C / 101 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F, ranging from 30 to 55 °C for the class UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.6 °C / 101 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
| GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Envy 13-ba0001ng Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 11% | 1% | -1% | 16% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 38 6% | 39 3% | 51 -26% | 40.4 -0% | 38 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.4 | 36.4 8% | 41.7 -6% | 45.4 -15% | 52.8 -34% | 37.1 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.6 | 30 8% | 25.6 21% | 24.4 25% | 27.2 17% | 24.5 25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34.4 | 28 19% | 25.6 26% | 27.4 20% | 29.2 15% | 25 27% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
我们在BIOS默认的功率水平上对系统进行强调，以显示与更高的功率水平设置相比，它可以慢多少。例如，运行Prime95，显示CPU稳定在1.5至1.8 GHz，而配备类似Core i7 CPU的XPG Xenia 14则为3.2 GHz。我们的Iris Xe GPU也将稳定在500 MHz，而上述XPG在运行时为1300 MHz。 Witcher 3.
用电池运行不会影响性能。在电池电源和较高的BIOS电源水平上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为9082和6618分，而在主电源上则为8889和6350分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲（默认功率水平） | -- | -- | 41 |
| Prime95压力（默认功率水平） | 1.5 - 1.8 | -- | 53 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力（默认功率水平） | 1.5 | 100 | 54 |
| Witcher 3 压力 (默认功率水平) | 0.5 - 1.5 | 500 | 53 |
扬声器 - 高音量，低质量
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
GPD Pocket 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
我们下面的功耗读数是在较高的BIOS功率水平设置下进行的。在桌面上空转时的总体消耗量比预期的要高，为9瓦至12瓦。否则，在运行游戏等高负荷时，消耗量仍然稳定在36瓦至42瓦之间。
小型USB-C交流适配器（约6.5 x 5.5 x 2.8厘米）的额定输出功率高达65瓦，对Pocket 3来说是绰绰有余。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.96 / 1.22 Watt |
| Idle | 9.6 / 11 / 11.8 Watt |
| Load |
39 / 42 Watt |
   
| |
| GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00 | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512, IPS, 1280x800, 8.00 | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB, IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.30 | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 36% | 22% | 29% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.6 | 5.2 46% | 2.9 70% | 4 58% | 2.6 73% | 3 69% |
| Idle Average * | 11 | 6.5 41% | 4.5 59% | 5.9 46% | 6.4 42% | 5.1 54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.8 | 7.4 37% | 4.5 62% | 8.3 30% | 7.7 35% | 6.4 46% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 37.2 5% | 38.5 1% | 30.1 23% | 29.9 23% | 39.6 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.4 | 38.1 -5% | 28.9 21% | 30.8 15% | 32.2 12% | 39.6 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 39 7% | 41.4 1% | 59 -40% | 47.5 -13% | 56.2 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
GPD Pocket 3; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø36.4 (35.1-37.2)
GPD Pocket 3; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36 (32.9-41.9)
电池寿命--对于尺寸和性能来说很好
考虑到小的外形因素，电池容量很小，只有38Wh，这是可以理解的。运行时间也比许多笔记本电脑短，实际使用WLAN的时间只有6个小时，而像XPS 13或Spectre 13这样配备类似的Tiger Lake-U CPU的机型则为10小时或以上。
使用附带的适配器从空电到满电的充电时间非常慢，大约为2.5小时，而大多数笔记本电脑为1.5小时。
| GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 Wh | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 42 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 54% | 88% | 37% | 79% | 96% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 360 | 555 54% | 675 88% | 492 37% | 643 79% | 707 96% |
| Load | 79 | 119 | 205 | 145 | ||
| H.264 | 597 | |||||
| Reader / Idle | 1525 | 2185 |
Pros
+ 在BIOS高功率级别设置下，CPU和GPU性能良好
+ 键盘和触摸板按钮的良好反馈
+ 集成RS-232和2.5Gbit RJ-45接口
+ 时尚的金属机箱设计
+ 易于维修
Cons
- 在高负荷运行时，风扇发出高调的噪音
- 只有一个USB-C接口用于充电和数据
- 电池小；电池寿命一般
- 显示屏铰链可以更牢固
- 充电速度慢
结论 - 比预期的好得多
GPD提供相对小众的产品，如搭载AMD的PC游戏 Win Max掌上电脑或更小的5.5英寸英特尔驱动的 Win 3 UMPC带滑出式键盘。Pocket 3是该公司最通用的产品，其性能和功能足以补充甚至取代日常超极本。这款超便携系统的几乎所有东西都运作得出奇的好，从它的咔嗒声键盘到它的各种端口和明亮的显示屏，给人留下了极佳的印象。
如果你追求性能，那么一定要通过BIOS启用更高的功率限制，以完全解锁Tiger Lake-U CPU。否则，该处理器的性能将大大降低，特别是在图形方面。
Pocket 3是GPD迄今为止在生产力、人体工程学和可用性方面最好的产品。它提供的性能和功能与许多两倍于它的超极本大致相同。
有几个特点可以改进。特别是旋转铰链可以更强壮、更坚硬，以获得更好的寿命。同时，不对称的网络摄像头定位感觉像是事后才想到的，而尖锐的扬声器对于多媒体用途来说是不令人满意的。由于散热不良，PCIe4固态硬盘的性能很快就被扼杀了，考虑到电池容量小，系统充电速度慢是意料之外的。第二个USB-C端口将使该系统更加通用，特别是在对接方面。
价格和可用性
见官方Indiegogo页面了解更多关于价格层级和发布日期的信息。
GPD Pocket 3
-
11/16/2021 v7
Allen Ngo
UMPC - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
