Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 840M

AMD Radeon 840M

Radeon 840M是一款相当强大的 RDNA 3.5 架构 iGPU,于 2025 年初在 Krakan Point APU 中首次亮相,是 Radeon 740M.它的引擎盖下仅有一些不同之处,如更快的缓存;其 4CUs/WGPs (256 个统一着色器)运行频率高达 2,900 MHz。

它支持 DX12 Ultimate、光线追踪、AI 图像生成和其他现代功能,还支持许多流行的视频编解码器,首先包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是,最新加入的 VVC 编解码器不支持硬件。支持 Miracast 和 FreeSync。iGPU 可同时驱动多达 4 台显示器,分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。

预计 AMD 将在 2027 年之前完全支持基于 RDNA 3.5 的 GPU。

性能

其游戏性能足以在低图形设置下玩 2024 款游戏。从规格上看,840M 应该比一般的 Radeon 740M.

功耗

Krakan Point 芯片采用单芯片设计,这意味着 iGPU 与 CPU 内核采用相同的台积电 N4P 工艺制造,因此能效高于平均水平(截至 2024 年底)。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines256 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
Man. Technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 740M
CPU in Radeon 840MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 5 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 4456 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2800 - 2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.1 pt (6%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -97%
...
AMD Radeon 660M
1.827 -13%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
1.886 -10%
1.888 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
1.898 -10%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
1.911 -9%
1.931 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
1.962 -7%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
1.981 -6%
2.07 -1%
AMD Radeon 840M
2.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.11 0%
2.19 4%
2.22 6%
2.27 8%
2.28 9%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.37 13%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.37 13%
2.45 17%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.45 17%
...
19 805%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1486%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
5208 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5606 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
236090 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1928 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1705 Points (3%)
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -94%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P620
1388 -19%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
1395 -18%
AMD Radeon 660M
1450 -15%
1491 -13%
1496 -12%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
1614 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
1615 -5%
1616 -5%
1672 -2%
AMD Radeon 840M
1705
1724 1%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
1735 2%
1769 4%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
1788 5%
1796 5%
1810 6%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
1814 6%
1865 9%
1989 17%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 1265%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 2527%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
26645 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
37360 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
8814 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
8453 Points (6%)
171.8 -98%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
7970 -6%
8067 -5%
8129 -4%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
8133 -4%
8133 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
8289 -2%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -1%
AMD Radeon 840M
8453
8553 1%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 5%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
9106 8%
9448 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 13%
9634 14%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 708%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1435%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
28720 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24793 Points (14%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
23042 -7%
23092 -7%
23936 -3%
23989 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
24205 -2%
24335 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
24457 -1%
24558 -1%
24697 0%
AMD Radeon 840M
24793
24915 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
24931 1%
25270 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
25293 2%
25623 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
25664 4%
AMD FirePro W7170M
25898 4%
26569 7%
26936 9%
...
132443 434%
max:
173912 601%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
34953 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
20280 points (14%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
181.3 fps (11%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
25 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
56 fps (10%)
3.3 -94%
...
45 -20%
45.07 -20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -14%
48.6 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -12%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -11%
51.3 -8%
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 -8%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -6%
AMD Radeon 840M
56
57.2 2%
57.6 3%
61.4 10%
62.7 12%
62.7 12%
62.8 12%
62.9 12%
63.8 14%
64.7 16%
...
530 846%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
139.4 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
13004 points (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
22639 points (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
367 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
720 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4356 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.9 Watt (7%)
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
54.8 Watt (15%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.6 Watt (7%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (1%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
78.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
7.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
5.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
162.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
113.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
84.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
11.6
low 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
131.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
61.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
167.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
124.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
163.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 7413625
Anno 117: Pax Romana17.211.48.1
ARC Raiders39.821.715.3
The Outer Worlds 216.412.28.9
Borderlands 48.717.45.84
F1 25433424
Doom: The Dark Ages8.156.33
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered10.99.59
Assassin's Creed Shadows12119
Civilization 778.539.120.1
Monster Hunter Wilds12.49.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 223.817.113.9
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle13.8
Stalker 211.910.18.1
Until Dawn25.916.110.5
Space Marine 215.913.812.2
Star Wars Outlaws7.56.635.29
F1 24443827
Senua's Saga Hellblade 210.58.786.43
Ghost of Tsushima20.115.913.2
Horizon Forbidden West18.215.410.6
Dragon's Dogma 215.311.3
Helldivers 222.516.714.7
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.8113.5
Counter-Strike 284.46829.6
Cyberpunk 207724.818.415.212.2
Baldur's Gate 323.118.613.312.8
Strange Brigade131.950.641.134.2
X-Plane 11.11594236.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark61.125.616.7
Dota 2 Reborn167.5124.573.766
GTA V163.2151.545.418.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
20
5
3
3
20
6
1
3
23
3
2
3
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 13. 21:02:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:31:10 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.015s ... 0.018s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.019s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12990 +0.033s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 12990 +0.015s ... 0.066s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +1.71s ... 1.776s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.776s

#16 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 1.786s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.786s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 1.803s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.257s ... 2.059s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.127s ... 2.186s

#21 return log +0s ... 2.186s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 840M graphics card

联想 Yoga 7 二合一 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测:Zen 5 向英特尔发起挑战

联想 Yoga 7 二合一 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测:Zen 5 向英特尔发起挑战

联想推出的 Yoga 7 二合一笔记本电脑不仅如其名称所示,是一款用途极为广泛的笔记本电脑,而且有多种配置可供选择。我们选择了一款搭载之前未测试过的 Ryzen AI 5 340 的机型,并将其性能与同类产品进行了比较。
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M, 14", 1.4 kg

Asus Zenbook 14 UM3406GA: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UM3406GA

Asus Vivobook S14 M3407GA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 华硕 Vivobook S14 M3407GA

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 0 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP10

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng

Dell 14 Plus DB14255: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus DB14255

Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M

HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter