Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

带有Max-Q设计的NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060是移动GeForce RTX 2060的低功耗版本。因此,它是适用于轻薄笔记本电脑的高端游戏图形卡。它与RTX 2060使用相同的芯片,但频率降低且功耗更低。它于2020年与Zephyrus G14游戏笔记本电脑一起发布。

通过更新,Nvidia还重新设计了Max-Q技术以提高效率。低压GDDR6(时钟频率较低,但GPU的余量更大)和改进的稳压器效率将提高每瓦性能。 OEM还可以实现两个新的可选功能。 Max-Q Dynamic Boost能够按帧将功耗从CPU转移到GPU,以提高整体性能。此外,笔记本电脑制造商还可以通过动态显示开关(硬件)实施Advanced Optimus,以启用Optimus,G-SYNC和高刷新率显示(最高4K 120 Hz)。

与常规GTX 1080相比,频率并不是唯一的区别。针对Max-Q版本的驱动器针对效率进行了优化(而非性能;仅针对Max-Q型号进行了优化),针对1V运行,高端冷却方法以及风扇噪声限制为40 dB的驱动优化了电压转换器(并进行时钟调整以确保始终如此)。

由于降低了频率,因此性能应略低于正常RTX 2060。它应该最适合高特效的1080p游戏。但是,光线追踪功能可能会大大降低帧率,因此使用光线追踪将仅限于某些游戏。

该芯片的额定TGP为65瓦左右,因此明显低于常规RTX 2060 Mobile的80-90瓦。

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G1 MAX-Q TU106
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1920 - unified
Core Speed975 - 1185 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed11000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption65 Watt
technology12 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.8 pt (20%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -99%
...
5.99 -12%
6.08 -10%
6.09 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6.2 -9%
6.68 -2%
6.69 -1%
6.72 -1%
6.75 -1%
6.76 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
6.79
7.44 10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.77 14%
7.85 16%
7.9 16%
8.04 18%
8.29 22%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
8.41 24%
8.49 25%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
9.02 33%
...
21.1 211%
max:
33.3 390%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5390     avg: 5813     median: 5844.5 (17%)     max: 6171 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5357     avg: 5637     median: 5638.5 (15%)     max: 5914 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -98%
...
4517 -20%
4546 -19%
4661 -17%
4687 -17%
5089 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
5132 -9%
5151 -9%
5177 -8%
5464 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
5637
5653 0%
5702 1%
5830 3%
5869 4%
5934 5%
6206 10%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
6422 14%
6745 20%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6764 20%
...
19434 245%
max:
36485 547%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
308872 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
95079 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25407     avg: 31253     median: 30659.5 (33%)     max: 38287 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38074     avg: 58101     median: 58890 (15%)     max: 76551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12716     avg: 13699     median: 13716 (24%)     max: 14649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 14129     avg: 14900     median: 14909.5 (17%)     max: 15650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
95273 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 16516     avg: 17896     median: 18065 (25%)     max: 18937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18863     avg: 19881     median: 19778.5 (17%)     max: 21105 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
50957 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
49207 Points (28%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 -12%
43587 -11%
44188 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 -8%
45988 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 -5%
46945 -5%
47209 -4%
47227 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
49207
51344 4%
51396 4%
52230 6%
52733 7%
52917 8%
53510 9%
54830 11%
58792 19%
60089 22%
...
132443 169%
max:
170928 247%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
37332 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
11800 points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
76.3 fps (26%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 104.1     avg: 132.3     median: 137 (8%)     max: 151 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
273 fps (31%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
411.3 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
497.9 fps (29%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1123 fps (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2664 Samples/s (12%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5786 Samples/s (10%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 96.6     avg: 116.3     median: 116.3 (17%)     max: 136 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 107.5     avg: 120.8     median: 120.8 (17%)     max: 134 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 99.2     avg: 110.6     median: 108.9 (24%)     max: 125.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4858     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (51%)     max: 0.566 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4694     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (42%)     max: 0.543 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 41.3     avg: 49.4     median: 51.3 (82%)     max: 53.7 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1418 MHz (56%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1171 MHz (46%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
257.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
194.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
78.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
157.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
183.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
196  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
201.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
81.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
154  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
276.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
143.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118 118 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75 84 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65 74 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
111
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
276  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
104.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.9 102 103 111 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.9 90 90.7 97.8 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.7 75.6 77.4 79.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.3 63.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
126 139 141 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.1 79 82.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.7 61.3 62.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
246.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
249.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
219.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
249.7
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
299.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
299.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
229.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
146.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
268.7
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
119.4
low 1280x768
100.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
120.8 141 144 152 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115.1 129 130 140 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.8 119 120 131 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.8 114 116 123 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.5 83.2 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
232.2 235.1 284.8 310.8 ~ 266 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
139.9 168.2 182.1 209.6 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.9 100.6 109 119 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.2 56.1 58.4 62.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24.9 45.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
173  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
164  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
157
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
163
low 1280x720
278.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
252.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
229.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
126.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
130.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics257.9120.476.456.918.9
Doom Eternal176.1108.795.793.3
Hunt Showdown194.296.375.7
Escape from Tarkov78.568.568.285.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order92.98877.8
Need for Speed Heat103.288.782.279
GRID 2019157.4109.4103.473.533.1
Ghost Recon Breakpoint123827555
Borderlands 311789.561.948.3
Control183.767.150.4
F1 2019196137116101
Total War: Three Kingdoms201.1103.369.250.7
Anno 180081.581.661.436.5
The Division 2154927456
Dirt Rally 2.0276.7125.3105.360.524.4
Far Cry New Dawn105757063
Metro Exodus129.672.755.243.8
Apex Legends143.6142.8126.2116.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey97796545
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11887807020
Strange Brigade27613010693.1
Monster Hunter World104.594.275.663.6
X-Plane 11.11103907662
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark135796043.624.9
Fortnite124110.2107.481.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of War1551239776
Rocket League246.9249.7219.3
Overwatch299.9299.7229.7146.9
Doom125125118.2111.5
Ashes of the Singularity100.472.866.8
Metal Gear Solid V60606059.2
Dota 2 Reborn13912911911479
The Witcher 32661751045735
GTA V17316411968.2
BioShock Infinite278.3252.3229.5126.2
Guild Wars 2130.367.367.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


11
24


22
13

2
30
4

10
18
2

1

4
2
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 09:48:07

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.038s ... 0.039s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.043s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#23 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 9631 +0.035s ... 0.078s

#25 got single benchmarks 9631 +0.039s ... 0.117s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.714s ... 0.831s

#28 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.831s

#29 Got 191 rows for game benchmarks. +0.04s ... 0.871s

#30 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.871s

#31 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.025s ... 0.896s

#32 benchmarks composed for output. +1.426s ... 2.322s

#33 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.327s

#34 return log +0s ... 2.327s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q graphics card

2020惠普Envy 15 Creator Core i7笔记本电脑评测:惠普对MacBook的回应

2020惠普Envy 15 Creator Core i7笔记本电脑评测:惠普对MacBook的回应

惠普将赌注押在4K AMOLED,更快的GeForce RTX图形以及更便宜的起始价格上,以挑战MacBook Pro系列并吸引更多的内容创作者。
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-PH96: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-PH96

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0043ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0043ns

HP Envy 15-ep0041ur: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0041ur

HP Envy 15-ep0175nd: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0175nd

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN042: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN042

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0042ns: Intel Core i5-10300H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0042ns

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0033ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10"
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0033ns

HP Envy 15-ep008n: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep008n

HP Envy 15-ep0016tx: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0016tx

HP Envy 15-ep0015nl: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0015nl

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-A0029NS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-A0029NS

HP Envy 15-ep0190nd: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0190nd

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IVC-HA275T (ACRNM RMT01): AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IVC-HA275T (ACRNM RMT01)

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1064tx: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1064tx

Dell XPS 17 9700-C9T5T: Intel Core i9-10885H, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9700-C9T5T

HP Envy 15-ep0098nr: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0098nr

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1003ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1003ns

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN020: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN020

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE003T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE003T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE253T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE253T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HA116T: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HA116T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE022: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE022

Razer Blade 15 Base Model 2020, i7-10750H, RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Base Model 2020, i7-10750H, RTX 2060 Max-Q

Asus ProArt StudioBook 17 H700GV RTX 2060, Xeon E-2276M: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook 17 H700GV RTX 2060, Xeon E-2276M

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00CKSP: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00CKSP

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-04-26)