Notebookcheck

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

英特尔Iris Plus图形655（GT3e）是2017年9月发布的处理器集成显卡。作为英特尔Iris Graphics 650（Kaby Lake）的继承者，Iris Plus Graphics 655用于28瓦Coffee Lake-U型号。最大的区别是128 MB的双倍eDRAM缓存。与Iris Graphics 650相比，不应有任何明显变化。

所谓的Kaby Lake GPU的GT3e版本仍然有48个执行单元（EU），根据型号的不同，它可以达到1200 MHz（之前是1100 MHz）。除了eDRAM缓存之外，Iris 655还可以通过处理器接口访问系统内存（2x 64位DDR3L-2133 / DDR4-2400）。

与15瓦型号的Iris Plus 640相比，Iris 655仅具有略高的最大时钟频率以及几乎两倍的TDP，从而可以更好地利用Turbo Boost的潜力。

性能

Iris Plus Graphics 655的确切性能取决于CPU型号，因为最大时钟以及L3缓存的大小可能略有不同。系统内存（DDR3 / DDR4）也会影响性能。

最快的芯片是Core i7-8559U等高频率Core i7型号。根据游戏的不同，Iris Plus 655可能与专用的GeForce 930M或GeForce 940MX相媲美，可以在低至中等设置的现代游戏中流传的运行游戏。

功能

重新设计的视频引擎现在完全支持H.265 / HEVC视频的硬件解码。然而，与Skylake相反，Kaby Lake现在还可以解码具有10位色深的H.265 / HEVC Main 10以及Google的VP9编解码器。可通过DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3（最高3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz）输出视频，而旧的1.4a标准也支持HDMI。可以通过DisplayPort转换器添加HDMI 2.0输出。GPU可以同时驱动多达三个显示器。

能耗

Iris Plus Graphics 655用于28瓦处理器，因此适用于中小型笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerIntel
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 300? - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby Lake GT3e
ArchitectureIntel Gen. 9.5 (Kaby Lake)
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2017
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8559U4 x 2700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Core i5-8269U4 x 2600 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-8279U4 x 2400 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.300 - 300 MHz1050 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 705     avg: 711.3     median: 707 (5%)     max: 722 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 619     avg: 625.3     median: 624 (4%)     max: 633 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 134073     avg: 143400     median: 143400 (27%)     max: 152727 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
71073 Points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 11412     avg: 12085     median: 11806 (18%)     max: 13037 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 14343     avg: 15375     median: 15084 (8%)     max: 16698 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 1898     avg: 1947     median: 1903 (7%)     max: 2040 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 2004     avg: 2111.3     median: 2070 (5%)     max: 2260 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 108565     avg: 110302     median: 110302 (15%)     max: 112040 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 3330     avg: 3339.5     median: 3339 (10%)     max: 3349 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 3044     avg: 3062.5     median: 3062 (6%)     max: 3081 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
...
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX -8%
AMD Radeon HD 6970M -8%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 6790 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M -4%
AMD FirePro M5100 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 845M -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P500 -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
AMD Radeon HD 7770 1%
AMD Radeon HD 7770 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 1%
AMD FirePro W5130M 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M 2%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 5%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 5%
AMD Radeon HD 6990M 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M 6%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 1440%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
199.6 fps (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
30.6 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
480 Samples/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
1194 Samples/s (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
1841 Points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
47.2 Watt (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
47.2 Watt (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
998 MHz (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
36.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.9 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

Ghost Recon Breakpoint

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
25.4 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
51.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
56.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
30.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division 2

The Division 2

2019
low 1280x720
35  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt Rally 2.0

Dirt Rally 2.0

2019
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
16.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
22 fps  fps    + Compare