Notebookcheck

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

英特尔Iris Plus图形655(GT3e)是2017年9月发布的处理器集成显卡。作为英特尔Iris Graphics 650(Kaby Lake)的继承者,Iris Plus Graphics 655用于28瓦Coffee Lake-U型号。最大的区别是128 MB的双倍eDRAM缓存。与Iris Graphics 650相比,不应有任何明显变化。

所谓的Kaby Lake GPU的GT3e版本仍然有48个执行单元(EU),根据型号的不同,它可以达到1200 MHz(之前是1100 MHz)。除了eDRAM缓存之外,Iris 655还可以通过处理器接口访问系统内存(2x 64位DDR3L-2133 / DDR4-2400)。

与15瓦型号的Iris Plus 640相比,Iris 655仅具有略高的最大时钟频率以及几乎两倍的TDP,从而可以更好地利用Turbo Boost的潜力。

性能

Iris Plus Graphics 655的确切性能取决于CPU型号,因为最大时钟以及L3缓存的大小可能略有不同。系统内存(DDR3 / DDR4)也会影响性能。

最快的芯片是Core i7-8559U等高频率Core i7型号。根据游戏的不同,Iris Plus 655可能与专用的GeForce 930M或GeForce 940MX相媲美,可以在低至中等设置的现代游戏中流传的运行游戏。

功能

重新设计的视频引擎现在完全支持H.265 / HEVC视频的硬件解码。然而,与Skylake相反,Kaby Lake现在还可以解码具有10位色深的H.265 / HEVC Main 10以及Google的VP9编解码器。可通过DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3(最高3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz)输出视频,而旧的1.4a标准也支持HDMI。可以通过DisplayPort转换器添加HDMI 2.0输出。GPU可以同时驱动多达三个显示器。

能耗

Iris Plus Graphics 655用于28瓦处理器,因此适用于中小型笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerIntel
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby Lake GT3e
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2017
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 655GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8559U4 x 2700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Core i5-8269U4 x 2600 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-8279U4 x 2400 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10.5 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -88%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -6%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 348     avg: 632     median: 676 (4%)     max: 722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 301     avg: 556     median: 601 (3%)     max: 633 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -80%
...
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 -20%
AMD Radeon R7 M445 -15%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 0%
Intel Iris Graphics 550 0%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 13%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 15%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 15%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 21%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 25%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 30%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 134073     avg: 143400     median: 143400 (21%)     max: 152727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
71073 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6769     avg: 10880     median: 11517 (15%)     max: 13037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6498     avg: 13601     median: 14713.5 (7%)     max: 16698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 852     avg: 1672     median: 1838.5 (5%)     max: 2040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 920     avg: 1806     median: 1959 (4%)     max: 2260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 108565     avg: 110303     median: 110302 (15%)     max: 112040 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1548     avg: 2849     median: 3181 (7%)     max: 3349 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1365     avg: 2614     median: 2947 (5%)     max: 3081 Points
...
Intel Iris Graphics 550 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 7850M -6%
AMD Radeon R7 M340 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M -2%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX 3%
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 3%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 6%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800M 1495%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12093 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10337 Points (9%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200 -99%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI -4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 -2%
AMD Radeon 540X 0%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI 2%
AMD FirePro M5100 2%
AMD Radeon HD 7850M 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
17176 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 7836     avg: 9185     median: 9184.5 (43%)     max: 10533 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 51.62     avg: 51.9     median: 51.9 (19%)     max: 52.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 33.91     avg: 65.4     median: 71.2 (19%)     max: 88 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.3     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 59.7     avg: 1709     median: 1708.5 (51%)     max: 3357.300048828125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 199.6     avg: 6375     median: 6375.2 (51%)     max: 12550.8 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
30.6 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
200 fps (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
480 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1194 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1841 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (5%)     max: 36 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.3     avg: 41.3     median: 41.3 (6%)     max: 47.2 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 39.4     avg: 43.3     median: 43.3 (10%)     max: 47.2 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.1 Points per Watt (2%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
998 MHz (50%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
29.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
36.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.9 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
13
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
25.4 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
51.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
30.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
16.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
13 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare