华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑
华为推出了新版 MateBook D 16,配备了强大的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H(猛禽湖)处理器。它采用金属外壳,配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。雾面 IPS 显示屏具有完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,但只有全高清分辨率,也没有更高的刷新率等特殊功能。如果你仔细看看参数表,你还会发现一个 720p 网络摄像头,甚至是一个老式的 USB 2.0 端口。华为新款 MateBook D 16 2024 的要价为 1199 英镑,我们研究了一下这个价格是否合理。
此外,还有一款更便宜的机型,配备酷睿 i5-13420H、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘,售价 699 英镑。不过,该机的显示效果较差(只有 45% NTSC 而不是 100% sRGB),电池容量也较小(56 Wh 而不是 70 Wh)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85 % | 01/2024 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % | 12/2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % | 10/2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
88.6 % | 08/2023 | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % | 06/2023 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
85.8 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.6 % | 05/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86 % | 06/2023 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1680 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - MateBook D 16 采用金属外壳
乍一看,深灰色的表壳与前代产品并无不同 前代但这是一个全新的外壳,内部设计也有所改变。得益于纤薄的边框,设计显得更加时尚,表面也不会特别容易吸附灰尘和指纹。新功能之一是显示屏铰链,现在的最大开启角度为 180 度。铰链的位置非常紧,单手无法打开盖子。不过,在调整打开角度时,会出现明显的晃动。
质量方面,这款手机壳给人的印象还不错。华为没有使用金属,虽然塑料结构主要是牢固的,但按压中央区域时,底座和盖子很容易松动。这在日常使用中并不会造成任何问题。扭动底座时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音,相当不雅观。
相比之下,MateBook 并不占空间,重量略高于 1.7 千克,可以说是一般。65 瓦的 PSU 重 204 克,非常轻巧。
功能 - 华为采用了 USB 2.0 而非 Thunderbolt 技术
当涉及到端口时,你只能得到最低限度的端口,这种情况是一个明显的倒退,即使与旧的 MateBook D 16 2022.华为完全没有使用 Thunderbolt 或 USB 4。取而代之的是,只有一个 USB-C 端口(3.2 Gen.1),同时也用于电源。在右侧,唯一的 USB-A 接口仅使用 2.0 标准。在这个价位的产品中,这是绝对不允许的。HDMI 输出也只支持 1.4 标准,这意味着外接 4K 显示器无法以 60 赫兹运行,只能以 30 赫兹运行。即使是旧款 2022 型号也集成了 HDMI 2.0 输出和一个额外的 USB 端口。如果您使用其他华为设备(如智能手机、平板电脑),这部分的唯一好处就是跨设备操作。
交流
华为采用了我们熟悉的英特尔 AX201 Wi-Fi 模块,它支持 Wi-Fi 6 网络,但还不支持当前的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准。不过,与华硕参考路由器连接后,其性能非常出色,而且在测试过程中,我们无法检测到任何形式的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。
Networking | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
顶部边框上的网络摄像头只能提供 720p 的分辨率,因此绝对不能再被视为最新的摄像头。因此,图像缺乏细节,也不是特别清晰。
维护
底盖由 10 颗 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以拆卸。在内部,你很快就会注意到新的冷却系统,它在底座的右侧装有两个风扇。此外,你还可以看到有许多未使用的空间,这些空间本可以轻松用于内存插槽或第二个 M.2 2280 插槽。但现在,你只能使用一个固态硬盘、16 GB 焊接内存和一个焊接 Wi-Fi 模块。
输入设备 - 背光键盘和数字键盘
MateBook D 16 2024 的键盘配备了专用数字键盘,其按键略显狭窄。总的来说,键盘给人留下了良好的印象。得益于 1.5 毫米的键程和精确的输入,打字体验非常舒适,即使是较长的文本也能直接输入。不过,该键盘也是声音较大的机型之一。华为集成了两级白色背光,可惜不能通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮位于键盘上方的右侧,它还包含指纹传感器。
点击板的尺寸为 12 x 7.3 厘米,大小适中,运行正常。像往常一样,可以用物理方式按压键盘底部,但会发出响亮而廉价的 "咔嗒 "声。在实际使用中,我们只建议点击键盘进行输入。
显示屏 - 16:10 IPS 面板
我们已经知道京东方(NV160WUM-NH0)的 16 英寸 IPS 雾面面板来自旧的 2022 型号.这是一款非常简单的显示屏,分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。主观画质不错,即使是明亮区域也不会出现颗粒感。不过,在 60 Hz 和没有 HDR 等附加功能的情况下,这个价位段的竞争非常激烈。从对比设备中可以看出,这些设备都采用了更好的显示屏(更高分辨率、偶尔采用 OLED、更高频率)。只有 联想 Yoga 7采用了类似的面板。
华为指定的亮度为 300 cd/m²,但我们的评测设备的平均亮度为 340 cd/m²,远远超过了这一标准。尽管如此,在 80% 的亮度下,照明效果并不理想。我们测得的黑度为 0.24 cd/m²,最大对比度几乎达到 1.500:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1454:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 33% | 4% | 33% | -36% | 31% | -4% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 96.7 45% | 99.9 50% | 70 5% | 99.91 50% | 42 -37% | 99.7 49% | 63 -6% | 66.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.5 | 99.8 3% | 100 4% | 99.3 3% | 100 4% | 62.8 -35% | 100 4% | 94.9 -2% | 96.4 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 84.6 23% | 100 45% | 71.2 3% | 98.87 44% | 43.5 -37% | 97 41% | 65.1 -5% | 68.3 -1% |
Response Times | -63% | 97% | 63% | 92% | -3% | 92% | 3% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31 ? | 49.4 ? -59% | 0.57 ? 98% | 11 ? 65% | 2 ? 94% | 31.8 ? -3% | 2 ? 94% | 34 ? -10% | 30.5 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.3 ? | 33.9 ? -67% | 1 ? 95% | 8 ? 61% | 2 ? 90% | 20.9 ? -3% | 2 ? 90% | 17 ? 16% | 18.7 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 238.8 | 227 ? | 26 ? | ||||||
Screen | -5% | 11% | 13% | -25% | -48% | 193% | 16% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 349 | 473.6 36% | 379.8 9% | 356 2% | 370 6% | 279.4 -20% | 412 18% | 448 28% | 319 -9% |
Brightness | 340 | 456 34% | 383 13% | 349 3% | 371 9% | 257 -24% | 412 21% | 436 28% | 317 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 87 9% | 98 23% | 93 16% | 98 23% | 81 1% | 98 23% | 93 16% | 90 13% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.19 21% | 0.28 -17% | 0.18 25% | 0.015 94% | 0.35 -46% | 0.23 4% | ||
Contrast | 1454 | 2493 71% | 1271 -13% | 1552 7% | 27467 1789% | 1280 -12% | 1387 -5% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.9 -111% | 4.7 -68% | 1.7 39% | 2.77 1% | 5.12 -83% | 2.34 16% | 1.6 43% | 3.4 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 9.37 -28% | 7.51 -3% | 3 59% | 4.08 44% | 19.42 -166% | 3.34 54% | 4.44 39% | 8.1 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.89 -27% | 0.55 21% | 1 -43% | 2.83 -304% | 1.84 -163% | 2.95 -321% | 0.64 9% | 0.8 -14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.3 -49% | 0.8 84% | 1.3 73% | 2.58 47% | 5.5 -12% | 2.78 43% | 2.78 43% | 5.7 -16% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.5 88% | 2.1 105% | |
CCT | 7328 89% | 7260 90% | 6381 102% | 6625 98% | 6241 104% | 6407 101% | 6879 94% | 6582 99% | 7433 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 2.43 | ||||||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-7% | 47% /
31% | 27% /
18% | 33% /
9% | -29% /
-39% | 105% /
144% | 5% /
10% | -1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)进行的分析表明,出厂时的校准效果并不是特别好,开箱后,灰度和色彩方面都存在明显偏差。此外,你还可以发现明显的蓝色色调,再加上过冷的色温,最大亮度也无法从中受益。经过我们的校准(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),面板显示出了其隐藏的潜力,因为与 sRGB 参考色彩空间(几乎完全覆盖)有关的灰度和色彩偏差极低,所有值都明显低于重要的 DeltaE 2000 偏差 3。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
得益于雾面 IPS 面板,MateBook 甚至可以在室外使用,即使在非常明亮的日子里,也应避免光源反射。总的来说,可视角度稳定性不错。
性能 - 经济模式下的酷睿 i9
测试条件
在华为的 PC Manager 中,有两种能耗设置--首先是预设的平衡模式,其次是性能模式。后者并没有提供更多的性能,在连续负载时仅增加 5 瓦(40 瓦而不是 35 瓦 TDP)。这与风扇的噪音(46.2 对 36.2 dB(A))不成比例。这意味着您可以放心使用平衡 模式,也就是我们在即将进行的基准测试和测量中使用的模式。
处理器 - 酷睿 i9-13900H
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是猛禽湖系列中速度极快的移动处理器,拥有 6 个快速性能内核和 8 个效率内核。它总共可以同时处理多达 20 个线程。其性能潜力非常大,不过,MateBook D 16 中的酷睿 i9 受限于 64/45 瓦(之后为 35 瓦)的低功耗限制。唯一令人印象深刻的是单核性能,虽然这在日常使用中起着重要作用,但归根结底,选择酷睿 i9 其实只是为了在数据表上好看。更便宜的 酷睿 i7-13700H的整体性能几乎相同。此外,多核性能在使用很短时间后就会明显下降。 MateBook 16s在多核负载方面要快 20% 以上。在电池模式下,CPU 性能几乎保持不变。 其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU | v3.3 Classroom CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (13177 - 20385, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=23) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4960 - 7716, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=23) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=23) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=21) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (279 - 428, n=21) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=22) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.7 - 22.3, n=22) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=22) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=22) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=22) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=22) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=22) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
系统性能
从主观上看,MateBook 的性能水平非常高,每次输入都能迅速执行。合成基准测试结果没有显示任何异常,我们在测试过程中也未能发现任何异常。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6190 - 6472, n=5) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11156 - 11774, n=5) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7505 - 7979, n=5) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7573 - 8073, n=5) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1811 - 2146, n=4) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1722 - 2064, n=4) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2041 - 2224, n=4) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1474 - 2171, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (274 - 339, n=5) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (171.4 - 432, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (283 - 348, n=3) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=95, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (456 - 541, n=5) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6472 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=22) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=22) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=22) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (82.3 - 102.3, n=22) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载),使用提供的 BIOS 版本,评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有表现出任何限制。一个驱动程序确实有点故障,但重要的 "中断处理延迟 "值可以忽略不计。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
与 MateBook 16s安装的固态硬盘没有制造商标识。固态硬盘上只有型号(321JN1024GB-TX01)。我们使用的是 M.2 2280 固态硬盘,它通过 PCIe 4.0 连接,容量为 1 TB。该固态硬盘的传输速度超过 4 GB/s,性能非常令人满意,即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。不过,开箱即用的固态硬盘分区再次出现问题。在系统 C 盘中,用户只能使用 135 GB,另外的 733 GB 都在 D 盘中。这完全没有必要,而且很快就会成为问题,因为通常情况下,所有应用程序和下载都在 C 盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
处理器的集成 Iris Xe Graphics G7负责图形计算。它的速度很快,拥有 96 个 EU,最高速度可达 1.5 GHz。这样的性能已经足够,只要不使用 GPU 密集型应用程序,就可以播放高分辨率视频。不过 AMD Radeon 780M和新的 Arc iGPU要快得多。
Matebook D 16 用户不应该有高远的游戏目标,而且由于没有 Thunderbolt 和 USB 4.0 接口,也不可能使用外置显卡。即使是在玩较老和要求不高的游戏时,一般也只能使用低细节设置。至少在长时间负载和电池模式下,性能仍然稳定。其他 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 8141 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5618 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2028 points | |
Help |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 130.4 | 112.3 | 25.6 | 10.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 110 | 71 | 38 | 15.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 121.3 | 91.1 | 74 | 65 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 49.9 | 27 | 19.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 60.9 | 44.8 | 39.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 61 | 34 | 31 | 29 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 102.7 | 44.8 | 35.4 | 28.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 114.8 | 59.1 | 46 | 31.7 |
F1 22 (2022) | 53.4 | 47.6 | 33.6 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 48.8 | 44.2 | 30.7 |
排放 - 静音风扇
噪音排放
华为对散热系统进行了全面调整,现在使用两个并排安装在机箱右侧的风扇。这两个风扇非常安静,在日常工作中通常会被关闭(或只听到极其安静的嗡嗡声)。即使在玩游戏时,噪音水平也仅为 32 dB(A),在 CPU 满负荷运行几分钟后也仅为 36.2 dB(A)。可选的性能模式会将噪音值提高到 46.2 dB(A),因此应避免使用。我们的评测设备没有任何其他类型的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28 / 36.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -22% | -16% | -18% | -23% | -15% | -24% | -25% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.5 -6% | 23.4 -1% | 25.5 -10% | 25.7 -11% | 22.8 2% | 25.2 -9% | 25.7 -11% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 24.5 -6% | 24.1 -4% | 25.5 -10% | 26.1 -13% | 22.9 1% | 25.2 -9% | 25.7 -11% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 26.3 -13% | 24.3 -5% | 28.7 -24% | 26.1 -13% | 22.9 1% | 25.2 -9% | 28.4 -22% | 25.8 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 26.3 -10% | 28 -17% | 29.1 -21% | 27.2 -13% | 26.9 -12% | 29.3 -22% | 28.4 -18% | 30.5 -27% |
Load Average * | 28 | 36.5 -30% | 41 -46% | 33.8 -21% | 44.2 -58% | 41.7 -49% | 46.4 -66% | 45.3 -62% | 39.8 -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31.9 | 46.3 -45% | 40.9 -28% | 37.6 -18% | 41.5 -30% | 39.8 -25% | |||
Load Maximum * | 36.2 | 52.9 -46% | 40.9 -13% | 44.9 -24% | 47.5 -31% | 43.6 -20% | 46.4 -28% | 45.6 -26% | 39.8 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于风扇布局不对称,在负载情况下左侧的温度尤其高。总之,无论在低负载还是高负载下,温度都不会造成太大问题。在压力测试中,只要使用平衡 模式,处理器的功耗很快就降到了 35 瓦。在可选的性能模式下,几分钟后,功耗稳定在 40 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -9% | -0% | -14% | -2% | -11% | -10% | -7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.3 | 48.8 -21% | 41.6 -3% | 41.1 -2% | 44.4 -10% | 37.6 7% | 41.6 -3% | 43.2 -7% | 41.8 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 47.6 -6% | 46.6 -3% | 42 7% | 48 -6% | 40 11% | 45 -0% | 44.7 1% | 47.3 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 24.2 9% | 30.4 -14% | 28.5 -7% | 31.9 -20% | 30.4 -14% | 31 -17% | 32.1 -21% | 28.3 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 23.6 13% | 31 -14% | 26.8 1% | 31.9 -18% | 30.6 -13% | 33.6 -24% | 30.1 -11% | 30.2 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器的表现都很一般,缺乏力量和空间深度。它的优点是能清晰地再现高音,这在语音播放(如电话会议时)时具有积极意义。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--供电不足的 PSU 和较长的电池寿命
耗电量
空闲运行时,最大功耗为 10 瓦,屏幕亮度达到最大。然而,在负载情况下,65 瓦的 PSU 限制了功耗。考虑到处理器至少能在短时间内消耗 64 瓦的功率,65 瓦的 PSU 在这种情况下无法为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。在这种情况下,电池必须在短时间内使用,这对电池的预期寿命肯定不利。电池的最大耗电量超过 20 瓦。在连续负载的情况下,平衡 模式下的功率会趋于平稳,而 PSU 的功率也足够了。但是,如果长时间使用高性能模式(CPU 稳定在 40 瓦),电池容量就会持续下降(每小时 2-3%)。有趣的是,这个问题无法解决,因为即使使用功率更大的 100 瓦 PSU,MateBook 也不会消耗额外的电量。
Off / Standby | 0.26 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 4.7 / 9.5 / 10.1 Watt |
Load |
49.7 / 66.3 Watt |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -13% | -13% | -25% | -2% | 6% | 19% | -28% | -16% | 0% | -53% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3 36% | 7.1 -51% | 6.3 -34% | 5.8 -23% | 3.3 30% | 3.9 17% | 5.8 -23% | 6.1 -30% | 5.26 ? -12% | 7.29 ? -55% |
Idle Average * | 9.5 | 9.5 -0% | 10.1 -6% | 14.4 -52% | 6 37% | 10.2 -7% | 4.8 49% | 7.7 19% | 10.6 -12% | 8.46 ? 11% | 11.8 ? -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 12 -19% | 18.6 -84% | 16.2 -60% | 6.9 32% | 10.3 -2% | 10 1% | 10.6 -5% | 11.5 -14% | 10.7 ? -6% | 14.6 ? -45% |
Load Average * | 49.7 | 68.3 -37% | 45.3 9% | 46.2 7% | 59 -19% | 55.2 -11% | 44 11% | 76.9 -55% | 65.5 -32% | 44.8 ? 10% | 77.7 ? -56% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 59.8 -0% | 39.5 34% | 49.4 18% | 61.1 -2% | 43.8 27% | 42.3 29% | 76.7 -28% | 61.2 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 66.3 | 104.8 -58% | 52.9 20% | 85.2 -29% | 92 -39% | 65.7 1% | 63 5% | 118 -78% | 68.4 -3% | 66.8 ? -1% | 121 ? -83% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
酷睿 i9 机型的电池容量增至 70 Wh(i5 版本为 56 Wh),因此电池续航时间非常长。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,在 150 cd/m²(我们的评测设备亮度为 54%)的条件下,运行时间达到了 11 小时 14 分钟,在全亮度条件下甚至达到了 8 小时 21 分钟。我们的视频测试在 150 cd/m² 的亮度下甚至可以运行近 14 个小时。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要两个多小时,而且不支持快速充电。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 99.9 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 82% | -50% | 29% | 8% | 17% | 12% | 44% | -37% | -4% | |
H.264 | 835 | 861 3% | 710 ? -15% | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 674 | 1100 63% | 336 -50% | 479 -29% | 467.7 -31% | 566 -16% | 613 -9% | 787 17% | 424 -37% | 572 ? -15% |
Load | 83 | 166 100% | 155 87% | 121 46% | 124 49% | 119 43% | 142 71% | 97.7 ? 18% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1506 | 1138 | 1821 | 933 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:MateBook D 16 技术落后,价格昂贵
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 让我们大吃一惊,因为它的整体包装相当不平衡。这款 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑具有一些积极的方面,例如其强大的处理器。不过,虽然酷睿 i9 处理器的纸面性能不错,但酷睿 i7 处理器也能提供同样的性能。与前代产品一样,尽管功耗限制很低,但它足以胜任日常任务,一般来说,两个风扇都没什么可做的。
雾面 IPS 显示屏有许多令人印象深刻的功能。它的主观图像质量很好,在色彩还原方面达到了参考水平。此外,全 sRGB 色彩覆盖意味着在图像编辑时没有任何障碍。此外,PWM 功能不存在,电池续航时间长和键盘舒适也是其积极的一面。
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 是一款非常不平衡的多媒体笔记本电脑,快速的处理器、出色的 IPS 显示屏和较长的电池续航时间被完全过时的功能集所抵消。售价为 1,199 英镑的新款 Matebook 在 USB 2.0 等功能方面简直令人难以接受,总而言之,它太贵了。
另一方面,MateBook D 16 2024 也存在一些严重的缺陷。尤其是在端口选择上,不得不受到批评。与前代产品相比,华为继续进一步减少端口数量,只为笔记本配备了一个用于供电的 USB-C 端口。制造商没有使用 Thunderbolt 4 或 USB 4.0,但相比之下,在右侧可以找到一个老化的 USB 2.0 端口。此外,网络摄像头只有 720p,而且不支持现代 Wi-Fi 6E 网络。
此外,还有其他一些问题。供电电源功率不足,如果处理器(即使只是短时间使用)的最大功耗为 64 瓦,那么 65 瓦的电源适配器无法提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。此外,机箱内浪费了太多空间,本可以集成两个 SODIMM 插槽。我们无法对售价 999 美元的较小机型进行评估,因为它配备了性能较差的处理器(iGPU 性能更弱)和较差的显示屏(45% NTSC),电池容量也较小。在最坏的情况下,我们上面描述的积极因素都不复存在。
总体而言,由于其积极的方面,价格更高的 MateBook D 16 2024 版获得了 85% 的良好评价,但性价比却不尽如人意。因此,我们不能推荐购买。
价格和供应情况
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 将于 2024 年 2 月 1 日开始发售,但在英国已经可以从华为预订。凡在 1 月 12 日至 2 月 29 日期间订购该设备者,均可免费获得华为 FreeBuds 5。此外,在 1 月 31 日之前还有 50 英镑的预购折扣。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
-
01/12/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.