Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 530

Radeon 530,是2017年发布的、用于笔记本电脑的专用入门级显卡。根据AMD的说法,目前存在几种不同的版本,包括384/320着色单元和DDR3/GDDR5 64位显存。然而,它们不属于新的RX系列Polaris芯片之一,最有可能是采用与Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M(384着色器单元,28 纳米 GCN)和M430 / M330 / M230(320个着色单元,28纳米 Sun GCN)相同的构架。AMD声称,Radeon 530的时钟频率可以达到1,024 MHz。

考虑到上面的情况,Radeon 530的游戏性能应该在Radeon R7 M440(320着色单元,DDR3),Radeon R7 M460(384着色单元,DDR3)和Radeon R7 M445(320着色单元,GDDR5)之间。(详情请查阅对应的游戏基准页面)。图形密集型游戏如《羞辱2》,《使命召唤:无限战争》或者《幽浮2》应该不能在这款显卡上顺利运行。而《守望先锋》,《Fifa 17》(配合一个高速的处理器)或《模拟农场17》等对显卡要求不高的游戏,则运行良好。但需要使用低到中等的细节设置。相关的详细的游戏基准,请访问前面带链接卡片的页面。基于不同规格,DDR3版本可能会比Radeon 520更慢,这是又320着色单元和GDDR5决定的。

Radeon 500 Series

Radeon 530 384 @ 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
Radeon 520 320 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1024 MHz
Memory Speed2250 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.7 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -91%
...
0.632 -10%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
0.636 -9%
0.647 -8%
0.66 -6%
Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.66 -6%
0.665 -5%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
0.671 -4%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
0.693 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
0.697 -1%
AMD Radeon 530
0.702
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
0.717 2%
0.717 2%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
0.719 2%
0.726 3%
0.727 4%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
0.732 4%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.738 5%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
0.739 5%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
0.75 7%
...
21.1 2906%
max:
33.3 4644%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 486     avg: 514     median: 497 (1%)     max: 559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 424     avg: 452.3     median: 443 (1%)     max: 490 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -75%
...
381 -16%
389.1 -14%
397 -12%
409.5 -9%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
410 -9%
417 -8%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
419.6 -7%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
442.5 -2%
450.5 0%
AMD Radeon 530
452.3
AMD Radeon 610M
458.3 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
471 4%
493 9%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
539 19%
550 22%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
552 22%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
555 23%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
558 23%
570 26%
...
19434 4197%
max:
36485 7967%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 69759     avg: 105231     median: 107458 (12%)     max: 136248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 43413     avg: 52303     median: 49386 (6%)     max: 67025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3749     avg: 6603     median: 6371 (7%)     max: 8707 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6266     avg: 8145     median: 9210 (2%)     max: 9466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1062     avg: 1419     median: 1386 (2%)     max: 1810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1224     avg: 1579     median: 1542 (2%)     max: 1990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 56520     avg: 67535     median: 62027.5 (7%)     max: 89565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2121     avg: 2496     median: 2508 (3%)     max: 2935 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2113     avg: 2355     median: 2327 (2%)     max: 2654 Points
171.8 -93%
...
2245 -5%
AMD Radeon 610M
2252 -4%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
2275 -3%
2300 -2%
AMD FirePro W4170M
2315 -2%
2327 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2328 -1%
2341 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2353 0%
AMD Radeon 530
2355
2371 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8850M
2381 1%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
2396 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
2398 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
2417 3%
2422 3%
2427 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
2434 3%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
2435 3%
...
59943 2445%
max:
106023 4402%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6283     avg: 6338     median: 6337.5 (2%)     max: 6392 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5074     avg: 5369     median: 5368.5 (3%)     max: 5663 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
5142 -4%
5150 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
5162 -4%
Intel HD Graphics 530
5173 -4%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
5209 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
5243 -2%
5243 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
5324 -1%
5366 0%
AMD Radeon 530
5369
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
5372 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
5382 0%
5410 1%
5411 1%
5452 2%
5560 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
5573 4%
5594 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
5595 4%
...
132443 2367%
max:
170928 3084%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
30891 Points (16%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 16614     avg: 17513     median: 17513 (19%)     max: 18412 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
16882 -4%
16936 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
16942 -3%
16944 -3%
16972 -3%
17043 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
17105 -2%
17192 -2%
17271 -1%
AMD Radeon 530
17513
17545 0%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
17567 0%
17784 2%
18044 3%
18136 4%
18199 4%
18199 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
18414 5%
18466 5%
...
61850 253%
max:
87172 398%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 9517     avg: 11377     median: 11481 (15%)     max: 13132 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 5.7     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 16.9     avg: 17     median: 17 (6%)     max: 17.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 13.1     avg: 14.1     median: 14.1 (6%)     max: 15.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 20     median: 20 (4%)     max: 25.8 fps
0.6 -97%
...
17.9 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 -10%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 -8%
18.7 -6%
18.8 -6%
19.03 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
19.4 -3%
19.5 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 M340
19.8 -1%
AMD Radeon 530
19.95
20.3 2%
20.4 2%
20.93 5%
21.2 6%
21.2 6%
22 10%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 11%
23.1 16%
23.35 17%
...
532 2567%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5166     avg: 7436     median: 7731 (5%)     max: 9411 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 25.48     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (9%)     max: 27.64 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.06     avg: 41.6     median: 44.5 (3%)     max: 48.43 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98     median: 98 (98%)     max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
31.2 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25.4     avg: 27.5     median: 27.5 (3%)     max: 29.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 34.3     avg: 34.9     median: 34.9 (1%)     max: 35.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 37.6     avg: 45.2     median: 45.2 (3%)     max: 52.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 113.8     avg: 116.1     median: 116.1 (1%)     max: 118.3 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 189     avg: 205.5     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 222 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 353     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (1%)     max: 420 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 741     avg: 992     median: 895 (1%)     max: 1341 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.3 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 43     avg: 51.5     median: 53.6 (12%)     max: 58 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.1175     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (13%)     max: 0.1419 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (13%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 40.7     avg: 46     median: 48 (77%)     max: 49.2 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
894 MHz (35%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
899 MHz (36%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
45.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
16.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
35.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
99.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
24.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
14
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
17.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
32.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
42.7 45.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.5 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
18.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.3 13.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.4 6.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.8 36.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.9 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28.6 37.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.2 15.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
53.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
16.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
65.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
15
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
22 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
13
low 1280x720
18.6 18.6 26.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3 12.3 17.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2 12.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
62.4 80.9 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.1 41.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
32.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
22.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
95.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
75.3
low 1280x720
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
85  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
24.9
low 1280x720
18.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1366x768
12.8
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
18.2
low 1280x720
47.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.4 74.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.5 31.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
26.3
low 1280x720
19.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
35.8 58.1 69.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4 46.2 59.3 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.1 27.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
25.1
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
16.8 19.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
16.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.1 33.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.7 21.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
60.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
35.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
92.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
62.1 84.1 106 106.2 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.9 48.2 66.6 66.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7 27.7 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
13 29 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24 27.1 29.4 32.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
17.3 18.9 19.8 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1 11.1 14 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6 6.1 6.3 ~ 6 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
85.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
44.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
45.3
low 1024x768
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
48.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
46.8 52.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
29.1 32.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
124.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
175.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
61.7 73.8 97.5 108.9 118.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.7 43.7 50.5 59.6 60.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.7 33.8 42.9 49.4 49.7 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9 14.8 15.4 16.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
71.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
87.3 100.1 118.7 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.7 51.7 59 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.8 39.9 43.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 20.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
145.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
119.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
85.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
46.1 58.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31 42.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.9 31.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
247  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
75.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics45.616.910.8
Doom Eternal16.5
Hunt Showdown20.797.7
Escape from Tarkov31.516.311.6
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order12.710.2
Need for Speed Heat25.111.38.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201921.712.28.5
GRID 201935.612.87.1
Ghost Recon Breakpoint1687
FIFA 2099.652.149.137.8
Borderlands 324.69.66
Control247.14.9
F1 2019361715
Total War: Three Kingdoms33.19.55.5
Rage 217.65.6
Anno 180032.810.76.4
The Division 229117
Dirt Rally 2.0441511
Anthem18.611
Far Cry New Dawn219
Metro Exodus1274.9
Apex Legends321310.6
Just Cause 419.611.8
Darksiders III41.910.5
Battlefield V331412.8
Farming Simulator 1953.821.610.6
Fallout 7623.410.7
Hitman 216.58.2
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey271615
Forza Horizon 43120
FIFA 1965.834.632
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2497
F1 20182918
Monster Hunter World22.98.6
Far Cry 5241010
X-Plane 11.11211412
Kingdom Come: Deliverance25.810
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark15.57.2
Fortnite723012.6
Star Wars Battlefront 232.211.1
Need for Speed Payback24.212.1
Call of Duty WWII38.423.1
Destiny 222.611.6
FIFA 1895.351.639.6
Team Fortress 2908539
Rocket League7024.9
Prey35.314.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands18.810.3
For Honor30.311.1
Titanfall 247.233.713.2
Battlefield 128.519.1
Civilization VI602812.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided19.714.2
Mirror's Edge Catalyst30.318.3
Overwatch554526
Doom188.3
Ashes of the Singularity16.58.9
The Division29.717.3
Far Cry Primal2111
Rise of the Tomb Raider301810.68.5
Rainbow Six Siege60.937.421.3
Anno 220535.117.7
World of Warships92.961.224.6
Dota 2 Reborn90573028
Batman: Arkham Knight212411
The Witcher 32819126
GTA V85.679.216.27.1
Battlefield Hardline6345.116.3
Dragon Age: Inquisition48.231.19.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor503116
Sims 4124.646.422.8
GRID: Autosport175.462.2
BioShock Infinite92514215
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm71.543.435.221.9
Tomb Raider102533919
Counter-Strike: GO145.2119.864.935.5
Diablo III85.761.753.4
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim52372717.8
StarCraft 224775.846.624.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
34
24
16
4
55
16
7
38
10
1
9
2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 09:56:50

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.048s ... 0.049s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.049s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7940 +0.028s ... 0.077s

#8 got single benchmarks 7940 +0.038s ... 0.116s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.986s ... 1.102s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.102s

#12 Got 295 rows for game benchmarks. +0.024s ... 1.126s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.126s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.067s ... 1.194s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +2.532s ... 3.725s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 3.731s

#17 return log +0s ... 3.731s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 530 graphics card

惠普 Pavilion 17z-ak000 (A9-9420, Radeon 530) 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 Pavilion 17z-ak000 (A9-9420, Radeon 530) 笔记本电脑简短评测

龟速。 在速度方面Stoney Ridge落后于主流不少。这台AMD平台设备可以帮助用户节省一些预算,不过它缓慢的响应也是用户需要付出的巨大代价。...
AMD A9-9420 | AMD Radeon 530 | 17.30" | 2.6 kg

HP 15-bw082nd: AMD A10-9620P, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bw082nd

HP 470 G7, i5-10210U, Radeon 530: Intel Core i5-10210U, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 470 G7, i5-10210U, Radeon 530

Dell Inspiron 13 5370-MRFG2: Intel Core i7-8550U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 13 5370-MRFG2

HP 15-db0024ns: AMD A9-9425, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db0024ns

Dell Inspiron 15 3576-9HRPY: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3576-9HRPY

HP Pavilion x360 15-cr0004tx: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion x360 15-cr0004tx

Lenovo Ideapad 330-15IKB-81DE014NIN: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 330-15IKB-81DE014NIN

Dell Vostro 14 5471-5MPNF: Intel Core i7-8550U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 5471-5MPNF

Dell Inspiron 15 5570-37HG8: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5570-37HG8

Dell Vostro 14 5471-48619955SLV: Intel Core i5-8250U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 5471-48619955SLV

HP 17-by0016ng: Intel Core i5-8250U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-by0016ng

HP 15-bs116ns: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bs116ns

Lenovo V330-15IKB-81AX00AQCK: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V330-15IKB-81AX00AQCK

Dell Inspiron 15 5570-0302: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5570-0302

Dell Inspiron 17 5770-0364: Intel Core i7-8550U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17 5770-0364

HP 17-BS100NS: Intel Core i5-8250U, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP 17-BS100NS

Dell Inspiron 15 5570-5441: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5570-5441

HP 17-bs191nd: Intel Core i5-8250U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-bs191nd

HP 15-bs044ns: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bs044ns

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter