Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon 530

Radeon 530,是2017年发布的、用于笔记本电脑的专用入门级显卡。根据AMD的说法,目前存在几种不同的版本,包括384/320着色单元和DDR3/GDDR5 64位显存。然而,它们不属于新的RX系列Polaris芯片之一,最有可能是采用与Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M(384着色器单元,28 纳米 GCN)和M430 / M330 / M230(320个着色单元,28纳米 Sun GCN)相同的构架。AMD声称,Radeon 530的时钟频率可以达到1,024 MHz。

考虑到上面的情况,Radeon 530的游戏性能应该在Radeon R7 M440(320着色单元,DDR3),Radeon R7 M460(384着色单元,DDR3)和Radeon R7 M445(320着色单元,GDDR5)之间。(详情请查阅对应的游戏基准页面)。图形密集型游戏如《羞辱2》,《使命召唤:无限战争》或者《幽浮2》应该不能在这款显卡上顺利运行。而《守望先锋》,《Fifa 17》(配合一个高速的处理器)或《模拟农场17》等对显卡要求不高的游戏,则运行良好。但需要使用低到中等的细节设置。相关的详细的游戏基准,请访问前面带链接卡片的页面。基于不同规格,DDR3版本可能会比Radeon 520更慢,这是又320着色单元和GDDR5决定的。

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon 500 Series
Radeon 530 384 @ 1024 MHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
Radeon 520 320 @ 1030 MHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1024 MHz
Memory Speed2250 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3/GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/...

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 486     avg: 491.5     median: 491 (4%)     max: 497 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 424     avg: 433.5     median: 433 (3%)     max: 443 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 69759     avg: 94892     median: 106622 (20%)     max: 108295 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 43413     avg: 47395     median: 46594 (6%)     max: 52178 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 3749     avg: 6245.3     median: 6262 (10%)     max: 8707 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 6266     avg: 7829.8     median: 7793 (4%)     max: 9466 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 1062     avg: 1371.5     median: 1307 (5%)     max: 1810 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1224     avg: 1530.3     median: 1453 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 56520     avg: 60191.7     median: 58406 (8%)     max: 65649 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 2121     avg: 2469.5     median: 2411 (7%)     max: 2935 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 2113     avg: 2353.5     median: 2323 (5%)     max: 2654 points
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti -3%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 -3%
AMD FirePro W4170M -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 0%
AMD Radeon 530
AMD Radeon HD 8850M 1%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2%
ATI Radeon HD 5770 2%
ATI Radeon HD 5770 2%
Intel Iris Graphics 550 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M 3%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 1904%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
30891 Points (16%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 16614     avg: 17513     median: 17513 (33%)     max: 18412 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 5     avg: 6.1     median: 6 (4%)     max: 6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (6%)     max: 17 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 13     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (8%)     max: 15 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
min: 14     avg: 20     median: 19 (8%)     max: 25 fps
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 37     avg: 45.2     median: 45 (8%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 29     avg: 45.5     median: 45 (12%)     max: 61 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
18.2 fps (12%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
12 fps (11%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
26.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
31.2 fps (12%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 25     avg: 27.5     median: 27 (7%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 24     avg: 29.6     median: 29 (17%)     max: 34 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 189     avg: 205.5     median: 205 (4%)     max: 222 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 353     avg: 386.5     median: 386 (4%)     max: 420 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 741     avg: 992.3     median: 895 (3%)     max: 1341 Points
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 53     avg: 55.8     median: 55 (12%)     max: 58 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
45.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
18.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare