Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

英伟达Quadro M2200是适用于移动工作站的中端显卡。支持DirectX 12(FL 11_0)和OpenGL 4.5。这是一个基于Maxwell的显卡,最有可能是构建在具有640个着色器内核的GM206芯片上。因此,该显卡与消费级别的英伟达GeForce GTX 965M(第二代)类似。Quadro M2200M是为英特尔Kaby Lake一代而打造的。

Quadro系列提供了经过认证的驱动程序,对CAD或DCC等专业应用程序的稳定性和性能进行了优化。比如说,相比于类似规格的GeForce显卡,OpenGL性能应该会更好。

性能

Quadro M2200的最大内核时钟频率是1038 MHz。性能介于老式的Quadro M2000M和Quadro M3000M之间,但通常更接近后者(有时甚至相当于)。游戏性能可与英伟达GeForce GTX 965M(Ti)相媲美也不奇怪。它仅次于新的GeForce GTX 1050(Pascal)。

使用CUDA(Compute Capability 5.0)或OpenCL 1.2,Quadro M2200的核心可用于一般计算。

能耗

Quadro M2200的功耗等级为55瓦TDP(39.1瓦TDP),类似于之前的Quadro M2000M,因此最适合15英寸和更大的笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5508 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count4940 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.4 pt (23%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -94%
...
AMD FirePro M6100 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M395 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 15%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 15%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 326%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (11%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (9%)     max: 1750 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600 -94%
...
AMD Radeon Pro 560 -20%
NVIDIA Quadro P620 -19%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 -19%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs -17%
AMD Radeon R7 370 -16%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q -6%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 19%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q 19%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL 20%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (46%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (27%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (13%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (12%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (18%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (12%)     max: 7425 Points
...
AMD Radeon Pro 460 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M390 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro 560X 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) 6%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI 8%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 702%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (14%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.9 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
111 fps (25%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (13%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (7%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
83.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
78  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
139.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
105.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
214.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
131.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
148.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 fps