华为MateBook D 16 2022评测--多媒体笔记本电脑现在采用16:10格式,并配有数字键盘

新的MateBook D 16 2022得到了很大的更新,采用了全新的金属外壳,16:10显示屏,并首次采用了带有完整数字键盘的键盘。正如已经在MateBook 16s华为将AMD处理器改为新的Alder Lake一代的英特尔处理器。在价格方面,新的MateBook D 16从949欧元(约958美元)起,配备了 酷睿i5-12450H,16GB内存,以及512GB的大尺寸固态硬盘。然而,我们的测试设备配备了 酷睿i7-12700H和相同的其他设备已经花费1299欧元(约1311美元),所以华为对从酷睿i5升级到酷睿i7收取了350欧元(约353美元)的高额费用。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.6 % | 07/2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
80.2 % | 11/2021 | Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450 | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.7 % | 10/2021 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
86 % | 04/2021 | Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6 | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例和设备
华为已经完全重新设计了新的MateBook D 16的外壳,现在主要沿用了MateBook 16s的设计。 MateBook 16s.就外观而言,这两款笔记本电脑几乎没有区别,除了因其不同的屏幕格式(MateBook 16s为3:2,MateBook D 16为16:10)而尺寸略有不同。这绝对是MateBook D 16的升级,我们没有找到很多抱怨的理由,无论是在做工方面,还是在外壳的稳定性方面。
看一下机箱内部还可以看出,华为为两台设备使用了相同的主板。然而,尽管使用相同的处理器,MateBook D 16只收到一个风扇和一个热管。用户只能更换M.2固态硬盘,因为WLAN模块是焊接而成的。与前代产品相比,新的MateBook D 16的宽度和深度反而更小,但两款设备的整体尺寸相当相似。
在连接和它们的数量方面,又与较大的 MateBook 16s但华为省去了Thunderbolt 4连接的许可费,而右侧的两个USB-A端口之一只支持旧的2.0标准。Wi-Fi模块也缺乏对最新的6-GHz网络的支持,但英特尔的AX201卡(Wi-Fi 6)仍然做得很好,你在实践中应该不会遇到任何限制。
新的1080p网络摄像头可以拍出体面的照片,并提供几个有趣的人工智能功能(背景过滤器、物体追踪、调整视角等)。在实践中,这在原则上效果很好,但在启动AI摄像头时,图像印象略显生硬。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=323) | |
Average of class Multimedia (277 - 1497, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=323) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (137 - 1684, n=70, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (925 - 1715, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (759 - 1372, n=8, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (1167 - 1724, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (820 - 1700, n=10, last 2 years) |

输入设备 - MateBook现在有了数字键盘
新款MateBook D 16是华为第一款配备专用数字键盘的笔记本电脑。正如已经在 MateBook 16s,按键行程从1.3毫米增加到1.5毫米,打字体验总体上非常好。我们甚至喜欢它比16s好一点,因为按键的声音略小。 反馈很精确,即使是较长的文本也可以毫无问题地打出来。 和以前一样,垂直方向键仍然较小。有一个白色的、两段式的键盘照明,但它不能通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮现在放在右上方,包含一个指纹传感器。
ClickPad稍微向左偏移,这在某些情况下可能需要一些时间来适应。键盘工作得非常好,我们在实践中没有遇到任何问题,但点击的声音仍然很响。
显示屏--华为现在使用16:10的面板
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 1387:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 34% | 8% | 9% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 99.9 51% | 74 12% | 74.1 12% | 66.8 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.4 | 100 4% | 98.7 2% | 99.4 3% | 99 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.3 | 99.9 46% | 74.5 9% | 75.8 11% | 69 1% |
Response Times | 89% | 57% | -79% | 0% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.5 ? | 2.2 ? 93% | 13 ? 57% | 49.2 ? -61% | 25 ? 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.7 ? | 2.9 ? 84% | 8 ? 57% | 36.8 ? -97% | 22 ? -18% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 2500 ? | |||
Screen | 29% | 13% | -2% | 22% | |
Brightness middle | 319 | 384.5 21% | 356 12% | 296.8 -7% | 352 10% |
Brightness | 317 | 388 22% | 322 2% | 292 -8% | 330 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 98 9% | 80 -11% | 87 -3% | 89 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.27 -17% | 0.21 9% | 0.28 -22% | |
Contrast | 1387 | 1319 -5% | 1413 2% | 1257 -9% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.53 26% | 2.4 29% | 2.56 25% | 1.35 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.1 | 6.16 24% | 4.42 45% | 4.76 41% | 2.58 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.86 -133% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 1.6 72% | 2.81 51% | 2.6 54% | 2.02 65% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.24 98% | 2.4 92% | 2.07 106% | 2.49 88% |
CCT | 7433 87% | 6464 101% | 6294 103% | 6628 98% | 6445 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 51% /
41% | 26% /
19% | -24% /
-11% | 8% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.7 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise | |
↘ 16.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 华为使用Alder Lake
除了我们的测试装置采用 酷睿i7-12700H外,华为还提供入门级机型,配备 酷睿i5-12450H.然而,这款酷睿i5带来了一些缺点,如效率较低的核心和明显较慢的iGPU。直到现在我们还无法测试这款CPU,但与Ryzen 5 5600H相比,可能不会有任何性能优势。 Ryzen 5 5600H老款MateBook D 16的性能优势。MateBook D 16只提供LPDDR4X-3733内存,还没有LPDDR5模块。
测试条件
预装的PC管理器提供两种性能模式。处理器被允许在短时间内消耗高达64瓦的功率,之后迅速趋于平稳,为35瓦(平衡模式)或40瓦(性能模式,仅在主电源操作中)。这意味着,即使在性能模式下,该处理器仍然低于其标称的TDP(45瓦)。由于风扇的声音明显变大,我们不能推荐性能模式,在下面的所有测量和基准测试中使用了平衡模式。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-12700H
我们已经对酷睿i7-12700H进行了多次测试,请您参考我们的 我们的CPU页面了解更多技术细节。相比之下 MateBook 16s有两个风扇,MateBook D 16只使用一个风扇,导致性能降低。在短时间内的64瓦和持续的35瓦,我们的测试装置的性能仍然明显低于Core i7-12700H的能力。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
然而,在基准测试中,结果往往还是不错的,因为处理器能够从这里的高功率限制中受益--但也只是在测试开始时短暂地达到64瓦的最大值。 在持续的负载下,i7-12700H很快就被迫节流其性能。在单核运行中,性能核心的高性能也以高功耗为代价。在电池运行时,处理器的功耗被限制在40瓦(后来是35瓦),但有趣的是,这对性能几乎没有任何影响。由于CPU的温度在40瓦时不会增加那么多,所以CPU能够更长时间地保持这个数值,只是后来降到35瓦。例如,在CBR23多重测试中,只有2%的差异,这是可以忽略不计的。你可以找到更多的CPU基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19250, n=36) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Average of class Multimedia (3121 - 18444, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1825, n=35) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (819 - 1940, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7382, n=36) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (961 - 7040, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 702, n=36) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (316 - 739, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2903, n=41) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (385 - 2894, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=37) | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average of class Multimedia (119 - 279, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average of class Multimedia (183.3 - 1188, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (171 - 732, n=35) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (11122 - 72912, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5863, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average of class Multimedia (2898 - 6186, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=36) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Average of class Multimedia (2427 - 14376, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=36) | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Average of class Multimedia (843 - 1887, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.4, n=37) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (1.39 - 21, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (30.2 - 99.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 92, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.4155 - 1.002, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (2677 - 15700, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 15078, n=35) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (12762 - 98165, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 75435, n=35) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 3791, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (841 - 4254, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 102833, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (31314 - 107161, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9928, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 12542, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7417 - 54148, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 37158, n=35) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 136241, n=35) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (13739 - 147249, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (228 - 1193, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 7989, n=35) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1501 - 8371, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 46643, n=35) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8034 - 45694, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
系统性能
新款MateBook D 16的主观性能印象非常好,我们在测试中没有遇到任何问题。这一印象也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5726 - 6281, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3580 - 8083, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7715 - 11699, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5462 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7024 - 8038, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6667 - 7401, n=5) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2679 - 11777, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (970 - 2138, n=27, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (921 - 2038, n=27, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (933 - 2210, n=27, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1012 - 2234, n=27, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 Score | 6041 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31252 - 77803, n=35) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 69828, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (32677 - 76185, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (22183 - 70337, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (30592 - 66475, n=35) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21133 - 66799, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (76.2 - 119, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 122, n=36) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
我们测试装置中的M.2-2280固态硬盘提供512GB的存储容量。不幸的是,它在交付状态下被不必要地分区,系统驱动器上只有略多于70GB的可用空间。PCIe 3.0-x4固态硬盘的传输率还可以,但用户必须在没有现代PCIe 4.0连接的情况下生活。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
华为没有提供专用的GPU,所以只有 Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)的处理器。这为日常任务提供了足够的性能,包括高分辨率视频的再现,但在游戏时,iGPU很快就会失去动力。这意味着你被限制在要求不高的游戏和经常降低的细节设置。至少,在持续负载和电池运行的情况下,图形性能也保持稳定。你可以找到更多的GPU基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |