华为MateBook D 16 2022评测--多媒体笔记本电脑现在采用16:10格式，并配有数字键盘

Name: Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Brand: Huawei

英特尔阿尔德湖的刹车。

到目前为止，MateBook D 16一直是一款采用AMD CPU的经济型多媒体笔记本电脑，但2022年的新机型采用了英特尔的Alder Lake处理器。然而，这只能在刹车的情况下运行，价格也增加到1299欧元（约1311美元）。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/18/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Intel Laptop / Notebook Windows

新的MateBook D 16 2022得到了很大的更新，采用了全新的金属外壳，16:10显示屏，并首次采用了带有完整数字键盘的键盘。正如已经在MateBook 16s华为将AMD处理器改为新的Alder Lake一代的英特尔处理器。在价格方面，新的MateBook D 16从949欧元（约958美元）起，配备了酷睿i5-12450H，16GB内存，以及512GB的大尺寸固态硬盘。然而，我们的测试设备配备了酷睿i7-12700H和相同的其他设备已经花费1299欧元（约1311美元），所以华为对从酷睿i5升级到酷睿i7收取了350欧元（约353美元）的高额费用。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (MateBook D 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, RAM: 1867 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR4X-3733, dual-channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, 512 GB

, 409 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.4 x 356.7 x 248.7

Battery

60 Wh, 5195 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU (USB-C), Huawei PC Manager, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.7 kg, Power Supply: 181 g

Price

1299 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	18.4 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
80.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2021	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	1.9 kg	18.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	2 kg	18.99 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
86 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2021	Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6	1.7 kg	18.4 mm	16.10"	1920x1080

案例和设备

华为已经完全重新设计了新的MateBook D 16的外壳，现在主要沿用了MateBook 16s的设计。 MateBook 16s.就外观而言，这两款笔记本电脑几乎没有区别，除了因其不同的屏幕格式（MateBook 16s为3:2，MateBook D 16为16:10）而尺寸略有不同。这绝对是MateBook D 16的升级，我们没有找到很多抱怨的理由，无论是在做工方面，还是在外壳的稳定性方面。

看一下机箱内部还可以看出，华为为两台设备使用了相同的主板。然而，尽管使用相同的处理器，MateBook D 16只收到一个风扇和一个热管。用户只能更换M.2固态硬盘，因为WLAN模块是焊接而成的。与前代产品相比，新的MateBook D 16的宽度和深度反而更小，但两款设备的整体尺寸相当相似。

在连接和它们的数量方面，又与较大的 MateBook 16s但华为省去了Thunderbolt 4连接的许可费，而右侧的两个USB-A端口之一只支持旧的2.0标准。Wi-Fi模块也缺乏对最新的6-GHz网络的支持，但英特尔的AX201卡（Wi-Fi 6）仍然做得很好，你在实践中应该不会遇到任何限制。

新的1080p网络摄像头可以拍出体面的照片，并提供几个有趣的人工智能功能（背景过滤器、物体追踪、调整视角等）。在实践中，这在原则上效果很好，但在启动AI摄像头时，图像印象略显生硬。

尺寸比较

Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 DIN A4 ❌

左边：USB-C 3.2 Gen.1（电力传输），USB-C 3.2 Gen.1（电力传输，DisplayPort ALT模式），HDMI 2.0，3.5毫米立体声

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1367 (960^min - 1479^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	920 (480^min - 988^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	884 (449^min - 951^max) MBit/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	604 (417^min - 698^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1339 (1289^min - 1364^max) MBit/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1285 (1029^min - 1399^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1220 (1150^min - 1286^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1192 (1109^min - 1450^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Multimedia (668 - 1978, n=64, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1372 (1168^min - 1507^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (438 - 1715, n=73)	1272 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1376^min - 1661^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (689 - 1789, n=64, last 2 years)	1448 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=78)	1406 MBit/s -11%

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1376-1661)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1372 (1168-1507)

ColorChecker Huawei MateBook D 16 2022: 10.69 ∆E min: 5.11 - max: 18.29 ∆E

输入设备 - MateBook现在有了数字键盘

新款MateBook D 16是华为第一款配备专用数字键盘的笔记本电脑。正如已经在 MateBook 16s，按键行程从1.3毫米增加到1.5毫米，打字体验总体上非常好。我们甚至喜欢它比16s好一点，因为按键的声音略小。反馈很精确，即使是较长的文本也可以毫无问题地打出来。和以前一样，垂直方向键仍然较小。有一个白色的、两段式的键盘照明，但它不能通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮现在放在右上方，包含一个指纹传感器。

ClickPad稍微向左偏移，这在某些情况下可能需要一些时间来适应。键盘工作得非常好，我们在实践中没有遇到任何问题，但点击的声音仍然很响。

显示屏--华为现在使用16：10的面板

华为基本上继续使用哑光IPS面板，但现在它有一个16：10的格式，1920 x 1200像素。图像质量非常好，即使是明亮的地方也不会出现颗粒感。然而，你必须在没有任何特殊功能的情况下生活，因为只有60-Hz刷新率，没有HDR，也没有亮度传感器。

最大亮度略高于300cd/m²，与良好的黑色值相结合，形成了非常好的对比度，几乎是1400:1。我们没有测量任何PWM，响应时间也很好。有一些可见的光晕，特别是在顶部边缘，但IPS面板的视角稳定性没有显示出弱点。


331 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	336 cd/m²
311 cd/m²	319 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
306 cd/m²	305 cd/m²	301 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NV160WUM-NH0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 336 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 316.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 1387:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Display		34%	8%	9%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	66.2	99.9 51%	74 12%	74.1 12%	66.8 1%
sRGB Coverage	96.4	100 4%	98.7 2%	99.4 3%	99 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.3	99.9 46%	74.5 9%	75.8 11%	69 1%
Response Times		89%	57%	-79%	0%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.5 ?(14.2, 16.3)	2.2 ?(1.1, 1.1) 93%	13 ?(6, 7) 57%	49.2 ?(24.8, 24.4) -61%	25 ?(16, 9) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	18.7 ?(9.7, 9)	2.9 ?(1.1, 1.8) 84%	8 ?(4, 4) 57%	36.8 ?(20.8, 16) -97%	22 ?(12, 10) -18%
PWM Frequency		59.5 ?(100)			2500 ?(30)
Screen		29%	13%	-2%	22%
Brightness middle	319	384.5 21%	356 12%	296.8 -7%	352 10%
Brightness	317	388 22%	322 2%	292 -8%	330 4%
Brightness Distribution	90	98 9%	80 -11%	87 -3%	89 -1%
Black Level *	0.23		0.27 -17%	0.21 9%	0.28 -22%
Contrast	1387		1319 -5%	1413 2%	1257 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.4	2.53 26%	2.4 29%	2.56 25%	1.35 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.1	6.16 24%	4.42 45%	4.76 41%	2.58 68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.8			1.86 -133%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.7	1.6 72%	2.81 51%	2.6 54%	2.02 65%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%	2.07 ^106%	2.49 ^88%
CCT	7433 ^87%	6464 ^101%	6294 ^103%	6628 ^98%	6445 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)					63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					99
Total Average (Program / Settings)		51% / 41%	26% / 19%	-24% / -11%	8% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行分析，显示出明显的蓝色色调，结合交付状态下过冷的色温。然而，我们的校准（上面有免费下载的配置文件）能够补救这个问题，同时也降低了颜色偏差。校准后的数值甚至非常好，图像/视频处理绝对可以在sRGB色彩空间中进行。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.7 ms rise
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.2 ms rise
30.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于采用了哑光面板，如果避免阳光直射，你也可以在户外轻松工作。

性能 - 华为使用Alder Lake

除了我们的测试装置采用酷睿i7-12700H外，华为还提供入门级机型，配备酷睿i5-12450H.然而，这款酷睿i5带来了一些缺点，如效率较低的核心和明显较慢的iGPU。直到现在我们还无法测试这款CPU，但与Ryzen 5 5600H相比，可能不会有任何性能优势。 Ryzen 5 5600H老款MateBook D 16的性能优势。MateBook D 16只提供LPDDR4X-3733内存，还没有LPDDR5模块。

测试条件

预装的PC管理器提供两种性能模式。处理器被允许在短时间内消耗高达64瓦的功率，之后迅速趋于平稳，为35瓦（平衡模式）或40瓦（性能模式，仅在主电源操作中）。这意味着，即使在性能模式下，该处理器仍然低于其标称的TDP（45瓦）。由于风扇的声音明显变大，我们不能推荐性能模式，在下面的所有测量和基准测试中使用了平衡模式。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-12700H

我们已经对酷睿i7-12700H进行了多次测试，请您参考我们的我们的CPU页面了解更多技术细节。相比之下 MateBook 16s有两个风扇，MateBook D 16只使用一个风扇，导致性能降低。在短时间内的64瓦和持续的35瓦，我们的测试装置的性能仍然明显低于Core i7-12700H的能力。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø1777 (1730.55-2218.28)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1672 (1578.91-2216.93)

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø851 (831.5-866.44)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1599 (1568.75-1643.18)

Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1378 (1362.03-1401.3)

Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2157 (2075.23-2604.17)

Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø2024 (1871.61-2544.85)

Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1995 (1980.49-2009.14)

然而，在基准测试中，结果往往还是不错的，因为处理器能够从这里的高功率限制中受益--但也只是在测试开始时短暂地达到64瓦的最大值。在持续的负载下，i7-12700H很快就被迫节流其性能。在单核运行中，性能核心的高性能也以高功耗为代价。在电池运行时，处理器的功耗被限制在40瓦（后来是35瓦），但有趣的是，这对性能几乎没有任何影响。由于CPU的温度在40瓦时不会增加那么多，所以CPU能够更长时间地保持这个数值，只是后来降到35瓦。例如，在CBR23多重测试中，只有2%的差异，这是可以忽略不计的。你可以找到更多的CPU基准测试这里.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	84.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	83.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	83.6 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	77.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	67.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H	65.4 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	49.5 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ ^-2! Intel Core i7-1165G7	46.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	45.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63)	15636 Points +40%
Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=82, last 2 years)	15579 Points +39%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	14281 Points +27%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11202 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	10748 (9924.9^min - 10747.5^max) Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10336 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	7713 Points -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	6465 Points -42%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	5609 (5443.41^min - 5609.45^max) Points -50%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2290, n=74, last 2 years)	1822 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	1792 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1784 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62)	1758 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	1520 Points -15%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	1480 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	1431 Points -20%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1338 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1134 Points -36%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63)	5933 Points +40%
Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=66, last 2 years)	5765 Points +36%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	5459 Points +29%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	4248 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	4106 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	3993 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3219 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	2382 Points -44%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	2182 Points -49%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63)	679 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	672 Points
Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=66, last 2 years)	672 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	584 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	565 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	548 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	518 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	454 Points -32%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	2604.2 (2075.23^min - 2604.2^max) Points +17%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	2545 (1871.61^min - 2544.85^max) Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69)	2517 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=73, last 2 years)	2452 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2218 (1730.6^min - 2218^max) Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2217 (1578.91^min - 2216.93^max) Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2009 (1980.49^min - 2009.14^max) Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	1643 (1568.75^min - 1643.18^max) Points -26%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1401 (1362.03^min - 1401.3^max) Points -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	990 Points -55%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	866 (831.5^min - 866.44^max) Points -61%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=68, last 2 years)	263 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	255 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64)	253 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points -11%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	225 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	178 Points -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	176 Points -32%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	542 Seconds * -90%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	542 Seconds * -90%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	349 Seconds * -22%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	286 Seconds *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	272 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=67, last 2 years)	260 Seconds * +9%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	254 Seconds * +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62)	225 Seconds * +21%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62)	60292 MIPS +18%
Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=61, last 2 years)	59171 MIPS +16%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	55285 MIPS +8%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	53767 MIPS +5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	50976 MIPS
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	46675 MIPS -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	37660 MIPS -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	25353 MIPS -50%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	25242 MIPS -50%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=61, last 2 years)	5730 MIPS 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	5725 MIPS 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	5716 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62)	5648 MIPS -1%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5593 MIPS -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	5515 MIPS -4%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	5308 MIPS -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	4947 MIPS -13%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4428 MIPS -23%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	12994 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=65, last 2 years)	12229 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63)	11729 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11321 Points
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7641 Points -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5963 Points -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	4905 Points -57%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=65, last 2 years)	1881 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	1816 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1777 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63)	1732 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1480 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	1447 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1118 Points -37%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)	16.7 fps +21%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=61, last 2 years)	16.7 fps +21%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.1 fps +17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	14.4 fps +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	12.5 fps -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	9.8 fps -29%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.27 fps -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	7.08 fps -49%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	59.5 s * -63%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	52.4 s * -44%
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=62, last 2 years)	50.2 s * -38%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	49.6 s * -36%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	46.9 s * -29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	46.3 s * -27%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)	45.7 s * -26%
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	40.5 s * -11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	36.4 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.607 sec * -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H	0.604 sec * -34%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.563 sec * -25%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.561 sec * -24%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.517 sec * -15%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=61, last 2 years)	0.4809 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)	0.4723 sec * -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4509 sec *
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4441 sec * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2218 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

125.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

257 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4248 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

672 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1784 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

11202 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	95.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	82.2 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	80.2 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	66.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	52.1 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	49.8 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 ^-9! Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=60, last 2 years)	15697 KRay/s +42%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11042 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62)	10834 KRay/s -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	10205 KRay/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	8440 KRay/s -24%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	7197 KRay/s -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=61, last 2 years)	75187 Points +34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56156 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	54513 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62)	52825 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	33986 Points -39%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	30646 Points -45%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=61, last 2 years)	3517 MB/s +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62)	3077 MB/s +14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2693 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	2286 MB/s -15%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	2076 MB/s -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	1770 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62)	97916 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	97156 Points
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=61, last 2 years)	85617 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	72766 Points -25%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	50250 Points -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	49209 Points -49%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	10243 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=61, last 2 years)	9673 Points +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62)	9055 Points +20%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7567 Points
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	4790 Points -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	4676 Points -38%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=60, last 2 years)	37305 Points +35%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	28626 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62)	27939 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27706 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	20669 Points -25%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	18672 Points -33%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99760 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62)	85388 MB/s -14%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	73387 MB/s -26%
Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=61, last 2 years)	72420 MB/s -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	71519 MB/s -28%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	52265 MB/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62)	970 MB/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=61, last 2 years)	952 MB/s +32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	721 MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	592 MB/s -18%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	391 MB/s -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	387 MB/s -46%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=61, last 2 years)	8576 KRay/s +44%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62)	5986 KRay/s +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5951 KRay/s
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	5539 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	4573 KRay/s -23%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	3902 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 58844, n=61, last 2 years)	43344 MPixel/s +12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38728 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62)	33149 MPixel/s -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	21091 MPixel/s -46%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	19463 MPixel/s -50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	17857 MPixel/s -54%

系统性能

新款MateBook D 16的主观性能印象非常好，我们在测试中没有遇到任何问题。这一印象也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=57, last 2 years)	6848 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	6282 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	6041 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5541 - 6281, n=7)	5905 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5333 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5120 Points -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5110 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	11644 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=7)	11168 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=57, last 2 years)	10497 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	9841 Points -15%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9551 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9123 Points -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8931 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=57, last 2 years)	8912 Points +18%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8721 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8554 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	8413 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	7558 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	7517 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6690 - 8038, n=7)	7285 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=57, last 2 years)	9487 Points +40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	8125 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6207 - 7401, n=7)	6879 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	6800 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5388 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5283 Points -22%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4373 Points -36%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1864 Points
Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=67, last 2 years)	1744 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=7)	1717 Points -8%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1790 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=7)	1668 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=67, last 2 years)	1650 Points -8%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=67, last 2 years)	1974 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1959 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=7)	1815 Points -7%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1812 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=7)	1601 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=67, last 2 years)	1438 Points -21%

PCMark 10 Score		6041 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 104459, n=61, last 2 years)	74970 MB/s +28%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58627 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62)	53891 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	35934 MB/s -39%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	35627 MB/s -39%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	32249 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=61, last 2 years)	76439 MB/s +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62)	57340 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57124 MB/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	43983 MB/s -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	40492 MB/s -29%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	38591 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=61, last 2 years)	74899 MB/s +28%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58689 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62)	54793 MB/s -7%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	43873 MB/s -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	39037 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	36551 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=61, last 2 years)	113 ns * -3%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	109.5 ns *
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	84.5 ns * +23%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, Vega 6	83.2 ns * +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	82.3 ns * +25%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)	77.8 ns * +29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4888 μs * -493%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	1700 μs * -106%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	824.9 μs *
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	722 μs * +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	629 μs * +24%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们测试装置中的M.2-2280固态硬盘提供512GB的存储容量。不幸的是，它在交付状态下被不必要地分区，系统驱动器上只有略多于70GB的可用空间。PCIe 3.0-x4固态硬盘的传输率还可以，但用户必须在没有现代PCIe 4.0连接的情况下生活。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3190.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2054.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 868.38 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 627.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.32 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 235.18 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1143.85 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1208.68 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	84 pt
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	77.6 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	75.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	75.1 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	73.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	47.6 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	35.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (453 - 4432, n=61, last 2 years)	2946 MB/s +46%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (2012 - 2849, n=3)	2510 MB/s +25%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2420 (2407.74^min - 2419.69^max) MB/s +20%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2012 (2006.14^min - 2011.76^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1998 (1994.39^min - 1997.95^max) MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	1465 (1443.52^min - 1464.65^max) MB/s -27%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1391 (1369.23^min - 1391.19^max) MB/s -31%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia (384 - 5711, n=61, last 2 years)	3127 MB/s +117%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2463 (2452.2^min - 2462.69^max) MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2169 (2134.06^min - 2168.73^max) MB/s +51%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1438 - 2518, n=3)	2086 MB/s +45%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1438 (1113.25^min - 1437.81^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	897 (879.46^min - 896.63^max) MB/s -38%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	500 (432.64^min - 499.96^max) MB/s -65%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (467 - 7126, n=61, last 2 years)	5320 MB/s +85%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3553 (3189.77^min - 3552.79^max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3422 (3008.78^min - 3421.71^max) MB/s +19%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (2883 - 3415, n=3)	3163 MB/s +10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2883 (2661.83^min - 2882.85^max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	2326 (1740.51^min - 2326.37^max) MB/s -19%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1576 (1400.27^min - 1576.42^max) MB/s -45%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (247 - 6898, n=61, last 2 years)	4121 MB/s +116%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2981 (2954.26^min - 2980.8^max) MB/s +56%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2773 (2759.64^min - 2772.85^max) MB/s +45%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1911 - 2917, n=3)	2386 MB/s +25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1911 (1287.86^min - 1911.3^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	964 (961.3^min - 964.44^max) MB/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	497 (409.78^min - 496.82^max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=61, last 2 years)	62.4 MB/s +45%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	54.9 (54.55^min - 54.85^max) MB/s +27%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (43.1 - 63.3, n=3)	54 MB/s +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	52.5 (51.54^min - 52.54^max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	47.6 (47.34^min - 47.64^max) MB/s +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	45 (44.59^min - 44.97^max) MB/s +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	43.1 (42.42^min - 43.05^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (270 - 279, n=3)	274 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	273 (267.01^min - 272.55^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	210 (208.69^min - 209.7^max) MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	199 (196.54^min - 199.11^max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Multimedia (44.4 - 378, n=61, last 2 years)	164.5 MB/s -40%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	147 (145.94^min - 147.26^max) MB/s -46%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	135 (133.49^min - 135.4^max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1391 (1387.88^min - 1390.66^max) MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1336 - 1391, n=3)	1371 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (190.3 - 4881, n=61, last 2 years)	1324 MB/s -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1155 (1153.06^min - 1154.76^max) MB/s -17%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1149 (1145.51^min - 1148.68^max) MB/s -17%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	663 (660.46^min - 662.8^max) MB/s -52%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	345 (344.78^min - 345.19^max) MB/s -75%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2152 (2146.6^min - 2151.78^max) MB/s +73%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1241 - 1512, n=3)	1353 MB/s +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1337 (940.74^min - 1337.01^max) MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1241 (928.82^min - 1240.76^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (164.6 - 4074, n=61, last 2 years)	981 MB/s -21%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	452 (438.46^min - 452.17^max) MB/s -64%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	362 (349.17^min - 361.87^max) MB/s -71%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5192 Points +29%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5087 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia (482 - 9972, n=58, last 2 years)	4824 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	4039 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (3787 - 4264, n=3)	4030 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	2804 Points -31%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1754 Points -57%
Score Read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1944 Points +32%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1806 Points +22%
Average of class Multimedia (192 - 3501, n=58, last 2 years)	1534 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1477 Points
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1279 - 1574, n=3)	1443 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	1059 Points -28%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	515 Points -65%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia (191 - 4684, n=58, last 2 years)	2563 Points +39%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2377 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2248 Points +22%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1839 - 1895, n=3)	1869 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1839 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	1256 Points -32%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	993 Points -46%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (484 - 5730, n=58, last 2 years)	4241 MB/s +51%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (2769 - 2967, n=3)	2846 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2829 MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2802 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2541 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	2077 MB/s -26%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1402 MB/s -50%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia (344 - 5651, n=58, last 2 years)	2815 MB/s +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2555 MB/s +36%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2423 MB/s +29%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1879 - 2328, n=3)	2159 MB/s +15%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1879 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	778 MB/s -59%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	643 MB/s -66%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	61.03 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (59.5 - 62.2, n=3)	60.9 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (17.5 - 97.4, n=58, last 2 years)	60.4 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	56 MB/s -8%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	52.4 MB/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	49.6 MB/s -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	42.06 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	248.56 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (236 - 249, n=3)	244 MB/s -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	236.1 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia (43.1 - 328, n=58, last 2 years)	189.5 MB/s -24%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	140.8 MB/s -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	129.6 MB/s -48%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	126.1 MB/s -49%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1633 MB/s +44%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1481 MB/s +30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1135.53 MB/s
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (920 - 1237, n=3)	1098 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (125.7 - 2989, n=58, last 2 years)	1050 MB/s -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	801 MB/s -29%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	322.3 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Multimedia (75.2 - 3975, n=58, last 2 years)	2092 MB/s +49%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2009 MB/s +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1863 MB/s +33%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (1403 - 1416, n=3)	1409 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1402.68 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	942 MB/s -33%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	788 MB/s -44%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	0.079 ms * -216%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	0.077 ms * -208%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.072 ms * -188%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	0.06 ms * -140%
Average of class Multimedia (0.019 - 0.168, n=58, last 2 years)	0.05286 ms * -111%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.025 ms *
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (0.02 - 0.029, n=3)	0.02467 ms * +1%
Access Time Write
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.135 ms * -744%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Kingston OM3PDP3512B	0.073 ms * -356%
Average of class Multimedia (0.014 - 0.754, n=58, last 2 years)	0.06743 ms * -321%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	0.029 ms * -81%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	0.029 ms * -81%
Average Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD (0.015 - 0.019, n=3)	0.01667 ms * -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.016 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022: Ø2838 (2296.17-2855.06)

图形卡

华为没有提供专用的GPU，所以只有 Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)的处理器。这为日常任务提供了足够的性能，包括高分辨率视频的再现，但在游戏时，iGPU很快就会失去动力。这意味着你被限制在要求不高的游戏和经常降低的细节设置。至少，在持续负载和电池运行的情况下，图形性能也保持稳定。你可以找到更多的GPU基准测试这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	99.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	92.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	49.5 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	42 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	34.2 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	26.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3765 - 45564, n=60, last 2 years)	19240 Points +177%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	16944 Points +144%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	9580 Points +38%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	6944 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=206)	6366 Points -8%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6293 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4505 Points -35%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	52180 Points +73%
Average of class Multimedia (16765 - 130614, n=26, last 2 years)	50702 Points +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	33806 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	30101 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 39880, n=184)	26660 Points -11%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	24343 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	23044 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (2328 - 34440, n=63, last 2 years)	13854 Points +143%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	12611 Points +121%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	5710 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	5573 Points -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6624, n=219)	4935 Points -14%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	4496 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	2985 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (696 - 13010, n=64, last 2 years)	5309 Points +204%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	4783 Points +174%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	2300 Points +32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	1747 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1890, n=216)	1498 Points -14%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1333 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	914 Points -48%

3DMark 11 Performance		7649 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24596 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5391 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1982 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14 (13-15)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	123.3	107.8	24.9	10.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	102	66	35	14
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	139.2	98.3	69.5	63.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	47.9	26.8	26.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	50.1	36.3	41.8
Strange Brigade (2018)	98.7	45.9	36.4	29.3
F1 2021 (2021)	108.4	54.8	43	30

排放和电源管理

噪声排放

即使在低负荷的情况下，单风扇也经常以低速运行，但这通常几乎听不见。特别是在一些负载阶段结束后，风扇仍然以略高于30 dB(A)的速度运行数分钟，即使在完全空闲的情况下也是如此，这在日常工作中可能真的很恼人。AMD的前身明显更安静，特别是在空闲运行和低负荷时。

在负载情况下，风扇很快就达到了39.8 dB(A)的最大音量，不管你是在玩游戏还是只对处理器施加一些负载。在可选的性能模式下，它甚至达到了近48分贝（A），考虑到40瓦的TDP和大型机箱，这简直太吵了。就因为这个原因，我们不推荐使用性能模式。我们没有注意到任何额外的电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.2 / 25.8 / 30.5 dB(A)
Load		39.8 / 39.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)

	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B	Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise		1%	2%	-6%	3%
off / environment *	24.2	23.4 3%	25 -3%	24.4 -1%	25.5 -5%
Idle Minimum *	24.2	23.6 2%	25 -3%	24.4 -1%	25.5 -5%
Idle Average *	25.8	23.6 9%	25 3%	24.4 5%	25.5 1%
Idle Maximum *	30.5	23.6 23%	25 18%	24.4 20%	25.5 16%
Load Average *	39.8	41 -3%	44.5 -12%	48.3 -21%	33 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	39.8	42.9 -8%		48.9 -23%
Load Maximum *	39.8	47 -18%	36.5 8%	48.9 -23%	42.1 -6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

热量的发展集中在顶部的左侧，这也是单风扇的位置。在压力测试中，底部明显变热，但这并不导致这里有任何限制，反正在日常操作中不会有任何问题。在压力测试中，处理器的TDP迅速下降到35瓦，但之后就保持稳定。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.8 °C	41.4 °C	31.9 °C
38.6 °C	39.2 °C	31.1 °C
28.4 °C	27.5 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 34.2 °C


35.1 °C	47.3 °C	42.8 °C
32.7 °C	36.7 °C	33.2 °C
28.6 °C	31.1 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 47.3 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 58.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


28.3 °C	28.2 °C	26.3 °C
27.6 °C	28 °C	26.3 °C
26 °C	25.6 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 28.3 °C
Average: 26.9 °C


27.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.3 °C
26.7 °C	27.8 °C	27.8 °C
26 °C	26.7 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 27.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.7 °C	40 °C	27.9 °C
37.2 °C	38.6 °C	29.6 °C
27.2 °C	26.2 °C	26.7 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 32.6 °C


34.9 °C	46.4 °C	41.5 °C
32.7 °C	39.9 °C	32.7 °C
27.6 °C	29.4 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 34.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).

	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Heat		-7%	-13%	-15%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.8	48.8 -17%	65.3 -56%	46.4 -11%	42.6 -2%
Maximum Bottom *	47.3	42 11%	55.4 -17%	54.8 -16%	41.7 12%
Idle Upper Side *	28.3	30 -6%	25.4 10%	31.4 -11%	27.8 2%
Idle Bottom *	30.2	35 -16%	26.8 11%	36.6 -21%	27.6 9%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

这两个扬声器不再位于键盘旁边，但它们现在向底部输出声音。因此，根据表面的情况，它们可能听起来很闷。扬声器比前代产品的声音略大，但也缺乏压力。然而，性能很好，特别是在中音和高音部分，有利于声音的再现。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

如果仅处理器就能消耗64瓦，那么紧凑的65瓦充电器无法提供足够的CPU高负荷下的全部电力消耗就不足为奇了。系统将从电池中最多吸取24瓦，只有在TDP约为38瓦时，才不再使用电池。正如已经在 MateBook 16s之前，华为在错误的地方偷工减料，该设备应该包括一个90瓦的充电器。在高负荷或游戏时，这也导致了充电器的高温。但新机型也比其 AMD的前辈在空闲运行期间。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.7 / 1.1 Watt
Idle	6.1 / 10.6 / 11.5 Watt
Load	65.5 / 68.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø61.2 (56.9-67.9)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø62.1 (54.1-68.4)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.9 (51.2-68.5)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø68.3 (67.4-68.4)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø41.4 (37.1-61.7)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62 (57.6-68.4)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø37.7 (35.5-62.5)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø56.9 (45.2-65.8)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.44 (7.1-11.5)

电池寿命

即使电池容量从56瓦特略微增加到60瓦特，但由于耗电量增加，电池寿命也变差了。在我们的WLAN测试中，在150cd/m²的亮度下（相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的51%），该设备只持续了7小时多一点，而在最大亮度下，只有5.5小时。前代产品在这里持续的时间明显更长，分别为9小时或6.5小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 103)		7h 04min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 103)		5h 34min

	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 42 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-15%	28%	39%	27%	61%
WiFi v1.3	424	361 -15%	543 28%	591 39%	538 27%	684 ?(262 - 1204, n=69, last 2 years) 61%
Witcher 3 ultra					59

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 良好的键盘

+ 1080p网络摄像头

+ 哑光IPS显示屏

Cons

- 没有Thunderbolt

- 老化的USB2.0连接

- 不必要的SSD分区

- 电源太弱

- 酷睿i7的性能仍然明显低于其潜力

结论 - 昂贵的英特尔CPU被扼杀了

原则上，新的MateBook D 16的判决书与 MateBook 16s因为改用英特尔处理器也带来了几个问题。这些问题主要包括价格的增加，特别是如果你考虑到酷睿i7带来的性能明显下降，其中一个风扇的下降。此外，华为放弃了Thunderbolt 4，右侧的一个USB-A连接只支持老式的USB 2.0标准。

虽然CPU性能（特别是单核）比前代产品好，但我们曾用Ryzen 5 5600H测试过。因此，为了公平起见，我们应该用新的MateBook D 16与Core i5-12450H进行比较，它也配备了较慢的GPU。该版本可能会在与旧型号的性能比较中失利，这也意味着我们很难推荐949欧元（约958美元）的基本版本。此外，英特尔处理器更高的功耗也导致了更短的电池寿命，而且65瓦的充电器也太弱。

老款MateBook D 16主要以其良好的性价比而令人信服。但配备英特尔酷睿i7的新机型不再是这种情况，同时制造商还在一些地方偷工减料（没有雷电4，USB-2.0端口老化，充电器太弱），这对于增加的1299欧元（约1331美元）的价格根本不合适。

另一方面，我们当然也应该提到，华为改进了外壳质量，带有数字键盘和较长键程的全尺寸键盘也给人留下了好印象。因此，一些轻微的价格上涨可能是合理的，但不是400欧元（约404美元）。虽然改用英特尔处理器在纸面上看起来不错，但如果MateBook D 16配备了AMD处理器，它将是一个明显更有吸引力和（很可能）也更快的整体包装。

价格和可用性

新的MateBook D 16已经在欧洲推出。在其市场介绍中，华为包括MateView GT 27和一个免费背包。，配备较弱的酷睿i5-12450H的入门级机型价格为949欧元(约958美元)，而我们的测试单元采用Core i7-12700H，价格为1299欧元(~$1311).

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 - 07/15/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

89 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

90%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

55 / 80 → 69%

Weight

67 / 20-72 → 90%

Battery

75 / 95 → 78%

Display

85%

Games Performance

72 / 90 → 80%

Application Performance

90 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

79%

Noise

79 / 95 → 83%

Audio

73%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Average

76%

84%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 545 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 569358 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MateBook D 16 2022评测--多媒体笔记本电脑现在采用16:10格式，并配有数字键盘

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-07-18 (Update: 2022-07-18)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例和设备

尺寸比较

输入设备 - MateBook现在有了数字键盘

显示屏--华为现在使用16：10的面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 华为使用Alder Lake

测试条件

处理器 - 酷睿i7-12700H

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放和电源管理

噪声排放

温度

发言人

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 audio analysis

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ audio analysis

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 昂贵的英特尔CPU被扼杀了

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison