Geekom XT12 Pro 评测:时尚的 NUC 迷你 PC 替代品,配备英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H、32 GB DDR4 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘
作为 Geekom XT12 Pro,这款迷你电脑应该以出色的性能和良好的效率为其加分。然而,Geekom 只安装了 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H.不过,这颗 SoC 属于 Alder Lake-H 系列,两年前就已推出。关于这款处理器在当前对决中的表现,稍后会有更多介绍。毕竟,Geekom 在这里使用的是顶级型号,尽管目前还没有其他配置。该设备配备 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,目前的售价为 749 欧元。这已经包含了折扣,因为制造商的零售价为 899 欧元。这个定价是否合理是个合理的问题,我们将在了解其与竞争对手的性能对比后再作解答。不过,从价格来看,制造商已经为自己设定了很高的标准。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % | 04/2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
87.3 % | 12/2023 | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 750 g | 52.3 mm |
85.1 % | 01/2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 16384 MB | 1.2 kg | 66 mm |
83.4 % | 04/2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
83.1 % | 08/2023 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 558 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % | 03/2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
78.8 % | 08/2023 | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 438 g | 20 mm |
Geekom XT12 Pro 的详细信息
外壳 - 金属和塑料完美结合
Geekom XT12 Pro 非常小巧,在极小的空间内集成了大量技术。XT12 Pro 放在桌面上仅需 11.7 x 11.2 厘米。XT12 Pro 的材料选用了金属和塑料。盖子使用了塑料,但稳定性并没有因此受到影响。不过,Geekom A7 还是显得更高档一些。金属外壳做工精良,可以从底部打开。Geekom 还用它为大容量存储设备散热。在颜色方面,Geekom XT12 Pro 只有银色和白色两种。制造商不能否认它与 英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 桌面版套件.Geekom 声称,尽管这两款设备看起来几乎一模一样,但它们实际上采用的是内部设计。
Geekom XT12 可以通过附带的 VESA 支架安装到显示器上。
连接性 - 多种选择和 2x USB4
Geekom 为 XT12 Pro 提供了许多有用的外部接口。这些接口分布在前部和后部。四个 USB-A 接口和两个 UBS-C 接口绰绰有余,可以满足所有需求。Type-C 端口还支持 USB4,如果有合适的配件,几乎可以无限扩展 XT12 Pro 的用途。不仅可以通过 HDMI 直接连接屏幕,还可以连接 USB4。这意味着该迷你电脑可同时与四个屏幕连接。此外,还可以进行网络连接。
交流
Geekom XT12 Pro 采用与 Geekom A7 相同的无线模块。联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 无线局域网模块虽然不能达到最佳数值,但足以满足正常使用中的数据传输。如果可能,应主要使用 6 GHz 频率范围。在传输大量数据时,与稍慢的 5 GHz 频率范围相比,性能上的差异已经非常明显。此外,Geekom XT12 Pro 还可以处理有线网络连接。数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。
配件
Geekom XT12 Pro 配备了所需的一切。除了 120 瓦的电源装置外,包装盒内还有一个 VESA 支架。此外,还附带了 HDMI 连接线和 Geekom 必备的感谢卡。
维护
打开 Geekom XT12 Pro 不会有任何大问题:四颗易于触及的螺丝将底板固定在外壳上。松开螺丝后,底板和固态硬盘散热器就可以取下了。由于使用了导热垫,在拆卸时要小心一些。然后就可以轻松访问内存和大容量存储器了。设备本身可以容纳另一个固态硬盘。不过,这里只能安装长度为 42 毫米的 SATA 固态硬盘。
性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 拥有 14 个内核和 20 个线程
Geekom XT12 Pro 仅有我们测试的版本。英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 提供了非常坚实的基础,即使是对性能要求极高的任务也能轻松胜任。再加上 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,您就可以轻松应对各种任务了。
测试条件
在 Geekom XT12 Pro 的所有性能测试中,我们都使用了 "最高性能 "电源方案。根据我们的测试标准,只有在功耗和噪音测量中出现偏差。 测试标准.
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H基于 Alder Lake 架构,结合了 6P 和 8E 内核。这两个核心可为用户提供 20 个线程。即使经过两年多的时间,这款 SoC 仍然没有过时,相比之下,我们可以看到它与更现代的 AMD Ryzen APU 之间存在合理的差距。
在功耗限制方面,Geekom 将英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 的最大功耗限制在 80 瓦,尽管有 35 瓦的永久可用功耗。不过,我们在任何时候都没有达到最大值。在这一点上,我们已经可以说明这一点。在测试中,我们经常只能看到 60 瓦左右的功率,这意味着制造商并没有充分挖掘这里的潜力。尽管如此,SoC 的运行还是符合制造商的规格要求,因为它的功率始终保持在 35 瓦。在与竞争对手的对决中,我们的测试样品经常不得不承认失败。在 AIDA64 基准测试中也是如此。老式 DDR4 内存的劣势在这里显露无遗。
您可以在这里找到更多的处理器基准测试结果 这里.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A |
WinRAR - Result | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 27538, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 116903, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 5096, n=102, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 119802, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 15525, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 62378, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 1233, n=102, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 14722, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 45560, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 |
Geekom XT12 Pro 在 Cinebench R15 多环测试中的表现
在 Cinebench R15 连续循环中,我们可以看到 Geekom 在这里安装了性能相对较低的散热装置。只有在开始时,英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 才能提供明显更好的结果。从第二次运行开始,性能明显下降,这意味着我们的测试样品只能排在倒数第二位。
系统性能
Geekom XT12 Pro 在系统性能测试中表现出色,与单纯的 CPU 测试相比,我们现在甚至可以看到我们的测试样品处于中场位置。不过,这也显示了 DDR4 与 DDR5 相比的劣势:所有基于 DDR4 的系统都以明显的优势紧随速度更快的配备 DDR5 的微型电脑,其中包括 Geekom A7是其中表现最好的。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 71990, n=102, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 75449, n=102, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 154.6, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们无法记录 Geekom XT12 Pro 上网时延迟增加的情况。只有在播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟才会攀升。不过,我们的测试样本只有在使用 Prime95 满负荷运行时才达到最大值。尽管如此,XT12 Pro 仍可用作流媒体客户端,因为在任何时候都不会出现掉帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Geekom 在测试样品中安装了一块来自 Lexar 的固态硬盘,存储空间为 1 TB。原则上,只要没有持续的负载,安装的固态硬盘就能充分发挥性能。这就是 Lexar 固态硬盘出现问题的地方,导致性能不得不大幅降低。这里的主要问题是散热垫连接不正确,因为这两个散热垫都不在它们应该在的位置上。我们在缺失的区域安装了相同厚度的散热垫,从而解决了问题。我们已经通知了制造商,以便他们进行纠正。据 Geekom 称,该问题正在得到解决,今后的批次产品应安装正确的导热垫。根据我们的研究,这个问题似乎不仅影响我们的设备。
Geekom XT12 Pro 可以安装两个固态硬盘。不过,这里必须注意外形尺寸,因为第二个 M.2 插槽仅支持长度为 42 毫米的 SATA 固态硬盘。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 负责 3D 计算和图像输出。它拥有 96 个 EU,是该系列中速度最快的型号。不过,它现在已经是老型号了,明显不如竞争对手。英特尔只是在新一代流星湖处理器中更新了 iGPU 的架构。举个例子,你可以看看 Acemagic F2A.但即便如此,它也不如 AMD 的强大 iGPU。Geekom 自己提出了 A7 - 是其产品组合中极为小巧的设备,配备了 AMD Radeon 780M性能明显高于 Geekom XT12 Pro。
更多比较和基准测试请参见我们的 GPU 对比表.
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.3 - 20, n=17) | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.7 - 21.7, n=17) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1560 - 4590, n=8) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 |
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Khadas Mind, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 752% | -4% | 32% | 771% | -2% | -4% | 438% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 40.1 | 85 112% | 40.9 2% | 49.8 24% | 84.7 111% | 41 2% | 37.8 -6% | 69.9 ? 74% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 37.1 | 89.8 142% | 41.2 11% | 48.2 30% | 89 140% | 35.4 -5% | 39.4 6% | 62 ? 67% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 26.9 | 51.1 90% | 9.64 -64% | 23.1 -14% | 55.4 106% | 27.4 2% | 7.37 -73% | 34.6 ? 29% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.4 | 20.1 4925% | 0.41 3% | 0.91 128% | 20.7 5075% | 0.32 -20% | 0.46 15% | 12.4 ? 3000% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 38.3 | 73.4 92% | 39.9 4% | 54.9 43% | 69.7 82% | 39.2 2% | 41.3 8% | 60.7 ? 58% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 11.8 | 61.7 423% | 12.3 4% | 16.9 43% | 60.5 413% | 11.5 -3% | 12 2% | 25.9 ? 119% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 16.6 | 30.1 81% | 17.9 8% | 18.2 10% | 30.3 83% | 17.7 7% | 21.2 28% | 34 ? 105% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 45.3 | 113 149% | 47.2 4% | 42.7 -6% | 116 156% | 46 2% | 41.6 -8% | 69.2 ? 53% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 202% | 0% | 21% | 190% | -0% | 3% | 105% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 40.1 | 86.1 115% | 40.5 1% | 46.4 16% | 83.9 109% | 40.5 1% | 39 -3% | 69.8 ? 74% |
Catia (catia-05) | 51.3 | 132 157% | 59.4 16% | 71.6 40% | 130 153% | 49 -4% | 57.1 11% | 90.6 ? 77% |
Creo (creo-02) | 41.1 | 93.6 128% | 38.8 -6% | 29.6 -28% | 93.4 127% | 39.5 -4% | 37.5 -9% | 68.8 ? 67% |
Energy (energy-02) | 4.5 | 25.8 473% | 4.27 -5% | 5.69 26% | 23.8 429% | 4.32 -4% | 4.34 -4% | 17 ? 278% |
Maya (maya-05) | 47.5 | 108 127% | 44.2 -7% | 59.5 25% | 107 125% | 47.2 -1% | 46.3 -3% | 92.8 ? 95% |
Medical (medical-02) | 14.4 | 79.8 454% | 14.5 1% | 29.7 106% | 77.6 439% | 15.2 6% | 16 11% | 32.8 ? 128% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 17.3 | 30 73% | 17.9 3% | 18.2 5% | 25.4 47% | 18.1 5% | 21.4 24% | 33.6 ? 94% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 57.1 | 107 87% | 55.8 -2% | 44.8 -22% | 109 91% | 55.8 -2% | 53.7 -6% | 73.8 ? 29% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 295% | -2% | 31% | 286% | -3% | 2% | 199% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 3.49 | 12 244% | 2.57 -26% | 5.05 45% | 11.1 218% | 2.66 -24% | 2.67 -23% | 7.03 ? 101% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 3.05 | 15.4 405% | 3.02 -1% | 4.61 51% | 14.1 362% | 3.03 -1% | 2.97 -3% | 11 ? 261% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 14.8 | 31.4 112% | 15.3 3% | 17.9 21% | 31.4 112% | 15.1 2% | 16.9 14% | 29.1 ? 97% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 7.78 | 24.4 214% | 8.2 5% | 10 29% | 24.8 219% | 7.87 1% | 8.82 13% | 18.5 ? 138% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 9.69 | 21 117% | 9.67 0% | 12.9 33% | 20.9 116% | 9.81 1% | 10.1 4% | 20.8 ? 115% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.29 | 61.5 878% | 6.69 6% | 5.7 -9% | 61.4 876% | 6.2 -1% | 6.01 -4% | 40.8 ? 549% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 23.9 | 47.2 97% | 24 0% | 35.4 48% | 47 97% | 24.7 3% | 27.8 16% | 56 ? 134% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 416% /
422% | -2% /
-2% | 28% /
28% | 416% /
421% | -2% /
-2% | 0% /
0% | 247% /
250% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 39673 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30775 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 25978 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7503 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 136854 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24758 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5036 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2405 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1797 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
英特尔 Iris Xe iGPU 在大多数游戏中都显得力不从心。Geekom XT12 Pro 通常只能在低分辨率和最低预设值下达到可玩的帧率。在与竞争对手的性能对比中,我们还看到 Geekom XT12 Pro 的 iGPU 性能与 Khadas Mind和 Minisforum NAD9.不过,要想获得更强的 3D 性能,唯一的选择就是使用外置显卡,可以通过 USB4 连接。
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit |
GRID Legends | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
F1 2021 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 87.7 | 58.9 | 31.4 | 15.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 106.3 | 76.3 | 61.3 | 54.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 42.2 | 22.7 | 16.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.5 | 42.2 | 36 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 50 | 26 | 23 | 22 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 81.7 | 37.9 | 30.9 | 24.8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 39.6 | 21.7 | 18.8 | 18 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 47 | 25 | 24 | 22 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 35.2 | 17.7 | 10.9 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 49.2 | 23.7 | 14.9 | 11.3 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 84.5 | 43.7 | 34.2 | 22.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 94.8 | 46.9 | 36.4 | 26.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 28.8 | 22 | 14.4 | 11.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 42.5 | 38.4 | 28.7 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 38.7 | 35.1 | 25.2 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 16.4 | 13.1 | 11.5 | |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 120 | 81.3 | 73.1 |
配备两个 eGPU 的 Geekom XT12 Pro 性能测试
如果在 Geekom XT12 Pro 上配备 eGPU,3D 性能将大幅提升。我们仔细观察了 XT12 Pro 与 GPD G1、Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的组合。与竞争对手相比,我们的测试样本显示出相当不错的性能。与 AMD 处理器相比,两个 eGPU 和英特尔处理器的组合始终能提供更好的性能。
这些测试仅代表使用 eGPU 时可能达到的性能。这些结果并不影响本测试的总体评分。
配备 GPD G1 的 Geekom XT12 Pro(AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT)
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 159.3 | 148.4 | 118.5 | 74 | 60.7 | 69.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 254 | 184.3 | 125.4 | 70.5 | 55.6 | 47.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.2 | 89.1 | 78.3 | 76.9 | 65 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 162.9 | 106.4 | 71.2 | 55.4 | 32.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.1 | 46 | 33.6 | 25.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 142 | 123 | 115 | 107 | 82 | 45 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 204 | 154.6 | 149.6 | 138.5 | 108.1 | 62.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 125.4 | 89.9 | 86.4 | 79.8 | 61.7 | 34.5 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 126 | 110 | 106 | 93 | 84 | 49 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 77.1 | 62.6 | 55.2 | 45.4 | 38.4 | 26.1 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 138.5 | 98.6 | 73.8 | 60.5 | 46 | 27.1 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 255 | 184.1 | 156.8 | 108.3 | 86.7 | 54.9 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 239 | 203 | 131.8 | 81.5 | 63.3 | 31.4 |
God of War (2022) | 93.9 | 84.4 | 70 | 52.1 | 43.3 | 30.2 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 96.5 | 82.3 | 67.3 | 60.2 | 55.7 | 44 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 164.8 | 127.1 | 85.2 | 68.5 | 51.1 | 22.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 101.6 | 96.9 | 76.4 | 39.9 | 27.8 | 13.5 |
F1 23 (2023) | 120.1 | 126.7 | 106.1 | 32.7 | 13.1 | 6.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 87.3 | 74.5 | 64.9 | 59.1 | 39.9 | 18.5 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 75 | 68 | 63 | 46 | 37 | 23 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 280.6 | 158 | 93.4 | 46.7 | 45.9 | 32.1 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 46 | 44 | 36 | 30 | 20 | 9.5 |
配备 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的 Geekom XT12 Pro
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 177.3 | 173.2 | 164.2 | 98.5 | 89.8 | 103.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 304 | 208 | 150.6 | 72.9 | 62.5 | 71.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153.2 | 134.5 | 121.1 | 109.9 | 70.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 159.7 | 116.9 | 80.2 | 49.3 | 31.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 126.2 | 107.4 | 84.1 | 71.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 154 | 131 | 125 | 119 | 99 | 58 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 205 | 155.9 | 153 | 149.1 | 128.3 | 84.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 150.3 | 103.1 | 99.4 | 94 | 77.2 | 47.8 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 130 | 114 | 111 | 99 | 91 | 59 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 142.2 | 90.4 | 68.4 | 51.7 | 45.4 | 33.5 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 149.6 | 127 | 101.8 | 83.3 | 64.7 | 38.5 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 209 | 122.3 | 123.5 | 101.8 | 88.5 | 59.9 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 141.2 | 108.3 | 68.7 | 51.5 | 48.5 | 40.4 |
God of War (2022) | 109.9 | 96.4 | 81.2 | 62 | 55.8 | 39.7 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 115.6 | 98.6 | 82.3 | 70.4 | 63.7 | 50.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 171.2 | 136.3 | 101 | 79.7 | 60.9 | 34 |
F1 22 (2022) | 60 | 55.2 | 42.8 | 27.2 | 26.6 | 19.5 |
F1 23 (2023) | 66 | 64.2 | 53 | 33.5 | 31.2 | 13.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 83.8 | 78.9 | 70.1 | 63.3 | 44.5 | 22 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 86 | 82 | 77 | 62 | 52 | 37 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 303.7 | 170.9 | 101.8 | 76.5 | 62.2 | 38.9 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 63 | 62 | 62 | 50 | 43 | 31 |
排放 - 不太安静,但相当经济
噪音排放
遗憾的是,Geekom XT12 Pro 并不是最安静的设备之一。该设备只有在空转时才会发出很小的噪音,而且只能听到风扇发出的轻微噪音。但在负载情况下,这种情况就会发生变化,因为这款迷你电脑的噪音明显高达 44.2 dB(A)。在游戏过程中,我们甚至能测出高达 47.2 分贝(A)的噪音。不过,在游戏过程中,我们无法检测到持续的高声压级。结果在 39 到 47.2 dB(A) 之间波动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 28.1 / 28.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.6 / 44.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 2% | 0% | -8% | 0% | -14% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 24.8 2% | 30.2 -19% | 24.9 2% | 25.4 -0% | 25.2 1% | 25.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.5 -2% | 30.5 -9% | 25.4 9% | 33.3 -19% | 28.1 -0% | 34.4 -23% |
Idle Average * | 28.1 | 28.5 -1% | 30.5 -9% | 25.7 9% | 33.6 -20% | 28.2 -0% | 34.4 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 28.7 -1% | 30.5 -7% | 25.7 10% | 33.7 -18% | 28.3 1% | 34.5 -21% |
Load Average * | 39.6 | 32.4 18% | 30.5 23% | 47.8 -21% | 43.3 -9% | 42 -6% | 44.7 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.2 | 32.7 31% | 45.23 4% | 43.2 8% | 49 -4% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 39.6 10% | 30.5 31% | 49 -11% | 43.3 2% | 42.1 5% | 50.4 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Geekom XT12 Pro 在负载情况下发热明显。微型电脑顶部的发热明显高于底部。记录的温度都在合理范围内,无需担心。英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 本身就有些不同。不过,XT12 Pro 只在短时间内达到这些高值。在持续负载的情况下,SoC 的功耗降至 35 瓦,导致处理器的平均温度略高于 80 °C。这意味着,尽管由于散热装置较小,Turbo 利用率非常低,但 SoC 的运行仍符合英特尔的规格要求。
为了弄清温度过高的原因,我们在测试后拆卸了一次散热器,以排除导热膏的问题。实际上,我们并没有找到问题所在,即使是新的导热膏也无法确保在负载情况下降低热点温度。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 26 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
Geekom 本身将 XT12 Pro 描述为一款非常高效、经济的微型电脑。尽管闲置模式下的能耗与论文中的描述不尽相符,但我们在很大程度上同意这一说法。英特尔 NUC 13 也达到了几乎相同的数值。 英特尔 NUC 13在我们的测试中也达到了几乎相同的数值。另一方面,Geekom 显示,与 A7 相比,情况可能有所不同。 A7在这里。不过,在峰值时,我们只看到了 87.8 瓦的节制功率,这使得我们的测试样品相当经济。在平均负载情况下,能耗需求降至约 53 瓦,这也是一个不错的结果。电源由一个 120 瓦的小型电源装置提供。电源装置的功率有些过大,如果是 90 瓦的电源装置就足够了。
Off / Standby | 0.9 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 5.7 / 9.5 / 16.5 Watt |
Load |
53.3 / 87.8 Watt |
Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | -44% | -17% | 20% | 3% | 3% | 18% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.7 | 8.5 -49% | 12.1 -112% | 9.1 -60% | 3.8 33% | 7 -23% | 7.8 -37% | 5.34 ? 6% | 9.81 ? -72% |
Idle Average * | 9.5 | 10.5 -11% | 13 -37% | 10.3 -8% | 4.8 49% | 9.2 3% | 10.9 -15% | 8.53 ? 10% | 11.7 ? -23% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.5 | 12.9 22% | 18.2 -10% | 14.4 13% | 6.5 61% | 11.8 28% | 11.8 28% | 10.8 ? 35% | 14.8 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 53.3 | 67.2 -26% | 70.6 -32% | 54.9 -3% | 71.9 -35% | 45 16% | 39.2 26% | 45.2 ? 15% | 52.6 ? 1% |
Load Maximum * | 87.8 | 97.2 -11% | 113 -29% | 110.4 -26% | 94.7 -8% | 97.2 -11% | 76.4 13% | 67.3 ? 23% | 86.8 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumtion with the external monitor
Power consumtion with the external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论:价格高昂,但性能稳定
Geekom XT12 Pro 无疑是一款功能强大的迷你电脑。它搭载了 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H虽然它已不再是最新的 CPU,但在 CPU 性能方面仍可与更先进的竞争对手媲美。Geekom XT12 Pro 目前最大的劣势是 3D 性能。由于改进了 iGPU,基于 Meteor Lake 系列的新机型可以提供明显更好的性能。同样的情况也适用于 AMD 的 Radeon 780M.不依赖于此的用户很容易忽略这一点。Geekom 的做工非常出色。在选材方面也没有什么可抱怨的。
Geekom XT12 Pro 是一款功能强大的迷你电脑,其强大的功能给人留下了深刻的印象。不过,性价比并不是 Geekom XT12 Pro 的强项。
Geekom XT12 Pro 在外部接口的选择上尤其令人印象深刻。两个 USB4 接口比大多数竞争对手提供的都要多。毕竟,有了合适的配件,低 3D 性能就能得到明显提升。其余配置包括 32 GB DDR4 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,这些配置都很不错,很好地完善了整体方案。说到能效,可能会出现意见分歧,因为在我们的测试样本中,空闲模式下的能效值相对较高,这在一定程度上影响了整体效果。毕竟,制造商在这里宣传的是一款特别高效的设备。我们并不想完全否认 Geekom XT12 Pro 的这一点,因为在负载情况下,这台迷你电脑显示出了它的经济性。至于是有意为之,还是因为散热装置太小的缘故,我们暂且不论。
最后,我们再来看看购买价格:Geekom 为 XT12 Pro 报出的零售价为 899 欧元,但实际情况往往并非如此,因为总会有特价。这意味着,在我们的测试配置中,您目前需要支付 749 欧元购买 Geekom XT12 Pro。与其他迷你电脑相比,目前的购买价格相当高。同样的价格,你也可以买到搭载AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 的 Geekom A7,它的性能肯定比本次评测的 XT12 Pro 更好。这也是 Geekom 有点自不量力,让 XT12 Pro 失去吸引力的地方。因此,与 Geekom A7 相比,Geekom XT12 Pro 的价格应该便宜得多,这样才能引起人们的兴趣。
价格和供应情况
Geekom XT12 Pro 目前只有我们的测试配置,可从Geekom或亚马逊订购。售价为 749 欧元。目前使用代码 - Geekom-Shop 可享受 5% 的折扣: ntcpr5
亚马逊 ntcpr5XT12
Geekom XT12 Pro
-
04/25/2024 v7
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.