Notebookcheck

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 in review:这款笔记本电脑是否对得起它的名字?

它实际上快吗? 这款笔记本电脑的名字中包含的 "swift "一词表明这是一款强大的设备。阅读我们的评论,了解16.1英寸的宏碁Swift 3是否配备了相对很少使用的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H和其板载的Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs GPU,名符其实。
Marcus Schwarten, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Business Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Windows

宏碁提供不同版本的Swift 3。对于16.1英寸机型,我们有SF316-51-75MK旗舰机型供审查。它配备了Intel Core i7-11370H及其板载Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ,配以四通道模式的16GB LPDDR4x内存和512GB SSD。

宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK不仅要在我们的测试中证明其在各个类别的价值,而且还要面对竞争。我们的评论显示了该设备与配备相同CPU的小米RedmiBook Pro 15,或与配备较弱的Intel Tiger Lake i5-11300H 笔记本处理器 i5-11300H联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品,电池寿命良好的联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6相比较,这两款产品都配备了 MX450GeForce

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 (Swift 3 SF316 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 32 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H35
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - 1024 MB, Core: 1350 MHz, Memory: 1600 MHz
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR4x (quad-channel)
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, 512 GB 
, 420 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 367.8 x 236.1
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.674 kg, Power Supply: 271 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
10/2021
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg15.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.2 %
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
82.3 %
09/2021
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450
1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.1 %
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8 R4000
1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
04/2021
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6
1.7 kg18.4 mm16.10"1920x1080

大多数对比机型都配备了15.6英寸显示屏,比宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK的16.1英寸显示屏略小。尽管如此,由于显示器边框较窄,该设备除了几毫米之外几乎没有更大的尺寸。

我们的评测样本不需要不避讳面对华为MateBook D 16-53011VFJ联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 ,它们也都有16英寸显示屏。MateBook D 16的尺寸几乎相同,但它更厚一点,重量也相同,约为1.7公斤。IdeaPad 5更窄一些,但更长、更厚。因此,Swift 3给人留下了很好的印象,其紧凑的尺寸和令人愉快的轻量,甚至是15.6英寸的对比设备都无法超越。包括电源适配器在内,它的重量不到2公斤。

Size comparison

369 mm 234 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg367.8 mm 236.1 mm 15.9 mm 1.7 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 251 mm 18.4 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 229 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg

连接性。笔记本电脑有雷电4,但没有SD读卡器

所有的端口都分布在机箱的左侧和右侧。由于侧面的形状,这些端口都位于后部区域,朝前的部分比较窄。然而,它们之间有足够的空间,所以它们不会相互干扰。

有一个HDMI输出,以及一个通过USB Type-C提供的Thunderbolt 4端口,用于连接外部显示器。然而,没有网络连接。

左边:1个电源,1个USB 3.2 Type-C Gen 2(带Thunderbolt 4),1个HDMI,1个USB 3.2 Type-A
左边:1个电源,1个USB 3.2 Type-C Gen 2(带Thunderbolt 4),1个HDMI,1个USB 3.2 Type-A
右边:1个耳机/麦克风组合端口,1个USB 3.2 Type-A,1个Kensington
右边:1个耳机/麦克风组合端口,1个USB 3.2 Type-A,1个Kensington

沟通

内置的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201在测试中表现稳定,但在发送数据时仍低于平均水平。蓝牙5.1版可用于额外的无线连接。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% +21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=268)
1157 MBit/s ∼81% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1126 (552min - 1223max) MBit/s ∼79%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=78, last 2 years)
992 MBit/s ∼70% -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
884 (449min - 951max) MBit/s ∼62% -21%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (1233min - 1359max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=268)
1247 MBit/s ∼93% -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1192 (1109min - 1450max) MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1548, n=78, last 2 years)
1072 MBit/s ∼80% -18%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501341132513231335132112991315134713201327130713391265133513161321130413041282131012721344135113521359132913021288125412336509131015104712851351139314781367135312551445140913691400145713801363122115551533141415731500141713161550144313311496134513461342134413571353135013251316132213271351134213521351135213641351135113571339133513331334132312891334132213531311122612411199123911971204115511911169113311441167110912031450142613701213111611121165116211491167117011271145112111261161134113251323133513211299131513471320132713071339126513351316132113041304128213101272134413511352135913291302128812541233650913101510471285135113931478136713531255144514091369140014571380136312211555153314141573150014171316155014431331149613451346134213441357135313501325131613221327135113421352135113521364135113511357133913351333133413231289133413221353131112261241119912391197120411551191116911331144116711091203145014261370121311161112116511621149116711701127114511211126116155210201074116011011178111411121156112211761111884102311161149113911551187112312111168121511661096119112231127104011556861465140414381449143614731444141614941385147614261454147814081498147414651453111614091448147512481284142314161410146114651443143914351440147914641455147614051389141813331328960126613241349126913311195136713621354138814161376143813641296449889899895928904886909921913855951791908894921831917898716874895909916794864895834904918Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1314 (1233-1359)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (650-1573)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1289-1364)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1192 (1109-1450)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1108 (552-1223)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (686-1498)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (960-1479)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (449-951)

网络摄像头

由于平均DeltaE为10.6,720p网络摄像头在色彩再现方面表现得很好。对于视频通话等来说,这绝对是足够的。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
18 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
0 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift 3 SF316-51: 10.62 ∆E min: 0 - max: 18.43 ∆E

安全问题

在设备的右侧集成了一个用于Kensington锁的插槽。没有额外的安全功能。

辅料

盒子里只包括大小适中的65瓦充电器。更多的配件没有包括在内,但它们可以直接从制造商那里购买,形式包括通用的外壳、适配器等等。

维护

进入内部的通道被12颗小的Torx螺丝挡住了。清洁两个风扇,安装不同的固态硬盘,或更换电池,都可以轻松完成。

担保

宏碁在德国为Swift笔记本电脑提供通常的24个月制造商保修,并提供送检和退货服务。可以选择购买第三年的服务延期,以换取50至150欧元(约58至约173美元)。

输入设备。宏碁Swift 3很适合在上面打字

键盘

除了具有坚实的按键尺寸的键盘外,宏碁还在16.1英寸的机箱中集成了一个极其紧凑的数字键盘。除了左右两边2厘米宽的边框外,制造商利用了设备的整个宽度。

打字体验很好,噪音发展也很适中。这使得它很容易快速打字,特别是由于背光的作用,即使在黑暗中按键也非常清晰。

指纹传感器的位置有点缺乏新意;它位于键盘下方的中心位置,在掌托的上边缘。拇指很难触及,但可以用中指舒适地使用它。

触摸板

触摸板略微偏向机箱左侧,位于空格键下方。它非常大,约12.5 x 8厘米。在触觉和功能方面没有任何抱怨。我们唯一可以批评的是两个 "鼠标按钮 "的点击噪音,它们没有显示出明显的分离,因为它们可以更安静一点,听起来更高质量。

斯威夫特3的显示屏是对比笔记本电脑中最好的。

几乎没有屏幕渗漏。
几乎没有屏幕渗漏。

宏碁在Swift 3 SF316-51-75MK中安装了一块带有LED背光的16.1英寸磨砂IPS面板。我们审查样本中的面板来自奇美。分辨率为1920x1080像素,相当于全高清。在这种尺寸下,更高的分辨率将是可取的,因为图像有时看起来略微有些冲淡。这就是说,全高清是这个价格范围内的通常标准。

在其他方面,与所选择的竞争者进行直接比较时,该显示器有许多加分项。它在许多方面都超过了竞争对手。只有当它的亮度略低于300cd/m²和它的响应时间时,它才不得不让位于一些竞争对手。作为回报,它几乎没有屏幕出血现象。

302
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN160B
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 304 cd/m² Average: 283.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1842:1 (Black: 0.165 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.44 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.54% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.60
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Display
-1%
-40%
6%
-34%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
66.63
66.73
0%
39.92
-40%
74
11%
43.6
-35%
66.77
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.54
96.27
-3%
58.83
-41%
98.7
-1%
65.2
-34%
98.99
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.53
68.5
0%
41.24
-40%
74.5
9%
45
-34%
68.98
1%
Response Times
-15%
-48%
60%
25%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32 ?(15, 17)
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
-9%
41 ?(21, 20)
-28%
13 ?(6, 7)
59%
18 ?(8, 10)
44%
25 ?(16, 9)
22%
Response Time Black / White *
20 ?(11, 9)
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
-20%
31 ?(17, 14)
-55%
8 ?(4, 4)
60%
19 ?(10, 9)
5%
22 ?(12, 10)
-10%
PWM Frequency
2500 ?(10)
1000 ?(90)
-60%
2500 ?(30)
0%
Screen
-60%
-55%
-21%
-69%
-2%
Brightness middle
304
312
3%
286
-6%
356
17%
289
-5%
352
16%
Brightness
284
298
5%
268
-6%
322
13%
267
-6%
330
16%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
87
-1%
80
-9%
85
-3%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.165
0.18
-9%
0.275
-67%
0.27
-64%
0.56
-239%
0.28
-70%
Contrast
1842
1733
-6%
1040
-44%
1319
-28%
516
-72%
1257
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.44
5.39
-274%
4.74
-229%
2.4
-67%
3.96
-175%
1.35
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.62
9.95
-175%
8.27
-128%
4.42
-22%
6.76
-87%
2.58
29%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
6.3
-142%
1.57
40%
2.81
-8%
3.43
-32%
2.02
22%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.192 100%
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
2.28 96%
2.49 88%
CCT
6527 100%
7473 87%
6348 102%
6294 103%
7191 90%
6445 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.5
69
1%
42
-39%
63
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
96
-4%
65
-35%
99
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.15
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-25% / -42%
-48% / -50%
15% / -2%
-26% / -50%
1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

该显示器几乎完全覆盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间,达到99.5%。较大的AdobeRGB仍然覆盖了近69%。然而,这对于专业图形编辑来说是不够的。但是,宏碁Swift 3并不是针对这个目标群体的。

在DeltaE、对比度和黑度方面,我们的评测样本在某些情况下明显超过了一些竞争对手。总的来说,该设备配备了一个良好的显示屏,但我们希望它能更亮一些。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度

这将使该设备更适合于户外使用。然而,只要阳光不完全照射到显示屏上,宏碁Swift 3也可以在户外很好地使用,其亮度略低于260 cd/m²,特别是由于采用了磨砂显示屏。此外,图像的视角非常稳定,虽然所有的IPS面板都是如此,但也是如此。

在户外也有坚实的能见度
在户外也有坚实的能见度
视角稳定的IPS面板
视角稳定的IPS面板

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2500 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

性能。快速的四核CPU,集成GPU

这款型号为SF316-51-75MK的宏碁Swift 3配备了强大的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H及其集成英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 。此外,制造商还为其配备了四通道模式的16GB LPDDR4x内存,以及通过PCI Express连接的512GB SSD。

除了型号为SF316-51-75MK(NX.ABDEV.007)的配置外,宏碁还提供配有Intel Core i5-11300H和8 GB LPDDR4x内存的SF316-51-54R8(NX.ABDEG.002)的Swift 3。这个功能较弱的版本的建议零售价为899欧元(约合1,039美元),比我们测试机型的价格低100欧元(约合116美元)。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

处理器

内置的英特尔酷睿i7-11370H是来自英特尔目前的Tiger Lake 系列,今年才推出。目前,它只能在相对较少的设备中找到,如RedmiBook Pro 15比较模型。该CPU与更普遍的英特尔酷睿i7-1185G7 ,但它允许制造商将TDP设定在28至35瓦之间。在这种情况下,宏碁选择了35瓦,从而充分利用了该CPU的性能。在Boost模式下,四核处理器的运行速度高达4.8GHz,而基本时钟速度为3.3GHz。

由于高TDP配置,英特尔酷睿i7-11370H在基准测试中表现积极,在Cinebench的单核得分中处于领先地位。像往常一样,它不得不在多核测试中让位于基于AMD最新Ryzen CPU的竞争者。

在短暂的初始下降之后,该处理器在耐久性测试中表现稳定,与配备相同CPU(PL1可变)的小米红米书Pro 15的水平相当。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

08016024032040048056064072080088096010401120120012801360144015201017.58953.9918.97921.77920.96923.62921.3920.96922.3921.96920.3923.3920.3918.65921.96924.62924.62917.66920.62917.33922.96917.66917.35914.45917.851048.55809.65765.3910.77997.71992.51966.25936.24935.61933.75925.84955.11921.09919.79929.56931.53928.14945.54908.37936.79892.14944.06908.86927.84916.72959.72781.19788.08787.03783.61784.54785.48786.61785.28786.98787.39785.22783.28785.31787.42783.65787.14785.45781.11782.52782.76785.82784.42783.99786.86917.33840.46843.4848.75851.77855.41843.92839.6838.79836.45847.31840.3849843.94842.39845.45845.06850.23852.37852.44846.42842845.02850.67852.9777.54696.05618.63620.5619.29618.94623.71622.69621.78588.39624.09622.76623.41621.18620.37620.08623.98621.93621.91620.49617.61621.17623.52619.05620.51623.2619.55620.05622.54620.77623.16622.75626.59623.9624.86621.1616.51621.49622.64616.56990.11983.55971.56953.22946.07948.7952.47950.59956.41953.33955.98921.15950.95951.93950.55955.22951.86952.02950.1957.72950.91953.49954.56956.48954.52956.32953.95956.69955.34954.2951.04952.36949.92950.43952.06955.77954.81951.86955.27954.541534.271485.551501.451506.881508.641507.841517.571501.221465.261466.381472.161475.521469.2414801474.931476.011468.71475.741430.261408.31402.571391.691394.851402.921391.691388.61389.081391.741390.051394.851395.141392.081391.791391.741392.081402.031392.611391.931387.541390.191401.31390.921388.941389.91386.11388.171384.181383.841385.091388.021391.41385.521378.451377.081371.741364.951364.861367.711364.821367.291367.81367.611362.031367.521362.95Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø626 (588.39-777.54)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1437 (1387.54-1534.27)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1378 (1362.03-1401.3)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1556 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1507 - 1556, n=4)
1528 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points ∼92% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1367 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1556, n=47, last 2 years)
1327 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1264 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1134 Points ∼73% -27%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
9051 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
7713 Points ∼85% +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2725 - 13205, n=53, last 2 years)
6600 Points ∼73% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points ∼71% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6182 Points ∼68%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5344 - 6612, n=5)
5913 Points ∼65% -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points ∼62% -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points ∼59% -14%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4914 Points ∼54% -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
601 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (519 - 601, n=4)
575 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
526 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
490 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 601, n=92, last 2 years)
485 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
454 Points ∼76% -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3536 Points ∼100% +54%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3219 Points ∼91% +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points ∼67% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (2152 - 2578, n=4)
2307 Points ∼65% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
2299 Points ∼65%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=92, last 2 years)
2287 Points ∼65% -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points ∼61% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1914 Points ∼54% -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points ∼99% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (231 - 233, n=5)
232 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 240, n=90, last 2 years)
191 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
188 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼76% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points ∼76% -24%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
139 Points ∼60% -40%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1535 Points ∼100% +51%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1401 (1362.03min - 1401.3max) Points ∼91% +38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points ∼68% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points ∼60% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1018 (914.45min - 1017.58max) Points ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (917 - 1086, n=6)
1014 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=103, last 2 years)
1010 Points ∼66% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points ∼64% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
778 Points ∼51% -24%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
653.5 Seconds * ∼100% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (233 - 1439, n=79, last 2 years)
550 Seconds * ∼84% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * ∼83% -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * ∼82% -6%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
507 Seconds * ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (461 - 538, n=4)
493 Seconds * ∼75% +3%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
349 Seconds * ∼53% +31%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
323 Seconds * ∼49% +36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
5393 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5128 - 5411, n=4)
5321 MIPS ∼98% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS ∼91% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4937 MIPS ∼91% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5777, n=78, last 2 years)
4926 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4588 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4428 MIPS ∼82% -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
42760 MIPS ∼100% +58%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37660 MIPS ∼88% +39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=78, last 2 years)
28422 MIPS ∼66% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
27015 MIPS ∼63%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (25382 - 28520, n=4)
26927 MIPS ∼63% 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS ∼59% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS ∼59% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
20562 MIPS ∼48% -24%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1607 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=4)
1536 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points ∼90% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1342 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1645, n=75, last 2 years)
1311 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1191 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1118 Points ∼70% -30%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6254 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6115 Points ∼98%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5963 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4733 - 6115, n=4)
5512 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 9050, n=75, last 2 years)
5258 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points ∼83% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points ∼78% -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
3631 Points ∼58% -41%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
10.6 fps ∼100% +38%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.8 fps ∼92% +27%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (6.91 - 8.51, n=4)
7.82 fps ∼74% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.7 fps ∼73%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=76, last 2 years)
7.62 fps ∼72% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps ∼67% -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps ∼65% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
5.67 fps ∼53% -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
59.5 s * ∼100% -45%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
57.2 s * ∼96% -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.5 - 99.2, n=78, last 2 years)
54.8 s * ∼92% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * ∼88% -27%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * ∼79% -15%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (41.1 - 56.5, n=4)
47.2 s * ∼79% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
47 s * ∼79% -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
41.1 s * ∼69%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4998 - 1.002, n=78, last 2 years)
0.629 sec * ∼100% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.627 sec * ∼100% -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.607 sec * ∼97% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * ∼96% -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.585 sec * ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.548 - 0.562, n=4)
0.553 sec * ∼88% -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * ∼88% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.548 sec * ∼87%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1018 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
106 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
232 Points
Help

系统性能

在实际测试中,即使在重载情况下,系统也能愉快地平稳运行。各种PCMark 10基准测试显示了良好的性能,其中宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51通常被定位在顶部,与RedmiBook Pro 15直接竞争。配备酷睿i5-11300H和类似CPU的对手一般没有机会接近这一性能水平。

PCMark 10 / Score
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5459 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5419 - 5459, n=2)
5439 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5402 Points ∼96% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5110 Points ∼91% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4899 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6725, n=84, last 2 years)
4877 Points ∼87% -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10241 - 10531, n=2)
10386 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
10241 Points ∼99%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9270 Points ∼89% -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9123 Points ∼88% -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=83, last 2 years)
9039 Points ∼87% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points ∼82% -16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8366 Points ∼81% -18%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points ∼100% +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points ∼89% +16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8292 Points ∼86% +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8111 Points ∼84% +10%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7517 Points ∼78% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7388 Points ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=83, last 2 years)
7326 Points ∼76% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (7082 - 7388, n=2)
7235 Points ∼75% -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5838 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5790 - 5838, n=2)
5814 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5691 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5283 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=83, last 2 years)
4870 Points ∼83% -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4600 Points ∼78% -21%
PCMark 8 / Storage Score v2
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5074 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
4929 Points ∼97% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
4919 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
4919 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1818 - 5039, n=4, last 2 years)
4176 Points ∼82% -15%
PCMark 8 / Work Score Accelerated v2
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5603 Points ∼100% +73%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5424 Points ∼97% +68%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5317 Points ∼95% +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2594 - 5681, n=53, last 2 years)
4631 Points ∼83% +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4067 Points ∼73% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
3234 Points ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
3234 Points ∼58% 0%
PCMark 8 / Creative Score Accelerated v2
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
7983 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7666 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
7666 Points ∼96% 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6183 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3604 - 7983, n=23, last 2 years)
5296 Points ∼66% -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4971 Points ∼62% -35%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
4703 Points ∼59% -39%
PCMark 8 / Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5575 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
5575 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
4944 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4652 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
4376 Points ∼78% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4078 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2742 - 5575, n=54, last 2 years)
3935 Points ∼71% -29%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5575 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7666 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3234 points
PCMark 10 Score
5459 points
Help

DPC延迟

Swift 3在我们的延迟测试中表现非常好,这是每个被评测的笔记本电脑都必须面对的任务。在所有提到的对比型号中,它的延迟是最低的。因此,在这方面,实时音频和视频编辑的问题应该不会出现,尽管这始终只是一个瞬间的快照。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5116.7 μs * ∼100% -1075%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1945.3 μs * ∼38% -347%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
721.8 μs * ∼14% -66%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
628.7 μs * ∼12% -44%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
586.8 μs * ∼11% -35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
435.4 μs * ∼9%

* ... smaller is better

储存

称512GB固态硬盘为阿基里斯之踵可能有点夸张。但总的来说,大多数其他比较设备在各种读取和写入基准测试中显示出更好的结果。因此,在长期读取测试中,它在其他类别中排在最后。

然而,由于默认情况下SSD的速度相当快,通常不再像当时的HDD那样成为PC系统中的大瓶颈,所以最终这只是一个题外话,因为在日常工作中没有明显的问题。毕竟,该设备仍然能够领先于配备相同SSD的设备的平均值。

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
13%
48%
10%
46%
-10%
Write 4K
171.8
136
-21%
207.3
21%
203
18%
116.8
-32%
147
-14%
122 ?(94.8 - 172, n=3)
-29%
Read 4K
79.43
60.41
-24%
61.27
-23%
52.35
-34%
43.92
-45%
65.47
-18%
60.3 ?(48.9 - 79.4, n=3)
-24%
Write Seq
1099
1447
32%
1499
36%
2138
95%
1990
81%
2680
144%
1102 ?(1059 - 1149, n=3)
0%
Read Seq
1847
1507
-18%
1858
1%
1974
7%
1959
6%
2556
38%
1780 ?(1620 - 1872, n=3)
-4%
Write 4K Q32T1
539.3
235.6
-56%
510.2
-5%
640.2
19%
373.3
-31%
413.4
-23%
437 ?(371 - 539, n=3)
-19%
Read 4K Q32T1
555
737.4
33%
639.6
15%
706.9
27%
523.9
-6%
500
-10%
480 ?(377 - 555, n=3)
-14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1095
1529
40%
1521
39%
2973
172%
1985
81%
2978
172%
1128 ?(1095 - 1154, n=3)
3%
Read Seq Q32T1
1988
2357
19%
2316
16%
3559
79%
2456
24%
3567
79%
2103 ?(1988 - 2248, n=3)
6%
AS SSD
-100%
-36%
56%
15%
39%
-11%
Seq Read
2015.22
1972.39
-2%
2085.97
4%
2540.6
26%
2082.32
3%
2829.45
40%
1937 ?(1784 - 2015, n=3)
-4%
Seq Write
1054.87
980.6
-7%
1124.41
7%
2554.63
142%
1843.62
75%
2422.71
130%
959 ?(742 - 1080, n=3)
-9%
4K Read
73.89
55.85
-24%
54.09
-27%
56.05
-24%
44.33
-40%
42.06
-43%
62.5 ?(55.2 - 73.9, n=3)
-15%
4K Write
223.24
133.53
-40%
138.15
-38%
129.6
-42%
157.46
-29%
126.1
-44%
164 ?(127 - 223, n=3)
-27%
4K-64 Read
589.37
1277.06
117%
1294.82
120%
1633.45
177%
1039.02
76%
1481.11
151%
587 ?(582 - 589, n=3)
0%
4K-64 Write
1029.11
313.94
-69%
749.96
-27%
1862.62
81%
1555.75
51%
2008.92
95%
1017 ?(976 - 1047, n=3)
-1%
Access Time Read *
0.056
0.15
-168%
0.141
-152%
0.077
-38%
0.05
11%
0.079
-41%
0.075 ?(0.052 - 0.117, n=3)
-34%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.513
-1215%
0.169
-333%
0.029
26%
0.065
-67%
0.029
26%
0.046 ?(0.039 - 0.053, n=3)
-18%
Score Read
865
1530
77%
1558
80%
1944
125%
1292
49%
1806
109%
843 ?(819 - 865, n=3)
-3%
Score Write
1358
546
-60%
1001
-26%
2248
66%
1898
40%
2377
75%
1277 ?(1211 - 1358, n=3)
-6%
Score Total
2644
2819
7%
3316
25%
5192
96%
3845
45%
5087
92%
2524 ?(2460 - 2644, n=3)
-5%
Copy ISO MB/s
1186.15
1104.62
-7%
678.04
-43%
2246.35
89%
1440.7
21%
1358.46
15%
1078 ?(982 - 1186, n=3)
-9%
Copy Program MB/s
782.2
799.12
2%
364.81
-53%
861.01
10%
484.92
-38%
407.08
-48%
649 ?(566 - 782, n=3)
-17%
Copy Game MB/s
1028.44
956.64
-7%
556.58
-46%
1551.58
51%
1098.19
7%
917.71
-11%
962 ?(838 - 1028, n=3)
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-50% / -63%
-12% / -19%
52% / 53%
13% / 13%
43% / 42%
-11% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1988 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 555 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 539.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1847 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1099 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 79.43 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 171.8 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420905.84983.98984.19984.19984.32984.61984.74984.74984.82984.95985.03985.16985.37985.79986.08986.08986.29986.29986.5986.5986.71986.71986.71986.92987.04987.13987.25987.46987.46987.55987.88987.88988.09988.3988.3989.02989.02989.02989.23989.23989.23989.44989.44989.65989.86989.86990.07990.28990.28990.481255.361255.781255.781255.781255.781255.981255.991255.991256.21256.21256.21256.21256.411256.411256.411256.411256.411256.411256.411256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.621256.831256.831256.831257.041360.431373.41489.981490.611491.031491.241491.281491.451491.871830.512203.062396.242396.632433.72434.332435.381215.511216.261217.611219.281220.751220.961222.641223.271223.91225.161225.791226.561226.831227.251228.361229.621230.611232.711232.711232.921234.011235.221235.641235.851236.321236.691236.91236.941237.321237.531237.741237.781238.541238.581239.661284.031327.51358.541379.721449.381574.331675.842136.452149.792339.792346.292364.752368.312385.32391.633085.873371.593381.193381.193381.663382.023382.023382.233382.233382.233382.53382.923383.073383.553384.123384.333384.543384.543384.743385.373385.373385.583385.793386.213386.213386.423386.423386.843386.963387.673388.093388.433388.723388.723389.423389.983390.193390.193391.863392.913393.953394.163394.583394.7933953395.213396.883398.983399.813401.72316.742438.152449.052450.12450.312450.942452.22453.882454.722455.352460.382461.012461.642461.852462.062462.272462.482462.692463.112463.112463.312463.312463.312463.312463.942463.942464.152464.572464.572464.782464.992464.9924652465.22465.22465.22465.22465.412465.622465.832466.042466.252466.462466.882466.882467.092467.512467.932468.982469.193391.723534.753535.593536.223536.433536.433536.643536.643536.853537.063537.483537.483537.693538.113538.523538.523538.523538.733538.943538.943539.153539.153539.363539.573539.573539.573539.783539.783539.993539.993540.23540.413540.413540.413540.833541.043541.043541.043541.253541.883541.883542.093542.33542.423542.513542.933543.563545.453545.863547.12Tooltip
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD: Ø986 (905.84-990.48)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G: Ø1440 (1255.36-2435.38)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø1432 (1215.51-2391.63)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø3382 (3085.87-3401.7)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00: Ø2459 (2316.74-2469.19)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø3537 (3391.72-3547.12)

图形卡

宏碁没有在Swift 3中实施一个专门的图形解决方案。相反,它依靠处理器的能力Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsGPU。配有1GB内存的图形引擎的基本时钟速度为400MHz。当它处于负载状态时,它在Boost模式下可以运行到1350MHz。

没有独立显卡的一个好处是,该设备消耗的能量较少,我们将在下面看到更多细节。尽管如此,该GPU为许多应用目的提供了足够的性能。毕竟,众所周知,它在许多方面与GeForce MX350笔记本电脑相当,在某些情况下,它甚至可以跟上GeForce MX450

该设备在电池供电的情况下,在3DMark 11中取得了6436分的成绩。这意味着不连接电源适配器时的可用性能只比使用外部电源时低5%左右。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points ∼100% +39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 31866, n=82, last 2 years)
9488 Points ∼99% +37%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
8517 Points ∼89% +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points ∼83% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6904 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4841 - 7090, n=64)
6432 Points ∼67% -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
5667 Points ∼59% -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4505 Points ∼47% -35%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=67, last 2 years)
33605 Points ∼99% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
33402 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
27524 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (19487 - 38040, n=55)
27301 Points ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
25467 Points ∼75% -24%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
23044 Points ∼68% -31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 23674, n=90, last 2 years)
6783 Points ∼100% +18%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5771 Points ∼85%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points ∼82% -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (3113 - 5909, n=70)
4930 Points ∼73% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
4766 Points ∼70% -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points ∼65% -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3430 Points ∼51% -41%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
2985 Points ∼44% -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=79, last 2 years)
2396 Points ∼100% +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points ∼96% +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
1896 Points ∼79% +10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1717 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (994 - 1819, n=69)
1461 Points ∼61% -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1040 Points ∼43% -39%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
914 Points ∼38% -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
7431 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22314 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5300 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1917 points
Help

游戏性能

眼前的宏碁Swift 3绝对不是一款游戏设备,仅从缺乏专用的图形解决方案就可以看出这一点。尽管如此,它在基准测试中的表现还是绰绰有余的,尤其是在涉及到老游戏的时候。例如, Witcher 3 ,在中等图形设置下可以没有问题,甚至在高图形设置下也有轻微的限制。

总的来说,该设备在测试领域排名居中--尽管大多数其他对比机型都配备了专用GPU。例如,戴尔Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR,配备了NvidiaGeForce MX450落后。此外,Swift 3的性能总是远远高于平均Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsGPU。

CPU的集成显卡显示它们有相当大的能力,所以偶尔的游戏环节对评测样本来说应该不是问题。当然,前提是用户对性能和图形的期望值不要太高。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
136 (12.2min, 38.3P0.1, 86.7P1 - 283max) fps ∼100% +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16 - 342, n=63, last 2 years)
135 fps ∼99% +34%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
101 fps ∼74%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
99.3 (8.73min, 25.8P0.1, 56.6P1 - 209max) fps ∼73% -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (32.5 - 107, n=61)
83.2 fps ∼61% -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
54 (32.2min, 32.6P0.1, 38P1 - 130max) fps ∼40% -47%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
50.8 fps ∼37% -50%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.5 - 243, n=63, last 2 years)
83.5 fps ∼100% +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
81.4 (34.1min, 42.6P0.1, 59.5P1 - 198max) fps ∼97% +30%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.6 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
58 fps ∼69% -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.8 (27.2min, 33.7P0.1, 39.8P1 - 118max) fps ∼69% -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (21.4 - 67, n=61)
53.1 fps ∼64% -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
38.5 (24.8min, 25.3P0.1, 26.8P1 - 66max) fps ∼46% -38%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
33.2 fps ∼40% -47%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.9 - 170, n=69, last 2 years)
52 fps ∼100% +56%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps ∼82% +29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34 fps ∼65% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.3 fps ∼64%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
30.7 (14.9min, 14.9P0.1, 15.6P1 - 188max) fps ∼59% -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10.6 - 45.9, n=61)
28.5 fps ∼55% -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
19.6 (15min, 15.3P0.1, 16.1P1 - 25.5max) fps ∼38% -41%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19.4 fps ∼37% -42%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.9 - 92.1, n=73, last 2 years)
30.7 fps ∼100% +81%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
24.3 (12.1min, 14.5P0.1, 19.1P1 - 111max) fps ∼79% +43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
20 (15min) fps ∼65% +18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
17.7 (12.4min, 12.7P0.1, 13.9P1 - 20.8max) fps ∼58% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17 fps ∼55%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10.3 - 20.1, n=54)
14.4 fps ∼47% -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
13.4 (8.64min, 9.14P0.1, 10.9P1 - 16.2max) fps ∼44% -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
11.2 fps ∼36% -34%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
139 (124.5min) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
136 (121min) fps ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
123 (110.1min) fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (51.4 - 180, n=82, last 2 years)
119 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
104 (93.3min) fps ∼75% -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (92.4min) fps ∼75% -25%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
97 (84.9min) fps ∼70% -30%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (36 - 148, n=69)
85 fps ∼61% -39%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
119 (103min) fps ∼100% +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
112 (100.6min) fps ∼94% +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (33.3 - 167, n=82, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼87% +18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
90.5 (80.6min) fps ∼76% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
87.1 (70.8min) fps ∼73%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
84.3 (76.7min) fps ∼71% -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
75.8 (64.7min) fps ∼64% -13%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (31.6 - 107, n=69)
66.7 fps ∼56% -23%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (91.9min) fps ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
86 (74.6min) fps ∼83% +46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.8 - 152, n=82, last 2 years)
84.4 fps ∼81% +43%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
80.7 (71min) fps ∼78% +37%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59 (51.1min) fps ∼57%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
48.9 (44.4min) fps ∼47% -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
48.8 (44min) fps ∼47% -17%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (31.3 - 88.1, n=69)
46.9 fps ∼45% -21%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.4 (72.2min) fps ∼83% +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.4 - 144, n=82, last 2 years)
78.1 fps ∼82% +40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
75.3 (66.7min) fps ∼79% +35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
55.6 (48.8min) fps ∼58%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
45.6 (41min) fps ∼48% -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.3 (41.6min) fps ∼47% -19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (29.7 - 78.5, n=69)
43.9 fps ∼46% -21%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.4 - 163, n=5, last 2 years)
111 fps ∼100% +37%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
81.1 fps ∼73%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (67.2 - 85.5, n=4)
77.7 fps ∼70% -4%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Average of class Multimedia
  (42.8 - 107, n=5, last 2 years)
77.3 fps ∼100% +58%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
49 fps ∼63%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (43 - 49, n=4)
45.8 fps ∼59% -7%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Average of class Multimedia
  (21.2 - 60.5, n=5, last 2 years)
45.2 fps ∼100% +60%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.2 fps ∼62%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (24 - 28.2, n=4)
26.2 fps ∼58% -7%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 49.1, n=5, last 2 years)
37 fps ∼100% +63%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22.7 fps ∼61%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (16.4 - 22.7, n=4)
20.3 fps ∼55% -11%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
88.3 fps ∼100% +90%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.6 fps ∼90% +72%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.6 - 130, n=74, last 2 years)
71.2 fps ∼81% +53%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.8 fps ∼78% +48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.4 fps ∼53%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
43.8 fps ∼50% -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
42.2 fps ∼48% -9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (15.8 - 88.4, n=72)
37.4 fps ∼42% -19%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
73.4 fps ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
64.9 fps ∼88% +70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.75 - 108, n=74, last 2 years)
59.6 fps ∼81% +56%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
53.7 fps ∼73% +41%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.2 fps ∼52%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (17.9 - 69.5, n=73)
34.8 fps ∼47% -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
32.4 fps ∼44% -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.3 fps ∼44% -15%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 fps ∼92% +62%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.55 - 87.6, n=74, last 2 years)
51.4 fps ∼82% +44%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
47 fps ∼75% +32%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35.7 fps ∼57%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (17.3 - 59.8, n=73)
31 fps ∼50% -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
28.9 fps ∼46% -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.8 fps ∼46% -19%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.9 - 67.3, n=13, last 2 years)
50.5 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
41.5 fps ∼82%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (12.1 - 38.4, n=7)
19.3 fps ∼38%
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Multimedia
  (61.4 - 375, n=22, last 2 years)