Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar威刚XPG Xenia 14笔记本电脑评测。一个新的14英寸的最爱
在推出坚实的15.6英寸 XPG Xenia Xe 就在几个月前，威刚将很快推出一款名为XPG Xenia 14的14英寸产品。这款较小的机型采用了与它较大的兄弟非常不同的机箱设计，这使得该系统不仅仅是Xenia Xe的 "迷你版"。例如，它的显示屏长宽比是16:10，而不是16:9。尽管如此，两款机型有许多相似之处，包括第11代英特尔Tiger Lake-U Core i7-1165G7 CPU。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他轻薄型14英寸笔记本电脑，如 LG Gram 14, Honor MagicBook 14, MSI Prestige 14，甚至是优雅的 Vaio Z.
威刚计划捆绑礼品，包括耳机、鼠标垫和背包，为早期采用者提供优惠。Core i5和i7 SKU的促销价格分别为1049美元至1149美元。
Xenia 14与Schenker Vision 14共享相同的机箱。 申科视界14在欧盟地区有售。威刚笔记本电脑是基于与Schenker类似的白标设计。
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 (XPG Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 93 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 27.20.100.9415
Memory
32 GB
, 1600 MHz, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, BOE NE140WUM-N63, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB, 512 GB
Weight
996 g, Power Supply: 282 g
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.6 % | 08/2021 | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 996 g | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 82.5 % | 01/2021 | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.4 % | 09/2021 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.9 % | 05/2021 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.3 % | 06/2021 | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 967 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 83.8 % | 03/2021 | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L i7-11375H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 |
外壳 - 令人难以置信的轻盈
为了达到996克的低重量，底盘骨架必须做得比更大更重的车型更薄。 Xenia Xe.为了减轻重量，某些功能如边缘到边缘的玻璃保护被排除在外。因此，该系统比其他大多数超极本更容易受到弯曲和扭曲，包括 惠普Spectre x360 14或华硕ZenBook。这并不是说该系统建造得不好，因为建造质量仍然是一流的，但用户将为增加便携性而牺牲刚性。
连接性 - 有很多选择
该系统集成了比其他大多数14英寸笔记本电脑更多的端口。两个USB-C端口都支持充电、数据和视频输出，但只有右边的端口实际上支持雷电4。制造商可以完全放弃专有的桶形充电器端口，而不会真正影响到该机型的可用性。
SD卡阅读器
将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约14秒。请注意，由于SD读卡器没有弹簧加载，插入的SD卡仍然突出一半以上的长度。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
沟通
ADATA XPG Xenia 14; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1484 (1395-1530)
ADATA XPG Xenia 14; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1568 (1421-1684)
网络摄像头
8.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
维护
底部面板只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀就可以轻松拆卸，用于简单的内存和存储升级。注意主板上的空位，用于放置潜在的独立GPU及其VRAM模块，以及靠近前角的空的M.2 2280插槽用于扩展。
配件和保修
盒子里有一套威刚标志的小贴纸。标准的一年有限保修期适用。
输入设备--可以更坚固一些
键盘
按键反馈均匀，但与惠普Spectre或联想ThinkPad的较坚硬的按键相比，偏软和偏浅。
触摸板
玻璃点击板比较大，为13.2 x 8.2厘米。即使在较慢的速度下移动，也很少有粘连。不幸的是，点击其表面时的反馈是令人不满意的浅薄和薄弱。
显示屏 - 校准得非常好
Xenia 14上的京东方NE140WUM IPS面板是第一个出现在我们数据库中的。它的属性是高端面板的代表，包括其高对比度和宽广的色域，其亮度水平是其他中高档超极本的典型。它最大的缺点可能是黑白和灰白的响应时间较慢，这使得内部显示器不适合许多游戏。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE140WUM-N63 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 344.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 321.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 344.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1566:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.52
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 BOE NE140WUM-N63, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200 | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D), IPS-Level, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G LG Display LP140WU1-SPA1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200 | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L BOE NE140QUM-N62, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -10% | -6% | 19% | 19% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70 | 68.8 -2% | 65.7 -6% | 64.8 -7% | 97.6 39% | 95.7 37% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 99.4 0% | 86.6 -13% | 96.3 -3% | 99.9 1% | 99.5 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72 | 70.9 -2% | 63.3 -12% | 66.1 -8% | 85.3 18% | 86.4 20% |
| Response Times | -14% | 5% | 38% | 17% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 59.6 ? -19% | 43.2 ? 14% | 31.2 ? 38% | 45 ? 10% | 46.8 ? 6% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 32.8 ? -8% | 32 ? -5% | 19.2 ? 37% | 23 ? 24% | 28 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
| Screen | -38% | -183% | -28% | -86% | -58% | |
| Brightness middle | 344.6 | 293 -15% | 282 -18% | 341 -1% | 352 2% | 368.3 7% |
| Brightness | 321 | 277 -14% | 271 -16% | 313 -2% | 332 3% | 361 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 74 -17% | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.18 18% | 0.24 -9% | 0.27 -23% | 0.22 -0% | 0.22 -0% |
| Contrast | 1566 | 1628 4% | 1175 -25% | 1263 -19% | 1600 2% | 1674 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.51 | 2.95 -95% | 6.1 -304% | 1.76 -17% | 2.89 -91% | 3.27 -117% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 6.03 -47% | 14.05 -243% | 4.85 -18% | 4.66 -14% | 5.43 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.52 | 0.9 -73% | 3.94 -658% | 1.01 -94% | 2.7 -419% | 2.33 -348% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.2 -121% | 8.7 -358% | 3.3 -74% | 6.9 -263% | 2.9 -53% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.099 105% | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6787 96% | 6622 98% | 8672 75% | 7233 90% | 7904 82% | 6071 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71 | 66 | 76 | 76.8 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 89 | 100 | 99.5 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-27% | -63% /
-119% | 1% /
-14% | -17% /
-49% | -11% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间很好，完全覆盖sRGB。更便宜的笔记本电脑，如华硕VivoBook或英菲尼克斯INBook X1 Pro可能只覆盖60%的sRGB，而颜色明显偏浅。
该面板开箱即被很好地校准，平均灰度和彩色DeltaE值分别仅为1.9和1.51。因此，不需要进行终端用户校准，就可以最大限度地发挥显示器的作用。正如我们下面的截图所示，无论如何，自己校准面板实际上会导致DeltaE值稍好一些。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
在阴凉处，户外能见度还不错，因为显示屏的亮度不足以克服阳光或一般日光。某些型号如 HP EliteBook 1040或 三星笔记本9如果室外能见度是一个问题，则提供明显更亮的显示屏。
性能 - 第11代英特尔电源
虽然我们的设备配备了酷睿i7-1165G7，但威刚也计划提供一个较低的酷睿i5-1135G7版本。除此之外，这两种选择都将配备完全相同的机箱和硬件。
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前，我们的设备被设置为高性能模式，以获得尽可能高的分数。
处理器
CPU性能出色，多线程结果比平均水平高12%至22%。 酷睿i7-1165G7笔记本电脑。事实上，整体性能仅次于 酷睿i7-11375H尽管后者是来自同一Tiger Lake 系列的更耗电的H系列CPU。
降级到 酷睿i5-1135G7SKU，预计会在性能上产生10%到15%的差距。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø946 (939.14-960.68)
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø602 (507.87-688.11)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø886 (876-943.04)
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø818 (811.51-869.07)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark分数与其他配备相同Core i7-1165G7 CPU的笔记本电脑一致。配备罕见的Core i7-11375H的VAIO Z平均只高出几个百分点。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5207 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在我们的主页上打开多个标签或以4K60流媒体视频时，没有延迟问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 支持PCIe 4
当然，我们的XPG笔记本电脑配备了一个XPG品牌的 Gammix S50 Lite NVMe 1.4固态硬盘。这个特定的512GB SKU的最高速度分别为3200MB/s和2800MB/s的连续读取和写入，超过了大多数NVMe 1.3固态硬盘。尽管如此，它并不是目前最快的PCIe 4固态硬盘，因为价格较高的三星PM9A1明显要快2倍。
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 18% | -32% | 22% | 7% | 43% | |
| Seq Read | 3043 | 3760 24% | 2135 -30% | 3021 -1% | 2975 -2% | 5533 82% |
| Seq Write | 1462 | 2335 60% | 1776 21% | 2341 60% | 1261 -14% | 3289 125% |
| 4K Read | 66.6 | 66.8 0% | 28.88 -57% | 47.9 -28% | 49.97 -25% | 72.5 9% |
| 4K Write | 217.6 | 184.3 -15% | 147.9 -32% | 186.7 -14% | 168.4 -23% | 213.7 -2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 732 | 1801 146% | 712 -3% | 1472 101% | 1539 110% | 2128 191% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1706 | 1754 3% | 643 -62% | 1829 7% | 1517 -11% | 2032 19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.039 | 0.135 -246% | 0.052 -33% | 0.06 -54% | 0.036 8% | 0.039 -0% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.063 | 0.018 71% | 0.092 -46% | 0.021 67% | 0.026 59% | 0.06 5% |
| Score Read | 1103 | 2244 103% | 954 -14% | 1822 65% | 1886 71% | 2754 150% |
| Score Write | 2069 | 2172 5% | 968 -53% | 2249 9% | 1811 -12% | 2574 24% |
| Score Total | 3678 | 5500 50% | 2395 -35% | 4973 35% | 4579 24% | 6629 80% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 3306 | 1296 -61% | 1510 -54% | 2235 -32% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 1087 | 900 -17% | 950 -13% | 796 -27% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1988 | 1588 -20% | 1470 -26% | 1652 -17% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 14% | -10% | 12% | 5% | 51% | |
| Write 4K | 182.5 | 248.4 36% | 228.3 25% | 223.7 23% | 198.9 9% | 236.7 30% |
| Read 4K | 69.4 | 56.4 -19% | 60.7 -13% | 51.2 -26% | 55.9 -19% | 78.6 13% |
| Write Seq | 2171 | 2513 16% | 1895 -13% | 2579 19% | 2441 12% | 3689 70% |
| Read Seq | 2924 | 2250 -23% | 1573 -46% | 2553 -13% | 1939 -34% | 4340 48% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 486.5 | 589 21% | 476.6 -2% | 671 38% | 631 30% | 646 33% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 506 | 696 38% | 592 17% | 761 50% | 704 39% | 717 42% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2832 | 2515 -11% | 2136 -25% | 2721 -4% | 2566 -9% | 4396 55% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3177 | 4915 55% | 2413 -24% | 3358 6% | 3451 9% | 6804 114% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
17% | -21% /
-24% | 17% /
18% | 6% /
6% | 47% /
46% |
* ... smaller is better
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3177 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2832 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
506 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
486.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2924 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2171 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
69.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
182.5 MB/s
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
GPU性能--Iris Xe的救援
图形性能很好，帧率一直领先于我们数据库中具有相同集成度的平均笔记本电脑。 Iris Xe 96 EUs GPU至少有几个百分点。我们怀疑宽敞的32GB内存在小规模性能提升中发挥了作用。
闲置的 Witcher 3一个多小时，显示出稳定的帧率，只有一次下滑，幸运的是没有出现第二次下滑。
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7471, n=194) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1926 - 7238, n=193) | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6902 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19060 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4414 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1673 points | |
Help | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=175) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 28, n=171) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=164) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
ADATA XPG Xenia 14: Ø87.8 (62-94)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88.5 | 56.7 | 27.8 | 13.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.8 | 79 | 50.6 | 46.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.8 | 22.2 | 17.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 27.4 | 36.9 | 32.7 |
Emissions
系统噪音--只有在游戏时才会很响
内部45毫米的风扇通常在发送电子邮件或浏览网页时运行，但它仍然足够安静，只有27.2分贝(A)或更低，在大多数情况下是无法察觉的。直到系统受到高负荷的压力，如游戏，风扇噪音可能在37至47 dB(A)之间，Xenia 14才会比许多其他副笔记本更响亮。
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11375H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 6% | -1% | 6% | -10% | |
| off / environment * | 25.2 | 24 5% | 24.6 2% | 24 5% | 26 -3% | 26.1 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.2 | 25 1% | 25.1 -0% | 24 5% | 26 -3% | 26.1 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 26.5 | 27 -2% | 25.1 5% | 25 6% | 26 2% | 26.1 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.5 | 39 -47% | 25.1 5% | 28 -6% | 26 2% | 29.9 -13% |
| Load Average * | 30.9 | 43 -39% | 32.7 -6% | 36 -17% | 30.5 1% | 36.3 -17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 39 -4% | 33.4 11% | 43.7 -17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 46.7 | 43 8% | 33.4 28% | 46 1% | 30.5 35% | 55.4 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.2 / 26.5 / 26.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.9 / 46.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) | ||
温度
表面温度在后部最热，在键盘顶排附近可以达到39摄氏度，在长时间运行高负载时，底部甚至可以达到45摄氏度。笔记本电脑的其他部分仍然相对凉爽，因此皮肤温度平均来说仍然很低。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4.3 °C / 7.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4.3 °C / 7.7 F).
压力测试
当用Prime95强调时，CPU会在几秒钟内提升到4.1GHz，然后稳步下降并稳定在3.2GHz和89C。与其他具有相同CPU的笔记本电脑相比，它的涡轮增压潜力相当高。最近的 Pavilion 15例如，在相同的Prime95条件下，它将稳定在较慢的2.0至2.5GHz范围内。
用电池运行不会严重影响性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为11920和6447分，而在主电源上则为12024和6571分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲时 | -- | -- | 38 |
| Prime95压力 | 3.2 - 3.3 | -- | 90 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 2.6 | 950 | 83 |
| Witcher 3 Stress | 2.8 | 1300 | 66 |
发言人
音频质量可能是Xenia 14更令人失望的方面之一。不仅低音再现不佳，而且最大音量也偏低。你将需要耳机或外部扬声器来播放多媒体。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management — High Performance-per-Watt
消耗功率
该系统非常省电，在桌面上闲置时，根据亮度水平仅消耗3W至6W。运行像游戏这样的高要求负载将消耗约44W，高于我们在Honor Magicbook 14或LG Gram 14上记录的相同的CPU和GPU，但整体性能在我们的威刚系统上略高。
我们能够从小型（约10.7 x 4.5 x 3.1厘米）65瓦交流适配器上记录到76.4瓦的临时最大功耗。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.27 / 1.8 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 5.5 / 5.9 Watt |
| Load |
44.4 / 76.4 Watt |
   
| |
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L i7-11375H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -45% | -16% | 8% | -88% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 5 -72% | 5 -72% | 4 -38% | 2.5 14% | 9.5 -228% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 7 -27% | 11.5 -109% | 6 -9% | 5.3 4% | 13.7 -149% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.9 | 11 -86% | 12 -103% | 10 -69% | 9.5 -61% | 14.4 -144% |
| Load Average * | 44.4 | 54 -22% | 48.7 -10% | 34 23% | 26.2 41% | 54.3 -22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.6 | 39 16% | 46.4 -0% | 46.1 1% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 76.4 | 65 15% | 58.8 23% | 68 11% | 42.8 44% | 65.5 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø46.6 (41.7-55.7)
Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø46.4 (45-55.2)
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.7 (57.5-76.1)
Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø42.9 (38-58.7)
电池寿命
53Wh电池的运行时间很好，实际使用WLAN的时间接近10小时，与我们在Honor MagicBook 14上观察到的类似。从空电到满电的充电速度相当快，大约1小时15分钟。用户还可以通过笔记本边缘的两个USB-C接口中的任何一个进行充电。
| ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.4 Wh | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 55 Wh | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L i7-11375H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | -14% | -2% | 44% | -28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 592 | 451 -24% | 508 -14% | 580 -2% | 854 44% | 424 -28% |
| Reader / Idle | 825 | 2925 | ||||
| Load | 68 | 107 | 219 |
Pros
+ 可升级2倍内存和2倍PCIe 2280 NVMe SSD
+ 在低至中度负荷下保持安静
+ 强大的CPU和GPU性能
+ 支持外部图形
+ 非常轻，<1公斤
Cons
- 平均显示响应时间
- 铰链可以更紧固
- 底盘容易弯曲
- 内部扬声器较弱
- 没有网络摄像头快门
结论 - 1公斤以下的14英寸笔记本电脑排行榜
在这次审查中，我们并没有很高的期望。威刚并不完全以其笔记本电脑而闻名，因此我们对其第一款14英寸超极本没有太多期待。尽管如此，我们对Xenia 14的外观和性能都感到惊喜。它不仅非常轻，而且有一个色彩准确的16:10显示屏，CPU和GPU性能高，内存和固态硬盘易于维修，有大量的端口选项，包括Thunderbolt 4，电池寿命长。考虑到它的尺寸和重量，它有很多冲力和功能，甚至优于 LG Gram系列.
威刚Xenia 14并没有为了达到<1公斤的超轻目标重量而牺牲性能或功能。
有改进的余地，特别是在铰链方面，我们发现它是机箱最薄弱的方面。压倒性的扬声器、软键盘键和缺乏网络摄像头快门也是一些小挫折。在这方面，更重的惠普Spectre可能是更好的选择。除此之外，Xenia 14在我们的名单中接近顶端，适合旅行者或学生购买现代超轻14英寸笔记本电脑。
ADATA XPG Xenia 14
-
07/14/2021 v7
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
