宏碁 Swift 16 AI 评测：高性能与出色散热的完美结合
新款宏碁 Swift 16 AI 将英特尔的 Panther Lake 架构与鲜艳的 OLED 屏幕和超大触摸板完美结合。硬件安装在光滑的机箱中，并得益于出色的冷却系统。工作温度非常低。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.4 kgIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
英特尔Arc B390（或Arc Pro B390）是英特尔Panther Lake SoC系列中功能最强大的集成图形单元，提供12个Xe3内核。这相当于 96 个 CU 和 1,536 个 ALU。
性能表现
在 3DMarkSteel Nomad 等合成基准测试中，Arc B390 达到了 RTX 2060 笔记本电脑 GPU 的水平的水平，但仍明显落后于现代 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU.不过，在我们的游戏基准测试中，B390 在相关设置下仍明显落后于 2060 Mobile。快速 AMD Radeon 8050S(Strix Halo）也明显更快。较旧的 英特尔 Arc 140T(箭湖）明显落后（如在游戏中落后 75%）。
此外，性能在很大程度上取决于散热和保证的 TDP 限制。不过，即使在要求苛刻的游戏中，如《Anno 117》或《The Outer Worlds 2》，其性能也足以在低设置下达到可玩帧率。
功能特点
新的媒体引擎现在支持 AV1 编解码、VVC 解码、AVC 10 位和 eDP 1.5。iGPU 通过双通道内存控制器支持快速 LPDDR5-9600（最大 96 GB）或 DDR5-7200（最大 128 GB）。
芯片由台积电采用现代 N3E 工艺制造。
| Codename | Panther Lake iGPU |
| iGPU | Integrated Graphics |
| Pipelines | 96 - unified |
| Raytracing Cores | 12 |
| Core Speed | 2500 (Boost) MHz |
| AI GPU | 122 TOPS INT8 |
| Cache | L1: 768 KB, L2: 16 MB |
| Shared Memory | yes |
| API | DirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0 |
| Man. Technology | 3 nm |
| Displays | 4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 |
| Date of Announcement | 05.01.2026 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benchmarks
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
7.5 pt (22%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
...
max:
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 919 avg: 966 median: 982 (7%) max: 1040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1460 avg: 1588 median: 1590.5 (11%) max: 1667 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 5821 avg: 6016 median: 6000 (14%) max: 6338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
45597 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 25117 avg: 27254 median: 27638 (11%) max: 30578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 13329 avg: 14068 median: 14069 (21%) max: 14605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 16244 avg: 16858 median: 16951.5 (16%) max: 17498 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 341014 avg: 369197 median: 369196 (41%) max: 397379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6414 avg: 7321 median: 7436 (19%) max: 7807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4567 avg: 6498 median: 6679 (14%) max: 7190 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
...
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
632405 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
296292 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 35193 avg: 43900 median: 44565 (42%) max: 48108 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 67290 avg: 75478 median: 75181 (18%) max: 82808 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 47254 avg: 47393 median: 47254 (45%) max: 47672 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 71605 avg: 72723 median: 72722.5 (28%) max: 73840 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 18263 avg: 18591 median: 18576 (22%) max: 19256 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18261 avg: 18432 median: 18329 (14%) max: 18819 Points
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
0%
100%
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
44482 Points (49%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
AMD Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon 680M
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
...
max:
0%
100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 47.9 avg: 50.7 median: 50.7 (15%) max: 53.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6 avg: 254.5 median: 104.6 (3%) max: 623 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 55433 avg: 56512 median: 56522 (14%) max: 58162 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 49510 avg: 58401 median: 60061 (15%) max: 62177 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1449 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3930 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10533 points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56 avg: 60.3 median: 61 (8%) max: 63.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 51.4 avg: 63.6 median: 61.3 (17%) max: 76.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34 avg: 59.1 median: 60.9 (8%) max: 75.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4542 avg: 0.7 median: 0.7 (3%) max: 0.793 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
- Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
- Average benchmark values* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Forza Horizon 6
2026
War Thunder
2026
Pragmata
2026
Death Stranding 2
2026
Crimson Desert
2026
Anno 117: Pax Romana
2025
ARC Raiders
2025low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Outer Worlds 2
2025
Battlefield 6
2025
Borderlands 4
2025
F1 25
2025
Doom: The Dark Ages
2025
Civilization 7
2025
Monster Hunter Wilds
2025
Marvel Rivals
2024
Stalker 2
2024
EA Sports FC 25
2024
Final Fantasy XVI
2024
Space Marine 2
2024
Black Myth: Wukong
2024low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
F1 24
2024low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Helldivers 2
2024
Ready or Not
2023
The Finals
2023
Alan Wake 2
2023
Total War Pharaoh
2023
Counter-Strike 2
2023
Cyberpunk 2077
2023low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
Baldur's Gate 3
2023low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
Starfield
2023
The Witcher 3 v4
2023
Elden Ring
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Death Stranding
2020
Valorant
2020
Doom Eternal
2020
Control
2019
Strange Brigade
2018low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5
2018
X-Plane 11.11
2018low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2 Reborn
2015low 1280x720
med. 1366x768
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3
2015low 1024x768
med. 1366x768
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
GTA V
2015low 1024x768
med. 1366x768
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.35
Notebook reviews with Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card
Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG 评测：微星新标识看起来很时尚
最新的 Prestige 16 为该系列带来了重大变化，包括英特尔 Panther Lake、所有配置的 OLED 以及全新的外观。不过，与去年的设计相比，一些关键功能有所缺失或减少。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.6 kg
戴尔 XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H 评测：退出英伟达，加入英特尔 Arc B390
Core Ultra X7 XPS 16 配置比基本型号贵 400 美元，提供更多内存、更大存储空间和显著更高的性能，而无需提高风扇噪音、功耗或温度。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.7 kg
凯达斯 Mind Pro 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 和 Arc 图形处理器的高端迷你电脑是 Khadas 生态系统的完美基础
卡达斯通过 Mind Pro 扩展了 Mind 系列，并采用了最新一代的英特尔处理器。在我们的测试中，我们将仔细观察配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 处理器的机型，通过大量基准测试分析其性能，并考察其与 Mind Graphics 2 的结合性能。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 566 g
豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测
微星推出的 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 是一款小巧的 14 英寸可折叠电脑，配备快速的 Panther Lake 处理器和集成手写笔。不过，内置的 60 Hz OLED 屏幕非常暗，而且不支持 HDR。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kgDell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测：搭载英特尔豹湖 X7，全面重生
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
Review » 英特尔 Panther Lake Arc B390 性能和效率分析：英特尔新 iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 互有胜负
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测：英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则
Review » 英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake，超越 Zen 5
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
External Review » 戴尔 XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
External Review » 宏碁 Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX
HP OmniBook X 16 (2026): Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
External Review » HP OmniBook X 16 (2026)
Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.3 kg
External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171
HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1 kg
External Review » HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
External Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
External Review » 宏碁 Swift 16 AI SF16-71T
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
External Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA
MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
External Review » SamsungGalaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
» 宏碁 Swift 16 即使在压力下也能保持凉爽
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
» 宏碁 Swift 16 即使在压力下也能保持凉爽
MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
» 微星Prestige 16 AI+的65瓦交流适配器会使充电速度遇到瓶颈
» 微星威望 16 C3MTG 是目前市场上最好的 XPS 16 替代品之一
» 2026 Prestige 16 在 1080p 超高画质下运行《赛博朋克 2077》的速度超过 45 FPS，而它甚至不是一台游戏笔记本电脑
» 微星可能不想让你知道的 2026 Prestige 16 的所有变化
» 微星 Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG 在平衡模式下运行噪音明显降低，但有一个问题
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
» 与最新的 XPS 16 相比，选择戴尔 16 Premium 的两大理由
» 戴尔 XPS 16 酷睿 Ultra X7 比酷睿 Ultra 5 声音更大、更耗电
» 戴尔 XPS 配备了比大多数其他笔记本电脑更多的电池充电选项
» 戴尔 XPS 16 OLED 配置带来了一些有趣的优缺点
» 避免选择新的 XPS 16 Core Ultra 7，而直接选择性能更优越的 Core Ultra X7
Khadas Mind Pro: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 0.6 kg
» 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑价格上涨：预购价格有效期至 3 月 27 日
» 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑评测：从办公电脑到配备GeForce RTX GPU 的游戏系统
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
» 华硕新款 Zenbook Duo UX8407 堪称最佳双屏可折叠产品
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
» 戴尔 XPS 14 Arc B390 与GeForce RTX 4050：3DMark 对比不能说明一切
» 在打开 2026 型之前，请务必阅读戴尔 XPS 14 维修手册
» 2026 戴尔 XPS 14 解决了该系列最令人不满的一些问题
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
» 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验：所有型号、价格和上市日期
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
» Core Ultra X7 358H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H：Panther Lake 节流更少，性能更稳定
» Arc B390 与 Radeon 8060S：相同的 14 英寸屏幕尺寸，两款截然不同的 GPU
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
» AMD 毫无胜算：英特尔豹湖酷睿 X9 388H 在低功耗下击败 AMD Strix Halo，预示 2026 年掌上游戏的霸主地位
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
» 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 的速度与许多入门级游戏笔记本电脑不相上下，体积却只有它们的一半
Add as a preferred source on Google
