Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU

配备 12 个 Xe3 的英特尔 Arc B390(或 Arc Pro B390)Panther Lake iGPU 是英特尔 Panther Lake SoC 系列中功能最强大的集成图形处理器,拥有 12 个 Xe3 内核。12 个 Xe3 内核可产生 96 个 CU 和 1,536 个 ALU。

到目前为止,这些信息还只是基于传言和泄露的信息。不过,初步基准测试表明,该处理器的性能比 英特尔 Arc 140T相比,性能大幅提升。

英特尔自己也表示,Panther Lake iGPU 的性能比 Lunar Lake (英特尔Arc 140V)相比,每瓦特性能比箭湖H(英特尔Arc 140V)提高了40%以上。英特尔弧 140T).这意味着,目前 AMD 的 RDNA 3.5 iGPU (AMD Radeon 890MStrix Point APU 中的 AMD Radeon 890M)的性能应明显优于 AMD Radeon 890M。不过,它可能仍将落后于 Strix Halo (AMD Radeon 8050S).

此外,性能在很大程度上取决于散热和保证的 TDP。不过,对于要求苛刻的游戏,如《Anno 117》或《The Outer Worlds 2》,其性能也足以在低设置下实现可玩帧率。

新媒体引擎现在支持 AV1 编解码、VVC 解码、AVC 10 位和 eDP 1.5。

芯片采用现代 N3E 工艺在台积电制造。

CodenamePanther Lake iGPU
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines96 - unified
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU122 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 16 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2500 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 924     avg: 982     median: 982 (7%)     max: 1040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
1667 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 6000     avg: 6169     median: 6169 (14%)     max: 6338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
30578 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 14258     avg: 14400     median: 14336 (22%)     max: 14605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 17054     avg: 17292     median: 17324 (16%)     max: 17498 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7270     avg: 7541     median: 7546 (20%)     max: 7807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4567     avg: 6376     median: 6500 (13%)     max: 7190 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -98%
...
5653 -11%
5702 -11%
5830 -9%
5851 -8%
5869 -8%
5933 -7%
5934 -7%
6121 -4%
6206 -3%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
6376
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
6422 1%
6745 6%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6764 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
6867 8%
7129 12%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
7284 14%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
7432 17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7445 17%
7494 18%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 265%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 602%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 44565     avg: 46302     median: 46301.5 (44%)     max: 48038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 75907     avg: 79358     median: 79357.5 (20%)     max: 82808 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 18603     avg: 18829     median: 18628 (23%)     max: 19256 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18313     avg: 18625     median: 18743 (14%)     max: 18819 Points
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
16233 -13%
16564 -11%
16970 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
17028 -9%
17562 -6%
17690 -5%
17711 -5%
17889 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
18037 -3%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
18625
19016 2%
19109 3%
19467 5%
19881 7%
20096 8%
20096 8%
20464 10%
20506 10%
21459 15%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 267%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 597%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
53.5 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 201     avg: 227     median: 228 (13%)     max: 252 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 277.4     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 623 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 56493     avg: 56769     median: 56527 (14%)     max: 57288 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 58963     avg: 60351     median: 60061 (15%)     max: 62028 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56     avg: 59.3     median: 58.2 (8%)     max: 63.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 51.4     avg: 63     median: 61.3 (17%)     max: 76.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 55.3     median: 53.5 (7%)     max: 75.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.533     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.793 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
104.3 111.2 176.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57 57.5 58.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.4 42.5 43.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29.4 30.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2 20.1 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
147.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92 92.8 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
28
29.6
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
267  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
154.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
69.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
43 45 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
51
69
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
145.2 145.9 146.3 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132.2 134.3 135 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.7 104.3 104.7 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.2 38 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.8 25.2 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
225  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
68.6 77.7 78.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.2 63.1 63.2 63.9 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.9 53.8 54 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2 33.2 36.5 40.9 41.2 44.8 47.2 47.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.7 28.3 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
110.6
94.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
20.2
16.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
40.1
39.1
34.2
31.4
26.1
46.3
40.6
low 1920x1080
64.3 68.2 71.4 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
52.3 55.4 60.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.7 49 54.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.6 48.7 50.1 53.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.4 34.9 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
93.8
87
low 1280x720
180  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 70 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
384 388 400 ~ 391 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132.7 138.6 141.2 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.3 103.4 107.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.1 99.4 99.5 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 71.7 72.3 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
51.8 58.5 59.7 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.5 47.1 47.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.7 40.3 41.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
123.5 134.5 134.8 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.7 76.1 83 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8 54.1 55.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39 41 43.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
119.8 135 154.5 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
92.6 95.4 102.3 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.5 107.6 109.8 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.5 105.4 111.8 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
176.7 179.4 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171 173 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.2 111.9 113.8 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.3 45.1 45.3 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.6 30.9 31.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
171.3
168.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
175.2
172
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 117: Pax Romana5842.930.417.712.3
ARC Raiders13158432920
The Outer Worlds 25243.633.417.9
Battlefield 66254.446.934.825
F1 25147.812192
Assassin's Creed Shadows3433292118
Civilization 7267154.298.869.8
Monster Hunter Wilds40.133.13125.4
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle42.634.233.229.621.1
Black Myth: Wukong4435271511
F1 241461341033825
Total War Pharaoh225150.3108.991.962
Cyberpunk 20777562524027
Baldur's Gate 36856504935
Shadow of the Tomb Raider18087816848
Strange Brigade3911371059871
Far Cry 514287797353
X-Plane 11.11574740
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark131785441
Dota 2 Reborn13697107107
GTA V1781721084531
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

7
3
11

10
5
6
2
10
9
7
5
5
8
5
3



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 22. 18:01:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Feb 2026 05:30:28 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.015s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13268 +0.016s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 13268 +0.02s ... 0.051s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.299s ... 1.35s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.35s

#12 Got 368 rows for game benchmarks. +0.081s ... 1.431s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.431s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 1.446s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.223s ... 1.669s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.588s ... 2.257s

#17 return log +0s ... 2.257s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测:搭载英特尔豹湖 X7,全面重生

戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测:搭载英特尔豹湖 X7,全面重生

XPS 系列在发展道路上经历了一些坎坷,但最新的 Panther Lake XPS 14 让这个家族重回正轨,比最近的任何前代产品都更容易获得推荐。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg
英特尔 Arc B390 性能和效率分析。(图片来源:英特尔)

英特尔 Panther Lake Arc B390 性能和效率分析:英特尔新 iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 互有胜负

英特尔新推出的 Panther Lake 处理器不仅提供了更高的 CPU 性能,最重要的是还采用了速度极快的集成显卡。Arc B390 比以前的 iGPU 快约 70%,甚至能赶上GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU 的速度。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg
华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测:英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测:英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

随着酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 的首次亮相,华硕和英特尔为今年开了个好头。虽然从技术上讲这是一款面向商务的笔记本电脑,但其图形性能和每瓦性能对于一款 14 英寸的笔记本电脑来说都是超乎寻常的。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.1 kg
华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则

华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则

华硕为 2026 年重新设计了双屏 ZenBook Duo 可折叠本,使其在多个方面都更胜一筹。其中包括新的英特尔豹湖处理器,CPU 内核效率更高,iGPU 速度更快,几乎可以让GeForce RTX 4050 变得无关紧要。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg
英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake,超越 Zen 5

英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake,超越 Zen 5

英特尔公司代号为 Panther Lake 的新移动处理器旨在提供更高的性能和效率。我们用酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 测试了最新的顶级型号,以了解新一代处理器在性能和效率方面的真正优势。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕新款 Zenbook Duo UX8407 堪称最佳双屏可折叠产品

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 戴尔 XPS 14 Arc B390 与GeForce RTX 4050:3DMark 对比不能说明一切

   » 在打开 2026 型之前,请务必阅读戴尔 XPS 14 维修手册

   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 14 解决了该系列最令人不满的一些问题

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验:所有型号、价格和上市日期

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Core Ultra X7 358H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H:Panther Lake 节流更少,性能更稳定

   » Arc B390 与 Radeon 8060S:相同的 14 英寸屏幕尺寸,两款截然不同的 GPU

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » AMD 毫无胜算:英特尔豹湖酷睿 X9 388H 在低功耗下击败 AMD Strix Halo,预示 2026 年掌上游戏的霸主地位

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 的速度与许多入门级游戏笔记本电脑不相上下,体积却只有它们的一半

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)