Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU

配备 12 个 Xe3 的英特尔 Arc B390(或 Arc Pro B390)Panther Lake iGPU 是英特尔 Panther Lake SoC 系列中功能最强大的集成图形处理器,拥有 12 个 Xe3 内核。12 个 Xe3 内核可产生 96 个 CU 和 1,536 个 ALU。

到目前为止,这些信息还只是基于传言和泄露的信息。不过,初步基准测试表明,该处理器的性能比 英特尔 Arc 140T相比,性能大幅提升。

英特尔自己也表示,Panther Lake iGPU 的性能比 Lunar Lake (英特尔Arc 140V)相比,每瓦特性能比箭湖H(英特尔Arc 140V)提高了40%以上。英特尔弧 140T).这意味着,目前 AMD 的 RDNA 3.5 iGPU (AMD Radeon 890MStrix Point APU 中的 AMD Radeon 890M)的性能应明显优于 AMD Radeon 890M。不过,它可能仍将落后于 Strix Halo (AMD Radeon 8050S).

此外,性能在很大程度上取决于散热和保证的 TDP。不过,对于要求苛刻的游戏,如《Anno 117》或《The Outer Worlds 2》,其性能也足以在低设置下实现可玩帧率。

新媒体引擎现在支持 AV1 编解码、VVC 解码、AVC 10 位和 eDP 1.5。

芯片采用现代 N3E 工艺在台积电制造。

CodenamePanther Lake iGPU
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines96 - unified
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU122 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 16 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.4 pt (19%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
5.1 -20%
5.49 -14%
5.49 -14%
5.52 -13%
5.55 -13%
5.55 -13%
5.58 -13%
6.11 -4%
6.24 -2%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
6.38
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6.38 0%
6.45 1%
6.49 2%
6.61 4%
6.81 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
6.91 8%
6.97 9%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
7.41 16%
7.63 20%
...
19 198%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 422%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 924     avg: 985     median: 987 (7%)     max: 1040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1460     avg: 1595     median: 1627 (11%)     max: 1667 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 6000     avg: 6147     median: 6102 (14%)     max: 6338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
45597 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 27638     avg: 28679     median: 27822 (13%)     max: 30578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 13997     avg: 14231     median: 14189 (21%)     max: 14605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 16560     avg: 17057     median: 17036 (16%)     max: 17498 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
341014 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7270     avg: 7509     median: 7497 (19%)     max: 7807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4567     avg: 6512     median: 6830 (14%)     max: 7190 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -98%
...
5702 -12%
5830 -10%
5851 -10%
5869 -10%
5934 -9%
6050 -7%
6121 -6%
6206 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
6422 -1%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
6512
6745 4%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6764 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
6867 5%
7129 9%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
7284 12%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
7432 14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7445 14%
7494 15%
7651 17%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 257%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 588%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
632405 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
296292 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 39015     avg: 43973     median: 44418.5 (42%)     max: 48038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 71453     avg: 76156     median: 75181 (18%)     max: 82808 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
47672 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
73840 Points (28%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 18263     avg: 18623     median: 18615.5 (23%)     max: 19256 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18261     avg: 18469     median: 18340 (14%)     max: 18819 Points
171.8 -99%
...
16289 -12%
16564 -10%
16970 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
17028 -8%
17562 -5%
17690 -4%
17711 -4%
17889 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
18037 -2%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
18469
19016 3%
19109 3%
19467 5%
19881 8%
20096 9%
20096 9%
20464 11%
20506 11%
21459 16%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 270%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 603%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
66984 Points (19%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
60674 Points (33%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
51396 -15%
52230 -14%
52733 -13%
52917 -13%
53510 -12%
54830 -10%
58792 -3%
60089 -1%
60439 0%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
60674
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
62557 3%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
62862 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
63088 4%
63137 4%
64680 7%
66003 9%
66376 9%
66735 10%
66766 10%
...
132443 118%
max:
173912 187%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
44482 Points (49%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
35208 -21%
35662 -20%
36346 -18%
36878 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 -15%
39066 -12%
AMD Radeon 660M
41139 -8%
43138 -3%
AMD Radeon 680M
44442 0%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
44482
44877 1%
44915 1%
46269 4%
46696 5%
47870 8%
48758 10%
50821 14%
50971 15%
52117 17%
...
68868 55%
max:
87172 96%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
46797 Points (61%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 47.9     avg: 50.7     median: 50.7 (15%)     max: 53.5 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
76.9 fps (19%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.8 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
50.3 fps (9%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
37.3 fps (10%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.7 fps (1%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
45.5 fps (18%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
87.2 fps (14%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
103 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
86.5 fps (23%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.9 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
49.6 fps (8%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
48.8 fps (8%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
132 fps (15%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
11.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
78.9 fps (11%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
129 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
101 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
7.2 fps (1%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
23.6 fps (7%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
179 fps (19%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
11.6 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
48.8 fps (17%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
30.2 fps (15%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
38.6 fps (10%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
7.1 fps (1%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
9.5 fps (6%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
69.4 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
7.7 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
28.9 fps (13%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
19.5 fps (13%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
26.9 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
11538 points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
131.4 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 201     avg: 237.6     median: 240 (14%)     max: 264.54 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 250.4     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 623 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 55780     avg: 56524     median: 56524.5 (14%)     max: 57288 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 49510     avg: 58097     median: 59512 (15%)     max: 62177 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1449 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3930 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10533 points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56     avg: 60.6     median: 61 (8%)     max: 63.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 51.4     avg: 62.3     median: 61.3 (17%)     max: 76.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 57.6     median: 60 (8%)     max: 75.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.533     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (3%)     max: 0.793 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
36.2 dB(A) (52%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
104.3 111.2 176.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57 57.5 58.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.4 42.5 43.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29.4 30.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2 20.1 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
147.8 149.8 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121 124.1 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92 92.8 94.8 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
28
29.6
29.9
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
267  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
154.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
69.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
43 45 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34 35 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 28 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 15 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
51
69
71
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
136.5 142.7 145.2 145.9 146.3 160.3 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.3 132.2 134.3 135 135.3 147.7 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100.7 103.4 104.3 104.7 109.6 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.2 36.2 36.8 38 38.4 38.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.8 25.2 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
225  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
68.6 75 77.7 78.7 80.4 85.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.2 59.7 63.1 63.2 63.9 65.4 68.6 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.9 49.7 53.8 54 56 57.8 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2 33.2 36.5 40.9 41.2 44.8 45.5 47.2 47.7 48.7 50.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.7 28.3 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
110.6
94.4
121.4
116.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
20.2
16.1
21
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
40.1
39.1
34.2
31.4
26.1
46.3
40.6
43.9
46.3
46
low 1920x1080
63.8 64.3 68.2 69.2 71.4 72.3 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.5 52.2 52.3 55.4 60.8 62.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.7 45.7 47 49 54.3 55.6 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42.3 44.6 44.6 48.7 50.1 53.4 54.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.4 34.9 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
93.8
87
84.3
97.2
low 1280x720
180  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 70 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
334 359 374 384 388 400 ~ 373 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121.9 130.5 132.7 136.6 138.6 141.2 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.3 103.3 103.4 104 107.6 116.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80 90.6 95.1 99.4 99.5 101.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 71.7 72.3 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
51.8 55.9 58.4 58.5 59.7 62.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.5 46.4 47.1 47.5 47.6 50.3 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.8 39.7 40.3 41.2 41.7 41.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
107.2 123.5 131.1 134.5 134.8 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.7 73.7 76.1 79.7 83 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8 52.8 54.1 55.4 56.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.8 39 41 43.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
108.3 112.9 119.8 129.5 135 154.5 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.5 88 91.6 92.6 95.4 102.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.2 100.3 103.5 104 107.6 109.8 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.8 96.9 101.5 102.5 105.4 111.8 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
294  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
198.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
123.4
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
175.9 176.7 179.4 182 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
169.3 171 173 176.1 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.2 99.7 103.3 108.8 111.9 113.8 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.3 43.4 44.2 45.1 45.2 45.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.6 30.9 31.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
171.3
168.2
165.2
172.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
175.2
172
170.7
180
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 117: Pax Romana5842.930.417.712.3
ARC Raiders13158432920
The Outer Worlds 25243.633.417.9
Battlefield 66254.446.934.825
F1 2514912393
Assassin's Creed Shadows3433292118
Civilization 7267154.298.869.8
Monster Hunter Wilds40.133.13125.4
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle42.634.233.229.621.1
Black Myth: Wukong4535281511
F1 241461361043725
Total War Pharaoh225150.3108.991.962
Cyberpunk 20777863534227
Baldur's Gate 36855494835
Shadow of the Tomb Raider18087816848
Strange Brigade3731341069471
Far Cry 514287797353
X-Plane 11.11584741
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark126755139
Dota 2 Reborn12792104101
The Witcher 3294198.8106.546.6
GTA V1791721064431
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

7
3
12

10
5
7
2
10
10
7
6
5
8
5
3



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 11. 20:07:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:31:15 +0200 +0.006s ... 0.006s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13268 +0.065s ... 0.09s

#8 got single benchmarks 13268 +0.033s ... 0.123s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.123s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +4.013s ... 4.136s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 4.136s

#12 Got 465 rows for game benchmarks. +0.131s ... 4.267s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 4.267s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 4.286s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.564s ... 4.851s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.125s ... 4.975s

#17 return log +0s ... 4.975s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

Khadas Mind Pro

凯达斯 Mind Pro 评测:配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 和 Arc 图形处理器的高端迷你电脑是 Khadas 生态系统的完美基础

卡达斯通过 Mind Pro 扩展了 Mind 系列,并采用了最新一代的英特尔处理器。在我们的测试中,我们将仔细观察配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 处理器的机型,通过大量基准测试分析其性能,并考察其与 Mind Graphics 2 的结合性能。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 566 g
豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

微星推出的 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 是一款小巧的 14 英寸可折叠电脑,配备快速的 Panther Lake 处理器和集成手写笔。不过,内置的 60 Hz OLED 屏幕非常暗,而且不支持 HDR。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg
戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测:搭载英特尔豹湖 X7,全面重生

戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测:搭载英特尔豹湖 X7,全面重生

XPS 系列在发展道路上经历了一些坎坷,但最新的 Panther Lake XPS 14 让这个家族重回正轨,比最近的任何前代产品都更容易获得推荐。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg
英特尔 Arc B390 性能和效率分析。(图片来源:英特尔)

英特尔 Panther Lake Arc B390 性能和效率分析:英特尔新 iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 互有胜负

英特尔新推出的 Panther Lake 处理器不仅提供了更高的 CPU 性能,最重要的是还采用了速度极快的集成显卡。Arc B390 比以前的 iGPU 快约 70%,甚至能赶上GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU 的速度。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg
华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测:英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测:英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

随着酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 的首次亮相,华硕和英特尔为今年开了个好头。虽然从技术上讲这是一款面向商务的笔记本电脑,但其图形性能和每瓦性能对于一款 14 英寸的笔记本电脑来说都是超乎寻常的。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.1 kg

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则

  Review » 英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake,超越 Zen 5

HP OmniBook X 16 (2026): Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 16 (2026)

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407AA

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » SamsungGalaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE

Khadas Mind Pro: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 0.6 kg
   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑价格上涨:预购价格有效期至 3 月 27 日

   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑评测:从办公电脑到配备GeForce RTX GPU 的游戏系统

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕新款 Zenbook Duo UX8407 堪称最佳双屏可折叠产品

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 戴尔 XPS 14 Arc B390 与GeForce RTX 4050:3DMark 对比不能说明一切

   » 在打开 2026 型之前,请务必阅读戴尔 XPS 14 维修手册

   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 14 解决了该系列最令人不满的一些问题

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验:所有型号、价格和上市日期

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Core Ultra X7 358H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H:Panther Lake 节流更少,性能更稳定

   » Arc B390 与 Radeon 8060S:相同的 14 英寸屏幕尺寸,两款截然不同的 GPU

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » AMD 毫无胜算:英特尔豹湖酷睿 X9 388H 在低功耗下击败 AMD Strix Halo,预示 2026 年掌上游戏的霸主地位

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 的速度与许多入门级游戏笔记本电脑不相上下,体积却只有它们的一半

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)