联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 酷睿 i7 笔记本电脑评测:与 AMD Ryzen 7 的艰苦较量
久负盛名的 ThinkPad T14s 系列今年又回来了,其 SKU 种类繁多,包括英特尔、AMD、IPS 和 OLED 等多种选择。我们已经评测过 AMD和 OLED系统,因此现在是检验英特尔 IPS 配置的最佳时机,看看它的比较结果如何。
我们的测试机配备了酷睿 i7-1365U vPro 和 1200p IPS 显示屏,售价约为 1400 美元。这是较实惠的配置之一,因为它不包括一些奢侈品,如广域网、智能卡和 500 万像素网络摄像头。
ThinkPad T14s 与其他 14 英寸商务笔记本竞争,如戴尔Latitude 7440,惠普 EliteBook 845 G10或 华硕 ExpertBook B9.
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % | 11/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.4 % | 11/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.5 % | 09/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.5 % | 09/2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.3 % | 07/2023 | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.5 % | 11/2023 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
要区分英特尔配置和 AMD 配置,除了它们的贴纸徽标外,还有一个简单的方法,那就是寻找 USB-C 端口旁边的 Thunderbolt 图标。除此之外,英特尔和 AMD 配置的机箱设计相同,没有其他视觉差异。
交流
与 Wi-Fi 6E(6 GHz)网络配对时,无线局域网性能稳定而出色。如下图所示,Wi-Fi 6(5 GHz)的性能稍显不稳定,但它仍然是可靠和完全可用的。
网络摄像头
我们的测试机配置的是 200 万像素网络摄像头,而不是 AMD 设备上的 500 万像素。红外摄像头是可选配置,而隐私滑块则是标配。
维护
显示屏
总共有以下六种(!)显示屏可供选择。我们的测试设备配置的是粗体字显示屏,它是最便宜的选择之一。
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,300 尼特,触摸屏,哑光,~60% sRGB
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,300 尼特,哑光,~60% sRGB
- 2240 x 1400,IPS,300 尼特,哑光, ~60% sRGB
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,400 尼特,哑光,100% sRGB
- 2800 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特(500 尼特 HDR),亮面,100% DCI-P3
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,500 尼特,触摸屏,哑光,100% sRGB
正如我们下面的测量结果所示,与高端面板相比,选择低端面板会明显牺牲色彩和亮度。我们建议至少选择第四种具有完整 sRGB 覆盖范围的面板,尤其是在进行图形编辑和改善户外可见度时。
没有高于 60 Hz 的显示屏可供选择,这是一个遗憾,因为与之竞争的 14 英寸子笔记本,如华硕专家本 B9拥有 90 Hz OLED 面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 322.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 733:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
41.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U B140UAK01.2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE LP140WU1-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE B140UAN02.1, IPS-AHVA LTPS wLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 7440 AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X ATNA40YK07-1 SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 68% | 80% | 74% | 80% | 115% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.9 | 68.3 71% | 74.8 87% | 70.6 77% | 75.4 89% | 99.9 150% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.7 | 96.5 62% | 98.9 66% | 100 68% | 99.9 67% | 100 68% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.2 | 70.6 71% | 76.7 86% | 72.4 76% | 76.2 85% | 93.6 127% |
Response Times | -54% | -90% | -88% | -98% | 90% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.7 ? | 41.6 ? -50% | 48.3 ? -74% | 59.7 ? -116% | 56 ? -102% | 2 ? 93% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.9 ? | 25.1 ? -58% | 32.6 ? -105% | 25.5 ? -60% | 30.8 ? -94% | 2 ? 87% |
PWM Frequency | 360 ? | |||||
Screen | 48% | 21% | 46% | 36% | 160% | |
Brightness middle | 322.5 | 455 41% | 376 17% | 409 27% | 517.3 60% | 389.9 21% |
Brightness | 296 | 453 53% | 369 25% | 391 32% | 488 65% | 390 32% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 86 1% | 92 8% | 88 4% | 99 16% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.24 45% | 0.23 48% | 0.27 39% | 0.34 23% | 0.0497 89% |
Contrast | 733 | 1896 159% | 1635 123% | 1515 107% | 1521 108% | 7845 970% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.72 | 2.8 25% | 4.3 -16% | 2.3 38% | 3.3 11% | 2.22 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.68 | 4.2 71% | 9.9 33% | 4.4 70% | 7.81 47% | 3.75 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 1.2 37% | 1.6 16% | 0.9 53% | 1.02 46% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.3 -8% | 6.4 -60% | 2.4 40% | 5.6 -40% | 2.4 40% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.11 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.06 107% | 2.37 93% | 2.187 101% |
CCT | 6064 107% | 7268 89% | 6019 108% | 6293 103% | 6804 96% | 6426 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
38% | 4% /
18% | 11% /
33% | 6% /
26% | 122% /
139% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器未经校准,其平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别为 4 和 3.72。正如我们下面的 CalMAN 屏幕截图所示,通过自行校准可以解决色温过高的问题,从而获得更准确的灰度和色彩。即便如此,由于上述色彩覆盖面较窄的原因,在饱和度较高的情况下,显示器仍然会变得更加不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.1 ms rise | |
↘ 7.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.2 ms rise | |
↘ 15.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想 Vantage 没有自己的电源配置文件集,以减少混淆。
处理器
酷睿 i7-1365U 酷睿 i7-1365U的单线程性能仅比 酷睿 i5-1335U.除此之外,这两款处理器的多线程性能几乎相同。您必须考虑 AMD Zen 4 配置才能获得更高的性能。
性能的可持续性只能算一般。例如,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,多线程性能会随着时间的推移下降约 20%,这表明 Turbo Boost 速度正在减慢。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (6720 - 8270, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (33777 - 41487, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (1754 - 2216, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (67557 - 69991, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (4589 - 5145, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (16808 - 20668, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (34968 - 41413, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (519 - 650, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (3513 - 4367, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (37846 - 43780, n=4) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
系统性能
由于英特尔机型的 CPU 多线程性能和集成 GPU 性能较慢,PCMark 生产力和数字内容创建子测试结果远远落后于基于 AMD 的 ThinkPad T14s G4。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5690 - 5980, n=4) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10635 - 11827, n=4) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7206 - 7708, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6392 - 6735, n=4) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1605 - 1675, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1582 - 1650, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1713 - 1797, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1373 - 1427, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5980 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (57654 - 69736, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (49203 - 54068, n=4) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (70434 - 85570, n=4) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (90.2 - 102.2, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备包括 512 GB Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV512G承诺的连续读写速度分别高达 7000 MB/s 和 5000 MB/s。我们设备中的硬盘确实可以达到 7000 MB/s,但如下文 DiskSpd 循环结果所示,这一速度只能持续一两分钟,然后就开始下降到 5000 MB/s 的范围。相比之下,ThinkPad T14s G4 AMD 版中的三星 PM9A1a 在较长时间内保持最高速度不成问题。我们怀疑 Kioxia 控制器达到温度上限的速度比 Samsung 快。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
鸢尾花 Iris Xe 96 EUs该升级了,因为它已经落后于 AMD 近期推出的替代产品。Radeon 780MRadeon 780MAMD 版 ThinkPad 14s G4 中的 Radeon 780M 可将性能提高 40% 至 60%,这绝不是微不足道的。降级到酷睿 i5-1335U 配置和 Iris Xe 80 EUs而不是 Iris Xe 96 EU,图形性能将受到 25% 至 30% 的影响。
有趣的是,如下表 3DMark 11 结果所示,电池供电、平衡模式和性能模式下的整体性能基本相同。
电源配置文件 | 物理分数 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
电池电量 | 13557 | 6293 | 6359 |
平衡 | 12255 | 6424 | 6148 |
绩效 | 12580 | 6403 | 6268 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6896 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20934 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4823 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1774 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.6 - 44.7, n=17) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13 - 25.9, n=42) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (35.9 - 59.8, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22.3 - 33.1, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
开 Witcher 3显示性能稳定,只有一次帧速率会暂时下降到个位数。幸运的是,这种不一致性无法重复出现。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 103.3 | 89.6 | 10.1 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 85.5 | 55.7 | 30.2 | 14.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101.6 | 77.7 | 61.6 | 54.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 42.8 | 23.9 | 17.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.2 | 36.4 | 31.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 29 | 27 | 25 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 89.3 | 38.2 | 30.8 | 24.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 17.8 | |||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 27.1 | |||
F1 22 (2022) | 46 | 41.3 | 30.4 | 22.9 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音,或者更确切地说,没有风扇噪音,是 ThinkPad T14s G4 的一大优点。尤其是当负载要求较高时,我们的英特尔设备运行时比 AMD 配置略微安静。换句话说,在需要更高转速之前,内部风扇可以保持更长时间的安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 24.3 / 35.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | -4% | 3% | 1% | -15% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.6 -6% | 23 1% | 22.9 1% | 22.8 2% | 24.9 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 24.6 -6% | 23 1% | 22.9 1% | 22.8 2% | 24.9 -7% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 24.6 -6% | 23 1% | 22.9 1% | 22.8 2% | 24.9 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 26 -10% | 24.9 -6% | 22.9 3% | 22.8 3% | 24.9 -6% |
Load Average * | 24.3 | 29.8 -23% | 26.1 -7% | 24.3 -0% | 26.3 -8% | 33 -36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.7 | 36.1 -1% | 38.4 -8% | 32.4 9% | 30 16% | |
Load Maximum * | 35.7 | 39.2 -10% | 38.5 -8% | 33.9 5% | 38.3 -7% | 45 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在运行苛刻负载时,顶部和底部(C 盖和 D 盖)的表面温度最高可达 40 摄氏度,与我们在 AMD 版本上记录的情况类似。发热点位于远离掌托和许多常用键盘按键的背面。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -12% | -18% | -10% | -39% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.8 | 42.1 -6% | 41.5 -4% | 45.4 -14% | 39 2% | 48.8 -23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.2 | 39.7 -13% | 43 -22% | 50.6 -44% | 40.6 -15% | 56.5 -61% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.6 | 23 10% | 27.8 -9% | 26.8 -5% | 28 -9% | 33.3 -30% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.4 | 22.8 7% | 27.8 -14% | 26.8 -10% | 28.8 -18% | 35 -43% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会升至 3.8 GHz、53 W 和 100 C。不过,大约 10 秒钟后,CPU 会降至 2.5 GHz 和 23 W,以保持 77 C 的核心温度。这种短暂的 Turbo Boost 潜能在搭载 U 系列处理器的超极本中很常见,与我们上述的 CineBench R15 xT 结果一致。
运行时的核心温度 Witcher 3时的核心温度稳定在 73 摄氏度,而最近的 Pavilion Plus 14的温度为 77 摄氏度。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 38 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.5 | -- | 77 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.6 | 71 | 750 |
Witcher 3 压力 | ~2.2 | 1250 | 73 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
我们的英特尔系统在台式机上空转时比 AMD 系统略高几瓦。将这种情况延长几个小时,微小的差异就会增加,下一节的电池寿命结果就是例证。
由于酷睿系列的 Turbo Boost 潜能普遍较高,因此在启动 CPU 密集型任务时,英特尔设备的功耗要比 AMD 设备高得多。不过,功率峰值只会持续几秒钟,然后英特尔和 AMD 机型的功耗就会趋于正常,如下图所示。
每瓦性能显然对 AMD 有利。运行 Witcher 3或 Prime95,在考虑节流因素后,两款机型的要求大致相同,但 AMD Ryzen 7 配置的多线程 CPU 性能和图形性能明显快于英特尔酷睿 i7 配置。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.42 Watt |
Idle | 3.1 / 6.5 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
40 / 69 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G, IPS-AHVA LTPS wLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 20% | 16% | -11% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 2.7 13% | 2.4 23% | 3.2 -3% | 4.5 -45% | 4.9 -58% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 5.2 20% | 4.5 31% | 5.1 22% | 6.5 -0% | 12.5 -92% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 5.6 29% | 5.6 29% | 5.4 32% | 7.3 8% | 16.8 -113% |
Load Average * | 40 | 40.1 -0% | 29.5 26% | 39.1 2% | 52.5 -31% | 43.8 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 40.2 7% | 40.8 6% | 39.8 8% | 46.2 -7% | 41.2 5% |
Load Maximum * | 69 | 48.3 30% | 67.2 3% | 46.6 32% | 63 9% | 68.1 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管电池容量相同,但 WLAN 运行时间明显比 AMD 型号短几个小时。我们可以记录近 8 小时的实际浏览时间,而 AMD 版则超过 13 小时。 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10或 Latitude 7440.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52.5 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 67% | 40% | 64% | 64% | 29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 476 | 793 67% | 666 40% | 779 64% | 781 64% | 614 29% |
H.264 | 988 | 760 | 606 | |||
Load | 99 | 94 | 81 | 164 | 135 | |
Reader / Idle | 1427 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - AMD 的激烈竞争
酷睿 i7 vPro ThinkPad T14s G4 是目前最快的英特尔配置,但仍然比便宜的 Ryzen 7 Pro 配置在多线程 CPU 性能和图形性能方面都要慢一些。不仅如此,尽管整体性能较慢,但电池续航时间实际上比 AMD 方案更短。仅凭这些缺点,我们更倾向于推荐 AMD Ryzen 7 配置,它的售价为 1200 美元,比我们的酷睿 i7 评测配置(配备相同的 16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和 1200p IPS 触摸屏)低 200 美元。
无论如何,酷睿 i7 ThinkPad T14s G4 并不可怕。相反,英特尔 U 系列处理器在性能上要逊色于 AMD Zen 4 处理器,尤其是 Ryzen 7 7840U。
英特尔 U 系列处理器支持 Thunderbolt 技术,而 AMD U 系列处理器则配备了 USB4 接口,可支持大多数 Thunderbolt 设备,如 eGPU 和显示器。因此,对于绝大多数用户来说,选择英特尔而不是 AMD 的好处微乎其微。用户可以选择 Ryzen 7 设备,然后配置 WAN 或智能卡等其他辅助选件,这样可以省钱或获得更多实惠。
价格和供应情况
目前,联想已经推出了多种配置的ThinkPad T14,英特尔配置的起价为1110美元,AMD配置的起价为920美元。我们的英特尔酷睿 i7 配置售价约为 1400 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
-
11/22/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.