Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

AMD Vega 11

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11是在2018年初推出的Ryzen桌面APU(Ryzen 5 2400G)中的集成GPU。该显卡基于Vega架构(第5代GCN)并具有11个CU(= 704个着色器)时钟频率高达1240 MHz(Ryzen 5 2400G)。 GPU性能会受益于快速双通道DDR4-2400 RAM(DDR4-2133可能会情况不同)。

Vega架构相对于Polaris一代有了一些改进,现在支持DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1。我们有关Raven Ridge架构的专门文章中提供了更多信息。

根据AMD发布的第一个3DMark Fire Strike跑分,Vega 11有着与旧款Radeon R9 M280X相当的理论性能。然而,在游戏中,专用图形存储器的缺少可能会是瓶颈。因此,现代硬件要求苛刻的游戏只能在最低的设置下运行,APU主要可以用于硬件要求较低的游戏,如Overwatch,Dota 2等

由于14nm工艺和巧妙的省电功能,功耗相对较低。然而,与具有15瓦TDP的移动APU相比,APU的高TDP(65W)应该会有更高的功耗。

AMD Radeon RX Vega Series
RX Vega 64 4096 @ 1.63 GHz2048 Bit @ 945 MHz
RX Vega 56 3584 @ 1.14 - 1.47 GHz409.6 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vega Mobile 1792 2048 Bit
Vega M GH 1536 @ 1.06 - 1.19 GHz
Vega M GL / 870 1280 @ 0.93 - 1.01 GHz
WX Vega M GL 1280 @ 0.93 - 1.01 GHz
Vega 11 704 @ 1.24 GHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines704 - unified
Core Speed1240 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1
Power Consumption65 Watt
Transistor Count4.5 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement26.10.2017
CPU in Vega 11GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G4 x 3600 MHz, 65 W? MHz1250 MHz
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U4 x 2300 MHz, 15 W? MHz1400 MHz
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H4 x 3300 MHz, 35 W? MHz1300 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1250 - 1400 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10.1 pt (11%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -90%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X -2%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 1%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 5%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 886     avg: 1075     median: 1127 (6%)     max: 1212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 786     avg: 936     median: 935.5 (4%)     max: 1085 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -88%
...
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs -20%
AMD Radeon 540X -15%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) -15%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) -14%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 -12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon Pro 450 2%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P520 7%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X 8%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) 12%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 149941     avg: 160025     median: 157382 (21%)     max: 175397 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 69751     avg: 87099     median: 87098.5 (12%)     max: 104446 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 13263     avg: 14436     median: 14579 (18%)     max: 15323 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 17047     avg: 20261     median: 20847.5 (8%)     max: 22303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2219     avg: 2934     median: 3038.5 (8%)     max: 3264 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3476     avg: 3523     median: 3494 (7%)     max: 3599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 88177     avg: 108334     median: 108334 (14%)     max: 128491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
8516 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
9324 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4277     avg: 5210     median: 5350 (11%)     max: 5635 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4337     avg: 5213     median: 5483 (8%)     max: 5549 Points
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M -5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M -2%
AMD Radeon Pro 555 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 1%
AMD Radeon Pro 560 2%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) 3%
AMD Radeon Pro 455 3%
AMD FirePro M6100 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
20608 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 10880     avg: 11001     median: 11001 (47%)     max: 11122 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 59.7     avg: 65     median: 65 (24%)     max: 70.3 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 80.1     avg: 80.2     median: 80.1 (22%)     max: 80.4 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 447     avg: 465     median: 465 (2%)     max: 483 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1019     avg: 1074     median: 1074 (2%)     max: 1129 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 3392     avg: 3425     median: 3425 (7%)     max: 3458 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.7     avg: 89.3     median: 89.3 (14%)     max: 99.9 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 63.1     avg: 76.1     median: 74.7 (10%)     max: 90.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
90.5 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 Points per Watt (0%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1240 MHz (62%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1240 MHz (49%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
38.1 56.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.3 21.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.2 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2 8.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
37.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
121.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
28 fps 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 fps 21 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13 fps 19 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 fps 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
64.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
39.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
79.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.9 66.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.9 30.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.1 26.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 25.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.4 8.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
125.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
44.5 44.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.2 24.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare