Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5050 Laptop是 Blackwell 系列笔记本专用显卡,由 Team Green 于 2025 年 6 月推出。它使用的是 GB207 芯片。

与 RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 一样,该 GPU 提供 2,560 个统一着色器(CUDA 内核)和 128 位内存总线,可支持 8 GB GDDR7 显存。

GPU 的其他特性包括原生第五代光线追踪内核、PCIe 5 支持、DisplayPort 2.1a 和 440 TOPS AI 性能(得益于内置的张量内核)。

无 DLSS 帧生成的性能应与旧版 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU笔记本电脑 GPU。在 3DMark 测试中,RTX 5060 在 115 W(包括动态提升)的情况下速度快 21 - 22%(通过Videocardz)。).与往常一样,性能在很大程度上取决于功耗(TGP)和散热。因此,笔记本电脑中也会有明显较慢的型号。

该芯片由台积电公司(TSMC)采用 4 纳米工艺(4N)生产。功耗(TGP)规定为 35-100 瓦(115 瓦,包括动态提升 2.0)。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X2
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines2560 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
Core Speed1020 - 2662 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU440 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 2.5 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed14000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth224 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2
Power Consumption100 Watt (35 - 100 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9.5 pt (29%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -99%
...
7.75 -19%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7.81 -18%
7.97 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
8.01 -16%
8.24 -13%
8.62 -9%
8.8 -7%
AMD Radeon 8050S
8.8 -7%
9.03 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
9.51
9.52 0%
9.53 0%
9.53 0%
9.57 1%
9.61 1%
9.69 2%
9.92 4%
9.93 4%
10.2 7%
...
19 100%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 250%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2317     avg: 2391     median: 2390.5 (16%)     max: 2464 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1654     avg: 1814     median: 1743 (12%)     max: 2046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 7369     avg: 7470     median: 7470 (17%)     max: 7571 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18022     avg: 22054     median: 22488 (34%)     max: 24807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 20726     avg: 24995     median: 25400 (23%)     max: 28040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 294938     avg: 350515     median: 320131 (35%)     max: 436477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7561     avg: 9056     median: 9277.5 (24%)     max: 10231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7166     avg: 9020     median: 9162 (19%)     max: 9828 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
8057 -11%
8189 -9%
8210 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8238 -9%
8316 -8%
8689 -4%
8700 -4%
8798 -2%
8989 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
9020
9033 0%
9097 1%
9164 2%
9300 3%
9332 3%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
9448 5%
AMD Radeon 8050S
9502 5%
9652 7%
9770 8%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 158%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 397%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 46342     avg: 52654     median: 50444 (48%)     max: 65174 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 100222     avg: 126908     median: 124768 (31%)     max: 149542 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 20180     avg: 25043     median: 25519 (31%)     max: 29009 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 21841     avg: 29975     median: 31191 (24%)     max: 33119 Points
171.8 -99%
...
26816 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27104 -10%
27852 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28106 -6%
28461 -5%
28692 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29416 -2%
29447 -2%
29663 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
29975
30499 2%
31142 4%
32331 8%
32662 9%
32846 10%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
32846 10%
33169 11%
33497 12%
34188 14%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 128%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 333%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
76534 Points (22%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
82905 Points (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
47989 Points (63%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 49     avg: 67.7     median: 50.5 (7%)     max: 214 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 24     avg: 51.6     median: 29 (11%)     max: 242 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
15349 points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
135.1 fps (44%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 142     avg: 197     median: 204 (12%)     max: 261 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
100.4 fps (38%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
232.1 fps (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
609 fps (45%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 96.9     avg: 225.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 836 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 82706     avg: 90526     median: 91426.5 (23%)     max: 96388 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 73365     avg: 78681     median: 78681 (20%)     max: 83997 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
5328 Samples/s (19%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
11437 Samples/s (20%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
20725 points (17%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 83.8     avg: 109.2     median: 112.1 (15%)     max: 150.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 90.3     avg: 121.7     median: 117.5 (33%)     max: 173.4 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 89.6     avg: 120.7     median: 115.9 (15%)     max: 171.9 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.319     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.633 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
med. 1920x1080
87 101 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70 75 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
med. 1920x1080
56 65.4 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.7 47.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 23.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
81 81.7 89.8 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.5 68.7 71.5 85.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.5 48.3 49.2 58.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.8 65 77.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.1 52.2 60 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.4 26.8 33.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
87.7 93.4 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6 78.3 81.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.9 55.7 58.4 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
35.2 35.7 38.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.7 29.6 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 16.5 17.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
150.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96 128.2 157 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93 101.7 125 132 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 17.1 18 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
34.6
med. 1920x1080
47.1 53.7 58.4 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.5 48.8 52.6 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.8 47.3 51 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
42.6 48.3 52.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.9 45.1 48.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.8 22.9 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
32 51 51 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 42 43 43 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21 29 30 31 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
45.5 48.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.4 44.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.1 32.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
71.9 83.2 90.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.2 67.6 73.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.4 46.8 51.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.1 52.1 58.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6 22.2 30.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Marvel Rivals

Marvel Rivals

2024
low 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
42 46.4 56.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.9 40.2 48 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.8 33.8 39.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
53.3 79.9 79.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.6 54.2 55.8 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.4 41.3 41.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
54.8 79.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.3 75.6 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.8 70.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.4 46.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
40.4 41.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
32.8 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
182.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
47.4 50.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9 35.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
74.1 75.9 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.7 68.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.5 54.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
55.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
72.3 86.2 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.7 64.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.8 62 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
99.3 121.9 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 77.5 80.9 86.4 92 97.5 98.1 98.2 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.6 67.8 73.5 78.8 83.2 83.3 83.4 87.7 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.3 61.3 61.5 64.2 71 73.7 74.6 75.2 76.9 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.9 46.1 47.2 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
42.9 55.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
142.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
24.7
31.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
69.1
65.9
66.3
54.2
59.9
53
66.1
58.6
low 1920x1080
97.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
76.3 89.2 90.4 96.9 101.1 108.4 116.9 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.8 66.1 70.9 75 82.4 86.9 87.3 96.3 101.9 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.4 65.2 68.1 70 80.4 80.7 86.3 93.6 100.5 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60 66.6 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
126.9
high 1920x1080
151  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
336 478 ~ 407 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
185 203 234 256 273 278 ~ 238 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.3 164.8 192.2 207 220 220 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
142.1 154.6 173.4 179.6 189.6 189.7 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
125.8 132 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
98.5 105.6 113.5 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.9 76.2 80.4 88.5 93 94.8 95.7 109.7 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.5 66.9 67.1 77.1 78 80.9 82.4 87.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
166.1 171.2 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.2 105.7 120.2 132.4 139.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.5 86.2 100.4 102 109.5 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.8 73.6 77.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
165 165.7 168.5 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.3 99.5 126.2 137.7 147.9 148.9 152 157.7 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.8 92.1 121.7 131 139.7 141.7 143.3 154.1 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.8 86.5 116.2 119.9 130.7 133 135 144.6 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
178.6 184.4 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
155.1 171.4 171.6 175.1 177.2 179.9 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132.2 162 163.1 163.6 165.7 170.4 175.2 178.5 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.1 93.6 103.4 112.9 117.6 123.6 129.7 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
93.7 95.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
178.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
184.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 7947326
Anno 117: Pax Romana614422
ARC Raiders847350
The Outer Worlds 283.569542921.5
Battlefield 6917856
Borderlands 4372917
F1 25150.8127113175
Doom: The Dark Ages53484631.9
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered48442313.4
Assassin's Creed Shadows45392825
Monster Hunter Wilds474332
Kingdom Come Deliverance 282664736.8
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle59.554239.58
Marvel Rivals8873674832
Stalker 248423429
Until Dawn71534030.4
Space Marine 267656249.5
Star Wars Outlaws46413323.2
F1 24182.2156132.149.933.4
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2493524.2
Ghost of Tsushima75685439.7
Horizon Forbidden West79595845.7
Cyberpunk 207711188786843
Baldur's Gate 397.397817863
Shadow of the Tomb Raider151136
Strange Brigade407238195172129
X-Plane 11.111068976
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1691219670
Dota 2 Reborn166132126119
GTA V18217216411095
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
6

9
14
6
1
12
12
5
8
12
5
2
8
9
3
1



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • acer Nitro V 15.6” FHD IPS 165Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 with 8GB GDDR7 VRAM, Win11H, w/Mouse pad (16GB RAM, 512GB PCIe SSD)
  • acer Nitro V 16 AI WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS 180Hz Gaming Laptop AI PC, AMD Ryzen 5 240 Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 8GB GDDR7 VRAM, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, (16", R5, RTX5050)
  • Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15.6" FHD 144Hz Display, Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD, Wi-Fi 6, Backlit Keyboard, Windows 11 Pro, Luna Grey, w/Mytrix Accessory
  • Lenovo Legion 5i – AI-Powered Gaming Laptop - Intel® Core™ i7-13650HX - 15" 2K WUXGA IPS Display – 4.9GHz – NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5050 – 16GB Memory – 512GB Storage – Eclipse Black
  • Alienware 16 Aurora Gaming Laptop AC16250-16" WQXGA 120Hz Display, Intel Core 7-240H Processor, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 8GB Graphics, Windows 11 Home, Onsite Service - Blue

v1.35
log 14. 14:46:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 14 Feb 2026 11:43:57 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.013s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12923 +0.036s ... 0.054s

#13 got single benchmarks 12923 +0.041s ... 0.096s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.846s ... 1.942s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.942s

#17 Got 369 rows for game benchmarks. +0.086s ... 2.028s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.028s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.022s ... 2.05s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.36s ... 2.411s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.681s ... 3.092s

#22 return log +0s ... 3.092s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop graphics card

经济实惠的游戏入门机型:宏碁 Nitro V 15 并未给人留下深刻印象

经济实惠的游戏入门机型:宏碁 Nitro V 15 并未给人留下深刻印象

游戏笔记本电脑的价格很快就会达到数千欧元。那些希望控制支出的人可能会发现宏碁的 Nitro V 15 很有吸引力,因为它以相对适中的价格提供了 RTX 5050 GPU。我们将这款 15 英寸游戏笔记本与其前代产品和竞争机型进行了比较。
Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 15.6", 2.1 kg
微星 Cyborg 15 评论:2026 年的完美经济型游戏笔记本电脑?

微星 Cyborg 15 评论:2026 年的完美经济型游戏笔记本电脑?

微星推出的 Cyborg 是一款令人兴奋的 15 英寸笔记本电脑,售价在 1000 欧元(约合 1180 美元)左右,主要面向注重价格的游戏玩家。我们详细了解了这款 RTX 5050 设备,并发现了一些惊喜。
Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 15.6", 2.2 kg
配备 RTX 5050 的宏碁 Nitro V14 AI 评测

配备 RTX 5050 的宏碁 Nitro V14 AI 评论:电池续航时间出色的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Nitro V14 AI 从众多游戏笔记本电脑中脱颖而出,不仅是因为它的配色,还因为它的小尺寸。在我们的评测中,您会发现它的性能是否仍然令人信服,还是不得不做出太多妥协。
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 14.5", 1.7 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 评测:并非最佳配置

联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 评测:并非最佳配置

GeForce RTX 5050 显卡的 Yoga Pro 9 16 比更昂贵的 RTX 5060 或 5070 显卡更便宜、更凉爽、更安静。遗憾的是,该系统的零售价接近 1800 美元,并不比高端配置便宜多少。
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 16", 2 kg
宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 评测

宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 评测:经济实惠、电池续航时间长的游戏笔记本电脑

如果您正在寻找一款配备现代显卡的游戏笔记本电脑,而又不想花冤枉钱,宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 可能正好符合您的要求。我们在这篇评测中详细介绍了这款配备 AMD Ryzen 5 240 和 RTX 5050 图形处理器的 16 英寸机型,并解释了它的优缺点。
AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 16", 2.4 kg

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng: Intel Core i5-13420H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » 1200 美元的预算玩家:惠普 Victus 15 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑评测

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758: Intel Core 5 210H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 评测:评估 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑作为中低端 GPU 的价值

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10, RTX 5050: AMD Ryzen 5 220, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10, RTX 5050

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860: AMD Ryzen 5 240, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860

MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG: Intel Core 7 240H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG

Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-41 : AMD Ryzen 5 240, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-41

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 FA608UH

Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5050: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5050

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10, Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10, Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WEK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 HX B14WEK

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA63H: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA63H

Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-52: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-52

LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 17.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UH

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHR

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHV: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JH

Asus V16 V3607VH: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VH

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Core Ultra 9 285H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H 相比几乎没有任何优势

   » 比较联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 的三种主要配置

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P520
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Vega 9
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-07- 1)