联想ThinkBook 13x G1的回顾。具有良好电池寿命的超薄笔记本

Name: Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE
Brand: Lenovo

16:10的格式。 联想ThinkBook 13x G1应该能够为繁忙的办公室日常工作提供足够的性能，也是移动用户的一个不错的选择。我们将在审查中了解这些功能的实现情况。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 11/02/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Tiger Lake Thunderbolt ThinkPad Laptop / Notebook

联想的ThinkBook 13x G1是一款小而薄的笔记本，应该很适合移动工作。与之相比 ThinkPad X13 G2，一些商务功能被省略了，但约1460欧元（约1688美元）的价格也稍低。为此，有一个节能的英特尔酷睿i7-1160G7，16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE (ThinkBook 13x Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1160G7 4 x 2.1 - 4.4 GHz, 40 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP4

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Memory

16 GB

, Dual-Channel

Display

13.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, LP133WQ1-SPH1, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP4 PCH-LP

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB

, 430 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 12.9 x 298 x 209

Battery

56 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, power supply, wireless mouse, hdmi-/vga-to-usb-c-adapter, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.116 kg, Power Supply: 325 g

Price

1460 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.3 %	11/2021	Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.1 kg	12.9 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
84.4 %	08/2021	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8	953 g	17 mm	13.30"	1920x1200
85.6 %	09/2021	Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1 kg	17 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
88.3 %	06/2021	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	14.8 mm	13.40"	3456x2160

案例 - 稳定而纤细的联想笔记本

联想用铝制造ThinkBook 13x的外壳，盖子和底座都是用铝制造的。因此，这款笔记本电脑非常稳定，而且相当轻，重量约为1.1公斤（约2.4磅）。显示屏可以向后折叠180°，并在每个设定的位置被铰链牢牢固定。制造质量非常好，没有不均匀的凸起边缘或类似的情况。

Size comparison

Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 两个雷电4和可交换的固态硬盘

ThinkBook 13x提供了两个Thunderbolt 4端口，包括DisplayPort功能，可以用相应的适配器来创建许多其他端口。一个组合插孔端口可用于连接耳机。

沟通

对于无线通信，联想的笔记本可以依靠蓝牙5.2和WiFi 6。后者在与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12结合使用时，能够实现非常好的速度，平均传输速度为1,428 MBit/s，接收数据时为1,646 MBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1450 (1258^min - 1519^max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1428 (1322^min - 1501^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -19%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	661 (550^min - 752^max) MBit/s -54%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	617 (220^min - 685^max) MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1646 (837^min - 1707^max) MBit/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1555 (1374^min - 1656^max) MBit/s -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1368 (681^min - 1483^max) MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s -23%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	849 (770^min - 905^max) MBit/s -48%

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1617 (837-1707)

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1428 (1322-1501)

网络摄像头

联想在ThinkBook 13x上只安装了一个低分辨率的90万像素网络摄像头。这使得即使在环境光线良好的情况下，主体看起来也很模糊，颜色对比度也很低。

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE: 8.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 12.69 ∆E

安全问题

联想笔记本电脑的网络摄像头可以用机械快门关闭，集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器可用于解锁笔记本。在我们的测试中，这总是可靠地工作。

辅料

除了笔记本本身，供货范围还包括一个带USB-C接口的65瓦电源，一个蓝牙鼠标和一个VGA/HDMI转USB-C适配器。其他配件，如合适的手提箱，也可以从联想购买。

维护

在卸下所有可见的螺丝后，ThinkBook 13x的底板可以小心翼翼地取出来。固态硬盘可以在里面更换，但内存和其他组件是焊接的。

担保

联想为ThinkBook 13x提供的保修期为12个月。

输入设备--推荐给经常写作的人

键盘

ThinkBook 13x的键盘提供了一个明显的压力点，很适合书写较长的文字。分开的回车键和小的方向键需要一些时间来适应。尽管采用了狭窄的布局和辅助布局，但特殊按键也很容易触及。

触摸板

联想使用点击板作为鼠标的替代品，这很适合导航鼠标指针。通过触摸以及机械压力触发的鼠标点击被可靠地登记。

显示屏 - 明亮且色彩丰富，但有反光

ThinkBook 13x G1的屏幕由13.3英寸的IPS面板组成，分辨率为2,560 x 1,600像素。最大亮度处于较高水平，平均为441 cd/m²，90%的照度也可以被评为良好。然而，竞争对手的后一个数值要好一些。

PWM没有用于亮度控制，这对眼睛敏感的人来说是有利的。


424 cd/m²	439 cd/m²	437 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	472 cd/m²	446 cd/m²
434 cd/m²	444 cd/m²	442 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP133WQ1-SPH1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 441.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: 1686:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE LP133WQ1-SPH1, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AU Optronics AUO6496, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30	Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE LQ133M1JW48, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Display		4%	-2%	27%
Display P3 Coverage	69	73.4 6%	67.3 -2%	99.7 44%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.8 0%	98.4 -1%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.8	74.8 6%	68.8 -3%	97.7 38%
Response Times		1%	-29%	94%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	48.4 ?(21.6, 26.8)	42.4 ?(22.4, 20) 12%	61.2 ?(32, 29.2) -26%	2.2 ?(1.2, 1) 95%
Response Time Black / White *	28.8 ?(14, 14.8)	31.6 ?(17.6, 14) -10%	37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8) -31%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 92%
PWM Frequency			211.9 ?(30)	240.4 ?(51)
Screen		-37%	-51%	-115%
Brightness middle	472	473.9 0%	348 -26%	384 -19%
Brightness	441	458 4%	350 -21%	387 -12%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	92 2%	97 8%
Black Level *	0.28	0.36 -29%	0.31 -11%
Contrast	1686	1316 -22%	1123 -33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	2.99 -76%	2.8 -65%	4.56 -168%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	4.35 -61%	6.8 -152%	7.27 -169%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.8	1.1 -38%	0.8 -0%	4.52 -465%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.9	4 -111%	4.8 -153%	1.5 21%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.35 ^94%	2.2 ^100%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6363 ^102%	6269 ^104%	6978 ^93%	6219 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)				100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -23%	-27% / -37%	2% / -45%

* ... smaller is better

ThinkBook 13x的屏幕对比度为1,686:1，黑值为0.28 cd/m²，显示出清晰的色彩和深邃的黑色。色彩空间覆盖率非常好，有99.7%（sRGB）、70.8%（AdobeRGB）和69%（P3）。

CalMAN分析还显示，颜色的显示已经具有非常低的DeltaE2000偏差，出厂时为1.9。通过校准，这一数值仍可提高到0.8。相应的ICC文件可以在屏幕照度图形旁边的右上方窗口中下载。

ThinkBook 13x只能在户外有限地使用。光滑的显示屏表面会因反射而导致失真，这在室内也会发生，例如由于不利的人工照明。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.6 ms rise
48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

ThinkBook 13x的IPS面板的视角非常稳定。几乎可以从任何角度观看图像内容，而不会变形或显示出扭曲的色彩。

性能 - 在繁忙的日常生活中表现良好

联想为ThinkBook 13x G1设计了办公应用的移动工作。根据所选的CPU，这些也可以有更高的要求。大容量存储配置也是可变的。除了英特尔酷睿i7-1160G7，目前还有一款英特尔酷睿i5-1130G7，而不是像我们的测试配置那样的512GB，联想笔记本电脑还可以使用1TB的固态硬盘。

处理器

ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-1160G7安装在测试单元中的处理器有四个核心，可以同时处理八个任务。时钟频率在2.1和4.4GHz之间，据此，冷却和设定的TDP也是可用性能的原因。虽然它实际上是一个更高效的Tiger-Lake UP4芯片，但TDP值设置得很慷慨，长期值为20瓦，短期值为40瓦。

在我们的Cinebench R15耐力测试中，i7-1160G7的性能表现为 i7-1160G7的性能达到了英特尔酷睿i7-1185G7然后下降到一个低15%的值。这一行为也同样适用于 i7-1185G7也是如此。在电池模式下，Cinebench R15多分数从770分下降到378分。

单一基准测试的结果也将ThinkBook 13x置于与英特尔直接竞争的水平上酷睿i7-1185G7.

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø666 (633.84-770.02)

HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1313 (1297.77-1389.66)

Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø672 (651.67-816.61)

Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø695 (607.28-765.86)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)	10289 Points +126%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	7872 (7780.83^min - 7871.73^max) Points +73%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	5013 (4398.92^min - 5012.66^max) Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	4559 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (3008 - 5648, n=4)	4112 Points -10%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	3610 Points -21%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)	1627 Points +20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1457 Points +8%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1415 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	1351 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	1251 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (1079 - 1351, n=3)	1232 Points -9%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)	3963 Points +140%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	3092 Points +88%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1873 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (1224 - 2068, n=4)	1673 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	1648 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	1425 Points -14%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)	610 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	556 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	552 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	528 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (484 - 544, n=4)	514 Points -3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	489 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)	1757 Points +128%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1390 (1297.77^min - 1389.66^max) Points +81%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	817 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (753 - 864, n=4)	812 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	770 (633.84^min - 770.02^max) Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	766 (607.28^min - 765.86^max) Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)	237 Points +15%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	229 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	221 Points +7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	210.7 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	206 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (170 - 208, n=4)	194.8 Points -5%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	921 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (625 - 1115, n=4)	890 Seconds * +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	699 Seconds * +24%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	637 Seconds * +31%
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)	386 Seconds * +58%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	331 Seconds * +64%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years)	44459 MIPS +167%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	43633 MIPS +162%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	19937 MIPS +20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	18812 MIPS +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (15740 - 22305, n=4)	18014 MIPS +8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	16672 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	5405 MIPS +22%
Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)	5328 MIPS +20%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	4894 MIPS +10%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (4448 - 4621, n=3)	4555 MIPS +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	4448 MIPS
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	3678 MIPS -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)	9084 Points +73%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	5771 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	5258 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	5209 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (4660 - 5258, n=4)	4938 Points -6%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)	1701 Points +15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1541 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	1484 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	1463 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (1406 - 1484, n=4)	1441 Points -3%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years)	11.9 fps +208%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	10.4 fps +169%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	6.34 fps +64%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	5.39 fps +40%
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (3.75 - 6.06, n=4)	4.48 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	3.86 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	55.9 s *
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (49.8 - 61.3, n=4)	54.9 s * +2%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	53.9 s * +4%
Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years)	52.6 s * +6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	51 s * +9%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	43.2 s * +23%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (0.64 - 0.76, n=4)	0.679 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7	0.67 sec *
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7	0.605 sec * +10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	0.594 sec * +11%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	0.54 sec * +19%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years)	0.52 sec * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

770 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

99.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

206 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

在评估系统性能的PCMark 10测试中，联想ThinkBook 13x G1相对于英特尔酷睿i1160G7取得了不错的成绩。英特尔酷睿i7-1160G7一个略高于平均水平的结果，但在我们的测试领域只能确保最后的位置。

在日常使用中，该系统始终运行顺畅，没有表现出任何微颤动或类似情况。访问文件和启动程序也可以在任何时候没有延迟。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)	5879 Points +22%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5872 Points +22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5226 Points +9%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	4899 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4813 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4554 - 4813, n=4)	4656 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	10492 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)	10247 Points +4%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	10046 Points +2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	9954 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9883 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9482 - 10372, n=4)	9868 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9089 Points +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)	7857 Points +22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	6964 Points +8%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	6610 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6447 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6155 - 6602, n=4)	6354 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)	6923 Points +46%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6020 Points +27%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5304 Points +12%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	4852 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4748 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (3744 - 4748, n=4)	4387 Points -8%

PCMark 10 Score		4813 points
Help

DPC延迟

在使用LatencyMon的测试中，ThinkBook 13x G1显示中断时间增加。因此，在我们的测试配置中，它不适合于实时应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1401 μs *
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	1059 μs * +24%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	903 μs * +36%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	770 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

联想在ThinkBook 13x的测试机型中安装了一块三星的512GB固态硬盘，它已经支持快速的PCIe 4.0标准。它实现了良好的读写速率，但比其他采用这种大容量存储的笔记本要慢一些。与我们的测试领域相比，该速率处于中等水平。

与其他大容量存储设备的比较结果如何，可以在我们的硬盘/SSD基准列表.

	Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-14%	5%	0%	70%
Write 4K	149.9	128.3 -14%	114.8 -23%	156.8 5%	182.8 ?(122.4 - 237, n=30) 22%
Read 4K	78.7	50.9 -35%	49.53 -37%	39.66 -50%	77 ?(47.3 - 92, n=30) -2%
Write Seq	2661	971 -64%	1833 -31%	854 -68%	3119 ?(1056 - 4456, n=21) 17%
Read Seq	1249	1540 23%	2260 81%	2167 73%	3360 ?(1249 - 4560, n=21) 169%
Write 4K Q32T1	320.7	538 68%	323.5 1%	441.1 38%	464 ?(277 - 710, n=30) 45%
Read 4K Q32T1	408.6	344.4 -16%	340.5 -17%	395.5 -3%	566 ?(293 - 940, n=30) 39%
Write Seq Q32T1	3955	980 -75%	3048 -23%	858 -78%	4450 ?(1148 - 5123, n=30) 13%
Read Seq Q32T1	1770	1829 3%	3282 85%	3258 84%	6333 ?(1770 - 6867, n=30) 258%
AS SSD		-103%	-37%	-36%	19%
Seq Read	4332	1616 -63%	2622 -39%	2694 -38%	4658 ?(2629 - 5546, n=38) 8%
Seq Write	1558	761 -51%	1322 -15%	1407 -10%	2766 ?(1108 - 3925, n=38) 78%
4K Read	73.5	46.87 -36%	48.36 -34%	54.4 -26%	67.8 ?(39.2 - 85.1, n=38) -8%
4K Write	193.3	126.6 -35%	121.1 -37%	195.8 1%	174.9 ?(105.4 - 216, n=38) -10%
4K-64 Read	959	324.6 -66%	765 -20%	1092 14%	1566 ?(533 - 2783, n=38) 63%
4K-64 Write	1604	815 -49%	1343 -16%	1269 -21%	2393 ?(1010 - 3480, n=38) 49%
Access Time Read *	0.034	0.074 -118%	0.074 -118%	0.064 -88%	0.048 ?(0.023 - 0.089, n=37) -41%
Access Time Write *	0.021	0.135 -543%	0.033 -57%	0.062 -195%	0.03368 ?(0.02 - 0.076, n=38) -60%
Score Read	1466	533 -64%	1076 -27%	1416 -3%	2099 ?(1079 - 3224, n=38) 43%
Score Write	1953	1018 -48%	1596 -18%	1606 -18%	2819 ?(1258 - 4036, n=38) 44%
Score Total	4050	1798 -56%	3169 -22%	3692 -9%	5933 ?(3573 - 8620, n=38) 46%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-59% / -65%	-16% / -19%	-18% / -21%	45% / 41%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1770 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3955 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 408.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 320.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1249 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2661 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 149.9 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

对于图像内容的显示，内部图形单元 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs负责。它适用于对图形性能有低到中等要求的应用，例如，简单的照片编辑。它还得益于工作存储器的双通道配置，因为它在这里使用。

在3DMark测试中，ThinkBook 13x取得了平均成绩，可以在我们的测试领域处于中间位置。由于UP4处理器的iGPU时钟速度稍慢，普通UP3 CPU的图形单元（如酷睿i7-1165G7或 i7-1185G7)的速度稍快一些。在电池供电时，Fire Strike 图形得分保持不变。

在我们的GPU基准列表中，我们已经列出了与此相比，其他图形单元可以预期的情况。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)	8227 Points +38%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	7045 Points +18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	6647 Points +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7471, n=194)	6345 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	5983 Points
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	5842 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years)	29386 Points +11%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	28496 Points +8%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	27008 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	26390 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38040, n=172)	26334 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	24591 Points -7%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)	6026 Points +22%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	5332 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	5191 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	4953 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6143, n=207)	4905 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	3399 Points -31%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years)	2027 Points +40%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	1642 Points +13%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=204)	1494 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	1447 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	1382 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1128 Points -22%

3DMark 11 Performance		6391 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		15841 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4370 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1602 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

联想ThinkBook 13x G1只适用于对图形性能要求不高的游戏或较老的游戏。即使在这里，为了获得流畅的游戏体验，可能仍然需要降低细节水平和分辨率。我们对TheWitcher 3 的耐力测试表明，ThinkBook 13x可以在较长时间内保持其图形性能不下降。

在其他游戏中可以预期的性能，可以在我们的GPU游戏列表中看到。

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (29 - 264, n=46, last 2 years)	63.7 fps +19%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.1 (55^min - 66^max) fps +14%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	56 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	53.5 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 74.1, n=180)	53.4 fps 0%

GTA V - 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Subnotebook (31 - 172.6, n=52, last 2 years)	104.1 fps +32%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24.1 - 137, n=158)	82.2 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.7 (10.9^min, 32.3^P1 - 159^max) fps
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	68.7 (11.4^min, 40^P1 - 118^max) fps -13%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 114.4, n=58, last 2 years)	65.9 fps +23%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.2 - 88.1, n=207)	53.8 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	53.5 (24.3^min) fps
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	49.8 (42.7^min) fps -7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.3 (24.3^min) fps -12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.6 (16.9^min) fps -22%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 130.6, n=54, last 2 years)	51.3 fps +22%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43.6 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=175)	39.2 fps -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35 fps -17%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	33.1 fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Subnotebook (20.9 - 116.2, n=55, last 2 years)	39.2 fps +29%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.2 fps +15%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=208)	35.2 fps +15%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.7 fps +10%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	32.8 fps +8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.5 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 126.9, n=55, last 2 years)	48.3 fps +36%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39 fps +10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (18.2 - 48.3, n=159)	36.4 fps +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.6 (12.4^min, 18.1^P1 - 238^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.2 (8.8^min, 17.6^P1 - 182^max) fps -7%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	29.7 (22^min, 26^P1 - 41^max) fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø12.8 (11-14)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	85	78.7	27.7	10.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	82.1	53.5	30.4	12.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	82.5	73.8	53.5	49.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	42	20.7	20.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	37.9	30.5	28.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	76.5	35.6	28.2	22.8

排放 - 办公模式下无声

噪声排放

在负载情况下，ThinkBook 13x的风扇会发出高达34 dB(A)的可闻噪音。这是很均匀的，可以很好地淡化。笔记本在办公和浏览器模式下基本无声。

我们无法确定任何其他背景噪音，如线圈的啸叫或类似的声音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A)
Load		33.9 / 33.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)

温度

在我们的压力测试场景中，联想笔记本的表面加热到了47.5℃（~117.5°F）。在日常使用中，温度明显降低，这意味着ThinkBook 13x可以在任何时候顺利使用。

在我们的长期压力测试中，联想笔记本内部的温度上升到95℃（203°F）。时钟频率经常低于1.2 GHz的基本时钟，然而，冷却系统总是能够在交替的频率下反复临时增加。在测试期间，系统仍然可以运行。由于这样的负载在日常使用中不应该出现，所以没有因为温度过高而受到限制。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38 °C	43.2 °C	39.5 °C
34.7 °C	39 °C	39.6 °C
26 °C	26.3 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 34.8 °C


42.5 °C	47.5 °C	42 °C
38.2 °C	39.8 °C	31.3 °C
27.4 °C	27.9 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 35.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26.7 °C	27 °C	26.9 °C
26.1 °C	26.8 °C	26.4 °C
25 °C	25.1 °C	25.4 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 26.2 °C


27.5 °C	28.6 °C	28.5 °C
27.1 °C	27.6 °C	27 °C
25.6 °C	25.7 °C	25.7 °C

Maximum: 28.6 °C
Average: 27 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


36.2 °C	41.6 °C	39.2 °C
33.5 °C	36 °C	34.7 °C
25.5 °C	25.6 °C	26.5 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


41.9 °C	46.1 °C	39.7 °C
37.7 °C	38.7 °C	30.4 °C
27.5 °C	27.4 °C	26.5 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 35.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).

演讲者

ThinkBook 13x的扬声器提供了良好的音量和相对宽广的声谱。因此，它们适用于在安静的环境中播放媒体内容。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 长时间运行和快速充电能力

能源消耗

在我们的空闲情况下，联想的笔记本显示平均功耗为6.6瓦，因此是一款与竞争对手相当的经济型笔记本。在负载情况下，功耗会短暂上升到43.8瓦，但会稳定在平均33.3瓦的水平。因此，ThinkBook 13x是我们测试领域中最节俭的笔记本。

附带的电源有65瓦的输出，因此足够高了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.63 / 0.78 Watt
Idle	3.3 / 6.6 / 7.5 Watt
Load	33.3 / 43.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30	Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		-9%	-8%	-32%	-44%	-41%
Idle Minimum *	3.3	3.4 -3%	3.5 -6%	5.7 -73%	5.26 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=185) -59%	4.9 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=61, last 2 years) -48%
Idle Average *	6.6	6.9 -5%	6.1 8%	6 9%	8.46 ?(3.8 - 63, n=185) -28%	8.36 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=61, last 2 years) -27%
Idle Maximum *	7.5	8 -7%	7.2 4%	12.3 -64%	10.7 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=185) -43%	10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=61, last 2 years) -39%
Load Average *	33.3	42.6 -28%	39.9 -20%	44.4 -33%	44.8 ?(12.5 - 77.5, n=185) -35%	45.9 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=60, last 2 years) -38%
Witcher 3 ultra *	30.6	35.2 -15%	34.1 -11%	36.5 -19%
Load Maximum *	43.8	43.1 2%	54.9 -25%	47.8 -9%	66.8 ?(30.1 - 118, n=185) -53%	66 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=61, last 2 years) -51%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø30.6 (25.6-36.1)

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø26.8 (19.2-43.9)

电池寿命

在我们的实际WLAN电池测试中，联想ThinkBook 13x G1的运行时间达到了9小时19分钟。这意味着在我们的测试领域，它比其他竞争者持续的时间更长，但13x G1的电池也是对比设备中最大的56Wh。

由于具有快速充电功能，在使用65瓦的电源适配器的情况下，大约一小时后，电池就能再次充电80%。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		9h 19min

	Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8, 43 Wh	Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	559	539 -4%	492 -12%	391 -30%	629 ?(303 - 1144, n=63, last 2 years) 13%

Pros

+ PCIe 4.0和Thunderbolt 4

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 明亮而多彩的16:10显示屏

+ 可锁定的网络摄像头

+ 良好的扬声器

Cons

- 反射式显示器

- 缺乏连接性

- 电池模式下的CPU性能显著降低

结论 - 联想的ThinkBook 13x是移动的，并提供良好的性能

联想ThinkBook 13x G1是一款小型的移动工作设备，看起来非常高质量。尽管光亮的显示屏不必要地阻碍了户外工作，但其制造质量和内部工作原理并不逊于第一印象。然而，由于亮度和色彩还原度都很高，这种情况可以根据使用情况来克服。

只要光面显示屏不是问题，联想ThinkBook 13x G1可以很好地处理日常移动工作。

性能在这个价格区间的竞争者范围内，因此没有理由提出批评。海量存储仍然可以被替换，这也是一个优点，因为在这种超薄设备中有时不再有这种情况。因此，结合体面的输入设备，联想ThinkBook 13x G1是一个吸引人的、坚实的工作设备。

ThinkBook 13x G1的一个不错的替代品是戴尔XPS 13 9310，它的价格稍高，但有更好的显示屏。如果你非常重视CPU的性能，你也应该考虑仔细研究一下惠普Pavilion Aero 13.

价格和可用性

除了我们从Campuspoint借来的东西外，联想ThinkBook 13x G1，例如，在Cyberport有售。.

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE - 2021-10-19 10/19/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

82%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

50 / 75 → 67%

Weight

74 / 20-75 → 97%

Battery

87%

Display

91%

Games Performance

68 / 78 → 88%

Application Performance

84 / 85 → 98%

Temperature

89%

Noise

97%

Audio

89 / 91 → 97%

Camera

31 / 85 → 36%

Average

78%

87%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkBook 13x G1的回顾。具有良好电池寿命的超薄笔记本

Mike Wobker, 2021-11- 2 (Update: 2021-11- 2)

联想ThinkBook 13x G1的回顾。具有良好电池寿命的超薄笔记本

Possible competitors in comparison

案例 - 稳定而纤细的联想笔记本

Size comparison

设备 - 两个雷电4和可交换的固态硬盘

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备--推荐给经常写作的人

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 明亮且色彩丰富，但有反光

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 在繁忙的日常生活中表现良好

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

排放 - 办公模式下无声

噪声排放

温度

演讲者

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G1-20WJ001KGE audio analysis

HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr audio analysis

电源管理 - 长时间运行和快速充电能力

能源消耗

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 联想的ThinkBook 13x是移动的，并提供良好的性能

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare