Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

英伟达™(NVIDIA®)RTX 5000 Ada 代笔记本图形处理器是一款适用于笔记本电脑的专业显卡。它基于消费级 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 GPU配备 9728 个 CUDA 内核、76 个光线追踪内核和 304 个第四代张量内核。RTX 5000 还使用 16 GB 内存和 256 位总线,但内存支持 ECC 错误校正(可选,将内存大小减至 15360MB)。专业 RTX 型号的时钟频率总是略低,因此性能也落后于 RTX 4090 移动版.不过,与 RTX 4090 一样,这取决于笔记本电脑提供的 TDP。根据 Nvidia 的说法,RTX 5000 的配置功率从 80 瓦到 175 瓦不等,性能差异也相应较大。

尽管名称相似,但该 GPU 与较早的 英伟达 Quadro RTX 5000(图灵).

所使用的 AD103 芯片由台积电采用 4N 工艺(5 纳米)制造。

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines9728 - unified
TMUs304
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores76
Tensor / AI Cores304
Core Speed930 - 1680 (Boost) MHz
CacheL2: 64 MB
Memory Speed20000 effective = 2250 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth576 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count76.3 Billion
technology4 nm
PCIe4 x16/x8
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A5500 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 14644     avg: 15317     median: 15316.5 (44%)     max: 15989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14861     avg: 15540     median: 15539.5 (41%)     max: 16218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 26765     avg: 27801     median: 27801 (49%)     max: 28837 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 30422     avg: 33145     median: 33145 (37%)     max: 35868 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 39530     avg: 39552     median: 39552 (55%)     max: 39574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 51771     avg: 53053     median: 53052.5 (46%)     max: 54334 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 21     avg: 22     median: 22 (3%)     max: 23 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (6%)     max: 16 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 201.1     avg: 213.1     median: 213.1 (53%)     max: 225.04 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 291.54     avg: 300.1     median: 300.1 (44%)     max: 308.58 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 153.14     avg: 162.8     median: 162.8 (35%)     max: 172.49 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 132.41     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (34%)     max: 136.68 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 181.58     avg: 185.8     median: 185.8 (51%)     max: 190.08 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 29.61     avg: 30.6     median: 30.5 (27%)     max: 31.48 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 193.92     avg: 198.7     median: 198.7 (79%)     max: 203.54 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 236.39     avg: 252.1     median: 252.1 (42%)     max: 267.81 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 209.31     avg: 218     median: 218 (58%)     max: 226.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 530.43     avg: 541     median: 540.7 (60%)     max: 550.94 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 154.11     avg: 172.2     median: 172.2 (38%)     max: 190.3 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172.6 (36%)     max: 176.21 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 391.57     avg: 408.2     median: 408.2 (46%)     max: 424.73 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 105.16     avg: 107.4     median: 107.4 (35%)     max: 109.73 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 375.06     avg: 386.4     median: 386.4 (56%)     max: 397.76 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 374.43     avg: 391.8     median: 391.8 (44%)     max: 409.2 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 272.05     avg: 275.2     median: 275.2 (48%)     max: 278.36 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
128.1 fps (37%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
307.2 fps (82%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 307.72     avg: 324     median: 324 (63%)     max: 340.35 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 520.25     avg: 537     median: 537.2 (88%)     max: 554.23 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 85.08     avg: 85.7     median: 85.7 (88%)     max: 86.29 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 419.68     avg: 439.8     median: 439.8 (64%)     max: 459.91 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 104.5     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (86%)     max: 109.65 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 133.03     avg: 151.3     median: 151.3 (75%)     max: 169.52 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 122.66     avg: 126.4     median: 126.4 (82%)     max: 130.04 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 161.47     avg: 168.1     median: 168.1 (76%)     max: 174.72 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 129.32     avg: 135     median: 135 (40%)     max: 140.59 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 237     avg: 299.6     median: 299.6 (31%)     max: 362.19 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 36.13     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (35%)     max: 36.81 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 207.19     avg: 224.4     median: 224.4 (37%)     max: 241.7 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 39.61     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (10%)     max: 49.16 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 115.93     avg: 116.2     median: 116.2 (55%)     max: 116.47 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 68.66     avg: 72     median: 72 (47%)     max: 75.33 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 84.87     avg: 91.3     median: 91.3 (38%)     max: 97.75 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 347     avg: 367.5     median: 367.5 (21%)     max: 388 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 742     median: 742.3 (5%)     max: 1380 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 162695     avg: 166244     median: 166244 (48%)     max: 169792 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 124149     avg: 131449     median: 131448 (43%)     max: 138748 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 133     avg: 154.6     median: 154.6 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.7     avg: 158.6     median: 158.6 (22%)     max: 182.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 134     avg: 161.7     median: 161.7 (36%)     max: 189.4 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.8 fps per Watt (82%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (71%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 44.1     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (76%)     max: 51 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
127.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
47.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
20.1
low 1920x1080
172.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
139.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.3  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
87.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
228 232 249 ~ 236 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
218 224 246 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
202 211 217 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.5 86.2 91.1 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.1 60.1 64.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.8 29.6 33.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
294
322
269
low 1920x1080
196.5 220 267.5 ~ 228 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
179.4 202.3 227.7 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.5 152.6 171.7 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124 125 139.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.1 90.1 99.4 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.4 50.9 53.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
110.5 124.9 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.8 122.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.9 107.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100 103.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.2 74.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.2 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
405 411 ~ 408 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
314 337 ~ 326 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
276 306 ~ 291 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
252 283 ~ 268 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
190.6 216 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
105.1 105.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
144 145 158 ~ 149 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
132 134 144 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
127 129 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
119 131 132 ~ 127 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
113 114 129 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
70 72 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
132.8 155.3 175.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.9 133 153.9 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.7 102.4 122.4 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.8 86.2 102.6 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
196.3 196.6 196.9 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.4 165.6 179.9 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.4 132.5 149.1 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.8 103.8 120 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60.4 63.2 68.7 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
169.4 178 211 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
149.2 161.7 191.7 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150.1 154 188.2 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139.9 144 166.7 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
130 142.5 157.3 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
411.3 412.7 510.5 ~ 445 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
329.6 351.2 430.3 ~ 370 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
256 258.7 298.1 ~ 271 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137 137.6 156.5 ~ 144 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
97 103.9 105.2 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
179.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
175.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
106.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
108  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
55.3
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
179.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
184.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty125116.694.6108.563.728.8
Baldur's Gate 3172.3155.2139.2134.6100.553.3
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart11893.969.454.543.433.3
Returnal989490816034
F1 22236229210876031
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands2282031571299251
Cyberpunk 2077 1.61181151061027035
Strange Brigade408326291268203105
Far Cry 514913713112711971
X-Plane 11.1115513410588
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark19717013610864
Dota 2 Reborn186168164150143
The Witcher 3445370271144102
GTA V185.4179.7175.3117.1106.6108
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
11


4
10


5
9

1
5
6

1
9
1
1
6
6
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 07:01:09

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.065s ... 0.066s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.067s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.067s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.067s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.068s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.068s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.069s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.069s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.069s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11597 +0.015s ... 0.084s

#13 got single benchmarks 11597 +0.023s ... 0.107s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.437s ... 0.545s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.552s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.349s ... 0.901s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.901s

#19 Got 165 rows for game benchmarks. +0.08s ... 0.981s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.981s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.993s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.963s ... 1.956s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.96s

#24 return log +0s ... 1.96s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)