Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

采用Max-Q设计的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti是基于Turing架构(TU116芯片)的笔记本电脑移动图形卡。它专为轻薄型笔记本电脑而设计,比笔记本电脑的常规GTX 1660 Ti慢约10-15%(取决于散热能力)。根据规格,Max-Q型号的基频慢22%,睿频慢16%。

与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1660Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。性能与旧GTX 1070(Max-Q)相似,但降低的TGP为60瓦(笔记本电脑版本为80,台式机版本为115瓦)。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,也对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令增加高达50%,能耗提高40%。

Nvidia规定功耗为60瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比笔记本电脑的正常版(Max-P)1660Ti低20瓦。因此,Max-Q型号非常适合轻薄型游戏笔记本电脑。 TU116芯片采用台积电12nm FFN制成。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 @ 1.53 - 1.73 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.4 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G0
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
24.8 pt (26%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -95%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M295X -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 -9%
AMD Radeon R9 M395 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI 6%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 9%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 281%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4547     avg: 5197     median: 5072 (28%)     max: 6395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4867     avg: 5089     median: 5084.5 (26%)     max: 5440 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600 -98%
...
AMD Radeon R9 Nano -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -9%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury -7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU -6%
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 7%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 220799     avg: 314100     median: 306910 (48%)     max: 414592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 76153     avg: 110626     median: 110626 (15%)     max: 145099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16807     avg: 29350     median: 33027 (44%)     max: 39942 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38321     avg: 63736     median: 63086 (31%)     max: 89505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 10103     avg: 11548     median: 11615 (30%)     max: 12739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 12903     avg: 13356     median: 13355 (26%)     max: 13870 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 59373     avg: 104094     median: 86295 (12%)     max: 166615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12279     avg: 15364     median: 15913 (38%)     max: 17377 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 17010     avg: 17711     median: 17439 (29%)     max: 18653 Points
...
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) -4%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) -2%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) 1%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 2%
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) 7%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) 9%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 234%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
361 fps (39%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
219 fps (60%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
157 fps (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
110 fps (45%)
PowerVR GE8100 -100%
...
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q -41%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU -34%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU -28%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 39%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) 71%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
197 fps (96%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
254 fps (44%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
227 fps (52%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
170 fps (64%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2141 Samples/s (22%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4254 Samples/s (14%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10027 points (22%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.6     avg: 86.3     median: 86.3 (16%)     max: 95 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 92     avg: 96.6     median: 96.6 (16%)     max: 101.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 94.2     avg: 105     median: 106.9 (24%)     max: 121 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1501 MHz (78%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1062 MHz (42%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
55.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
57
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
136.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
219  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
214.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
168.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
115.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
91.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.2  fps    + Compare