Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M

AMD Radeon 860M

Radeon 860M是一款功能相当强大的 RDNA 3.5 架构 iGPU，于 2025 年初在 Krakan Point APU 中首次亮相，是 Radeon 760M.它的引擎盖下仅有一些不同之处，如更快的缓存；其 8 个 CU/WGP（512 个统一着色器）的运行频率高达 3,000 MHz。

它支持 DX12 Ultimate、光线追踪、AI 图像生成和其他现代功能，还支持许多流行的视频编解码器，首先包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是，最新加入的 VVC 编解码器不支持硬件。支持 Miracast 和 FreeSync。iGPU 可同时驱动多达 4 台显示器，分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。

预计 AMD 将在 2027 年之前完全支持基于 RDNA 3.5 的 GPU。

性能

其游戏性能足以在低图形设置下玩 2024 款游戏。

功耗

Krakan Point 芯片采用单芯片设计，这意味着 iGPU 与 CPU 内核采用相同的台积电 N4P 工艺制造，因此，截至 2024 年底，能效高于平均水平。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 4508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3100 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 4508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3100 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 - 3100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.6 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.37 -10%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.45 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.45 -7%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.47 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.52 -5%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
2.55 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2.56 -3%
AMD Radeon 680M
2.57 -3%
AMD FirePro W7170M
2.6 -2%
AMD Radeon 860M
2.64
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2.74 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2.74 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2.74 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
2.79 6%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2.84 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
2.89 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2.91 10%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2.96 12%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19 620%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1161%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 219     avg: 357.5     median: 402.5 (3%)     max: 406 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 342     avg: 454.3     median: 474.5 (3%)     max: 559 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1491     avg: 2272     median: 2389 (5%)     max: 2582 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3162     avg: 5194     median: 5795 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
11599 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3941     avg: 6143     median: 6419 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4376     avg: 6754     median: 7054 (6%)     max: 7935 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 210628     avg: 274850     median: 251748 (28%)     max: 362175 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2753     median: 2874 (7%)     max: 3347 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2454     median: 2565 (5%)     max: 2987 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2049 -17%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 -16%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2070 -16%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -10%
AMD Radeon 680M
2232 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -9%
AMD Radeon 760M
2260 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
2402 -2%
AMD Radeon 860M
2454
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
2472 1%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
2601 6%
AMD Radeon 780M
2657 8%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 14%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 15%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 17%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 19%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2934 20%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 849%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 1725%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
426961 Points (43%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
175093 Points (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22791     avg: 29919     median: 31610 (30%)     max: 33922 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 24614     avg: 38048     median: 39580.5 (10%)     max: 43959 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 27136     avg: 28170     median: 28169.5 (27%)     max: 29203 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 30202     avg: 31793     median: 31793 (12%)     max: 33384 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10512     median: 10993 (13%)     max: 12267 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10438     median: 10827 (8%)     max: 12149 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -98%
...
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
9840 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
9910 -5%
AMD Radeon 760M
9912 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9950 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
10005 -4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 -4%
AMD Radeon 680M
10067 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -2%
AMD Radeon 860M
10438
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
10490 0%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
10498 1%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 1%
Intel Arc A350M
10730 3%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
10818 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
10952 5%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
11119 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11171 7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
11286 8%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 554%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1143%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 24821     avg: 31982     median: 31981.5 (9%)     max: 39142 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 20346     avg: 26936     median: 26935.5 (15%)     max: 33525 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon 840M
24793 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24915 -8%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
24931 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
25270 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
25293 -6%
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
25623 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
25664 -5%
AMD FirePro W7170M
25898 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
26569 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
26936
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
27315 1%
AMD Radeon 680M
27519 2%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 4%
Intel Arc A350M
28186 5%
AMD Radeon 760M
28995 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
29214 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29448 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
29844 11%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 11%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132443 392%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
173912 546%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68868 Points (75%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
AMD Radeon 780M
53563 -22%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
53834 -22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54320 -21%
Intel Arc A770M
55811 -19%
AMD Radeon 890M
61324 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61850 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62666 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
64892 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
68580 0%
AMD Radeon 860M
68868
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
69623 1%
AMD Radeon 8060S
75005 9%
...
AMD Radeon 860M
68868 0%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
87172 27%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 15774     avg: 28292     median: 28291.5 (37%)     max: 40809 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19.1 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
101 fps (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
74.8 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
23.4 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
82.1 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
98.6 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
18.3 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
75.8 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
100 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
79.8 fps (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
98.5 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
44.3 fps (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
118 fps (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
18.3 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
51.3 fps (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
31.3 fps (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
32.3 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
53.4 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.8 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.5 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
15.6 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
26.8 fps (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
20.1 fps (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
18 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4517     avg: 13699     median: 13698.5 (10%)     max: 22880 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 116.6     avg: 179     median: 162.8 (9%)     max: 258.07 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -94%
...
AMD Radeon 740M
37.4 -27%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.4 -13%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
44.86 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
45 -12%
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
45.07 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -6%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -4%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -3%
AMD Radeon 860M
51.3
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 1%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 2%
AMD Radeon 840M
56 9%
AMD Radeon 780M
57.2 12%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
57.6 12%
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
61.4 20%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 22%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
62.7 22%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 22%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 933%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 172.7     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 4.3     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 21020     avg: 24218     median: 24281 (6%)     max: 27133 points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 25640     avg: 33918     median: 35215.5 (9%)     max: 38899 points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 536     avg: 622     median: 621.5 (2%)     max: 707 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 974     avg: 1169     median: 1168.5 (2%)     max: 1363 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6397     avg: 6712     median: 6711.5 (6%)     max: 7026 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.7     avg: 53.6     median: 55.3 (7%)     max: 69.2 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.04     avg: 53.6     median: 53.7 (15%)     max: 85.3 Watt
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.8     avg: 55     median: 55.6 (7%)     max: 84.7 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.4207 fps per Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
42.5 dB(A) (61%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
low 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
58.1 59.3 60.4 65.4 68.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.1 43.7 44.2 52.9 54.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.4 34.4 35.6 38 41.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4 30.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
5.1
30.5
5.7
5.6
6.1
Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Assassin's Creed Shadows

Assassin's Creed Shadows

2025
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

2024
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
44.4 54.7 57.4 60.4 61.3 64.5 67.2 72.9 73.9 77.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 50.2 51.9 54.1 56.2 56.8 59.1 65.2 66 69.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.7 37.8 42.1 44.3 45.1 48.2 48.7 51.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9 8 8.8 9.8 10.4 10.6 11.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
24.3 24.7 30.4 32.4 32.5 33.5 34.4 35.2 35.6 36.1 37 37.1 38.7 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9 19.3 21.9 24.3 24.9 24.9 26.8 27.7 28.2 28.3 29.5 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 14.6 17.1 18 18.1 18.7 19.6 19.8 20 21.7 22.3 22.4 22.8 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11.1 12.3 16.2 16.4 16.5 16.7 16.8 17.7 17.9 17.9 18.5 19 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
50.4
64.6
57.6
49
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
10.5
19.2
17.3
20.1
19.1
9.3
17.9
13.1
15.9
19.4
16.7
16.8
11.3
15.5
16.3
19.1
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
19.8 23.6 25 28.4 31.7 31.7 31.8 32 33.7 33.8 34 35.3 36 36.5 36.9 37 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.5 17.9 19.4 23.4 23.6 25.2 25.4 25.4 26.2 26.2 26.4 26.8 29 29.9 30.1 30.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6 14.6 14.9 19.2 19.2 19.4 20.4 20.4 20.4 21 21.1 21.6 23 23.5 23.5 23.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 14.3 14.7 18 18.4 18.9 19.4 19.8 19.9 20 20.3 20.6 21.3 22.5 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
36.8
44.3
58
47.5
56.1
55.2
48.9
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
40.3
The Witcher 3 v4

The Witcher 3 v4

2023
low 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
92.1
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
86.5 88.5 141.5 142.8 144 147.8 150.1 153 157.8 161.1 165.4 165.9 171.3 177.3 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.2 34.7 54.6 56.5 56.5 58.5 59.6 60.3 62.8 63.8 65 65.5 68.2 70.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 29.4 44.4 47.4 47.8 48.4 48.8 50.7 52.1 52.3 53.9 54.5 55.7 58.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 25.2 37.3 40 40.3 40.6 41.4 41.7 42.8 43.9 45.1 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
97 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
47.1 52.9 55.7 57.6 60.2 60.3 60.4 62.2 63.8 64.1 65 66.3 68.3 69.5 73.6 77.2 77.6 79 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5 41.6 44.7 44.9 45.5 45.7 47.5 48 48.9 49.8 52.3 52.6 53.7 55.6 58.4 59 59.7 61.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2 34.9 37.1 38 38 38.7 38.8 39.3 40.4 41.1 43 43.4 43.6 44.5 47.7 47.8 48.6 50.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
40.6 43.8 63.4 65 66.7 66.9 69 70.1 70.2 71 72.2 72.9 75.7 76.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 21.7 32.3 32.4 32.7 33.7 34 34.4 34.6 34.7 34.9 35.5 36.4 37.1 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5 15.7 22.3 22.4 23.3 23.7 23.9 23.9 24 24.6 24.6 25.1 25.6 26.3 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
78.2 131.7 149.6 151.5 153.3 153.9 154.8 155 156.1 161.7 162.5 163.9 164.8 165.7 165.9 166.4 167.5 173.6 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 108.7 109.1 119.1 120 121.6 122.6 122.6 123.6 127.6 129.9 130.1 133.4 133.6 134.9 136.5 137.9 139.5 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 54.6 71.6 74.1 77.2 78.4 79.7 80.4 82.1 82.7 82.8 82.9 83.2 83.4 84.8 87.1 87.4 90 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8 49 63.6 66.6 68.9 69.6 72.2 73.3 73.4 73.7 74.2 74.7 77 77.1 78.1 78.7 79.7 79.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
143.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
54.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
125.1 134.2 145.1 151.9 160.8 163.1 165.9 166.7 167.1 169.9 170.9 171.5 171.8 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.6 119.1 133.7 143.2 153.3 156.7 157.2 157.4 158.3 158.6 160.5 161.5 164.3 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 33.8 52.1 55.7 57.4 58.1 58.7 60.8 62 62.1 66.6 67 70 74.7 76 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5 13.6 20.6 21.2 22 22.2 25.1 25.4 25.7 26 27.5 27.8 27.9 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
76.7
135.9
123.6
145.9
119.8
139.4
140.3
120.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
72.1
134.1
126
141.2
98.6
141.6
139.9
137.3
136
124.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 413.611.18.52
F1 2562483618
Doom: The Dark Ages16.71311.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered15.814.514
Assassin's Creed Shadows171512
Kingdom Come Deliverance 23124.120.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle22.714.5
Stalker 219.316.712.6
Until Dawn44.527.117.6
Space Marine 224.920.518.9
Star Wars Outlaws14.91411.5
F1 2463534410
Senua's Saga Hellblade 218.414.610.7
Ghost of Tsushima33.526.422.4
Horizon Forbidden West26.723.215.9
Cyberpunk 207735262017
Baldur's Gate 332252019
The Witcher 3 v452.140.233.928.1
Strange Brigade147584840
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11645042
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark69342418.4
Dota 2 Reborn1541227971
The Witcher 3143.390.945.628.4
GTA V1611495924
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		10
6
5
4		14
7
1
2		16
8
1
7
2
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $664.00
    Lenovo 2025 IdeaPad Slim 5 Laptop 16" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Radeon 860M Graphics 16GB DDR5 512GB SSD Wi-Fi 7 Windows 11 Pro Bluetooth 5.4 Backlit KB 1080p + IR Camera Touchscreen
  • $649.00
    HP OmniBook 5 16" WUXGA 1920x1200 IPS Laptop 8-Core AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 16GB LPDDR5 512GB SSD AMD Radeon 860M Graphics Wi-Fi 6E Backlit Keyboard 1080p FHD + IR Camera Win11 Pro w/ONT 32GB USB
  • $859.99
    Lenovo Yoga AI Powered 2-in-1 Laptop 16.0" Touchscreen IPS WUXGA Display (AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16GB LPDDR5X, 1TB M.2 PCIe SSD, Backlit KB, Fingerprint, WiFi 7, Win 11 Pro) w/DKZ USB Port Expander
  • $899.99
    Dell 16 Plus DB16255 AI Powered Laptop 16.0" WUXGA (AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16GB LPDDR5X, 1TB M.2 PCIe SSD, AMD Radeon 860M, Win 11 Pro)
  • $729.00
    HP OmniBook 5 16" WUXGA 1920x1200 IPS Laptop 8-Core AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 16GB LPDDR5 1TB SSD AMD Radeon 860M Graphics Wi-Fi 6E Backlit Keyboard 1080p FHD + IR Camera Win11 Pro w/ONT 32GB USB

v1.35
log 31. 05:52:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 31 Jan 2026 05:31:10 +0100 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.017s ... 0.022s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.024s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.024s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.031s ... 0.055s

#12 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.059s ... 0.115s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +2.177s ... 2.291s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 2.292s

#16 Got 526 rows for game benchmarks. +0.103s ... 2.395s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.395s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 2.412s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.268s ... 2.68s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.783s ... 3.463s

#21 return log +0s ... 3.463s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 860M graphics card

这款笔记本电脑将帮你度过内存危机：联想 ThinkPad L14 6 代 AMD 评测

这款笔记本电脑将帮你度过内存危机：联想 ThinkPad L14 6 代 AMD 评测

在物价上涨的时代，价格更实惠的笔记本电脑对更多人来说更有意义。联想 ThinkPad L14 Gen 6 AMD 就是这样一款设备。这款商务笔记本电脑的整体价格较低，与更昂贵的机型相比，购买者可以用更少的钱获得更多的内存。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
专业系列终于拥抱 AMD：戴尔 Pro 14 Plus PB14255 笔记本电脑评测

专业系列终于拥抱 AMD：戴尔 Pro 14 Plus PB14255 笔记本电脑评测

戴尔终于在其新推出的戴尔 Pro 系列中采用了 AMD CPU，并将其用于价格较高的商务笔记本电脑产品系列。戴尔 Pro 14 Plus 取代了戴尔Latitude 5000 和 7000，以比戴尔 Pro Premium 系列更实惠的价格提供了许多商务功能。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
华硕ExpertBook PM3评测

华硕 ExpertBook PM3 评测：配备 AMD、超长电池续航时间和 Copilot+ 的办公笔记本电脑

华硕ExpertBook PM3是一款经济实惠的办公笔记本电脑，配备了快速的AMD Ryzen处理器和先进的人工智能功能。在测试中，很多方面都令人信服，但你不应该对其雾面 IPS 显示屏抱有太高期望。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
惠普 OmniBook 7 Aero 13 评论：世界上最轻的 13 英寸笔记本电脑，配备超过 40 TOPS NPU

惠普 OmniBook 7 Aero 13 评论：世界上最轻的 13 英寸笔记本电脑，配备超过 40 TOPS NPU

OmniBook 7 Aero 13 几乎是一款理想的亚笔记本电脑，适合那些希望在不牺牲太多性能或质量的前提下尽可能轻便携带的经常出差的人。考虑到系统的尺寸和重量，AMD Zen 5 CPU 尤其出色。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 13.30" | 1 kg
紧凑型商务笔记本电脑，却有一些不受欢迎的惊喜 - 联想 ThinkPad X13 G6 AMD

紧凑型商务笔记本电脑，却有一些不受欢迎的惊喜 - 联想 ThinkPad X13 G6 AMD

联想从头开始重新设计了第六代 ThinkPad X13，采用了更轻薄的机身，明显强调了移动性。这种转变伴随着妥协，ThinkPad 的老用户可能会感到失望，尤其是显示屏铰链和键盘。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 13.30" | 1.1 kg

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 性能稳定，OLED 色彩丰富：宏碁 Swift Go 16 AI 评测

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 配备 AMD Ryzen Pro 的大型商务笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象--联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 评测

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » AMD 亚笔记本三强争霸 - 华硕 ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K 评测

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI 笔记本电脑评测：内外重新设计

Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 0.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 - 配备 AMD Ryzen AI 7 和现代功能的商用迷你电脑评测

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 戴尔 14 Plus 二合一可折叠电脑评测：AMD 比英特尔更具优势

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 亮丽的 1,100 nit OLED，但意外的质量问题--联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 评测

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 强劲的 AMD Zen5 CPU，配备手写笔和 OLED，价格低廉：联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 90 Hz OLED，AdobeRGB - 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 评测：创作者笔记本电脑中的 1100 nit OLED 和 AMD Zen 5

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测：人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作？

HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 (AMD): AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 (AMD)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10

Dell Pro 14 PC14255: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Pro 14 PC14255

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14, Ryzen AI 7 350

Asus ExpertBook PM3606: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook PM3606

Asus Vivobook S14 M3407KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 M3407KA

LG gram 15Z80T (2025): AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG gram 15Z80T (2025)

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1

Asus ExpertBook PM3406: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook PM3406

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI

Asus Vivobook S14 M5406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 M5406KA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip Next Gen AI 14-fk0000

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350

HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg

MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG

Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA

Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 6 21SE0022GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 一分钱一分货联想ThinkPad L14和T14的区别解析

   » AMD 版本终于跟上时代：为什么这款联想笔记本电脑比 ThinkPad E14 更好？

Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 自取其辱戴尔不应在1500欧元笔记本电脑上安装廉价屏幕

   » 焊接内存逆潮流而动戴尔仍未在其 Pro 笔记本电脑中采用 Concept Luna 概念

Asus ExpertBook PM3406: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 评测结论 华硕ExpertBook PM3--保修期长、更新安全的优秀办公笔记本电脑

Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 这款戴尔笔记本电脑对 AMD 来说是一次巨大的胜利

Asus ExpertBook PM3406: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 华硕ExpertBook PM3是联想ThinkPad E14的理想替代品

HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 13.30", 1 kg
   » 惠普 OmniBook 7 Aero 13 推出不到 4 个月，折扣已接近 40

   » 1 千克重的惠普 OmniBook 7 Aero 13 令人印象深刻，但也有一些不足之处

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G6 AMD: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 13.30", 1.1 kg
   » 联想 ThinkPad X13 G6 不及戴尔 Pro 13 Premium

   » 联想 ThinkPad X13 G6 外形小巧，但键盘和显示屏铰链是弱点

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 联想 ThinkPad T16 第 4 代 AMD 有很大的改进空间

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » 本地运行人工智能：使用 Stable Diffusion、ChatGPT、Gemma3 和其他软件测试宏碁 Swift Go 16 AI

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 2 kg
   » AMD ThinkPad T16 提供包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的全套功能

   » Lenovo only offers the expensive business laptop ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 AMD with 60 Hz screens

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 英特尔 ZenBook 14 OLED 配备 Wi-Fi 7，但 AMD 版本的传输速度更快

   » 今年的 ZenBook 14 采用英特尔还是 AMD 更好？

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » EliteBook 8 G1a 16：如果你注重色彩准确性，那么触摸屏配置是不可取的

   » 与 EliteBook 865 G10 相比，惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 的升级幅度很大，但有一个关键方面除外

Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 0.7 kg
   » 华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 评测--配备 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 的迷你 PC 在日常生活中的真正功能

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 戴尔 14 Plus 2 合 1 AMD 版比英特尔版更快，但有一个问题

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想的新型 OLED 屏幕非常出色，但 Yoga Slim 7 14 的机身质量还有待提高

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 小心经济型变体：可折叠笔记本电脑联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 显示了廉价配置的风险

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8060S
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
Arc 140T *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Pro A30M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Radeon 890M
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Adreno 840 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
Vega M GH
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU *
Arc 130T
GeForce MX450 *
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 860M *
Radeon 760M *
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 840M *
Radeon 740M *
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P520
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M *
Vega 7
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter