Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M

AMD Radeon 860M

Radeon 860M是一款功能相当强大的 RDNA 3.5 架构 iGPU,于 2025 年初在 Krakan Point APU 中首次亮相,是 Radeon 760M.它的引擎盖下仅有一些不同之处,如更快的缓存;其 8 个 CU/WGP(512 个统一着色器)的运行频率高达 3,000 MHz。

它支持 DX12 Ultimate、光线追踪、AI 图像生成和其他现代功能,还支持许多流行的视频编解码器,首先包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是,最新加入的 VVC 编解码器不支持硬件。支持 Miracast 和 FreeSync。iGPU 可同时驱动多达 4 台显示器,分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。

预计 AMD 将在 2027 年之前完全支持基于 RDNA 3.5 的 GPU。

性能

其游戏性能足以在低图形设置下玩 2024 款游戏。

功耗

Krakan Point 芯片采用单芯片设计,这意味着 iGPU 与 CPU 内核采用相同的台积电 N4P 工艺制造,因此,截至 2024 年底,能效高于平均水平。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.37 -11%
2.38 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.45 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.47 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.52 -6%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
2.55 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2.56 -4%
AMD Radeon 680M
2.57 -4%
AMD FirePro W7170M
2.6 -3%
AMD Radeon 860M
2.67
2.74 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2.74 3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2.74 3%
2.79 4%
2.84 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
2.89 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 9%
2.91 9%
2.96 11%
...
19 612%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1147%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2941     median: 2996 (8%)     max: 3347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2626     median: 2674 (5%)     max: 2987 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2070 -21%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -16%
AMD Radeon 680M
2227 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -15%
2255 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -12%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
2402 -9%
2472 -6%
2601 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
2626
2702 3%
2766 5%
2805 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 8%
2864 9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 11%
2934 12%
2993 14%
2995 14%
...
19434 640%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 1665%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
426961 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
175093 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22791     avg: 29579     median: 31650 (30%)     max: 31954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 24614     avg: 36962     median: 39271 (10%)     max: 42133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3999     avg: 6272     median: 6465 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 6911     median: 7131 (7%)     max: 7935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 210628     avg: 231188     median: 231188 (26%)     max: 251748 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5570     avg: 5872     median: 6020 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
27136 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
30202 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10853     median: 11147 (13%)     max: 12267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10815     median: 11126 (9%)     max: 12149 Points
171.8 -98%
...
9950 -8%
10005 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
10088 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -5%
10490 -3%
10498 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -2%
10730 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
10815
10818 0%
10952 1%
11119 3%
11171 3%
11286 4%
11305 5%
11429 6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 6%
11751 9%
...
59943 454%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1100%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 24821     avg: 31982     median: 31981.5 (9%)     max: 39142 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 20346     avg: 26936     median: 26935.5 (15%)     max: 33525 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
24697 -8%
24793 -8%
24915 -8%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
24931 -7%
25270 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
25293 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
25664 -5%
AMD FirePro W7170M
25898 -4%
26569 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
26936
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
27315 1%
AMD Radeon 680M
27350 2%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 4%
28186 5%
28693 7%
29214 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29448 9%
29844 11%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 11%
...
151016 461%
max:
173912 546%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68868 Points (75%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
52117 -24%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
53521 -22%
53991 -22%
54320 -21%
55811 -19%
61850 -10%
62666 -9%
63165 -8%
68580 0%
AMD Radeon 860M
68868
69623 1%
73485 7%
...
68868 0%
max:
87172 27%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 15774     avg: 28292     median: 28291.5 (37%)     max: 40809 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19.1 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
101 fps (27%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
74.8 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
23.4 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
82.1 fps (14%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
98.6 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
18.3 fps (6%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
75.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
100 fps (11%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
79.8 fps (12%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
98.5 fps (12%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
44.3 fps (12%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
118 fps (13%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
18.3 fps (3%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
51.3 fps (18%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
31.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
32.3 fps (9%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
53.4 fps (5%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.5 fps (7%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
15.6 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
26.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
20.1 fps (13%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
18 fps (6%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4517     avg: 13699     median: 13698.5 (10%)     max: 22880 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 106.8     avg: 188.8     median: 186.8 (11%)     max: 258.07 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
3.3 -94%
...
37.4 -27%
44.4 -13%
44.86 -13%
45 -12%
45.07 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -6%
48.6 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -4%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -3%
AMD Radeon 860M
51.3
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 1%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 2%
56 9%
57.6 12%
59.8 17%
61.4 20%
62.4 22%
62.7 22%
62.7 22%
...
530 933%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 164.1     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 4.4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 22403     avg: 24635     median: 24523 (6%)     max: 27133 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 26038     avg: 35354     median: 36404 (9%)     max: 38899 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 536     avg: 622     median: 621.5 (2%)     max: 707 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 974     avg: 1169     median: 1168.5 (2%)     max: 1363 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6397     avg: 6712     median: 6711.5 (6%)     max: 7026 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.5     avg: 58.5     median: 61.5 (8%)     max: 69.2 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.04     avg: 58     median: 65.2 (19%)     max: 85.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.8     avg: 63     median: 62.8 (8%)     max: 84.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.3089 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
42.5 dB(A) (61%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
65.4 68.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.9 54.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38 41.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
30.5
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
61.3 64.5 67.2 72.9 73.9 77.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.1 56.2 59.1 65.2 66 69.6 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.3 45.1 48.2 48.7 51.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 10.4 10.6 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.3 30.4 35.6 36.1 37.1 38.7 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9 21.9 27.7 28.3 29.5 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.1 18 21.7 22.4 22.8 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11.1 17.9 17.9 19 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
50.4
64.6
57.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
10.5
19.2
17.3
20.1
19.1
9.3
17.9
19.4
low 1920x1080
23.6 28.4 31.7 34 35.3 36 36.5 36.9 37 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9 23.6 26.2 26.2 26.8 29 29.9 30.1 30.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 19.2 19.4 20.4 21.6 23 23.5 23.5 23.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 18.9 19.4 20 21.3 22.5 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
36.8
44.3
58
47.5
55.2
low 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
92.1
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
88.5 141.5 147.8 153 165.4 165.9 171.3 177.3 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.7 54.6 56.5 60.3 63.8 65 68.2 70.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 44.4 47.4 50.7 52.3 53.9 55.7 58.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 37.3 40 42.8 43.9 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
97 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
47.1 52.9 57.6 60.2 64.1 65 66.3 73.6 77.2 77.6 79 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5 41.6 44.7 45.7 47.5 49.8 52.3 58.4 59 59.7 61.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2 34.9 38 38.7 39.3 41.1 43.4 47.7 47.8 48.6 50.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
40.6 65 66.7 66.9 70.1 75.7 76.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 32.3 34 34.6 35.5 36.4 37.1 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5 22.4 23.7 23.9 25.1 25.6 26.3 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
78.2 131.7 151.5 156.1 163.9 164.8 165.7 165.9 166.4 167.5 173.6 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 109.1 119.1 122.6 122.6 129.9 133.4 134.9 136.5 137.9 139.5 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 71.6 74.1 78.4 80.4 82.1 83.2 83.4 84.8 87.1 90 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8 63.6 66.6 72.2 73.7 74.2 77 78.1 78.7 79.7 79.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
143.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
54.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
125.1 163.1 165.9 169.9 170.9 171.5 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.6 153.3 157.2 157.4 158.6 160.5 164.3 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 52.1 57.4 58.7 66.6 70 74.7 76 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5 20.6 22.2 25.1 27.5 27.8 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
76.7
135.9
123.6
145.9
139.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
72.1
134.1
126
141.2
141.6
137.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2567544030.7
F1 2470624811
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty36282117
Baldur's Gate 333272121
The Witcher 3 v452.140.233.928.1
Strange Brigade151594941
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11665142
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark71352518.4
Dota 2 Reborn1531217971
The Witcher 3143.390.945.628.4
GTA V1651526124
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
5
4
2
6
2
2
3
7
2
6
3
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 12. 09:30:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:52:14 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.029s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.025s ... 0.054s

#12 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.04s ... 0.094s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.985s ... 1.079s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.079s

#16 Got 286 rows for game benchmarks. +0.066s ... 1.145s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.145s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 1.153s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.112s ... 1.265s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 1.267s

#21 return log +0s ... 1.267s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 860M graphics card

惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI 笔记本电脑评测:内外重新设计

惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI 笔记本电脑评测:内外重新设计

与去年的 EliteBook 865 G10 相比,EliteBook 8 G1a 16 是一个全新的开始。除了修改命名规则外,新机型比以前更薄,并为商务用户提供了最新的 AMD Zen 5 PRO 选件。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
华硕专家中心 PN54

华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 - 配备 AMD Ryzen AI 7 和现代功能的商用迷你电脑评测

华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 是一款采用现代 AMD Ryzen AI 300 平台的紧凑型迷你 PC。在测试中,我们检验了它的性能、噪音水平、能效和可扩展性。这表明该设备是只适合办公任务,还是也能轻松驾驭要求更高的应用。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 650 g
戴尔 14 Plus 二合一可折叠电脑评测:AMD 比英特尔更具优势

戴尔 14 Plus 二合一可折叠电脑评测:AMD 比英特尔更具优势

戴尔 14 Plus 2 合 1 取代了较老的 Inspiron 14 2 合 1 系列,采用了全新的名称以及 AMD 和英特尔的最新处理器。不过,您可能需要在英特尔和 AMD 配置之间谨慎选择。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
亮丽的 1,100 nit OLED,但意外的质量问题--联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 评测

亮丽的 1,100 nit OLED,但意外的质量问题--联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 评测

Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 是一款轻薄的日常笔记本电脑,配备 AMD Ryzen 处理器和令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板,频率为 120 Hz,最大亮度为 1,100 nits。不过,它在外壳质量方面遇到了一些意想不到的问题。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
强劲的 AMD Zen5 CPU,配备手写笔和 OLED,价格低廉:联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测

强劲的 AMD Zen5 CPU,配备手写笔和 OLED,价格低廉:联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测

千美元是买家的一个重要心理价位。联想的 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 就低于这个价位。在这款带笔的可折叠二合一笔记本电脑中,你可以用相对较低的价格获得出色的性能、OLED 屏幕和舒适的键盘。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 90 Hz OLED,AdobeRGB - 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 评测:创作者笔记本电脑中的 1100 nit OLED 和 AMD Zen 5

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作?

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip Next Gen AI 14-fk0000

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350

HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg

MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG

Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » EliteBook 8 G1a 16:如果你注重色彩准确性,那么触摸屏配置是不可取的

   » 与 EliteBook 865 G10 相比,惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 的升级幅度很大,但有一个关键方面除外

Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 0.7 kg
   » 华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 评测--配备 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 的迷你 PC 在日常生活中的真正功能

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 戴尔 14 Plus 2 合 1 AMD 版比英特尔版更快,但有一个问题

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想的新型 OLED 屏幕非常出色,但 Yoga Slim 7 14 的机身质量还有待提高

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 小心经济型变体:可折叠笔记本电脑联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 显示了廉价配置的风险

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon 8040S *
Arc 140T *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 130T *

Class 3

GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter