Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

采用28纳米制程的英伟达Quadro M1200是一块支持DirectX 12(FL_11_0)和OpenGL 4.5的移动工作站显卡。它是一块基于第一代Maxwell架构,GM107芯片的显卡,提供了640个着色器核心。因此,这款显卡类似于消费市场的Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M或950M。Quadro M1200M专为英特尔Skylake微架构设计,用于接替Quadro M1000M(基于950M)。

Quadro系列显卡提供了经过认证的驱动,为专业应用程序如CAD或DCC等提供了稳定性和性能上的优化。例如,在OpenGL性能上它应显著高于同规格的GeForce显卡。

性能

Quadro M1200的性能与同样是基于960M的前代M2000M接近。在游戏中,虽然驱动程序不是为游戏优化,但也应接近于GTX 960M。

使用CUDA(Compute Capability 5.0)或OpenCL 1.2,Quadro M2000M的核心可用于一般计算。

功耗

Quadro M1200的额定功耗为45瓦(热设计功耗32.5瓦),因此比额定功耗55瓦的M2000M低一点。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q1
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1870 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.8 pt (12%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -88%
...
NVIDIA GeForce 945M -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 -6%
AMD Radeon RX 640 -5%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
AMD Radeon R9 M280X 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q 8%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
1290 Points (9%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
240298 Points (45%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (20%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (13%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (10%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (14%)     max: 5516 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (10%)     max: 5515 points
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 -6%
AMD Radeon RX 640 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M -3%
AMD Radeon Pro 555 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M -1%
AMD Radeon Pro 560 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) 1%
AMD Radeon Pro 455 1%
AMD FirePro M6100 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
27.7 fps (17%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (15%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (11%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
388 Points (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
79  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
88.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
73.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 fps