Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 540

AMD Radeon RX 540

是基于Polaris 12芯片(最有可能)用于笔记本电脑的移动中档显卡。采用改进的14 nm FinFET工艺制造。性能应该在MacBook Pro 2016系列中同样基于Polaris架构的Radeon Pro 450和455之间。AMD以1.2 TFLOPS(Pro 450 1 TFLOP,Pro 455 1.3 TFLOP)定制RX 450。与英伟达显卡相比,游戏性能应该在GeForce GTX 950M和GTX 960M之间。

Radeon RX 540的特点和比它更快的RX 460以及所有其他Polaris芯片相同。 在这查看Polaris构架以获取更多细节。

根据AMD的博客文章,性能更好的Radeon Pro 460的功耗是35瓦。由于性能较差,Radeon RX 540的耗能略少。

Radeon RX 500 Series
Radeon RX 590 2304 @ 1.47 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 2304 @ 1.26 - 1.34 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 570 2048 @ 1.17 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) 2304 @ 1.08 GHz
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) 2048 @ 0.93 - 1.21 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.17 - 1.28 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.09 - 1.29 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) 640 @ 1.29 - 1.48 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540X 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
Power Consumption75 Watt
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
8.9 pt (10%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -89%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M280X -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M -3%
AMD Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 1%
AMD FirePro M5100 2%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 10%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 643     avg: 869     median: 869 (5%)     max: 1095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 566     avg: 787     median: 787 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -86%
...
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) -19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -14%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) -12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 -8%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs -5%
AMD Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon 540X 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 11%
AMD Radeon Pro 450 21%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 21%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
138197 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
67875 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 9431     avg: 12236     median: 12853.5 (16%)     max: 13804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 18704     avg: 23165     median: 24170 (10%)     max: 25616 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2495     avg: 3053     median: 3059 (8%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3242     avg: 3623     median: 3686 (7%)     max: 3876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 83467     avg: 89575     median: 89574.5 (12%)     max: 95682 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3783     avg: 4673     median: 4664 (9%)     max: 5273 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4443     avg: 4699     median: 4646 (7%)     max: 4983 Points
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro 450 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI -1%
NVIDIA Quadro P600 -1%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X 0%
AMD Radeon RX 540
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 7%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 9%
AMD Radeon Pro 555 10%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 12248     avg: 13720     median: 13719.5 (4%)     max: 15191 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 11597     avg: 12907     median: 12906.5 (10%)     max: 14216 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M -5%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M -3%
AMD Radeon Pro 450 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) -1%
AMD Radeon RX 540
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX 1%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 5%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
48274 Points (25%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
20313 Points (28%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M -7%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI -6%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI -5%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) -5%
AMD Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon R7 M445 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14964     avg: 16481     median: 15818 (24%)     max: 18661 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19.3 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
31.2 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
17.3 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 31.9     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 47.6 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8002     avg: 9285     median: 9285 (7%)     max: 10568 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 86.4     median: 94 (34%)     max: 95 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 72.7     avg: 76.8     median: 76.4 (21%)     max: 81.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
29.1 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
31.8 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 414     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (2%)     max: 447 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 811     avg: 858     median: 858 (2%)     max: 905 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 990     avg: 1565     median: 998 (2%)     max: 2708 points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.5     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (8%)     max: 58.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 68.1     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (15%)     max: 69.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 Points per Watt (0%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.1 Points per Watt (0%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
32 42 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12 25 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.8 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 12 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11 24.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3 9.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2 4.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
89.2 180 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.1