Notebookcheck Logo

华为MateBook 14s i7笔记本评测--强大的副笔记本与3:2触摸屏

14.2英寸,90赫兹和标准电压的CPU。 华为MateBook 14s是一款新的副笔记本,拥有高分辨率的3:2触摸屏。除了14.2英寸的面板,你还可以得到英特尔新的Tiger Lake-H35芯片Core i7-11370H。
Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

华为通过新的MateBook 14s扩大了其MateBook系列,这是一款高质量的子笔记本,拥有新的14.2英寸高分辨率触摸屏以及强大的英特尔处理器,TDP为45W。这意味着MateBook 14s是华为自己的一个大竞争对手MateBook X Pro,它目前配备的是较慢的Tiger Lake-U CPU。

华为在发布会上提供了两种配置,只在存储容量方面有所不同。1299欧元的入门级机型配备了512GB固态硬盘存储,而1499欧元的机型则配备了1TB PCI-SSD。除此以外,这两个型号的产品拥有相同的组件。酷睿i7-11370HIris Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)16GB内存,以及2.5K触摸屏。更多华为MateBook评论。

Huawei MateBook 14s i7 (MateBook 14s Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1350 MHz, Memory: 1400 MHz, 27.20.100.9664
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR4x-3733, Dual-Channel, on-board
Display
14.20 inch 3:2, 2520 x 1680 pixel 213 PPI, capacitiveLTPS, CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, 408 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.7 x 314 x 230
Battery
60 Wh, 5195 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W PSU, Huawei PC Manager, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.443 kg, Power Supply: 241 g
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.6 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.7 mm14.20"2520x1680
87.8 %
03/2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm13.90"3000x2000
86.3 %
12/2020
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350
1.5 kg15.9 mm14.00"2160x1440
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8
1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
89.1 %
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
87.4 %
12/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.8 mm13.40"3840x2400
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600

外壳 - MateBook,有大量的铝材

新款MateBook 14s的外壳设计非常类似于MateBook X Pro以及标准的MateBook 14.典型的元素,如基本单元周围的抛光边缘,圆角,以及前面的轻微压痕和键盘上方的电源按钮,很容易识别这个设备是华为的笔记本电脑。由于边框非常窄(4.4毫米),这款笔记本看起来非常现代。除了标准的太空灰颜色,你可以再次得到MateBook的绿色,但与MateBook X Pro(翡翠绿)相反,现在是独家颜色云杉绿,在直接比较中看起来更内敛,没有那么丰富。

MateBook 14s的云杉绿
MateBook 14s的云杉绿

华为几乎完全使用金属(铝)进行数控加工的机箱,只有铰链的盖子是由塑料制成的。笔记本电脑的构造完美,稳定性也很好。扭曲的尝试对底座单元来说没有问题,也没有恼人的吱嘎声。当你用很大的力气打字的时候,你只能稍微凹陷一下底座单元。指纹对哑光表面来说不是什么大问题。

盖子得益于额外的玻璃层,扭动的尝试再次没有挑战;即使是集中的压力也不会导致图片失真。你可以用一只手打开盖子,铰链调整得很好,但当你调整盖子的开启角度时,它们不能完全防止一些反弹。最大的开启角度是~145度。

新款MateBook 14s是我们对比组中最大的设备,但它也有14.2英寸的大屏幕。当涉及到机箱的高度时,所有的对手都基本处于同一水平线上。

Size Comparison

314 mm 230 mm 16.7 mm 1.4 kg312.4 mm 221.4 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1 kg307.5 mm 223.8 mm 15.9 mm 1.5 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 华为不包括Thunderbolt

华为为MateBook 14s配备了两个USB-C接口和一个普通USB-A接口。类似于华为MateBook X Pro华为MateBook 14s没有官方的Thunderbolt认证,也没有给我们关于这两个端口规格的任何确切信息。它们支持DisplayPort-ALT模式以及Power Delivery,所以我们相信它们支持10Gbps的USB 3.2 Gen.2。最后,有一个全尺寸的HDMI输出,以及3.5毫米立体声插孔。

左侧:2个USB-C(DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 1.4b,3.5毫米立体声
左侧:2个USB-C(DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 1.4b,3.5毫米立体声
右侧。USB 3.2 Gen.1 (供电)
右侧。USB 3.2 Gen.1 (供电)

沟通

无线模块是目前的英特尔AX201卡,它支持现代Wi-Fi 6标准(802.11ax,2x2)以及蓝牙5.1。我们与路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120的标准化测试确定了非常高的传输速率,在我们的审查期间,我们也没有发现Netgear路由器或Fritz!Box 7590(Wi-Fi 5)有任何限制。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (1216min - 1530max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1365 (955min - 1588max) MBit/s -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1337 (691min - 1388max) MBit/s -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1303 (653min - 1347max) MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1129 (947min - 1229max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (606 - 1339, n=3, last 2 years)
1056 MBit/s -25%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
900 (774min - 1005max) MBit/s -36%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1542 (1327min - 1601max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1501 (1471min - 1536max) MBit/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1486 (713min - 1549max) MBit/s -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1401 (1271min - 1454max) MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (623 - 1690, n=3, last 2 years)
1258 MBit/s -18%
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1230 (708min - 1294max) MBit/s -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s -56%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
667 (636min - 696max) MBit/s -57%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14s i7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1327-1601)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1400 (1216-1530)

网络摄像头

华为设法在显示屏上方的 "正常 "位置安装了网络摄像头,这意味着隐藏在键盘内的网络摄像头的时代似乎已经结束。另一方面,质量仍然相当平庸;720p的传感器完成了它的工作,但即使在光线良好的情况下,它也不能拍出像样的照片。

ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook 14s i7: 8.48 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 13.89 ∆E

维护

MateBook 14s的底板由几个Torx螺丝(T5)固定,很容易拆卸。不过,除了清洗风扇,你只能更换M.2-2280固态硬盘。所有其他组件,包括内存和Wi-Fi模块都焊接在主板上。

内部布局
内部布局
你只能访问风扇和M.2-2280 SSD。
你只能访问风扇和M.2-2280 SSD。

输入设备 - MateBook 14s,键程1.5毫米

键盘

与目前的趋势相反,MateBook 14s的键盘更薄,键程更小,但它的键程为1.5毫米,与其他机型相比,你会注意到它(如MateBook 13)打字时,你会注意到。较长的文本是绝对没有问题的。键盘布局与MateBooks相同,包括小型垂直方向键。我们非常喜欢键盘上方的独立电源键,所以它不碍事,而且它包括一个可靠的指纹扫描仪。有一个两阶段的白色背景照明,适合较暗的环境。

输入设备
输入设备
背景照明
背景照明

触摸板和触摸屏

大尺寸的点击板(12 x 7.4厘米),其光滑的表面支持微软Precision 标准,在实践中运行良好。它可以识别多达四个手指的手势。唯一的问题是点击机制,这对我们的口味来说有点太响了,这显得有点廉价。我们建议用点击输入来代替,这样就不会有恼人的声音。

还有用于输入的电容式触摸屏。它可以同时识别多达10个输入,并且像你期望的那样,在现代触摸屏上运行良好。

显示屏 - 3:2触摸屏,90 Hz模式

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
只有轻微的背光渗漏
只有轻微的背光渗漏

笔记本笔记本电脑已经配备了14英寸3:2触摸屏,但新的MateBook 14s有一个更大的14.2英寸屏幕,分辨率从2160 x 1140像素提高到1520 x 1680像素(2.5K)。这导致像素密度达到213 ppi,画面清晰。光面LTPS屏幕的主观画质非常好,以清晰和丰富的图像令人信服。得益于集成的光线传感器,亮度可以根据环境光线自动调整。

华为宣传的亮度为400cd/m²,对比度为1500:1,我们可以确认这些数值。我们用X-Rite i1 Pro 2和专业的CalMAN软件进行测量,确定平均亮度为407cd/m²,对比度超过1800:1(黑值0.23)。这些都是非常好的结果,但竞争对手如MateBook X Pro,以及MateBook 14以及戴尔XPS 13在亮度方面有优势。

即使在最大亮度的情况下,在黑暗的图片上也只有轻微的背光渗漏,但在日常工作中并不明显。当亮度下降到40%或更低时,我们可以检测到27千赫兹的显示闪烁,但这个频率非常高,不应该造成任何限制。

按Fn+R键,你可以在60赫兹和90赫兹之间切换刷新率,在切换过程中显示器会关闭一秒钟。当你滚动或移动窗口时,画面在90赫兹下明显更流畅。然而,对于视频播放来说没有任何优势,所以它更像是一个噱头。

404
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 420 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 406.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 420 cd/m²
Contrast: 1822:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Lenovo LEN8A90, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14
CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14.00
Display
-4%
7%
7%
11%
23%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
67.8
64.9
-4%
76
12%
75.4
11%
80.2
18%
98.6
45%
67.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
98.3
94.4
-4%
100
2%
99
1%
100
2%
100
2%
99.1
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.1
66.3
-5%
75.6
8%
76.4
9%
78.9
13%
85.9
23%
69
-2%
Response Times
-11%
-22%
10%
-79%
107%
37%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
37.6 ?(17.6, 20)
-0%
37 ?(16, 21)
2%
32.8 ?(15.6, 17.2)
13%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-57%
31 ?(14, 17)
18%
37.6 ?(18, 19.6)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 ?(10.8, 10.8)
26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8)
-22%
15 ?(5, 10)
31%
20.4 ?(10, 10.4)
6%
40.4 ?(22.4, 18)
-87%
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
-21%
22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)
-4%
PWM Frequency
27780 ?(40)
300 ?(40)
-99%
2137 ?(31)
-92%
118000 ?(49, 155)
325%
59520 ?(30)
114%
Screen
1%
-67%
-28%
-24%
1%
-35%
Brightness middle
419
502
20%
392
-6%
390
-7%
508.7
21%
417
0%
458
9%
Brightness
407
474
16%
390
-4%
387
-5%
479
18%
395
-3%
448
10%
Brightness Distribution
93
89
-4%
80
-14%
94
1%
84
-10%
91
-2%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.23
0.33
-43%
0.29
-26%
0.29
-26%
0.3
-30%
0.39
-70%
0.25
-9%
Contrast
1822
1521
-17%
1352
-26%
1345
-26%
1696
-7%
1069
-41%
1832
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
1.35
29%
3.4
-79%
2.8
-47%
2.72
-43%
1.12
41%
3.4
-79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
3.67
-2%
6.41
-78%
4.4
-22%
4.7
-31%
2.71
25%
6.7
-86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
1.2
-33%
3.44
-282%
1.8
-100%
1.92
-113%
0.77
14%
1.7
-89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
1.7
41%
5.44
-88%
3.5
-21%
3.4
-17%
1.7
41%
4.9
-69%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
2.11 104%
2207 0%
2.16 102%
CCT
6733 97%
6440 101%
6013 108%
6174 105%
6245 104%
6870 95%
7704 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.1
69.1
76.4
70.7
63.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94.3
100
99
100
99.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -2%
-27% / -43%
-4% / -15%
-31% / -28%
44% / 26%
0% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

画面开箱后已经非常好,与sRGB参考值相比,DeltaE-2000的平均偏差较小3,但灰度显示出轻微的偏蓝。然而,这只是在你直接将屏幕与经过校准的屏幕进行比较时,用肉眼就可以发现。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

我们的校准(配置文件可在上面的方框中免费下载)可以改善画面,也可以消除偏蓝。校准后,最大亮度只略有下降。面板几乎完全覆盖了小的sRGB参考值,再加上准确的色彩,MateBook 14s的面板适合图片/视频编辑)。)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 27780 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 27780 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 27780 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们希望在户外看到更高的亮度,以弥补光面屏幕的反射。MateBook 14s只有在阴凉处使用才真正舒适。对于LTPS屏幕的视角稳定性,没有任何批评意见。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 华为使用Tiger Lake-H35

华为实现了两种电源模式(平衡和性能),它们独立于常规的Windows性能设置,可以通过组合键(Fn+P)舒适地进行切换。我们用性能模式进行了以下基准测试和测量,但在大多数情况下你不会注意到很大的差异。只有在CPU和iGPU合并工作负载的情况下,性能模式才有明显优势。在电池供电时,你只能使用平衡模式。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-11370H

华为使用新的酷睿i7-11370H来自Tiger Lake 代。它的TDP指定在35-45瓦之间,但与其他H系列CPU相比,它只有四个核心(8个线程)和更快的iGPU(Iris Xe Graphics G7)作为回报。它基本上只是一个加强版的U系列处理器,性能与H系列处理器没有什么区别。酷睿i7-1185G7酷睿i7-1165G7至少,如果它们以相同的TDP水平运行的话。

不过,MateBook 14s的性能利用率还是不错的,因为处理器确实可以消耗45瓦特,而且在持续工作负荷下可以保持这个水平。然而,四核的结果总体上是相当令人清醒的。由于高涡轮增压,单核性能非常好,但在多核测试中,与普通U系列芯片相比,优势相当小。AMD目前的Ryzen处理器(包括U系列和H系列)提供的多核性能也要好得多。

当你使用平衡电源模式时,TDP下降到35瓦,在CB R15多循环的结果下降了10%左右。在电池电源上没有性能下降(与平衡模式相比)。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1038 (1027.19-1054.52)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø1902 (1801.56-1936.39)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø886 (876-943.04)
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø714 (631.55-870.74)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R05E AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1515 (1493.48-1573.63)
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD AMD Ryzen 5 5600U: Ø1265 (1234.26-1271.74)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环(红色:性能,绿色:平衡)。
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环(红色:性能,绿色:平衡)。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12109 Points +83%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=71, last 2 years)
10131 Points +53%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
6612 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5878 Points -11%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5590 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3696 - 6646, n=12)
5563 Points -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5062 (4319.28min - 5062.12max) Points -23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4043 (3994.31min - 4043max) Points -39%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=71, last 2 years)
1615 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1518 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1515 Points 0%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1498 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1081 - 1556, n=11)
1469 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1440 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1350 Points -11%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4703 Points +82%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=67, last 2 years)
3899 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
2578 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2235 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1438 - 2578, n=11)
2146 Points -17%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2108 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1936 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1863 Points -28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points -40%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=67, last 2 years)
606 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
590 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
582 Points -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
580 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
567 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (475 - 601, n=11)
566 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
522 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
401 Points -32%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1936 Points +84%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=73, last 2 years)
1728 Points +64%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1055 (1027.19min - 1054.52max) Points
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (606 - 1086, n=17)
946 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
943 (876min - 943.04max) Points -11%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
915 Points -13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
871 (631.55min - 870.74max) Points -17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
635 (464.15min - 634.96max) Points -40%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
237 Points +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=65, last 2 years)
235 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
225 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (162.9 - 233, n=15)
220 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
217.1 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
209 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
208 Points -11%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
202 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Seconds * -62%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * -54%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
652 Seconds * -41%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
543 Seconds * -18%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (432 - 762, n=11)
531 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
525 Seconds * -14%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
461 Seconds *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=69, last 2 years)
390 Seconds * +15%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
254 Seconds * +45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
54089 MIPS +90%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16223 - 67444, n=60, last 2 years)
43704 MIPS +53%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
34614 MIPS +21%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
28520 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25894 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (18961 - 28520, n=11)
25340 MIPS -11%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
24151 MIPS -15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
20478 MIPS -28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19404 MIPS -32%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5800 MIPS +8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
5441 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5408 MIPS +1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5352 MIPS
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2197 - 6403, n=61, last 2 years)
5299 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5074 - 5550, n=11)
5290 MIPS -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5225 MIPS -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5140 MIPS -4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5099 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4213 - 12580, n=69, last 2 years)
8865 Points +48%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7370 Points +23%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5985 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5791 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5441 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3828 - 6115, n=10)
5258 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5186 Points -13%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4693 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points +9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=69, last 2 years)
1683 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1588 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1579 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1546 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=10)
1540 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1535 Points -3%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1514 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1454 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.2 fps +67%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.5 - 19.4, n=59, last 2 years)
11.8 fps +39%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.51 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.46 fps -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4.98 - 8.82, n=11)
7.24 fps -15%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.73 fps -21%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.58 fps -34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.23 fps -39%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook
  (40.1 - 120.5, n=60, last 2 years)
53.2 s * -21%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.4 s * -17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49 s * -12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
47.7 s * -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23.6 - 56.5, n=11)
45.9 s * -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.6 s * -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.8 s * -2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
43.8 s *
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
12.88 s * +71%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
0.732 sec * -33%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.605 sec * -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.605 sec * -10%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.585 sec * -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.569 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.544 - 0.596, n=11)
0.564 sec * -3%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.549 sec *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.4397 - 1.236, n=60, last 2 years)
0.525 sec * +4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.505 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1055 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
233 Points
Help

系统性能

系统性能很好,硬件方面有体面的处理器、16GB LPDDR4x-RAM(3733 MHz)和快速的PCI-SSD。输入被迅速执行,在合成PCMark 10基准中的高分支持良好的主观印象。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6414 Points +18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=58, last 2 years)
5848 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5419 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5199 - 5459, n=6)
5356 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5104 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4872 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
10836 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
10531 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (9996 - 10650, n=6)
10375 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10368 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=58, last 2 years)
10213 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10184 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9682 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
9852 Points +39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=58, last 2 years)
7852 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7082 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6911 - 7388, n=6)
7057 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6807 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6719 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6622 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=58, last 2 years)
6847 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6709 Points +16%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5790 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5483 - 5838, n=6)
5699 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5114 Points -12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4894 Points -15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4583 Points -21%
PCMark 10 Score
5419 points
Help

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载)没有显示出MateBook 14s的任何限制,所以它适合使用实时音频应用程序。

LatnecyMon概述
LatnecyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1272 μs * -120%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1225 μs * -112%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
739 μs * -28%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
577 μs *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
316.1 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

华为使用PCIe-3.0-x4固态硬盘,代号为KPART512,存储容量为512GB,这与东芝XG6相同。传输速率还不错,但与之前的MateBooks类似,该驱动器被分为两个分区,系统驱动器在初始设置后只有71GB的可用存储空间,这不是很慷慨。当你在应用安装或下载时不注意,这可能很快导致硬盘满了。华为应该在即将推出的设备中摆脱这些分区。现代PCIe 4.0标准还不被支持。更多的SSD基准测试可以在我们的 技术部分.

Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
-4%
50%
-25%
-27%
Write 4K
209.4
197.5
-6%
154
-26%
240
15%
86
-59%
112.8 ?(21.6 - 209, n=14)
-46%
Read 4K
56.8
52.9
-7%
65.3
15%
90.9
60%
40.11
-29%
42.7 ?(16.8 - 56.8, n=14)
-25%
Write Seq
2174
2288
4236
1738
1489 ?(750 - 1897, n=13)
Read Seq
2156
2154
4101
1553
1771 ?(899 - 2202, n=13)
Write 4K Q32T1
606
632
4%
459.9
-24%
662
9%
454.9
-25%
345 ?(63.1 - 606, n=14)
-43%
Read 4K Q32T1
792
694
-12%
556
-30%
720
-9%
385.4
-51%
359 ?(30.9 - 792, n=14)
-55%
Write Seq Q32T1
2322
3017
30%
3277
41%
5222
125%
2784
20%
2257 ?(853 - 2966, n=14)
-3%
Read Seq Q32T1
3511
3561
1%
3520
0%
7102
102%
3217
-8%
2926 ?(998 - 3511, n=14)
-17%
Write 4K Q8T8
1573
1080 ?(250 - 1573, n=4)
-31%
Read 4K Q8T8
1202
1232 ?(794 - 1490, n=4)
2%
AS SSD
11%
17%
71%
-68%
-29%
Seq Read
2961
2794
-6%
2965
0%
4899
65%
2144
-28%
2456 ?(1837 - 2961, n=14)
-17%
Seq Write
2098
2385
14%
2697
29%
3952
88%
1389
-34%
1493 ?(802 - 2562, n=14)
-29%
4K Read
53
60.7
15%
55.6
5%
83.8
58%
49.77
-6%
44.1 ?(22.3 - 54.4, n=14)
-17%
4K Write
186.9
180.8
-3%
144.4
-23%
205
10%
105
-44%
119.3 ?(28.9 - 195.8, n=14)
-36%
4K-64 Read
1131
1768
56%
1589
40%
2938
160%
855
-24%
980 ?(416 - 1414, n=14)
-13%
4K-64 Write
1502
1800
20%
1733
15%
2077
38%
1660
11%
1180 ?(199.5 - 1502, n=14)
-21%
Access Time Read *
0.029
0.037
-28%
0.032
-10%
0.025
14%
0.058
-100%
0.08057 ?(0.029 - 0.148, n=14)
-178%
Access Time Write *
0.026
0.073
-181%
0.026
-0%
0.02
23%
0.272
-946%
0.055 ?(0.026 - 0.143, n=14)
-112%
Score Read
1480
2108
42%
1941
31%
3512
137%
1119
-24%
1269 ?(667 - 1719, n=14)
-14%
Score Write
1899
2219
17%
2147
13%
2677
41%
1904
0%
1449 ?(345 - 1899, n=14)
-24%
Score Total
4102
5392
31%
5073
24%
7939
94%
3570
-13%
3326 ?(1300 - 4424, n=14)
-19%
Copy ISO MB/s
1512
2065
37%
2218
47%
2100
39%
1929
28%
1894 ?(1348 - 2625, n=11)
25%
Copy Program MB/s
376.3
734
95%
577
53%
994
164%
1012
169%
552 ?(325 - 1023, n=11)
47%
Copy Game MB/s
1115
1629
46%
1324
19%
1859
67%
1737
56%
1187 ?(755 - 1667, n=11)
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 8%
7% / 11%
61% / 65%
-47% / -55%
-28% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3511 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2322 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 792 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 606 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 209.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1573 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1202 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

GPU-Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7

显卡是我们熟悉的Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)来自酷睿i7 U系列CPU,MateBook 14s在基准测试中介于采用普通U系列芯片的设备之间。Xe Graphics的最大优势是多媒体应用,包括高分辨率视频的播放。与目前AMD的iGPU相比,英特尔iGPU的性能也稍好。性能模式对图形性能没有影响。

MateBook 14s在游戏方面并不完美;只有老的或要求不高的游戏能在低或中等细节下顺利运行,但图形性能至少是稳定的,而且很容易通过苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试(99.7%)。在电池电量方面的表现也是类似的。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=57, last 2 years)
8185 Points +17%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6994 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6624 Points -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7471, n=193)
6342 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6294 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
6258 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U
6020 Points -14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5339 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
4225 Points -40%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
29751 Points +11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13768 - 65911, n=42, last 2 years)
29375 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26910 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
26820 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
26752 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13162 - 38040, n=171)
26309 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
24152 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
18978 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=62, last 2 years)
5959 Points +12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5498 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5327 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5169 Points -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 6143, n=206)
4903 Points -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4795 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U
4081 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
3820 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
2495 Points -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (811 - 4773, n=61, last 2 years)
2007 Points +19%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1688 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1603 Points -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1871, n=203)
1494 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1441 Points -15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1430 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U
1284 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1227 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
785 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
7483 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
19734 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4898 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1886 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.5 (13-16)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 111 95.8 28.5 11.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 101 65 35 14.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 128 90.6 65.5 58
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 46.1 25.9 25.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 47.6 39.1 34.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 58 30 28 26
Strange Brigade (2018) 93 41 33 27
F1 2020 (2020) 80 47 37 21

排放 - MateBook通常很安静

系统噪音

华为使用两个风扇与两个热管,MateBook 14s在实践中通常是一个非常安静的设备。即使是游戏,也经常可以达到约32 dB(A)(在两种电源模式下),只有高的CPU负载才会导致风扇的声音更大。虽然两种电源模式之间没有大的差别,平衡模式为~44 dB(A),性能模式为~47 dB(A)。在我们的测试设备上,我们没有注意到任何其他电子声音或线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
24.3 / 24.3 / 28.4 dB(A)
Load
31.7 / 46.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Noise
3%
-1%
-6%
-1%
off / environment *
24.3
25.4
-5%
26
-7%
25
-3%
27.7
-14%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
25.6
-5%
26
-7%
25
-3%
27.8
-14%
Idle Average *
24.3
25.6
-5%
26.5
-9%
25
-3%
27.8
-14%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
25.6
10%
27.4
4%
26.9
5%
27.8
2%
Load Average *
31.7
28.7
9%
35
-10%
38.6
-22%
27.9
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
31.7
32
-1%
41.2
-30%
32.8
-3%
Load Maximum *
46.8
38.2
18%
34.6
26%
41.2
12%
37
21%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.734.632.432.732.131.733.92532.631.829.728.329.133.131.73129.226.724.42527.825.827.64030.426.629.428.632.827.629.25030.127.125.425.832.429.326.86326.428.228.526.929.728.726.18024.727.529.32623.123.124.510022.727.325.723.523.418.223.412522.325.727.525.923.32022.216021.125.925.224.320.319.421.120020.528.827.626.222.618.921.125022.23028.827.621.120.923.531519.530.729.227.718.614.219.840019.13129.728.517.512.419.250019.334.631.529.617.311.919.863020353230.61812.520.580020.93431.630.618.210.820.8100019.932.63027.816.910.919.4125020.735.231.129.81710.82016002134.63229.917.511.520.8200021.835.132.530.717.511.221.4250020.73632.931.516.211.320.7315018.936.233.330.61511.618.1400020.435.532.430.314.31219.7500017.536.333.431.613.712.417.7630015.735.632.730.513.612.315.3800014.432.327.624.213.412.513.51000013.528.823.920.712.812.413125001525.921.318.512.612.412.61600015.421.617.314.812.311.912.4SPL31.746.843.841.928.424.331.4N1.55.84.741.10.61.5median 20median 32.6median 30median 28.5median 17.3median 12.4median 19.8Delta24.13.43.53.31.52.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHuawei MateBook 14s i7

温度

冷却解决方案做得很好,即使在压力测试中也只有少数地方达到40℃以上。这意味着在负载下绝对没有任何限制,你仍然可以舒适地在你的腿上使用该设备。只有紧凑的电源适配器(90W)在压力测试和为电池充电时变得相当热,超过60℃,所以你绝对不应该用毯子/垫子盖住它。

在压力测试中,MateBook 14s的性能很稳定。根据不同的电源模式,TDP稳定在35或45瓦,这对一个紧凑的设备来说是个好结果。

CPU和iGPU数据压力测试(红色:性能,绿色:平衡)。
CPU和iGPU数据压力测试(红色:性能,绿色:平衡)。
Max. Load
 40.3 °C41 °C38.1 °C 
 40.7 °C41.1 °C33.5 °C 
 28.6 °C27.8 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
32.6 °C45.4 °C36.6 °C
30.5 °C40 °C37.4 °C
28.8 °C31.3 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  63.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部
表面温度应力测试(顶部
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。

发言人

MateBook 14s配备了四个扬声器,它们位于底座的前下部。声音非常好,在高音量下几乎没有任何失真。音乐或视频播放是相当令人愉快的,但扬声器缺乏一些冲击力。四个麦克风负责语音录制,在我们的测试中,声音非常清晰。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.730.92533.1343125.834.74027.635.35029.3356328.735.98023.142.310018.253.51252055.816019.456.820018.96425020.967.131514.267.440012.466.150011.967.263012.57580010.878.8100010.975.3125010.873.3160011.569.3200011.269.4250011.369.5315011.671.240001270.2500012.468.5630012.369.9800012.572.81000012.465.61250012.462.21600011.955.7SPL24.384.1N0.663.6median 12.4median 68.5Delta1.5445.142.445.137.735.437.735.230.635.232.330.632.340.329.840.334.329.934.330.629.630.63527.93549.631.949.65730.6576026.76067.120.267.167.422.867.466.819.966.870.416.670.474.215.274.273.114.873.177.114.177.175.413.975.474.313.774.371.713.671.773.713.873.770.713.370.76913.2697213.27269.113.269.168.513.468.569.713.169.766.813.166.86412.56484.627.884.664.7164.7median 69.1median 13.9median 69.143.8433.436.621.721.82020.62223.522.434.225.730.422.435.717.747.122.457.921.161.615.859.7156213.462.416.168.113.169.211.463.110.766.910.165.510.468.31168.71167.111.266.811.567.511.670.611.967.111.968.711.965.512.162.811.862.41160.623.979.60.547.3median 11.9median 65.523.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MateBook 14s i7Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4KApple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--尽管有2.5k显示屏,但运行时间长

消耗功率

MateBook 14 相比,华为设法将空闲消耗保持在同一水平,尽管显示屏稍大,分辨率更高。这是LTPS技术的结果,但也是最大亮度略低的原因。90赫兹模式在空闲测量中只有很小的影响(+0.6W)。你可以注意到负载下的高TDP,因为我们在压力测试期间测量到88W,几分钟后会平息在70W左右。因此,附带的90W电源适配器是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.58 / 0.95 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.4 / 8.7 / 9.6 Watt
Load midlight 46 / 87.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14.00
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-1%
0%
-31%
10%
44%
-4%
0%
2%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
6.7
-52%
4.6
-5%
9.8
-123%
4.3
2%
1.9
57%
3
32%
5.26 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=184)
-20%
4.91 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=64, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Average *
8.7
10
-15%
7.7
11%
12.5
-44%
8.3
5%
6.4
26%
9
-3%
8.46 ?(3.8 - 63, n=184)
3%
8.38 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=64, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Maximum *
9.6
10.3
-7%
10.3
-7%
13.7
-43%
8.8
8%
7
27%
11
-15%
10.6 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=184)
-10%
10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=64, last 2 years)
-8%
Load Average *
46
35.7
22%
54
-17%
39.3
15%
46.2
-0%
25
46%
60.8
-32%
44.8 ?(12.5 - 77.5, n=184)
3%
46.1 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=63, last 2 years)
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.2
32.7
23%
54.4
-29%
44.8
-6%
42.2
-0%
56
-33%
Load Maximum *
87.6
67.6
23%
44.5
49%
72.8
17%
47.3
46%
30.3
65%
65.6
25%
66.6 ?(30.1 - 118, n=184)
24%
66.6 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=64, last 2 years)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14s i7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø42.2 (40.5-49.5)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø75 (69.4-87.8)

电池运行时间

60Wh的电池管理着良好的电池运行时间,我们可以再次看到LTPS显示屏的影响,因为尽管分辨率很高,在调整亮度为150cd/M²(最大亮度的51%)的情况下,我们仍然记录了超过10(Wi-Fi测试)或11.5小时(视频测试)的实际运行时间。当你使用90赫兹模式时,Wi-Fi运行时间会缩短一小时左右,而当你使用最大亮度(60赫兹)时,电池会在7小时左右耗尽。

90瓦的电源适配器支持所谓的超级充电技术。当设备开启时,完全充电需要78分钟,但50%的容量只需28分钟就可以完成。

Wi-Fi测试(90 Hz和150 cd/m²)。
Wi-Fi测试(90 Hz和150 cd/m²)。
充电(设备开启
充电(设备开启
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 94)
10h 18min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 94)
6h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 35min
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8, 61 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
47%
-10%
-42%
-30%
55%
12%
H.264
693
626
-10%
401
-42%
786 ?(426 - 1153, n=31, last 2 years)
13%
WiFi v1.3
618
629
2%
538
-13%
366
-41%
430
-30%
960
55%
626 ?(303 - 1144, n=66, last 2 years)
1%
Load
95
182
92%
89
-6%
114.5 ?(61 - 197, n=49, last 2 years)
21%
Reader / Idle
1167
1299
1268 ?(581 - 2550, n=11, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 漂亮的设计和非常好的铝制外壳
+ 高的系统性能和良好的性能利用率
+ 非常好的2.5K触摸屏,90赫兹
+ 准确的色彩和全sRGB色域
+ 良好的键盘
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 电池运行时间长

Cons

- 没有Thunderbolt、PCIe 4.0或SD卡阅读器
- 坏的网络摄像头
- 负载下/充电时PSU温度高
- 有限的维护选项
- 不必要的SSD分区

结论 - 更好的MateBook X Pro

在审查中。华为MateBook 14s。测试模型由华为德国公司提供。
在审查中。华为MateBook 14s。测试模型由华为德国公司提供。

新的MateBook 14s在我们的审查中留下了良好的印象,它更接近于指定的旗舰机MateBook X ProMateBook 14.有一些小的改进,如屏幕上方的新摄像头位置,更高的面板分辨率,额外的HDMI输出以及改进的扬声器。铝制机身处于同样高的水平,我们喜欢可选颜色云杉绿。

英特尔的酷睿i7处理器并不真正令人信服。它基本上是一个标准的U系列处理器(如i7-1165G7或i7-1185G7),有四个核心,只是在35或45瓦的较高功率限制下运行。这几乎没有创新,但MateBook 14s的性能利用率至少是相当不错的。虽然华为没有包括现代技术,如Thunderbolt或PCIe 4.0,可能是出于成本原因。

新的MateBook 14s是一款非常好的次笔记本,也比之前的旗舰设备MateBook X Pro获得更好的评价。我们可以推荐MateBook 14s,因为它在许多方面都令人信服,只有少数缺点。

新的高分辨率,包括可选的90赫兹模式,可以创造出色彩准确的清晰图片,但在户外使用时,它可以更亮一点。3:2的长宽比对生产任务来说是很好的,但如果你经常看电影或流媒体视频,你可能最好选择16:10的设备,如戴尔XPS 9310瑜伽超薄7 Pro(它还提供更多的CPU功率)。然而,如果你正在寻找一个更轻、更紧凑的设备,我们推荐申克公司的Vision 14MacBook Air M1.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Huawei MateBook 14s i7 - 10/05/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
62 / 75 → 82%
Weight
70 / 20-75 → 90%
Battery
88%
Display
89%
Games Performance
69 / 78 → 89%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
89%
Audio
90 / 91 → 99%
Camera
28 / 85 → 33%
Average
80%
89%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为MateBook 14s i7笔记本评测--强大的副笔记本与3:2触摸屏
Andreas Osthoff, 2021-10- 7 (Update: 2021-10- 7)