Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 890M

AMD Radeon 890M

AMD Radeon 890M是一款功能强大的 RDNA 3+ 架构 iGPU，于 2024 年 6 月首次亮相。它配备 16 个计算单元（1024 个统一着色器），运行频率高达 2,900 MHz；与 700 系列 Radeon iGPU 一样，它支持多达 4 台显示器，分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。它的游戏性能足以应付任何 2023 或 2024 年的游戏，只要 1080p 分辨率和低细节即可。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameStrix Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
Man. Technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
CPU in Radeon 890MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 47512 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz3100 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 47512 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz3100 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 47012 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz3100 MHz
» show 6 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 3100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2.97 -12%
AMD Radeon 780M
2.99 -12%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.16 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.17 -6%
Intel Arc A310
3.17 -6%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.19 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3.24 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.27 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.35 -1%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.38
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
3.45 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3.46 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3.49 3%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.51 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
3.62 7%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
3.67 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3.72 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
3.78 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
3.82 13%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19 462%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 885%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 182     avg: 429.2     median: 482 (3%)     max: 575 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 298     avg: 543     median: 571 (4%)     max: 710 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 3198     avg: 3319     median: 3294 (8%)     max: 3511 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12236     avg: 19143     median: 21033 (11%)     max: 22270 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6855     avg: 7239     median: 7239 (8%)     max: 7623 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 8842     avg: 14320     median: 14813 (7%)     max: 16167 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4800     avg: 8268     median: 8431.5 (13%)     max: 9188 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5173     avg: 8932     median: 9040.5 (8%)     max: 10037 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 188288     avg: 289885     median: 301713 (33%)     max: 408901 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2203     avg: 3660     median: 3683.5 (10%)     max: 4073 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1950     avg: 3308     median: 3331 (7%)     max: 3676 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -97%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3155 -5%
AMD Radeon 880M
3193 -3%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3223 -3%
Intel Arc A310
3269 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3306 0%
AMD Radeon 890M
3308
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
3324 0%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
3364 2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3399 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3430 4%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
3492 6%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 6%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
3601 9%
Intel Arc A370M
3650 10%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 604%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 1254%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 290963     avg: 435187     median: 472994 (48%)     max: 513829 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 132276     avg: 209627     median: 222120 (26%)     max: 258947 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27248     avg: 37718     median: 38723 (37%)     max: 40511 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 29973     avg: 52132     median: 53495 (13%)     max: 58319 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 17828     avg: 29346     median: 30453 (29%)     max: 33268 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 18681     avg: 35392     median: 37159 (14%)     max: 40656 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8720     avg: 14198     median: 14421.5 (17%)     max: 16633 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8947     avg: 14871     median: 15284.5 (12%)     max: 17483 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
13714 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 -5%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
14147 -5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 -4%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
14428 -3%
AMD Radeon 880M
14453 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14692 -1%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
14725 -1%
AMD Radeon 890M
14871
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
15135 2%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15223 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
15433 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15592 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
15823 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
15837 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
16233 9%
Intel Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
16289 10%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
16564 11%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 359%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 773%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 27238     avg: 42369     median: 44128.5 (13%)     max: 47376 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 22391     avg: 37283     median: 38975.5 (21%)     max: 42086 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
34680 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
34951 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
35209 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
35807 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
36214 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
36405 -2%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36527 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -1%
AMD Radeon 890M
37283
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
37644 1%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
38502 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
38910 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 5%
Intel Arc A310
39213 5%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
39319 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
40134 8%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
40146 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
40643 9%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132443 255%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
173912 366%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 51961     avg: 61133     median: 60701 (66%)     max: 70657 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 31279     avg: 45631     median: 46785 (61%)     max: 50117 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 13.7     avg: 26.5     median: 28 (8%)     max: 31.6 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 59.49     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (11%)     max: 60.61 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 85.7     avg: 134.8     median: 139 (15%)     max: 153 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 46.32     avg: 60.8     median: 65.4 (18%)     max: 73.5 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 77.9     avg: 135     median: 142 (15%)     max: 156 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 19     avg: 25.9     median: 27.1 (4%)     max: 30.2 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 42     avg: 58.9     median: 59.5 (20%)     max: 67.2 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 24     avg: 37.6     median: 39 (19%)     max: 41.2 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 23     avg: 38.4     median: 40.9 (11%)     max: 46.5 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 39.2     avg: 65.2     median: 69.3 (7%)     max: 74.9 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 15.2     avg: 21.9     median: 24.2 (15%)     max: 26.1 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 31.3     avg: 53.6     median: 57.5 (8%)     max: 62.9 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 14     avg: 19.5     median: 16.8 (4%)     max: 28.5 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 21.4     avg: 33.2     median: 35.2 (16%)     max: 38.2 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 16.2     avg: 23.9     median: 25.6 (17%)     max: 27.4 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 13.4     avg: 22.9     median: 24.3 (8%)     max: 26.8 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 16665     avg: 21784     median: 23487 (17%)     max: 24937 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 111.9     avg: 220.3     median: 242 (14%)     max: 304 fps
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.7     avg: 37.7     median: 37.7 (14%)     max: 39.7 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 75.6     avg: 80.1     median: 80.1 (14%)     max: 84.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -96%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 -20%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 -19%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -19%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
65.5 -18%
Apple M3 9-Core GPU
67.6 -16%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -10%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -7%
AMD Radeon 880M
74.6 -7%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
78.8 -2%
AMD Radeon 890M
80.1
Intel Arc A310
80.5 0%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
83 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87.1 9%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
88 10%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
89.3 11%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
93.2 16%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
94.7 18%
Qualcomm Adreno 829
95 19%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 562%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 173.2     avg: 183.6     median: 183.6 (14%)     max: 194 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
211.6 fps (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
277.2 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
350 fps (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
496.9 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 470.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 3908 fps
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 78     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 546 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 26531     avg: 38069     median: 38547 (10%)     max: 43082 points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 30243     avg: 43998     median: 45676.5 (11%)     max: 50886 points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 583     avg: 957     median: 998 (4%)     max: 1075 Samples/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1166     avg: 1587     median: 1621 (3%)     max: 1743 Samples/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 9395     avg: 10599     median: 10562 (9%)     max: 12026 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.1     avg: 61.1     median: 59.1 (8%)     max: 74.8 Watt
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.8     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (8%)     max: 73.7 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.4613     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (47%)     max: 0.677 fps per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 35.5     avg: 58.5     median: 54.7 (15%)     max: 93.6 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.6     avg: 62.9     median: 60.7 (8%)     max: 91.8 Watt
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2178     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.62 fps per Watt
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 32.3     avg: 39.8     median: 40.6 (58%)     max: 49.7 dB(A)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
78.4 88.7 91.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.8 69.7 70 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3 48.4 52.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
11.5
9.8
Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Assassin's Creed Shadows

Assassin's Creed Shadows

2025
low 1920x1080
27 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Civilization 7

Civilization 7

2025
low 1920x1080
116 126.8 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.5 66.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.3 35.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

2025
low 1920x1080
25 29.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.5 22.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation 1920x1080
58.9
44.3
lowest, XeSS Quality 1920x1080
31.1
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
27.9
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

2024
low 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.5
Call of Duty Black Ops 6

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

2024
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
112
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
71.2
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
56.7
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
35.9
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
44.7
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
23.7
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
31 51 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24 40 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 31 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
52
low FSR 68 1280x720
66
Once Human

Once Human

2024
low 1920x1080
51.6 64.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.3 40.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2 34.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 30.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
110.7
The First Descendant

The First Descendant

2024
low 1920x1080
59.1 67.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35 42.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.8 33.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.6 28.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
103.3
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 48.4 49.8 68.4 73.5 82.4 83.6 85.1 85.3 86.6 87.2 87.3 87.5 87.8 89.4 92 94 100 104.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 43.9 46 67.3 72.8 74.8 75.4 76 76 76.4 76.8 77.3 77.6 78.9 80.9 84.7 88 91.9 94 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 31.6 34.4 50.9 51 53.4 53.4 54.2 55.8 56.6 56.9 57.1 58.5 58.6 59.3 60.1 61.2 66 67 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 8.4 9.5 12.5 13.6 13.8 13.9 14.1 14.3 14.3 14.9 15.2 15.7 15.8 17.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.5  fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4 27.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Quality FSR 2560x1440
26.4
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
26 30.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.7 27.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8 21.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7 19.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
81.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
168.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
90.3 99.7 100 101.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.9 74 81.9 82.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.3 50.7 63.2 63.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3 42.2 54.4 54.7 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
171.5
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
27.1 28.8 36.1 40 43 43.7 43.9 44.4 44.5 44.9 46 46 46 46.8 47.7 47.8 48 48.1 48.9 49.2 49.5 49.6 49.9 50.4 50.5 50.6 51.4 51.5 52.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.3 22.5 31.3 32.3 32.4 34.7 34.9 35.5 35.5 35.8 36.2 36.3 36.7 37.8 37.9 38 38.1 38.1 38.2 38.3 39.4 39.6 40.2 40.4 40.5 40.5 40.7 40.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.2 18.4 24.9 25.4 26.8 26.8 27.3 27.4 28.1 28.3 28.7 28.7 28.9 28.9 28.9 29.3 29.3 29.4 29.9 30.1 30.1 30.4 30.7 30.8 30.9 31.6 31.9 32.3 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5 15.6 21.5 23 23.1 23.8 23.9 24.1 24.4 24.9 25 25 25.1 25.1 25.4 25.5 25.5 25.5 26 26.2 26.2 26.5 26.6 26.7 26.8 27 27.8 28 28.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
76.7
82.2
85.1
72.5
80.3
77.1
82.6
78.3
74
83.4
71.3
84.9
80.8
46
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
5.2
6.4
8.2
7.3
5.5
7.5
Steam Deck 1280x800
81
77.7
60
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
32.3
29.4
26.7
30.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.5
25.3
20.9
24.9
27
25.1
23.8
24.2
17.4
24.9
24.7
22.8
23.2
23.3
21.8
28.7
25.4
23.9
23.8
25.1
21.8
23.6
12.5
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
26.8 26.8 35 35.8 38.8 39.8 40.2 41.1 41.3 43.7 44.1 44.5 44.6 44.8 44.9 45.2 45.4 45.7 46 46 46.2 47.1 48.5 48.6 48.7 49.5 49.8 50 51.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.4 21.3 29.1 29.2 31.5 31.8 32.1 33.6 34.1 34.2 34.5 34.6 35.4 35.6 35.6 35.8 35.8 35.9 36.4 36.9 37.5 37.7 37.8 37.9 38.2 38.2 38.7 39.8 40.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.9 18.8 24.1 25.6 26.8 27.1 27.9 28.2 28.5 28.5 28.6 28.8 28.9 29 29.4 29.4 29.4 29.9 30.2 30.2 30.8 30.9 30.9 31.2 31.6 31.8 32.1 32.8 33.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 18.6 19.7 24 24.9 25.5 26.5 27.4 27.5 27.9 28.1 28.3 28.4 28.4 28.7 28.9 29.1 29.1 29.6 29.7 30 30.7 30.7 31.1 31.3 31.5 32.5 32.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
64.2
58.9
73.4
55.2
67.9
59.4
60.7
68
65.1
76.6
71.1
75.6
82.1
41
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
41.9
47.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Armored Core 6

Armored Core 6

2023
low 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Atlas Fallen

Atlas Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

2023
low 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
72.8 88.3 106.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.3 76.4 96.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.6 58.6 70.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1 12.3 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 4 Remake

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3

2023
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Atomic Heart

Atomic Heart

2023
low 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy

2023
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Witcher 3 v4

The Witcher 3 v4

2023
low 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
112.5
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
81 99.2 101.6 106 106.3 107.3 110.1 110.5 111.2 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8 90.6 94.5 96.1 97.1 98.2 100.3 100.8 102.9 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.2 67.8 71.6 72.3 72.7 74.3 76.8 77 78.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 19 19.7 20.1 20.2 20.9 21.2 22 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
178.8
186.8
173.2
176.1
164.3
160.9
Ghostwire Tokyo

Ghostwire Tokyo

2022
med. 1920x1080
44.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
68.1 80 84.4 85.2 86.9 88.3 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.2 53.8 60.7 62.1 62.3 62.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 36.1 39.5 41.2 41.4 41.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.1 29.4 31.6 32.5 33 34.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
172.1
170.3
148.2
161.5
139.5
104.3
Farming Simulator 22

Farming Simulator 22

2021
low 1280x720
194.2 207 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
119.8 119.9 ~ 120 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79 82.8 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
77.6 78.3 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
172.6
171.6
Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5

2021
low 1280x720
141 160 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77 83 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69 73 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
91
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
179.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46 49 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
59
80
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
117.3 136.1 147.9 156 165.1 166.8 170.1 170.3 171.9 174.4 176.7 179.7 180.7 182.1 182.9 186.1 186.7 189.2 191.3 193 195.7 198 199.8 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.4 68.1 69.3 70.8 71.1 71.5 74.5 74.9 75.2 75.7 76.3 76.6 76.9 77.7 77.8 78.5 78.6 79 79.5 79.7 80.6 81.9 82 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51 56.1 58.7 59.4 59.7 60.2 60.8 63.6 63.8 63.8 64.3 64.8 65.1 65.2 65.2 65.9 66.1 66.7 67.3 67.8 68 68.6 69.8 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.8 48.3 48.5 49.8 51.2 51.4 51.4 54.2 54.2 54.2 54.2 54.6 54.6 55.4 55.7 56.1 56.1 56.4 56.5 57.6 58.4 58.8 59.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
75 80 81 92 92 93 98 98 98 98 101 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42 45 50 55 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39 42 46 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 55 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33 36 40 50 50 50 50 51 51 52 52 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
45.5 49.3 53.9 57.1 65.1 65.7 66.5 67.2 70.8 71.6 71.7 73.7 77.3 78.2 78.2 79.1 80 81 82.1 82.2 82.6 85.1 86.9 87 87.5 88.8 91.1 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.8 41.6 46.6 47.8 50.2 54.3 54.4 54.9 55 55 56 58.6 59.4 60 60.7 61.7 62.4 63.6 63.7 64.9 65 65.5 67.6 67.9 68 68.6 69.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.7 33.9 38.2 38.8 41.9 42.2 43 43.1 44 44.2 45.4 45.6 46.2 46.2 46.7 47.3 49.6 49.9 50.5 50.6 50.6 50.8 51 51.1 51.6 53.3 53.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
46.4 59 63.8 72.7 73 75.5 75.5 75.6 78.9 81.9 82.1 82.9 82.9 83.3 83.7 85.5 85.5 86 88.8 89 89.3 92.2 92.5 92.8 93.7 94.6 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.7 33.4 33.7 37 38.3 39.1 39.7 40.8 41.5 42.1 42.3 43.9 44 44.1 44.2 44.5 45.1 45.2 45.4 45.6 45.7 45.9 46.3 47 47.5 48.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.7 24.1 25.5 26.4 26.6 27.8 28.6 28.7 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.6 30.8 31.2 31.5 31.6 32 32.3 32.4 32.5 32.9 33.2 33.3 33.5 34.4 34.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
92.1 92.6 104.7 109.7 112.4 127.5 129.9 132.3 135.4 142.7 143.7 153.6 154.3 155.6 157.1 157.8 158 158.1 161.1 162.7 165.2 166.6 167.6 168.1 169.1 170.6 171.3 171.8 175.6 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
85.7 91.2 98.7 100.5 102.6 104 104.7 108.5 111.6 112.7 121.2 121.4 123.1 123.7 124 125.7 126.7 127.7 128 129 129.7 133.2 133.2 133.6 134.1 135.7 138.8 138.9 143.6 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.8 35.8 35.8 37.9 45.7 46.4 46.6 47.7 48.1 60.7 64.7 76.8 80.9 85.7 86.7 87.2 88.7 90 90 90.6 91.6 92.1 93 93.2 93.4 98.7 99.2 99.5 100 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.4 33.1 33.6 36 43.6 44.7 44.8 45.1 46.7 54.1 57.5 70.1 70.5 76.3 77.6 77.7 78.3 79.7 79.8 82 82.5 82.8 83.3 83.4 84.6 85 87.4 89.8 93 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
91.4 115.2 155 158.4 164 167 169 170.1 173 179.5 ~ 154 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
56.9 89.3 104.5 109.2 111.7 116.8 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.9 48 51 51 52 53.3 55 57.4 57.7 61.7 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.4 31 32 32.7 33 34 36.7 37 37.7 39.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
66.9
67.2
62.8
51.4
73.3
34
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
126.4 149.1 150.2 151 157.8 158.6 161 161.3 164.5 166.1 166.2 166.6 166.6 167 167.2 167.7 168.7 168.9 170.4 172.7 172.7 173 174.3 175.8 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115 129.6 132.9 143.5 145.9 150.1 151.3 152.7 154.1 154.9 156.4 157 157.2 158.7 158.9 159.9 160.8 161.5 162.6 167.6 167.7 170.9 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6 64.8 68.4 69.6 70.8 71.2 71.7 71.7 71.9 73.5 73.9 74 74.7 76 76.2 76.5 78.2 78.8 79 79.1 79.5 79.5 79.9 80.2 81.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9 29 29.5 29.7 29.7 30.3 30.4 30.6 31 31.1 31.1 31.2 31.4 31.4 31.5 31.6 31.9 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.7 32.8 33.1 33.2 33.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
10.1
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
146.1
143.2
145.5
139.7
127.8
140.4
134.2
139.9
130.2
136.7
139.1
137.4
153.1
136.4
149.7
151.4
152.8
81.6
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
150.4
146.6
150.9
139.9
137
142.2
138.6
141.6
131.4
136.7
140.5
136.4
150.8
138.5
146.2
150.5
156.5
76.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 776674914
Anno 117: Pax Romana33.619.313.28.3
F1 25866840
Doom: The Dark Ages20.317.315.8
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered49.329.219.78.54
Assassin's Creed Shadows28262214
Civilization 71216334
Monster Hunter Wilds272114
Kingdom Come Deliverance 219.916.313
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle29.118.8
Stalker 225.421.818.6
Call of Duty Black Ops 669624337
Until Dawn50.332.522.116.4
God of War Ragnarök41.134.330.624.9
Final Fantasy XVI22.722.718.8
Space Marine 23428.726.922.6
Star Wars Outlaws1614.712.5
Black Myth: Wukong41322518
Once Human58393228
The First Descendant63393126
F1 24797252136.46
Senua's Saga Hellblade 220.816.612.6
Ghost of Tsushima34.6292320
Horizon Forbidden West28261917
Dragon's Dogma 2
Last Epoch60.444.93830.2
Skull & Bones48413426
Helldivers 241.631.930.126.8
Enshrouded23.222.920.314.5
Palworld81.562.336.230.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown209168.4160.3
Ready or Not75.359.843.827.5
The Finals94.669.960.246.2
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22201712
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202377644943
Alan Wake 221.620.219.8
Lords of the Fallen26.123.918.713.2
Total War Pharaoh98775647
Assassin's Creed Mirage52444232
Counter-Strike 2117.390.752.335.8
Cyberpunk 207746362825
Baldur's Gate 343342928
Lies of P62.553.946.338.4
The Crew Motorfest40363026
Armored Core 649.843.340.133.1
Atlas Fallen
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart31.82621.520.9
F1 2389816214
Resident Evil 4 Remake
Company of Heroes 393.165.349.849.1
Atomic Heart59.34626.821.3
Returnal32302622
Hogwarts Legacy42.636.824.819.3
The Witcher 3 v460.246.740.935
F1 22104957320
Ghostwire Tokyo44.743.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands82593931
Farming Simulator 222011208178
Forza Horizon 5151807135
Total War: Three Kingdoms179.361.637.325.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11448453823
Strange Brigade175766454
Far Cry 591555047
X-Plane 11.11745946
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark81423022.8
Dota 2 Reborn1471207467
The Witcher 3154985233
GTA V1631537331
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		14
19
22
8		18
25
17
4		24
30
8
1		31
19
2
1		3





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 13. 21:10:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.012s ... 0.014s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.015s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12524 +0.032s ... 0.047s

#12 got single benchmarks 12524 +0.083s ... 0.13s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +1.998s ... 2.128s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 2.129s

#16 Got 1315 rows for game benchmarks. +0.227s ... 2.356s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.356s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.049s ... 2.405s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.649s ... 3.053s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.127s ... 3.18s

#21 return log +0s ... 3.18s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 890M graphics card

迷你论坛 AI X1 Pro

Minisforum AI X1 Pro 与 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 评测：用于办公、游戏和人工智能的迷你 PC 升级，内存是否存在瓶颈？

Minisforum 对 AI X1 Pro 进行了更新，现在又为这款小巧的动力装置配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470，带来了更强大的 APU，承诺提供更多储备，尤其是针对要求苛刻的工作负载和 AI 应用。但这款新处理器在实际应用中能否满足人们的高期望值呢？
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M, 1.3 kg
Peladn HO5

性价比最高的迷你 PC 评测：针对 Geekom 和 Minisforum 的内幕消息：Peladn HO5 搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和 Radeon 890M 的 Peladn HO5 是一款功能强大的迷你 PC，售价约为 1,000 美元。在我们的评测中，我们考察了性能、效率、体积和功能，包括 OCuLink。小巧的 Strix Point 电脑能否经得起 Minisforum 和 Geekom 的考验？
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 575 g
配备 144 Hz OLED 显示屏和可拆卸控制器的游戏掌上电脑 - 联想Legion Go 2 评测

配备 144 Hz OLED 显示屏和可拆卸控制器的游戏掌上电脑 - 联想Legion Go 2 评测

联想为其游戏手持设备配备了高品质的 OLED 面板和 AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme，使其性能更上一层楼。可拆卸的控制器依然包括在内。不过，其售价高达 1,499 欧元（约合 1777 美元），成为市场上最昂贵的掌上游戏机之一。
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, 8.8", 922 g
这是联想功能最强大的 16 英寸 AMD 笔记本电脑：配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 的 ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 评测

这是联想功能最强大的 16 英寸 AMD 笔记本电脑：配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 的 ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 评测

这是 AMD CPU 在 ThinkPad P 系列中的胜利回归：通过 Strix Point，联想让联想 ThinkPad P16s AMD 起死回生。全新的 P16s Gen 6 AMD 配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 Pro HX 370，这是笔记本电脑中最强大的 Strix Point CPU 之一。
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, Radeon 890M, 16", 2 kg
8 英寸游戏掌上电脑也配备 AMD - MSI Claw A8 评测

8 英寸游戏掌上电脑也配备 AMD - MSI Claw A8 评测

除了搭载英特尔处理器的 Claw 8 AI+ 游戏掌机外，微星现在还推出了搭载 AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme 处理器的版本。除了处理器，Claw A8 还换上了新的外壳。建议零售价仍为 999 欧元，但人体工学设计有所逊色。
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, 8", 765 g

Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.4 kg
  Review » 蓝宝石 Edge AI：搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和磁性盖子的迷你 PC 回归评测

Minisforum N5 Pro: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 5 kg
  Review » Minisforum N5 Pro：全球首款搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 的 AI NAS - IFA 2025 获奖评测

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » 游戏掌上设备的 Xbox 全屏体验--华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 评测

Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.7 kg
  Review » 有史以来最好的 Geekom 迷你 PC？Geekom A9 Max 评测，搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370，售价 999 美元

Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 AMD: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 评论 - 配备 AMD Zen 5 和 128 GB 内存的 Linux 超极本

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 21RV0017GE: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX 的最强 AMD 14 英寸 ThinkPad：联想 ThinkPad P14s 第 6 代 AMD 笔记本电脑评测

Acemagic F3A: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 1 kg
  Review » 搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、价格不到 700 美元的经济型迷你 PC - Acemagic F3A 的详细评测

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 框架笔记本 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 评测：跳过英特尔版本，获得更佳性能

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 10.95", 0.9 kg
  Review » XL 游戏掌上电脑、平板电脑和笔记本电脑：OneXplayer X1 Pro 评论

Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 1.4 kg
  Review » Minisforum AI X1 Pro 评测：适用于办公、多媒体、游戏和创意任务的全能迷你 PC

HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 EliteBook X G1a 14 AI 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 的超强商务笔记本电脑

GMK EVO-X1: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC 评测：采用 Oculink 和 Ryzen AI 9 的全新盒式设计

GPD Pocket 4: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

Minisforum EliteMini AI370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini AI370 评测：采用 AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU 的迷你 PC 树立了新标准

Beelink SER9: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 评测：AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 性能首次亮相：惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14 笔记本电脑评测

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

  Review » 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 21RV0017GE: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 21RV0017GE

Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606GA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606GA

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG

Lenovo Legion Go 2: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 8.80", 0.9 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion Go 2

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Xbox Ally X

MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 8.00", 0.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra 14

HP EliteBook X G1a: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G1a

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606

Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 1.3 kg
   » 小巧、高品质、强大的连接能力 - Minisforum AI X1 Pro（配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470）评测

Peladn HO5, AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.6 kg
   » 性能卓越，价格公道：Peladn HO5 迷你电脑性价比极高

Lenovo Legion Go 2: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 8.80", 0.9 kg
   » 联想的Legion Go 2 也配备了速度较慢的 AMD Ryzen Z2，但 SteamOS 仍需时日

   » 1500 欧元购买联想Legion Go 2 游戏掌上电脑和 Z2 Extreme 太贵了

MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 8.00", 0.8 kg
   » 微星Claw A8的新AMD版本比英特尔版本差，尽管价格相同

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » 仅一周后，Framework 笔记本电脑再次提价

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Strix Point ThinkPads 没有 OLED：联想人为地将其 AMD 型号限制在 WUXGA IPS 上

Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.4 kg
   » 蓝宝石 Edge AI 评测：搭载人工智能和 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的迷你 PC 复出

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » 微软全新 Xbox 全屏体验并未提高游戏性能

Minisforum N5 Pro: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 5 kg
   » Minisforum N5 Pro 评测--全球首款搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 的人工智能 NAS，荣获 IFA 2025 大奖

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   » 华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 供应疲软，表明微软对掌上游戏机信心不足

   » 华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X：目前市场上最舒适的游戏掌上电脑

Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 AMD: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 快速的 AMD 处理器、高达 128 GB 的内存和 Linux - InfinityBook Pro 14 在我们的评测中给人留下了良好印象

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 21RV0017GE: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 奇怪的分割：联想无缘无故从 Ryzen AI 9 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑中保留 2.8K OLED 屏幕

   » Ryzen 9 CPU 让这款联想 ThinkPad 脱颖而出：在所有 14 英寸 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑中，紧凑型移动工作站的 CPU 性能最高

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 10.95", 0.9 kg
   » OneXplayer X1 Pro：打了类固醇的任天堂 Switch

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布，配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相，配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
Quadro P4000
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Adreno 840 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Vega 3
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter