Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Nvidia GeForce MX250是专用于笔记本电脑的入门级移动图形卡。它与前代产品GeForce MX150 /台式机GeForce GT 1030基于相同的Pascal GP108芯片,但具有更高的频率。与MX150一样,MX250有两种版本,正常的25瓦版本(设备ID:1D13)和低功率的10瓦TDP(设备ID:1D25)和降低的性能(具有10W的MX150降低了32%频率)。 GDDR5内存接口现在还支持高达3.5 GHz = 7 GHz的有效速度(高于3 GHz)。

GP108芯片是三星(LPP)14 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括对DisplayPort 1.4,HDMI 2.0b,HDR的支持以及改进的H.265视频解编码和编码(PlayReady)。 3.0)。但是,由于需要至少3 GB的图形内存,因此无法运行带Netflix的4K HDR。与较大的Pascal芯片相比,GP108不支持用于VR和G-Sync的同时多投影(SMP)。完整的改进项目和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专门的Pascal架构文章里找到。

由于提高了核心频率(25瓦版本的Boost高达+ 3%,并且内存速度更快),新的MX250应该比旧的MX150稍强。基准测试表明性能增加了5%。新游戏只能在低设置下流畅地运行(有关游戏和基准,请参阅MX150的页面)。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce MX200 Series
GeForce MX250 384 @ 1518 - 1582 MHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX230 256 @ 1519 - 1531 MHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G2
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1518 - 1582 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology14 nm
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor
Date of Announcement20.02.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.geforce.com/hardware/noteboo...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
12.7 pt (13%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -89%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 -6%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 1%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 6%
AMD FirePro M5100 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 980     avg: 1184     median: 1223 (8%)     max: 1308 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 881     avg: 1071     median: 1105 (7%)     max: 1169 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 100071     avg: 204868     median: 221026 (41%)     max: 252549 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 22385     avg: 68911     median: 78819 (11%)     max: 81895 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 8009     avg: 13326     median: 13142.5 (20%)     max: 17955 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 19117     avg: 21864     median: 21943 (11%)     max: 23863 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 2737     avg: 3196     median: 3254 (11%)     max: 3567 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 2939     avg: 3537     median: 3662 (9%)     max: 3885 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 42088     avg: 80269     median: 86686 (12%)     max: 101192 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 3942     avg: 4682     median: 4858 (13%)     max: 5302 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 3593     avg: 4426     median: 4633 (9%)     max: 4942 points
...
AMD Radeon HD 6870 -5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000) -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
AMD Radeon Pro 450 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P600 5%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X 6%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 8%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
56769 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
17 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
43.6 fps (14%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
43.7 fps (19%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
58.9 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 136     avg: 141     median: 141.2 (23%)     max: 146.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 60     avg: 79.9     median: 79.9 (22%)     max: 99.7 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
40.2 fps (26%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
33.3 fps (14%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
66.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
79 fps (14%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 66     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (16%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 57     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (24%)     max: 69.9 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 505     avg: 629     median: 629 (6%)     max: 753 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 895     avg: 1173     median: 1172.5 (11%)     max: 1450 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 2804     avg: 2806     median: 2806 (10%)     max: 2808 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
min: 41.3     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (10%)     max: 47.6 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
45.2 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 35.6     avg: 51.7     median: 52.8 (12%)     max: 59.4 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1506     avg: 1589     median: 1579 (82%)     max: 1683 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
min: 549     avg: 926     median: 926 (53%)     max: 1303 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
20.9 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 15.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
25.6 29.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.2 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.7 41.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.7 20.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 18.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
41.7 43.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.3 23.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.4 19.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
65.2 66.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.4 25.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 20.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare