Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile是基于Turing架构的笔记本电脑中端图形卡。它使用与台式机版本相同的TU117芯片,但对于移动GPU,所有1024个着色器均已启用。与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1650 Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。

GTX 1650Ti有两种封装,带有128位内存总线和50瓦TGP的GB4D-128和带有256位内存总线和55瓦TGP的GB4B-256(与更快的RTX卡差不多) 。两种版本的频率似乎相同,因此256位版本应更快。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了射线追踪,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,同频性能增加50%,能效提高40%。

与较大的Turing芯片(例如GTX 1660 Ti的TU116和RTX系列)相比,TU117不包括新的NVENC编码器,而是较旧的类似于Pascal和Volta中使用的编码器。

Nvidia将笔记本电脑1650 Ti的功耗指定为50-80瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比GTX 1650高5-25瓦。GTX 1650 Ti的功率高效Max-Q型号额定值在35瓦TGP。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 @ 1.53 - 1.73 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.4 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1350 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.4 pt (23%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile -12%
AMD FirePro W7170M -11%
AMD FirePro M6100 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M395 9%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (Desktop) 332%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3738     avg: 3907     median: 3826 (22%)     max: 4201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3554     avg: 3682     median: 3609.5 (18%)     max: 3904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 393082     avg: 405955     median: 410191 (65%)     max: 414592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 97700     avg: 109711     median: 109711 (15%)     max: 121722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20269     avg: 28454     median: 28177 (37%)     max: 33407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 34971     avg: 59364     median: 65163 (32%)     max: 70377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8780     avg: 9206     median: 9139.5 (24%)     max: 9800 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9691     avg: 10082     median: 9881.5 (20%)     max: 10733 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 98715     avg: 110988     median: 110988 (15%)     max: 123260 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12192     avg: 13097     median: 13072.5 (34%)     max: 14125 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12865     avg: 13515     median: 13266 (23%)     max: 14415 Points
...
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q -15%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M -12%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH 6%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
9770 Samples/s (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
10574 Samples/s (38%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
7120 points (15%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
72.2 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
92.5 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 78     avg: 89.9     median: 93 (20%)     max: 99.1 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1530     avg: 1640     median: 1665 (87%)     max: 1725 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
58.7 fps 69.5 fps ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.7 fps 34.2 fps 37.4 fps ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.3 fps 27.9 fps 30 fps ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4 fps 23.2 fps 25.5 fps ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.5 fps  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
47 fps
39.9 fps
low 1280x720
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54 64 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38 46 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 45 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.4 53.4 fps ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49 51.1 fps ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.4 fps 42.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.8 fps  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.7 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.4 fps 58.3 fps ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.1 fps 42.2 fps ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3 fps 37.3 fps ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
85 87 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 49 52 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27 32 35 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 15 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
97 102 fps