Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Nvidia GeForce MX350是专用于笔记本电脑的入门级移动图形卡。它于2020年2月发布,基于与用于笔记本电脑的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050相同的GP107 Pascal芯片和640个着色器。内存总线被切成一半为64位(GDDR5)。

但是,第一批基准测试显示性能稍逊于GTX 1050,与GTX 960M相当。 Nvidia在产品页面上指出,MX350在i7-1065G7中提供的性能是Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7的2.5倍(而MX330为2倍)。因此,像The Division 2,Metro Exodus或Rage 2这样要求苛刻的2019年游戏只能在可接受的最低细节设置下运行。要求不高的游戏,例如FIFA 20,应该可以在高设置甚至1080p的条件下正常运行。但是,这始终也取决于所使用的处理器和内存。请参阅下面的详细游戏基准。

GP107-670-A1芯片采用三星14 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括DisplayPort 1.4(就绪),HDMI 2.0b,HDR,同时多投影(SMP)以及改进了H.265视频解码和编码(PlayReady 3.0)。完整的改进清单和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专用的Pascal架构结构文章中找到。

在新的Nvidia驱动程序驱动程序中,GeForce MX350的硬件ID为1C94。

我们测试中的功耗低于平均GTX 1050(甚至是Max-Q版本),并且与较旧的MX图形卡相似(如25 W的TGP所示)。因此,GPU适用于轻薄型笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce MX300 Series
GeForce MX450 N18S-G5 1024 64 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce MX350 640 @ 1354 - 1468 MHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 384 @ 1531 - 1594 MHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed1354 - 1468 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology14 nm
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks
Date of Announcement20.02.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
14.5 pt (15%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -90%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M385X -10%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M -8%
AMD FirePro M5100 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 -3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 1%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X 1%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000) 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 6%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 1522     avg: 1524     median: 1524 (10%)     max: 1526 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 1343     avg: 1357     median: 1356.5 (9%)     max: 1370 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 277187     avg: 282988     median: 282988 (52%)     max: 288789 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 79699     avg: 82677     median: 82677 (11%)     max: 85655 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 14094     avg: 15512     median: 15511.5 (23%)     max: 16929 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 24723     avg: 24734     median: 24733.5 (13%)     max: 24744 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 3944     avg: 4018     median: 4036 (14%)     max: 4074 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 4340     avg: 4405     median: 4417 (11%)     max: 4457 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 82040     avg: 89299     median: 89298.5 (12%)     max: 96557 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 6376     avg: 6447     median: 6397 (17%)     max: 6569 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 6135     avg: 6245     median: 6151 (12%)     max: 6448 points
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P620 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7870 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
AMD Radeon Pro 460 8%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 9%
AMD Radeon R9 M390 9%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 10%
...
0%
100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
19.6 fps (12%)
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
458 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
1582 Samples/s (15%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
3661 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
min: 49.9     avg: 54.3     median: 54.3 (12%)     max: 58.6 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
min: 49.4     avg: 50.1     median: 50.1 (11%)     max: 50.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
59 Watt (13%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1314 MHz (68%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
1341 MHz (77%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Death Stranding

Death Stranding

2020
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
128 141.5 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 52.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.1 32.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
40.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59.1 59.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.7 25.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.9 77.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.2 36.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.6 36.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.1 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
27 42.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.7 19.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
26.2 36.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4 28.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46.5 51.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 29.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8 24.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50.3 54.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.4 32.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 22.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 19.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59.4 71.9 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.4 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8 26.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
104  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare