Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

AMD Radeon RX 5500M(或RX 5500移动显卡)是基于Navi 14芯片(RDNA架构)的移动中端图形卡,该芯片采用现代7纳米工艺制造。它具有1,408个内核,时钟频率为1,645 MHz(最大Boost,最大游戏时钟为1448 MHz)和GDDR6图形内存(14 Gbps)。

Navi 14芯片使用了新的RDNA(Radeon DNA)微体系结构,它是GCN指令集的后继产品。它具有新的处理器设计,多级缓存层次结构和改进的渲染管线,并支持GDDR6内存。

根据AMD的说法,RX5500M的性能应介于Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q和普通的GeForce GTX 1660 Ti之间。这意味着它适合在1080p画质下运行大型游戏。 AMD指出5500M的性能应达到台式机Radeon 5500的4.6 TFLOPS(理论值),而台式机Radeon 5500的性能应达到5.2(+ 12%)。在我们的MSI Alpha 15游戏基准中,RX 5500M平均而言它比旧GTX 1060(移动版)慢一些,因此在GTX 1650和GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q之间。

该芯片的TDP为85瓦,比频率较低的Radeon RX5300M高20瓦。在游戏中,芯片的功耗介于64到105瓦之间(使用HWInfo64记录的Ghost Recon)。在MSI Alpha 15中,功耗明显高于GTX 1060和GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q,仅略低于正常的台式机GTX 1660 Ti(在The Witcher 3中使用外部监视器测量)。

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon RX 5000M Series
Radeon RX 5700M 2304 @ 1.72 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5600M 2304 @ 1.27 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5500M 1408 @ 1.33 - 1.65 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon RX 5300M 1408 @ 1.04 - 1.45 GHz96 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameNavi 14 / R19M-E85
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA
Pipelines1408 - unified
Core Speed1327 - 1645 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12, Shader 6.4
Transistor Count6400 Million
technology7 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.0b, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90 decode)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement29.09.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.1 pt (23%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile -11%
AMD FirePro W7170M -10%
AMD FirePro M6100 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M395 10%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 332%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4024     avg: 4395     median: 4408.5 (25%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4167     avg: 4293     median: 4314.5 (22%)     max: 4376 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600 -97%
...
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) -10%
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 -8%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) -5%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 8%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury 10%
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 14%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 21%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 207184     avg: 210925     median: 210925 (33%)     max: 214666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
58800 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 21898     avg: 28006     median: 22627 (30%)     max: 39492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46119     avg: 52163     median: 49056 (24%)     max: 64420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 10080     avg: 10834     median: 10890 (28%)     max: 11476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 11754     avg: 12265     median: 12276 (24%)     max: 12753 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63569 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12449     avg: 13977     median: 13081.5 (31%)     max: 16271 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 16302     avg: 16749     median: 16613 (28%)     max: 17668 Points
...
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q -5%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) 2%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) 3%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 7%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) 7%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 253%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1275     avg: 1436     median: 1436 (15%)     max: 1597 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3002     avg: 3411     median: 3411 (11%)     max: 3820 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
9581 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
136 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 123     avg: 133     median: 128 (28%)     max: 148 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1650     avg: 1684     median: 1654 (86%)     max: 1747 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1519 MHz (77%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
med. 1920x1080
84.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
113
med. 1920x1080
36.4 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.2 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.5 fps  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.4 fps  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
44.2
med. 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
58.3 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.6 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.3 fps  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.5 fps  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
104 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.3 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.6 fps  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1 fps  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
2.3 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
85  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
104  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66.4 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.1 fps