Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX230

NVIDIA GeForce MX230

Nvidia GeForce MX230是一款入门级笔记本电脑独立显卡,具有(最有可能)基于Pascal架构的DirectX 12支持(FL 12_1)(而不是较旧的MX130的Maxwell)。类似于更强的MX250,MX230也基于GP108芯片。

特征

GP108芯片以三星(LPP)14 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括对DisplayPort 1.4,HDMI 2.0b,HDR的支持以及改进的H.265视频解编码和编码(PlayReady)。 3.0)。但是,由于需要至少3 GB的图形内存,带有Netflix的4K HDR无法运行。与较大的Pascal芯片相比,GP108不支持用于VR和G-Sync的同时多投影(SMP)。完整的改进项目和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专用的Pascal体系结构文章中找到。

性能

得益于更新的Pascal架构,MX230明显比旧的GeForce MX130(基于Maxwell)强。 2019年硬件要求高的游戏只能以最低的分辨率和细节设置运行,并且可能会有些卡顿(例如,我们的基准测试中Anno 1800或Rage 2只能以低于30fps的帧率运行)。但是,要求较低的游戏(如《守望先锋》,《FIFA 19》或《火箭联盟》)可以在不卡顿的情况下以更高的细节和分辨率设置运行(请参见下面的基准测试)。

能耗

MX230是三星的14nm工艺,由于着色器数量少且只有64位内存总线,因此功耗非常低。因此,该芯片可以用于轻薄型笔记本电脑。在我们的功率测试中,性能较强的MX250的功率高上22%(Furmark负载),而较旧的MX130的功率则高上38%。UHD Graphics 620平的功耗只低了17%,而性能却要差得多。

GeForce MX200 Series
GeForce MX250 384 @ 1.52 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX230 256 @ 1.52 - 1.53 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G0
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines256 - unified
Core Speed1519 - 1531 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Transistor Count1.8 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesVulcan 1.1, GPU Boost 3.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, GeForce Experience, GameWorks
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement20.02.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.geforce.com/hardware/noteboo...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
7.1 pt (8%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -87%
...
Intel Iris Graphics 550 -8%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 -8%
AMD FirePro W5130M -7%
AMD FirePro W4170M -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P520 2%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 5%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 786     avg: 851     median: 839.5 (4%)     max: 937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 698     avg: 758     median: 748 (3%)     max: 837 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -85%
...
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) -16%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) -16%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -11%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 -4%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
AMD Radeon 540X 5%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 15%
AMD Radeon Pro 450 26%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 163728     avg: 178637     median: 183041 (24%)     max: 189141 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 35141     avg: 61903     median: 74932 (10%)     max: 75636 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8886     avg: 10432     median: 10529.5 (13%)     max: 11659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13376     avg: 15921     median: 15796.5 (6%)     max: 17999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2041     avg: 2300     median: 2298.5 (6%)     max: 2531 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2168     avg: 2479     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2755 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 49120     avg: 78716     median: 84971 (11%)     max: 95803 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3316     avg: 3590     median: 3621.5 (7%)     max: 3720 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3180     avg: 3392     median: 3363.5 (5%)     max: 3582 Points
...
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs -7%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) -4%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M -2%
AMD Radeon R9 M375 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 3%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
18399 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4095     avg: 5887     median: 6353 (5%)     max: 6748 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
64.7 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 79.7     avg: 84.3     median: 83.4 (22%)     max: 92.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
176 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
91 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
38 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
45 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
583 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1069 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2018 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.8 Watt (5%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
46.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
73.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
39.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.5 61 67.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3 16.6 19.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8 7.9 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.5 4.9 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
22.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
45.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare