惠普EliteBook 840 G9笔记本电脑评测。联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon的替代品

EliteBook 840 G9是EliteBook 845 G9的英特尔版本,我们最近曾在两种不同的配置中对其进行了评测。在这个评论页面,我们将重点关注EliteBook 840 G9 Core i7-1280P配置的性能,因为关于机箱、键盘、可维修性和其他物理属性的细节可以在我们的 现有的AMD评测页面.
由于EliteBook集成了更多的可选功能,所以SKU的选择要比大多数消费类笔记本电脑广泛得多。CPU的范围从Core i5-1250P到Core i7-1280P,250-nit到1000-nit显示器,以及8到64GB的内存和其他辅助选项,如图所示。.我们的特定评测单元配备了最高级别的酷睿i7-1280P处理器,但配备了中级别的400尼特面板和16GB内存,价格略低于3000美元。
EliteBook 840 G9的替代品包括其他旗舰级14英寸商务副本,如 联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10或 戴尔Latitude 9430或 Latitude 7420.
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
| Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 19.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 980 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | 
外壳 - 与EliteBook 845 G9相同
虽然机箱在视觉上与EliteBook 845 G9相同,但只要看一下左侧边缘的USB-C端口,就能轻易区分这两种型号。840 G9的端口旁边会有一个Thunderbolt标签,而由AMD驱动的845 G9由于缺乏支持,完全省略了这个标签。
对于维修,惠普有一个,整个视频指南从头到尾介绍了如何拆卸和更换该机型的每个主要部件。这是我们希望其他主要制造商在未来能够效仿的做法,以消除终端用户的所有猜测。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
沟通
英特尔AX211是大多数840 G9配置的标准配置,因为这毕竟是一个由英特尔驱动的系列。相比之下,由AMD驱动的845 G9采用了高通Fast Connect 6900来提供同样的Wi-Fi 6E功能。根据我们对华硕AXE11000路由器的测试,两者的整体性能相当。
广域网是可选的,可以选择英特尔XMM 7560 R+ LTE或5000 5G。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
网络摄像头
5MP网络摄像头可能没有最近的8MP网络摄像头那么清晰。 蜻蜓书桌G3但它仍然明显优于大多数其他笔记本电脑上的1MP或2MP网络摄像头。在这方面,惠普已经走在了前列。
网络摄像头滑块快门是增加隐私的标准配置,而支持Hello的红外传感器是可选的。

配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。令人失望的是,标准保修期只有一年,而大多数竞争性的戴尔Latitude ,则是三年。
显示屏 - 颜色很好,响应时间慢
惠普提供七种不同的面板选择。
- 250尼特,无WWAN
- 250尼特,WWAN
- 400尼特,低蓝光,无WWAN
- 400尼特,低蓝光,WWAN
- 250尼特,触摸屏,无WWAN
- 1000尼特,低蓝光,Sure View,WWAN
- 250尼特,触摸屏,WWAN
- 1000尼特,低蓝光,Sure View,无WWAN
我们下面的测量结果只反映了上面加粗的选项。值得注意的是,所有的面板都是1920 x 1200雾面IPS 60 Hz,没有OLED选项。不幸的是,无论用户是否喜欢,Sure View都与1000尼特的面板选项联系在一起。
除了上述限制,我们单位的奇美面板在色彩覆盖和对比度方面是一个高品质的面板。它最大的缺点是黑白和灰白的反应时间非常慢,有明显的重影现象。虽然在办公室或以商业为中心的笔记本电脑上并不罕见,但它们在这里却慢得惊人,以至于在浏览网页或视频流时都会分心。
| 
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 391.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.49 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 0.44
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
69.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
67.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
CCT: 6488 K
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 Chi Mei CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA InfoVision X140NV4J, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U R140NW4D R0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Chi Mei CMN1416 CHF07 140HCG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -0% | 1% | 23% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 67.6 | 69  2% | 68  1% | 68.7  2% | 98.4  46% | 68  1% | 
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.7 | 99  0% | 97.6  -1% | 99.5  1% | 99.9  1% | 99  0% | 
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 69.7 | 70  0% | 69.3  -1% | 70.2  1% | 85.9  23% | 70  0% | 
| Response Times | 54% | 33% | 12% | 38% | 31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 66 ? | 31 ?  53% | 48 ?  27% | 55.2 ?  16% | 47.5 ?  28% | 55 ?  17% | 
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 46.4 ? | 21 ?  55% | 28.8 ?  38% | 43.2 ?  7% | 24.5 ?  47% | 26 ?  44% | 
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| Screen | -41% | -69% | -5% | -63% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 391.3 | 678  73% | 466.4  19% | 421.9  8% | 341  -13% | 408  4% | 
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 368 | 745  102% | 426  16% | 420  14% | 305  -17% | 378  3% | 
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 69  -20% | 84  -2% | 87  1% | 87  1% | 86  0% | 
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.32 | 0.33  -3% | 0.32  -0% | 0.29  9% | 0.26  19% | 0.22  31% | 
| Contrast (:1) | 1223 | 2055  68% | 1458  19% | 1455  19% | 1312  7% | 1855  52% | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.49 | 3.56  -139% | 2.84  -91% | 1.69  -13% | 3.11  -109% | 1.54  -3% | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.29 | 7.23  -120% | 4.73  -44% | 3.55  -8% | 8.29  -152% | 2.72  17% | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.44 | 1.05  -139% | 2.27  -416% | 0.5  -14% | 0.83  -89% | 1.08  -145% | 
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.93  -190% | 3.7  -118% | 2.8  -65% | 5.3  -212% | 1.95  -15% | 
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.63 84% | 2.13 103% | 2.13 103% | 2.037 108% | 2.33 94% | 
| CCT | 6488 100% | 7114 91% | 6886 94% | 6442 101% | 7571 86% | 6806 96% | 
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% / 
						-18% | -12% / 
						-40% | 3% / 
						-2% | -1% / 
						-30% | 8% / 
						0% | 
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 35.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
| In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 最快的Core i7 P系列选项
测试条件
处理器
由于系统的Turbo Boost潜力有限,CPU的性能是一个混合包。例如,当循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,最初的1992分在运行一次后会明显下降到1458分,表示性能下降了27%。这一降幅比大多数其他笔记本电脑,甚至包括许多酷睿U系列机型都要大。相比之下,Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS在整个压力测试中,EliteBook 845 G9的性能结果稳定。
许多其他具有相同 酷睿i7-1280P由于其更强大的冷却解决方案,能够提供比我们的惠普更快的性能。较大的 MSI Summit E16 Flip例如,它的多线程性能比我们的EliteBook 840 G9快25%到50%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
| Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=109) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (7466 - 13068, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (38904 - 66081, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (1826 - 2992, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (80180 - 100358, n=6) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (5880 - 8571, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (18907 - 32766, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (40691 - 99367, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (540 - 880, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (4006 - 7184, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (36663 - 48416, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5410 - 5994, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9719 - 10920, n=4) | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6301 - 7453, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6450 - 7180, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1677 - 1773, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1585 - 1709, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1849 - 1928, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1394 - 1746, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5994 points | |
| Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (56337 - 73486, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (63221 - 73719, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (58729 - 68247, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1280P (93.1 - 153.3, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了一个512GB的 SK hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速率分别高达7000 MB/s和5000 MB/s。然而,由于温度的限制,持续读取率稍慢,为5800 MB/s。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 高于平均水平的Iris Xe 96 EUs
尽管酷睿i7-1280P采用了相同的集成式 Iris Xe 96 EUs虽然酷睿i7-1165G7或酷睿i7-1265U采用了相同的集成Iris Xe 96 EUs图形处理器,但由于Core-P CPU具有更高的热包络,所以惠普的图形性能略快。因此,用户可以期待比一般Iris Xe 96 EU驱动的笔记本电脑快15%到25%的帧率。降级到酷睿i5配置的 Iris Xe 80 EUs将会导致图形性能下降20%到30%。
有趣的是,我们的英特尔GPU的性能超过了竞争对手的 Radeon 680M尽管Radeon 680M在其他笔记本电脑上运行得更快,如EliteBook 845 G9。联想Yoga 7 14.很明显,EliteBook中的集成Radeon GPU表现不佳。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7668 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23045 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5252 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2046 points | |
| Help | ||
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 108.6 | 97.3 | 23.4 | 10.2 | 
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 100.1 | 59.3 | 35 | 16.4 | 
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.3 | 84.9 | 68.8 | 61.8 | 
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46.9 | 26.1 | 18.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 46.1 | 34.5 | 33.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 95.1 | 43.4 | 35.9 | 27.4 | 
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 19.6 | 16.8 | 13 | 10.8 | 
排放 - 凉爽和安静
系统噪音
风扇的噪音和行为与我们在该型号的AMD版本上记录的情况类似。在运行较重的负载时,内部风扇在尽可能长时间地保持空闲方面做得很好。例如,运行一次3DMark 06的第一个基准场景,在24dB(A)的无声背景下,风扇噪音仅为32dB(A)。在反复运行后,风扇最终会稳定在39dB(A)左右,只有暂时性的脉冲,最高可达45dB(A)。总的来说,风扇的噪音比我们在去年的EliteBook 840 Aero G8上记录的还要大。 EliteBook 840 Aero G8它使用的是较慢的第11代酷睿U系列CPU。
Noise level
| Idle |  |  24.5 / 24.5 / 26 dB(A) | 
| Load |  | 32.3 / 44.7 dB(A) | 
|  | ||
| 30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud | ||
| min:   , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV1T02 | LG Gram 14Z90Q Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 13% | 3% | -1% | -8% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.3 | 25.5  -5% | 24.1  1% | 23.2  5% | 25  -3% | 25.3  -4% | 
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.5  -4% | 24.2  1% | 23.2  5% | 26  -6% | 25.3  -3% | 
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.5  -4% | 24.2  1% | 23.2  5% | 27  -10% | 25.3  -3% | 
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 25.5  2% | 24.2  7% | 23.2  11% | 28  -8% | 25.3  3% | 
| Load Average * (dB) | 32.3 | 38.1  -18% | 26.9  17% | 38.6  -20% | 35  -8% | 44.9  -39% | 
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 39 | 27.9  28% | 38.5  1% | 36  8% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 44.7 | 44  2% | 29.9  33% | 38.3  14% | 36  19% | 44.9  -0% | 
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.2 °C / 73.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+4.4 °C / 7.9 F).
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Intel Core i5-1145G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -42% | -42% | -13% | -26% | -18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 32.8 | 49.4  -51% | 39.2  -20% | 41.2  -26% | 43  -31% | 37.1  -13% | 
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 36.6 | 48  -31% | 51.2  -40% | 41  -12% | 45  -23% | 38.7  -6% | 
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 21.6 | 30.8  -43% | 33  -53% | 23.2  -7% | 27  -25% | 27.3  -26% | 
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 22.2 | 31.4  -41% | 34  -53% | 23.4  -5% | 28  -26% | 28.1  -27% | 
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95时,CPU将提升到3 GHz和60 W,持续约20秒或直到核心温度达到86 C。此后,它将下降到只有1.6 GHz和30 W,以保持65 C的冷却核心温度。
运行时的GPU时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1397 MHz和66 C,相比之下,1097 MHz和65 C在 蜻蜓笔记本G3配备了相同的集成GPU。更高的时钟速率有助于推动EliteBook在图形性能方面超过大多数Core U供电的笔记本电脑。
用电池供电运行会稍微降低性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为13157和6717分,而在主电源上则为15376和7101分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 32 | 
| Prime95压力 | 1.7 | -- | 56 | 
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.4 | 599 | 58 | 
| Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.8 | 1397 | 66 | 
HP EliteBook 840 G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
我们下面的对比表显示,AMD版本比我们的英特尔设备要求更高。然而,这种差异主要归因于AMD版本的1000尼特面板,而我们的英特尔版本使用的是要求较低的400尼特面板。在桌面上以最大亮度设置空转,英特尔和AMD的设备将分别消耗约9W和18W。当考虑到这一点时,尽管两款机型在性能上存在差异,但其总体功耗差异变得更加微小。
在运行Prime95压力时,我们能够从小型(约8.8 x 5.3 x 2.1厘米)的65瓦交流适配器上记录到68瓦的最大功耗。如下图所示,由于散热限制,这一速率只是暂时的。
| Off / Standby |   0.44 / 0.7 Watt | 
| Idle |    2.2 / 5.3 / 8.5 Watt | 
| Load |   54.3 / 67.3 Watt | 
|         | |
| Key: 
							min:   ,
							med:  ,
							max:  Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -80% | 5% | -8% | -5% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.2 | 6.4  -191% | 3.2  -45% | 2.8  -27% | 3  -36% | 2.7  -23% | 
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.3 | 12.4  -134% | 5.4  -2% | 6  -13% | 6  -13% | 6  -13% | 
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.5 | 18  -112% | 6.9  19% | 10.9  -28% | 12  -41% | 7.6  11% | 
| Load Average * (Watt) | 54.3 | 63  -16% | 38.9  28% | 51.8  5% | 40  26% | 37  32% | 
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 51 | 63.6  -25% | 37  27% | 51.6  -1% | 36.5  28% | 33.2  35% | 
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 67.3 | 68  -1% | 66.5  1% | 55.6  17% | 63  6% | 65  3% | 
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命--比AMD略短
当两者都设置为150 nit亮度和平衡电源配置文件时,WLAN运行时间比我们在AMD驱动的EliteBook 845 G9上记录的时间短了近两个小时。即便如此,7.5小时的连续浏览对大多数用户来说应该是令人满意的。
从空电到满电的充电速度很快,大约90分钟。第三方USB-C充电器在技术上是支持的,但如果它们的输出水平与所附的惠普充电器(20V/3.25A)不匹配,许多充电器就不能保证工作。
| HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 22% | 50% | -13% | 57% | 86% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.6 | 9.3  22% | 11.4  50% | 6.6  -13% | 11.9  57% | 14.1  86% | 
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.6 | ||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 24.8 | 28.9 | 23.5 | 
Pros
Cons
结论--好处和坏处
酷睿i7-1280P EliteBook 840 G9能否在Ryzen 9 Pro 6950HS面前站稳脚跟? EliteBook 845 G9?就原始的CPU潜力而言,AMD型号是一种方式,因为它的性能不会像英特尔型号那样被扼杀。然而,在图形性能方面,AMD模型中的Radeon 680M似乎表现不佳,以至于落后于Iris Xe 96 EUs。因此,更好的选择将取决于你的具体工作负载的CPU或GPU密集度如何。
除了处理器的差异外,AMD机型的电池寿命更长,而英特尔机型则得益于对Thunderbolt的支持。不幸的是,Sure View被强制安装在所有1000尼特的面板选项上,因为一些用户可能根本不想要这个隐私功能,因为它对图像质量的影响甚至在关闭时也是如此。对于未来的机型,我们希望看到面板有更快的响应时间,以减少重影,也许有更高的核心温度上限,以挤出更多的英特尔CPU的涡轮增压性能。
价格和可用性
HP EliteBook 840 G9
 - 12/17/2022  v7 (old)
Allen Ngo




























































