Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

用于笔记本电脑的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650是基于Turing架构(TU117芯片)的移动图形卡。与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1650没有集成Raytracing或Tensor内核。性能应该比旧的GeForce GTX 1050 Ti强一点。与台式机版本相比,笔记本版GTX1650的TU117芯片有1024个着色器。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令增加50%,能耗提高40%。

与较大的Turing芯片(例如GTX 1660 Ti的TU116和RTX系列)相比,TU117不包括新的NVENC编码器,而是较旧的类似于Pascal和Volta中使用的编码器。

Nvidia将笔记本电脑1650的功耗定为50瓦TGP(总图形功率),比1650的Max-Q版本高15瓦。TU117芯片采用12nm FFN台积电工艺。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G0, N18P-G61
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1395 - 1560 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
24.5 pt (25%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile -9%
AMD FirePro W7170M -9%
AMD FirePro M6100 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 9%
AMD Radeon R9 M395 9%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 3080     avg: 3572     median: 3607.5 (24%)     max: 3751 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 2909     avg: 3472     median: 3496 (23%)     max: 3700 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 200727     avg: 324981     median: 364872 (69%)     max: 389909 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 57517     avg: 91494     median: 82623.5 (11%)     max: 141041 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 16079     avg: 24611     median: 24920 (37%)     max: 30573 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 38016     avg: 55547     median: 58011 (30%)     max: 66073 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 6909     avg: 8041     median: 8075 (27%)     max: 8581 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 7741     avg: 9217     median: 9303.5 (23%)     max: 9621 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 60813     avg: 109358     median: 103944 (14%)     max: 161091 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 10546     avg: 11791     median: 11828 (31%)     max: 13143 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 10885     avg: 13060     median: 13214 (26%)     max: 13575 points
...
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q -12%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH 10%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 10%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
24001 Points (45%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
40.4 fps (24%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
101 fps (33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
97.6 fps (43%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
120 fps (23%)
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
331 fps (53%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
209 fps (57%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
60 fps (38%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
87.1 fps (36%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
60 fps (29%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
226 fps (39%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 170.1     avg: 177     median: 177.1 (41%)     max: 184.1 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 60     avg: 99     median: 99 (37%)     max: 137.9 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1294     avg: 1479     median: 1478.5 (15%)     max: 1663 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 2474     avg: 2873     median: 2872.5 (27%)     max: 3271 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 6891     avg: 6931     median: 6931 (25%)     max: 6971 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
95 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
93.7 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 82     avg: 93.8     median: 93.6 (21%)     max: 109 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1635     avg: 1643     median: 1642.5 (86%)     max: 1650 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
1273 MHz (73%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
191.1 260 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94 98.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.7 65.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.9 48.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
151.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
144.4 152 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.8 57.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.4 48.3 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121 121.2 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.6 82 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.4 67.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.8 62.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63.4 93.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.8 50.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1 33.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
69.6 71.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.8 64 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1 54.5 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.3  fps