Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

AMD Vega 3

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3是用于笔记本电脑的集成GPU。它用于入门级Ryzen 3 APU,于2018年初推出。GPU基于Vega架构(第5代GCN),具有3个CU(= 704个着色器中的192个),主频高达1100 MHz。性能取决于TDP(默认12-25 W),时钟,散热和内存配置。 GPU应该受益于快速双通道DDR4-2400 RAM(DDR4-2133可能会情况不同)。

Vega架构相对于Polaris一代提供了一些改进,现在支持DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1。有关Raven Ridge架构的文章中提供了更多信息。

目前我们估计性能与GeForce 910M相当。因此,较新的游戏可能无法流畅地运行。

由于14nm工艺和巧妙的省电功能,功耗相对较低(根据AMD的说法),因此显卡可用于轻薄笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerAMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega Series
RX Vega 64 4096 @ 1630 MHz2048 Bit @ 945 MHz
RX Vega 56 3584 @ 1138 - 1474 (Boost) MHz409.6 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vega Mobile 1792 2048 Bit
Vega M GH 1536 @ 1063 - 1190 (Boost) MHz
Vega M GL / 870 1280 @ 931 - 1011 (Boost) MHz
WX Vega M GL 1280 @ 931 - 1011 (Boost) MHz
Vega 11 704 @ 1240 (Boost) MHz
Vega 10 640 @ 1300 (Boost) MHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1300 (Boost) MHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1200 (Boost) MHz
Vega 7 448 @ 1600 (Boost) MHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1100 (Boost) MHz
Vega 5 320 @ 1400 (Boost) MHz
Vega 3 192 @ 1000 (Boost) MHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1100 (Boost) MHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed1000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
Transistor Count4500 Million
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement07.01.2018
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2 x 2600 MHz, 15 W? MHz1200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2 x 2500 MHz, 15 W? MHz1000 MHz
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2 x 2500 MHz, 15 W? MHz1000 MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? - ? MHz1000 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 335     avg: 405     median: 424 (3%)     max: 455 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 296     avg: 360     median: 379 (3%)     max: 405 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 71968     avg: 84670     median: 85357 (16%)     max: 95999 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 39462     avg: 47378     median: 47779 (7%)     max: 54893 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 5447     avg: 6012     median: 5655 (8%)     max: 7154 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 7049     avg: 8873     median: 9391 (5%)     max: 10651 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 877     avg: 1098     median: 1162 (4%)     max: 1279 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 969     avg: 1209     median: 1259 (3%)     max: 1435 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 62065     avg: 74919     median: 77483 (10%)     max: 85209 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 1329     avg: 2314     median: 1840 (5%)     max: 5190 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1239     avg: 1606     median: 1501 (3%)     max: 1936 points
...
AMD Radeon HD 8670D -4%
Intel UHD Graphics 617 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics -1%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 0%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon R5 M320 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M330 5%
Intel HD Graphics 630 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M 6%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
27308 Points (14%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
15885 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
4.4 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
13.9 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
9 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
21.2 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
26 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
25.5 fps (7%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
21.5 fps (5%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
21.3 fps (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 154     avg: 180     median: 179.5 (3%)     max: 205 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 292     avg: 346     median: 346 (3%)     max: 400 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 933     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (4%)     max: 1083 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
28 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
32 Watt (7%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
688 MHz (40%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
low 1280x720
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
15.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
14.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
42.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
72.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
106.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
37.6 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720