Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

AMD Vega 3

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3是用于笔记本电脑的集成GPU。它用于入门级Ryzen 3 APU,于2018年初推出。GPU基于Vega架构(第5代GCN),具有3个CU(= 704个着色器中的192个),主频高达1100 MHz。性能取决于TDP(默认12-25 W),时钟,散热和内存配置。 GPU应该受益于快速双通道DDR4-2400 RAM(DDR4-2133可能会情况不同)。

Vega架构相对于Polaris一代提供了一些改进,现在支持DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1。有关Raven Ridge架构的文章中提供了更多信息。

目前我们估计性能与GeForce 910M相当。因此,较新的游戏可能无法流畅地运行。

由于14nm工艺和巧妙的省电功能,功耗相对较低(根据AMD的说法),因此显卡可用于轻薄笔记本电脑。

ManufacturerAMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega Series
RX Vega 64 4096 @ 1630 MHz2048 Bit @ 945 MHz
RX Vega 56 3584 @ 1138 - 1474 MHz409.6 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vega Mobile 1792 2048 Bit
Vega M GH 1536 @ 1063 - 1190 MHz
Vega M GL / 870 1280 @ 931 - 1011 MHz
WX Vega M GL 1280 @ 931 - 1011 MHz
Vega 11 704 @ 1240 MHz
Vega 10 640 @ 1300 MHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1300 MHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1200 MHz
Vega 6 R4000 384 @ 1500 MHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1100 MHz
Vega 3 192 @ 1000 MHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1100 MHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed1000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
Transistor Count4500 Million
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement07.01.2018
CPU in Vega 3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U2 x 2600 MHz, 15 W? MHz1200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2 x 2600 MHz, 15 W? MHz1200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2 x 2500 MHz, 15 W? MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz600 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
7.2 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -80%
...
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M -7%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics -2%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) -1%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX 4%
Intel HD Graphics 5600 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8670D 6%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 7%
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 335     avg: 389     median: 382 (2%)     max: 455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 296     avg: 345     median: 339.5 (2%)     max: 405 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 71968     avg: 82251     median: 80755 (15%)     max: 95999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 36561     avg: 44368     median: 43146 (6%)     max: 54893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5322     avg: 5908     median: 5655 (8%)     max: 7154 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7049     avg: 8445     median: 7681 (4%)     max: 10651 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 877     avg: 1044     median: 943 (3%)     max: 1279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 969     avg: 1155     median: 1065 (2%)     max: 1435 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 62065     avg: 73261     median: 72885.5 (10%)     max: 85209 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1329     avg: 2240     median: 1794 (5%)     max: 5190 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1239     avg: 1618     median: 1589.5 (3%)     max: 1936 Points
...
Intel UHD Graphics 617 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8670D -4%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 -2%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics -1%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon R5 M320 2%
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2%
AMD Radeon R5 M330 4%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 4%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 3528%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
27308 Points (14%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
15885 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
4.4 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
13.9 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
9 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
21.2 fps (4%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
26 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
25.5 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
21.5 fps (5%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
21.3 fps (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 154     avg: 180     median: 179.5 (2%)     max: 205 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 292     avg: 346     median: 346 (2%)     max: 400 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 933     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1083 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
28 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 28.2     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (7%)     max: 32 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
688 MHz (40%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
15.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
14.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
42.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
72.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
106.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.3 23.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1 12.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
37.6 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare