Notebookcheck

Intel HD Graphics 500

Intel HD Graphics 500

英特尔高清显卡500是Apollo Lake架构处理器搭配的图形处理器单元(如赛扬N3450和赛扬N3350),在2016年年中发布。这块显卡主要特性为较低的功耗,但表现较弱,远远无法满足最新游戏的要求。作为部分采用Apollo Lake架构的显卡,高清显卡500仅配有12个执行单元(EU)(高清显卡505有18个执行单元),根据型号不同运行频率在650-700MHz间。这款显卡的技术规格基于英特尔第9代架构,它也用于更高端的SKYLAKE架构系列处理器。

由于缺乏专用显存或eDRAM缓存,HD 500需经由处理器访问主内存(2个64位DDR3L- / LPDDR3-1866,LPDDR4-2400)。

性能

高清显卡500应该比较老的Broadwell架构的高清显卡(Broadwell)稍慢,所以最新游戏(2016年)即使是最低设置下也将几乎无法在流畅运行。

特性

改进后的视频引擎现在可以更加高效地硬件解码H.265 / HEVC。最多三个显示器可以通过 DP/eDP或HDMI(通过HDMI 1.4 4K可能只能达到30赫兹)连接。

功耗

整个赛扬N3450芯片的热设计功率默认是6瓦,因此该显卡主要用于(通常采用被动冷却)上网本或轻薄笔记本。它的TDP也可以减少到4瓦,但是这显然会影响性能。

ManufacturerIntel
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameApollo Lake
ArchitectureIntel Gen. 9 (Apollo Lake)
Pipelines12 - unified
Core Speed300 - 700 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory Type(LP)DDR3(L) / LPDDR4
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2016
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 200 MHz650 - 700 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 19294     avg: 24491     median: 24609 (5%)     max: 29579 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 12299     avg: 15194.7     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 1932     avg: 2139.6     median: 2116 (4%)     max: 2306 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 2578     avg: 3029.8     median: 3007 (2%)     max: 3693 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 271     avg: 321.7     median: 307 (1%)     max: 401 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 293     avg: 362     median: 362 (1%)     max: 444 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 20140     avg: 26073.7     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 414     avg: 532.6     median: 530 (2%)     max: 655 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 368     avg: 478.6     median: 482 (1%)     max: 584 points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
20 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
20 fps (5%)
GFXBench - High Tier Onscreen
6.3 fps (4%)
GFXBench - High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
3.6 fps (3%)
GFXBench - Normal Tier Onscreen
10 fps (5%)
GFXBench - Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
9.7 fps (4%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
8.4 fps (2%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
8.8 fps (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
49 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
79 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (1%)     max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
8.9 Watt (2%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
450 MHz (27%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
28.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
34.4 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.6 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.9 22.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare