Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)

用于笔记本电脑的Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000是专业的高端图形卡,适用于功能强大的笔记本电脑和移动工作站。它基于与消费类GeForce RTX 2080(移动设备)相同的TU104芯片,但提供了更多的着色器(增加了128个)。与台式机RTX 5000相比,移动版提供了更低的频率。除了更低的频率Max-Q版本以外,还有110 W(1035-1545 MHz)和150 W(1350-1770 MHz)的不同版本。

型号                    TGP(W)   基频(MHz) 睿频(MHz)

Quadro RTX 5000台式机  230         1620         1815

Quadro RTX 5000移动版  150         1350         1770

Quadro RTX 5000移动版  110         1035         1545

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q  90          930          1455

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q  85          765          1395

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q  80          600          1350

Quadro GPU提供经过认证的驱动程序,这些驱动程序针对专业应用程序(CAD,DCC,医疗,勘探和可视化应用程序)的稳定性和性能进行了优化。因此,与相应的消费类GPU相比,这些领域的性能要好得多。

特征

NVIDIA以12 nm FinFET工艺制造TU104芯片,并包含深度学习超级采样(DLSS)和实时光线追踪(RTRT)等功能,与基于公司Pascal架构的旧GPU相比,它们应结合起来可产生更逼真的光照效果(如果游戏支持)。 Quadro RTX 5000还支持DisplayPort 1.4,同时还支持HDMI 2.0b,HDR,同时多投影(SMP)和H.265视频编码/解码(PlayReady 3.0)。

性能

根据应用程序或游戏的不同,Quadro RTX 5000甚至比GeForce RTX 2080还要强,因此是最强的移动图形卡。特别是对于某些使用大型VRAM的专业应用程序和工作流程,Quadro可以明显胜过RTX2080。

RTX5000的高功耗使其最适合大型和重型笔记本电脑。较慢的Max-Q版本适用于较薄的笔记本电脑。

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19E-Q5
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines3072 - unified
Core Speed1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption110 / 150 Watt
Transistor Count13.6 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesNVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10.5 pt (32%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -99%
...
8.49 -19%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
9.02 -14%
9.29 -12%
9.39 -11%
9.43 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
9.51 -9%
9.7 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
9.75 -7%
10.2 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
10.5
10.7 2%
11 5%
11.6 10%
11.6 10%
11.6 10%
11.6 10%
11.8 12%
12 14%
12.1 15%
...
21.1 101%
max:
33.3 217%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8246     avg: 9013     median: 9012.5 (26%)     max: 9779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 8708     avg: 9332     median: 9332 (25%)     max: 9956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
501167 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
397321 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 34501     avg: 39399     median: 39398.5 (42%)     max: 44296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 100792     avg: 117274     median: 117274 (31%)     max: 133756 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 17512     avg: 18943     median: 18943 (33%)     max: 20374 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 21715     avg: 23035     median: 23034.5 (26%)     max: 24354 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
390293 Points (47%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19301     avg: 21964     median: 21068.5 (29%)     max: 26416 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18233     avg: 25897     median: 24620 (21%)     max: 32999 Points
171.8 -99%
...
22405 -13%
22548 -13%
23358 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
23574 -9%
24213 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
25100 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
25371 -2%
25737 -1%
25775 0%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
25897
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
26602 3%
26816 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27104 5%
27852 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28106 9%
28692 11%
28974 12%
29411 14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29416 14%
...
59943 131%
max:
106023 309%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
45180 Points (60%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
125.5 fps (41%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
302.1 fps (100%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
225.3 fps (100%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
532 fps (100%)
0.6 -100%
...
150 -72%
151.3 -72%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
154.3 -71%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
155.3 -71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
163.2 -69%
164.2 -69%
199.4 -63%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
224.2 -58%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
236.1 -56%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
532
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 120     avg: 156.7     median: 120 (30%)     max: 230.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 145     avg: 184     median: 149 (22%)     max: 258.1 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 93     avg: 104.3     median: 93.4 (20%)     max: 126.4 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
109.3 fps (28%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 90.2     avg: 121.4     median: 95.1 (26%)     max: 179 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
26 fps (23%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 127     avg: 144.4     median: 134 (54%)     max: 172.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 125     avg: 159     median: 132 (22%)     max: 220 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 172     avg: 193.9     median: 174 (30%)     max: 235.8 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 118.6     avg: 144.1     median: 127 (34%)     max: 203.8 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 226.4     avg: 307.2     median: 268.5 (30%)     max: 465.3 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 92.4     avg: 104.7     median: 99.7 (22%)     max: 127.1 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 98.8     avg: 116.1     median: 116.1 (24%)     max: 133.4 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 182.8     avg: 234.9     median: 208 (24%)     max: 340.8 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 46.13     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (17%)     max: 57.3 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 185.4     avg: 231.3     median: 210 (31%)     max: 319.8 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 183.8     avg: 238.9     median: 216.5 (24%)     max: 338.9 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 168.7     avg: 187.5     median: 174.5 (30%)     max: 232.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
19419 points (14%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 196     avg: 215.6     median: 209.5 (12%)     max: 247.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
242.3 fps (44%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
584 fps (43%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
435.7 fps (49%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
602 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
626 fps (37%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1960 fps (16%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
413 fps (94%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
3408 Samples/s (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
7688 Samples/s (13%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
19614 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 181     avg: 201     median: 201 (44%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4973     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (49%)     max: 0.4994 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 39     avg: 41.8     median: 41.8 (67%)     max: 44.6 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
234.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
200.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
183.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
180.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
128.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
231.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
77.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
106.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
145.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
112.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
232.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
96.8
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
34.6
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
186.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
152  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
153.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
149.7
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
239  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
55.9
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
243  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
210  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
146  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
78  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
173 271.6 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132 154.6 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98 113.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.1 83.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
303.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
85.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
119.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
289.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
208.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
200.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
161  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
63.4
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
143.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
135  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
76.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
187  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
151.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
84.3
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102 147 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.6 130 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.9 126 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.1 118 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
148
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
102  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
143
low 1280x720
110  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
329.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
216.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
206.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Extreme Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
57.2
low 1024x768
350.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
296.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
279.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
266.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
138  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
113.8
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
235 375.3 ~ 305 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
217 308.5 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163 198.6 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.4 109.9 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
49
low 1280x720
458  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
396.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
367.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
216.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
757  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
681  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
625  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
319.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom Eternal234.5200.2183.7180.8128.568.6
Hunt Showdown231.1163.8130.487.877.1
Escape from Tarkov121121120.3110.6106.653.8
Red Dead Redemption 2145.6125.987.454.143.728.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order112.8112.1107.589.650.2
Need for Speed Heat109.9104.998.795.98952.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019232.6156.2144.9119.386.648.8
GRID 2019186.6144.5142.5100.780.754.9
Ghost Recon Breakpoint152125118886638
Borderlands 3153.8130.2104.585.559.831.5
Control239123.793.360.530.1
F1 201924321018214414678
Total War: Three Kingdoms2221431067753.325.9
Rage 2303.8160.4137.1133.885.842.2
Anno 1800119.2118.893.151.146.930.3
The Division 2178156131555538
Dirt Rally 2.0289.3208.4200.1115.584.351.2
Metro Exodus161124.495.27759.336.7
Apex Legends144144144143.913576.3
Battlefield V187164.6161.7151.9123.972.7
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey11310494736340
Shadow of the Tomb Raider125104101968747
Far Cry 515012812311510256
X-Plane 11.1111084.576.5
For Honor329.3216.9206.8160.468.4
Rainbow Six Siege350.2296.1279.6266.2138
Dota 2 Reborn14413297.592
The Witcher 330526318110071
BioShock Infinite458396.9367.9216.3
Tomb Raider757681625319.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
25


6
24


13
17

3
15
9

6
13
4
2
16
7
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 05:08:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.035s ... 0.035s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#18 composed specs +0s ... 0.037s

#19 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#20 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 9852 +0.028s ... 0.065s

#22 got single benchmarks 9852 +0.02s ... 0.084s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0.762s ... 0.846s

#25 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.846s

#26 Got 177 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.858s

#27 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.858s

#28 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.025s ... 0.883s

#29 benchmarks composed for output. +1.425s ... 2.308s

#30 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.311s

#31 return log +0s ... 2.311s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) graphics card

Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel Pro CC715-91P-X92: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel Pro CC715-91P-X92

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8103R: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8103R

Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-73YL: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-73YL

Dell Precision 7540 Xeon E2286M, RTX 5000: unknown, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 7540 Xeon E2286M, RTX 5000

HP ZBook 17 G6, Xeon E-2286, RTX 5000: unknown, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook 17 G6, Xeon E-2286, RTX 5000

Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-75G8: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-75G8

MSI WS65 9TM-857: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI WS65 9TM-857

Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X-W730G5T, i7-9750H: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X-W730G5T, i7-9750H

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01-23)