Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop是一款用于笔记本电脑的 Blackwell 系列移动显卡,曾在 2025 年的 CES 上亮相,并于 2025 年 4 月投入商用。

架构

GeForce RTX 5090 移动版使用了 GB203 芯片,并采用了 10,496 个着色器/CUDA 核心,这是该芯片支持的最大值 10,752 个着色器/CUDA 核心。这使得 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑与 RTX 5080 台式机变体(相同芯片)比 桌面版 RTX 5090的 20760 个内核和更高的时钟频率更为相似。

作为一项新功能,得益于第五代张量内核,Blackwell 通过 DLSS4 支持多帧生成(MFG)。

性能

我们的测试表明,与 175W RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU 的性能提升在 3DMark 测试中几乎不明显。不过,就整体游戏性能而言,该显卡比上一代移动旗舰产品快 2-19%。我们测试的最快笔记本电脑版本仅比 RTX 5080 台式机落后 5%。这意味着 5090L 通常能够流畅地显示 4k 的完整细节(见下文)。此外,有了前面提到的多帧生成(MFG),你可以获得令人印象深刻的帧率,但要注意延迟。

功耗

GB203 芯片采用台积电 4N(定制 4NP 5nm)工艺制造。显卡的最大 TGP 可达到 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X11
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines10496 - unified
TMUs328
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores82
Tensor / AI Cores328
Core Speed990 - 1515 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance31.8 TFLOPS FP16, 31.8 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU1824 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 10.3 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory24 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (95 - 150 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.7 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 5579     avg: 6281     median: 6326 (43%)     max: 6643 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 4791     avg: 5948     median: 6038 (42%)     max: 6500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 18624     avg: 24471     median: 25981 (59%)     max: 27244 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 150942     avg: 152016     median: 152016 (77%)     max: 153090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 34972     avg: 44673     median: 46751 (54%)     max: 49864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 95886     avg: 108239     median: 113929 (47%)     max: 114903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 31954     avg: 39771     median: 39227 (59%)     max: 49845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 42175     avg: 51817     median: 51545 (47%)     max: 62849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 532587     avg: 605227     median: 606569 (67%)     max: 675184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 16828     avg: 21912     median: 22241 (58%)     max: 24432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 19216     avg: 23833     median: 24483 (50%)     max: 26212 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -100%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
14875 -38%
15184 -36%
16308 -32%
16556 -31%
17764 -25%
19434 -18%
20920 -12%
20950 -12%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23833
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 -2%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 85%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 836363     avg: 865822     median: 862499 (87%)     max: 898604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 582157     avg: 595756     median: 595187 (70%)     max: 609924 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 64882     avg: 73706     median: 73245.5 (69%)     max: 80657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 133460     avg: 150724     median: 146738 (36%)     max: 181665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 73589     avg: 83795     median: 85147 (80%)     max: 92650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 113372     avg: 168808     median: 189862 (73%)     max: 203190 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 25151     avg: 47948     median: 49088 (59%)     max: 54833 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 26378     avg: 66542     median: 69860 (53%)     max: 80022 Points
171.8 -100%
...
46877 -30%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
49410 -26%
51979 -22%
54921 -17%
55525 -17%
56791 -15%
59943 -10%
60040 -10%
65041 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
66542
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 3%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 95%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 111238     avg: 129673     median: 132638 (38%)     max: 145142 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 131334     avg: 138989     median: 136591 (75%)     max: 149043 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
96677 -30%
97889 -30%
102426 -26%
102619 -26%
103283 -26%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
117151 -16%
128541 -8%
129977 -6%
132443 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
138989
140541 1%
...
132443 -5%
max:
173912 25%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 64778     avg: 66605     median: 65718 (86%)     max: 69318 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 231     avg: 253     median: 259.8 (79%)     max: 268.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 15     avg: 17.6     median: 16.5 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 9     avg: 11.8     median: 11 (4%)     max: 18 Seconds
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
542 fps (100%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 35.9     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (4%)     max: 42.5 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 60.6     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (18%)     max: 66.4 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 639.7     avg: 737     median: 737.4 (79%)     max: 835.04 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 77.7     avg: 82     median: 82 (13%)     max: 86.2 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 122.2     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (44%)     max: 132 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 108.4     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (56%)     max: 120 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 207.3     avg: 231.2     median: 231.2 (61%)     max: 255 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 33.3     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (3%)     max: 34.4 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 27.4     avg: 28.8     median: 28.8 (18%)     max: 30.1 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 380     avg: 401     median: 401 (58%)     max: 422 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 56.4     avg: 66.1     median: 66.1 (14%)     max: 75.8 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 105     avg: 114     median: 114 (51%)     max: 123 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 65.2     avg: 67.9     median: 67.9 (44%)     max: 70.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 160     avg: 163.5     median: 163.5 (55%)     max: 167 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 13696     avg: 20503     median: 22892 (16%)     max: 24922 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 220.23     avg: 230.5     median: 232.5 (24%)     max: 238.7 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 121.3     avg: 283.4     median: 290.5 (17%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 99.5     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 242.8     avg: 254.8     median: 254.8 (96%)     max: 266.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 466     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (92%)     max: 557 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1067     avg: 1094     median: 1094.5 (81%)     max: 1121.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 975     avg: 1017     median: 1016.6 (96%)     max: 1058.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
1112 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1154 fps (48%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
4193 fps (33%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 801     median: 315 (8%)     max: 2756 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 5.8     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 16.7 fps
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 181670     avg: 221856     median: 226981 (58%)     max: 253130 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 22108     avg: 157742     median: 187250 (47%)     max: 244348 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 9883     avg: 13340     median: 10773.5 (39%)     max: 21929 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 10315     avg: 19839     median: 22223 (39%)     max: 24593 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 48753     avg: 55273     median: 57056 (47%)     max: 58228 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 218.5     median: 223 (30%)     max: 250 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 200     avg: 240.5     median: 240.5 (34%)     max: 281 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.778     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (72%)     max: 0.96 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 164.5     avg: 275.4     median: 287 (80%)     max: 348 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 160.4     avg: 271.7     median: 285.5 (36%)     max: 343 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4423     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.686 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
55.2 dB(A) (79%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

2026
low 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
78  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
93  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
124.4 135 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
114 128 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
100.6 111.8 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96.1 108.2 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.1 78.6 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
41.9 45.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
69.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
90.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
162 213 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
131 132 173 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108 113 142 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74 75 94 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
61 63 66 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 36 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
50 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
73 88 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TAA 1920x1080
148
140
War Thunder

War Thunder

2026
med. 1920x1080
405  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
361  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
244 257 ~ 251 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
188.8 199.9 ~ 194 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159 164.9 ~ 162 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
120.1 125 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
68.8 71.4 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
97.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
148.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced + Path Tracing 1920x1080
115.2
low 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
115.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
109.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
99.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
130.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
94.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
79.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
50.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
92.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
171.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
153.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
69.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
84.7
low 1920x1080
216  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
208 213 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168 170 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69 71 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47 47 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
70  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
160.6 191.3 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.2 149.4 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105.3 121.6 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.9 69.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.9 49.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.3 28.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
182.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
167  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
116.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
87.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
51.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
78  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
103.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
181.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
169.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
145.8 159.4 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
108.5 109.3 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.4 59.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
82.5 83.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
136.7 143.4 ~ 140 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
98.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
68.7 76.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.5 54 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32.8 37.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.6 20.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
107.1 117.5 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
188.1 221 240 279 286 317 322 ~ 265 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.8 205 207 226 240 256 266 268 279 308 ~ 243 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168.3 190.9 200 217 227 241 252 255 280 291 ~ 232 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1 49.4 49.7 57 58.6 58.8 59.8 62.2 62.3 65.3 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.2 30.7 30.9 34 35.8 36.1 36.8 37.5 37.7 39.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.2 14.1 16 16.7 17.5 17.8 18.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
25.4 26.7 32.2 34 34.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51.8 53 53.2 61 64 66.9 67.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
111.6
114
116.9
117.9
91.4
91.4
87.7
123.2
120.6
low 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.3 124.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.4 113.9 133.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 111.3 128.9 ~ 115 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77 82.1 92.2 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.3 52.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
102.3 107.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
118.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104.2 111.8 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.5 61.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.7 45.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
94 106 107 112 113 115 115 126 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88 101 101 102 104 109 111 111 115 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72 86 88 88 89 90 95 96 97 97 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44 57 58 62 63 64 65 67 68 69 69 70 70 72 74 75 75 75 76 76 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37 49 49 50 51 54 55 55 56 56 57 58 59 59 59 59 61 63 64 64 65 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 35 36 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 42 43 44 46 46 46 46 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
47 53 53 53 53 55 55 56 59 61 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45 62 64 65 65 66 67 69 70 76 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
106
97
105
108
97
90
94
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
66
78
74
81
84
76
72
75
med. 1920x1080
206 231 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
203 225 ~ 214 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
158.8 171.3 184.9 ~ 172 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
91.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
127.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
185.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
100.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.4 68.1 80.8 83.5 87.6 88.2 88.3 88.9 89 94.6 95.3 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 65.6 70.3 70.4 72 73.3 73.8 74.7 75 76.4 80.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 44.1 44.4 46 46.3 46.8 46.9 47.5 47.7 48.5 50.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.6 60.3 61.2 64 64.5 69.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
63.9 68.6 79 81.9 85 86.4 92.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
252  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
184.3 195.8 206 ~ 195 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151.7 165.7 177.7 ~ 165 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108 118.5 126.8 130.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.6 86 94.4 97.2 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
54.7 56.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
70.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.7 114.5 115.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
186.4 187.5 192.6 203 217 ~ 197 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
183.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
138.2 142.6 146.1 151.9 164.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.7 119.6 121.9 126.1 127.9 128.6 130.6 132 133.4 133.9 135.2 140.3 142.3 152.5 152.6 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
66.1 97.3 99.1 101.3 101.6 102 102.2 102.6 105 105.9 106 107.1 112.6 112.9 115.9 121.9 122.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
48.2 62.3 63.5 65 65.5 65.6 66.4 66.6 66.6 68.6 70.8 72.3 73 75 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
76.2 113.9 118 119.9 120.6 122.4 133.7 141.4 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
72.9
180
80.2
82
84.2
91.5
83.1
81.5
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
109
51.9
51
51.8
56.2
51.7
52.2
Marvel Rivals

Marvel Rivals

2024
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
100 106.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.1 92.6 167.8 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.3 81.8 147.6 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.8 65.4 110.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
92.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
124.9 134.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
201 205 215 229 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
186 194 200 209 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 157 165 169 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
128 147 147 151 161 162 162 174 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92 116 117 123 127 131 136 151 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60 71 79 82 90 101 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
131  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
109.9 110.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96.9 102.4 116.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.5 93.9 104 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.6 69.5 76.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.7 86.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
172.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
134.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
77.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
118.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
101.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
64.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
102.8 104.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102.1 103.1 108.5 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 101.4 108 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
97.2 98.6 107.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
69.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
94.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
97.5 100.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.3 91.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7 82.9 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
62.8 70 71.6 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
43.7 50 54 61 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160 cinem.
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160 cinem.
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
66.5 70.8 70.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
87.9
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 3840x2160 cinem.
53.4
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG 4x, RR 3840x2160 cinem.
97.2
low 1920x1080
158 182 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118 122 135 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 97 97 107 109 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55 57 57 58 63 63 65 65 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42 43 44 45 47 48 48 49 50 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26 26 27 27 28 29 29 30 33 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
43 45 46 46 49 52 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62 64 64 65 67 69 70 73 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
201
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
45
44
47
45
43
45
46
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
76
82
82
85
79
77
81
83
cinematic RT: Very High 3840x2160
13
13
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
236 240 254 301 310 343 353 361 363 421 ~ 318 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
236 247 260 265 299 335 335 338 342 369 379 391 399 ~ 323 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
207 236 240 252 258 261 275 281 305 321 324 326 341 357 357 364 372 ~ 299 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5 107.7 122.1 123.3 129 132.3 133 139 142.7 144.2 144.9 148 152 152.2 153.8 154.2 154.9 155.4 155.8 156.3 157.8 158.3 163.6 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.5 75.4 81.3 84.6 90 94.7 94.9 95 97 97.8 99.8 100 101 101.2 103.3 103.6 104 104.3 105 105.5 106.4 106.9 108.2 109.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.3 39.5 44.4 48.4 48.8 49 50 50.5 50.5 51.3 52 52 52.2 52.3 53.6 54.2 54.3 54.7 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
66 66.8 75.3 80.5 80.8 81 82 85.3 87.9 89.2 90.2 90.6 90.9 92.7 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
77.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.5 108.1 122.6 124.7 126 130.7 132.8 139.1 141 141.8 144.8 151 153.7 154.1 155.9 156.3 159.3 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
156.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
257
med. 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.6 86.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56.2 63.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
61.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.1 115.1 ~ 115 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
104.2 108.1 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
84.9 100.3 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
94.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
121.6 140.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.3 140.3 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
95 100.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
157.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
153.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
128 140.1 ~ 134 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
81.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
4K 3840x2160
78.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
121.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
71.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
low 1920x1080
123.4 130.1 130.5 135.7 145.3 145.4 ~ 135 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
119.6 128.1 129.6 137.7 138.6 143.5 ~ 133 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83 95 95.2 116.1 116.4 120.6 123.5 124.7 125.2 127.2 127.7 129.7 129.8 132.7 133.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.6 76.7 81.1 81.1 82.4 82.9 83.4 84.5 88.1 88.3 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.5 88.8 91.4 93.1 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.4 41.6 43 43.1 45.9 46 46 46.2 46.8 47.1 47.7 49.3 49.6 49.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
68.3 69.7 75.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
70.9
72
67
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
21.8
22.5
20.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
19.7
20
20.8
19.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
38.7
38.2
39.4
41.9
36.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
66.7
65.8
71.1
72.3
65.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
116.3
120.6
125.7
126.6
114.2
med. 1920x1080
390  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
327  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
224  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
116.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.8 132.4 154.7 161.6 164.2 164.7 165.6 173.7 178.7 185.5 186 189.3 191.2 194.9 199.4 208 209 226 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.4 127.9 146.4 154.5 158.2 159.5 163.5 171.6 177.3 181.6 185 185.8 187.7 187.9 188.1 191 194.8 196.6 202 208 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.8 120.3 124.5 142.2 147 149.4 155.1 161.5 166.4 166.8 167.6 168.9 170.2 171.9 173.3 174.5 175.6 177.1 177.3 179.1 180 185 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.4 105.3 112.3 112.3 126.2 137.5 139.5 144 151.9 152.5 152.7 153.6 154.8 154.9 155.8 157 157.5 158.5 161.7 162.2 162.5 163.4 164 166.5 167.3 169.4 169.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.2 84.9 90.8 91.6 98.6 104.8 105.8 106.8 107.7 108.3 109.7 109.7 110.6 110.8 111.1 111.2 111.2 111.3 111.4 111.5 114.1 115.6 116.6 117.2 118.7 118.9 120.5 121.8 122.8 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.6 43.2 49.9 50.4 50.7 50.9 52.1 52.3 52.7 52.8 52.9 52.9 53.1 53.1 53.5 54.2 54.7 55 55.1 56.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
60.9 61 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
46.2 46.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
94.1 100.7 102.7 104.6 116.6 118.4 119 122.6 122.7 125.3 125.5 126.2 127.3 128.1 128.7 132.4 135.2 136.6 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
173.2
177.8
187.1
161.9
202
205
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
80.6
81.7
84.9
77.3
72.5
79.4
83.3
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset + DLSS3 Quality + FG 3840x2160
72.2
80.6
76.9
80.2
79.5
73.8
82.6
73.3
77.3
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
153.8
156.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
23.4
25.7
25
25
25.8
26.1
26
23.4
23.1
24.5
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
107.9
143.5
144.2
110
135
151.4
144.4
172.1
137.1
148.8
154
146
152.4
152.6
154.3
157
148.6
106.5
165.1
142.6
119
130.2
156
163.1
158.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
13.9
13.6
13
13
13.8
13.6
11.1
13.9
12.9
13.3
13.4
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
26.1
28.9
28.1
28.9
28.2
29.7
29.5
22.6
30
27.3
28
28.1
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
46.2
50.4
50.4
52
50
47.4
50.8
41
53.2
49.3
49.1
51
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.7
90.1
90
96.3
93.5
86.3
93.7
73.9
97.8
86.9
89.9
94.1
low 1920x1080
180 183.2 205 225.3 229 250 250 260.8 267 274 287 291 333.4 ~ 249 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
175 177.5 183.1 199 205.2 217 218.2 221 224 229.6 240 242 244 254 260.7 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
163.5 168.7 188.6 195.5 196.7 197 198.5 202 203.7 207 209 211 212 213.5 223 227.4 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
118.8 143.1 158.7 162 167 186.3 193.3 193.7 194 195 196.2 199.2 200 201 202 202 207 207 209 211 213 218.8 219 220.4 225.3 236.5 ~ 195 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.1 114.2 121 122.7 138.8 139.6 141.7 145.6 146 147.7 149.5 149.6 150.5 151 151 152.8 153.8 155.3 156.4 156.9 157.3 158.2 158.3 158.4 161.5 165.7 174.8 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.2 68.1 79.1 81.7 81.9 82.8 83.1 84.1 84.3 84.5 84.6 85.3 85.3 87.4 87.8 88.5 89.2 89.8 94 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
124.2 124.9 125.4 125.9 127.8 129 129 133.1 134.9 135.5 149.3 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
192 199.8 201 202 237.3 ~ 206 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
269
293
206
330
92.7
229
Starfield

Starfield

2023
ultra 1920x1080
88.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
48.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
108.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
4K 3840x2160
90.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
380 404 480 482 504 511 520 553 563 601 617 632 639 643 652 654 ~ 552 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
321 341 368 374 381 398 410 426 431 475 478 479 482 500 503 509 526 ~ 435 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
321 322 334 353 357 381 397 413 415 418 425 450 457 471 473 479 485 494 499 ~ 418 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
303 308 319 326 339 368 375 378 382 401 402 408 418 433 434 437 443 453 453.1 456 458 464 ~ 398 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
240 266 283 287 290 303 308 310 315 319 329 329 330 333 333 336 339 342.9 343 345 350 354 ~ 317 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
151.4 153.9 155.8 164.2 168 174.6 174.9 175.9 177.5 179.3 179.6 179.6 182.2 182.2 184.5 185.5 187.2 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
106.8 108.9 109.4 118.8 121.8 122.9 140.4 148.8 149.2 149.3 151.8 153.2 153.7 154.8 158 160 161.3 161.6 163.4 172.3 174.2 181.1 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.7 103.6 111.8 111.9 120 128.6 133 136 136.1 138 139.2 141.5 143 143.3 143.6 143.9 148.3 150.3 152.6 155.6 158.1 159.9 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9 85.2 91.4 92 98.5 99.7 110 112.6 112.6 113.2 114.2 115.9 116.8 117.6 118.7 119.5 120.9 121.4 121.7 121.8 122.1 122.2 122.9 129.8 133.6 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67 71.3 77.2 84.6 89.9 93.5 93.6 93.8 94.8 95.6 97.1 97.6 98.4 100 100.2 102.4 104.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
174.7 196.1 217 218 222 226 232 233 233 233 234 234 234 234 234 234 235 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.8 173.6 184.5 205 217 218 226 226 230 230 231 231 232 232 233 233 233 234 236 236 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144.4 147.4 154.4 164.2 175.5 181.9 192.6 194.6 198.1 199.3 201 201 203 203 205 205 208 209 210 212 212 214 215 215 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.4 129.9 134.1 139.5 154.1 157 160.5 160.7 161.8 162.4 166.4 169.7 170 170.7 171.3 172.2 173.5 174 176.5 176.7 177.2 179.5 180.3 181 183.6 184.3 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
83.4 95.5 96.3 96.8 99 101.3 101.7 102.9 103.9 104.2 104.7 106.4 107 107.4 109.1 109.2 109.4 111.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
169.2 170.5 173.9 174.7 189.5 200 215 216 217 223 223 223 225 225 229 231 234 234 238.8 240 251 313 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
150.7 152.7 154.4 156.7 169.1 175 184.1 186.6 189.4 193.5 193.8 195.2 196.6 204 206 206 207 207 210 214 217.9 288 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143.3 143.3 151.3 153.3 162.3 168.9 177.5 178.9 179.2 184.4 187.5 188.3 189.6 190.2 193 197.3 197.6 198.3 200 201 207.9 208 275 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.4 137.1 141.7 141.9 153.8 154.7 161 166.4 167.2 170.3 171 171.5 172 175.5 176.1 176.4 184.2 184.7 184.8 185.6 186.1 186.6 194.7 248 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
131.2 133 147.6 151.6 152.6 160 165.2 165.3 168.6 168.8 174 175.9 176.8 178.5 179.9 180.1 193.1 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
447  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
428  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
404  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
192 218.5 224 234 240 ~ 222 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
151 185 193.5 199.1 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
114 129 169.8 170.9 ~ 146 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
112.4
114.8
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
422
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
162.5 182 185.2 187.7 191.4 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
170.5 178 184.5 186.7 187.1 187.5 190.9 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156.2 180.4 180.5 182.5 184.3 185.3 186.8 187.5 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.9 120.5 121.6 136.6 137.4 140.9 142.4 145.6 161.9 162.4 162.8 162.8 164.1 165.2 166.1 166.2 173 183.9 186.9 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62.7 96.9 119.8 121.4 129.7 133.4 137.7 146.8 156.8 158 160.1 160.8 162.3 163.1 164.3 164.5 165.6 173.7 183.9 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
150.7 163.8 173.2 176.1 178.6 179.5 179.9 181.5 182.7 186.6 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
84.4
110.3
110.6
114.7
116.7
104.2
105.4
90.1
107.5
114.4
123.2
116.6
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
183
184.8
176.9
191.2
187.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179.4
186.5
171.4
192.2
187.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced145123114765935
007 First Light1301211061027644
Forza Horizon 6188145121816336
War Thunder40536113792.448.2
Pragmata25119416212370
Death Stranding 2124115.3109.192.973.547.3
Crimson Desert130.4109106.194.279.450.9
Resident Evil Requiem171.4153.7148.6103.469.235
Call of Duty Black Ops 7216211169704729
Anno 117: Pax Romana176139113634526
ARC Raiders182.5167116.187.551.1
The Outer Worlds 2103.693.275.552.928.3
Battlefield 6181.4169.4159.915310960
Borderlands 498.48273513519
F1 25265243232573516
Doom: The Dark Ages133.51211191158448
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered118.4108604427.3
Assassin's Creed Shadows11110590675641
Civilization 721921417291.8
Monster Hunter Wilds100.194.8857146
Kingdom Come Deliverance 22521951651219055
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle197183.214913110566
Marvel Rivals836036
Stalker 21031161027965.4
Call of Duty Black Ops 621319715715412481
Until Dawn110105957145.4
God of War Ragnarök172.7134.977.8
Final Fantasy XVI101.174.441.8
Space Marine 210310510310169.6
Star Wars Outlaws8578685224.6
Black Myth: Wukong170125101624628
F1 243183232991439850
Senua's Saga Hellblade 296.8816037.5
Ghost of Tsushima119.61151069362
Horizon Forbidden West160.31311309859.5
Dragon's Dogma 299.393.4
Helldivers 2157.7157.3153.813481.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357357
The Finals78.5
EA Sports WRC71.5
Alan Wake 21351331198445
Counter-Strike 2390327275224116.4
Cyberpunk 207717817416114810952
Baldur's Gate 324921920119514783
Starfield88.573.548.8
Hogwarts Legacy108.396.859.5
The Witcher 3 v490.2
Strange Brigade552435418398317174
X-Plane 11.1114613611392
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark225220194165103
Dota 2 Reborn219194186172165
The Witcher 3447428404222182146
GTA V182184180153145175
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
26


13
31


20
24

2
24
17

10
26
12
8
22
17
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $4,466.99
    Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 w/Ultra 9, RTX 5090, 64GB RAM, 2TB,16” OLED
  • $4,087.77
    ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 18” ROG Nebula HDR 16:10 2.5K 240Hz/3ms, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 32GB DDR5, 2TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Pro, G835LX-XS97
  • $4,079.25
    msi Raider 18 HX AI 18” 120Hz UHD+ Gaming Laptop: Intel Core U9-285HX, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5090, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD, Thunderbolt 5, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Pro: Black A2XWJG-069US
  • $4,999.00
    ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026) Gaming Laptop, 18” ROG Nebula HDR 4K 240Hz/3ms, Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, 32GB DDR5, 1TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win11 Home, G835LXG-DB96
  • $3,999.00
    msi Stealth 18 HX AI 18” 120Hz UHD+ Mini LED Gaming Laptop: Intel Ultra 9-275HX, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5090, 64GB DDR5, 2TB NVMe SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Pro: Black A2XWJG-035US

v1.35
log 27. 14:16:41

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:48:24 +0200 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.015s ... 0.019s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.02s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12928 +0.033s ... 0.053s

#13 got single benchmarks 12928 +0.065s ... 0.117s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +3.062s ... 3.18s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 3.18s

#17 Got 1997 rows for game benchmarks. +1.125s ... 4.305s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 4.305s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 4.343s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.879s ... 5.221s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.395s ... 5.616s

#22 return log +0s ... 5.616s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop graphics card

搭载4K Mini-LED、RTX 5090和128 GB内存的游戏怪兽——华硕ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG评测

搭载4K Mini-LED、RTX 5090和128 GB内存的游戏怪兽——华硕ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG评测

华硕正在对其 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 进行升级,搭载英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX 处理器、 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本显卡,以及一款具备 240 Hz 刷新率和 2,000 个调光分区的 18 英寸 4K Mini-LED 显示屏。此外,得益于简化的组件访问方式,以及 AniME Vision 提供的丰富定制选项和多功能 RGB 灯效,该机型还具备出色的可维护性。
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18", 3.6 kg
依然是最快、最静音的游戏本之一——Razer Blade 18 2026 评测

依然是最快、最静音的游戏本之一——Razer Blade 18 2026 评测

Razer Blade 18 是最快的游戏本之一,其 2026 款现搭载英特尔最新的 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 处理器,搭配大家熟悉的 GeForce RTX 5090 显卡以及支持 240 或 440 Hz 刷新率的双模式 4K IPS 屏幕。 不过,其价格现在比以前高出许多。
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18", 3.2 kg
微星 Raider 16 Max HX 笔记本电脑评测:比泰坦 18 HX 更快

微星 Raider 16 Max HX 笔记本电脑评测:比泰坦 18 HX 更快

即使与大多数较大的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑相比,新款 Raider 16 Max HX 也能提供超乎寻常的动力,但要做好系统有些厚重的准备。
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.7 kg
Razer Blade 16 评测:英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

Razer Blade 16 评测:英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

以前 AMD 独占的 Razer Blade 16 现在可以配置英特尔 CPU,而且差异非常明显--通常是更好。不过,你得准备为所有升级支付更多费用。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
配备 RTX 5090 的双屏游戏敞篷车 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 评测

配备 RTX 5090 的双屏游戏敞篷车 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 评测

华硕新推出的 ROG Zephyrus Duo 将双屏可折叠概念提升到了一个新的高度,这是一款搭载英特尔 Panther Lake CPU 和GeForce RTX 5090 的双屏游戏笔记本电脑。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.8 kg

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  Review » 微星 Stealth 18 HX AI 笔记本电脑评测:迄今最便携的 18 英寸游戏本

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt P16 5090 评测--串联 OLED 和 RTX 5090 对决Apple MacBook Pro 16

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的联想Legion 9 18 评测:市场上最强大的游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00"
  Review » 笔记本电脑电源提升:技嘉 Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box - 通过雷电 5 外接 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 GPU 评测

Schenker Key 18 Pro M25 RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.1 kg
  Review » 申克 Key 18 Pro E25 评测:配备 RTX 5090 和 256 GB 内存的高端工作站

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » 速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  Review » Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测:性能至上

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » 微星 Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG 评测:酷睿至尊 9 285HX 和 175 瓦 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑性能无懈可击

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 最高游戏性能的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 和 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 - XMG Neo 16 A25 评测

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测:配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  Review » AMD 凭借 Fire Range HX3D 成为游戏领域的佼佼者--Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 与 Intel Core Ultra 275HX 对比评测

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 得益于 300 Hz mini LED,最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑中的迷你 LED - 华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 评测

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测:速度超快,但温度有点高

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测:RTX 5090 带来的代价

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析:最快游戏 CPU 之争

Schenker Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析:最快游戏 CPU 之争

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

Schenker Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 预览版--配备 AMD、RTX 5000 和 300 Hz Mini-LED 的最快游戏笔记本电脑

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快,但还有更多惊喜等着你

Razer Blade 18 2026: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2026 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 11 - 评测与配置

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG - 评测与配置

Aorus Master 16 AM6J: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 16 AM6J - 评测与配置

MSI Raider 16 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider 16 HX AI A2XWJG

MSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » 微星 Vector 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H

MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » 微星 Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651

MSI Raider 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro 2026: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro 2026

MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJG

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WX: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ProArt P16 H7606WX

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG

Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

Razer Blade 18 2026: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » Razer Blade 18 评测结论——性能极强、相对静音,但价格昂贵的游戏本

   » 2026款雷蛇Blade 18的价格比以前高出许多,但性能并未提升

MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 16.00", 2.7 kg
   » 微星 Raider 16 Max HX 的 175 瓦 GPU 在极致性能模式下平均功耗仅为 147 瓦

   » 微星 Raider 16 Max HX 证明英特尔 Arrow Lake 依然是不可忽视的力量

   » 微星 Raider 16 Max HX 拥有我们希望在更多笔记本电脑上看到的简单功能

   » 新的微星 Raider 16 Max "Apex "模式使电源配置文件选项更加混乱

   » 微星 Raider 16 Max HX 售价超过 3000 美元,甚至没有 Advanced Optimus 或 G-Sync

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Razer Blade 16:低性能静音模式下的游戏可能真的值得一玩

   » Razer Blade 16 采用英特尔而非 AMD 技术,电池续航时间延长数小时

   » 2026 Razer Blade 16 将 AMD 换成英特尔,效果显著

   » 最新的 Razer Blade 16 比以前亮了两倍,对 HDR 的支持显著增强

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2.8 kg
   » 评测结论 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 - 独一无二,但价格昂贵

   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo 2026 与 2023 - 牺牲性能以提高多任务处理能力

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 发布一年后仍是最快最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3 kg
   » 微星Stealth 18 HX的超大音量Cooler Boost模式在大多数游戏场景中并无必要

   » MSI Stealth 18 HX 或 Razer Blade 18:更薄、更轻不一定更好

   » 微星Stealth 18 HX 280 W交流适配器的温度接近70摄氏度,是我们见过的最热的适配器之一

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 华硕与联想:谁拥有最好的串联式 OLED 显示屏?

   » 配备 Tandem OLED 显示屏的全新华硕 ProArt P16 是您目前能买到的最佳多媒体笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   » 华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 供应疲软,表明微软对掌上游戏机信心不足

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 华硕 ProArt P16 预览版 - 现配备 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和 Lumina Pro OLED

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG 的 NEO 16 和 PRO 16 终究无法获得 G-Sync 和高级 Optimus 支持

Schenker Key 18 Pro M25 RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.1 kg
   » 全球国际货运的移动工作站 Key 18 Pro 提供高端功能和出色的维护选项

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » 你真的需要 440 Hz 吗?为什么 Razer Blade 18 的新双模显示屏对许多用户来说是一种降级?

   » Razer 新款 Blade 18 比 Alienware 18 轻 1 千克,但速度一样快,甚至更安静一些

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » 与微星 Titan 18 HX 相比,Alienware 18 Area-51 少了一项关键功能

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 的性能几乎超过了所有其他游戏笔记本电脑,我们有基准测试来证明这一点

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑对比:技嘉 Aorus Master 16 排名如何?

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » 英特尔被击败--配备 3D V-Cache 的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 是游戏的最佳选择

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25:仍是最佳游戏笔记本电脑之一,但缺乏高级 Optimus/G-Sync 功能

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Vega 10
Vega 9
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)