Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop是一款用于笔记本电脑的 Blackwell 系列移动显卡,曾在 2025 年的 CES 上亮相,并于 2025 年 4 月投入商用。

架构

GeForce RTX 5090 移动版使用了 GB203 芯片,并采用了 10,496 个着色器/CUDA 核心,这是该芯片支持的最大值 10,752 个着色器/CUDA 核心。这使得 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑与 RTX 5080 台式机变体(相同芯片)比 桌面版 RTX 5090的 20760 个内核和更高的时钟频率更为相似。

作为一项新功能,得益于第五代张量内核,Blackwell 通过 DLSS4 支持多帧生成(MFG)。

性能

我们的测试表明,与 175W RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU 的性能提升在 3DMark 测试中几乎不明显。不过,就整体游戏性能而言,该显卡比上一代移动旗舰产品快 2-19%。我们测试的最快笔记本电脑版本仅比 RTX 5080 台式机落后 5%。这意味着 5090L 通常能够流畅地显示 4k 的完整细节(见下文)。此外,有了前面提到的多帧生成(MFG),你可以获得令人印象深刻的帧率,但要注意延迟。

功耗

GB203 芯片采用台积电 4N(定制 4NP 5nm)工艺制造。显卡的最大 TGP 可达到 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X11
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines10496 - unified
TMUs328
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores82
Tensor / AI Cores328
Core Speed990 - 1515 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance31.8 TFLOPS FP16, 31.8 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL1: 10.3 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory24 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (95 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
19 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 17820     avg: 21987     median: 22241 (59%)     max: 24013 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 19216     avg: 23923     median: 24483 (50%)     max: 25763 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -100%
...
12806 -46%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
12820 -46%
15184 -37%
16308 -32%
16701 -30%
17764 -26%
19434 -19%
20756 -13%
20950 -12%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23923
...
19434 -19%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 94%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
862499 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
595187 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 69384     avg: 74433     median: 73846 (70%)     max: 80657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 133460     avg: 144088     median: 139912 (34%)     max: 163068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 35623     avg: 40786     median: 39227 (59%)     max: 49845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 42516     avg: 52408     median: 50860 (47%)     max: 62849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 532587     avg: 564006     median: 564006 (62%)     max: 595425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
153090 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 34972     avg: 45726     median: 46954 (54%)     max: 49864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
92650 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
203190 Points (78%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 40400     avg: 49212     median: 49088 (59%)     max: 54178 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 54052     avg: 67885     median: 69860 (53%)     max: 76300 Points
171.8 -100%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
43400 -36%
46877 -31%
51979 -23%
54921 -19%
56791 -16%
56866 -16%
59943 -12%
64819 -5%
65041 -4%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
67885
...
59943 -12%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 91%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
111238 Points (32%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
131334 Points (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
64778 Points (85%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
268.3 fps (81%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 15     avg: 18.1     median: 16 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 9     avg: 12.1     median: 11.2 (4%)     max: 18 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 22892     avg: 23907     median: 23907 (17%)     max: 24922 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 232.51     avg: 235.6     median: 235.6 (78%)     max: 238.7 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 121.3     avg: 277.8     median: 289 (17%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 99.5     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 242.8     avg: 254.8     median: 254.8 (96%)     max: 266.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 466     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (92%)     max: 557 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1067     avg: 1094     median: 1094.5 (81%)     max: 1121.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 975     avg: 1017     median: 1016.6 (96%)     max: 1058.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
1112 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1154 fps (48%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
4193 fps (33%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 515     median: 315 (8%)     max: 2756 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 181670     avg: 218007     median: 227694 (59%)     max: 234266 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7393     avg: 132811     median: 179788 (45%)     max: 231659 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 9883     avg: 15906     median: 15906 (57%)     max: 21929 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 10315     avg: 15697     median: 15697 (28%)     max: 21079 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 48753     avg: 53491     median: 53490.5 (44%)     max: 58228 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 224.5     median: 226 (30%)     max: 250 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 200     avg: 240.5     median: 240.5 (34%)     max: 281 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.778     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (72%)     max: 0.96 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 164.5     avg: 282     median: 294 (86%)     max: 343 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 160.4     avg: 277.3     median: 289 (37%)     max: 333 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4623     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.686 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
240 279 317 322 ~ 290 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
226 256 268 279 308 ~ 267 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 241 252 280 291 ~ 256 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57 58.6 58.8 59.8 62.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34 35.8 36.1 36.8 37.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16 16.7 17.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32.2 34.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 64 67.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
111.6
114
116.9
117.9
low 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.3 124.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.4 113.9 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 111.3 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77 82.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
102.3 107.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
118.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
112 115 126 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104 109 115 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90 95 97 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44 62 63 64 65 69 70 70 74 75 75 76 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37 50 51 54 55 55 56 57 59 59 59 63 64 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 36 39 40 40 41 41 42 46 46 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
47 53 53 53 55 59 61 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45 62 64 65 65 69 76 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
106
97
105
108
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
66
78
74
81
84
med. 1920x1080
206 231 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
203 225 ~ 214 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
171.3 184.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ultra 1920x1080
66.4 68.1 80.8 87.6 88.2 88.3 88.9 89 94.6 95.3 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 65.6 70.3 72 73.3 73.8 74.7 75 76.4 80.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 44.1 46 46.3 46.8 46.9 47.5 47.7 48.5 50.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.6 61.2 64 64.5 69.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
63.9 68.6 79 85 86.4 92.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
184.3 195.8 ~ 190 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151.7 165.7 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108 118.5 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.6 86 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.7 114.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
187.5 192.6 203 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.2 142.6 151.9 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7 119.6 121.9 127.9 128.6 130.6 132 133.4 133.9 135.2 140.3 142.3 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.1 97.3 99.1 101.3 102 102.2 102.6 105 105.9 106 107.1 112.6 112.9 115.9 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.2 62.3 63.5 65 65.6 66.4 66.6 66.6 68.6 70.8 73 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
76.2 113.9 118 120.6 122.4 133.7 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
72.9
180
80.2
82
84.2
91.5
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
109
51.9
51
51.8
56.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
100 106.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.1 92.6 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.3 81.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.8 65.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
124.9 134.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
201 205 215 229 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
186 194 200 209 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 157 165 169 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
128 147 147 151 161 162 162 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92 116 117 123 127 131 136 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60 71 79 82 90 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
131  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
109.9 110.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96.9 102.4 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.5 93.9 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.6 69.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.7 86.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
102.8 104.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102.1 103.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 101.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
97.2 98.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
97.5 100.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.3 91.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7 82.9 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
70 71.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
54 61 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
70.8 70.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57 63 65 74 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44 47 48 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27 28 30 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
46 52 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
64 67 70 73 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
45
44
47
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
76
82
82
85
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
236 240 301 343 361 421 ~ 317 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
236 260 299 335 342 369 399 ~ 320 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
236 240 252 281 305 324 341 357 357 ~ 299 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5 129 133 139 144.2 144.9 148 152 152.2 154.2 154.9 155.4 157.8 158.3 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.5 90 94.9 95 97.8 100 101 101.2 103.3 103.6 104 104.3 105 105.5 106.4 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.8 49 50 50.5 51.3 52 52 52.2 52.3 54.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
80.5 80.8 82 87.9 89.2 90.2 90.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
77.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.5 126 130.7 139.1 141 141.8 151 156.3 159.3 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
156.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
257
med. 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
104.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
84.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
121.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
157.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
153.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
140.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
123.4 130.5 135.7 145.4 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.6 129.6 137.7 138.6 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83 95 95.2 116.1 116.4 120.6 124.7 125.2 127.2 127.7 129.7 133.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57.6 76.7 81.1 82.4 82.9 83.4 84.5 88.1 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.5 88.8 91.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 43 43.1 45.9 46 46.2 46.8 47.1 47.7 49.3 49.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
69.7 75.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
70.9
72
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
21.8
22.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
19.7
20
20.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
38.7
38.2
39.4
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
66.7
65.8
71.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
116.3
120.6
125.7
med. 1920x1080
390  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
327  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
224  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.8 154.7 164.2 173.7 178.7 186 191.2 194.9 208 226 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.4 146.4 154.5 171.6 177.3 181.6 185 187.9 188.1 191 202 208 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.8 124.5 147 161.5 166.4 166.8 168.9 170.2 171.9 174.5 177.1 179.1 180 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 112.3 137.5 151.9 152.5 153.6 154.8 154.9 157 157.5 158.5 163.4 164 166.5 167.3 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.2 98.6 104.8 106.8 107.7 108.3 109.7 109.7 110.6 110.8 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 115.6 118.9 120.5 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.6 50.7 52.1 52.3 52.7 52.8 52.9 53.1 53.1 53.5 54.7 55 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.2 73.8 76.9 79.5 80.2 80.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
46.2 46.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
94.1 104.6 118.4 119 125.3 125.5 126.2 128.1 132.4 136.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
173.2
177.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
80.6
81.7
84.9
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
153.8
156.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
23.4
25.7
25
25
25.8
26.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
107.9
143.5
144.2
110
135
151.4
144.4
172.1
137.1
148.8
154
146
152.4
152.6
154.3
157
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
13.9
13.6
13
13
13.8
13.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
26.1
28.9
28.1
28.9
28.2
29.7
29.5
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
46.2
50.4
50.4
52
50
47.4
50.8
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.7
90.1
90
96.3
93.5
86.3
93.7
low 1920x1080
180 250 250 260.8 274 333.4 ~ 258 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
175 199 217 218.2 224 229.6 244 260.7 ~ 221 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
163.5 196.7 197 198.5 202 203.7 213.5 227.4 ~ 200 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
143.1 162 193.3 193.7 194 196.2 200 201 202 213 218.8 220.4 225.3 236.5 ~ 200 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.1 138.8 139.6 141.7 145.6 146 149.5 150.5 151 151 156.4 156.9 158.4 161.5 174.8 ~ 148 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.2 79.1 81.7 82.8 84.1 84.3 84.6 85.3 89.8 94 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
124.2 124.9 125.4 129 129 135.5 149.3 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
192 237.3 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
269
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
404 480 511 553 563 601 617 643 652 ~ 558 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
341 381 398 426 431 475 478 482 509 526 ~ 445 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
322 334 397 418 425 450 457 473 485 499 ~ 426 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
308 319 375 382 401 408 418 434 437 453 453.1 456 464 ~ 408 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
240 287 303 308 315 319 330 336 339 342.9 343 345 350 ~ 320 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
164.2 168 174.6 177.5 179.3 179.6 182.2 185.5 187.2 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108.9 109.4 122.9 140.4 149.2 153.2 153.7 158 160 161.3 161.6 163.4 172.3 181.1 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.6 111.8 133 136.1 139.2 141.5 143.3 143.6 143.9 148.3 152.6 155.6 158.1 159.9 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85.2 91.4 110 112.6 113.2 114.2 115.9 119.5 120.9 121.7 122.1 122.9 129.8 133.6 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.3 89.9 94.8 95.6 100 100.2 102.4 104.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
174.7 218 232 233 233 234 234 234 235 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.8 184.5 226 226 230 230 231 232 233 233 234 236 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.4 154.4 192.6 194.6 199.3 201 201 203 203 205 208 212 212 215 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.4 139.5 157 160.5 160.7 161.8 162.4 166.4 170.7 172.2 173.5 176.5 177.2 179.5 181 183.6 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
96.8 99 101.3 102.9 103.9 104.7 106.4 109.2 109.4 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
170.5 173.9 215 216 217 223 223 225 229 234 234 240 251 313 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152.7 154.4 184.1 186.6 189.4 193.8 195.2 196.6 204 207 207 210 214 288 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143.3 151.3 177.5 178.9 179.2 187.5 188.3 190.2 193 197.3 198.3 200 208 275 ~ 191 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137.1 141.9 161 166.4 167.2 170.3 171.5 175.5 176.4 184.7 185.6 186.1 186.6 248 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
133 151.6 165.3 168.6 174 176.8 178.5 179.9 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
192 218.5 224 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
151 185 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
114 129 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182 185.2 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
178 184.5 186.7 187.5 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
180.4 180.5 182.5 185.3 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121.6 136.6 140.9 142.4 161.9 162.4 162.8 164.1 166.1 166.2 186.9 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.9 121.4 129.7 133.4 156.8 158 160.1 163.1 164.3 165.6 183.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
150.7 173.2 176.1 179.5 179.9 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
84.4
110.3
110.6
114.7
116.7
104.2
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
183
184.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179.4
186.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25290267256593617
Doom: The Dark Ages133.51211111088043.3
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered118.4104.257.541.7
Assassin's Creed Shadows11810994675541
Civilization 7219214178
Monster Hunter Wilds857246
Kingdom Come Deliverance 219015911384
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle19414412810365
Stalker 2103907963
Call of Duty Black Ops 621319715715112076
Until Dawn1101009168
Space Marine 210310310198
Star Wars Outlaws85787158
Black Myth: Wukong109654730
F1 243173202991459951
Senua's Saga Hellblade 296.876.656.2
Ghost of Tsushima119.6115.1104.284.9
Horizon Forbidden West160.3121.6120.395
Dragon's Dogma 299.393.4
Helldivers 2157.7157.3153.8140.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357357
Alan Wake 21341311168445
Counter-Strike 2390327275224
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty18017616215010952
Baldur's Gate 325822120020014883
Strange Brigade558445426408320178
X-Plane 11.1115014111595
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark225222196165104
Dota 2 Reborn226199191176166
The Witcher 3212168122
GTA V184184182156148172
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
13


8
18


13
16

2
10
13

6
13
10
1
7
5
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 29. 22:41:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:39:32 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.032s ... 0.034s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.036s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12928 +0.025s ... 0.062s

#13 got single benchmarks 12928 +0.053s ... 0.115s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.098s ... 1.213s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.213s

#17 Got 1204 rows for game benchmarks. +0.714s ... 1.927s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.927s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 1.963s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.445s ... 2.408s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.412s

#22 return log +0s ... 2.412s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop graphics card

速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Razer 的新款 Blade 18 2025 配备了GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU 和支持高达 440 Hz 的双模显示屏,旨在提供最高的游戏性能。改进后的散热效果令人印象深刻,Blade 18 是游戏时较为安静的机型之一。然而,新的设计并没有真正击中要害。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.2 kg
Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测:性能至上

Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测:性能至上

重新设计的 Alienware 18 证明,不一定要最薄、最轻才性感。更厚的机身不仅能带来更高的性能,还能提供其他大多数游戏笔记本电脑所不具备的功能,包括 CherryMX 按键、多个 PCIe5 SSD 插槽以及更安静的游戏体验。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 4.2 kg
微星 Titan 18 HX AI 评测

微星 Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG 评测:酷睿至尊 9 285HX 和 175 瓦 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑性能无懈可击

Titan 18 HX AI 采用精英级英特尔酷睿超 9 285HX、NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 和 4K 120 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏,不遗余力地追求移动游戏霸主地位。虽然 Titan 18 HX AI 是一款光环产品,展示了英特尔和 Nvidia 的最佳性能,但它也有一些...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.6 kg
搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

我们终于拿到了精通测试的 Aorus Master 16,它配备了 RTX 5090、OLED 显示屏、Thunderbolt 5、PCIe 5.0 和 WiFi 7。这就是售价 4300 美元的新性能之王?...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
最高游戏性能的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 和 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 - XMG Neo 16 A25 评测

最高游戏性能的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 和 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 - XMG Neo 16 A25 评测

XMG 今年还推出了搭载 AMD 处理器的高端游戏笔记本电脑。我们正在测试的 Neo 16 A25 配备了 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 处理器、GeForce RTX 5090 显卡和 300 Hz mini LED 面板。它足以问鼎游戏王座吗?...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.9 kg

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测:配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  Review » AMD 凭借 Fire Range HX3D 成为游戏领域的佼佼者--Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 与 Intel Core Ultra 275HX 对比评测

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 得益于 300 Hz mini LED,最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑中的迷你 LED - 华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 评测

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测:速度超快,但温度有点高

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测:RTX 5090 带来的代价

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析:最快游戏 CPU 之争

SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析:最快游戏 CPU 之争

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 预览版--配备 AMD、RTX 5000 和 300 Hz Mini-LED 的最快游戏笔记本电脑

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快,但还有更多惊喜等着你

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090: , 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » 你真的需要 440 Hz 吗?为什么 Razer Blade 18 的新双模显示屏对许多用户来说是一种降级?

   » Razer 新款 Blade 18 比 Alienware 18 轻 1 千克,但速度一样快,甚至更安静一些

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » 与微星 Titan 18 HX 相比,Alienware 18 Area-51 少了一项关键功能

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 的性能几乎超过了所有其他游戏笔记本电脑,我们有基准测试来证明这一点

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑对比:技嘉 Aorus Master 16 排名如何?

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » 英特尔被击败--配备 3D V-Cache 的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 是游戏的最佳选择

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25:仍是最佳游戏笔记本电脑之一,但缺乏高级 Optimus/G-Sync 功能

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon RX 8040S *
Arc 140T *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 130T *

Class 3

GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-07-29)